WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
Facing the chair cover

Facing the chair

Chapter 20: IV THE PSYCHOLOGY OF FRAME-UPS
Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

About This Book

A collection of appeals, speeches, legal pleadings, and commentary assembled around the prosecution and conviction of two foreign-born workmen, arguing their innocence and condemning procedural irregularities. The text juxtaposes courtroom arguments, public statements by intellectuals and labor leaders, and activist responses to trace how political pressure, anti-immigrant sentiment, and class dynamics shaped public perception and legal outcomes. It uses the case to examine Americanization, civil liberties, and the relationship between the judiciary, the press, and organized labor, presenting both documentary material and interpretive critique.

IV
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF FRAME-UPS

But why were these men held as murderers and highwaymen and not as anarchists and advocates of the working people?

It was a frameup.

That does not necessarily mean that any set of government and employing class detectives deliberately planned to fasten the crime of murder on Sacco and Vanzetti. Though in this case it is almost certain that they did.

The frameup is an unconscious (occasionally semiconscious) mechanism. An unconscious mechanism is a kink in the mind that makes people do something without knowing why they do it, and often without knowing that they are doing it. It is the sub-rational act of a group, serving in this case, through a series of pointed unintentions, the ends of a governing class.

Among a people that does not recognize or rather does not admit the force and danger of ideas it is impossible to prosecute the holder of unpopular ideas directly. Also there is a smouldering tradition of freedom that makes those who do it feel guilty. After all everyone learnt the Declaration of Independence and Give me Liberty or Give me Death in school, and however perfunctory the words have become they have left a faint infantile impression on the minds of most of us. Hence the characteristic American weapon of the frameup. If a cop wants to arrest a man he suspects of selling dope he plants a gun on him and arrests him under the Sullivan Law. If a man is organizing a strike in a dangerously lively way you try to frame him under the Mann Act or else you get hold of a woman to sue him for breach of promise. If a representative votes against war you have him arrested for breach of decency in an automobile on a Virginia roadside. If two Italians are spreading anarchist propaganda, you hold them for murder.

The frameup is a process that you can’t help feeling, but like most unconscious processes it’s very hard to trace step by step. Half the agents in such a process don’t really know what they are doing. Hence the average moderately fairminded newspaper reader who never has had personal experience of a frameup in action is flabbergasted when you tell him that such and such a man who is being prosecuted for wifebeating is really being prosecuted because he knows the origin of certain bonds in a District Attorney’s safe.

In this neatly swept courtroom in Dedham with everything so varnished and genteel it is hardly possible to think of such a thing as a frameup, and yet.... Under these elms, in these white oldtime houses of Dedham, in front of these pious Georgian doorways.... The court has for the seventh time affirmed its will to send two innocent men to the electric chair.