There are many and good reasons for believing that water-fowl hatched and reared in the parks would, if they went away for a period in autumn and winter, return in spring to breed. A fair trial might be made by giving the eggs of wild birds—widgeon, teal, gadwell, shoveller, and other suitable British species, to the park ducks when breeding. In this way a London race of each or of a few of these species might be established; like our black-headed gulls, moorhens, and dabchicks, they would be wild birds, although not shy, and they would certainly be more beautiful and vigorous and give us more pleasure than their pinioned relations. Coots hatched and reared by the moorhens would give us another wild bird well suited to thrive in the park lakes; and I will venture to add that we might even get the great crested grebe, by placing its eggs in the dabchicks’ nests. The breeding habits of these two species are identical; they differ very considerably in size, but there is not so great a disparity between little grebe and great grebe as there is between the cuckoo and its foster-parent.
Of small birds, or songsters, it will not be necessary to mention more than a few of the species which might be introduced with advantage, since little can be done so long as the bird-killing cats are free of the parks, and little will need to be done once the cats are excluded. Such species as the robin and hedge-sparrow require protection when breeding; they are now dying out for want of it, and will undoubtedly increase again whenever the park authorities think proper to give it.
The quickest and most effective plan to add to the number of our species is to procure the eggs of suitable wild birds, to be hatched in the nests of the park birds. Thus, the missel-thrush might easily be got back by placing its eggs in the nests of blackbirds and thrushes. The large size and handsome plumage of the missel-thrush, or storm-cock, his dashing motions and loud winter song, would make him one of our most attractive birds; and that he is well able to thrive in London we have already seen.
Another bird which no one is ever tired of seeing and hearing, and would be a great acquisition, is the nuthatch; this species, although not uncommon on the wooded borders of London and in some of the outlying parks, would no doubt have to be introduced by man. The nuthatch is a difficult bird to manage, on account of its violent temper and impatience of confinement; but it is possible that the starling, which, like the nuthatch, breeds in hollow trees, and feeds its young on much the same kind of food, might make a suitable foster-parent. At all events, the experiment is worth trying. It should be easy to procure its eggs, as the bird is very common in many well-timbered parks and open oak woods within a short distance of London. There are, I imagine, few small birds more fitted to give pleasure to Londoners than the nuthatch, on account of his quaint figure and pretty plumage, his sprightliness and amusing squirrel-like movements on a trunk or branch of a tree. Though not strictly a songster, his various clear penetrative call-notes are very delightful to hear; and he is most loquacious in late winter and early spring, when bird-voices are few. Furthermore, of wild birds that may be taught to come to us for food he is one of the quickest to learn, and will follow his feeder, or come at call, and deftly catch the nuts and crusts and fragments of any kind that are thrown to him.
Two other small birds with loud bright voices—both London species, but now very nearly vanished, as we have seen—are the oxeye and wren. I think the best plan with regard to these two—and the same plan might be tried with the nuthatch in the event of the starling’s failure as a foster-parent—would be to catch the young birds shortly after leaving the nest, and release them as soon as possible in the parks. All these three have the habit of roosting in families, old and young together, in a hole or other sheltered place; and if taken at night and released the following day where they were wanted, they would probably soon adapt themselves to their new surroundings.
The wren, indeed, appears to have more adaptiveness than most birds, being universal in the British Islands, and able to survive the cold and scarcity of the long northern winters, even in the most bleak and barren situations. That he is well able to thrive in London we know, in spite of the fact that he has now all but vanished from most of our open spaces; for we have seen that in one park, within two miles of Charing Cross, where he is more encouraged and better protected than elsewhere, he is actually increasing in number. He is a delightful little bird, a very general favourite, and is a winter singer with a bright, beautiful, lyrical song, wonderfully loud for so tiny a creature. I was never more impressed with the loudness of its song than on one Sunday afternoon in the spring of 1897 in Battersea Park. I was walking with the park superintendent round the lake, listening for some new summer voice, but for some time no bird sound reached us. Fifty or sixty boats full of noisy rowers were on the water, and the walks were thronged with loudly talking and laughing people, their numberless feet tramping on the gravel paths producing a sound like that of a steam roller. My companion exclaimed impatiently that it was impossible to hear a bird-note in so much noise. He had scarcely spoken before a wren, quite fifty yards away, somewhere on the island opposite to us, burst out singing, and his bright lyric rang forth loud and clear and perfect above all that noise of the holiday crowd.
It would be extremely difficult, perhaps impossible, to introduce by artificial means any of the summer visitants in the absence of soft-billed birds to play the part of foster-parents. The hedge-sparrow, the best bird for such a task, is too rare; should he increase again, the case will be different. At the same time it may be said that the better protection which alone would cause the hedge-sparrow and robin to increase would also attract the migrants to breed in the parks. At present, the summer songsters that come regularly to breed in various spots on the borders of London are the following: whinchat, stonechat, redstart, nightingale, whitethroat, lesser-whitethroat, blackcap, garden warbler, chiffchaff, willow-wren, wood-wren, sedge-warbler, reed-warbler, pied wagtail, and tree-pipit. All these species, excepting the wood-wren, visit the open spaces of inner London on migration in spring. The chats, redstart, and tree-pipit are much rarer than the others; but of the fourteen species named, at least eight can be seen or heard by any person who cares to spend two or three days in the parks, to watch and listen to the birds, after the middle of April. This list is limited to the species which I have no doubt would breed in the parks if encouraged; the three species of swallows, the wheatear, yellow wagtail, and other summer visitants are also seen in April in London, but these are simply passing through.
The kingfisher, singly and in pairs, has been a rather frequent visitor to the parks during the last two years, and in some instances has made a long stay: there is no doubt that the abundance of minnows in the ornamental waters and the shelter of the wooded islands are a great attraction. No instance of its attempting to breed has yet occurred, but this may be due to the want of a suitable place to nest in. It is possible that the noise of the Saturday and Sunday boating people in the larger lakes, and the persecution of the sparrows, who hate him for his brilliant dress, may drive him away; still, it would be a good plan to construct an artificial bank or rockery, with breeding holes, on one of the islands at a suitable place like Battersea.
The hard-billed birds would no doubt be the easiest to introduce, owing to the large number of sparrows that nest in the park trees, from which the eggs could be taken and those of other species substituted; and if by acting as foster-parents to other finches the sparrows would only be breeding crows to pick their own eyes out, as the proverb says, so much the better. Chaffinches and greenfinches have been successfully reared by sparrows; and to these two other equally desirable species might be added: yellowhammer, corn-bunting, reed-bunting, bullfinch, goldfinch, and linnet. These are charming birds and good songsters; even the corn-bunting, although generally belittled by its biographers, is, compared with the sparrow, an accomplished musician. They are furthermore all exceedingly hardy, and probably as well able to thrive in London as the sparrow itself, although not so prolific and pushing as that sometimes troublesome bird. It is, indeed, on account of their hardiness that they, or those of them that have the best voices, are so much sought after; for they will live and be lively, and sing, for a period of ten or a dozen years, even in the miserable prison of a little cage in which they are kept by those who love them.
The excessive numbers of sparrows in the parks, where, as we have seen, there is no natural check on their increase, is a question difficult to deal with, and no remedy that is not somewhat unpleasant to think of has yet been tried or suggested. In some of the parks the nests are pulled down by the hundred; but where this plan is followed it is said to be of little avail, owing to the energy and persistence of the birds in making fresh nests. In other parks the birds are, or have been, netted at night in the bushes, where they roost in crowds. Poisoning the sparrows has also probably been tried; at all events, in one park I have found the sparrows looking sick and languishing, and many dead birds lying about, as if an epidemic had broken out among them; but as no signs of disease could be detected in the birds outside the park, it could not very well have been an epidemic.
Now since all these methods, which, like the little spasmodic attempts to kill the cats in some of the parks, are practised in secrecy and fear lest the public should hear of them, have so far proved ineffectual, would it not be best to take a lesson from Nature, and restore some of the natural checks which we have taken away? Let us in the first place make use of the park sparrows in establishing colonies of as many new or greatly diminished species as possible; and when we have done this, let us further introduce, in moderate numbers, such species as prey on small birds and their eggs and young—peregrine falcon, kestrel, sparrow-hawk, owl, crow, daw, magpie, and jay.
However successful we may be in adding to the number of our songsters, the sparrow will always be more numerous than all the other species together, and on account of his abundance he will be more preyed upon; furthermore, his big, conspicuous, slovenly nests will be more subject to attack than the nests of other species. It has been shown that millions of sparrows are yearly destroyed by cats in London; yet so quickly are they snapped up by their subtle enemy that we really see nothing or very little indeed of the process. The young birds flutter out of their nests and drop lightly down, only to vanish like snowflakes that fall on the water. Here we see that even in London, with but two species to act upon, Nature, left a little to herself, has succeeded in establishing something like that balance of forces and harmony which exists everywhere in her own dominion. Would it not be better to leave it to Nature in the parks, too, to do her own killing in her own swift and secret manner? In streets and houses cats are of the greatest service, doing for us, and unseen by us, that which we could not effectually do for ourselves: in the parks their presence is injurious; there we rather want Nature’s feathered executioners, who are among her most beautiful and interesting creatures.
How effective and salutary her methods are, how beautiful in their results, may be seen in such places as have been made sanctuaries for all wild animals, innocent and rapacious. Even on the borders of London we have such places, and perhaps it would be hard anywhere in the rural districts to find a more perfect sanctuary in a small space than that of Caen Wood, at Hampstead. Although at the side of the swarming Heath, it is really wild, since for long years it has been free from the landscape gardener with his pretty little conventions, and the gamekeeper and henwife with their persecutions and playing at Providence among the creatures. If it were possible for a man to climb to the top of one of its noble old trees—a tall cedar, beech, or elm, with a girth of sixteen to eighteen feet—he would look down and out upon London: leagues upon leagues of houses, stretching away to the southern horizon, with tall chimneys, towers, and spires innumerable appearing above the brooding cloud of smoke. But the wood itself seems not to have been touched by its sulphurous breath; within its green shade all is fresh as in any leafy retreat a hundred miles from town. And here the wild creatures find a refuge. Badgers—not one pair nor two, but a big colony—have their huge subterraneous peaceful village in the centre of the wood. The lodge-keeper’s wife told me that one evening, seeing her dog, as she imagined, trotting from her across the lawn, she called to him and, angered at his disregard of her voice, ran after him for some distance among the trees, and only when she was about to lay her hands on him discovered that she was chasing a big badger. The badgers have for neighbours stoats and weasels, carrion crows, jays, and owls. Even in the daytime you will find the wood-owl dozing in the deep twilight of a holly-bush growing in the shade of a huge oak or elm. High up on the trees at least half a dozen pairs of carrion crows have their nests; and occasionally all the birds gather at one spot and fill the entire wood with their tremendous excited cries. A dozen of these birds, when they let themselves go, will create a greater uproar than a hundred cawing rooks.
Here, too, the rabbit keeps his place in spite of so many enemies; and to those named must be added the domestic cat. I myself have seen puss returning to the house carrying a half-grown young rabbit to her kittens.
The moorhen and wood-pigeon also flourish, and in a still greater degree the missel-thrush, throstle, and blackbird. In this wood I have counted forty-three breeding species; and not only is the variety great, but many of our best songsters, residents and migrants, are so numerous that at certain times in spring, when birds are most vocal, you may hear at this spot as fine a concert of sweet voices as in any wood in England.
Sanctuaries like that of Caen Wood the Metropolitan parks can never be. Only in a few of the most favourably situated open spaces on the borders of London could we have anything approaching to the richness and harmony seen in this perfect transcript of wild nature. But it should be our aim to have all the parks, even to the most central, as nearly like sanctuaries as such small isolated urban spaces, inhabited by so limited a number of species, may be made.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Jennings (James): Ornithologia; or, the Birds; a poem in two parts, with an introduction to their Natural History and copious notes. Second edition, 8vo. London, 1829.
Torre (H. J.): ‘A List of Birds found in Middlesex.’ The Naturalist (Neville Wood’s), vol. iii. p. 420. 8vo. London, 1838.
Hibberd (Shirley): ‘London Birds.’ Intellectual Observer, vol. vii. pp. 167-175. 8vo. London, 1865.
Power (F. D.): ‘A List of Birds noticed in London during 1863-4.’ Zoologist, vol. xxiii. p. 9,727. London, 1865.
Harting (J. E.): The Birds of Middlesex. 8vo. London, 1866.
Adams (A. Leith): ‘Birds of London.’ Field, January 16 and 23. London, 1875.
Hamilton (Edward): ‘The Rooks and Rookeries of London, Past and Present.’ Zoologist, 3rd series, vol. ii. pp. 193-199. London, 1878.
Newton (Alfred): ‘Rooks and Rookeries of London.’ Zoologist, vol. ii. pp. 441-444. London, 1878.
Hamilton (Edward): ‘The Birds of London, Past and Present, Residents and Casuals.’ Zoologist, vol. iii. pp. 273-291. London, 1879.
Pigott (J. Digby): London Birds and London Insects. 8vo. London, 1884.
Harting (J. E.): ‘Bird Life in Kensington Gardens.’ Field, January 14, 1888.
Harting (J. E.): ‘The Birds of Hampstead Hill,’ in J. L. Lobley’s Hampstead Hill. 4to. London, 1889.
Hamilton (Edward): ‘The Wild Birds of London.’ Murray’s Magazine. London, May 1889.
Miller (Christy): Birds of Essex. 8vo. London, 1890.
Tristram-Valentine (J. T.): London Birds and Beasts. With a Preface by F. E. Beddard. 8vo. London, 1895.
‘The Birds of London.’ Edinburgh Review. London, January 1898.
INDEX
- Abney Park Cemetery, 190
- ‘Afternoon tea,’ sparrows at, 9
- Albino daws, 64, 66
- Anemones, decorative use of, by moorhens, 96
- Arnold, Matthew, ‘Lines written in Kensington Gardens,’ 161
- Badger-hunt, a modern, 259
- Badgers at Wimbledon, 258
- — a colony of, in Caen Wood, 327
- Barn Elms Park, 253
- Barnes Common, 253, 254
- Battersea Park, moorhen’s æsthetic nest in, 96
- — — starlings congregating in, 139
- — — making of, 240
- — — bird life assisted in, 242
- — — a spirited cat in, 291
- Beverley Brook, 253, 255
- Birds’-nesting, 175, 183, 230
- Birds of London, changes among the, 5
- — — — recent additions to, 89, 94
- — — — passerine, 104
- — — — their disregard of noise, 188
- — — — encouragement of, 242, 275
- Bishop’s Park, Fulham, 251
- — — bird life in, past and present, 252
- Blackbirds in London, white, 64, 123
- — proportional numbers of, 122
- Booth, Mr. Charles, as to ‘roughs,’ 279
- Bostell Woods and Heath, 226
- — — bird life in, 227, 230
- Bread-eating by the crow, 45
- — by the gull, 148
- Breeding places, need of, in central parks, 163, 179
- Brockwell Park, 235
- Buckhurst Hill, white owl at, 166
- Caen Wood, Nature’s balance in, 326
- Camberwell Cemetery, 233
- Carrion crow, as domestic pet, 48
- — — as mouser, 49
- — — as practical joker, 50
- Carrion crows in London, 32
- — — mock battle of, 33
- — — daily flight of, 42
- — — modification of feeding habits, 44
- — — picking food from the river, 46
- — — visits of, to the Zoological Gardens, 175
- Cat, a, on a Battersea island, 291
- Cathedrals, æsthetic value of daws to, 53, 264
- Cats, need of their exclusion from bird preserves, 163, 221, 276, 284
- — connection between sparrows and, 285
- — deliberate ‘straying’ of, 299
- — suggestion as to disposal of, 300
- — present attempts at exclusion of, from parks, 301
- — destruction of low-nesting birds by, 290
- — their numbers in London, 294
- — ownerless, 295
- Cemeteries:
- Kensal Green, 172
- Abney Park, 190
- established on Barnes Common, 254
- their future use, 171, 186, 234
- Chaffinch, the, as songster, 12
- — its winter resorts, 144
- — its return to London, 158
- — from the bird-fancier’s point of view, 197-200
- — care of nest of, at Clissold Park, 280
- Changes in bird population, 5, 267, 273
- Changes in habits of birds, 93
- ‘Chapel,’ a sparrows’, 114, 288
- Checks, natural, to sparrow increase, 325
- — needed, on pigeon increase, 313
- Churchyard Bottom Wood, 184
- City, wood-pigeons nesting in the, 91
- Clapham Common, 243
- Clissold Park, crows formerly in, 45
- — — hasty visit of daws to, 57
- — — wood-pigeons in, 91
- — — description of, 189
- — — regard for bird life in, 190, 280
- — — bird experiments in, 309
- Corncrake, its occasional presence at Hampstead, 178
- County Council, their aim in bird protection, 17
- — — their management of Hampstead Heath, 182
- — — their improvements in Hackney Marsh, 202-208
- — — at Peckham Rye Park, 231
- — — their swans, 247
- — — suggested care of birds by, 282
- — — suggested action of, as to stray cats, 302
- Courser, cream-coloured, shot at Hackney, 209
- Crows, species of, in London, 20, 29
- Dabchick, see Grebe
- Darkness of London winter, birds affected by, 106
- Decoys, action of tame birds as, 312, 314
- Dogs, number of, as compared to cats, 294
- — number destroyed under the muzzling order, 300
- Ducks of the Serpentine, 34
- — annual shooting of, 36
- — in Holland Park, domestic difficulties of, 40
- — terror of, on sight of crow, 41
- Dulwich Park, bird life in, 234
- East-enders, their regard for the chaffinch, 197
- East London, paucity of breathing spaces in, 192
- Eggs, ducks’, stolen from Kensington Gardens, 40
- — proposed substitution of, 306, 317, 318, 323
- Egg-stealing by jackdaw, 61
- Enfield, the ‘Raven Tree’ at, 25
- Exotic shrubs, 17, 164, 185, 215
- Fence against cats, need of, 301
- Fieldfares in London, 131, 178
- Finsbury Park, 187
- Flycatcher, spotted, at Ravenscourt Park, 170
- — — in Kew Gardens, 267
- Fowls, attack of, on marauding jackdaw, 61
- Fuel-gatherers, 86
- Fulham, former presence of spoonbills and herons at, 2, 252
- — Bishop’s Park at, 251
- Geese, wild, flying over London, 132
- Gray’s Inn Gardens, rookery in, 70
- — — — destruction of kite’s nest in, 121
- — — — suggestion as to rooks in, 305
- Grebe, the little, as a London bird, 97
- — — — his nest, 99
- — — — defends his nest against swans, 100
- — — — in St. James’s Park, 102
- — — — seasonal movements of, 137
- — — — at Kew, 267
- — — — as possible foster parents to crested grebe, 317
- Greenwich Park, former rookery in, 77
- — — indiscriminate tree-lopping in, 224
- — — bird life in, 225
- Gulls, black-headed, in London, 145
- — — feeding on sprats, 148
- Hackney Downs, 194
- — Marsh, 201
- — — cream-coloured courser shot at, 209
- Hampstead, last of the magpies at, 22
- — nesting place of crow at, 43
- — Heath, 176
- — — birds of, 178
- Haws, wood-pigeons feeding on, 135
- Hedge-sparrows, rarity of, in Kensington Gardens, 159
- Herons, former nesting of, at Fulham, 2, 252
- — increase of, at Richmond, 263
- Heronry at Wanstead, 212
- Hibbert, the late Mr. Shirley, on robins in London, 124
- — — — — — on London birds, 152
- Highbury Fields, 191
- Highgate Cemetery, manifest destiny of, 186
- — Woods, characteristics of, 183
- Holland Park, difficulties of ducks in, 39
- — — as bird sanctuary, 157
- Hyde Park, bird-feeders in, 15
- — — destruction of ravens in, 25
- — — decrease of birds in, 275
- Jackdaw, a tame, 58
- — his egg-stealing avenged, 61
- — his parting visit, 63
- — at Clissold Park, 310
- — wild daws attracted by, 311
- Jackdaws, their rarity in London, 52
- — as cathedral birds, 53, 264
- — colony of, at Kensington, 55
- — their relations with rooks, 56, 138
- — short visit of, to Clissold Park, 57
- — white, 63
- — abundance of, at Richmond, 262
- Jay, its absence from the inner parks, 23
- — at Streatham, 250
- — at Wimbledon, 257
- — at Richmond, 263
- — at Kew, 267
- ‘Jenny,’ the Tower raven, 29
- Kempshall, Mr., loaf-stealing crow observed by, 45
- Kennington Park, 219
- — — bird life in, 221
- Kensington Gardens, raven in, 27
- — — daws in, 55, 274
- — — former rookery in, 77-82
- — — a stranger’s first view of, 78
- — — destruction of trees in, 79-85
- — — Matthew Arnold on, 161
- — — owls in, 165, 274
- Kestrels at Hackney Marsh, 206
- Kew Gardens, 265
- — — bird life in, 267
- Kilburn, open spaces in, 172
- Kimber, Sergeant, his experiments in Clissold Park, 309
- Kingfisher in Battersea Park, 293
- — suggestion for encouragement of, 322
- Kite, its former office as scavenger, 2
- — destruction of last nest of, 121
- Lambeth Palace, skylarks in grounds of, 144
- — — white owl at, 166
- Lea River, swans on the, 205
- — — former fishing in the, 206
- Leg of Mutton Pond, moorhens on the, 180
- Lethal chamber suggested for cats, 300
- ‘London,’ ambiguity of the term, 2
- London, toleration of, by birds, 275
- — absorption of country by, 286
- London districts:
- East, 192
- North and North-west, 172
- South, 216
- South-east, 218
- South-west, 237
- West, 156
- London fields, 194
- Longevity of birds, 110, 324
- Macaulay, T. B., recollections of Clapham Common, 244
- Magpie, rarity of, in London, 20
- — fate of last pair at Hampstead, 22
- Mallard, imperfect domestication of, 38
- — nesting in trees, 39
- Mansfield, Lord, birds in his grounds, 178, 181
- Marsh lands by the Thames, 210
- Melford, Mr. Mark, daws rescued by, 59
- — Mrs., her tame jackdaw, 59-63
- Middlesex, remains of primæval forest of, 184
- Migration, as seen in London, 129-133
- Minet, Mr. William, Myatt’s Fields given by, 219
- Missel-thrush at Kew, 267
- — possible reintroduction of, 318
- Moat, the, at Bishop’s Park, Fulham, 251
- Moat-hen, early name for moorhen, 94
- Moorhens, the, in London, 94
- — decorative tastes of, 96
- — their dislike of dabchicks, 100
- — their autumnal movements, 138
- — on Hampstead Heath, 180
- — half-grown, as parent’s assistants, 181
- Moule, Mr. E. C. H., on the birds of Hampstead, 179
- Mouser, the crow as, 49
- Movements of London birds, diurnal, 38, 42, 145
- — — — — seasonal, 129 et supra
- Myatt’s Fields, 219
- Nests in parks, &c., taking of, 276
- Newton, Professor, as to the Temple Gardens rookery, 307
- Night in Kensington Gardens, 38
- Nightingale in Bostell Woods, 230
- — at Streatham, 250
- — increasing rarity of, 268
- Northey, Sir R., rooks brought to Temple Gardens by, 307
- Nunhead Cemetery, 233
- Nuthatch, possible introduction of the, 318
- Offerings to mistress by tame rook, 74
- Open spaces of London, 151, 171, 192, &c.
- — — comparative area of, in the several districts, 239
- Owl, white, at Lambeth, 166
- Owls, brown and white, in London, 4
- — — — — in Kensington Gardens, 165, 274
- — — — — at Hampstead, 178
- — — — — at Bostell Woods, 230
- Oxeye, disappearance of, from London, 158
- — possible reintroduction of, 319
- Parks, central, of London, 156
- Partridge, the, at Kew, 267
- Peacock feathers, use of, by moorhens, 96
- Peckham Rye and Park, 230
- — — bird life in, 232, 233
- Pewit, the, at Wimbledon, 257
- Pheasant, the, at Kew, 267
- Phillips, Mr. M. B., his tame crow, 49
- Pigeon, domestic, increase of, in London, 53
- — — need of check on, 313
- — homing, shot on Hampstead Marsh, 208
- Pike, destruction of water-fowl by, 213
- Pinioning, 315
- Plumstead, 225
- Ponds, provision for bird life on, 180, 196
- — small, swans on, 247
- Putney Heath, 255
- Rabbits in Hyde Park, destruction of, by cats, 293
- Ranelagh Sporting Club, 252
- Raptorial birds, their possible reintroduction, 312, 325
- Raven, bracelet stolen by, 26
- Ravens, their former presence in London, 25
- — fate of the last pair, 25
- — duel in Regent’s Park, 27
- — savagery towards their young, 127
- Ravenscourt Park, 168
- Regent’s Park, 173
- Richmond Park, 261
- Ring, theft and restoration of, by rook, 75
- Ringdove, see Wood-pigeon
- Robins, growing scarceness of, 124, 159
- — their intolerant spirit, 126, 127
- — annual scattering of, 140
- Roding, the river, 211
- Rook, tame, curious customs of, 73-77
- Rookery in Gray’s Inn Gardens, 70
- — in Kensington Gardens, fate of, 77-84
- Rookeries, 178, 212, 235, 250, 258
- Rooks, daws joining a company of, 56, 138
- — approaching disappearance of, 70
- — their characteristics, 72
- — their winter roosting places, 138
- — at Richmond, 257
- — proposed reintroduction of, to London, 305, 309
- Rook shooting, herons scared by, 214
- — — not approved of by rooks, 258
- ‘Rough,’ the, his hunting instincts, 278
- St. James’s Park, little grebes nesting at, 98
- — — — as a winter bird resort, 147
- Sanctuary for birds at Caen Wood, 326
- Sanctuaries for birds, need of, 163, 179, 213
- Scavengers, birds as, 2, 8, 24, 44, 46
- Serpentine, suicide of raven in, 27
- — need of an island refuge in, 164
- ‘Shindies,’ sparrows’, 113
- Shooting of ducks in Hyde Park, 37
- Shrubs for parks, native preferable to exotic, 17, 164, 185, 215
- Singing matches of chaffinches, 198
- Skylark, 144, 205, 209, 257
- Soaring birds, appreciation of height helped by, 53, 264
- Soho Square, wood-pigeons nesting in, 91
- Southwark Park, 219
- — — bird life in, 220
- Sparrow, a tame, 108
- — a love-sick, 112
- Sparrows, companionship of, 7
- — their predominance, 105
- — intelligence, 107
- — domestic irregularities, 111
- — ‘shindies,’ 113
- — vesper song, 115
- — pugnacity of those at the Tower, 141
- — cats as check on increase of, 285, 325
- — naturally tree birds, 287
- — utilisation of, as foster-parents, 323
- — present attempts to check their number, 324
- Species of birds lost to London, 197, 271
- — — — decrease of, 272
- — — — proposed restoration of, 304
- Spoonbills, their former presence at Fulham, 2, 252
- ‘Sport,’ fascination of, 199
- Stables, Dr. Gordon, on domestic relations of sparrows, 111
- Stanley, Bishop, on moorhens, 95
- Starlings as London birds, 116
- — labour of, in feeding their young, 117, 120
- — variety of their notes, 119
- — autumnal gatherings of, 139
- Stock-dove in London, 103
- — possibility of its reintroduction, 31
- ‘Straying’ of cats, 299
- Streatham Common, 248
- — — bird life on, 250
- Suburbs, abundance of birds in the, 155
- Suggestion as to white daws, 66
- — as to water-fowl at Hampstead, 181
- — — — — at Victoria Park, 196
- — as to pond at Kennington, 221
- — as to moat at Fulham, 252
- — as to care of bird life by County Council, 282
- — as to Gray’s Inn rooks, 305
- — as to disposal of stray cats, 300
- — as to reintroduction of birds to London, 304
- — as to encouragement of kingfishers, 322
- Summer visitants, their usual route, 157
- — — at Hampstead, 178
- — — at Battersea Park, 243
- — songsters in the suburbs, 321
- Suspiciousness of sparrows, 107
- Swallows as London visitors, 130
- Swans and dabchicks, battle between, 100
- — their unsuitableness on small ponds, 186, 247
- — of the river Lea, 205
- Tame birds as decoys, 312, 314
- Temple Gardens, origin of rookery in, 307
- Thames, the, as hunting ground for crows, 46
- Thrushes, growing scarceness of, 160
- Tits, growing rarity of, 159
- Tooting Bec, 246
- — Graveney, 248
- Tower of London, ravens at the, 27
- — — — fieldfares on tree at, 132
- — — — fate of robin at, 141
- Trap-shooting, sale of jackdaws for, 59
- Trees, ducks nesting in, 39
- — destruction of, in Kensington Gardens, 79-84
- — old, due care of, 161
- — their growth stunted by smoke, 196
- — lopping of, at Greenwich, 224
- — rooks driven away by mutilation of, 71, 77, 81
- Tristram-Valentine, the late Mr., on the starling in London, 126
- — on gulls in London, 145
- Tuck, Mr. W. H., on the Kensington crows, 42
- Turtle-dove, possible introduction of, 314
- Vesper songs of birds, 115
- Victoria Park, 194, 195
- — — singing lessons to chaffinches in, 198
- Visitants, occasional, 29, 97, 138, 143-145
- Wandsworth Common, 245, 246
- Wanstead Park, 210
- — — bird life in, 212
- Warblers in London, 143
- — at Hampstead, 178
- — in Bostell Woods, 228
- Waterfowl, ornamental, relative value of, 34, 68
- — rare, visits of, to the parks, 97, 145, 314, 316
- Waterlow Park, bird population of, 185
- — — swans at, 186
- Westbourne Park, wood-pigeons at coal deposit at, 91
- West London, open spaces on borders of, 171
- Wheatears on Hampstead Heath, 130, 178
- White jackdaws, 64
- — ravens, 65
- — blackbirds, 123
- White House Fishery, 206, 209
- — — resort of Hackney ‘sportsmen,’ 207
- Whiteness, black species most subject to vary into, 64
- Willughby on white ravens, 65
- Wimbledon Common, bird life on, 257
- — — badgers at, 258
- Woodpecker, green, at Hampstead, 263
- — — at Kew, 267
- — lesser spotted, 178, 225, 267
- — spotted, disappearance of, 178
- Wood-pigeons, their increase in London, 6, 89
- — recent arrival of, 90, 101
- — changes in their habits, 93
- — their autumnal exodus, 134
- — a singular habit of, 135
- Wren, gradual disappearance of, 159
- — increase of, in Battersea Park, 243
- — strength of vocal powers, 320
- — goldcrest, at Kew, 267
- Wryneck at Kew, 267, 274
- Yarrell on magpies in Kensington Gardens, 22
- Yellowhammer at Hampstead Heath, 177
- — at Wandsworth Common, 246
- — at Barnes Common, 254
- Zoological Gardens, visits from crows to the, 176