WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
An economic interpretation of the Constitution of the United States cover

An economic interpretation of the Constitution of the United States

Chapter 2: PREFACE
Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

About This Book

This work examines the economic interests that influenced the drafting and adoption of the Constitution in 1787. It posits that social progress arises from the conflict of various societal interests, some of which supported the new Constitution while others opposed it. The study identifies the social classes and groups present in the United States at that time, analyzing how their economic stakes shaped their support for the new governmental framework. By focusing on the material conditions and property interests of these groups, the author provides an interpretation of the Constitution that emphasizes the role of economic factors in political change.

PREFACE

The following pages are frankly fragmentary. They are designed to suggest new lines of historical research rather than to treat the subject in an exhaustive fashion. This apology is not intended as an anticipation of the criticism of reviewers, but as a confession of fact. No one can appreciate more fully than I do how much of the work here outlined remains to be done. The records of the Treasury Department at Washington, now used for the first time in connection with a study of the formation of the Constitution, furnish a field for many years’ research, to say nothing of the other records, printed and unprinted, which throw light upon the economic conditions of the United States between 1783–1787.

If it be asked why such a fragmentary study is printed now, rather than held for the final word, my explanation is brief. I am unable to give more than an occasional period to uninterrupted studies, and I cannot expect, therefore, to complete within a reasonable time the survey which I have made here. Accordingly, I print it in the hope that a few of this generation of historical scholars may be encouraged to turn away from barren “political” history to a study of the real economic forces which condition great movements in politics.

Students already familiar with the field here surveyed will discover that I have made full use of the suggestive work already done by Professor Turner, Drs. Libby, Ambler, and Schaper.

I am indebted to Mr. Merwin of the Treasury Department for his great courtesy in making available the old records under his jurisdiction; to Mr. Bishop, of the Library of Congress, for facilitating the examination of thousands of pamphlets as well as for other favors; and to Mr. Fitzpatrick, of the Manuscript Division, for keeping his good humor while bringing out hundreds of manuscripts which seemed to yield results wholly out of proportion to the labor entailed.

I am under deep obligation to two friends, nameless here, without whose generous sympathy and encouragement, this volume could not have been written.

CHARLES A. BEARD.
Washington, D.C.,
February, 1913.