WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
Modern Painters, Volume 1 (of 5) cover

Modern Painters, Volume 1 (of 5)

Chapter 19: SECTION II.
Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

About This Book

The author mounts a sustained defense of contemporary landscape painting against superficial criticism, arguing that painting's highest duty is truthful observation of nature combined with imaginative interpretation. He examines principles of color, light, and form, contrasts genuine feeling with theatrical affectation, and uses close readings of works to illustrate how painters render atmospheric and moral truth. The prose interleaves evocative landscape description with aesthetic theory, critiques prevailing tastes and older schools when they obscure nature, and urges a deeper, disciplined perception as the foundation of artistic judgment.

Chapter V.—Of the Relative Importance of Truths:—Thirdly, that Truths of Color are the least important of all Truths.

§  1. Difference between primary and secondary qualities in bodies. 67
§  2. The first are fully characteristic, the second imperfectly so. 67
§  3. Color is a secondary quality, therefore less important than form. 68
§  4. Color no distinction between objects of the same species. 68
§  5. And different in association from what it is alone. 69
§  6. It is not certain whether any two people see the same colors in things. 69
§  7. Form, considered as an element of landscape, includes light and shade. 69
§  8. Importance of light and shade in expressing the character of bodies, and unimportance of color. 70
§  9. Recapitulation. 71

Chapter VI.—Recapitulation.

§  1. The importance of historical truths. 72
§  2. Form, as explained by light and shade, the first of all truths. Tone, light, and color, are secondary. 72
§  3. And deceptive chiaroscuro the lowest of all. 73

Chapter VII.—General Application of the Foregoing Principles.

§  1. The different selection of facts consequent on the several aims at imitation or at truth. 74
§  2. The old masters, as a body, aim only at imitation. 74
§  3. What truths they gave. 75
§  4. The principles of selection adopted by modern artists. 76
§  5. General feeling of Claude, Salvator, and G. Poussin, contrasted with the freedom and vastness of nature. 77
§  6. Inadequacy of the landscape of Titian and Tintoret. 78
§  7. Causes of its want of influence on subsequent schools. 79
§  8. The value of inferior works of art, how to be estimated. 80
§  9. Religious landscape of Italy. The admirableness of its completion. 81
§ 10. Finish, and the want of it, how right—and how wrong. 82
§ 11. The open skies of the religious schools, how valuable. Mountain drawing of Masaccio. Landscape of the Bellinis and Giorgione. 84
§ 12. Landscape of Titian and Tintoret. 86
§ 13. Schools of Florence, Milan, and Bologna. 88
§ 14. Claude, Salvator, and the Poussins. 89
§ 15. German and Flemish landscape. 90
§ 16. The lower Dutch schools. 92
§ 17. English school, Wilson and Gainsborough. 93
§ 18. Constable, Callcott. 94
§ 19. Peculiar tendency of recent landscape. 95
§ 20. G. Robson, D. Cox. False use of the term "style." 95
§ 21. Copley Fielding. Phenomena of distant color. 97
§ 22. Beauty of mountain foreground. 99
§ 23. De Wint. 101
§ 24. Influence of Engraving. J. D. Harding. 101
§ 25. Samuel Prout. Early painting of architecture, how deficient. 103
§ 26. Effects of age upon buildings, how far desirable. 104
§ 27. Effects of light, how necessary to the understanding of detail. 106
§ 28. Architectural painting of Gentile Bellini and Vittor Carpaccio. 107
§ 29. And of the Venetians generally. 109
§ 30. Fresco painting of the Venetian exteriors. Canaletto. 110
§ 31. Expression of the effects of age on Architecture by S. Prout. 112
§ 32. His excellent composition and color. 114
§ 33. Modern architectural painting generally. G. Cattermole. 115
§ 34. The evil in an archæological point of view of misapplied invention, in architectural subject. 117
§ 35. Works of David Roberts: their fidelity and grace. 118
§ 36. Clarkson Stanfield. 121
§ 37. J. M. W. Turner. Force of national feeling in all great painters. 123
§ 38. Influence of this feeling on the choice of Landscape subject. 125
§ 39. Its peculiar manifestation in Turner. 125
§ 40. The domestic subjects of the Liber Studiorum. 127
§ 41. Turner's painting of French and Swiss landscape. The latter deficient. 129
§ 42. His rendering of Italian character still less successful. His large compositions how failing. 130
§ 43. His views of Italy destroyed by brilliancy and redundant quantity. 133
§ 44. Changes introduced by him in the received system of art. 133
§ 45. Difficulties of his later manner. Resultant deficiencies. 134
§ 46. Reflection of his very recent works. 137
§ 47. Difficulty of demonstration in such subjects. 139

SECTION II.

OF GENERAL TRUTHS.

Chapter I.—Of Truth of Tone.

§  1. Meanings of the word "tone:"—First, the right relation of objects in shadow to the principal light. 140
§  2. Secondly, the quality of color by which it is felt to owe part of its brightness to the hue of light upon it. 140
§  3. Difference between tone in its first sense and aerial perspective. 141
§  4. The pictures of the old masters perfect in relation of middle tints to light. 141
§  5. And consequently totally false in relation of middle tints to darkness. 141
§  6. General falsehood of such a system. 143
§  7. The principle of Turner in this respect. 143
§  8. Comparison of N. Poussin's "Phocion." 144
§  9. With Turner's "Mercury and Argus." 145
§ 10. And with the "Datur Hora Quieti." 145
§ 11. The second sense of the word "tone." 146
§ 12. Remarkable difference in this respect between the paintings and drawings of Turner. 146
§ 13. Not owing to want of power over the material. 146
§ 14. The two distinct qualities of light to be considered. 147
§ 15. Falsehoods by which Titian attains the appearance of quality in light. 148
§ 16. Turner will not use such means. 148
§ 17. But gains in essential truth by the sacrifice. 148
§ 18. The second quality of light. 148
§ 19. The perfection of Cuyp in this respect interfered with by numerous solecisms. 150
§ 20. Turner is not so perfect in parts—far more so in the whole. 151
§ 21. The power in Turner of uniting a number of tones. 152
§ 22. Recapitulation. 153

Chapter II.—Of Truth of Color.

§  1. Observations on the color of G. Poussin's La Riccia. 155
§  2. As compared with the actual scene. 155
§  3. Turner himself is inferior in brilliancy to nature. 157
§  4. Impossible colors of Salvator, Titian. 157
§  5. Poussin, and Claude. 158
§  6. Turner's translation of colors. 160
§  7. Notice of effects in which no brilliancy of art can even approach that of reality. 161
§  8. Reasons for the usual incredulity of the observer with respect to their representation. 162
§  9. Color of the Napoleon. 163
§ 10. Necessary discrepancy between the attainable brilliancy of color and light. 164
§ 11. This discrepancy less in Turner than in other colorists. 165
§ 12. Its great extent in a landscape attributed to Rubens. 165
§ 13. Turner scarcely ever uses pure or vivid color. 166
§ 14. The basis of gray, under all his vivid hues. 167
§ 15. The variety and fulness even of his most simple tones. 168
§ 16. Following the infinite and unapproachable variety of nature. 168
§ 17. His dislike of purple, and fondness for the opposition of yellow and black. The principles of nature in this respect. 169
§ 18. His early works are false in color. 170
§ 19. His drawings invariably perfect. 171
§ 20. The subjection of his system of color to that of chiaroscuro. 171

Chapter III.—Of Truth of Chiaroscuro.

§  1. We are not at present to examine particular effects of light. 174
§  2. And therefore the distinctness of shadows is the chief means of expressing vividness of light. 175
§  3. Total absence of such distinctness in the works of the Italian school. 175
§  4. And partial absence in the Dutch. 176
§  5. The perfection of Turner's works in this respect. 177
§  6. The effect of his shadows upon the light. 178
§  7. The distinction holds good between almost all the works of the ancient and modern schools. 179
§  8. Second great principle of chiaroscuro. Both high light and deep shadow are used in equal quantity, and only in points. 180
§  9. Neglect or contradiction of this principle by writers on art. 180
§ 10. And consequent misguiding of the student. 181
§ 11. The great value of a simple chiaroscuro. 182
§ 12. The sharp separation of nature's lights from her middle tint. 182
§ 13. The truth of Turner. 183

Chapter IV.—Of Truth of Space:—First, as Dependent on the Focus of the Eye.

§  1. Space is more clearly indicated by the drawing of objects than by their hue. 185
§  2. It is impossible to see objects at unequal distances distinctly at one moment. 186
§  3. Especially such as are both comparatively near. 186
§  4. In painting, therefore, either the foreground or distance must be partially sacrificed. 187
§  5. Which not being done by the old masters, they could not express space. 187
§  6. But modern artists have succeeded in fully carrying out this principle. 188
§  7. Especially of Turner. 189
§  8. Justification of the want of drawing in Turner's figures. 189

Chapter V.—Of Truth of Space:—Secondly, as its Appearance is dependent on the Power of the Eye.

§  1. The peculiar indistinctness dependent on the retirement of objects from the eye. 191
§  2. Causes confusion, but not annihilation of details. 191
§  3. Instances in various objects. 192
§  4. Two great resultant truths; that nature is never distinct, and never vacant. 193
§  5. Complete violation of both these principles by the old masters. They are either distinct or vacant. 193
§  6. Instances from Nicholas Poussin. 194
§  7. From Claude. 194
§  8. And G. Poussin. 195
§  9. The imperative necessity, in landscape painting, of fulness and finish. 196
§ 10. Breadth is not vacancy. 197
§ 11. The fulness and mystery of Turner's distances. 198
§ 12. Farther illustrations in architectural drawing. 199
§ 13. In near objects as well as distances. 199
§ 14. Vacancy and falsehood of Canaletto. 200
§ 15. Still greater fulness and finish in landscape foregrounds. 200
§ 16. Space and size are destroyed alike by distinctness and by vacancy. 202
§ 17. Swift execution best secures perfection of details. 202
§ 18. Finish is far more necessary in landscape than in historical subjects. 202
§ 19. Recapitulation of the section. 203

SECTION III.

OF TRUTH OF SKIES.

Chapter I.—Of the Open Sky.

§  1. The peculiar adaptation of the sky to the pleasing and teaching of man. 204
§  2. The carelessness with which its lessons are received. 205
§  3. The most essential of these lessons are the gentlest. 205
§  4. Many of our ideas of sky altogether conventional. 205
§  5. Nature, and essential qualities of the open blue. 206
§  6. Its connection with clouds. 207
§  7. Its exceeding depth. 207
§  8. These qualities are especially given by modern masters. 207
§  9. And by Claude. 208
§ 10. Total absence of them in Poussin. Physical errors in his general treatment of open sky. 208
§ 11. Errors of Cuyp in graduation of color. 209
§ 12. The exceeding value of the skies of the early Italian and Dutch schools. Their qualities are unattainable in modern times. 210
§ 13. Phenomena of visible sunbeams. Their nature and cause. 211
§ 14. They are only illuminated mist, and cannot appear when the sky is free from vapor, nor when it is without clouds. 211
§ 15. Erroneous tendency in the representation of such phenomena by the old masters. 212
§ 16. The ray which appears in the dazzled eye should not be represented. 213
§ 17. The practice of Turner. His keen perception of the more delicate phenomena of rays. 213
§ 18. The total absence of any evidence of such perception in the works of the old masters. 213
§ 19. Truth of the skies of modern drawings. 214
§ 20. Recapitulation. The best skies of the ancients are, in quality, inimitable, but in rendering of various truth, childish. 215

Chapter II.—Of Truth of Clouds:—First, of the Region of the Cirrus.

§  1. Difficulty of ascertaining wherein the truth of clouds consists. 216
§  2. Variation of their character at different elevations. The three regions to which they may conveniently be considered as belonging. 216
§  3. Extent of the upper region. 217
§  4. The symmetrical arrangement of its clouds. 217
§  5. Their exceeding delicacy. 218
§  6. Their number. 218
§  7. Causes of their peculiarly delicate coloring. 219
§  8. Their variety of form. 219
§  9. Total absence of even the slightest effort at their representation, in ancient landscape. 220
§ 10. The intense and constant study of them by Turner. 221
§ 11. His vignette, Sunrise on the Sea. 222
§ 12. His use of the cirrus in expressing mist. 223
§ 13. His consistency in every minor feature. 224
§ 14. The color of the upper clouds. 224
§ 15. Recapitulation. 225

Chapter III.—Of Truth of Clouds:—Secondly, of the Central Cloud Region.

§  1. Extent and typical character of the central cloud region. 226
§  2. Its characteristic clouds, requiring no attention nor thought for their representation, are therefore favorite subjects with the old masters. 226
§  3. The clouds of Salvator and Poussin. 227
§  4. Their essential characters. 227
§  5. Their angular forms and general decision of outline. 228
§  6. The composition of their minor curves. 229
§  7. Their characters, as given by S. Rosa. 230
§  8. Monotony and falsehood of the clouds of the Italian school generally. 230
§  9. Vast size of congregated masses of cloud. 231
§ 10. Demonstrable by comparison with mountain ranges. 231
§ 11. And consequent divisions and varieties of feature. 232
§ 12. Not lightly to be omitted. 232
§ 13. Imperfect conceptions of this size and extent in ancient landscape. 233
§ 14. Total want of transparency and evanescence in the clouds of ancient landscape. 234
§ 15. Farther proof of their deficiency in space. 235
§ 16. Instance of perfect truth in the sky of Turner's Babylon. 236
§ 17. And in his Pools of Solomon. 237
§ 18. Truths of outline and character in his Como. 237
§ 19. Association of the cirrostratus with the cumulus. 238
§ 20. The deep-based knowledge of the Alps in Turner's Lake of Geneva. 238
§ 21. Farther principles of cloud form exemplified in his Amalfi. 239
§ 22. Reasons for insisting on the infinity of Turner's works. Infinity is almost an unerring test of all truth 239
§ 23. Instances of the total want of it in the works of Salvator. 240
§ 24. And of the universal presence of it in those of Turner. The conclusions which may be arrived at from it. 240
§ 25. The multiplication of objects, or increase of their size, will not give the impression of infinity, but is the resource of novices. 241
§ 26. Farther instances of infinity in the gray skies of Turner. 242
§ 27. The excellence of the cloud-drawing of Stanfield. 242
§ 28. The average standing of the English school. 243

Chapter IV.—Of Truth of Clouds:—Thirdly, of the Region of the Rain-Cloud.

§  1. The apparent difference in character between the lower and central clouds is dependent chiefly on proximity. 244
§  2. Their marked differences in color. 244
§  3. And in definiteness of form. 245
§  4. They are subject to precisely the same great laws. 245
§  5. Value, to the painter, of the rain-cloud. 246
§  6. The old masters have not left a single instance of the painting of the rain-cloud, and very few efforts at it. Gaspar Poussin's storms. 247
§  7. The great power of the moderns in this respect. 248
§  8. Works of Copley Fielding. 248
§  9. His peculiar truth. 248
§ 10. His weakness, and its probable cause. 249
§ 11. Impossibility of reasoning on the rain-clouds of Turner from engravings. 250
§ 12. His rendering of Fielding's particular moment in the Jumieges. 250
§ 13. Illustration of the nature of clouds in the opposed forms of smoke and steam. 250
§ 14. Moment of retiring rain in the Llanthony. 251
§ 15. And of commencing, chosen with peculiar meaning for Loch Coriskin. 252
§ 16. The drawing of transparent vapor in the Land's End. 253
§ 17. The individual character of its parts. 253
§ 18. Deep-studied form of swift rain-cloud in the Coventry. 254
§ 19. Compared with forms given by Salvator. 254
§ 20. Entire expression of tempest by minute touches and circumstances in the Coventry. 255
§ 21. Especially by contrast with a passage of extreme repose. 255
§ 22. The truth of this particular passage. Perfectly pure blue sky only seen after rain, and how seen. 256
§ 23. Absence of this effect in the works of the old masters. 256
§ 24. Success of our water-color artists in its rendering. Use of it by Turner. 257
§ 25. Expression of near rain-cloud in the Gosport, and other works. 257
§ 26. Contrasted with Gaspar Poussin's rain-cloud in the Dido and Æneas. 258
§ 27. Turner's power of rendering mist. 258
§ 28. His effects of mist so perfect, that if not at once understood, they can no more be explained or reasoned on than nature herself. 259
§ 29. Various instances. 259
§ 30. Turner's more violent effects of tempest are never rendered by engravers. 260
§ 31. General system of landscape engraving. 260
§ 32. The storm in the Stonehenge. 260
§ 33. General character of such effects as given by Turner. His expression of falling rain. 261
§ 34. Recapitulation of the section. 261
§ 35. Sketch of a few of the skies of nature, taken as a whole, compared with the works of Turner and of the old masters. Morning on the plains. 262
§ 36. Noon with gathering storms. 263
§ 37. Sunset in tempest. Serene midnight. 264
§ 38. And sunrise on the Alps. 264