The Project Gutenberg eBook of Amelia — Complete
Title: Amelia — Complete
Author: Henry Fielding
Release date: July 1, 2004 [eBook #6098]
Most recently updated: January 28, 2021
Language: English
Credits: Text file produced by Juliet Sutherland, Charles Franks and the
Online Distributed Proofreading Team
HTML file produced by David Widger
AMELIA
Complete
By Henry Fielding
Edited By George Saintsbury
MDCCCXCIII
CONTENTS
Chapter i. — Containing the exordium, &c.
Chapter iii. — Containing the inside of a prison.
Chapter iv. — Disclosing further secrets of the prison-house.
Chapter v. — Containing certain adventures which befel Mr. Booth in the prison.
Chapter vii. — In which Miss Matthews begins her history.
Chapter viii. — The history of Miss Matthews continued.
Chapter ix. — In which Miss Matthews concludes her relation.
Chapter x. — Table-talk, consisting of a facetious discourse that passed in the prison.
Chapter i. — In which Captain Booth begins to relate his history.
Chapter iii. — The narrative continued. More of the touchstone.
Chapter v. — Containing strange revolutions of fortune
Chapter vi. — Containing many surprising adventures.
Chapter vii. — The story of Booth continued.—More surprising adventures.
Chapter ix. — Containing a scene of a different kind from any of the preceding.
Chapter i. — In which Mr. Booth resumes his story.
Chapter ii. — Containing a scene of the tender kind.
Chapter iii. — In which Mr. Booth sets forward on his journey.
Chapter v. — The arrival of Booth at Gibraltar, with what there befel him.
Chapter vi. — Containing matters which will please some readers.
Chapter viii. — The story of Booth continued.
Chapter ix. — Containing very extraordinary matters.
Chapter x. — Containing a letter of a very curious kind.
Chapter xi. — In which Mr. Booth relates his return to England.
Chapter xii. — In which Mr. Booth concludes his story.
Chapter i. — Containing very mysterious matter.
Chapter ii. — The latter part of which we expect will please our reader better than the former.
Chapter iii. — Containing wise observations of the author, and other matters.
Chapter iv. — In which Amelia appears in no unamiable light.
Chapter v. — Containing an eulogium upon innocence, and other grave matters.
Chapter vi. — In which may appear that violence is sometimes done to the name of love.
Chapter vii. — Containing a very extraordinary and pleasant incident.
Chapter viii. — Containing various matters.
Chapter ix. — In which Amelia, with her friend, goes to the oratorio.
Chapter i. — In which the reader will meet with an old acquaintance.
Chapter ii. — In which Booth pays a visit to the noble lord.
Chapter iii. — Relating principally to the affairs of serjeant Atkinson.
Chapter iv. — Containing matters that require no preface.
Chapter v. — Containing much heroic matter.
Chapter vi. — In which the reader will find matter worthy his consideration.
Chapter vii. — Containing various matters.
Chapter viii. — The heroic behaviour of Colonel Bath.
Chapter ix. — Being the last chapter of the fifth book.
Chapter i. — Panegyrics on beauty, with other grave matters.
Chapter ii. — Which will not appear, we presume, unnatural to all married readers.
Chapter iii. — In which the history looks a little backwards.
Chapter iv. — Containing a very extraordinary incident.
Chapter v. — Containing some matters not very unnatural.
Chapter vi. — A scene in which some ladies will possibly think Amelia’s conduct exceptionable.
Chapter vii. — A chapter in which there is much learning.
Chapter viii. — Containing some unaccountable behaviour in Mrs. Ellison.
Chapter ix. — Containing a very strange incident.
Chapter i. — A very short chapter, and consequently requiring no preface.
Chapter ii. — The beginning of Mrs. Bennet’s history.
Chapter iii. — Continuation of Mrs. Bennet’s story.
Chapter iv. — Further continuation.
Chapter v. — The story of Mrs. Bennet continued.
Chapter vi. — Farther continued.
Chapter vii. — The story farther continued.
Chapter viii. — Further continuation.
Chapter ix. — The conclusion of Mrs. Bennet’s history.
Chapter x. — Being the last chapter of the seventh book.
Chapter i. — Being the first chapter of the eighth book.
Chapter ii. — Containing an account of Mr. Booth’s fellow-sufferers.
Chapter iii. — Containing some extraordinary behaviour in Mrs. Ellison.
Chapter iv. — Containing, among many matters, the exemplary behaviour of Colonel James.
Chapter v. — Comments upon authors.
Chapter vi. — Which inclines rather to satire than panegyric.
Chapter vii. — Worthy a very serious perusal.
Chapter viii. — Consisting of grave matters.
Chapter ix. — A curious chapter, from which a curious reader may draw sundry observations.
Chapter x. — In which are many profound secrets of philosophy.
Chapter i. — In which the history looks backwards.
Chapter ii. — In which the history goes forward.
Chapter iii. — A conversation between Dr Harrison and others.
Chapter iv. — A dialogue between Booth and Amelia.
Chapter v. — A conversation between Amelia and Dr Harrison, with the result.
Chapter vi. — Containing as surprizing an accident as is perhaps recorded in history.
Chapter viii. — In which two strangers make their appearance.
Chapter ix. — A scene of modern wit and humour.
Chapter i. — To which we will prefix no preface.
Chapter ii. — What happened at the masquerade.
Chapter iii. — Consequences of the masquerade, not uncommon nor surprizing.
Chapter iv. — Consequences of the masquerade.
Chapter v. — In which Colonel Bath appears in great glory.
Chapter vi. — Read, gamester, and observe.
Chapter vii. — In which Booth receives a visit from Captain Trent.
Chapter viii. — Contains a letter and other matters.
Chapter ix. — Containing some things worthy observation.
Chapter i. — Containing a very polite scene.
Chapter ii. — Matters political.
Chapter iii. — The history of Mr. Trent.
Chapter iv. — Containing some distress.
Chapter v. — Containing more wormwood and other ingredients.
Chapter vi. — A scene of the tragic kind.
Chapter vii. — In which Mr. Booth meets with more than one adventure.
Chapter viii. — In which Amelia appears in a light more amiable than gay.
Chapter ix. — A very tragic scene.
Chapter i. — The book begins with polite history.
Chapter ii. — In which Amelia visits her husband.
Chapter iii. — Containing matter pertinent to the history.
Chapter iv. — In which Dr Harrison visits Colonel James.
Chapter v. — What passed at the bailiff’s house.
Chapter vi. — What passed between the doctor and the sick man.
Chapter vii. — In which the history draws towards a conclusion.
Chapter viii. — Thus this history draws nearer to a conclusion.
Chapter ix. — In which the history is concluded.
INTRODUCTION.
Fielding’s third great novel has been the subject of much more discordant judgments than either of its forerunners. If we take the period since its appearance as covering four generations, we find the greatest authority in the earliest, Johnson, speaking of it with something more nearly approaching to enthusiasm than he allowed himself in reference to any other work of an author, to whom he was on the whole so unjust. The greatest man of letters of the next generation, Scott (whose attitude to Fielding was rather undecided, and seems to speak a mixture of intellectual admiration and moral dislike, or at least failure in sympathy), pronounces it “on the whole unpleasing,” and regards it chiefly as a sequel to Tom Jones, showing what is to be expected of a libertine and thoughtless husband. But he too is enthusiastic over the heroine. Thackeray (whom in this special connection at any rate it is scarcely too much to call the greatest man of the third generation) overflows with predilection for it, but chiefly, as it would seem, because of his affection for Amelia herself, in which he practically agrees with Scott and Johnson. It would be invidious, and is noways needful, to single out any critic of our own time to place beside these great men. But it cannot be denied that the book, now as always, has incurred a considerable amount of hinted fault and hesitated dislike. Even Mr. Dobson notes some things in it as “unsatisfactory;” Mr. Gosse, with evident consciousness of temerity, ventures to ask whether it is not “a little dull.” The very absence of episodes (on the ground that Miss Matthews’s story is too closely connected with the main action to be fairly called an episode) and of introductory dissertations has been brought against it, as the presence of these things was brought against its forerunners.
I have sometimes wondered whether Amelia pays the penalty of an audacity which, a priori, its most unfavourable critics would indignantly deny to be a fault. It begins instead of ending with the marriage-bells; and though critic after critic of novels has exhausted his indignation and his satire over the folly of insisting on these as a finale, I doubt whether the demand is not too deeply rooted in the English, nay, in the human mind, to be safely neglected. The essence of all romance is a quest; the quest most perennially and universally interesting to man is the quest of a wife or a mistress; and the chapters dealing with what comes later have an inevitable flavour of tameness, and of the day after the feast. It is not common now-a-days to meet anybody who thinks Tommy Moore a great poet; one has to encounter either a suspicion of Philistinism or a suspicion of paradox if one tries to vindicate for him even his due place in the poetical hierarchy. Yet I suspect that no poet ever put into words a more universal criticism of life than he did when he wrote “I saw from the beach,” with its moral of—
“Give me back, give me back, the wild freshness of morning—Her smiles and her tears are worth evening’s best light.”
If we discard this fallacy boldly, and ask ourselves whether Amelia is or is not as good as Joseph Andrews or Tom Jones, we shall I think be inclined to answer rather in the affirmative than in the negative. It is perhaps a little more easy to find fault with its characters than with theirs; or rather, though no one of these characters has the defects of Blifil or of Allworthy, it is easy to say that no one of them has the charm of the best personages of the earlier books. The idolaters of Amelia would of course exclaim at this sentence as it regards that amiable lady; and I am myself by no means disposed to rank amiability low in the scale of things excellent in woman. But though she is by no means what her namesake and spiritual grand-daughter. Miss Sedley, must, I fear, be pronounced to be, an amiable fool, there is really too much of the milk of human kindness, unrefreshed and unrelieved of its mawkishness by the rum or whisky of human frailty, in her. One could have better pardoned her forgiveness of her husband if she had in the first place been a little more conscious of what there was to forgive; and in the second, a little more romantic in her attachment to him. As it is, he was son homme; he was handsome; he had broad shoulders; he had a sweet temper; he was the father of her children, and that was enough. At least we are allowed to see in Mr. Booth no qualities other than these, and in her no imagination even of any other qualities. To put what I mean out of reach of cavil, compare Imogen and Amelia, and the difference will be felt.
But Fielding was a prose writer, writing in London in the eighteenth century, while Shakespeare was a poet writing in all time and all space, so that the comparison is luminous in more ways than one. I do not think that in the special scheme which the novelist set himself here he can be accused of any failure. The life is as vivid as ever; the minor sketches may be even called a little more vivid. Dr Harrison is not perfect. I do not mean that he has ethical faults, for that is a merit, not a defect; but he is not quite perfect in art. His alternate persecution and patronage of Booth, though useful to the story, repeat the earlier fault of Allworthy, and are something of a blot. But he is individually much more natural than Allworthy, and indeed is something like what Dr Johnson would have been if he had been rather better bred, less crotchety, and blessed with more health. Miss Matthews in her earlier scenes has touches of greatness which a thousand French novelists lavishing “candour” and reckless of exaggeration have not equalled; and I believe that Fielding kept her at a distance during the later scenes of the story, because he could not trust himself not to make her more interesting than Amelia. Of the peers, more wicked and less wicked, there is indeed not much good to be said. The peer of the eighteenth-century writers (even when, as in Fielding’s case, there was no reason why they should “mention him with Kor,” as Policeman X. has it) is almost always a faint type of goodness or wickedness dressed out with stars and ribbons and coaches-and-six. Only Swift, by combination of experience and genius, has given us live lords in Lord Sparkish and Lord Smart. But Mrs. Ellison and Mrs. Atkinson are very women, and the serjeant, though the touch of “sensibility” is on him, is excellent; and Dr Harrison’s country friend and his prig of a son are capital; and Bondum, and “the author,” and Robinson, and all the minor characters, are as good as they can be.
It is, however, usual to detect a lack of vivacity in the book, an evidence of declining health and years. It may be so; it is at least certain that Fielding, during the composition of Amelia, had much less time to bestow upon elaborating his work than he had previously had, and that his health was breaking. But are we perfectly sure that if the chronological order had been different we should have pronounced the same verdict? Had Amelia come between Joseph and Tom, how many of us might have committed ourselves to some such sentence as this: “In Amelia we see the youthful exuberances of Joseph Andrews corrected by a higher art; the adjustment of plot and character arranged with a fuller craftsmanship; the genius which was to find its fullest exemplification in Tom Jones already displaying maturity”? And do we not too often forget that a very short time—in fact, barely three years—passed between the appearance of Tom Jones and the appearance of Amelia? that although we do not know how long the earlier work had been in preparation, it is extremely improbable that a man of Fielding’s temperament, of his wants, of his known habits and history, would have kept it when once finished long in his desk? and that consequently between some scenes of Tom Jones and some scenes of Amelia it is not improbable that there was no more than a few months’ interval? I do not urge these things in mitigation of any unfavourable judgment against the later novel. I only ask—How much of that unfavourable judgment ought in justice to be set down to the fallacies connected with an imperfect appreciation of facts?
To me it is not so much a question of deciding whether I like Amelia less, and if so, how much less, than the others, as a question what part of the general conception of this great writer it supplies? I do not think that we could fully understand Fielding without it; I do not think that we could derive the full quantity of pleasure from him without it. The exuberant romantic faculty of Joseph Andrews and its pleasant satire; the mighty craftsmanship and the vast science of life of Tom Jones; the ineffable irony and logical grasp of Jonathan Wild, might have left us with a slight sense of hardness, a vague desire for unction, if it had not been for this completion of the picture. We should not have known (for in the other books, with the possible exception of Mrs. Fitzpatrick, the characters are a little too determinately goats and sheep) how Fielding could draw nuances, how he could project a mixed personage on the screen, if we had not had Miss Matthews and Mrs. Atkinson—the last especially a figure full of the finest strokes, and, as a rule, insufficiently done justice to by critics.
And I have purposely left to the last a group of personages about whom indeed there has been little question, but who are among the triumphs of Fielding’s art—the two Colonels and their connecting-link, the wife of the one and the sister of the other. Colonel Bath has necessarily united all suffrages. He is of course a very little stagey; he reminds us that his author had had a long theatrical apprenticeship: he is something too much d’une piece. But as a study of the brave man who is almost more braggart than brave, of the generous man who will sacrifice not only generosity but bare justice to “a hogo of honour,” he is admirable, and up to his time almost unique. Ordinary writers and ordinary readers have never been quite content to admit that bravery and braggadocio can go together, that the man of honour may be a selfish pedant. People have been unwilling to tell and to hear the whole truth even about Wolfe and Nelson, who were both favourable specimens of the type; but Fielding the infallible saw that type in its quiddity, and knew it, and registered it for ever.
Less amusing but more delicately faithful and true are Colonel James and his wife. They are both very good sort of people in a way, who live in a lax and frivolous age, who have plenty of money, no particular principle, no strong affection for each other, and little individual character. They might have been—Mrs. James to some extent is—quite estimable and harmless; but even as it is, they are not to be wholly ill spoken of. Being what they are, Fielding has taken them, and, with a relentlessness which Swift could hardly have exceeded, and a good-nature which Swift rarely or never attained, has held them up to us as dissected preparations of half-innocent meanness, scoundrelism, and vanity, such as are hardly anywhere else to be found. I have used the word “preparations,” and it in part indicates Fielding’s virtue, a virtue shown, I think, in this book as much as anywhere. But it does not fully indicate it; for the preparation, wet or dry, is a dead thing, and a museum is but a mortuary. Fielding’s men and women, once more let it be said, are all alive. The palace of his work is the hall, not of Eblis, but of a quite beneficent enchanter, who puts burning hearts into his subjects, not to torture them, but only that they may light up for us their whole organisation and being. They are not in the least the worse for it, and we are infinitely the better.
{Illustration.}
{Illustration.}
DEDICATION.
To RALPH ALLEN, ESQ.
SIR,—The following book is sincerely designed to promote the cause of virtue, and to expose some of the most glaring evils, as well public as private, which at present infest the country; though there is scarce, as I remember, a single stroke of satire aimed at any one person throughout the whole.
The best man is the properest patron of such an attempt. This, I believe, will be readily granted; nor will the public voice, I think, be more divided to whom they shall give that appellation. Should a letter, indeed, be thus inscribed, DETUR OPTIMO, there are few persons who would think it wanted any other direction.
I will not trouble you with a preface concerning the work, nor endeavour to obviate any criticisms which can be made on it. The good-natured reader, if his heart should be here affected, will be inclined to pardon many faults for the pleasure he will receive from a tender sensation: and for readers of a different stamp, the more faults they can discover, the more, I am convinced, they will be pleased.
Nor will I assume the fulsome stile of common dedicators. I have not their usual design in this epistle, nor will I borrow their language. Long, very long may it be before a most dreadful circumstance shall make it possible for any pen to draw a just and true character of yourself without incurring a suspicion of flattery in the bosoms of the malignant. This task, therefore, I shall defer till that day (if I should be so unfortunate as ever to see it) when every good man shall pay a tear for the satisfaction of his curiosity; a day which, at present, I believe, there is but one good man in the world who can think of it with unconcern.
Accept then, sir, this small token of that love, that gratitude, and that respect, with which I shall always esteem it my GREATEST HONOUR to be,
Sir, Your most obliged, and most obedient humble servant,
HENRY
FIELDING.
Bow Street, Dec. 2, 1751.
{Illustration.}