Describing conditions in Paris on August 12, he says:
"We are in a state of tense expectation, so acute
that it dulls the senses; Paris is relapsing into the condition
of an audience assisting at a thrilling drama with intolerably
long entr'acts, during which it tries to think of its own
personal affairs.
"We know that pages of history are being rapidly engraved in
steel, written in blood, illuminated in the margin with glory on
a background of heroism and suffering, not more than a few score
miles away.
"The shrieking camelots (peddlers) gallop through the streets
waving their news sheets, but it is almost always news of
twenty-four hours ago. The iron hand of the censor reduces the
press to a monotonous repetition of the same formula. Only
headlines give scope for originality. Of local news there is
none. There is nothing doing in Paris but steady preparation for
meeting contingencies by organizing ambulances and relief for the
poor."
From the thousands of tales brought back by American tourists
caught in Germany at the outbreak of the war, there is more than
enough evidence that they were not treated with that courtesy
manifested towards them by the French. They were arrested as
spies, subjected to all sorts of embarrassments and indignities;
their persons searched, their baggage and letters examined, and
frequently were detained for long periods without any explanation
being offered. When finally taken to the frontier, they were not
merely put across—frequently they were in a sense thrown
across.
Nor were the subjects of other nations, particularly those with
which Germany was at war, treated with that fine restraint which
characterized the French. Here is an account by a traveller of
the treatment of Russian subjects:
"We left Berlin on the day Germany declared war against Russia.
Within seventy-five miles of the frontier, 1,000 Russians in the
train by which they were travelling were turned out of the
carriage and compelled to spend eighteen hours without food in an
open field surrounded by soldiers with fixed bayonets.
"Then they were placed in dirty cattle wagons, about sixty men,
women and children to a wagon, and for twenty-eight hours were
carried about Prussia without food, drink or privacy. In Stettin
they were lodged in pig pens, and next morning were sent off by
steamer to Rugen, whence they made their way to Denmark and
Sweden without money or luggage. Sweden provided them with food
and free passage to the Russian frontier. Five of our
fellow-passengers went mad."
The steamship Philadelphia—note the name, signifying
brotherly love, so completely lost sight of in the
conflict—was the first passenger liner to reach America
after the beginning of the European war. A more remarkable crowd
never arrived in New York City by steamship or train. There were
men of millions and persons of modest means who had slept side by
side on the journey over; voyagers with balances of tens of
thousands of dollars in banks and not a cent in their
pocketbooks; men able and eager to pay any price for the best
accommodations to be had, yet satisfied and happy sharing bunks
in the steerage.
There were women who had lost all baggage and had come alone,
their friends and relatives being unable to get accommodations on
the vessel. There were children who had come on board with their
mothers, with neither money nor reservations, who were happy
because they had received the very best treatment from all the
steamship's officers and crew and because they had enjoyed the
most comfortable quarters to be had, surrendered by men who were
content to sleep in most humble surroundings, or, if necessary,
as happened in a few cases, to sleep on the decks when the
weather permitted.
Wealthy, but without funds, many of the passengers gave jewelry
to the stewards and other employees of the steamship as the tips
which they assumed were expected even in times of stress. The
crew took them apologetically, some said they were content to
take only the thanks of the passengers. One woman of wealth and
social position, without money, and having lost her check book
with her baggage, as had many others of the passengers, gave a
pair of valuable bracelets to her steward with the request that
he give them to his wife. She gave a hat—the only one she
managed to take with her on her flight from Switzerland—to
her stewardess.
The statue of Liberty never looked so beautiful to a party of
Americans before. The strains of the Star Spangled Banner, as
they echoed over the waters of the bay, were never sweeter nor
more inspiring. As the Philadelphia approached quarrantine, the
notes of the American anthem swelled until, as she slowed down to
await the coming of the physicians and customs officials, it rose
to a great crescendo which fell upon the ears of all within many
hundred yards and brought an answering chorus from the throngs
who waited to extend their hands to relatives and friends.
There was prophecy in the minds of men and women aboard that
ship. Some of them had been brought into actual contact with the
war; others very near it. In the minds of all was the vision that
liberty, enlightenment and all the fruits of progress were
threatened; that if they were to be saved, somehow, this land
typified the spirit of succor; somehow the aid was to proceed
from here.
Liberty never had a more cherished meaning to men of this
Republic. In the minds of many the conviction had taken root,
that if autocracy and absolute monarchy were to be overthrown;
that "government of the people, by the people, for the people"
should "not perish from the earth," it would eventually require
from America that supreme sacrifice in devotion and blood that at
periods in the growth and development of nations, is their last
resort against the menace of external attack, and, regardless of
the reflections of theorists and philosophers, the best and
surest guarantee of their longevity; that the principles upon
which they were builded were something more than mere words,
hollow platitudes, meaning nothing, worthy of nothing, inspiring
nothing. It was the dawning of a day; new and strange in its
requirements of America whose isolation and policy, as bequeathed
by the fathers, had kept it aloof from the bickerings and
quarrels of the nations that composed the "Armed Camp" of Europe,
during which, as subsequent events proved, the blood of the
Caucasian and the Negro would upon many a hard fought pass; many
a smoking trench in the battle zone of Europe, run together in
one rivulet of departing life, for the guarantee of liberty
throughout all the earth, and the establishment of justice at its
uttermost bounds and ends.
CHAPTER IV.
AWAKENING OF AMERICA.
PRESIDENT CLINGS TO NEUTRALITY—MONROE DOCTRINE AND
WASHINGTON'S WARNING—GERMAN CRIMES AND GERMAN
VICTORIES—CARDINAL MERCIER'S LETTER—MILITARY
OPERATIONS—FIRST SUBMARINE ACTIVITIES—THE LUSITANIA
OUTRAGE—EXCHANGE OF NOTES—UNITED STATES
AROUSED—ROLE OF PASSIVE ONLOOKER BECOMES
IRKSOME—FIRST MODIFICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF WASHINGTON AND
MONROE—OUR DESTINY LOOMS.
August 4, 1914, President Wilson proclaimed the neutrality of the
United States. A more consistent attempt to maintain that
attitude was never made by a nation. In an appeal addressed to
the American people on August 18th, the president implored the
citizens to refrain from "taking sides." Part of his utterance on
that occasion was:
"We must be impartial in thought as well as in
action, must put a curb upon our sentiments as well as upon every
transaction that might be construed as a preference of one party
to the struggle before another.
"My thought is of America. I am speaking, I feel sure, the
earnest wish and purpose of every thoughtful American that this
great country of ours, which is, of course, the first in our
thoughts and in our hearts, should show herself in this time of
peculiar trial a nation fit beyond others to exhibit the fine
poise of undisturbed judgment, the dignity of self-control, the
efficiency of dispassionate action; a nation that neither sits in
judgment upon others, nor is disturbed in her own counsels, and
which keeps herself fit and free to do what is honest and
disinterested and truly serviceable for the peace of the
world.
American poise had been somewhat disturbed over the treatment of
American tourists caught in Germany at the outbreak of the war.
American sentiment was openly agitated by the invasion of Belgium
and the insolent repudiation by Germany of her treaty
obligations. The German chancellor had referred to the treaty
with Belgium as "a scrap of paper." These things had created a
suspicion in American minds, having to do with what seemed
Germany's real and ulterior object, but in the main the people of
this county accepted the president's appeal in the spirit in
which it was intended and tried to live up to it, which attitude
was kept to the very limit of human forbearance.
A few editors and public men, mostly opposed to the president
politically, thought we were carrying the principle of neutrality
too far; that the violation of Belgium was a crime against
humanity in general and that if we did not at least protest
against it, we would be guilty of national stultification if not
downright cowardice. Against this view was invoked the
time-honored principles of the Monroe Doctrine and its great
corollary, Washington's advice against becoming entangled in
European affairs. Our first president, in his farewell address,
established a precept of national conduct that up to the time we
were drawn into the European war, had become almost a principle
of religion with us. He said:
"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I
conjure you to believe me, fellow citizens) the jealousy of a
free people ought to constantly awake, since history and
experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most
baneful foes of republican government—Europe has a set of
primary interests which to us have none or a very remote
relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies,
the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concern.
Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves
by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics
or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or
enmities."
The Monroe Doctrine was a statement of principles made by
President Monroe in his famous message of December 2, 1823. The
occasion of the utterance was the threat by the so-called Holy
Alliance to interfere forcibly in South America with a view to
reseating Spain in control of her former colonies there.
President Monroe, pointing to the fact that it was a principle of
American policy not to intermeddle in European affairs, gave
warning that any attempt by the monarchies of Europe "to extend
their system to any portion of this hemisphere" would be
considered by the United States "as dangerous to our peace and
safety." This warning fell in line with British policy at the
time and so proved efficacious.
|
| OFFICIAL RED CROSS PHOTOGRAPHS NEGRO SOLDIERS AND RED CROSS
WORKERS IN FRONT OF CANTEEN, HAMLET, N.C. |
|
| PHOTO FROM UNDERWOOD & UNDERWOOD, N.Y. COLORED RED CROSS
WORKERS FROM THE CANTEEN AT ATLANTA, GA., FEEDING SOLDIERS AT
RAILWAY STATION. |
|
| OFFICIAL RED CROSS PHOTOGRAPHS COLORED WOMEN IN HOSPITAL
GARMENTS CLASS OF BRANCH NO. 6. NEW ORLEANS CHAPTER, AMERICAN RED
CROSS. LOUISE J. ROSS, DIRECTOR. |
|
| PHOTO FROM UNDERWOOD & UNDERWOOD, N.Y. RED CROSS WORKERS.
PROMINENT COLORED WOMEN OF ATLANTA, GA., WHO ORGANIZED CANTEEN
FOR RELIEF OF NEGRO SOLDIERS GOING TO AND RETURNING FROM
WAR. |
|
| THE GAME IS ON. A BASEBALL MATCH BETWEEN NEGRO AND WHITE
TROOPS IN ONE OF THE TRAINING AREAS IN FRANCE. |
|
| OFFICIAL PHOTOGRAPHS, U.S. ARMY COL. WILLIAM HAYWARD OF 369TH
INFANTRY PLAYING BASEBALL WITH HIS NEGRO SOLDIERS AT ST. NAZAIRE,
FRANCE. |
|
| JAZZ AND SOUTHERN MELODIES HASTEN CURE. NEGRO SAILOR
ENTERTAINING DISABLED NAVY MEN IN HOSPITAL FOR
CONVALESCENTS. |
|
| ENJOYING A BIT OF CAKE BAKED AT THE AMERICAN RED CROSS
CANTEEN AT IS-SUR-TILLE, FRANCE. |
|
| CORPORAL FRED. McINTYRE OF 369TH INFANTRY, WITH PICTURE OF
THE KAISER WHICH HE CAPTURED FROM A GERMAN OFFICER. |
|
| LIEUT. ROBERT L. CAMPBELL, NEGRO OFFICER OF THE 368TH
INFANTRY WHO WON FAME AND THE D.S.C. IN ARGONNE FOREST. HE
DEVISED A CLEVER PIECE OF STRATEGY AND DISPLAYED GREAT HEROISM IN
THE EXECUTION OF IT. |
|
| EMMETT J. SCOTT, APPOINTED BY SECRETARY BAKER, AS SPECIAL
ASSISTANT DURING THE WORLD WAR. HE WAS FORMERLY CONFIDENTIAL
SECRETARY TO THE LATE BOOKER T. WASHINGTON. |
|
(TOP)—GENERAL DIAZ, COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF ITALIAN ARMIES.
MARSHAL FOCH, COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF ALLIED FORCES.
(CENTER)—GENERAL PERSHING, COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF AMERICAN
ARMIES. ADMIRAL SIMS, IN CHARGE OF AMERICAN NAVAL OPERATIONS
OVERSEAS.
(BOTTOM)—KING ALBERT, COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF BELGIAN ARMY.
FIELD MARSHAL HAIG, HEAD OF BRITISH ARMIES. |
In a later section of the same message the proposition was also
advanced that the American continent was no longer subject to
colonization. This clause of the doctrine was the work of
Monroe's secretary of state, John Quincy Adams, and its occasion
was furnished by the fear that Russia was planning to set up a
colony at San Francisco, then the property of Spain, whose
natural heir on the North American continent, Adams held, was the
United States. It is this clause of the document that has
furnished much of the basis for its subsequent development.
In 1902 Germany united with Great Britain and Italy to collect by
force certain claims against Venezuela. President Roosevelt
demanded and finally, after threatening to dispatch Admiral Dewey
to the scene of action, obtained a statement that she would not
permanently occupy Venezuelan territory. Of this statement one of
the most experienced and trusted American editors, avowedly
friendly to Germany, remarked at the time, that while he believed
"it was and will remain true for some time to come, I cannot, in
view of the spirit now evidently dominant in the mind of the
emperor and among many who stand near him, express any belief
that such assurances will remain trustworthy for any great length
of time after Germany shall have developed a fleet larger than
that of the United States." He accordingly cautioned the United
States "to bear in mind probabilities and possibilities as to the
future conduct of Germany, and therefore increase gradually our
naval strength." Bismarck pronounced the Monroe Doctrine "an
international impertinence," and this has been the German view
all along.
Dr. Zorn, one of the most conservative of German authorities on
international affairs, concluded an article in Die Woche of
September 13, 1913, with these words: "Considered in all its
phases, the Monroe Doctrine is in the end seen to be a question
of might only and not of right."
The German government's efforts to check American influence in
the Latin American states had of late years been frequent and
direct. They comprised the encouragement of German emigration to
certain regions, the sending of agents to maintain close contact,
presentation of German flags in behalf of the Kaiser, the placing
of the German Evangelical churches in certain South American
countries under the Prussian State Church, annual grants for
educational purposes from the imperial treasury at Berlin, and
the like.
The "Lodge resolution," adopted by the senate in 1912, had in
view the activities of certain German corporations in Latin
America, as well as the episode that immediately occasioned it;
nor can there be much doubt that it was the secret interference
by Germany at Copenhagen that thwarted the sale of the Danish
West Indies to the United States in 1903.
In view of a report that a Japanese corporation, closely
connected with the Japanese government, was negotiating with the
Mexican government for a territorial concession off Magdalena
Bay, in lower California, the senate in 1912 adopted the
following resolution, which was offered by Senator Lodge of
Massachusetts:
"That when any harbor or other place in the American
continent is so situated that the occupation thereof for naval or
military purposes might threaten the communications or the safety
of the United States, the government of the United States could
not see without grave concern, the possession of such harbor or
other place by any corporation or association which has such a
relation to another government, not American, as to give that
government practical power of control for naval or military
purposes."
All of the above documents, arguments and events were of the
greatest importance in connection with the great European
struggle. America was rapidly awakening, and the role of a
passive onlooker became increasingly irksome. It was pointed out
that Washington's message said we must not implicate ourselves in
the "ordinary vicissitudes" of European politics. This case
rapidly was assuming something decidedly beyond the "ordinary."
As the carnage increased and outrages piled up, the finest
sensibilities of mankind were shocked and we began to ask
ourselves if we were not criminally negligent in our attitude; if
it was not our duty to put forth a staying hand and use the
extreme weight of our influence to stop the holocaust.
From August 4 to 26, Germany overran Belgium. Liege was occupied
August 9; Brussels, August 20, and Namur, August 24. The stories
of atrocities committed on the civil population of that country
have since been well authenticated. At the time it was hard to
believe them, so barbaric and utterly wanton were they. Civilized
people could not understand how a nation which pretended to be
not only civilized, but wished to impose its culture on the
remainder of the world, could be so ruthless to a small adversary
which had committed no crime and desired only to preserve its
nationality, integrity and treaty rights.
Germany did not occupy Antwerp until October 9, owing to the
stiff resistance of the Belgians and engagements with the French
and British elsewhere. But German arms were uniformly victorious.
August 21-23 occurred the battle of Mons-Charleroi, a serious
defeat for the French and British, which resulted in a dogged
retreat eventually to a line along the Seine, Marne and Meuse
rivers.
The destruction of Louvain occurred August 26, and was one of the
events which inflamed anti-German sentiment throughout the world.
The beautiful cathedral, the historic cloth market, the library
and other architectural monuments for which the city was famed,
were put to the torch. The Belgian priesthood was in woe over
these and other atrocities. Cardinal Mercier called upon the
Christian world to note and protest against these crimes. In his
pastoral letter of Christmas, 1914, he thus pictures Belgium's
woe and her Christian fortitude:
"And there where lives were not taken, and there
where the stones of buildings were not thrown down, what anguish
unrevealed! Families hitherto living at ease, now in bitter want;
all commerce at an end, all careers ruined; industry at a
standstill; thousands upon thousands of workingmen without
employment; working women; shop girls, humble servant girls
without the means of earning their bread, and poor souls forlorn
on the bed of sickness and fever crying: 'O Lord, how long, how
long?'—God will save Belgium, my brethren; you can not
doubt it. Nay, rather, He is saving her—Which of us would
have the heart to cancel this page of our national history? Which
of us does not exult in the brightness of the glory of this
shattered nation? When in her throes she brings forth heroes, our
mother country gives her own energy to the blood of those sons of
hers. Let us acknowledge that we needed a lesson in
patriotism—For down within us all is something deeper than
personal interests, than personal kinships, than party feeling,
and this is the need and the will to devote ourselves to that
most general interest which Rome termed the public thing, Res
publica. And this profound will within us is
patriotism."
Meanwhile there was a slight offset to the German successes.
Russia had overrun Galicia and the Allies had conquered the
Germany colony of Togoland in Africa. But on August 26 the
Russians were severely defeated in the battle of Tannenburg in
East Prussia. This was offset by a British naval victory in
Helgoland Bight. (August 28.) So great had become the pressure of
the German armies that on September 3 the French government
removed from Paris to Bordeaux. The seriousness of the situation
was made manifest when two days later Great Britain, France and
Russia signed a treaty not to make peace separately. Then it
became evident to the nations of the earth that the struggle was
not only to be a long one, but in all probability the most
gigantic in history.
The Germans reached the extreme point of their advance,
culminating in the Battle of the Marne, September 6-10. Here the
generalship of Joffre and the strategy of Foch overcame great
odds. The Germans were driven back from the Marne to the River
Aisne. The battle line then remained practically stationary for
three years on a front of three hundred miles.
The Russians under General Rennenkampf were driven from East
Prussia September 16. Three British armored cruisers were sunk by
a submarine September 22. By September 27 General Botha had
gained some successes for the Allies, and had under way an
invasion of German Southwest Africa. By October 13 Belgium was so
completely occupied by the Germans that the government withdrew
entirely from the country and established itself at Le Havre in
France. By the end of the year had occurred the Battle of Yser in
Belgium (October 16-28); the first Battle of Ypres (decisive day
October 31), in which the British, French and Belgians saved the
French channel ports; De Wet's rebellion against the British in
South Africa (October 28); German naval victory in the Pacific
off the coast of Chile (November 1); fall of Tsingtau, German
possession in China, to the Japanese (November 7); Austrian
invasion of Serbia (Belgrade taken December 2, recaptured by the
Serbians December 14); German commerce raider Emden caught and
destroyed at Cocos Island (November 10); British naval victory
off the Falkland Islands (December 8); South African rebellion
collapsed (December 8); French government returned to Paris
(December 9); German warships bombarded West Hartlepool,
Scarborough and Whitby on the coast of England (December 16). On
December 24 the Germans showed their Christian spirit in an
inauguration of the birthday of Christ by the first air raid over
England. The latter part of the year 1914 saw no important action
by the United States excepting a proclamation by the president of
the neutrality of the Panama canal zone.
The events of 1915 and succeeding years became of great
importance to the United States and it is with a record of those
having the greatest bearing on our country that this account
principally will deal.
On January 20 Secretary of State Bryan found it necessary to
explain and defend our policy of neutrality. January 28 the
American merchantman William P. Frye was sunk by the German
cruiser Prinz Eitel Friedrich. On February 10 the United States
dispatched a note to the German government holding it to a
"strict accountability if any merchant vessel of the United
States is destroyed or any American citizens lose their lives."
Germany replied February 16 stating that her "war zone" act was
an act of self-defense against illegal methods employed by Great
Britain in preventing commerce between Germany and neutral
countries. Two days later the German official blockade of Great
Britain commenced and the German submarines began their campaign
of piracy and pillage.
The United States on February 20 sent an identic note to Germany
and Great Britain suggesting an agreement between them respecting
the conduct of naval warfare. The British steamship Falaba was
sunk by a submarine March 28, with a loss of 111 lives, one of
which was an American. April 8 the steamer Harpalyce, in the
service of the American commission for the aid of Belgium, was
torpedoed with a loss of 15 lives. On April 22 the German embassy
in America sent out a warning against embarkation on vessels
belonging to Great Britain. The American vessel Cushing was
attacked by a German aeroplane April 28. On May 1 the American
steamship Gullflight was sunk by a German submarine and two
Americans were lost. That day the warning of the German embassy
was published in the daily papers. The Lusitania sailed at 12:20
noon.
Five days later occurred the crime which almost brought America
into the second year of the war. The Cunard line steamship
Lusitania was sunk by a German submarine with a loss of 1,154
lives, of which 114 were Americans. After the policy of
frightfulness put into effect by the Germans in Belgium and other
invaded territories, the massacres of civilians, the violation of
women and killing of children; burning, looting and pillage; the
destruction of whole towns, acts for which no military necessity
could be pleaded, civilization should have been prepared for the
Lusitania crime. But it seems it was not. The burst of
indignation throughout the United States was terrible. Here was
where the terms German and Hun became synonomous, having in mind
the methods and ravages of the barbaric scourge Attilla, king of
the Huns, who in the fifth century sacked a considerable portion
of Europe and introduced some refinements in cruelty which have
never been excelled.
The Lusitania went down twenty-one minutes after the attack. The
Berlin government pleaded in extenuation of the sinking that the
ship was armed, and German agents in New York procured testimony
which was subsequently proven in court to have been perjured, to
bolster up the falsehood. In further justification, the German
government adduced the fact that the ship was carrying ammunition
which it said was "destined for the destruction of brave German
soldiers." This contention our government rightly brushed aside
as irrelevant.
The essence of the case was stated by our government in its note
of June 9 as follows:
"Whatever be the other facts regarding the Lusitania,
the principal fact is that a great steamer, primarily and chiefly
a conveyance for passengers, and carrying more than a thousand
souls who had no part or lot in the conduct of the war, was sunk
without so much as a challenge or a warning, and that men, women
and children were sent to their death in circumstances
unparalleled in modern warfare."
Three notes were written to Germany regarding the Lusitania
sinking. The first dated May 13 advanced the idea that it was
impossible to conduct submarine warfare conformably with
international law. In the second dated June 9 occurs the
statement that "the government of the United States is contending
for something much greater than mere rights of property or
privileges of commerce. It is contending for nothing less high
and sacred than the rights of humanity." In the third note dated
July 21, it is asserted that "the events of the past two months
have clearly indicated that it is possible and practicable to
conduct submarine operations within the so-called war zone in
substantial accord with the accepted practices of regulated
warfare." The temper of the American people and the president's
notes had succeeded in securing a modification of the submarine
campaign.
It required cool statesmanship to prevent a rushing into war over
the Lusitania incident and events which had preceded it. There
was a well developed movement in favor of it, but the people were
not unanimous on the point. It would have lacked that cooperation
necessary for effectiveness; besides our country was but poorly
prepared for engaging in hostilities. It was our state of
unpreparedness continuing for a long time afterwards, which
contributed, no doubt, to German arrogance. They thought we would
not fight.
But the United States had become thoroughly awakened and the
authorities must have felt that if the conflict was to be unduly
prolonged, we must eventually be drawn into it. This is reflected
in the modified construction which the president and others began
to place on the Monroe Doctrine. The great underlying idea of the
doctrine remained vital, but in a message to congress delivered
December 7, 1915, the president said:
"In the day in whose light we now stand there is no claim of
guardianship, but a full and honorable association as of partners
between ourselves and our neighbors in the interests of America."
Speaking before the League to Enforce Peace at Washington, May
27, 1916, he said: "What affects mankind is inevitably our
affair, as well as the affair of the nations of Europe and of
Asia." In his address to the senate of January 22, 1917, he said:
"I am proposing, as it were, that the nations should with one
accord adopt the doctrine of President Monroe as the doctrine of
the world—that no nation should seek to extend its policy
over any other nation or people, but that every people should be
left free to determine its own policy, its own way of
development, unhindered, unthreatened, unafraid, the little along
with the great and powerful." This was a modifying and enlarging
of the doctrine, as well as a departure from Washington's warning
against becoming entangled with the affairs of Europe.
CHAPTER V.
HUNS SWEEPING WESTWARD.
TOWARD SHORES OF ATLANTIC—SPREAD RUIN AND
DEVASTATION—CAPITALS OF CIVILIZATION
ALARMED—ACTIVITIES OF SPIES—APOLOGIES AND
LIES—GERMAN ARMS WINNING—GAIN TIME TO FORGE NEW
WEAPONS—FEW VICTORIES FOR ALLIES—ROUMANIA
CRUSHED—INCIDENT OF U-53.
The powerful thrusts of the German armies toward the English
channel and the Atlantic ocean, the pitiless submarine policy,
and the fact that Germany and Austria had allied with them
Bulgaria and Turkey, began to spread alarm in the non-belligerent
nations of the world.
That Germany was playing a Machiavellian policy against the
United States soon became evident. After each submarine outrage
would come an apology, frequently a promise of reparation and an
agreement not to repeat the offense, with no intention, however,
of keeping faith in any respect. As a mask for their duplicity,
the Germans even sent a message of sympathy for the loss of
American lives through the sinking of the Lusitania; which but
intensified the state of mind in this country.
Less than three weeks after the Lusitania outrage the American
steamship Nebraskan was attacked (May 25) by a submarine. The
American steamship Leelanaw was sunk by submarines July 25. The
White Star liner Arabic was sunk by a submarine August 19;
sixteen victims, two American.
Our government received August 24 a note from the German
ambassador regarding the sinking of the Arabic. It stated that
the loss of American lives was contrary to the intention of the
German government and was deeply regretted. On September 1
Ambassador von Bernstorff supplemented the note with a letter to
Secretary Lansing giving assurance that German submarines would
sink no more liners.
The Allan liner Hesperian was sunk September 4 by a German
submarine; 26 lives lost, one American.
On October 5 the German government sent a communication
regretting again and disavowing the sinking of the Arabic, and
stating its willingness to pay indemnities.
Meanwhile depression existed among the Allies and alarm among
nations outside the war over the German conquest of Russian
Poland. They captured Lublin, July 31; Warsaw, August 4;
Ivangorod, August 5; Kovno, August 17; Novogeorgievsk, August 19;
Brest-Litovsk, August 25, and Vilna, September 18.
Activities of spies and plottings within the United States began
to divide attention with the war in Europe and the submarine
situation. Dr. Constantin Dumba, who was Austro-Hungarian
ambassador to the United States, in a letter to the Austrian
minister of foreign affairs, dated August 20, recommended "most
warmly" to the favorable consideration of the foreign office
"proposals with respect to the preparation of disturbances in the
Bethlehem steel and munitions factory, as well as in the middle
west."
He felt that "we could, if not entirely prevent the production of
war material in Bethlehem and in the middle west, at any rate
strongly disorganize it and hold it up for months."
The letter was intrusted to an American newspaper correspondent
named Archibald, who was just setting out for Europe under the
protection of an American passport. Archibald's vessel was held
up at Falmouth, England, his papers seized and their contents
cabled to the United States. On September 8 Secretary Lansing
instructed our ambassador at Vienna to demand Dr. Dumba's recall
and the demand was soon acceded to by his government.
On December 4 Captain Karl Boy-Ed, naval attache of the German
embassy in Washington, was dismissed by our government for
"improper activity in naval affairs." At the same time Captain
Franz von Papen, military attache of the embassy, was dismissed
for "improper activity in military matters." In an intercepted
letter to a friend in Germany he referred to our people as "those
idiotic Yankees."