WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
The American Railway: Its Construction, Development, Management, and Appliances cover

The American Railway: Its Construction, Development, Management, and Appliances

Chapter 41: TRUNK LINES COMPARED.
Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

About This Book

The volume presents a thorough illustrated survey of railroad engineering, equipment, and administration, tracing technological evolution and practical methods for locating, constructing, and maintaining lines. Chapters cover surveying and roadbed work, bridge and tunnel construction, track-laying and upkeep, locomotive and car design and mechanics, and large-scale engineering feats such as viaducts and cantilevers. It also examines organizational and legal aspects of railway management, staffing, operations, and safety practices, discusses construction under difficult conditions and underwater foundations, and highlights innovations and appliances that shaped operations, maintenance, and traffic interchange.


STATISTICAL RAILWAY STUDIES.[37]

By FLETCHER W. HEWES.

Railway Mileage of the World—Railway Mileage of the United States—Annual Mileage and Increase—Mileage Compared with Area—Geographical Location of Railways—Centres of Mileage and of Population—Railway Systems—Trunk Lines Compared: By Mileage; Largest Receipts; Largest Net Results—Freight Traffic—Reduction of Freight Rates—Wheat Rates—The Freight Haul—Empty Freight Trains—Freight Profits—Passenger Traffic—Passenger Rates—Passenger Travel—Passenger Profits—General Considerations—Dividends—Net Earnings per Mile and Railway Building—Ratios of Increase—Construction and Maintenance—Employees and their Wages—Rolling Stock—Capital Invested.

Although the United States was the second nation to open a line of railway, it operates to-day nearly half the mileage of the world, and it has so many miles of double, triple, and quadruple track that, were the data of trackage available, such a comparison would undoubtedly show it to more than equal all the rest of the world combined.

Below is given a chart comparing the mileage of the principal railway countries. The list contains all countries having a mileage of over ten thousand kilometers.

Countries.Kilo-Principal Railway Countries, 1887.
meters.
25,000 Kilometers
Italy11,759»»50,000
Australia15,297»»» 75,000
Canada19,883»»»» 100,000
British India22,665»»»» 125,000
Austria-Hungary24,432»»»» 150,000
Russia28,517»»»»» 175,000
France31,208»»»»»» 200,000
Great Britain31,521»»»»»» 225,000
Germany39,785»»»»»»» 250,000
United States241,210»»»»»»»»»»»» »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

The most prominent fact is impressed by the very long line representing the mileage of the United States. A second impressive fact is that the United States has more than six times the mileage of any other country. A third, that there are but five other countries that have even a tenth as much railway.

RAILWAY MILEAGE OF THE UNITED STATES.

Total Annual Mileage and Increase.—On page 429 is given a chart which, beginning with the 23 miles of 1830 and ending with the 156,082 miles of 1888, delineates our ever-increasing total mileage. It also portrays the fluctuations in the number of miles built annually. This latter study is the more interesting, especially during the last twenty-five years, which cover the periods of extreme activity.

Mileage Compared with Area.—The shaded map on the same page pictures the railway mileage of each State as compared with its total area. The eleven States bearing the deepest shade (5) are those having the larger proportions of mileage to area. Of these, New Jersey stands first, having almost exactly one-fourth of a mile of railroad for each square mile of land. The proportion of total area occupied by this mileage is measured to the eye by the accompanying diagram.

Mileage to Area in New Jersey.

The entire square stands for one square mile of land, and the space at the upper left-hand corner stands for that part of the square mile which the railroad occupies, counting from fence to fence on each side of the road. This comparison is made on the basis of one hundred feet for the "right of way" (the width allowed in government grants), and is useful in connection with the study of the historical maps, especially those of 1880 and 1889, on which the area of some of the States seems to be nearly all taken up with roads, owing to the small scale of the maps. Iowa has the smallest proportion of any in Group 5. The figures show her proportion to be a little over one-seventh of a mile of road to one square mile of area. (Nevada has the smallest proportion of all the States and Territories, viz., a trifle over 1/117 of a mile of line to one square mile.)

That part of the map bearing the deepest shade shows at a glance that an unbroken belt, averaging some two hundred miles wide, stretching from Cape Cod to beyond the Mississippi River, is that part of the country best supplied with railways.

The lighter shades grouped on either side of this belt show how the mileage grades away north and south.

GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION OF RAILWAYS.

On pages 430 to 433 is a series of historical maps showing the location of railway lines at each census-year from 1830 to 1880, and in 1889. Charts comparing and ranking the mileage by States accompany the maps of 1870, 1880, and 1889. These maps and charts give a better idea of the location and extent of progress than could be given by a dozen pages of description and a hundred columns of figures.

Centre of Mileage and of Population.—The space for notes on the maps permits the bare mention of the meaning of the series of stars in the 1889 map (page 433), which mark the centres of mileage and of population. It is well to state the manner of determining the centres of mileage, that it may have its proper bearing in any study of the subject into which the showing may enter.

The locations are necessarily approximate. Each centre was determined by selecting, on the proper map, a line running east and west which seemed, to the eye, to nearly divide the mileage into equal parts. The sum of the mileage of the States north, was then compared with that of the States south of the line. By this means the position of the line chosen by the eye was corrected and the right parallel determined. The meridian dividing the total mileage into equal parts was ascertained in like manner. The point of intersection of the parallel and meridian is marked in the map by a star, having the proper date printed to the right of it.

The upper series of stars locates the centres of railway mileage, and the lower series the centres of population, as given by the returns of the census of 1880.

The following table describes the several locations thus ascertained:

Centres of Railway Mileage.

Date.Latitude.Longitude.Approximate location by towns.
184040° 50′ N.76° 10′ W.Twenty miles west of Mauch Chunk, Pa.
185041° 30′ N.77° 27′ W.Twenty-five miles northwest of Williamsport, Lycoming County, Pa.
186040° 40′ N.82° 30′ W.Ten miles south of Mansfield, O.
187041° 10′ N.84° 35′ W.Paulding, Paulding County, O.
188041° 05′ N.86° 50′ W.Thirty miles northwest of Logansport, Ind.
188839° 50′ N.88° 40′ W.Pontiac, Ill., about ninety miles S. S. W. of Chicago.

The remarkable movement of the centre of mileage from 1850 to 1860 is easily understood when one turns to the maps of those dates (page 430) and locates the fields of activity. The wonderful increase in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Iowa gave the Western impulse, while the growth in Tennessee and the States south of it furnishes the principal explanation of the southerly motion.

Although the study of this period is the most interesting of the series, in the space passed over, yet each period has its points of special interest, which the reader will easily solve by referring to the proper maps on pages 430 to 433.

Railway Systems.—The consolidation of separate lines under central controlling interests has resulted in several "systems" of great extent. Five such are mapped on pages 434 and 435. The roads controlled by them are printed in broad lines, while all others are printed in narrow lines. It needs but a glance to see whether any of them has so far absorbed the roads of a given region as to be able to control rates. The systems selected are believed to be representative ones, and the mapping of a dozen others would not tell the story any more plainly.

TRUNK LINES COMPARED.

Compared by Mileage.—At present there are twenty-four corporations reporting over one thousand miles of line each. A comparison of these roads by mileage is profitless, as it furnishes no just clew to their importance in point of business transacted. Several of the shorter of these twenty-four lines largely exceed some of the longer ones in the volume of business transacted. As an example of the little value of comparison by mileage, the New York Central & Hudson River Road, with but 1,421 miles of line, reports $63,132,920 receipts, while the Union Pacific, with 6,288 miles, reports but $19,898,817. Two of the twenty-four roads, viz., the Southern Pacific Railroad (5,931 miles) and the Richmond, West Point & Terminal Railroad (6,869 miles) report neither gross or net earnings. The remaining twenty-two report both, and these reports furnish a satisfactory basis for study.

Railway Mileage of the United States.Compared with Area, 1888.

Explanatory.—The horizontal black lines below interpret the right-hand column of figures, and therefore picture the annual total mileage of railways operated.—The color below interprets the left-hand column, and therefore pictures the fluctuations in the number of miles built annually.

The Key explains the shades on the map. The lightest shade indicates an average of less than one-fiftieth of a mile of railway for each square mile of land. The second shade, from one-fiftieth to one-twentieth of a mile of railway, for each square mile of land, etc.

KEY TO SHADES ON THE MAP.

Less than1/50 m. to 1 sq. m.1
1/50 m. —1/20 m.  "  "  "   "2
1/20 m. —1/15 m.  "  "  "   "3
1/15 m. —1/8  m.  "  "  "   "4
1/8 m. andover, per    "   "5

Total and Increase.

YearsMiles.
BuiltOperated
183023
18317295
1832134229
1833151380
1834253633
18354651,098
18361751,273
18372241,497
18384161,913
18393892,302
18405162,818
18417173,535
18424914,026
18431594,185
18441924,377
18452564,633
18462974,930
18476685,598
18483985,996
18491,3697,365
18501,6569,021
18511,96110,982
18521,92612,908
18532,45215,360
18541,36016,720
18551,65418,374
18563,64222,016
18572,48724,503
18582,46526,963
18591,82128,789
18601,84630,635
186165131,286
186283432,120
18631,05033,170
186473833,908
18651,17735,085
18661,71636,801
18672,24939,250
18682,97942,229
18694,61546,844
18706,07052,914
18717,37960,293
18725,87866,171
18734,09770,268
18742,11772,385
18751,71174,096
18762,71276,808
18772,28079,088
18782,67981,767
18794,81786,584
18806,71293,296
18819,847103,143
188211,569114,712
18836,743121,455
18843,924125,379
18852,930128,309
18868,100136,409
188712,872149,281
18886,801156,082

Railways in the United States, 1830–1860.

(From Scribner's Statistical Atlas.)

Note.—These maps are reductions of larger maps referred to in the titles. This makes it possible to bring them within very convenient space for comparison, and compensates for any indistinctness of lettering in the maps.

The railways of 1830 are pointed out by red arrows. Those of the other maps are easily seen. The growth by decades is thus quickly located. In 1840, one continuous line stretched from New York to Washington, D. C. Another considerable line was that from Fredericksburg, Va., to Wilmington, N. C. In 1850, one could not go by direct railway from New York to either Albany or Boston. In 1860, several direct routes stretched from New York to far west of the Mississippi.

Note.—In 1860 there was also in California, a railway from Sacramento to Folsom City (22 miles).

Railways in the United States. 1870

(From Scribner's Statistical Atlas.)

Railway Mileage by States, 1870.

RankStateMiles
41Dak.65»
40R.I.136»
39Colo.157»»
38Oreg.159»»
37Del.197»»
36Ark.256»»»
35Utah257»»»
34W. Va.387»»»»1,000 Miles
33Fla.446»»»»
32La.450»»»»
31Wyo.459»»»»
30Nev.593»»»»»
29Vt.614»»»»»
28*Md.671»»»»»»
27Nebr.705»»»»»»»
26Tex.711»»»»»»»2,000
25N.H.736»»»»»»»
24Conn.742»»»»»»»
23Me.786»»»»»»»3,000
22Cal.925»»»»»»»»
21Miss.990»»»»»»»»
20Ky.1,017»»»»»»»»
19Minn.1,092»»»»»»»»»
18N.J.1,125»»»»»»»»»4,000
17S.C.1,139»»»»»»»»»
16Ala.1,157»»»»»»»»»»
15N.C.1,178»»»»»»»»»»
14Mass.1,480»»»»»»»»»»»5,000
13Va.1,488»»»»»»»»»»»»
12Tenn.1,492»»»»»»»»»»»»
11Kans.1,501»»»»»»»»»»»»
10Wis.1,525»»»»»»»»»»»»»
9Mich.1,638»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
8Ga.1,845»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
7Mo.2,000»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
6Iowa2,683»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
5Ind.3,177»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
4Ohio3,538»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
3N.Y.3,924»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
2Pa.4,658»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
1Ill. 4,823»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» 

* Includes District of Columbia.

In 1850 Chicago had one short road. In 1860 she had several main lines, reaching hundreds of miles.—east, west, north, and south. In 1850, Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois were open fields. In 1860 they were crossed and recrossed many times A similar change had taken place in the south east. The 1860 map marks the condition at the breaking out of the Civil War.—In 1870 there does not appear to have been much change except in the north-west, and the completion of the first Pacific line, and yet there were 22,296 more miles than in 1860, nearly 700 miles more than the 1850–1860 growth, but being spread over a wider area it does not appear as clearly. A little careful study shows that many States had added considerably to their mileage.—The names in the maps are given mainly to mark terminal points.—While the map locates the mileage, the chart at the left accurately measures and compares it State by State.

Before turning to the 1880 map, let the eye go carefully over the 1870 lines, that the comparison may be the more properly made.

Railways in the United States. 1880

(From Scribner's Statistical Atlas.)

Railway Mileage by States, 1880.

RankStateMiles
47Mont.106»
46Ida.206»
45R.I.210»
44Del.275»»
43Wash.289»»
42I. T.289»»
41Ariz.349»»
40Oreg.508»»»
39Wyo.512»»»
38Fla.518»»»
37La.652»»»»
36W. Va.691»»»»
35Nev.739»»»»
34N.Mex.758»»»»
33Utah842»»»»»
32Ark.859»»»»»
31Vt.914»»»»»
30Conn.923»»»»»
29Me.1,005»»»»»»
28N.H.1,015»»»»»»2,000 Miles
27*Md.1,040»»»»»»
26Miss.1,127»»»»»»
25Dak.1,225»»»»»»
24S.C.1,427»»»»»»»
23N.C.1,486»»»»»»»
22Ky.1,530»»»»»»»
21Colo.1,570»»»»»»»
20N.J.1,684»»»»»»»»
19Tenn.1,843»»»»»»»»
18Ala.1,843»»»»»»»»
17Va.1,893»»»»»»»»»
16Mass.1,915»»»»»»»»»4,000
15Nebr.1,953»»»»»»»»»
14Cal.2,195»»»»»»»»»»
13Ga.2,459»»»»»»»»»»»
12Minn.3,151»»»»»»»»»»»»»
11Wis.3,155»»»»»»»»»»»»»
10Tex.3,244»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
9Kans.3,400»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
8Mich.3,938»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»6,000
7Mo.3,965»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
6Ind.4,373»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»8,000 
5Iowa5,400»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
4Ohio5,792»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»10,000
3N.Y.5,991»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
2Pa.6,191»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
1Ill. 7,851»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» 

* Includes District of Columbia.

It is difficult to believe that so many roads could have been added in ten years. All the 1870 area north of the Ohio River seems crowded at nearly every point, and the network of advance westward, in the States of Missouri, Iowa, Minnesota, Kansas, Nebraska, and Dakota, is equally surprising. The growth in Texas was also very large, and many new lines appear in other Southern States. The total increase of the ten years was over forty thousand miles (40,374).

It would not seem possible that this rate of building could be longer maintained, and yet the 1889 map shows a still greater growth. At the close of 1888 (only eight years), the increase was 62,785 miles.

Railways in the United States, 1889

(From the "Scribner-Black Atlas of the World.")

Railway Mileage by States,
Dec. 31, 1888.

R'kStatesMiles
  48D.C.21»
47R.I.214»»
46Del.315»»»
45Ida.868»»»»
44Wyo.902»»»»
43Nev.948»»»»»
42Vt.959»»»»»
41I. T.973»»»»»
40Conn.1,006»»»»»
39N.H.l,079»»»»»
38Ariz.1,095»»»»»
37Utah1,133»»»»»»
38Md.1,162»»»»»»
35W. Va.1,281»»»»»»»2,000 Miles
34Wash.1,319»»»»»»»
33Me.1,321»»»»»»»
32N.Mex.1,321»»»»»»»
31Oreg.1,412»»»»»»»
30La.1,505»»»»»»»
29Mont.1,804»»»»»»»»
28N.J.1,981»»»»»»»»»
27Ark.2,046»»»»»»»»»»
26Mass.2,074»»»»»»»»»»
25N.C.2,084»»»»»»»»»»
24Miss.2,218»»»»»»»»»»»
23Fla.2,250»»»»»»»»»»»
22Tenn.2,488»»»»»»»»»»»»4,000
21N.C.2,529»»»»»»»»»»»»
20Ky.2,585»»»»»»»»»»»»»
19Va.2,931»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
18Ala.2,986»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
17Ga.3,928»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
16Colo.4,038»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
15Cal.4,128»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
14Dak.4,465»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»6,000
13Nebr.4,980»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
12Wis.5,330»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
11Minn.5,375»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
10Ind.5,890»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
9Mo.5,901»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
8Mich.6,490»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»8,000
7N.Y.7,598»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
6Ohio7,636»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
5Tex.8,211»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»10,000
4Pa.8,225»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
3Iowa8,365»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
2Kans.8,755»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
1Ill. 9,901»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»

The figures in the two charts show that four States alone claim more than one-fourth of the growth (Kansas, 5,354; Texas, 4,967; Dakota, 8,240 and Nebraska, 3,207 miles; total, 16,768 miles.) Six other States (Iowa, Mich., Col., Minn., Wis., and Penn.) had each an increase of over 2,000 miles.—The charts give Illinois the longest line from 1870, but the position of Texas in the three charts seems to prophesy that Illinois must soon yield. In 1860, Ohio led; in 1850, New York, and in 1840, Pennsylvania.—The upper series of stars in the 1880 map locate the center of railway mileage. See page 427, preceding.