WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
The Attic theatre cover

The Attic theatre

Chapter 86: 4. Comic actors.
Open in WeRead

About This Book

A systematic study reconstructs the physical layout, machinery, and institutional framework of classical Athenian theatrical performances, assembling evidence from ancient authors, scholia, inscriptions, vase-painting, and archaeological remains. It examines festival contexts, the organization of dramatic contests, the design and arrangement of the theatre and stage, scenic practices, costumes, chorus and actors, and administrative roles involved in production. Arguments are rooted in primary evidence, and later revisions integrate recent excavations and inscriptional finds to revise chapters on theatre structure and scenery.

APPENDIX B

The Athenian inscriptions bearing upon the drama and dramatic contests are to be found, edited by Köhler, in the Corpus Inscriptionum Atticarum, ii. 2. pp. 394 ff., iv. 2. pp. 218 ff. Since their publication in this form much work has been done in reference to them by Wilhelm, Capps, and others. The following selection gives the most important inscriptions, with the conclusions which seem to be best warranted, omitting portions the restoration of which seems too uncertain to be useful.

The conjectural dates are inserted and conjectural supplements marked off by square brackets where the evidence is reasonably good: letters enclosed in round brackets simply expand the abbreviations contained in the inscription.

I. List of victors in the City Dionysia (C. I. A. ii. 971, iv. 971).

The fragments have been arranged on the hypothesis that they formed part of an inscription in 15 columns of 140 or 142 lines each: Columns 1, 2, 7-12 and 16 have been lost, as well as the greater part of the remainder. Capps conjectures that the inscription began in 502-501, and that this date was that of the beginning of choregia in tragedy and dithyramb (Capps, Introd. of Comedy into the City Dionysia, p. 29). The heading, of which at present only twelve letters remain (more widely spaced than the rest of the inscription), seems to have extended over the head of the first 6 columns, and probably ran (Capps, l.c., p. 29)—

[ἀπὸ ........... ἐφ’ οὗ πρῶτ]ον κῶμοι ἦσαν τῶ[ν ἐν ἄστει Διονυσίων οἵδε ἐνίκων].

We next have fragments of Cols. III, IV, V (971 a, f).

Col. III. Col. IV. Col. V.
B.C. 473-2 B.C. 460-59
Ξ]ενοκλείδης ἐχορήγε[ι Πανδιονὶ[ς ἀνδρῶν
Μ]άγνης ἐδίδασκεν. Κλεαίνετ[ος ἐχορήγει
τραγῳδῶν κωμῳδῶν
Περικλῆς Χολαρ(γεὺς) ἐχορή(γει) Θαρ[.. ἐχορήγει B.C. 447-6
Αἰσχύλος ἐδίδασκεν. ............ ...... 5
[ἐπὶ Χάρητος] (B.C. 472-1) [τραγῳδῶν] ......
............ ......... ἐχορή(γει) ......
............ ..... ἐδίδασκεν. Βίω[ν ἐχορήγει
............ ἐπὶ Φιλ]οκλεόυς (B.C. 459-8) κωμ[ῳδῶν
............ Οἰ]νηὶς παίδων, Ἀνδ[.... ἐχορήγει 10
............ Δημόδοκος ἐχορήγε[ι Καλ[λίας ἐδίδασκε
...... ἐχ]ορήγει Ἱπποθωντὶς ἀνδρῶν τρα[γῳδῶν
... ς ἐδίδ]ασκεν. Εὐκτήμων Ἐλευ(σίνιος) ἐχορή(γει) Θα[...... ἐχορήγει
[τραγῳδῶν] κωμῳδῶν Κα[ρκίνος ἐδίδασκεν
...... ἐχ]ορήγει Εὐρυκλείδης ἐχορήγει, ὑπ[οκριτὴς .... 15
Πολυφράσμω]ν ἐδίδασ(κεν). Εὐφρόνιος ἐδίδασκε. ἐπ[ὶ Καλλιμάχου (B.C. 446-5)
ἐπὶ Πραξιέργο]υ (B.C. 471-0) τραγῳδῶν,
Ἱπποθωντὶς πα]ίδων Ξενοκλῆς Ἀφιδαν(ῖος) ἐχορή(γει)
..... ἐχο]ρήγει Αἰσχύλος ἐδίδασκεν.
...... ων ἐπὶ Ἅβρωνος (B.C. 458-7) 20
... ἐχ]ορήγ[ει Ἐρεχθηὶς παίδων,
[κωμῳδῶν] ... Χαρίας Ἀγρυλῆ(θεν) ἐχορή[γει
... ἐχορήγ]ει Λεωντὶς ἀνδρῶν
Δεινόστρατος ἐχο[ρήγει
κωμῳδῶν 25
.... ἐχ]ορήγ[ει.

The next fragment (971 b) belongs to the years B.C. 423-1, and to Col. VII.

[κωμῳδῶν]
...... Παια[νιεὺς ἐχορήγει.
Ἕρμιππ]ος ἐδ[ίδασκε
τραγῳ]δῶν
... ω]ν Παιανιε[ὺς ἐχορή]γει,
Με]νεκράτης ἐδί[δασκεν
ὑπ]οκριτὴς Μυνν[ίσκος.
ἐ]πὶ Αλκαίου (B.C. 422-1)
Ἱπποθωντὶς παίδων
Ἀρίσταρχος Δεκε(λεεὺς) ἐχορή(γει)
Αἰαντὶς ἀνδρῶν,
Δημοσθένης ἐχορήγει.
κ]ωμῳδ[ῶν
..... ἐχορ]ήγ[ει

We next come to Col. XIII (fr. 971 g), B.C. 348-6.

[κωμῳδῶν]
..... [ἐχορήγει
Ἄ]λεξις ἐδ[ίδασκεν.
τραγῳδῶν
Κλ]εόμαχος Ἀχα[ρν(εὺς) ἐχορήγει,
Ἀ[σ]τυδάμ[α]ς ἐδ[ίδασκεν,
ὑ[πο]κριτὴς Θ[ετταλός.
ἐ]πὶ Θεμιστοκλέους (B.C. 347-6)
Ἐρεχθηὶς παίδων.
Διονυσ ....

The position of fr. 971 d is uncertain; Capps places it B.C. 344-3, Wilhelm, 336-5 B.C. It belongs in any case to the latter half of the fourth century.

Κεκροπ[ὶς παίδων
Διόφαν[τος ... ἐχορήγει
Κεκροπὶς [ἀνδρῶν
Ὀνήτωρ [ἐχορήγει
κωμῳδ[ῶν
Διοπείθ[ης .... ἐχορήγει
Προκλεί[δης ἐδίδασκεν
τραγῳδῶν

We next have two passages at the bottom of Cols. XIII, XIV (971 e), the years in the former being 343-1, and in the second 331-0.

Col. XIII. Col. XIV.
.........
l. 126 ......... ἐ]πὶ Ἀριστ[ο]φάνους (B.C. 331-0)
......... Οἰνηὶς παίδω[ν
[τραγῳδῶν] .... τος [Ἀχ]αρν[(εὺς) ἐχορή(γει)
..... ἐ]χορή(γει) Ἱπποθωντὶς ἀνδρ[ῶν
l. 130 .... ἐ]δίδ[ασ]κε ...... ος [Π]ει[ρ]αιε[ὺς ἐχορή(γει)
ὑποκριτὴς Ἀ]θηνόδωρος. κωμ]ῳδ[ῶν
ἐπὶ Σωσιγένους (B.C. 342-1) ...............
Αἰγηὶς παίδ]ων ...............
..... Δι]ομε[εὺς ἐχορ]ή(γει) τραγ]ῳ[δῶν
l. 135 Ἱπποθωντὶς] ἀνδρῶν
.... ἐκ Κοί]λης ἐχορή(γει)
[κωμῳδῶν]
........ ης [ἐχορήγει
...............
l. 140 [τραγῳδῶν]
........ ἐχ]ορ[ήγει
Ἀστυδάμας ἐδί]δ[ασκεν

Finally, from near the top of Cols. XIV, XV (971 h) we have fragments from 341-0 and 330-28 respectively. Col. XIV includes a fragment first printed by Wilhelm, op. cit., p. 27.

Col. XIV. Col. XV.
............ ... ς Κε[....
τρ]αγῳδῶν ἐ[χορήγ]ει
Ἀρρενείδης Παιανι(εὺς) ἐχο[ρήγει Θεόφιλος ἐδίδ[ασκεν]
Ἀστυδάμας ἐδίδα]σκεν τραγῳδῶν
ὑποκριτὴς Θεττα]λὸς Θ]ηραμένης Κηφισι[εὺς
Ἐ]πὶ Θεοφράστο[υ (B.C. 340-39) ἐχορ]ή[γει
[πα]λαιὸν δρᾶμ[α ..... .... κ]λης ἐδίδασ[κεν
π]αρεδίδαξα[ν οἱ] κ[ω]μ[ῳδοί ὑπο]κριτὴς
Ἀ]ντιοχὶς παί[δων .... Ἀθηνόδωρος
ἐπὶ Κηφισοφῶντος, (B.C. 329-8)
Ἱπποθωντὶς παί[δων

II. Record of Comic Contests at the Lenaea (C. I. A. ii. 972, Col. I).

The inscription of which this forms a part consists of two columns, the first containing records of comic contests, the second of tragic contests, at the Lenaea. The date of the contests recorded in the first column has been generally taken to be B.C. 354-2: but Capps (The Dating of some Didascalic Inscriptions, Amer. Journ. of Archaeology, 1900, pp. 74 ff.) has shown almost conclusively that the true date is B.C. 290-8 (it is possibly a year or two later, see Wilhelm, Urkunden dramatischer Aufführungen in Athen, p. 52, as the date of Diotimus’ archonship is not absolutely certain). This column must have contained the last records of comic contests at the Lenaea which came within the plan of this inscription, as the next column begins the records of tragic contests. It would appear, therefore, that the date of the transcribing of this series of didascaliae upon stone was in all probability circ. B.C. 287. Capps conjectures (with much reason) that C. I. A. ii. 972 formed part of one great didascalic inscription arranged in the order (1) Tragedy at the Dionysia, (2) Comedy at the Dionysia, (3) Comedy at the Lenaea, (4) Tragedy at the Lenaea. The extant fragments, therefore, mark the junction of parts (3) and (4). The original stone is now lost, and the record depends on the copies of Fourmont and Le Bas, the latter being apparently the more trustworthy.

..... τέ(ταρτος) ....]στίδι
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Ἀριστόμ]αχος.
.... ης πέμ(πτος) Ἀνασῳζο(μένοις),
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Ἀντ]ιφάνης.
ὑπο(κριτὴς) Ἱερ]ώνυμος ἐνίκα.
ἐπὶ Δι]οτίμου Σιμύλος (B.C. 289-8)
... σίᾳ ὑπε(κρίνετο) Ἀριστόμαχος.
Διόδωρος δεύ(τερος) Νεκρῷ
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Ἀριστόμαχος.
Διόδωρος τρί(τος) Μαινομένῳ
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Κηφίσιος.
Φο]ινικ[ίδ]ης τέ(ταρτος) Ποητεῖ
ὑπε(κρίνετο) .....]ης

III. Record of Tragic Contests at the Lenaea (C. I. A. ii. 972, Col. II).

The second column of the fragment to which the last quoted list belongs; Köhler has fixed the date beyond question.

Π]ειρ[ιθόῳ .....
ὑπε(κρίνετο) .....
ὑπο(κριτὴς) [.... ἐνίκα
ἐπὶ [Ἀστυφίλου ....... (B.C. 420-19)
Ἀγα[μέμνονι ......
ὑπ[ε(κρίνετο) ......
Ἡρα[κ ......
Θησ[εῖ, ......,
ὑπ[ε(κρίνετο) ...
ὑπο(κριτὴς) [..... ἐνίκα
ἐπὶ Ἀρχ[ίου ...... (B.C. 419-8)
Τυροῖ, Τ .........,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Λυσικράτ(ης).
Καλλίστρατος ......
Ἀμφιλόχῳ, Ἰξίονι
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Καλλιππί[δης
ὑπ]ο(κριτὴς) Καλλιππί[δης ἐνίκα
ἐπ Ἀ]ντ[ι]φ[ῶ]ντος Σ ..... (B.C. 418-7)
....... π ......

IV. Record of Tragic Contests at the City Dionysia (C. I. A. ii. 973).

παλαιᾷ.] Νε[οπτόλεμος
Ἰφιγε]νείᾳ Εὐ[ριπί]δο[υ
ποη(ταί)·] Ἀστυδάμας
Ἀχι]λλεῖ, ὑπε(κρίνετο) Θετταλός,
Ἀθάμαντι, ὑπε(κρίνετο) Νεοπτόλ[εμος,
Ἀν]τιγόνῃ, ὑπε(κρίνετο) Ἀθηνόδω[ρος.
Εὐ]άρετος [δεύ(τερος)] Τεύκρῳ,
ὑπ]ε(κρίνετο) Ἀθηνόδωρος·
Ἀχι]λ[λ]εῖ, [ὑπε(κρίνετο)] Θετταλός·
..... εῖ], ὑ[πε(κρίνετο) Νε]οπτόλεμος·
...... τ]ρί(τος) [Π]ελιάσιν,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Νεοπτ]όλεμος·
Ὀρέστη[ι, ὑπε(κρίνετο) Ἀθη]ν[όδωρος·
Αὔ[γῃ] ὑπε(κρίνετο) Θεττ[αλό]ς·
ὑπο(κριτὴς) Νεοπτόλεμος ἐνίκ[α.
ἐπὶ Νικομάχου· σατυρι(κῷ)· (B.C. 341-0)
Τιμοκλῆς Λυκούργῳ·
παλαιᾷ· Νεοπτόλεμ[ος
Ὀρέστῃ Εὐριπίδου·
π]οη(ταί)· Ἀστυδάμας
Παρθενοπαίῳ, ὑπε(κρίνετο) Θετ[ταλός·
Λυκά]ονι, ὑπε(κρίνετο) Νεοπτόλε[μος
...... οκλῆς δεύ(τερος) Φρίξῳ,
ὑπε(κρίνετο)] Θετταλός·
Οἰδί]ποδι, ὑπε(κρίνετο) Νεοπτόλ[εμος·
ὑπο(κριτὴς) Θε]τταλὸς ἐνίκα.
ἐπὶ Θεο]φράστου· σατυ[ρι(κῷ)· (B.C. 340-39)
..... Φορκίσ[ι.
παλαιᾷ .... ό]στρ[ατος
....... Εὐ]ριπί[δου.

V. Record of Comic Contests (festival uncertain).

This inscription (which he numbers 974 c) was found in 1901, and is published (with restorations) by Wilhelm, op. cit., pp. 43 ff.; it is a record of the years B.C. 313-11. Col. I only is printed below; the second column being too fragmentary.

ὑπε(κρίνετο) Ἀσκληπιόδ]ωρο[ς
Μένανδρος] πέμ(πτος) Ἡνιόχῳ
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Κάλ]λιππος πρεσβύτ(ερος)
ὑπο(κριτὴς) Κάλλι]ππος νεώ(τερος) ἐνίκ[α
ἐπὶ Πολέμ]ωνος παλαιᾷ (B.C. 312-11)
....... Θ]ησαυρῷ Ἀναξαν(δρίδου)
ποη(τὴς) Φιλιπ]πίδης Μύστιδι
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Ἀσκ]ληπιόδωρος
Νικόστ]ρατος δεύ(τερος)
.....]οσκόπῳ
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Κ]άλλιππος νεώτε(ρος)
Ἀμεινί]ας τρί(τος) Ἀπολειπούσει
οὗτος ἔ]φηβος ὢν ἐνεμήθη
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Ἀσκ]ληπιόδωρος
Θεόφιλο]ς (?) τέταρτος Παγκρατιασ(τῇ)
ὑπε(κρίνετο) ... ιπ]πος
........ πέμ(πτος) Π]αιδίῳ
[ὑπε(κρίνετο) ....]
ὑπο(κριτὴς) Ἀσκληπιόδωρο]ς ἐνίκ[α.

VI. Record of Comic Contests at the City Dionysia (C. I. A. ii. 975).

The inscription consists of a number of fragments. The date of those numbered a-e is tolerably certain; they range from about B.C. 190-160. The others, f-i, have been dated by Capps from about B.C. 308-260; but these dates and the restorations suggested by him are disputed by Wilhelm, who places the date of f, with a good deal of reason, only shortly before that of a, and also dates g-i (not included in the present selection) much later. The first part of fragment f is as follows:—

..... Ἐρχιεῦσιν
ὑπε(κρίνετο) ...]μος (Ἱερώνυμος Capps,
Νικόδημος Wilhelm.)
ἐπὶ ......] οὐκ ἐγένετο
...... π]αλαιᾷ
.......] Φωκεῦσι Φιλή(μονος)
ποη(ταὶ) ...] κράτης Ἀπε (Κράτης Ἀπελεύθεροις Capps,
Ἀριστοκράτης Ἀπε- Wilhelm.)
..... ὑ]πε(κρίνετο) Νικόδημος
...... Ἀ]νεψιοῖς.

Fragments a-e are arranged as forming an inscription in five columns by Köhler (C. I. A.) as follows:—

Col. I. Col. II. Col. III. Col. IV. Col. V.
1st col. of a 2nd col. of a
1st col. of b 2nd col. of b c d
1st col. of e 2nd col. of e

Wilhelm arranges them as follows, op. cit., pp. 68 ff.:—

Col. I. Col. II. Col. III. Col. IV.
1st col. of a 2nd col. of a
1st col. of b 2nd col. of b c d
1st col. of e 2nd col. of e

It is impossible at present to decide with certainty between the two arrangements. The former is here followed, but indications of Wilhelm’s arrangement are also given.

Col. I is too fragmentary to be intelligible. (It includes the 1st col. of a.)

Col. II (the 2nd col. of a).

Τιμ]όσ[τρατος] Λυτ[ρουμένῳ
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Διογείτων·
ὑπο(κριτὴς) Κράτης ἐνίκα
ἐπὶ Συμμάχου οὐκ ἐγ[ένετο (B.C. 188-7)
ἐπὶ Θεοξένου οὐκ [ἐγένετο (B.C. 187-6)
ἐπὶ Ζωπύρου· [παλαιᾷ· (B.C. 186-5)
Ἐράτων Με[γαρικῇ Σιμύλου (?)
ποη(ταὶ) Λαίν[ης ...
ὑπε(κρίνετο) .....

Then after an interval the 1st col. of b (Wilhelm makes this a continuation of Col. I of a, and accordingly dates it before the portion just given).

...... Ἐφήβοις
ὑπε(κρίνετο) .....]
ὑπο(κριτὴς) ..... ἐ]νίκα
ἐπὶ ...... οὐ]κ ἐγένετο
ἐπὶ ...... ο]υ· παλαιᾷ·
...... Μισογ]ύνει Μενάνδρου·
ποη(ταὶ) ....]νης Ἀδελφαῖς
ὑπε(κρίνετο) ....]ς
........ Δακτυλίῳ
ὑπε(κρίνετο) .....]ων
..... Φιλ]αθην[αίῳ.

Col. III (2nd col. of b; according to Wilhelm, a continuation of Col. II, i.e. of the 2nd col. of a).

ποη(ταὶ) Κρίτων Ἐφεσίοις,
ὑ]πε(κρίνετο) Σώφιλος·
Παράμονος Ναυαγῷ,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Ὀνήσιμος
Τιμόστρατος Φιλοικείῳ,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Καλλίστρατος·
Σωγένης Φιλοδεσπότῳ,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Ἑκαταῖος·
Φιλήμων νεώ(τερος) Μιλησίᾳ,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Κράτης.
ὑπο(κριτὴς) Ὀνήσιμος ἐνίκ[α·
ἐπὶ Ἑρμογένου οὐκ [ἐγέ]νετο. (B.C. 183-2)
ἐπὶ Τιμησιάν[ακτος· π]αλαιᾷ· (B.C. 182-1)
Φιλόστρατο[ς Ἀποκλε]ιομένει Ποσει(δίππου)·
ποη(ταὶ) [Ἀρχικλῆς (?) Ναυ]κλῆρῳ,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) ......
........ σ]ιν
[ὑπε(κρίνετο) .....]
...... Διαδικ]αζομένοις,
[ὑπε(κρίνετο) ......]
...... μ]ένοις
[ὑπε(κρίνετο) ......]
........ υ]μένῳ

Then an interval in which only a few letters are legible, the 1st col. of fragment e.

...... εὐ]εργετοῦντι
[ὑπε(κρίνετο) ......]
....... ἐξ]απατῶντι,
[ὑπε(κρίνετο) ......]
... ω]ν Συντ ....
ὑπε(κρίνετο) .....]ης
..... Συναγωνι ...
ὑπε(κρίνετο) ...]ίδης.
ὑπο(κριτὴς) ... ξέ]νος ἐνί[κα
ἐπὶ ... παλαι]ᾷ Προ ...

Col. IV (according to Wilhelm, Col. III), fragment c.

..... Μονοτ]ρόπῳ
.............
ποη(ταὶ) .... Ἀν]ασῳζομέ-
[νοις, ὑπε(κρίνετο) ...]
...... υμένῳ
ὑπε(κρίνετο) ....]ος
...... Ἀγνοοῦντι,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Κριτόδ]ημος
...... Νε]μέσει,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Σώ]νικος·
Παρά]μονος Χορηγοῦντι,
ὑπε(κρίνετο)] Μόνιμος
ὑπ]ο(κριτὴς) Κριτόδημος ἐνίκα.
ἐ]πὶ Εὐνίκου οὐκ ἐγένε[το. (B.C. 169-8)
ἐπὶ Ξενοκλέους· παλαι[ᾷ· (B.C. 168-7)
Μόνιμος Φάσματι Μεν[άνδρου.
ποη(ταί)· Παράμονος τεθνηκὼς ..... ις
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Δάμων·
Κρίτων Αἰτωλῷ,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Μόνιμος·
Βίοττος Ποητεῖ,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Δάμων·
Λάμπυτος ....
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Κα[βείριχος (?)
Ἐπικ[ράτης .....

Then after an interval 2nd col. of e.

ἐπὶ] Εὐερ[γ ..... οὐκ ἐγένετο (B.C. 164-3)
ἐ]πὶ Ἐράστο[υ οὐκ ἐγένετο (B.C. 163-2)
ἐπὶ Ποσει[δωνίου οὐκ ἐγένετο. (B.C. 162-1)
.........
ἐπὶ Ἀρισ[τόλα· παλαιᾷ (B.C. 161-0)
Ἡρακ[λε ....
πο[η(ταί) .....

Col. V (according to Wilhelm, Col. IV), fragment d.

ὑπε(κρίνετο) Καβεί]ριχος·
Ἐπ]ιγέ[ν]ης Λυτρουμένῳ
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Καβείριχος·
ὑπο(κριτὴς) Νικόλαος ἐνίκα·
ἐπὶ Ἀνθεστηρίου οὐκ ἐγένε[το. (soon after B.C. 160)
ἐπὶ Καλλιστράτου οὐκ ἐγένε[το.
ἐπὶ Μνησιθέου· παλαιᾷ·
Δάμων Φιλαθηναίῳ Φιλιππ[ίδου·
πο(ηταί)· Φιλοκλῆς Τραυματίᾳ,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Καλλικράτης·
Χαιρίων Αὑτοῦ καταψευδομέ[νῳ.
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Δάμων·
Βίοττος Ἀγνοοῦντι,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Δάμων·
Τιμόξενος Συνκρύπτον[τι,
ὑπε(κρίνετο) Καλλικράτης·
Ἀγαθοκλῆς Ὁμονοίᾳ,
ὑπεκρίνετο Νικόλ[αος.

VII. Lists of tragic and comic poets and actors, and the number of their victories (C. I. A. ii. 977, iv. 977).

This inscription was no doubt based on the Νῖκαι τραγικαὶ καὶ κωμικαί of Aristotle, and afterwards carried on by additions into the second century B.C.; the order of the names is that of the first victory of each poet or actor at the contest in question, and each column of the inscription contained seventeen names. There are over thirty fragments, and it is not always possible to say whether the lists given in them refer to the Lenaea or the City Dionysia. The following selection of the fragments is based on Capps’s paper on this inscription in the Amer. Journal of Philology, xx. pp. 388 ff.: and on the fuller study by Wilhelm, op. cit., pp. 89 ff.

1. Tragic poets.

(a) At the City Dionysia.

Fragment a.

Αἰ]σχύλ[ος ..
Εὐ]έτης Ι
Πο]λυφράσμ[ων ...
Νόθ]ιππος Ι
Σοφ]οκλῆς ΔΠΙΙΙ
..... τος ΙΙ
Ἀριστ]ίας

Fragment b.

..... ας ..
Καρκί]νος ΔΙ
Ἀστ]υδάμας Π[ΙΙ]Ι
Θεο]δέκτας ΠΙΙ
Ἀφαρ]εὺς ΙΙ
.... ν . Ι
.... ΙΙ
(b) Festival uncertain.

Fragment c.

...... ας Ι
.... δης Ι
..... ράτης Ι
Ἀστυδ]άμας ..
.... ΙΙ

2. Comic poets.

(a) At the City Dionysia.

Fragments i and k, together with two fragments first published by Wilhelm, l.c., p. 106, and arranged by him in three columns as follows:—

[ἀστικαὶ ποητῶν] Τηλεκλεί]δης ΙΙΙ Νικοφῶ[ν ...
[κωμικῶν] .......]ς Ι Θεόπομπ[ος
[Χιωνίδης ...] Κη]φισό[δοτος
...] ι [...
Φερ[εκράτης ..
]ς Ι Ἕρμ[ιππος ..
Ἀρι[στομένης ..
Μάγνη]ς ΔΙ Εὔ[πολις ...
...... ο]ς Ι Κα[λλίστρατος ..
Ἀλκιμέ]νη[ς] Ι Φρύ[νιχος ..
.....]ς Ι Ἀμ[ειψίας ..
Εὐφρόν]ιος Ι Πλά[των ...
Ἐκφαν]τίδης ΙΙΙΙ Φιλ[ωνίδης ..
Κρατῖ]νος ΠΙ Λύκ[ις
Διοπ]είθης ΙΙ Λεύ[κων
Κρά]της ΙΙΙ
Καλλία]ς ΙΙ

The following new fragment is published by Wilhelm, p. 118.

Πο]σείδιππος ΙΙΙΙ ....
Σατυρίων Ι Νίκαρχος Ι Πο ...
Ἀ]πολλόδωρος ΙΙ Νικόμαχος Ι Ὀ ...
Φιλ]ήμων ΠΙ Ἀριστοκράτης Ι ...
Δαμ]όξενος Ι Λαίνης ΙΙΙ
Φοινικ]ίδης ΙΙ Φιλήμω[ν

(b) At the Lenaea.

This list at present consists of fragments d-h, which have been arranged in four columns; one column must have preceded them in the original, and over the head of the lost column and the present first column the title of the list ran, of which only one or two traces remain. It probably (according to Capps) read thus:—οἵδε ἐνίκων τὰ Λήναια ποητῶν κωμικῶν (or τῶν κωμικῶν). The extant portions run as follows (including conjectural restorations; cf. Wilhelm, op. cit., p. 123). See addendum to p. 27, n. 1. According to Wilhelm the heading was Ληναικαὶ ποητῶν κωμικῶν.

I. II. III. IV.
Τὰ Λῆναι]α πο[ητῶν Πο ..... Ι Φίλιπ[πος ..] ΙΙ Θ ....
κωμι]κῶν Με[ταγέ]νης ΙΙ Χορη[γός .. Δι .... ος Ι
Ξ]ενόφιλος Ι Θεό[πομπ]ος ΙΙ Ἀναξα[νδρί]δης ΙΙΙ. Κλέα[ρχ]ος ..
Τ]ηλεκλείδης Π Πολ[ύζηλο]ς ΙΙΙΙ Φιλέτα[ιρο]ς ΙΙ Ἀθηνοκλῆς ..
5 Ἀριστομένης ΙΙ Νικοφ[ῶν .. Εὔβουλος ΙΙΙ Πῦρ[ων] Ι
Κρατῖνος ΙΙΙ Ἀπολ[λοφάν]ης Ι Ἔφιππος Ι Ἀλκ[ήν]ωρ Ι
Φερεκράτης ΙΙ Ἀμ[ειψίας Ἀ]ντιφάνη[ς ΠΙΙΙ Τιμοκλῆς Ι
Ἕρμιππος ΙΙΙΙ Νι[κοχάρης .. Μ]νησίμα[χος] Ι. ΙΙ Προκλείδης Ι
Φρύνιχος ΙΙ Ξεν[οφ]ῶν Ι Ναυσ[ικράτ]ης ΙΙΙ. Μ[έν]ανδρος Ι..
10 Μυρτίλος Ι Φιλύλλιος Ι Ευφάνη[ς .. Φ[ιλ]ήμων ΙΙΙ.
Εὔ]πολις ΙΙΙ Φιλόνικος Ι Ἄλεξις ΙΙ ... Ἀπολλόδωρο[ς ..
.....ς Ι Ἀρ]ιστο[φῶν .. Δίφιλος ΙΙΙ.
..... Φιλιππίδης ΙΙ
..... Νικόστρατος ..
..... Καλλιάδης Ι
..... Ἀμειν[ία]ς Ι
Κηφισόδω]ρος Ι. .....
(Διονυσόδωρος or
Ἀσκληπιόδωρος,
Wilhelm).

3. Tragic actors.

(a) At the City Dionysia.

Fragment e′.

ὑποκριτῶν τ[ραγικῶν ......
Ἡρακλεί[δης .. ......
Νικόμαχο[ς .. ......
Μυ[ν]νίσκος .. Ν ......
Σαώνδας ... Θε ......
Ανδ[ρων ΙΙ Α]σ ...
Χ]αι[ρ]έ[σ]τρατος Ι. Ἀθην[όδωρος
Μενεκ]ράτης .. Ἀρι[στόδημος ..
Λεπ]τίν[ης ...
(b) At the Lenaea.

Fragments o, z, x and b′, and two fragments published by Wilhelm, who puts all together as follows, op. cit., p. 144.

ὑποκριτῶν τραγικῶν Χαρίδημος .. . . . . . . . . . .
Χαιρέσ[τ]ρατος Ι Φίλιππος ... . . . . . Ε[
Με]ν[εκρά]της Ι Φύτιος ΙΙ ..... μ]ος ΙΙ Βάκχ[...
Λεπτίν]ης ΙΙΙ Εὐπόλεμο[ς ..... ]ς ΙΙ Στεμφ[ύλιος
. . . . . Θρασύβο[υλος] Ι Ἐ[......]ς Ι Ξένων Ι
Μυννίσκ]ος ΙΙ Ἀριστόδ[ημος] ΙΙ Ἀρ[ιστοφ]ῶν Ι Χαρίας [
Ἡρακλεί]δης Π Μίρων ΙΙ Πο ..... Ἀντιμέ[νης
Νικόστρα]τος ΙΙΙ Κλ]εο[δάμα]ς Ι Ν ...... Τεισίλα[ς
Θεόδωρος ΙΙΙ Ἀρχίας ... Γο[ργ ...
Ἵππαρχος ΠΙ Πραξία[ς .. Νίκων ΙΙ ..
Ἀμεινίας Ι Ἱερομν[ήμων] ΙΙΙ Ἀριστόνι[κος
Ἀν]δροσθένης Ι Φιλ[... Πύρριχος [..
Νεο]πτόλεμος Ι Νικ[... Ἀγήτωρ
Θεττα]λός ΙΙ Ἀρι[... Θηραμέν[ης
.....]ς ΙΙ . . . . . Κλεῖτος
Ἀριστ]ίων Ι
..... άδ]ης Ι

Fragment l (previously assigned to the list of poets; but see Wilhelm, op. cit., pp. 161, 253, who dates the fragment before B.C. 375).

Σάτ]υρος ΠΙ
Φι]λήμων ΙΙ
Κα]λλίστρατ[ος ..

4. Comic actors.

Fragments u, v (probably Lenaean, of the third century B.C.).

Ἀρισταγόρας Ι Πολυ[κλῆς ..
Κάλλιππος ΙΙΙΙ Λυκίσ[κος
Ἀ]σκληπιόδωρος Π Σωσικλ[ῆς.
Π]ολύευκτος Ι Πολύζηλ[ος
Π]υρραλεύς Ι Πυθάρατος Ι
Μ]οσχίων ΙΙ Καλλίας ΙΙΙ
.. μ ... ν ΙΙ Μενεκ[λῆ]ς Ι
Ἱ]ερώνυμος ΙΙΙΙ Δ[ημήτρ]ιος ΙΙ
Ἀ]ριστόμαχος ΙΙΙ Πιτθεύς Ι
Δέ]ρκετος Ι .. Ἡρακλείδης Ι[Ι.]
. . . . . . . . .
Φιλοκ[λῆς ... ρος ΙΙ
Ἀριστοκράτης Ι . . . .
Ἐμμενίδης Ι .... ΙΙ
Αὐτόλυκος Ι Δ[ημο]κράτης Ι
Φιλωνίδης Ι Φιλ[ο]στέφανος Ι
Σωκράτης Ι Ἑρμόφαντος Ι

There are a good many other fragments, containing in some cases (fragments f′, w, p, and possibly d′, g′) the names of comic actors, while in other cases the nature of the list and its place in the inscription is uncertain: but the above will serve as specimens.

VIII. The following inscriptions are also of interest:—

1. C. I. A. ii. 1289. (Wilhelm, op. cit., p. 209; Capps, Am. Journ. Arch. iv. p. 76.)

Ὁ δῆμος ἐ[χορήγει ἐπὶ Ἀναξι]κράτους ἄρχοντος· (B.C. 307-6)
ἀγωνοθέ[της Ξενοκλῆς Ξ]είνιδος Σφήττιος·
ποιητὴς τραγῳδοῖς ἐνίκα [Φανόστρατος] Ἡρακλείδου Ἁλικαρνασσεύς,
ὑποκριτὴς τραγῳδοῖς ἐνίκ[α .......]ν Εὐανορίδου Κυδαθηναιεύς,
ποιητὴς κωμῳδοῖς ἐνί[κα Φιλήμω]ν Δάμωνος Διομειεύς,
ὑποκριτὴς κ[ωμῳδοῖς ἐνίκα Κάλλιπ]πος Καλλίου Σουνιεύς.

2. Fragments (found in Rome) of a list of comic poets with their victories at each festival arranged according to the places they won (see Wilhelm, pp. 195 ff.).

(a) I. G. xiv. 1097.

ἐ]πὶ Ἀντιοχίδου Κύ[κλωψιν (?) ἐπὶ (B.C. 434)
......]ς κωμῳδίᾳ. δʹ ἐν ἄ[στει ἐπὶ
...... κω]μῳδίᾳ· ἐπὶ Τιμοκλέ[ους ... (B.C. 440)
.....] ἐπὶ Θεοδώρου Σατύροις [ἐπὶ .... (B.C. 437)
..... Ὑπ]έροις σιδηροῖς· ἐπὶ Πυ[θοδώρου ... (B.C. 431)
....]οις. εʹ ἐπὶ Ἀντιοχίδου [.... (B.C. 434)
Λ]ύσιππος ἐνίκα μὲν [ἐν ἄστει ἐπὶ
Γλαυκίπ]που } Καταχήναις [ἐπὶ .... (B.C. 409 or 410)
or Θεοπόμ]που }
....]αις· αὗται μόναι σῶ[αι·
.... ἐ]πὶ Διοφάντου Διονυ[σ ..... (B.C. 394)
γʹ ἐν ἄσ]τει ἐπὶ Νικοτέλους (B.C. 390)
δʹ ἐν ἄστ]ε[ι] ἐπὶ Λυσιμάχου [...... (B.C. 435)
εʹ ἐν ἄστε]ι ἐπὶ Μορυχίδου [.... ἐπὶ (B.C. 439)
....... ο]υς Κολεοφόροις

(b) All but the last two lines probably refer to the comic poet Anaxandrides, as the plays named show. I. G. xiv. 1098.

..... ἐπὶ Χιώνος Μαι[νομένῳ (?) (B.C. 364)
ἐπὶ Μόλωνος] Διονύσου γονα[ῖς, ἐπὶ (B.C. 361)
Νικοφήμου] Ἀμπρακιώτιδι· γʹ ἐν [ἄστει (B.C. 360)
ἐπὶ Φανο]στράτου Ἐρεχθεῖ, ἐ[πὶ .... (B.C. 382)
......]λεῖ, ἐπὶ Χαρισάνδρ[ου (B.C. 375)
.... ἐπὶ ἱπ]ποδάμαντος Ἰοῖ· ἐ[πὶ Φρασι- (B.C. 374, 370)
κλείδου] Ὀδυσσεῖ· ἐπὶ Κηφισοδ[ώρου (B.C. 365)
.....] ἐπὶ Ἀπολλοδώρου Ἀγ[ροίκοις (?) (B.C. 349)
......]ξίππου· Λήναια ἐπ[ὶ
..... π]οιῷ, ἐπὶ Ναυσιγένους [.... (B.C. 367)
...... δʹ ἐ]ν ἄστει· ἐπὶ Χίωνος [ (B.C. 364)
... εʹ ἐν ἄστ]ει ἐπὶ Ἀγαθοκλέ[ους (B.C. 356)
........ ἐ]πὶ Θουδήμου Ἀ[.... (B.C. 352)
]ου Ἀντέρωτι [......
...... ἐ]νίκα Λήναι[α ....
.... βʹ ἦν] ἐν ἄστ[ει ...