WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
Joseph Hergesheimer, an essay in interpretation cover

Joseph Hergesheimer, an essay in interpretation

Chapter 8: SEVEN
Open in WeRead

About This Book

The essay argues that prolonged early rejection shaped Hergesheimer's fiction, producing characters driven by single, unattainable desires and women depicted as ornamental, peripheral figures; it contends that the writer preferred private aesthetic aims over popular success and repeatedly stages quests for elusive beauty that culminate in physical or spiritual ruin. Linking motifs across several novels to a formative will to create, the piece analyzes recurring structure, tone, and thematic repetition while reflecting on the broader difficulty of capturing and communicating beauty in literary form.

SEVEN

Yet Mr. Hergesheimer, even in the least worthy of his magazine stories, writes really well. The phrase has an inadequate ring: but when you have applied it without any grave reservation to Mr. Tarkington and Mr. Hergesheimer, and have given Mrs. Wharton a deservedly high rating for as many merits as seem possible to a woman writer, of what other American novelists can this pardonably be said by anybody save their publishers? No: the remainder of us, whatever and however weighty may be our other merits, can manage, in this matter of sheer writing, to select and arrange our adjectives and verbs and other literary ingredients acceptably enough every now and then: and that is the utmost which honesty can assert.

But Mr. Hergesheimer always writes really well, once you have licensed his queer (and quite inexcusable) habit of so constantly interjecting proper names to explain to whom his, Hergesheimer’s, pronoun refers.... Perhaps I here drift too remotely into technicalities, and tend to substitute for a consideration of architecture a treatise upon brick-making. Even so, I cannot but note in this place how discriminatingly Mr. Hergesheimer avoids the hurdles most commonly taken with strained leaps by the “stylist,” through Mr. Hergesheimer’s parsimony in the employment of similes; and how inexplicably he renders “anything from a chimneypot to the shoulders of a duchess” by—somehow—communicating the exact appearance of the thing described without evading the whole issue by telling you it is like something else.