WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
Bacon and Shakespeare cover

Bacon and Shakespeare

Chapter 27: Transcriber’s Notes
Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

About This Book

A critical examination of the claim that Francis Bacon authored the plays traditionally attributed to Shakespeare, surveying the personalities, published works, and historical records of both men. The author tests Baconian arguments and ciphers, scrutinizes proponents' methods and alleged cryptographic revelations, contrasts stylistic and temperamental evidence, and traces the development of authorship theories. Case studies address claimed parallels, proposed collaborations, and biographical misconceptions about the playwright. The work concludes by weighing documented facts and interpretive leaps, arguing that the balance of evidence supports the conventional attribution while exposing persistent fallacies in Baconian reasoning.

Transcriber’s Notes

Punctuation, hyphenation, and spelling were made consistent when a predominant preference was found in this book; otherwise they were not changed.

Simple typographical errors were corrected; occasional unbalanced quotation marks retained.

Ambiguous hyphens at the ends of lines were retained.

Page 37: Paragraph beginning “In spite, however, of all positive evidence to the contrary” contains an unbalanced quotation mark.

Page 56: Removed an unmatched single quotation mark just before “the” in “Imagine Juliet as the party, loved”.

Page 63: Paragraph beginning “The inaccurately described bi-literal cipher” contains an unbalanced quotation mark.

Page 69: Closing quotation mark added at the end of the two-line verse beginning with “So long as men can breathe, or eyes”.

Page 99: Paragraph beginning “Even at the risk of wearying my readers” contains an unbalanced quotation mark near the end of the paragraph.

Page 119: Paragraph beginning “Spedding, himself a genius” ends with an unbalanced quotation mark.