Austria, 1881–1899.142
| Status. | Years. | ||||||
| 1881–1885. | 1886–1890. | 1891–1895. | 1896. | 1897. | 1898. | 1899. | |
| Unmarried | 56.8 | 59.9 | 60.7 | 62.2 | 62.9 | 61.7 | 61.3 |
| Married | 39.9 | 36.9 | 36.2 | 34.7 | 34.1 | 35.3 | 35.3 |
| Widowers and widows | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.3 |
Here the unmarried are more numerous than the married. It is different, however, in a neighboring country:
Hungary, 1888.143
| Status. | To 100 Convicts. | |||
| Men. | Women. | |||
| Assizes. | Corr. Tribun. | Assizes. | Corr. Tribun. | |
| Unmarried | 42.89 | 32.99 | 33.51 | 18.03 |
| Married | 54.66 | 62.31 | 53.08 | 69.29 |
| Widowers and widows | 2.36 | 4.06 | 13.08 | 11.46 |
| Divorced | 0.09 | 0.64 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
Here, then, the married persons far outnumber the unmarried. However, neither of these tables has much value, for first, nothing shows that from the total number of the unmarried those who have not yet reached marriageable age has been subtracted, and second, the corresponding figures for the non-criminal population are lacking, so that a comparison of the two is impossible. [450]
In these respects the following figures are better:
Italy, 1891–1895.144
| Status. | Annual Average Number (of Criminals) to 100,000 of the Population in Each Group over 14. |
| Unmarried | 978.47 |
| Married | 622.27 |
| Widowers and widows | 291.84 |
But as the Hungarian figures have already shown it is necessary to make a division for sexes, for first, women have a much lower figure for criminality than men, and second, the whole population is not equally divided between men and women.
The defects so far noted have been avoided in the following tables:
France, 1881–1900.145
| Status. | To 100,000 of the Same State of Life there were accused at the Assizes: | |||
| Men. | Women. | |||
| 1881–1885. | 1896–1900. | 1881–1885. | 1896–1900. | |
| Unmarried | 62 | 41 | 8 | 5 |
| Married | 18 | 12 | 3 | 2 |
| Widowers and widows | 24 | 14 | 5 | 3 |
Netherlands, 1899.146
| Status. | Men. | Women. | ||
| To 100 Men of Marriageable Age there were: | To 100 Male Convicts of Marriageable Age there were: | To 100 Women of Marriageable Age there were: | To 100 Female Convicts of Marriageable Age there were: | |
| Unmarried | 34.8 | 59.1 | 36.2 | 36.7 |
| Married | 58.8 | 36.7 | 52.4 | 52.6 |
| Widowers, widows, divorced | 6.4 | 4.2 | 11.4 | 10.7 |
[451]
Switzerland, 1892–1896.147
| Status. | Men. | Women. | ||
| To 100 of Population Over 12 Yrs. Old there were: | To 100 Prisoners there were: | To 100 of Population Over 12 Yrs. Old there were: | To 100 Prisoners there were: | |
| Unmarried | 49.3 | 64.0 | 45.7 | 48.5 |
| Married | 44.8 | 26.6 | 41.9 | 33.0 |
| Widowers and widows | 5.5 | 5.7 | 11.7 | 11.6 |
| Divorced | 0.4 | 3.7 | 0.7 | 6.9 |
These tables show that the unmarried men (but not the women) are in general more criminal than the married. However it is necessary to be careful as to this point. All these tables fail to connect civil status with age, a fact which reduces their importance almost to nothing, first because the tendency to crime differs much with age; and secondly, because the percentage of married persons is not the same for different ages. It is, therefore, necessary to compare the married and the unmarried at the same age. The German statistics are the only ones which furnish the necessary materials, and the conclusions to be drawn from these are the only ones which give us certain information as to the relation between crime and marriage. These statistics have served as the basis for the two studies of Dr. Prinzing’s already quoted from which we take the following tables.
First the relation between marriage and crime among men. But it must first be remarked that married men are acquitted oftener than bachelors, as a consequence of which the unmarried men are made, in the tables, to seem more criminal than they are—as the following table shows: [452]
Germany, 1886–1890.148
| Age. | Number Acquitted out of 100 Accused of Each Category of Age and Civil Status. | ||
| Unmarried. | Married. | Widowers and Divorced. | |
| 18–21 | 15.0 | 20.7 | |
| 21–25 | 15.8 | 18.4 | |
| 25–30 | 15.9 | 20.1 | 16.1 |
| 30–40 | 15.1 | 22.3 | 16.0 |
| 40–50 | 13.4 | 23.7 | 15.2 |
| 50–60 | 13.4 | 24.9 | 18.0 |
| Over 60 | 14.2 | 28.1 | 22.3 |
Germany, 1888.149
Crimes in General.
| Age. | Number of Convicts to 100,000 Persons of Each Category. | |||
| Unmarried. | Married. | Wid. and Div. | Total. | |
| 18–21 | 2,994.5 | 5,413.0 | 3,009.2 | |
| 21–25 | 3,107.0 | 3,566.3 | 3,163.8 | |
| 25–30 | 2,950.9 | 2,504.7 | 4,273.7 | 2,746.7 |
| 30–40 | 2,880.9 | 1,961.2 | 3,797.2 | 2,171.5 |
| 40–50 | 2,205.7 | 1,487.8 | 2,626.3 | 1,599.8 |
| 50–60 | 1,241.9 | 1,009.8 | 1,267.8 | 1,052.5 |
| Over 60 | 494.6 | 490.1 | 342.7 | 450.5 |
It appears then from this table, first, that in general the bachelors commit more crimes than the married men; second, that the contrary is true of the period between 18 and 25; third, that the criminality of married men is very great.
The following figures have to do with some important economic crimes.150 [453]
Simple Theft.
| Age. | Unmarried. | Married. | Widowers, Widows and Divorced. | Total. |
| 18–21 | 551.7 | 1,418.3 | 555.3 | |
| 21–25 | 427.7 | 685.9 | 627.2 | 457.7 |
| 25–30 | 382.6 | 412.6 | 572.1 | 398.5 |
| 30–40 | 411.9 | 296.9 | 550.0 | 323.0 |
| 40–50 | 365.0 | 216.2 | 420.0 | 237.4 |
| 50–60 | 233.1 | 151.6 | 231.1 | 164.6 |
| Over 60 | 109.2 | 84.0 | 67.2 | 81.2 |
It is, then, in the period between 18 and 30 that married persons are more often guilty of theft than the unmarried; after 30 the parts are changed, except that under the last two age-classes the widows, widowers, and divorced persons show high figures.
Embezzlements.151
| Age. | Unmarried. | Married. | Widowers, Widows and Divorced. | Total. |
| 18–21 | 123.2 | 338.7 | 124.4 | |
| 21–25 | 131.6 | 163.6 | 295.6 | 135.5 |
| 25–30 | 139.7 | 109.8 | 291.6 | 126.1 |
| 30–40 | 161.8 | 86.1 | 279.6 | 103.4 |
| 40–50 | 128.0 | 61.1 | 168.8 | 71.3 |
| 50–60 | 66.2 | 37.7 | 71.3 | 42.7 |
| Over 60 | 28.3 | 16.6 | 13.9 | 16.7 |
In this crime also there is a greater criminality among married persons between 18 and 25 than among the unmarried, and the opposite for the later periods. The situation is entirely different in the case of the crime which follows:152
Fraudulent Bankruptcy.
| Age. | Unmarried. | Married. | Widowers, Widows and Divorced. | Total. |
| 18–21 | 0.3 | 33.9 | 0.3 | |
| 21–25 | 3.3 | 21.3 | 4.5 | |
| 25–30 | 3.9 | 14.8 | 9.8 | |
| 30–40 | 4.3 | 9.9 | 15.9 | 9.0 |
| 40–50 | 2.2 | 6.6 | 7.2 | 6.2 |
| 50–60 | 1.1 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.7 |
| Over 60 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
[454]
Here we have a higher degree of criminality among the married persons of all ages.
It is unnecessary to give the figures for all the economic crimes and it will be enough simply to give the general results for the rest. Unmarried persons are guilty of the following crimes more often than married persons: aggravated theft (at all ages); robbery and extortion (except between the ages of 21 and 25); fraud and criminal breach of trust (except between the ages of 21 and 25); forgery (except between 21 and 25, and over 60); and counterfeiting. The following offenses are more often committed by married persons than by unmarried: being accessory to theft, and receiving stolen goods (except between 30 and 40); violation of secrets; usury; and procuration. It must be added that widows, widowers and divorced persons show very high figures for economic offenses.
As to sexual crimes we have the following figures:153
| Age. | Incest. | Debauching through Abuse of Confidence. | ||||||
| Unmarried. | Married. | Widows and Divorced. | Total. | Unmarried. | Married. | Widows and Divorced. | Total. | |
| 18–21 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||||
| 21–25 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.20 | 0.4 | 0.20 | ||
| 25–30 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.30 | 0.3 | 0.30 | ||
| 30–40 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 22.7 | 1.7 | 0.20 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 0.40 |
| 40–50 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 26.3 | 2.5 | 0.40 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.50 |
| 50–60 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 12.4 | 2.1 | 0.20 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.30 |
| Over 60 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.10 | |
Consequently, as regards these crimes, the married persons are more often guilty than the unmarried, but the widowers, widows and divorced persons occupy the first rank.
| Age. | Rape, Etc.154 | |||
| Unmarried. | Married. | Widowers and Divorced. | Total. | |
| 21–25 | 26.3 | 24.1 | 26.1 | |
| 25–30 | 26.2 | 15.7 | 21.2 | |
| 30–40 | 39.7 | 12.8 | 61.4 | 18.6 |
| 40–50 | 44.5 | 9.9 | 56.2 | 14.8 |
| 50–60 | 36.8 | 8.4 | 28.3 | 12.3 |
| 60–70 | 28.3 | 6.8 | 18.7 | 11.1 |
| Over 70 | 18.7 | 5.6 | 10.3 | 8.6 |
[455]
Here the unmarried persons are guilty oftener than those married, and widowers and divorced persons oftenest of all. As for debauch contrary to nature it is the unmarried persons who are the most often guilty.
Here, finally, are figures for the more important remaining crimes:
| Age. | Rebellion.155 | |||
| Unmarried. | Married. | Widowers, Widows and Divorced. | Total. | |
| 18–21 | 130.5 | 211.7 | — | 130.8 |
| 21–25 | 199.0 | 143.6 | — | 192.0 |
| 25–30 | 228.2 | 113.8 | 258.0 | 174.2 |
| 30–40 | 262.6 | 83.1 | 236.2 | 119.4 |
| 40–50 | 206.6 | 55.6 | 160.4 | 73.6 |
| 50–60 | 92.0 | 34.2 | 59.6 | 40.8 |
| Over 60 | 25.2 | 14.5 | 11.2 | 14.3 |
| Age. | Insults.156 | |||
| Unmarried. | Married. | Widowers and Divorced. | Total. | |
| 18–21 | 111.1 | 444.5 | — | 112.5 |
| 21–25 | 173.3 | 279.0 | 448.0 | 186.7 |
| 25–30 | 222.9 | 270.6 | 381.4 | 249.3 |
| 30–40 | 277.4 | 316.2 | 377.3 | 312.8 |
| 40–50 | 240.7 | 311.3 | 317.3 | 307.3 |
| 50–60 | 158.1 | 237.7 | 187.5 | 229.4 |
| Over 60 | 66.4 | 122.9 | 66.6 | 103.7 |
Here the married persons have the highest figures at all ages.
| Age. | Assaults.157 | |||
| Unmarried. | Married. | Widowers and Divorced. | Total. | |
| 18–21 | 1,084.2 | 1,778.2 | — | 1,087.3 |
| 21–25 | 1,132.5 | 1,051.5 | 1,344.0 | 1,124.1 |
| 25–30 | 904.6 | 692.9 | 964.7 | 803.3 |
| 30–40 | 552.6 | 434.1 | 602.3 | 459.7 |
| 40–50 | 262.9 | 268.1 | 316.1 | 269.6 |
| 50–60 | 117.7 | 161.9 | 144.6 | 157.2 |
| Over 60 | 43.5 | 68.6 | 40.9 | 59.0 |
[456]
The unmarried show in general higher figures than the married persons (except for the period between 18 and 21).
| Age. | Murder and Homicide.158 | |||
| Unmarried. | Married. | Widowers and Divorced. | Total. | |
| 18–21 | 2.2 | 2.2 | ||
| 21–25 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 3.0 | |
| 25–30 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 2.6 | |
| 30–40 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 13.6 | 1.9 |
| 40–50 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 6.0 | 1.9 |
| 50–60 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 0.7 |
| Over 60 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
Here it is the widowers, widows and divorced persons who are most involved, and then the unmarried.
For some other crimes we shall give only the results. Married persons are more often guilty of the following crimes than the unmarried; domiciliary trespass (except between 25 and 50); perjury (except between 21 and 25, and between 30 and 40) and other offenses against the obligation of taking oath; false accusation; unintentional homicide (except between 25 and 30); offenses against personal liberty (except between 30 and 50); and crimes and misdemeanors committed by public officials.
For the following crimes, on the other hand, the unmarried hold the first rank: offenses against public worship (except between 21 and 25); malicious mischief (except between 18 and 21); and arson. It is to be noted that for nearly all the above the widowers, widows and divorced persons show very high figures.
After an examination of the results found it is impossible to say that the married persons show absolutely a criminality less in degree than that of the unmarried; there is a variation for offenses as well as for ages. Only considered in general, the tendency to crime is less in the case of the married than of the unmarried.
As the following figures prove the connection between crime and marriage is quite different in the case of women. It is necessary, however, to show the following table before giving figures in support of this assertion. [457]
Germany, 1886–1890.159
| Age. | Number of Acquittals to 100 Accused Persons of Each Age Group. | ||
| Unmarried. | Married. | Widowed and Divorced. | |
| 18–21 | 15.1 | 25.6 | |
| 21–25 | 16.8 | 24.5 | 24.1 |
| 25–30 | 16.7 | 24.2 | 19.7 |
| 30–40 | 17.3 | 23.4 | 19.6 |
| 40–50 | 18.2 | 24.2 | 21.7 |
| 50–60 | 18.2 | 25.8 | 24.4 |
| Over 60 | 19.8 | 27.0 | 27.7 |
As in the case of men there are, then, a greater percentage of acquittals among the married than among the unmarried.
Germany, 1882–1893.160
Crimes in General.
| Age. | To 100,000 Persons of Each Age Group there were Sentenced: | ||
| Unmarried. | Married. | Widowed and Divorced. | |
| 18–21 | 415.2 | 602.5 | |
| 21–25 | 417.5 | 469.9 | 1339.3 |
| 25–30 | 440.7 | 454.5 | 1149.2 |
| 30–40 | 446.2 | 500.0 | 1029.9 |
| 40–50 | 334.7 | 468.2 | 709.9 |
| 50–60 | 221.5 | 299.5 | 369.2 |
| Over 60 | 102.2 | 133.4 | 111.2 |
While married women of all ages lead the unmarried in general criminality, the highest figures are shown by the widows and divorcées.
The following tables have to do with the more important crimes, beginning with those affecting property:161 [458]
Simple Theft.
| Age. | Unmarried. | Married. | Widows and Divorcées. | Total. |
| 18–21 | 210.6 | 209.3 | 210.6 | |
| 21–25 | 177.1 | 147.8 | 385.7 | 169.3 |
| 25–30 | 158.5 | 132.0 | 318.5 | 144.0 |
| 30–40 | 136.6 | 127.1 | 265.9 | 135.1 |
| 40–50 | 92.2 | 104.0 | 175.9 | 111.6 |
| 50–60 | 61.2 | 64.4 | 88.6 | 70.3 |
| Over 60 | 32.0 | 31.1 | 28.0 | 29.5 |
The married women show, then, figures a little lower than those of the unmarried women, except between 40 and 60, and the widows and divorcées give the highest figures.
| Age. | Embezzlement. | Receiving Stolen Goods. | ||||||
| Unmar. | Mar. | Wid. and Div. | Total. | Unmar. | Mar. | Wid. and Div. | Total. | |
| 18–21 | 25.3 | 35.2 | 25.8 | 9.2 | 33.7 | 10.7 | ||
| 21–25 | 25.9 | 23.4 | 92.8 | 25.4 | 10.6 | 26.3 | 48.2 | 15.3 |
| 25–30 | 26.0 | 20.3 | 80.7 | 23.2 | 12.6 | 23.9 | 52.4 | 20.2 |
| 30–40 | 25.3 | 21.6 | 63.4 | 24.2 | 17.2 | 32.6 | 61.3 | 31.4 |
| 40–50 | 18.6 | 18.3 | 40.3 | 21.1 | 16.1 | 36.4 | 56.4 | 36.6 |
| 50–60 | 11.0 | 10.3 | 17.2 | 12.2 | 11.4 | 22.6 | 29.6 | 23.3 |
| Over 60 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 8.8 | 7.4 | 7.6 |
Under the head of “embezzlement” the unmarried women show figures a little higher than those of the married women (except between 18 and 21); in the crime of receiving stolen goods the married women are more guilty than the unmarried; while in both offenses it is the widows and divorcées who lead.