Of the smoothed curves drawn between these series of points, those marked A, B, and C represent the time-curves of the beginnings of the first, second, and third phases respectively, while D is the time-curve for the maximum of the third phase.
The concavity of the two lower lines towards the horizontal base-line shows that the surface-velocity of the corresponding waves increases rapidly with the distance, far more so than would be possible with rectilinear motion. The rates at which these waves travel through the earth therefore increase with the depth, and the wave-paths must in consequence be curved lines convex towards the centre of the earth.
If the time-curves A and B were continued backwards to the origin, their inclinations at that point to the horizontal line give the initial velocities of the corresponding waves, which prove to be about 5 and 3 kms. per sec. respectively. Now, according to recent experiments made by Mr. H. Nagaoka on the elastic constants of rocks,[88] the mean velocity of seven archaean rocks is 5.1 kms. per sec. for the longitudinal waves, and 2.8 kms. per sec. for the transversal waves—values which agree so closely with those obtained for the first two series of earthquake-waves as to leave little doubt with regard to their character.
The other time-curves, C and D, corresponding to the initial and maximum epochs of the third phase, are practically straight lines. Some of the records are slightly discordant for the average curve, especially for the initial epoch; but it is often difficult to define the commencement of this phase with precision. At any rate, the observations show no distinct sign of an increase in the surface-velocity of these waves with the distance from the origin. It may therefore be concluded that they travel along the surface with velocities which are practically constant for each individual earthquake, the largest waves at the rate of about 2.9 kms. per sec., and the advance waves with a velocity of about 3.3 kms. per sec., rising occasionally to over 4.0 kms. per sec.
STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN THE EPICENTRAL AREA.
Changes of elevation have long been known as accompaniments of great earthquakes, though many of the earlier observations and measurements left much to be desired in accuracy and completeness. The Japanese earthquake of 1891, however, placed the reality of such movements beyond doubt, and revealed the existence of a fault-scarp, with a height in one place of 18 or 20 feet, and a length of at least 40, if not of 70, miles. In the Indian earthquake of 1897, the fault-scarps were shorter, though more pronounced in character, the largest known (the Chedrang fault) being about 12 miles long, and having a maximum throw at the surface of 35 feet. In some other recent earthquakes, also, remarkable fault-scarps have been developed. After the great shocks felt in Eastern Greece on April 20th and 27th, 1894, a fissure was traced for a distance of about 34 miles, running in an east-south-east and west-north-west direction through the epicentral district, and varying in width from an inch or two to more than three yards. That it was a fault, and not an ordinary fissure, was evident from its great length, its uniform direction, and its independence of geological structure. The throw was generally small, in no place exceeding five feet.[89] Again, in British Baluchistan, after the severe earthquake of December 20th, 1892, a fresh crack was observed in the ground running for several miles in a straight line parallel to the axis of the Khojak range. It coincided almost exactly with a line of springs, and was clearly produced by a fresh slip along an old line of fault, for before the earthquake it had the appearance of an old road, and the natives assert that the ground has always cracked along this line with every severe shock. In 1892, the change in relative height of the two sides of the fault was small, in one place where it was measured being only two inches.[90]
But other changes, besides those in a vertical direction, occasionally take place; though, owing to their recent discovery, comparatively few examples are as yet known. While the throw of the Japanese fault varied greatly in amount, and once even in direction, there was also a constant shift towards the northwest of the ground on the north-east side of the fault, the displacement at one spot being as much as 13 feet. In the fault-scarp formed in 1894 in Eastern Greece, a similar shift took place, though to what extent is unknown. There is, moreover, evidence of actual compression of the earth's crust at right angles to the fault-line. The Neo valley, traversed by the Japanese fault, was apparently narrower after the earthquake than it was before, and plots of ground were reduced from 48 to 30 feet in length—i.e., by nearly 40 per cent. In British Baluchistan, the formation of the fissure referred to above was accompanied both by compression perpendicular, and by shifting parallel, to the fault. The actual displacement in each direction is unknown, but the resultant was not less than 27 inches.
There can be no doubt that a fault-scarp is formed in the first place with great rapidity. So abrupt, indeed, were the structural displacements in the epicentral area of the Indian earthquake, that they contributed very materially to the intensity of the shock, giving rise to the excessive velocities observed at Rambrai and elsewhere (p. 273). The growth of the scarp does not, however, always cease with the first great earthquake, though it may take place in a contrary sense, as in the elevation connected with the Conception earthquake of 1835. The principal shock, according to Darwin, was followed during the few succeeding days "by some hundred minor ones (though of no inconsiderable violence), which seemed to come from the same quarter from which the first had proceeded; whilst, on the other hand, the level of the ground was certainly not raised by them; but, on the contrary, after an interval of some weeks, it stood rather lower than it did immediately after the great convulsion."[91]
AFTER-SHOCKS.
A series of after-shocks, more or less long, is a constant attendant on every great tectonic earthquake, and few are the earthquakes of any degree of strength that can be regarded as completely isolated. Even in those which visit this country, after-shocks are seldom absent. For instance, confining ourselves to the last few years, the Pembroke earthquake of 1892 was followed by 8 shocks, the Inverness earthquake of 1890 by at least 10, and possibly by 19 shocks, and that of the same district in 1901 by 15 well-defined after-shocks in addition to many others recorded by one observer. Of 300 Italian earthquakes strong enough to cause some damage to buildings, Dr. Cancani finds that every one was either preceded or followed, and chiefly followed, by its own train of minor shocks.
For some hours, and even for days, after a great earthquake, the shocks are so numerous that it is often impossible to keep count of them. Many local centres spring into activity in different parts of the epicentral area; and, though only the strongest shocks can be identified elsewhere, it is clear that as a rule the shocks felt at any one station are quite distinct from those observed at another.
The enormous number of after-shocks that follow some earthquakes can only be realised when they are subjected to continuous seismographic registration; and, even then, countless earth-sounds and the slightest tremors must escape detection. The shocks may, indeed, succeed one another so rapidly that one begins before another ends, and the result is an almost incessant tremulous motion rendered manifest by the quivering of water-surfaces or the swinging of chandeliers. Of the total number of after-shocks, we may form some idea from recent records in Japan. After the Mino-Owari earthquake of 1891, 3,365 shocks were recorded within little more than two years at Gifu, and 1,298 at Nagoya, but neither of these figures includes the shocks felt within the first few hours. Of the Kumamoto earthquake of July 28th, 1889, the after-shocks recorded at Kumamoto until the end of 1893 amount to 922; and those of the Kagoshima earthquake of September 7th, 1893, recorded at Chiran until the end of January 1894, to 480. During the first 30 days, the numbers recorded were 1,746 at Gifu, 340 at Kumamoto, and 278 at Chiran; showing, as Professor Omori remarks, that the after-shocks diminish in frequency with the size of the disturbed areas,[92]—i.e., roughly with the initial intensity of the shocks.
Next to absolute number, the rapid decline in general frequency is the most marked characteristic of after-shocks. Professor Omori has shown that, excluding minor oscillations, it follows the law represented geographically by the curves in Fig. 51, and algebraically by the equation y = k / (h + x), where y is the frequency at time x and h and k are constants for one and the same earthquake. By means of this formula, it is possible to estimate roughly the interval of time that must elapse before the seismic activity of the central district resumes its normal value. For the Mino-Owari earthquake, this proves to be about forty years, for the Kumamoto earthquake about seven or eight years, and for the Kagoshima earthquake about three or four years.
In a recent memoir on Italian after-shocks,[93] Dr. Cancani has urged that other factors besides initial intensity determine the duration of a seismic period, and prominently among these he places the depth of the seismic focus. When the depth is very small, the duration of the period is short, not much more than ten days; when the depth is moderate, the duration may extend to three months; and, when great, it may amount to several years.
The principal law that governs the distribution of after-shocks in time may be regarded as well-established. It is otherwise with regard to their distribution in space. This has been examined only in the cases of the Japanese earthquake of 1891 and the Inverness earthquake of 1901. So far as we can judge from the evidence which they furnish, after-shocks appear to be most numerous within and near the central portion of the seismic focus; though the area of maximum activity is subject to continual oscillation. In this region, also, there is evidence of a gradual decrease in the depths of the after-shock foci; while, near the extremities of the epicentral area, there occur districts of slightly greater frequency than elsewhere. With the lapse of time, there seems therefore to be a constant extension, both upwards and longitudinally, of the area over which the principal fault-slip took place.
ORIGIN OF EARTHQUAKES.
In the introductory chapter, a brief sketch is given of the different causes to which earthquakes are assigned. With those due to rock-falls in subterranean channels, we need have little to do. The shocks are invariably slight, and the part they play in the shaping of the earth's crust is insignificant. Volcanic earthquakes possess a higher degree of interest. They represent, no doubt, incipient or unsuccessful attempts to produce an eruption. They may be the forerunners of a great catastrophe.
Of far higher importance in the history of our globe is the third class of earthquakes, including all those connected with the manifold changes which the crust has undergone. In the slow annealing process, to which it has been subjected from the earliest times, the crust has been crumpled and fractured, elevated into the loftiest mountain ranges or depressed below the level of the sea. Every sudden yielding under stress is the cause of an earthquake. It is chiefly, perhaps almost entirely, in the formation of faults that this yielding is manifested. The initial fracturing may be the cause of one or many shocks, but infinitely the larger number must be referred to the slow growth of the fault, the intermittent slips, now in one part, now in another, which, after the lapse of ages, culminate in a great displacement. Of the length of time occupied in the formation of a single fault, we can make no estimate in years. The anticlinal fault of Charnwood Forest dates from a pre-carboniferous period. In 1893 it had not ceased to grow.[94]
Still less can we conceive, however faintly, the number of elemental slips that constitute the history of a single fault. We may think, if we please, of the 143 tremors and earth-sounds noted at Comrie in Perthshire during the last three months of 1839, of the 306 earthquakes felt in the Island of Zante during the year 1896, or the 1,746 shocks recorded at Gifu during thirty days in 1891; but we shall be as far as ever from realising the vast number of steps involved in the growth of a fault, let alone a mountain-chain.
Yet, all over the land-surface of the globe, the crust is intersected by numberless faults, and hardly any portion is there in which some or many of these faults are not growing. One country, indeed, such as Great Britain, may have reached a condition of comparative stagnancy; the fault-slips are few and slight, and earthquakes in consequence are rare and generally inconspicuous. In another, like Eastern Japan and the adjoining ocean-bed, the movements are frequent, occasionally almost incessant, and few years pass without some great convulsion by which cities are wrecked and hundreds of human lives are lost. At such times, we magnify the rôle of earthquakes, and are in some danger of forgetting that, in the formation of a mountain-chain or continent, they serve no higher purpose than the creaking of a wheel in the complex movements of a great machine.
FOOTNOTES:
[79] Phil. Trans., vol. li., pt. ii., 1761, pp. 625-626.
[80] Journ. Sci. Coll. Imp. Univ., Tokyo, vol. xi., 1899, pp. 194-195.
[81] Journ. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ., Tokyo, vol. vii., pt. v., 1894, pp. 1-4; Ital. Sismol. Soc. Boll., vol. ii., 1896, pp. 180-188.
[82] Journ. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ., Tokyo, vol. xi., 1899, pp. 161-195.
[83] Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lvi., 1900, pp. 1-7.
[84] There is no reason why the surface-undulations of the Indian earthquake should not have produced a sensible shock even as far as Italy. Taking their amplitude in that country at 508 mm. and their period at 22 sec. (p. 283), the maximum acceleration would be about 40 mm. per sec., corresponding to the intensity 2 of the Rossi-Forel scale. (Amer. Journ. Sci., vol. xxxv., 1888, p. 429.)
[85] Nature, vol. lii., 1895, pp. 631-633.
[86] Gerland's Beiträge zur Geophysik, vol. iii., pp. 485-518.
[87] Phil. Trans., 1900A, pp. 135-174.
[88] Publ. of Earthq. Inves. Com. in For. Langs. (Tokyo), No. 4, 1900, pp. 47-67.
[89] S.A. Papavasiliou, Paris, Acad. Sci., Compt. Rend., vol. cxix., 1894, pp. 112-114, 380-381.
[90] Geol. Mag., vol. x., 1893, pp. 356-360.
[91] Geol. Soc. Trans., vol. v., 1840, pp. 618-619.
[92] The disturbed areas of these earthquakes contained, respectively, 221,000, 39,000, and 30,000 square miles.
[93] Boll. Sismol. Soc. Ital., vol. viii., 1902, pp. 17-48.
[94] Roy. Soc. Proc., vol. lvii., 1895, pp. 87-95.
INDEX.ToC
- Acceleration, maximum, of wave-motion in Japanese earthquake, 184, 185;
- in Indian earthquake, 272
- After-shocks, definition, 4;
- frequency, 198, 256, 296, 344;
- distribution in space, 200, 203, 298, 326, 345;
- sound-phenomena, 207, 300;
- connection with fault-scarps, 300;
- outlining of epicentre by, 326;
- origin of, 257;
- of Neapolitan earthquake, 40;
- of Ischian earthquakes, 56, 65;
- of Andalusian earthquake, 97;
- of Charleston earthquake, 133;
- of Riviera earthquake, 167;
- of Japanese earthquake, 198;
- of Hereford earthquake, 240;
- of Inverness earthquake, 256;
- of Indian earthquake, 296;
- of British earthquakes, 343;
- of Italian earthquakes, 343;
- of Japanese earthquakes, 344
- Agamennone, G., 93, 94, 101, 319
- Alluvium, displacement of, by Indian earthquake, 287
- Amplitude of wave-motion, definition, 4;
- Andalusian earthquake, preparation for, 75;
- investigation of, 76;
- damage caused by, 77;
- isoseismal lines and disturbed area, 78;
- the unfelt earthquake, 82;
- position of epicentre, 84;
- depth of focus, 85;
- nature of shock, 87;
- sound-phenomena, 91;
- velocity of earth-waves, 92;
- connection between geological structure and intensity of shock, 95;
- fissures, 96;
- landslips, 97;
- effect on underground water, 97;
- after-shocks, 97;
- origin of, 99;
- bibliography, 101
- Animals, effects of earthquakes on, 143
- Baluchistan earthquake of 1892, 288, 341
- Baldacci, L., 70, 73
- Baratta, M., 320
- Barrois, C., 76
- Bergeron, C., 76
- Bertelli, T., 175
- Bertrand, M., 76
- Birds, effects of earthquakes on, 143
- Bordwar, crust-fracture at, 309
- Bréon, R., 76
- Burton, W.K., 214
- Cancani, A., 281, 282, 320, 343, 345
- Castro, M.F. de, 76, 101
- Charleston earthquake, investigation of, 102;
- damage caused by, 103;
- isoseismal lines and disturbed area, 104;
- preparation for, 107;
- nature of shock, 108;
- double epicentre, 111;
- origin of double shock, 120;
- depth of foci, 122;
- velocity of earth-waves, 126;
- fissures, 130;
- sand-craters, 130;
- effects on human beings, 131;
- feeling of nausea, 132;
- after-shocks, 133;
- origin of, 134;
- bibliography, 137
- Charlon, E., 175
- Chedrang, fault-scarp at, 304
- Clocks, untrustworthiness of time-records of stopped, 39, 94, 121, 127
- Conder, J., 177, 213
- Coseismal lines, 227, 324
- Covelli, N., 67, 69
- Damage caused by Neapolitan earthquake, 10, 24;
- Darwin, H., 281
- Daubrée, A., 73
- Davison, C, 202-206, 208, 210, 213, 215-261, 295
- Death-rate of Neapolitan earthquake, 24;
- Denza, F., 155, 175
- Depth of seismic focus, methods of determining, 25, 86, 122, 326;
- Derby earthquake of 1903, 236
- Direction of shock, 22, 33, 186, 225, 325
- Disturbed area, definition of, 3;
- of Neapolitan earthquake, 10;
- of Ischian earthquakes, 51, 58;
- of Andalusian earthquake, 80;
- of Charleston earthquake, 107;
- of Riviera earthquake, 145;
- of Japanese earthquake, 183;
- of Hereford earthquake, 219;
- of Inverness earthquake, 249;
- of Indian earthquake, 265;
- connection between intensity of shock and, 323
- Dolomieu, 11
- Du Bois, F., 73
- Dutton, C.E., 103-137
- Dutton's method of determining depth of seismic focus, 122, 327
- Earthquake-motion, nature of, 280, 282, 328, 330, 337;
- propagation of, to great distances, 337
- Earth-sound, definition of, 4
- Edinburgh, record of Indian earthquake at, 281, 283, 285
- Ellis, W., 83
- Emergence, angle of, 13
- Epicentre, definition of, 3;
- methods of determining position of, 14, 52, 60, 324;
- of Neapolitan earthquake, 22, 23;
- of Ischian earthquakes, 53, 60, 67;
- of Andalusian earthquake, 84;
- of Charleston earthquake, 111;
- of Riviera earthquake, 146;
- of Hereford earthquake, 224;
- of Inverness earthquake, 248;
- of Indian earthquakes, 264, 276, 302
- Epomeo, 45, 61, 71
- Falb's method of determining depth of seismic focus, 86, 327
- Fallen pillars, evidence of, 17, 19
- Fault, originating, of Hereford earthquake, 219;
- of Inverness earthquake, 249
- Fault-scarp of Japanese earthquake, 189;
- Fault-scarps of Indian earthquakes, 273, 304;
- Fault-slips, tectonic earthquakes due to, 5, 43, 100, 135, 174, 211, 219, 224, 241, 249, 255, 317, 346
- Fishes, destruction of, by Riviera earthquake, 162
- Fissures, caused by Andalusian earthquake, 96;
- Focus, seismic, definition of, 3
- Focus, seismic, depth of, methods of determining, 25, 86, 122, 326;
- Focus, dimensions of seismic, of Hereford earthquake, 224;
- of Inverness earthquake, 250
- Fore-shocks, 321;
- Fouqué, F., 76, 84, 101
- Fracture, crust-, at Bordwar, 309
- Fractures in buildings, evidence of, 14, 15, 26
- Fuchs, C.W.C., 102
- Galli, I., 82
- Geological structure and intensity of shock, connection between, 95, 106, 113, 115, 135, 164, 265
- Gifu, records of Japanese after-shocks at, 183, 197
- Gray, T., 295
- Great Glen fault and Inverness earthquakes, connection between, 245
- Greek earthquake of 1894, fault-scarp of, 340
- Hayden, E., 103
- Heath, T., 283, 320
- Hereford earthquake, investigation of, 215;
- preparation for, 215, 238;
- isoseismal lines and disturbed area of, 216;
- damage caused by, 217, 294;
- position of originating fault, 219;
- nature of shock, 220;
- origin of double series of vibrations, 223;
- position and dimensions of the two foci, 224;
- direction of the shock, 225;
- coseismal lines and velocity of earth-waves, 227;
- sound-phenomena, 229;
- isacoustic lines and sound-area, 234;
- fore-shocks, 238;
- after-shocks, 240;
- origin of earthquake, 240;
- bibliography, 261
- Hills, changes in aspect of, after Indian earthquake, 311
- Hirata, K., 327, 331
- Human beings, effects of Charleston earthquake on, 131
- Hypocentre, 3
- Iberian peninsula, earthquakes of, 75
- Indian earthquake, investigation of, 262;
- isoseismal lines and disturbed area, 264;
- nature of shock, 266;
- visible earth-waves, 268;
- elements of wave-motion, 270;
- sound-phenomena, 274;
- velocity of earth-waves, 275;
- the unfelt earthquake, 280;
- earth-fissures, 285;
- displacements of alluvium, 287;
- sand-vents, 288;
- rise of river-beds, etc., 290;
- landslips, 291;
- rotation of pillars, 293;
- after-shocks, 296;
- structural changes in epicentral area, 301, 315;
- structure of epicentral district, 302;
- fault-scarps, 304;
- crust-fractures, 309;
- lakes and pools not due to faulting, 310;
- changes in aspects of hills, 311;
- revision of trigonometrical survey, 312;
- origin of earthquake, 317;
- bibliography, 319
- Inverness earthquake, preparation for, 246;
- damage caused by, 247;
- fissure in ground, 247;
- isoseismal lines and disturbed area, 247;
- position of originating fault, 249;
- nature of shock, 250;
- sound-phenomena, 253;
- origin of earthquake, 255;
- after-shocks and their origin, 256;
- sympathetic earthquakes, 259;
- comparison with Japanese earthquake, 260;
- bibliography, 261.
- Investigation, Mallet's methods of, 12, 21
- Isacoustic lines, 234;
- Ischia, volcanic history of, 45, 70;
- Ischian earthquake of 1881, investigation of, 50;
- Ischian earthquake of 1883, investigation of, 56;
- Ischian earthquakes, characteristics of, 66; origin of, 70
- Isoseismal lines, definition of, 3;
- their use in determining position of epicentre, 219, 249, 325;
- of Neapolitan earthquake, 9;
- of Ischian earthquakes, 51, 58;
- of Andalusian earthquake, 78;
- of Charleston earthquake, 104;
- of Riviera earthquake, 143;
- of Japanese earthquake, 178, 182;
- of Hereford earthquake, 216;
- of Inverness earthquake, 247;
- of Indian earthquake, 264
- Issel, A., 139, 163, 164, 166, 175
- Japanese earthquake of 1887, 18
- Japanese earthquake of 1891, investigation of, 177;
- structure of meizoseismal area, 179;
- damage caused by, 181;
- isoseismal lines and disturbed area, 182;
- nature of shock, 184;
- the great fault-scarp, 189;
- minor shocks, 197;
- distribution of after-shocks in time, 198;
- preparation for, 201;
- distribution of after-shocks in space, 203;
- sound-phenomena of after-shocks, 207;
- sympathetic earthquakes, 209;
- origin, of, 211;
- bibliography, 213
- Japanese earthquake of 1894, 18, 329
- Johnston-Lavis, H.J., 50-72, 327
- Kilian, W., 76
- Koto, B., 177, 180, 181, 184, 190-196, 209, 212, 213
- Lakes formed by bending of river-bed during Indian earthquake, 310
- Lakes formed by fault-scarp of Japanese earthquake, 194;
- of Indian earthquake, 305
- Landslips caused by Ischian earthquake, 64;
- Lévy, M., 76
- Lisbon earthquake of 1755, 75, 82
- McGee, W.J., 134
- Macpherson, J., 101
- Magnetographs, earthquakes recorded by, 82, 157, 160, 189, 277, 282
- Mallet, R., 7-44, 85, 102, 124, 150, 294-296, 325
- Mallet's method of determining depth of focus, 25, 327
- Masato, H., 178, 213
- Mascart, E., 159, 160
- May Hill anticlinal and Hereford earthquake, connection between, 242
- Meizoseismal area, definition of, 3;
- Mercalli, G., 11, 57, 58, 60, 61, 63, 67, 70-73, 76, 80, 84, 85, 88, 90, 101, 138-175, 325, 327
- Michell, J., 325
- Milne, J., 35, 177, 181, 182, 186, 189, 200, 213, 281, 283
- Minor shocks of Neapolitan earthquake, 40;
- of Japanese earthquake, 197
- Mountain ranges, effect of, on intensity of shock, 95, 106
- Moureaux, T., 161
- Nagaoka, H., 177, 214, 339
- Nagoya, records of Japanese after-shocks at, 183, 197
- Nature of shock, Neapolitan earthquake, 30;
- Nausea, feeling of, caused by Charleston earthquake, 132
- Neapolitan earthquake, investigation of, 7, 12;
- Ness, Loch, connection between Inverness earthquakes and formation of, 255, 257, 261
- Nogués, A.F., 101
- Oddone, E., 175
- Offret, A., 76, 158, 159, 175
- Oglialoro, A., 73
- Oldham, R.D., 262-320, 337, 340
- Omori, F., 19, 20, 177, 183-186, 188, 197-199, 207, 214, 262, 325, 327, 329, 331
- Origin of earthquakes, 2, 5, 345;
- Overturned bodies, maximum acceleration deduced from, 184, 272
- Palmieri, L., 57, 72, 73
- Periodicity of Japanese after-shocks, 199
- Perrey, A., 7
- Potenza, evidence of damaged church at, 15, 26
- Prediction of earthquakes, possible, 322
- Preparation for earthquakes, 40, 57, 76, 107, 142, 201, 238, 246, 321
- Rails, flexure of, by Charleston earthquake, 112;
- Railway-tunnels, observations of Riviera earthquake in, 166
- Rebeur-Paschwitz, E. von, 281
- River-beds, rise of, caused by Indian earthquake, 290
- Riviera earthquake, investigation, 138;
- damage caused by, 139;
- preparation for, 142;
- isoseismal lines and disturbed area, 143;
- position of epicentre, 146;
- depth of principal focus, 149;
- nature of shock, 150;
- sound-phenomena, 156;
- the unfelt earthquake, 157;
- effects of earthquake at sea, 162;
- destruction of fishes, 162;
- seismic sea-waves, 163;
- connection between geological structure and intensity of shock, 164;
- observations in railway-tunnels, 166;
- after-shocks, 167;
- recent movements in the Riviera, 170;
- seismic history of the Riviera, 171;
- origin of, 171;
- bibliography, 175
- Rocca di Papa, record of Indian earthquake at, 281, 282, 285
- Rossi, M.S. de, 57, 74, 82, 101, 175
- Rossi-Forel scale of seismic intensity, 104, 216, 247
- Rotation of pillars, caused by Hereford earthquake, 294;
- Rudzki, P., 336
- Rumi, Prof., 169
- Samin, fault-scarp at, 308
- Sand-craters caused by Charleston earthquake, 130;
- by Indian earthquake, 288
- Schmidt, A., 336
- Seismic sea-waves of Riviera earthquake, 142, 163
- Seismic vertical, 12, 29, 62
- Seismographic records of Riviera earthquake, 154;
- of Japanese earthquake of 1894, 329
- Sekiya, S., 18, 19
- Serpieri, A., 74
- Shillong, nature of Indian earthquake at, 266
- Sloan, E., 103, 117-119, 134, 135
- Sound-area, definition of, 3;
- Sound-phenomena, nature of sound, 38, 229, 252, 332;
- inaudibility to some observers, 231, 274; its cause, 233;
- isacoustic lines, 234-236;
- variations in nature of sound throughout sound-area, 237;
- time-relation of sound and shock, 238, 253;
- origin of earthquake-sounds, 334;
- sound-phenomena of Neapolitan earthquake, 37;
- of Andalusian earthquake, 91;
- of Charleston earthquake, 133;
- of Riviera earthquake, 156;
- of Japanese after-shocks, 207;
- of Hereford earthquake, 229;
- of Inverness earthquake, 252;
- of Indian earthquake, 274
- Structural changes, distribution of, in Indian earthquake, 315
- Subsultory shock, 5
- Sympathetic earthquakes of Japanese earthquake, 209;
- of Inverness earthquake, 259
- of Inverness earthquake, 259
- Tanakadate, A., 177, 214
- Taramelli, T., 76, 84, 85, 88, 90, 101, 138, 150, 165, 175, 325
- Tectonic earthquakes, 5
- Thrust-plane, Indian earthquake due to movement along, 318
- Time-curve of Indian earthquake, 278;
- of principal epochs of earthquake-waves of distant origin, 338
- Time-records, general inaccuracy of, 324
- Time-relations of sound and shock in Hereford earthquake, 238;
- in Inverness earthquake, 253
- Trigonometrical survey, revised, of Khasi hills after Indian earthquake, 312;
- interpretation of results, 314
- Twin earthquakes, origin of, 32, 89, 120, 153, 174, 223;
- Undulatory shock, 5
- Unfelt earth-waves, Andalusian earthquake, 82;
- Uzielli, G., 143, 176
- Velocity, maximum, of wave-motion, in Neapolitan earthquake, 35;
- in Indian earthquake, 272
- Velocity of earth-waves, methods of determining, 39, 93, 127, 229;
- Visible earth-waves in Charleston earthquake, 110;
- Volcanic earthquakes, 5, 70
- Vorticose shock, 5
- Water, effect of Andalusian earthquake on underground, 97
- Waterfalls caused by fault-scarps of Indian earthquake, 305
- Wave-path, 13
- West, C.D., 272
- Woolhope anticlinal and Hereford earthquake, connection between, 241