WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
Essays on the use and limit of the imagination in science cover

Essays on the use and limit of the imagination in science

Chapter 2: EXPLANATORY NOTE.
Open in WeRead

About This Book

The collection of essays and addresses examines how imagination functions within scientific inquiry, portraying it as an evidence-informed faculty that devises hypotheses, visualizes unseen mechanisms, and guides experiment while remaining subordinate to observation and logical test. It also warns against imaginative excess when speculation outpaces empirical support, delineating limits to metaphysical claims. Several pieces discuss the relation of life and consciousness to matter and force, seeking to dispel popular fears about reductionism and to free investigation into origins from theological impediments. Illustrative discussions draw on phenomena from optics, magnetism, and experimental method to show theory formation and verification.

EXPLANATORY NOTE.

To a Second Edition of a Discourse on the Scientific Use of the Imagination, delivered before the British Association at Liverpool on September 16, 1870, are here added an Address on the Limit of the Imagination in Science, delivered before the Mathematical and Physical Section of the Association at Norwich on August 19, 1868, and a short Essay, entitled ‘Earlier Thoughts.’

The Address and the Essay were meant to be brief, but definite statements of the relation of Life and Consciousness to Matter and Force.

As in the case of the recent Discourse, opinion was divided with regard to the objects and merits of the Norwich Address. On the one hand, two eminent clergymen, one of the Church of England, the other a Dissenter, proposed and seconded respectively a vote of thanks, which was liberally carried by the section; on the other hand, I was publicly warned that, as a consequence of my impiety, the bolts of heaven were in a state of potential suspension above my head, ready to descend if further drawn upon.

My main object, both at Norwich and at Liverpool, was, firstly, to dissipate the repugnance, and indeed terror, which in many minds are associated with the thought that science has abolished the mystery of man’s relation to the universe; and, secondly, to remove the hindrance which popular notions regarding the origin of life oppose to legitimate scientific speculation.

ATHENÆUM CLUB: November 1870.