Appendix IV. On The Influence Of Shakspere
The instances quoted in the text can be supplemented by many others. Compare the diction and thought of the following passages:
Maid of Honour, IV., 3, 61:
Hamlet, I., 4, 39:
Maid of Honour, V., 1, 133:
Twelfth Night, II., 5, 169:
Virgin Martyr, I., 1, 177:
Julius Cæsar, II., 1, 226:
(Cf. Duke of Milan, V., 1, 128.)
Parliament of Love, II., 2, 37:
Midsummer-Night's Dream, II., 1, 205:
Two Gentlemen of Verona, IV., 2, 14:
Emperor of the East, IV., 5, 105:
Othello, III., 3, 341:
Emperor of the East, V., 2, 103:
Othello, III., 3, 330:
Othello, III., 3, 347:
Virgin Martyr, I., 1, 342:
Great Duke of Florence, IV., 2, 305:
Roman Actor, III., 1, 3:
(Cf. also Duke of Milan, I., 3, 193.)539
Coriolanus, V., 3, 29:
Duke of Milan, III., 1, 204:
2 Henry IV, IV., 5, 184:
Great Duke of Florence, II., 2, 12:
Hamlet, I., 4, 18:
(Cf. also Othello, II., 3, 78-87.)
Parliament of Love, IV., 5, 137:
Richard II, V., 1, 31:
Two Gentlemen of Verona, I., 2, 58:
Unnatural Combat, IV., 2, 6:
Henry VIII, I., 1, 132-4:
Emperor of the East, III., 1, 2:
Henry VIII, I., 1, 5:
A Very Woman, II., 1, 20:
Bondman, III., 3, 170:
Henry VIII, I., 1, 140:
Virgin Martyr, V., 2, 158:
Henry VIII, III., 2, 226:
Guardian, V., 4, 115:
Richard III, I., 4, 27:
Picture, I., 2, 17:
As You Like It, II., 7, 152:
Picture, II., 2, 136:
Othello, III., 3, 349:
Virgin Martyr, V., 2, 82:
Romeo and Juliet, IV., 3, 19:
Great Duke of Florence, III., 1, 57:
Hamlet, I., 3, 85.
Believe as You List, I., 2, 18:
Hamlet, I., 5, 107:
Old Law, IV., 1, 36:
Besides, there will be charges saved too; the same rosemary that serves for the funeral will serve for the wedding.541
Hamlet, I., 2, 180:
Parliament of Love, III., 3, 133:
Hamlet, I., 4, 15:
Guardian, V., 1, 44:
Othello, I., 1, 77:
(Cf. also IV., 1, 64.)
We may infer that Massinger studied the Folio of 1623 carefully.
Appendix V. Warburton's List
(Lansdowne MSS., B. M., 807.)
This volume contains three plays, the only survivors of Warburton's collection: The Queen of Corsica, by Fran. Jaques, The Second Maiden's Tragedy, and The Bugbears, together with a fragment of a fourth, R. Wild's Benefice.
On the back of the first leaf of this volume is attached the list of Warburton's collection, in his own hand. The entries referring to Massinger are as follows: I preserve the spelling.
The Parliament of Love is attributed to Wm. Rowley. The versification of the play which we have under that name is far above Rowley's powers, nor are there signs of collaboration in the play, as far as we can tell.
The list has been carefully discussed by Mr. W. W. Greg in his article, “The Bakings of Betsy,” in The Library (July, 1911).
[pg 169]He puts the matter thus: Warburton enters Minerva's Sacrifice and The Forc'd Lady as above. In the Stationers' Register, Sept. 9, 1653, these titles are given as alternatives for the same play. This might mean that Moseley was trying to smuggle through two plays for a single fee. Mr. Greg is inclined to give Moseley the benefit of the doubt, and to suppose that there were plays existing in divergent versions, which would justify the double titles. If, however, Moseley was honest, Warburton cannot be correct. Mr. Greg suggests that Warburton, being interested in old plays, and having access to the Stationers' Register, drew up for his own use a list, mainly based on Moseley's entries, containing the titles of such pieces as he thought it might be possible to recover, and added the names of those in his possession. The cook destroyed some of the plays, and Warburton, discovering his loss, added the famous memorandum to the text without remembering that it contained the names of plays which he did not possess. In this case the damage done by “Betsy” would not be so extensive as has been believed.
Appendix VI. A Metrical Peculiarity In Massinger
Our dramatic writers must have often felt that their metre required variety to relieve it from the dangers of facility and monotony. No doubt the same problem suggested itself to Homer and the Greek dramatists. In the former, the frequent pauses after the first foot or in the middle of the second foot, in the latter, the much-discussed pauses after the first foot, are as likely to be due to a desire for variety as to any special emphasis on the particular words thus singled out.542
In what ways did the Elizabethans secure variety?543
[pg 170]1. By the use of rhyme. This was the early solution. Massinger does not often resort to rhyme, though in some of his plays, notably in The Roman Actor, he several times employs the well-known couplet at the end of a scene.
2. By the free use of the eleven-syllable line. This was Fletcher's solution. It is astonishing how the pleasure which the occasional use of this licence gives us turns to a feeling of satiety and weakness when it is too freely employed, so that many passages in Fletcher sound like a horse with a fit of roaring.
3. In the free use of trisyllabic feet. This fact has been recently brought before the public by Mr. Bayfield in connexion with Shakspere. There is no need to quote instances of this common and easy expedient.
4. By the occasional use of short lines. As has been pointed out above,544 Massinger is a strict metrist, and does not often resort to this liberty, even in rapid conversation.
5. By skilful variation of pauses, such as we find in Milton, Tennyson, and most of our modern writers of blank verse. Massinger's flexible and meandering sentences contain many examples of such variation.
I believe that he had another shaft in his quiver. He occasionally suppressed a short syllable at the close of the line, and more rarely in the early part, with the result that an anapaestic lilt of some effectiveness makes its appearance. An example from The Emperor of the East will make this clear.
If the stresses are placed as above, it is clear that there is a syllable suppressed after the word “forlorn,” a three-syllable foot in the third place, and an anapaestic lilt, “the forlorn.”
Nor is Massinger alone in this device; instances from other poets are quoted below. This theory conflicts with the dictum [pg 171] of Schmidt in his Shaksperian lexicon, that words like “forlorn,” “complete,” “supreme,” “conceal'd,” can be stressed either on the first or second syllable, the stress being on the first syllable when the stress in the following word falls on the first syllable. Presumably Schmidt would have scanned the line in question thus:
Schmidt's dictum, however, will not explain all the cases quoted below, and it is worth considering whether it is not a simpler solution of the problem to suppose that our Elizabethan poets combined uniformity of accent with variety in the metre, sometimes applied more than once in the same line. It is clear that lines which contain a past participle like “condemned” cannot be used for the purposes of this argument, as such words may have been scanned as two syllables or three.
The following cases will support my suggestion. The list does not profess to be a complete summary of the evidence.
1. The Emperor of the East, III., 4, 139:
2. The Duke of Milan, III., 1, 32:
(Here the first foot is a trochee. Cf. infra, Nos. 6, 8, 20, 21, 36, 43, 48.)
3. The Bondman, I., 1, 65:
4. The Bondman, II., 1, 143:
5. The Bondman, III., 3, 89:
6. The Bondman, IV., 3, 192:
7. The Bondman, V., 2, 20:
8. The Renegado, I., 1, 81:
9. The Renegado, I., 3, 152:
10. The Renegado, II., 4, 58:
11. The Renegado, III., 2, 36:
12. The Renegado, IV., 3, 79:
13. The Renegado, V., 1, 7:
14. The Great Duke of Florence, I., 1, 127:
15. The Great Duke of Florence, I., 2, 29:
16. The Great Duke of Florence, II., 1, 133:
17. The Great Duke of Florence, II., 3, 66:
18. The Great Duke of Florence, III., 1, 66:
19. The Great Duke of Florence, IV., 1, 102:
20. The Great Duke of Florence, V., 2, 3:
21. The Great Duke of Florence, V., 3, 127:
22. The City Madam, III., 3, 78:
23. The Bashful Lover, III., 3, 90:
24. The Bashful Lover, IV., 2, 60:
25. The Bashful Lover, V., 3, 179:
26. A Very Woman, II., 3, 42:
27. The Unnatural Combat, IV., 1, 35:
28. Believe as You List, I., 1, 144:
29. Believe as You List, I., 2, 10:
30. Believe as You List, II., 2, 265:
31. The Guardian, I., 1, 285:
32. The Guardian, I., 2, 21:
33. Epilogue 2:
34. The Parliament of Love, II., 3, 26:
35. The Parliament of Love, III., 2, 149:
36. The Parliament of Love, IV., 1, 95:
37. The Parliament of Love, V., 1, 69:
38. The Parliament of Love, V., 1, 184:
39. The Parliament of Love, V., 1, 520:
40. The Picture, I., 1, 48:
(A highly irregular line.)
41. The Picture, I., 2, 73:
42. The Picture, I., 2, 106:
43. The Picture, I., 2, 184:
(The third foot here is u u u u.)
44. The Picture, I., 2, 248:
45. The Picture, II., 1, 35:
46. The Picture, II., 1, 66:
47. The Picture, II., 1, 165:
48. The Picture, II., 2, 286:
49. The Picture, III., 2, 40:
50. The Picture, III., 5, 161:
51. The Picture, IV., 4, 64:
52. The Picture, V., 3, 11:
(The fourth foot is u u u —.)
53. The Picture, V., 3, 40:
It will be noted that the rhythm often occurs in a broken line—i.e., a line divided between two speakers. Cf. Nos. 7, 20, 36, 44, 50, 51, 52, 53. (Cf. also The Emperor of the East, I., 1, 342.)
Cf. The False One, I., 1:
The False One, V., 4:
The Prophetess, I., 3:
The Prophetess, I., 3:
The Prophetess, III., 1:
The Lover's Progress, I., 1:
The Fair Maid of the Inn, I., 1:
Thierry and Theodoret, IV., 2:
Thierry and Theodoret, IV., 2:
Jew of Malta, I., 2:
Dr. Faustus, I., 1:
Nero, I., 4:
Rule a Wife, I., 1:
The Maid in the Mill, I., 3:
Henry VIII, II., 1, 11:
I believe that many of the rhythms from Shakespeare quoted by Schmidt and by Mr. R. Bridges in his “Milton's Prosody,” can be explained in this way.