Sewerage and Sewage Treatment

The pipes are placed far enough below the surface of the filling material so that the top of the spraying nozzle is 6 to 12 inches above the surface of the filter. If the pipes are placed near the surface they are accessible for repairs, but are exposed to temperature changes. If the pipes are large their presence near the surface of the filter may seriously affect the distribution of the sewage through the filter. If the distributing pipes are placed near the bottom of the filter they are inaccessible for repairs and the nozzles must be connected to them by means of long riser pipes. The distributing pipes should be supported by columns extending to the foundation of the filter bed, there being a column at every pipe joint with such intermediate supports as may be required. In some plants the pipes have been supported by the filtering material. Although slightly less expensive in first cost the practice of so supporting the pipes is poor, as settling of the material may break the pipe or cause leaks, and if the bed becomes clogged, removal of the material is made more difficult. Valves should be placed in the distributing system in such a manner that different sets of nozzles can be cut out at will, thus resting those portions of the filter and permitting repairs without shutting down the entire filter.

The spacing of the nozzles is fixed by the type and size of the nozzle, the available head, and the rate of filtration. Various types of sprinkler nozzles are shown in Fig. 169 and the discharge rates, head losses, and distances to which sewage is thrown for the Taylor nozzles, are shown in Fig. 170. Nozzles are available which will throw circular, square, or semicircular sprays. In the use of circular sprays there is necessarily some portion of the filter which is underdosed if the nozzles are placed at the corners of squares with the sprays tangent, and there is an overdosing of other portions if the sprays are allowed to overlap so that no portion of the filter is left without a dose. Rectangular sprays will apparently overcome these difficulties, but studies have shown that circular sprays with some overlapping, and the nozzles placed at the apexes of equilateral triangles as shown in Fig. 172 will give as satisfactory distribution as other forms.

The nozzles should be selected to give the best distribution, to consume all of the head available, and to give the proper cycle of operation. The entire head available should be consumed in order that the fewest number of nozzles may be used. An excellent study of the characteristics of various types of nozzles has been published in Bulletin No. 3 of the Engineering Experiment Station at Purdue University, 1920. As a result of the tests on the nozzles shown in Fig. 169, it was determined for all nozzles, except No. 8, that

in which Q =

the rate of discharge in cubic feet per second;

C =

a coefficient shown in Table 88;

a =

the net cross-sectional opening of the nozzle in square feet;

h =

the pressure on the nozzle in feet of water.

It is evident that if the head on the nozzles is constant and the nozzle throws a circular spray, the intensity of dosing at the circumference will be greater than nearer the center. This difficulty is overcome by so designing the dosing tank from which the sewage is fed that the head on the nozzle and the quantity thrown will vary in such a manner that the distribution over the bed is equalized. Intermittent action is obtained by an automatic siphon which commences to discharge when the tank is full and empties the tank in the period allowed for dosing. Under such conditions the tank should discharge for a longer time at the higher heads than at the lower heads as there is more territory to be covered at the higher heads. The design of the tank to do this with exactness is difficult, and the construction of the necessary curved surfaces is expensive. Where a dosing tank is used for such conditions it has been found satisfactory to construct the tank with plane sides sloping at approximately 45 degrees from the vertical (or horizontal). A tank with curved surfaces is shown in Fig. 171. The dosing siphon is usually placed in the tank as shown in the figure. The head and quantity of discharge through the nozzles can be varied also by maintaining a constant depth in a dosing tank by means of a float feed valve, and varying the head and quantity discharged to the nozzles by a butterfly valve in the main feed line, or by the use of a Taylor undulating valve designed for this purpose. The butterfly valve is opened and closed by a cam so designed and driven at such a rate that the required distribution is obtained. The Taylor undulating valve is opened and closed at a constant rate, the shape of the valve giving the required variations in head and discharge. Other methods of control have been attempted but have not been used extensively.

An example of the design of the nozzle layout and dosing tank for a sprinkling filter follows:

Let it be required to determine the nozzle layout for one acre of sprinkling filters with 5 feet available head on the nozzles.

The selection of the type of nozzle and the size of opening is a matter of judgment and experience. Nozzles with large openings are less liable to clog and fewer nozzles are needed than where small nozzles are used, but the distribution of sewage is not so even as with the use of small nozzles. In this example Taylor circular spray nozzles will be selected. Fig. 170 shows that a Taylor circular spray nozzle will discharge 22.3 g.p.m. under a head of 5 feet, and that the economical nozzle spacing will be 15.3 feet. The least number of nozzles at this spacing required for a bed of one acre in area is found as follows: In Fig. 172, let n equal the number of nozzles in a horizontal row, counting half-spray nozzles as ½, and let m equal the number of rows counting rows of half-spray nozzles as half rows.^[162] Then the number of nozzles, N, equals mn, and 15.3m × 13.2n equals 43,560 or mn equals 215.

The next step should be the design of the dosing tank and siphon. It is possible to design a tank which will give equal distribution over equal areas of filter surface. It has been found, however, that the expense of this refinement is unwarranted as there are a number of outside factors which tend to overcome the theoretical design. The effect of wind, unequal spacing, and irregularities in the elevation of the nozzles have a tendency to offset refinements in the design of a dosing tank. It is therefore the general practice to slope the sides of the tank at an angle of about 45 degrees as previously stated. The dosing tank is generally designed to have a capacity which will give a complete cycle of operation once in 15 minutes. In the ordinary design the factors given are the rate of inflow and the given time of filling. In the following example the time of filling will be taken as 10 minutes, the time of emptying as 5 minutes, and the rate of flow as 1,000,000 gallons per day. The capacity of the tank will therefore be 1,000,000
24 x 6 = 7,000 gallons. The diameter of the siphon to be selected can be computed as follows:

The integration of this expression is tedious. Its solution for siphons between 6 inches and 12 inches operating under heads commencing from 3 feet to 6 feet, with a time of emptying of 5 minutes and time of filling of 10 minutes is given in Fig. 173. In the example given the rate of inflow is 1.55 sec. feet and the head is 5 feet. Then from Fig. 173 the size of the siphon to be used is 12 inches. Where a siphon of the size required to empty the tank in the time fixed is not available, combinations of available sizes can sometimes be used.

For example, if the given head is 6 feet, and the rate of inflow is 1.4 sec. feet, it is evident from Fig. 173 that a 6,300–gallon dosing tank and two 8–inch siphons will give the required cycle.

The method used for the design of the setting of Taylor nozzles by the Pacific Flush Tank Co., is less rational but more simple and probably as satisfactory. In this method the steps are as follows:

(1) Divide the maximum daily rate of sewage flow by 1,000 to get the maximum minute inflow.

(2) The number of nozzles required is determined by dividing the preceding figure by 6. Generally a Taylor nozzle with an orifice of ⅞ of an inch will discharge about 20 g.p.m. at the high head and about 8 g.p.m. at the low head, and as the nozzles must have a capacity which will take care of the inflow at the low head, the divisor 6 is used as a factor of safety instead of using 8 as the divisor.

(3) The type of nozzle to be used is selected from experience or as a matter of judgment. Circular-spray nozzles are more generally used.

(4) The spacings are determined from Fig. 170.

(5) The dosing tank of the shape described is then designed. The capacity is such as to give a complete cycle once every 15 minutes. The method of this design is similar to that followed previously.

(6) The dosing siphons are designed so that they will have a capacity at the minimum head of from 40 to 50 per cent in excess of the maximum minute inflow, and the draining depth of the siphon will be limited to a maximum of 5 to 5½ feet. The siphons are all made adjustable with a variation of 6 inches or more on either side of the normal discharge line so that the spraying area and cycle can be varied to secure the best results.

The underdrainage of a trickling filter should consist of some form of false bottom such as the types shown in Fig. 174. Where possible the underdrains should be open at both ends for the purpose of ventilation and flushing. It is desirable that the drains be so arranged that a light can be seen through them in order that clogging can be easily located. The drains should be placed on a slope of approximately 2 in 100 towards a main collector. The length of the drains is limited by their capacity to carry the average dose from the area drained by them. The main collecting conduits must be designed in accordance with the hydraulic principles given in Chapter IV. No valves, or other controlling apparatus, are placed on the underdrains or outlets from the filter.

Covers have been provided in winter for some trickling filters in cold climates. The Taylor sprinkling nozzle has been found to work successfully in extremely cold weather, and it is generally accepted that the covering of filters is unnecessary, if the filter is not to be shut down for any length of time in cold weather.

The operation of devices for automatically controlling the operation of a trickling filter is explained in Chapter XXI.

258. Intermittent Sand Filter.—An intermittent sand filter is a specially prepared bed of sand, or other fine grained material, on the surface of which sewage is applied intermittently, and from which the sewage is removed by a system of underdrains. It differs from broad irrigation in the character of the material, the care and preparation of the bed, and the thoroughness of the underdrainage. A distinctive feature of the intermittent sand filter is the quality of the effluent delivered by it. In a properly designed and operated plant the effluent is clear, colorless, odorless, and sparkling. It is completely nitrified, is stable and contains a high percentage of dissolved oxygen. It contains no settleable solids except at widely separated periods when a small quantity may appear in the effluent. The percentage removal of bacteria may be from 98 to 99 per cent. Some analyses of sand filter effluents are given in Table 89. The dissolved solids, the remaining bacteria, and the antecedents of the effluent are the only differences between it and potable water. An effluent from an intermittent sand filter is the most highly purified effluent delivered by any form of sewage treatment. The effluent can be disposed of without dilution, on account of its high stability. The treatment of sewage to so high a degree is seldom required, so that the use of intermittent filters is not common. Other drawbacks to their use are the relatively large area of land necessary and the difficulty of obtaining good filter sand in all localities.

The action in an intermittent sand filter is more complete than in other forms of filters because a greater surface is exposed to the passage of sewage by the fine sand particles, and the sewage is in contact with the filtering material a longer time due to the lower rate of filtration and the slow velocity of flow through the filter. It is essential that the sewage be applied to the bed intermittently in order that air shall be entrained in the filter. The period between doses should not be so long that the filter becomes dry.

In the operation of an intermittent sand filter one dose per day is considered an ordinary rate of application, although some plants operate with as many as four doses per day per filter, and others on one dose at long and irregular intervals. It is not always necessary to rest the filter for any length of time unless signs of overloading and clogging are shown. The intermittent dosing action may be obtained by the action of an automatic siphon as is described in Chapter XXI. The sewage is distributed on the beds through a number of openings in the sides of distributing troughs resting on the surface of the filter. The sewage is withdrawn from the bottom of the filter through a system of underdrains, into which it enters after its passage through the bed. There are no control devices on the outlet, as the rate of filtration is controlled by the action of the dosing apparatus and the rate at which sewage is delivered to it. The action of the dosing apparatus should respond quickly to variations in sewage flow. As the doses are applied to a sand filter, a mat of organic matter or bacterial zoöglea is formed on the surface of the bed. The mat is held together by hair, paper, and the tenacity of the materials. It may attain a thickness of ¼ to ½ an inch before it is necessary to remove it. So long as the filter is draining with sufficient rapidity this mat need not be removed, but if the bed shows signs of clogging, the only cleaning that may be necessary will be the rolling up of this dried mat. It is believed that the greater portion of the action in the filter occurs in the upper 5 to 8 inches of the bed, but occasionally the beds become so clogged that it is necessary to remove ¾ of an inch to 2 inches of sand in addition to the surface mat, or to loosen up the surface by shallow plowing or harrowing. The necessity for such treatment may indicate that the filter is being overloaded as a result of which the rate of filtration should be decreased or the preliminary treatment should be improved. The plowing of clogging material into the bed should be avoided as under these conditions the final condition of the bed will be worse than its condition when trouble was first observed.

In winter the surface of the bed should be plowed up into ridges and valleys. The freezing sewage forms a roof of ice which rests on the ridges and the subsequent applications of sewage find their way into the filter through the valleys under the ice. In a properly operated bed the filtering material will last indefinitely without change. If a filter is operated at too high a rate, however, although the quality of the effluent may be satisfactory, it will be necessary at some time to remove the sand and restore the filter.

The rate of filtration depends on the character of the influent, the desired quality of the effluent, and the depth and character of the filtering material. Filters can be found operating at rates of 50,000 gallons per acre per day and others at eight times this rate. For sewage which has had some preliminary treatment, the rate should not exceed 100,000 gallons per acre per day, whereas the rate for raw sewage should be less than this. For rough estimates made without tests of the sewage in question, the rate should not be taken at more than 1,000 persons per acre. If the preliminary treatment of the sewage has been thorough and the material of the sand filter is coarser than ordinary the rate of filtration can be high. For less careful preliminary treatment and fine filtering material the rates must be reduced. The sewage must undergo sufficient preliminary treatment to remove large particles of solid matter which would otherwise clog the dosing apparatus and the filter. This treatment should include grit removal, screening, and some form of tank treatment. Some plants have operated successfully with a stale sewage and no preliminary treatment, as at Brockton, Mass. Septic tank effluent can be treated successfully on an intermittent sand filter, but not so satisfactorily as the effluent from a tank delivering a fresh sewage.

The material of the filter should consist of clean, sharp, quartz or silica sand with an effective size^[164] of 0.2 to 0.4 mm., preferably about 0.25 to 0.35 mm., and a uniformity coefficient^[165] of 2 to 4. Within the limits mentioned no careful attention need be given to the size of the material. Natural sand found in place has been underdrained and used successfully for sewage treatment. The size of the sand is fixed by the rate of filtration rather than the bacteriological action of the filter. A coarse sand will permit the sewage to pass through the bed too rapidly, and a fine sand will hold it too long or will become clogged. The same size of material should be used throughout the bed, except that a layer of gravel from 6 to 12 inches thick, graded from very small sizes to stones just passing a 2–inch ring should be placed at the bottom to facilitate the drainage of the bed.

The thickness of the sand layer should not be less than 30 inches to insure complete treatment of the sewage. In shallower beds the sewage might trickle through without adequate treatment. Beds are ordinarily made from 30 to 36 inches deep, but when deeper layers of sand are found in place there is no set limit to the depth which may be used. The shape and overall dimensions of the bed should conform to the topography of the site and the rate of filtration adopted. A plan and cross-section of an intermittent sand filter showing the distribution and under drainage systems are given in Fig. 166 and 175.

The distribution system consists of a system of troughs on the surface of the filter, laid out in a branching form, as shown in the figure. The openings in the troughs should be so located that the maximum distance from any point on the bed to the nearest opening should not exceed 20 to 30 feet. If the filters are small enough, troughs need not be used, the sewage being distributed from one corner, or from mid-points on the sides. Where troughs are used they should be supported from the bottom of the filter in order to prevent uneven settling due to the washing of the sand. The openings in the troughs are made adjustable by swinging gates as shown in Fig. 176, or by other means so that after the filter is in operation the intensity of the dose on any portion of the filter can be changed. The troughs may be placed with their bottoms level with the surface of the sand and with sides of sufficient height to give the required gradient to the water surface, or they may be built up above the surface of the filter and given the required slope so that the surface of the flowing water is parallel to the bottom of the trough. In either case a splash plate should be placed at each opening, so that not less than 2 feet of the surface of the sand is protected in all directions from the opening. A stone or concrete slab 2 to 4 inches thick makes a satisfactory splash plate. Either wood or concrete may be used for the construction of the troughs. The former is less durable, but also less expensive in first cost. The capacity of the troughs may be computed by Kutter’s formula with the quantity to be carried equal to the maximum rate of discharge of the feeding siphon, with a reduction in size below each branch or outlet proportional to the amount which will be discharged above this point.

The operation of automatic devices for dosing the bed is explained in Chapter XXI. The dosing tank should have a capacity sufficient to cover the bed to a depth of about 1 to 3 inches at one dose, and the siphon should discharge at a rate of about one second-foot for each 5,000 square feet of filter area. A dose should disappear within 20 minutes to half an hour after it is applied to the filter. With the rate stated and four applications per day to a depth of 1 inch at each dose, the rate per acre per day will be 109,000 gallons.

The filtration of sewage through sand in a manner similar to the rapid sand filtration of water is being attempted at the Great Lakes Naval Training Station. No results of this treatment have been published and the practical success of the method has not been assured.

259. Cost of Filtration.—Only comparative figures can be given in stating the costs of filtration, as most data available are based on pre-war conditions, and are therefore unreliable for present conditions. The variations from the figures given may be very large but in general the relative costs have not changed. The figures given in Table 90 are suggestive of the relative costs of the different forms of filtration.

Irrigation

260. The Process.—Broad irrigation is the discharge of sewage upon the surface of the ground, from which a part of the sewage evaporates and through which the remainder percolates, ultimately to escape in surface drainage channels. Sewage farming is broad irrigation practiced with the object of raising crops. Broad irrigation can be accomplished successfully without the growing of crops, but it is seldom attempted as some return and sometimes even a profit can be obtained from the crops raised. Broad irrigation and sewage farming differ from intermittent sand filtration in the intensity of the application of the sewage, the method of preparing the area on which the sewage is to be treated, and the care in operation. In broad irrigation and intermittent sand filtration the paramount consideration is successful disposal of the sewage. In sewage farming the paramount consideration is the growing of crops. The growing of crops may be combined with irrigation and filtration, however, but the crop should be sacrificed to the successful disposal of the sewage.

The change which occurs in the characteristics of the sewage due to its filtration through the ground is the same as occurs in aërobic filtration. The effect on the crops is mainly that of an irrigant, as the manurial value of the sewage is small.

261. Status.—The disposal of sewage by broad irrigation was practiced in England previous to the development of any of the more intensive biologic methods of treatment. It was considered the only safe and sanitary method for the disposal of sewage, and as a result, areas irrigated by sewage were common throughout England. Crops were grown on these areas as a minor consideration, and sewage farming gained some of its popularity from the apparent success of these disposal areas. The success of sewage farms is due more to generous irrigation in dry years than to fertilization by sewage.

The sewage farms of Paris and Berlin are frequently cited as examples of the successful and remunerative disposal of sewage by farming in connection with broad irrigation. Kinnicutt, Winslow, and Pratt^[169] state:

The Berlin Sewage farms offer examples of broad irrigation under better conditions ... of 21,008 acres receiving sewage, 16,657 acres were farmed by the city, 3,956 acres were leased to farmers, and only 395 acres were unproductive. The contributing population at this time was 2,064,000 and the average amount of sewage treated was 77,000,000 gallons, giving a daily rate of treatment of about 3,700 gallons per acre of prepared land. The soil is sandy and of excellent quality. A quarter of the area operated by the authorities is devoted to pasturage, and about a third to the cultivation of cereals, of which winter rye and oats are the most important. Potatoes and beets are grown in considerable amounts and a wide variety of other crops in smaller proportions.... Even fish ponds are made to yield a part of the revenue, and the drains on some of the farms have been successfully stocked with breed trout.

The cost of the Berlin farms to March 31, 1910, was $17,470,000, somewhat more than half being the purchase price of the land. The expenses for this year amounted to $1,300,385 for maintenance, and $741,818 for interest charges. The receipts were $1,240,773 and there was an estimated increase of $122,593 in value of live stock and other property.

The conditions at Berlin are quoted at length to indicate the success which can accompany broad irrigation, and as an example of what is being done abroad, where the rainfall is light and the soil is suitable.

In the United States success in sewage farming has not been marked. This may be due partially to the relative weakness of American sewages, to the cost of labor, to lack of satisfactory irrigation areas, and to inattention to details. An attempt was made to grow crops on the sand filters at Brockton, Mass., but it was finally abandoned as the interests of the crops and the successful treatment of the sewage could not both be satisfied. At Pullman, Illinois,^[170] in 1880, there was commenced probably the most extensive attempt at sewage farming in eastern United States. The farm was a failure from the start, because of the clay soil, and it was subsequently abandoned. Sewage farming, mainly as a subsidiary consideration to the filtration of sewage, is practiced in a few cities in the eastern portion of the United States to-day. Among the cities mentioned by Metcalf and Eddy^[171] are Danbury, Conn., and Fostoria, Ohio. In the western portion of the United States where water is scarce and the ground is porous, sewage has been used as an irrigant with some success. Such use of sewage cannot be considered as a method of treatment since the prime consideration is the growing of crops. In this process all sewage not used as an irrigant is discharged without treatment into water courses. According to Metcalf and Eddy there were 35 cities in California in 1914 that were operating sewage farms. Among these are Pasadena, Fresno, and Pomona. Other farms, notably the pioneer farm at Cheyenne, Wyo., have been abandoned because of the local nuisance created and the lack of financial success.

262. Preparation and Operation.—A porous sandy soil on a good slope and with good underdrainage is most suitable for broad irrigation. Impervious clay or gumbo soils are unsuitable and should not be used. They become clogged at the surface, forming pools of putrefying sewage, or in hot weather form cracks which may permit untreated sewage to escape into the underdrains.

The sewage may be distributed to the irrigated area in any one of five ways which are known as: flooding, surface irrigation, ridge and furrow irrigation, filtration, and subsurface irrigation. In flooding, sewage is applied to a level area surrounded by low dikes. The depth of the dose may be from 1 inch to 2 feet. In surface irrigation the sewage is allowed to overflow from a ditch over the surface of the ground into which it sinks or over which it flows into another ditch placed lower down. This ditch conducts it to a point of disposal or to another area requiring irrigation. Ridge and furrow irrigation consists in plowing a field into ridges and furrows and filling the furrows with sewage while crops are grown on or between the ridges. In filtration the sewage is distributed in any desired fashion on the surface and is collected by a system of underdrains after it has filtered through the soil. In subsurface irrigation the sewage is applied to the land through a system of open-joint pipes laid immediately below the surface, similarly to a system of underdrains. Combinations of and modifications to these methods are sometimes made. Underdrains may be used in connection with any of these forms of distribution.

The preparation of the ground consists in: the construction of ditches or dikes to permit of any of the above described methods of application, grading of the surface to prevent pooling, the laying of underdrains, and the grubbing and clearing of the land. The main carriers may be excavated in open earth or earth lined with an impervious material. The distribution of the sewage from the main carriers to groups of laterals may be controlled by hand-operated stop planks. If the soil has a tendency to become waterlogged it may be relieved by installing underdrains at depths of 3 to 6 feet, and 40 to 100 feet apart. The tile underdrains may discharge into open ditches excavated for the purpose which serve also to drain the land. Drains should be used where the ground water is within 4 feet of the surface, and the open ditches should be cut below the drains to keep the ground water out of them. Four or 6–inch open-joint farm tile may be used for underdrains. The porosity of the soil will be increased by cultivation. Where particular care is taken in the cultivation of the soil so that sewage can be applied at a high rate, broad irrigation merges into the more intensive intermittent filtration through sand.

Before being turned on to the land, sewage should be screened and heavy-settling particles should be removed. The rate of application may be increased as the intensity of the preliminary treatment is increased. The rate at which sewage may be applied is dependent also on the character of the soil, and may vary between 4,000 and 30,000 gallons per acre per day, although higher rates have been used with the effluent from treatment plants and on favorable soil. The sewage should be applied intermittently in doses, the time between doses varying between one day and two or three weeks or more, dependent on the weather and the condition of the soil. The methods of dosing vary as widely as the rates. The dose may be applied continuously for one or two weeks with correspondingly long rests, or it may be applied with frequent intermittency alternated with short rests, interspersed with long rest periods at longer intervals of time. When applying the sewage to the land the rate of application of the dose is about 10,000 to 150,000 gallons per acre per day. The area under irrigation at any one time may be as much as 10 to 15 acres. The rate of the application of the sewage is also dependent on the weather and may vary widely between seasons. It is obvious that a rain-soaked pasture cannot receive a large dose of sewage without danger of undue flooding. One of the principal difficulties with the treatment or disposal of sewage by broad irrigation is that the greatest load of sewage must be cared for in wet seasons when the ground is least able to absorb the additional moisture.

263. Sanitary Aspects.—A well-operated sewage farm should cause no offense to the eye or nose, and is not a danger to the public health. In Berlin, a portion of the sewage farms are laid out as city parks. The liquid in the drainage ditches or underdrains may be clear, odorless, and colorless, high in nitrates and non-putrescible. Where the farm has been improperly managed or overdosed the condition may be serious from both esthetic and health considerations. Sewage may be spread out to pollute the atmosphere and to supply breeding places for flying insects which will spread the filth for long distances surrounding the farm. The character of the crop is also a sanitary consideration.

264. The Crop.—From a sanitary viewpoint no crops which come in contact with the sewage should be cultivated on a sewage farm. Such products as lettuce, strawberries, asparagus, potatoes, radishes, etc., should not be grown. Grains, fruits, and nuts are grown successfully and as they do not come in contact with the sewage there is no sanitary objection to their cultivation in this manner. Italian rye grass and other forms of hay are grown with the best success as they will stand a large amount of water without injury. The raising of stock is also advisable for sewage farms where hay and grain are cultivated. The stock should be fed with the fodder raised on the irrigated lands and should not be allowed to graze on the crops during the time that they are being irrigated. This is due as much to the danger of injury to the distributing ditches and the formation of bogs by the trampling of the cattle, as to the danger to the health of the cattle.