WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
Infant Schools and Dissenters / A Vindication of "a letter of affectionate remonstrance," &c., from the mistakes respecting it made by William Geary ... and from the misrepresentations of it made by ... John Perowne ... in their respective pamphlets cover

Infant Schools and Dissenters / A Vindication of "a letter of affectionate remonstrance," &c., from the mistakes respecting it made by William Geary ... and from the misrepresentations of it made by ... John Perowne ... in their respective pamphlets

Chapter 4: FOOTNOTES.
Open in WeRead

About This Book

The author replies to two pamphlets that criticised his earlier letter on infant education, defending both his interpretation of a public notice and his concern that a proposed infant school society, while admitting children of all denominations, would exclude Dissenters from its committee. He reviews reported speeches and printed assurances about openness, contends that organizational exclusion undermines genuine inclusivity, and rebuts specific misrepresentations. The pamphlet combines factual correction, argument over policy and practice, appeals to Christian principle and scriptural authority, and a call for cooperative, nonsectarian arrangements in providing early education.

 

THE END.

 

Norwich:
PRINTED BY JOSIAH FLETCHER, UPPER HAYMARKET.

FOOTNOTES.

[15]  Mr. Perowne uses the expression, “our apostolical establishment,” as if there had been an Established Church in the days of the apostles.  The establishment of religion by the state, did not take place till the reign of Constantine, which was three hundred years after Christ, and when the church had become grossly corrupted by “the mystery of iniquity.”  It is still more erroneous to speak of “our apostolical establishment,” for the Protestant Church of England was not established till the time of Henry the Eighth.

[16]  A man who writes himself “reverend,” and who intermeddles with latin and logic, ought to be able to spell correctly.  “Calvanist” and “Armenian,” are wrong.  The former should be Calvinist, and the latter should be Arminian.  I hope that the Infant School system, which Mr. Perowne patronises, will not be so “exclusive” as to exclude spelling from its literature.  Let Mr. P. take advantage of this hint—for he learnedly remarks, “Licet vel ab hoste doceri.”

[28]  Mr. Warner, a clergyman of the Church of England, in his “Conformist’s Plea for the Nonconformists,” observes “It is absurd to call him a martyr, for there was too great a complication of causes which led to his execution, to ascribe it wholly or principally to religion.  The vice which ruined him was insincerity; so that his enemies saw that they could not trust him to perform his insincere though liberal promises.”