WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
Ancient and modern engineering and the Isthmian canal cover

Ancient and modern engineering and the Isthmian canal

Chapter 24: CHAPTER XIX.
Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

About This Book

A series of six lectures reworked for publication surveys civil engineering from ancient to modern times, outlining hydraulic and structural achievements in Mesopotamia and Egypt, Roman roads, aqueducts, harbors, and practical rules of ancient practice. It then follows the evolution of bridges and contemporary theory, treating stresses, materials, construction methods, and mechanical appliances. The closing sections compare proposed interoceanic canal routes across the Central American isthmus, notably Nicaragua and Panama, evaluating topography, alignment, water supply, lock versus sea-level schemes, and constructability using photographic illustrations and technical analysis.

CHAPTER XIX.

205. Distributing-reservoirs and their Capacities.—The water of a public supply seldom runs from the storage-reservoir directly into the distributing system or is pumped directly into it, although such practices may in some cases be permissible for small towns or cities. Generally distributing-reservoirs are provided either in or immediately adjacent to the distributing system of pipes, meaning the water-pipes large and small which are laid through the streets of a city or town, and the service-pipes leading from the latter directly to the consumers.

The capacity ordinarily given to these distributing-reservoirs is not controlled by any rigid rule, but depends upon the local circumstances of each case. If they are of masonry and covered with masonry arches, as required for the reception of some filtered waters, they are made as small as practicable on account of their costs. If, on the contrary, they are open and formed of suitably constructed embankments, like the distributing-reservoirs of New York City in Central Park and at High Bridge, they are and should be of much greater capacity. The storage volume of the High Bridge reservoir amounts to 11,000,000 gallons, while that of the Central Park reservoir is 1,000,000,000 gallons. Again, the capacity of the old receiving-basin in Central Park is 200,000,000 gallons. These reservoirs act also as equalizers against the varying draft on the system during the different portions of the day and furnish all desired storage for the demands of fire-streams, which, while it lasts, may be a demand at a high rate. It may be approximately stated under ordinary circumstances that the capacity of distributing-reservoirs for a given system should equal from two or three to eight or ten days supply. It is advantageous to approach the upper of those limits when practicable. The volume of water retained in these reservoirs acts in some cases as a needed storage, while repairs of pumping-machinery or other exigencies may temporarily stop the flow into them. The larger their capacity the more effectively will such exigencies be met.

206. System of Distributing Mains and Pipes.—Gate-houses must be placed at the distributing-reservoirs within which are found and operated the requisite gates controlling the supply into the reservoir and the outflow from it into the distributing system. The latter begins at the distributing-reservoir where there may be one or two or more large mains, usually of cast-iron. These mains conduct the water into the branching system of pipes which forms a network over the entire city or town. A few lines of large pipes are laid so as to divide the total area to be supplied into convenient portions served by pipes of smaller diameter leading from the larger, so that practically every street shall carry its line or lines of piping from which every resident or user may draw the desired supply. Obviously, as a rule, the further the beginning of the distributing system is departed from in following out the ramifications of the various lines the smaller will the diameter of pipe become. The smallest cast-iron pipe of a distributing system is seldom less than 3 inches, and sometimes not less than 4 or 6 inches. There should be no dead ends in any distributing system. By a dead end is meant the end of a line of pipes, which is closed so that no water circulates through it. Whenever a branch pipe ceases it should be extended so as to connect with some other pipe in the system in order to induce circulation. The entire distributing system should therefore, in its extreme as well as central portions, constitute an interlaced system and not a series of closed ends. This is essential for the purity and potability of the water-supply. A circulation in all parts of the entire system is essential and it should be everywhere secured.

The diagram shows a portion of the distributing system of the city of New York. It will be noticed that there is a complete connection of the outlying portions, so as to make the interlacing and corresponding circulation as complete and active as possible.

Fig. 4.—New York City Distributing System.

207. Diameters of and Velocities in Distributing Mains and Pipes.—In laying out a distributing system it will not be possible to base the diameters at different points on close computations for velocity or discharges based upon considerations of friction or other resistances, as the conditions under which the pipes are found are too complicated to make such a method workable. Approximate estimates may be made as to the number of consumers to be supplied at a given section of a main pipe, and consequently what the diameter should be to pass the required daily supply so that the velocity may not exceed certain maximum limits known to be advisable. Such estimates may be made at a considerable number of what may be termed critical points of the system, and the diameters may be ascertained in that manner with sufficient accuracy. In this field of hydraulics a sound engineering judgment, based upon experience, is a very important element, as it is in a great many other engineering operations.

It will follow from these considerations that as a rule the larger diameters of pipe in a given distributing system will belong to the greater lengths, and it will be found that the velocities of water in the various parts of a system will seldom exceed the following limits, which, although stated with some precision, are to be regarded only as approximate:

For  4 -inch pipe 23 feet per second.
 6 23
 8 17
11 12
12 12
16  9
20  8
24  7
30  7
36  7
48  7
60  7

208. Required Pressures in Mains and Pipes.—In designing distributing systems it is very essential so to apportion the pipes as to secure the requisite pressure at the various street services. Like many other features of a water-supply system no exact rules can be given, but it may be stated that at the street-level a pressure of at least 20 to 30 pounds should be found in resident districts, and from 30 to 35 or 40 pounds in business districts. The character and height of buildings affect these pressures to a large extent. Old pipe systems usually have many weak points, and while pressures requisite to carry water to the top of three- or four-story buildings are needed, any great excess above that would be apt to cause breaks and result in serious leakages. If the distributing system is one in which the pressure for fire-streams is to be found at the hydrants, then greater pressures than those named must be provided. In such cases the pressures in pipes at the hydrants should range from 60 to 100 pounds.

209. Fire-hydrants.—Fire-hydrants must be placed usually at street corners, if the blocks are not too long, and so distributed as to control with facility the entire district in which they are found. Unless fire-engines are used to create their own pressure, the lower the pressure at the hydrant the nearer together the hydrants must be placed. It is obvious, however, that when the pressure of the system is depended upon for fire-streams it is desirable to have the pressure comparatively high, so far as the hydrants are concerned, as under those conditions they may be placed farther apart and a less number will be required.

210. Elements of Distributing Systems.—The following table gives a number of statistics, exhibiting the elements of the distributing system of a considerable number of cities, including some pumping and meter data pertinent to the costs of pumping on the one hand and the extension of the use of meters on the other.

It contains information of no little practical value in connection with the administration of the distributing systems and the consumption of water in it. This table has been compiled by Mr. Chas. W. Sherman of the New England Water-works Association, and was published in the proceedings of that association for September, 1901. The service-pipes, varying from ½ to 10 inches in diameter, are of cast-iron, wrought-iron, lead, galvanized iron, tin-lined, rubber-lined, cement-lined, enamelled and tarred, the practice varying widely not only from one city to another, but in the same city.

TABLE XIX

  • LEGEND:
  • (A) = Kind of Pipe.
  • (B) = Size of Pipe. Ins
  • (C) = Total Length in Use, Miles.
  • (D) = Cost of Repairs per Mile.
  • (E) = Total Number of Hydrants in Use.
Name of City or Town. (A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
Albany, N. Y.     129.7   808
Atlantic City, N. J. C.I. 4-20 47.6   519
Boston, Mass. C.I. 2-48 713.4  27.09  7606
Burilngton, Vt. C.I. 4-30 38.0 4.61 213
C.I.
W.I.
Cambridge, Mass.         968
Chelsea, Mass. C.I. 6-16 37.8   253
Concord, N. H. C.I. 4-30 60.2   267
C.I.
Fall River, Mass. C.I. 6-24 87.3   954
Fitchburg, Mass. C.I. 2-20 66.6   499
Holyoke, Mass. C.I. ½-30 81.6 5.14 860
W.I.
Lowell, Mass.     127.8   1098
Lynn, Mass. W.I. 2-20   129.4 952
C.I.
C.I.
Madison, Wis. C.I. 4-16 34.3   169
Manchester, N. H. C.I. 4-20 96.9   743
C.I.
Metropolitan
Water-works
Owned by C.I. 6-60 69.8    
C.I.
Tot. Sup. by C.I. 4-60  1360.3     11913
C.I.
Kal.
Minneapolis, Minn. C.I.  1¼-50  269.2   3172
 Steel. 
New Bedford, Mass. C.I. 4-36 92.7 24.00 738
New London, Conn. W.I. 4-24 50.5 18.71 258
C.I.
C.I.
Newton, Mass. C.I. 4-20 136.6 6.43 935
Providence, R. I. C.I. 6-36 324.6 0.56 1886
H.P. Fire System  C.I. 12-24 5.6   92
Quincy, Mass. W.I. 1-36 144.7 5.50  955 †
C.I.
C.I.
Springfield, Mass. C.I. 2-20 84.1   539
Kal.
Woonsocket, R. I. C.I. 4-20 45.8 3.57 548
Yonkers, N. Y.     74.1   771
Worcester, Mass.   2-40 173.5   1763

† Public hydrants only.

TABLE XIX.(continued)

  • LEGEND:
  • (F) = Total Number of Gates in Use.
  • (G) = Range of Pressure on Mains at Centre, Pounds.
  • (H) = Size of Service-pipe in Inches.
  • (I) = Total Number of Service-taps in Use.
  • (J) = Total Number of Meters in Use.
  • (K) = Total Pumpage for the Year in Gallons.
  • (L) = Average Static Head against which Pumps Work, Feet.
Name of City or Town. (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L)
Albany, N. Y. 803       2030    
Atlantic City, N. J.     ½-4 4,249 3298 955,726,046 81.7
148,662,947 119.5
Boston, Mass. 8910 40-90 ½-8 87,525 4516    
Burlington, Vt. 618 70-85 ½-6 3,350 2311 312,896,525 289
Cambridge, Mass. 399 48-50 ⅝-2 14,207 860 2,651,277,240  
6,146 104
Chelsea, Mass. 757     3,340 1010 142,772,165  
Concord, N. H. 940 80 ½-2 6,943 6,544 1,388,776,336 186.2
Fall River, Mass. 554 75 L.S ¾-8 4,432 2,427    
155 H.S.
Fitchburg, Mass. 734 80-100 ⅝-4 3,610 210    
Holyoke, Mass. 1188     10,634 5,586 2,042,066,140 156.1
Lowell, Mass. 966 45-60 ¾-4 13,504 2,571 378,782,675  
1,330,784,875
Lynn, Mass. 234     2,758 2,586 306,637,454 223.8
Madison, Wis. 910   ½-6 5,513 3,667    
Manchester, N. H.              
Metropolitan
Water-works
268     134,496 10,385 15,027,410,000(a)  
9,431,140,000(b)
2,015,130,000(c)
Minneapolis, Minn. 2195   ⅝-1 20,064 5,030 6,863,135,200  
New Bedford, Mass. 1065 28-64 ½-10 9,280 1,429 2,307,429,372 167.2
New London, Conn. 318 40-48 ½-4 3,088 229    
Newton, Mass. 801 84 ½-6 7,087 6,001 762,876,073 234
Providence, R. I. 3399 64-73 ½-10 21,566 17,813 3,833,243,445 171.6
34,401,038 172.4
 ” H.P. Fire System 31 114       578,940,480 111.2
Quincy, Mass. 1889 30-35 H.S 1-6 9,764 3,122    
100-120 L.S.†
Springfield, Mass. 1001 78-85 ⅝-3 4,330 122    
Woonsocket, R. I. 456 50-120 ⅝-6 2,193 1,889 340,849,628 237.6
Yonkers, N. Y. 498   ¼-8 4,968 4,852 1,323,696,099  
Worcester, Mass. 2432 70 L.S.   13,292 12,529    
150 H.S.†

† Public hydrants only.

  • C.L. = cement-lined.
  • (a) = Chestnut Hill high service.
  • (b) = Chestnut Hill low service.
  • (c) = Spot Pond Pumping-station.

TABLE XIX.(continued)

  • LEGEND:
  • (M) = Average Dynamic Head against which Pumps Work, Feet.
  • (N) = Duty in Foot-pounds per 100 Pounds of Coal. No Deductions.
Name of City or Town. Kind of
Pipe.
Size of
Pipe.
(M) (N)
Albany, N. Y. .. .. .. ..
Atlantic City, N. J. C.I. 4-20 123.3 36,501,217
119.5 15,518,455
Boston, Mass. C.I. 2-48 .. ..
Burlington, Vt. C.I. 4-30 316 ..
C.I.
W.I.
Cambridge, Mass. .. .. .. ..
Chelsea, Mass. C.I. 6-16 .. ..
Concord, N. H. C.I. 4-30 .. ..
C.I.
Fall River, Mass. C.I. 6-24 .. ..
Fitchburg, Mass. C.I. 2-20 .. ..
Holyoke, Mass. C.I. ½-30 .. ..
W.I.
Lowell, Mass. .. .. 163.9 93,489,048
Lynn, Mass. W.I. 2-20 167
167
88,780,036
87,265,319
C.I.
C.I.
Madison, Wis. C.I. 4-16 242.4 47,530,839
Manchester, N. H. C.I. 4-20 .. ..
C.I.
Metropolitan Owned by C.I. 6-60  96.5  121,800,000
C.I.
Water-works Tot. Sup. by C.I. 4-60  51.8
125.6
109,380,000
 80,400,000
C.I.
Kal.
Minneapolis, Minn. C.I. ½-50 .. 68,016,609
Steel.
New Bedford, Mass. C.I. 4-36 192 130,336,508
New London, Conn. W.I. 4-24 .. ..
C.I.
C.I.
Newton, Mass. C.I. 4-20 254 72,500,000
Providence, R. I. C.I. 6-36 176.9 101,301,600
177.7 60,329,100
124.7 68,533,300
H.P. Fire System  C.I. 12-24 .. ..
Quincy, Mass. C.I. 2-20 .. ..
Kal.
Springfield, Mass. W.I. 1-36 .. ..
C.I.
C.I.
Woonsocket, R. I. C.I. 4-20 239.5 51,024,641
Yonkers, N. Y. .. .. .. ..
Worcester, Mass. .. 2-40 .. ..

TABLE XIX.(continued)

  • LEGEND:
  • (O) = Cost per Million Gallons raised 1 Foot High.
  • Pumping-station Expenses.
  • (P) = Cost per Million Gallons raised 1 Foot High.
  • Figured on Total Maintenance.
  • (R) = Rate of Interest Per Cent.
Name of City or Town. (O) (P) Net Cost
of Works
to Date.
Bonded
Debt
at Date.
Value of
Sinking Fund
at Date.
(R)
Albany, N. Y. .. $0.264 $916,723.59 $892,000 $100,407.01 4½-5
Atlantic City, N. J. .. ..  23,054,387.81  11,960,272 10,144,647.08 3½-6
Boston, Mass. 0.08 0.366 468,039.73 248,000 64,076.40 3½-4
Burlington, Vt. .. .. 5,670,229.52 3,302,100 604,326.58  
Cambridge, Mass. .. .. 483,335.52 300,000 50,921  
Chelsea, Mass. .. .. 857,440.98 650,000    
Concord, N. H. .. .. 1,937,862.93 1,920,000 581,647.78 5.1
Fall River, Mass. .. .. 452,091.09 648,000 195,908.91  
Fitchburg, Mass. .. .. 1,244,742.23 300,000 37,403.46 4
Holyoke, Mass. 0.0399 .. .. 1,274,700 287,226.20  
Lowell, Mass. 0.042 0.51 2,472,821.85 1,800,300 524,027.50 3½-5
Lynn, Mass. 0.159 .. 37,630.13      
Madison, Wis. .. .. 1,513.012.79 900,000 159,466.83 4-6
Metropolitan 
Water-works 
Owned by  0.0314           
Tot. Sup. by 0.032          
Minneapolis, Minn. 0.043          
New Bedford, Mass. 0.033          
New London, Conn. 0.0259 0.2867 1,820,107.73 558,000 148,793.77 av. 4.44
Newton, Mass. .. .. 706,978.44 410,000 .. 3.5-4
Providence, R. I. 0.05 0.59 2,034,808.07 2,075,000 849,115.40 av. 4.7
H.P. Fire-system  .. L.S. = 0.0259 6,470,093.35 5,920,000 713,431.62 av. 3.7
Quincy, Mass. ..  H.S. = 0.1134        
Springfield, Mass. .. .. .. 720,500 .. 4
Woonsocket, R. I. .. .. 2,128,559.56 1,500,000 461,861.90 av. 5.9
Yonkers, N. Y. 0.061 0.37 390,841.78      
Worcester, Mass. .. .. 1,577,105.15 1,475,000 310,700 3.5-7