A philosopher investigates the faculty of judgment, arguing that reflective judgment mediates between understanding and reason and unites the theoretical and practical domains. He analyzes aesthetic judgment by distinguishing disinterested pleasure, free and dependent beauty, the sublime, genius, and the role of a shared sensus communis in claiming universal communicability. He then examines teleological judgment, treating organisms as seemingly purposive and proposing a regulative principle for interpreting natural purposiveness without positing literal final causes. Throughout the work conceptual analysis and examples are combined to show how judgment grounds aesthetic experience and supports a systematic unity between nature and moral thought.