Airplane Photography

“Spotting,” as distinct from mapping or from the photography of continuous strips, is the photography of a definite individual objective. In military work spotting or “pin pointing” includes the photography of particular trenches or pivotal points in a trench system before an attack (Fig. 123), of roads or bridges along which an advance must pass (Fig. 124), of batteries or big guns which are the subject of artillery fire (Fig. 125), both before and after their bombardment (Fig. 126), of gun puffs or exploding bombs (Fig. 131).

The technique of spotting consists largely in getting properly over the target and then securing the exposure at just the right moment. This is chiefly a question of proper piloting; but the aid which can be offered to the pilot by camera auxiliaries designed particularly for spotting needs is very large.

Discussion of the task of the pilot who must steer a photographic plane accurately over a previously selected point of interest cannot be undertaken without raising the question of who should take the picture, pilot or observer? In the English service the most general practice was for the pilot to be charged with the responsibility both of covering the objective and of exposing. If a propeller drive was used on the camera, this left to the observer only the task of changing magazines. If the camera was hand operated the plates were changed either by the observer, or else, as was frequently the case, distance operating devices were attached, so that the pilot even then did everything except change the magazines, and the observer was kept free to watch the sky for enemy aircraft. A very desirable adjunct to the camera when plates are shifted automatically or by the observer is a distance indicator, to show the pilot when the shutter is set. Electrical indicators for this purpose have been devised.

If the camera is completely hand operated, as were most of those in the French and German services, there is little choice but for the observer to perform the entire operation. The exposing operation could have been delegated to the pilot, but such was not the custom with the French or with the American squadrons using French apparatus. In this method of operation the observer depends on the pilot to get the plane over the target, while the pilot depends on the observer to get the picture when the target is covered. Ample opportunity is thus offered for misunderstanding and disagreement. This can be avoided only by excellent sights properly aligned, for both pilot and observer, and by some means of communication between the two men concerned.

The simplest means of communication is of course direct conversation. But this is only possible in those planes, such as the DH-9, in which pilot's and observer's cockpits are immediately together, so that, by shouting, any desired information can be conveyed with fair ease. When the distance is increased to four or five feet, as in the DH 4, the loudest shouts are totally lost in the roar of the engine and the blast of the wind. Speaking tubes and telephones are now fairly good, but are none too comfortable or convenient to have strapped on one's head and face. A primitive device used to some extent in the war was merely a pair of reins attached to the pilot's arms, by which he could be directed which way to steer. There is much to be said for a simple semaphore system, where an indicator in the observer's cockpit actuates a similar dial in front of the pilot, indicating “right” or “left,” “picture obtained,” “try again,” etc. If the observer has a sight by which he can see far enough ahead to correct the pilot's error of pointing, the need for an accurate sight for the pilot is diminished.

In considering the question of sights, attention may again be called to the poor “visibility” from the pilot's seat in the present prevailing type of two-seater tractor plane. Blind directly in front, beneath, and to either side (Figs. 7, 8 and 9), it is no unusual thing for a pilot to entirely miss an objective, such as a railway line, which he can only estimate to be beneath him by judging its distance from those objects to either side which he can actually see. The English practice of leaving a clear space of six inches to a foot between the fuselage and the beginning of the wing fabric, allows the pilot to look down over the side, a decided advantage. But for photographic purposes nothing can compare with a good negative lens carrying fore and aft lines or wires, so that the pilot can see his objective in ample time to head directly for it. The lens should either be large enough so that its rear edge gives the view directly downward, or supplemented by an additional lens pointing directly down, so that the covering of the target is assured. To locate such a lens in the front cockpit, free of all controls, is a very hard task; even so its view is likely to be badly interrupted by the landing gear. Nevertheless, so important is it, both in photography and in bombing, to have a sight by which the plane can be accurately directed that designers of planes should recognize this need and make every effort to provide a suitable location.

Sights for the observer have been discussed already. Here again the negative lens is to be preferred, but while the pilot's lens needs only directing lines in the axis of the plane (unless he takes the picture), the observer's lens needs both an accurate center mark and an additional upper or lower sighting point. Accurate alignment of these marks with the camera axis must be arranged for in precise spotting.

Accurate spotting work requiring the delineation of fine detail calls for cameras of considerable focal length. The camera of longest focal length used in the war was the French 120 centimeter (Fig. 41). This was employed with great success in such work as regulating the fire of heavy railway guns brought into range only at night, to fire a few shots at chosen angles. Photographs taken the next day would then show the exact spot where each shell fell, and the damage it did, to serve as a guide for the next night's operations (Fig. 127). The field of these cameras is quite small—8 to 12 degrees—and so not only must sighting be exact but the area covered on the ground must be accurately known. This is to be calculated from the altitude, focal length, and plate size, by the relation—

Data derived from such calculations may be incorporated in tables, or graphically in diagrams such as Figs. 128 and 129.

These calculations and others required in mapping and stereo-work are simply and quickly made by slide-rule devices. One of these, the Burchell Photographic Slide Rule, developed in the English service, is shown in Fig. 130. This consists of two dials, the center one of which is mounted—usually by a pin pushed into a cork behind—so as to turn freely, to permit its being set for altitude, focal length, ground speed, plate size, etc., whereupon the area covered, or the appropriate interval between exposures may be read off.

Cameras for spotting work should be capable of exposure at the exact moment desired. For if the camera is ever to catch the gun as it discharges, the bomb as it falls (Fig. 131), or the shell as it explodes (Fig. 132), the photograph must be taken within the instant. Automatic cameras, exposing at regular intervals, while adequate for mapping, are not fitted for many kinds of spotting.

Technique of Negative Making.—Stated in its simplest terms, the whole problem of making a photographic map from the air consists in taking a large number of slightly overlapping negatives, all from the same altitude, with the plane flying uniformly level. When trimmed and mounted in juxtaposition, or pasted together so as to overlap in their common portions, the prints from these negatives constitute a complete pictorial map. There is thus furnished by a few hours' labor topographic information which would be the work of months to obtain by other means.

The making of map photographs involves all the special technique of spotting, with much in addition. The pilot's task is not merely to go over one object; he must navigate a narrow path, at a constant altitude, on an even keel. If he is to make not merely a ribbon, but a map of considerable width, he must take successive trips parallel to the first, each displaced just far enough from the previous course to insure that no portion is missed—a difficult task indeed.

It is the observer's duty to so time the intervals between exposures that they overlap enough, but not so much as to be wasteful of plates or film. He must also change magazines or films so quickly as to miss no territory, or if some be missed, his is the task of directing the pilot back to the point of the last exposure, where they begin a new series.

Level flying is entirely a pilot's problem. Its importance will be realized when we consider the accompanying diagrams (Figs. 134 and 135), where the effect on the resultant picture is shown of climbing, gliding, or banking to either side. Prints from negatives distorted in this way neither will be true representations of the territory photographed, nor will they match when juxtaposed. In fact, they can be utilized only if special rectifying apparatus is available for printing. Flying at a constant altitude is similarly necessary if the prints are to be utilized without enlargement or reduction in order to make them fit.

Assuming a skilled pilot who will do his part, the next step is to calculate the exposure intervals in order to insure an adequate overlap. If a negative lens is installed which has been marked with a rectangle the size of the camera field, the simplest method is to estimate the proper instant for exposure by watching the progress of objects across the lens face. This of course requires constant attention, and it is easier to do this only occasionally, in order to determine the ground speed in terms of camera fields traversed per minute. Thereafter exposures are to be made by time, as determined by a watch or clock. Any desired degree of overlap can be chosen, and either estimated, or more or less accurately fixed by lines marked on the negative lens at a shorter distance apart than the edges of the field. The most usual overlap is 20 per cent., except for stereos, which call for 50 to 75 per cent.

In the absence of a negative lens or some other sight to show the whole camera field, it is necessary to resort to calculation from the speed and altitude of the plane, the focus of the lens and the dimensions of the plate. If A is the altitude, a the focal length of the lens, d the diameter of the plate in the direction of travel (usually the short length is chosen for economy of flights to cover a given width), f the fractional part by which one negative is desired to overlap the next, and V the ground speed of the plane, then we have, by simple proportion, that the interval between exposures, t, must be—

If A = 2000 meters, d = 18 centimeters, f = ⅕, a = 50 centimeters, and V = 200 kilometers per hour, this relation gives—

The principle of overlapping map exposures is shown in the accompanying diagram (Fig. 129), together with data calculated as above for a 4 × 5 inch plate.

It is particularly to be noted that it is the ground speed of the plane that is used. This may be calculated by knowing the air speed and the wind velocity and direction. Fig. 136 shows the method of doing this graphically. First an arrow is drawn representing the direction it is desired to fly. Next a second arrow is drawn of length to represent the wind velocity. This must be inclined toward the first arrow in the direction of the wind, and its head is to touch the head of the first arrow. Then with the farther end of this second arrow as a center, describe a circle of such a length as to represent the air speed of the plane, in the same units as the wind velocity. Connect the point where this circle cuts the arrow of flight direction to the center of the circle by a straight line. This line constitutes the air speed arrow, giving the direction it is necessary to fly, at the given air speed, to make the course desired. The length of the flight direction arrow between its head and its point of intersection with the air speed arrow gives the ground speed.

When the wind is ahead or astern this calculation reduces to the simple subtraction or addition of the wind velocity to the air speed of the plane. Whenever possible, mapping should be done up and down the wind (Fig. 137). If the plane is “crabbing,” the above calculations for overlap are only valid if the camera can be turned normal to the direction of travel over the ground. If the camera cannot be so turned the corners of the successive pictures overlap instead of their sides, with quite unsatisfactory results (Fig. 138).

Calculation of the distance apart of the parallel flights necessary to make a map of any width is done by the use of a formula similar to the longitudinal overlap formula above, distance figuring instead of time. Using the same symbols, and denoting the distance by D, we have—

With the same figures as before, but substituting 24 centimeters for the plate dimension, this relation gives—

It is of course largely a pilot's problem to steer the plane over parallel courses at a given distance apart, although the observer, noting conspicuous objects through a properly marked negative lens, may direct the pilot by any of the means of communication already mentioned.

An alternative method of securing parallel strips, which is to be highly recommended where enough photographically equipped airplanes are available, is for several planes to fly side by side, maintaining their proper separation (Fig. 139).

Cameras and Auxiliaries for Map Making.—Mapping can be done quite satisfactorily by hand operated or semi-automatic cameras, provided the observer has not too many other duties. On the other hand, the operation of exposing at more or less definite intervals of time, irrespective of the object immediately presented to the camera, is a largely mechanical one. It naturally suggests the employment of an automatic mechanism, whose speed of operation only is it necessary to watch.

If a non-automatic camera is used the timing of exposures may be done by watching a negative lens, as described above, or by reference to a clock, assuming that the ground speed is known through calculation. A very practical advance over the ordinary use of a clock is to attach a stop-watch to the shutter release, so that it is turned back to zero and re-started at each exposure (Fig. 70). In passing, it may be noted that if the stop-watch hand makes an electric contact which throws the shutter release, then the device constitutes an attachment for turning any semi-automatic camera into an automatic. The most suitable cameras for mapping are unquestionably those of the entirely automatic type. The use of such cameras always demands a knowledge of the ground speed. This demand has led to many suggestions for ground speed indicators. The common idea of these is to provide a moving part on the plane—either a disc of large diameter, or a chain, or a revolving screw—whose speed may be varied until any point upon it appears to keep in coincidence with a point on the moving landscape below. The ground speed is then to be read off a properly calibrated dial. Or, as a further step, the frequency of the exposures may be directly controlled by the ground speed indicator mechanism. The entire control of the camera would then consist merely in occasional adjustment of the ground speed indicator.

While entirely possible in theory, these devices are not easy to work with in practice, because the plane is always subject to some pitching and rolling, which make it difficult to hold any object constantly on the moving point. This is especially true at high altitudes, where the apparent motion of the earth is quite slow compared to the swervings of the plane. This objection is in part removed if the ground speed indicator is carried by a gyro stabilizer.

Ordinary mapping does not demand such exquisite rendering of detail as does trench mapping. Nor is it necessary to fly in peace-time at such high altitudes as in war. In consequence, mapping cameras are preferably of the short focus, wide angle type, say, 25 centimeter focus for an 18 × 24 centimeter plate. Film is to be preferred over plates because of the greater number of exposures it is possible to make on a flight. The shutter of the mapping camera must be extremely uniform in its rate of travel so that the elements of the map may match in tone (Fig. 140). A mount which permits the camera to be turned normal to the direction of flight, such as the British turret mount (Fig. 87), is particularly desirable if flying across the wind is necessary, as will often be the case in mapping strips between towns or between flying fields. Devices to indicate compass direction and altitude are called for in new and poorly mapped territory, and may be expected to receive intensive study in the future. The question of their utility is, however, bound up with the whole question of the sphere of aerial photographic mapping. Up to the present this has been almost entirely a matter of filling in details on maps obtained by the regular surveying methods, or of making pictorial maps for aviators. To what extent primary mapping can be done by the airplane is yet to be determined.

At this point mention must be made of special cameras for securing extremely wide angle views, thereby minimizing the number of flights. The Bagley camera, devised by Major Bagley of the U. S. Engineers, is an example. It has three lenses, a middle one pointing directly downward, and one to either side at an angle of 35 degrees. The pictures obtained with the side cameras are of course greatly distorted, and must be rectified in a special rectifying camera. The resultant definition is not good, but as the maps are made on a much smaller scale than the original pictures, this is not a serious objection. It is a matter for the future to decide whether the additional labor on the ground necessary for the rectifying process is to be more expensive than the extra flights which must be made with the ordinary types of cameras covering a smaller angle.

Printing and Mounting Mosaics.—With an ordinary set of overlapping negatives the first step toward producing a map is to scale the negatives. For this purpose one should be selected which by comparison with a map shows no distortion, and which is on the desired scale, or is known to have been made at the average altitude of flight. A sketch map of the territory should then be drawn, on this scale, based on available maps. This sketch is preferably made on a large ground glass illuminated from behind (Fig. 141). On this all the negatives should be laid, and their proper relative positions sought. When this is done it is evident at once whether all the territory has been covered, and whether there are any superfluous negatives. Each negative should then be examined as to its scale and distortion. If it can be made to fit the scale by simple enlargement or reduction, a line can be drawn on one edge of a length indicating its scale. This line will later be used as a guide in the enlarging camera. If the picture is badly distorted it must either be replaced by another negative, or if rectifying apparatus is available, it must be set aside for the making of a rectified print.

The next step is to make prints from the negatives, which may be done either by contact, or, necessarily if differences of scale must be compensated, in the enlarging camera. If prints to an exact scale are required the shrinkage of the paper must be determined and allowed for. The prints must all show the same tone, and must be uniform from edge to edge. If the focal-plane shutter is not uniform in its travel, as is frequently the case, this means that the print must be “dodged,” or exposed more at one edge than the other, by locally shielding the plate and paper during exposure. A case of the step-like effect caused by uneven shutter action is shown in Fig. 140. The effect due to uneven shutter action is of course absent with a between-the-lens shutter, which constitutes a strong argument in favor of that type for use in mapping cameras.

When the prints are made they must be mounted together on a large card or cloth background. For a very small mosaic they may be juxtaposed by simple examination, matching corresponding details in successive prints. For a mosaic of any size an accurate outline map must be drawn on the surface to which the prints are to be attached. The prints are then laid out on this outline, moved to their correct positions, and held down by pins (Fig. 142). When they are all arranged the final mounting may be begun. The excess paper, beyond what is necessary for safe overlaps, may be trimmed off, exercising judgment as to which print of each adjacent pair is of the better quality, and utilizing it for the top one at the overlapping junction. If one print shows serious distortion it may be placed under its fellows on all four edges, thus minimizing its weight. The edges are best made irregular by tearing. Straight edges are apt to force themselves on one's attention in the final mosaic and give an erroneous impression of the existence of straight roads or other features. Both forms of edging are shown in Figs. 124 and 143.

An alternative method of securing the final print mosaic, where film negatives are used, is to trim successive film negatives so that the trimmed sections will exactly juxtapose, instead of overlap. The sections are then mounted, by stickers at their edges, on a large sheet of glass, and printed together. Captured German prints show that this was the method commonly used with the German film camera (Fig. 62).

It will be noted that the procedure which has been described and illustrated by Figs. 142 and 143 assumes the previous existence of a map accurately placing at least the chief features of the country covered. This draws attention at once to the limitations and true sphere of aerial photographic mapping at the present time. With the cameras thus far it is not possible, nor is it attempted, to do primary mapping of unknown regions. Distortions due to lens, shutter, film warping and paper shrinkage considerably exceed the figures permitted in precision mapping. From the standpoint of geodetic accuracy the cumulative errors of deviations in direction, altitude and level, peculiar to flying, would soon become prohibitive.

The great field for aerial photographic mapping in the near future lies in filling in detail on maps heretofore completed as to general outlines, or, as in the war, on maps far out of date. The war-time procedure in country largely unknown, such as Mesopotamia, was probably closely that which will be necessary in peace. Conspicuous points in the landscape were first triangulated from friendly territory, and from these the outline map was drawn, whose details were to be supplied by aerial photographs. Much of the “mapping” of cross country aerial routes so far done is frankly of a pictorial nature, showing conspicuous landmarks and good landing fields—extremely valuable and useful, but not to be confused with precision mapping. In assembling mosaics of this kind the elaborate procedure described above is not followed. The process is the simple one of juxtaposing adjacent prints as accurately as possible by visual examination. Errors are of course cumulative, but as long as exact distances are not in question this is no matter.

Oblique views from the airplane are of very great value. While vertical views are more searching in many respects, they do nevertheless present an aspect of the earth with which ordinary human experience is unfamiliar. Consequently they are difficult to interpret without special training. They suffer, too, from the military standpoint, from the limitation that it is with vertical extension just as much as with horizontal that an army has to contend in its progress. Elevations and depressions of land show on an oblique view where they would be entirely missed in a vertical one. For illustration, study the picture of part of the outskirts of Arras (Fig. 144), presenting moat, walls and embankments, all of which would be serious obstacles, but would hardly be noticed on a vertical view. Pictures taken from directly overhead are eminently suited to artillery use, but oblique views of the territory to be attacked, taken from low altitudes, formed an essential part of the equipment of the infantry in the later stages of the war.

Pictorially, oblique views are undoubtedly the most satisfactory. The most revealing aspect of any object is not one side or face alone, but the view taken at an angle, showing portions of two or three sides. Best of all is that taken to show portions of front, side and top—the well-known but heretofore fictitious “bird's-eye view” (Fig. 145). This possibility is ordinarily denied the surface-of-the-earth photographer, but the proper vantage point is attained in the airplane.

Aerial obliques may be taken at any angle, although a distinction is sometimes made between obliques of high angle and panoramic or low angle views (Fig. 146). In addition to ordinary obliques, a very beautiful development is the stereo oblique. Both kinds of oblique photography call for special instrumental equipment and technique.

Methods and Apparatus for Oblique Photography.—The simplest method of taking oblique pictures from a plane is to use a hand camera pointed at the desired angle. Its limitations are in the size and scale of the picture obtainable, and in the inherent limitations to the method of camera support. A step in advance of this is to mount the camera above the fuselage, on the machine gun ring or turret, in place of the gun. Considerably greater rigidity is thus obtained, and heavier cameras can be utilized, although the wind resistance is a serious factor. Excellent obliques have been made in this way, even with 50-centimeter cameras, but the scheme is impractical in military planes, because of the removal of machine gun protection.

If the camera is fixed in the fuselage in its normal vertical position, obliques may be and have been taken by the simple expedient of banking the plane steeply. This is not to be recommended as a standard procedure, especially for taking a consecutive series of exposures.

The most satisfactory arrangements for taking obliques are two; first, to mount the camera obliquely in the plane, and second, to use a mirror or prism, in front or behind the lens of the vertically mounted camera. The first method has been employed chiefly by the French, the latter by the English, whose gravity fed cameras could not be mounted obliquely.

Taking up first the oblique mounting of cameras, we find two ways of doing this: longitudinal mounting and lateral mounting. In longitudinal mounting the camera projects forward and downward, usually from the nose of a pusher or bi-motored plane. With this form of mounting (Fig. 147) it is necessary of course to fly directly toward the objective. If this is a portion of enemy trench, which must be photographed from a height of 400 or 500 meters, the plane will be directly on top of its objective a few seconds after the exposure is made, and be a conspicuous target, in imminent danger of destruction. Moreover, only a single short section of the trench would be obtained for each crossing of the line. The one case where resort to this method is practically forced is with the 120-centimeter cameras which simply cannot be slung athwart the plane. There is a slight advantage in this method of carrying in that the motion of the image is less if the objective is approached, instead of being passed at the side, and so longer exposures can be made. The longitudinal mounting has, however, been very generally superseded by the lateral.

Methods for mounting cameras obliquely for taking pictures through the side of the plane have been discussed in detail in connection with camera mountings and installations (Fig. 93). The chief difficulties are want of space, obstacles at the side such as control wires and longerons, and failure of the camera to function properly at an angle. Even in the broad circular sectioned fuselage of the Salmson plane, quarters are so cramped that the French 50-centimeter camera when obliquely mounted cannot be used with the 12-plate magazine, and recourse is made to thin flat double plate-holders. Holes in the side of the fuselage should clear all wires and should command a view unobstructed by the wings—which often means that the camera must be carried behind the observer's cockpit, irrespective of the suitability of that space from other standpoints. Cameras dependent for their action on gravity, such as the deRam and English L type, are unsuited for oblique suspension.

For cameras which, because of their method of operation or shape cannot be slung obliquely, the only way to take obliques is to employ mirrors (Fig. 148) or prisms. These must be of the same optical quality as the photographic lens. They are both necessarily of considerable weight because they must be of large area of face to fill the entire aperture of an aerial lens. Mirrors are lighter than prisms, but must be quite thick to prevent distortion of the surface due to any possible strains to their mount. Right angle glass prisms have been used by the English with the 8 and 10 inch L cameras. The prisms were uniformly tilted to an angle of 12½ degrees from the horizontal.

Glass mirrors can be silvered either on the rear or front surface. If on the rear, both surfaces must be accurately parallel, which means much greater labor and expense than if the front surface can be utilized. The difficulty with front surface mirrors is that the metallic coating is easily tarnished or scratched, especially if silver is used, which is almost imperative, since all the other metals have considerably lower reflecting powers. (Gold might serve both as mirror and color filter, because of its yellow color.) Placing the mirror inside the camera body in part obviates this trouble, but means the use of a special elbow lens cone. In any case the mirror or prism occasions at least a 10 per cent. loss of light. Pictures taken by reflectors of any kind are reversed, and must either be printed in a camera, or on transparent film which may be viewed from the back.

The most usual condition for making obliques is to fly very low (300 to 600 meters), with the line of sight of the camera from 12 to 45 degrees from the horizontal. This low altitude necessitates very short exposures, to avoid movement of the image. The picture may be taken either the long or the short way of the plate, depending on the character of the object and the information desired. It is to be noted that successive oblique pictures cannot be mounted to form a continuous panorama—this being possible with obliques only if they are taken from one point, as from a captive balloon. If successive views are made on a straight flight at intervals so as to exactly juxtapose in the foreground, they overlap by a large margin the middle, and a point on the horizon, if that shows, will be in the same position in every picture. Mosaics of obliques could be made only by some system of conical mounting.

Sights for Oblique Photography.—Any of the sights previously discussed for vertical work, such as the tube sights, are applicable to obliques. They must, however, be suited for mounting at an angle, in a position convenient for the observer. In addition, provision must be made for adjusting the angle so that the lines of sight of camera and finder are parallel. Mounting outside the fuselage is practically the only feasible way, and is less objectionable with oblique than with vertical sights, as oblique sighting does not require the observer to stand up and lean over the edge of the cockpit. Windows in the side of the fuselage, either of celluloid or non-breakable glass, are a great aid to oblique observation. Marks upon the transparent surface can be utilized for the rear points of a sight of which the front point is a single fixed bead or rectangle.