WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
Baptism as taught in the Bible and the Prayer Book cover

Baptism as taught in the Bible and the Prayer Book

Chapter 8: FOOTNOTES.
Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

About This Book

A clerical exposition compares the Church of England baptismal liturgy with New Testament teaching to determine what inward blessing baptism signifies and how that blessing is related to the outward rite. Arguing from New Testament passages, the author concludes that baptism is connected with an inward union with Christ wrought by the Holy Spirit, which brings a changed standing before God and a transformed heart. The work outlines those two consequences, discusses how Scripture portrays the sacrament as sign and means of spiritual incorporation, and addresses common controversies about regeneration and the nature of the baptismal connection.

 
 

J. FLETCHER, PRINTER, NORWICH.

 

ADVERTISEMENT.

BY REV. E. HOARE.

CONFORMITY TO THE WORLD.  Price 6d.  Second Edition.

THE COMMUNION AND COMMUNICANT.  Price 3s. a doz.  Third Edition.

INSPIRATION, ITS NATURE AND EXTENT.  Price 6d.

THE JESUITS.  Price 6d.  Second Edition.

BY MRS. E. HOARE.

THE CHRISTIAN MOTHER: or Notes for Mothers’ Meetings.

 

LONDON: HATCHARD & CO., 187, PICCADILLY, W.
MRS. HASTING, Pew Office, Tunbridge Wells.

FOOTNOTES.

[29]  The rubric at the close of the baptismal service is sometimes quoted in opposition to the above statements.  “It is certain from God’s word, that children which are baptized, dying before they commit actual sin, are undoubtedly saved.”  From this it is argued, that the Church does enter into the particular case of infants, and teach their invariable regeneration.  “If saved,” it is said, “they must be justified—and if justified regenerate.  Hence, as the Church declares all dying children to be saved, she teaches thereby that all baptized children are regenerate.”  The unsoundness of such an argument is best seen by following it to its conclusions: for it would be quite as sound reasoning to say that if justified they must be believers, and if believers, possessed of judgment and responsibility.  The fallacy lies in this: it is taken for granted that God applies the saving blood of Christ in the same way, and the same way alone, to unconscious infants and responsible adults.  As there is no foundation for this in Scripture, the whole argument falls to the ground.  Would that churchmen were content to follow the example of our Church, to accept the assurance of infant salvation without straining it into a system, or attempting to define what God has left unrevealed!