CHAPTER X
THE KALENDAR OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH
OF THE EAST
The modern Kalendar of the Byzantine Church is here dealt with. The early Menologies (which corresponded pretty closely to the Martyrologies of the West) show the usual phenomena of comparative simplicity passing into forms of great elaboration. The best known are the Menology of Constantinople of the eighth century and that which is known as the Basilianum, now most commonly associated with the Emperor Basil II (A.D. 976-1025), at whose instance it is said to have been composed[168].
The history of the growth and variations of the Kalendar of the Greeks cannot be here attempted; we confine ourselves to the Kalendar now in use.
I. Immoveable commemorations.
This Kalendar, or the Kalendar of Saints, begins on Sept. 1, the first day of the year of the Indiction. With us in the West the civil year has left no mark upon the services of the Church. In the Greek Church in the hymns the divine blessing is invoked on the new year; and two of the lessons at Vespers are chosen as bearing references applicable to the day.
The services of the Church have frequently several commemorations of various saints upon the same day; and this general statement may be illustrated from Sept. 1. In addition to the propria of the new year, we find commemorations of Simeon Stylites senior; his mother, St Martha; forty women martyrs with the Deacon Ammun; and a miraculous icon of St Mary. To these must be added a commemoration of the Old Testament worthy, Joshua, the son of Nun. This specimen will suffice to show that it would be impossible in the space at our disposal to exhibit the commemorations of every day in the year[169]. We shall confine ourselves to exhibiting the Greek classification of festivals, and marking the dates of some of the more eminent commemorations. But it must be observed that days that are not regarded as festivals frequently contain canons (metrical hymns) which commemorate saints or martyrs. Indeed the offices of the Eastern service-books are packed with an extraordinary abundance of hagiological reference and allusion.
As regards dignity and importance in the Greek Church, in addition to Easter, which stands pre-eminent and is known by way of distinction as ‘the Feast’ (ἡ ἑορτή), there are twelve festivals of the first rank, some of them being moveable. These are: (1) the Nativity of the Lord, Dec. 25; (2) the Theophany (Epiphany), Jan. 6; (3) Hypapante (Purification), Feb. 2; (4) the Annunciation of the Theotokos, March 25; (5) the festival of Palms, which with the Sabbath of Lazarus on the preceding day makes one festival; (6) the Ascension of the Lord; (7) Pentecost; (8) the Transfiguration, Aug. 6; (9) the Repose of Theotokos, Aug. 15; (10) the Nativity of Theotokos, Sept. 8; (11) the Exaltation of the Cross, Sept. 14; (12) the Entrance of the Theotokos into the Temple (i.e. her presentation), Nov. 21.
Each of these is marked first by the day preceding (proheortia) partaking of a festive character, and secondly, by having an echo of the festival on certain following days, which are known as the apodosis of the feast; but the name is often applied to the final day of the observance. The apodosis, unlike the Western Octave, is in some cases shorter than a week and in some cases longer. Thus, the apodosis of the Nativity of the Virgin (Sept. 8) terminates on Sept. 12; while the apodosis of the Theophany (Jan. 6) ordinarily extends to Jan. 14.
Next in dignity are four festivals of high rank, though not having either proheortia or apodosis. They are: (1) the Circumcision, Jan. 1; (2) the Nativity of the Forerunner (St John Baptist), June 24; (3) St Peter and St Paul, the Koryphaeoi, June 29; (4) the Decollation of the Forerunner, Aug. 29.
The twelve of the first group and the four of the second may be taken as together corresponding in a measure to festivals of the first class in the Roman classification.
Similarly corresponding to feasts of the second class in the West is a group which is divided into greater and lesser. The greater feasts of this group are marked liturgically by the singing of a canon of the Virgin in addition to the canon proper to the feast. The lesser are marked by the singing in the service of what is known as Polyeleos, a name given to Psalms cxxxiv, cxxxv (Pss. cxxxv, cxxxvi in the enumeration of the English Prayer Book).
The greater feasts of the middle class are: (1) the common festival of the three Doctors of the Church [Chrysostom, Basil, Gregory Nazianzen], Jan. 30; (2) St George, martyr, April 23; (3) St John the Evangelist, May 8; (4) the Translation of the image of Christ, made without hands, from Edessa, Aug. 16; (5) the Migration of St John the Evangelist, Sept. 26. This festival is based on the ancient legend that St John did not die, but was translated; (6) St Sabbas, the Sanctified [Abbot of Palestine, who died A.D. 531], Dec. 5; (7) St Nicholas of Myra, the wonder-worker, Dec. 6.
The lesser feasts of the middle class include: (1) St Anthony, hermit, Jan. 17; (2) the forty Martyrs [of Sebaste, under Licinius], March 9; (3) St Constantine and St Helena, May 21; (4) St Cosmas and St Damian, the unmercenary physicians, July 1; (5) St Elias, the prophet, July 20; (6) St Demetrius, Great Martyr [of Thessalonica, under Diocletian], Oct. 26; (7) Synaxis of the Archangel, St Michael, Nov. 8; (8) St Andrew the Apostle, Nov. 30.
There is a third class subdivided into (a) festivals with the great doxology, and (b) festivals without the great doxology[170]. Festivals of the third class are very numerous, but they are festivals rather of the service-books than of actual life, upon which they leave little or no impression. The number of festivals kept by the Greeks and observed either by a complete or a partial cessation from trade and servile labour far surpasses the festivals so observed in any of the countries of Western Christendom.
The Russian Kalendar corresponds largely to the Byzantine; but there are, as might be expected, not a few commemorations of persons, events, and of miraculous icons, peculiar to Russia.
A few explanatory observations may here be added: (1) The Eastern Kalendars contrast in a striking way with the Western in the prominence given to commemorations of the saints and heroes of the Old Testament. All the prophets and many of the righteous men of Hebrew history have their days. And the service-books contain a common of Prophets as well as a common of Apostles, etc.
(2) Honorary epithets are freely bestowed upon the various saints without any very precise significance. Thus ‘God-bearing’ (theophorus), which is a natural epithet in the case of Ignatius, as being used of himself in his writings, is bestowed on various distinguished ascetics, as Anthony, Euthymius, Sabbas, Onuphrius.
(3) The ground for the distinction between ‘Martyrs’ and ‘Great Martyrs’ is not apparent. ‘Hieromartyrs’ are martyrs who were bishops or priests; ‘Hosiomartyrs’ are martyrs who were living as religious. Thekla, as well as Stephen, is ‘Protomartyr.’
(4) The word ‘Apostle’ is not confined to the twelve. The seventy disciples whom the Lord sent forth are the ‘Seventy Apostles,’ among whom were reckoned many of the persons named in the salutations of St Paul’s Epistles. And the word is also applied to certain companions or acquaintances of St Paul, as e.g. Ananias of Damascus, Agabus, Titus, etc. ‘Equal to the Apostles’ (Isapostolos) is applied (a) to very early saints, e.g. Abercius of Hierapolis, Mary Magdalene, Junia, Thekla, etc.; and (b) to great princes who were distinguished for their services to the Church, as Constantine and Helena.
‘Wonder-worker’ (thaumaturgos) is used of various saints famous for their miracles, as e.g. Charilampes (Feb. 10), Spiridion (Dec. 12), Gregory, bishop of Neocaesarea in Pontus (Nov. 17), the Saint Elizabeth (April 24), of uncertain date, who never washed her body with water, and others.
John, son of Zacharias and Elizabeth, who with us is the Baptist, appears as the Precursor or Forerunner (Prodromos). He figures much in the services of the Church: and several days are dedicated to his honour; his Conception (Sept. 23), his Nativity (June 24), his Decollation (Aug. 29) and the great feast known as his Synaxis (Jan. 7). In addition, the first and second finding of his head is commemorated on Feb. 24, and the third finding of his head on May 25.
St Mary the Virgin is almost invariably the Theotokos, and Joachim and Anna are the Theopator and Theometor (Sept. 9).
The ‘unmercenary’ (anarguroi) saints are generally physicians who took no fees, as Cosmas and Damian, Cyrus and his companion John, and Pantaleon.
The term Synaxis in such phrases as the Synaxis of the Archangel Michael (Nov. 8), the Synaxis of the Theotokos (Dec. 26), the Synaxis of the seventy Apostles (Jan. 4), the Synaxis of the Forerunner (Jan. 7), the Synaxis of the Archangel Gabriel (March 26), the Synaxis of the twelve Apostles (June 30), is not easily rendered into English; and its precise significance (as used in the Kalendar) is not obvious. It is sometimes used for a gathering or assembly of people; but more commonly it is employed to signify a Eucharistic Communion[171].
It is customary after the great feasts of our Lord and of the Virgin Mary to subjoin on the following day the commemoration of saints associated with the event commemorated on the preceding day. Thus, the Epiphany (Theophany) in the Greek Church being chiefly concerned with the Baptism of Christ, we have on the following day (Jan. 7) the feast of St John Baptist; after the Hypapante, or meeting with Simeon and Anna in the Temple (on Feb. 2, the day of the Purification of the Virgin, in the West), we find (Feb. 3) Simeon and Anna the prophetess; after the Nativity of the Lord, the synaxis of the Theotokos, Dec. 26; after the Nativity of the Virgin (Sept. 8) we have on Sept. 9 Joachim and Anna, her parents; after the Annunciation (March 25) we have on March 26 the synaxis of the Archangel Gabriel, who made the great announcement.
It remains to be added that, as in the Orthodox Church of the East Wednesdays and Fridays are observed as strict fasts alike by the clergy, the monks, and the laity, most of the important festivals carry with them either a partial dispensation (as in some cases for the use of oil and wine, and in others for the use of oil, wine, and fish) or a dispensation for all kinds of food, when a festival falls on one of these fast days.
We now proceed to describe the annual cycle of Sundays.
II. The Dominical Kalendar of the Orthodox Church of the East.
The arrangement of the Sundays falls into two divisions, the first beginning with the Sunday before our Western Septuagesima; and the second, immediately after our Trinity Sunday, which, with the Greeks, is called the Sunday of All Saints. In the following table, opposite the names of the Sundays for the earlier part of the Dominical cycle, as given in the Greek service-books, are placed the names of the corresponding Sundays in the West, as known to English churchmen.
| Publican and Pharisee | Sunday before Septuagesima |
| The Prodigal Son | Septuagesima |
| Apocreos | Sexagesima |
| Tyrinis, or Tyrophagus | Quinquagesima |
| First of the Fasts (or Orthodoxy) | First Sunday in Lent |
| Second of the Fasts | Second Sunday in Lent |
| Third of the Fasts (or Adoration of the Cross) | Third Sunday in Lent |
| Fourth of the Fasts | Fourth Sunday in Lent |
| Fifth of the Fasts | Fifth Sunday in Lent |
| Palms | Sixth Sunday in Lent (Palm Sunday) |
| Holy Pasch | Easter |
| Antipasch (or St Thomas) | First Sunday after Easter |
| Myrrh-bearers | Second Sunday after Easter |
| Paralytic | Third Sunday after Easter |
| Samaritan Woman | Fourth Sunday after Easter |
| Blind Man | Fifth Sunday after Easter |
| The Three hundred and eighteen[172] | Sunday after Ascension-day |
| Pentecost | Whitsunday |
| First after Pentecost (or All Saints) | Trinity Sunday |
The following Sundays are numbered the Second, Third, Fourth after Pentecost, and so on, till we reach the Sunday of the Publican (the Sunday before Septuagesima) in the following year. But while the numbers are continuous, special names are given to certain Sundays. Thus we find the Sunday before and the Sunday after the Exaltation of the Cross (Sept. 14); the Sundays before and after the Nativity; the Sundays before and after the Lights (i.e. the Epiphany).
Again, we sometimes find the Sundays after Pentecost referred to as the First, Second, Third, etc., of Matthew; because the liturgical Gospel on these Sundays, on to the Exaltation of the Cross, is taken from St Matthew. Similarly, after the Exaltation of the Cross and on to Apocreos the liturgical Gospel for the Sundays is taken from St Luke, and the Sundays are named First, Second, Third, etc., of Luke.
It is the subject-matter of the Gospel for the day which gives its name to the Sundays called the Publican, the Prodigal, St Thomas, the Myrrh-bearers (i.e. the women bringing spices to the tomb), etc.
On the Sunday of Orthodoxy (the first in Lent) some sixty anathemas against heresy of various kinds are recited, including several against the Iconoclasts who were condemned at the second Council of Nicaea (A.D. 787). Tyrinis (or Tyrophagus) and Apocreos are explained elsewhere[173].
The name ‘Antipasch,’ for the first Sunday after Easter (Low Sunday; Dominica in Albis), implies that it is ‘over against’ or ‘answering to’ the Pasch. On the Sunday of the Three hundred and eighteen holy Fathers of Nicaea a canon (or metrical hymn) in honour of the Council is sung.
The naming of the week in relation to the Sunday is peculiar, and does not follow, as in the West, a consistent rule. In some cases, the week preceding a Sunday is given its name: in other cases the week is called after the Sunday with which it begins. And when the determination of dates is in view the student should be on the alert. Thus, the week of Apocreos (the last week of flesh-eating) precedes the Sunday Apocreos; the week of Tyrine (when cheese, butter and milk are allowed) precedes the Sunday of that name; and the first week of the Lenten fast precedes the Sunday that is the first in Lent. On the other hand, after Antipascha and on to the second Sunday after Pentecost the weeks are named from the Sunday which they follow: while the naming the week from the Sunday which follows is resumed at the latter date[174].
The period from the Sunday of the Publican to Easter Eve inclusive is sometimes called the time of the Triodion (Τριῴδιον), because the propria for that time are contained in a service-book which bears that name; while the period from Easter Day to the Sunday of All Saints (first Sunday after Pentecost), both inclusive, is called the time of the Pentekostarion (Πεντηκοστάριον) from the name of the service-book used at that time.
A few words must be said on certain week-days observed with special dignity, the position of which in the almanack varies with the position of Sundays as affected by the incidence of Easter. It will be remembered that in the East the Sabbath (Saturday) is reckoned as a day of special religious observance; and some Sabbaths are distinguished by special names. The Sabbath of Apocreos is a day for the solemn commemoration of all the faithful departed; and vigils are kept during the night. It is known as the Sabbath of the Dead. The next following Sabbath serves for the commemoration of religious and ascetics; it is named the Sabbath of Ascetics. On the Sabbath of the first week of Lent (known as the Sabbath of Kollyba) there is a commemoration of St Theodore Tyro, martyr, who, according to the legend, in the time of Julian the apostate, appeared to the bishop of Constantinople, and ordered him in a great emergency to make Kollyba and distribute them to the people. The bishop said in reply that he did not know what Kollyba were, and the saint explained that they were wheaten cakes. We need not pursue the story further. The Sabbath before the fifth Sunday in Lent is the Sabbath of the Akathist. A hymn, so called, in honour of the Virgin, was sung throughout the night by the people, not sitting down. The Sabbath before the Sixth Sunday commemorates the raising of Lazarus, and is called the Sabbath of Lazarus. Easter Eve is the ‘Great Sabbath.’
It may be observed that while in the West the word Parasceve is used exclusively for Good Friday, in the East the word is used for every Friday, and Good Friday is distinguished by the epithet Great.
A detailed exhibition of the Byzantine Kalendar cannot be attempted here, but the student will find it treated by J. M. Neale in the General Introduction to his History of the Holy Eastern Church (vol. II.) and with great fulness in Nilles’ Kalendarium manuale utriusque Ecclesiae.
Notes on the Kalendars of some of the separated Churches of the East will be found in Appendix III.
APPENDIX I
THE PASCHAL QUESTION IN THE CELTIC
CHURCHES
The controversies as to the calculation of Easter between the Roman ecclesiastics, on the one hand, and, on the other, the ecclesiastics of Ireland (Scotia), Scotland (Alban), and Wales, arose from the fact that our native Churches continued to follow a cycle which had, at the beginning of the fourth century, prevailed at Rome, but which was afterwards abandoned by the Church of that city. An admirable account of the matter will be found in Prof. Bury’s Life of St Patrick, 371-374. The improved Roman computation was eventually adopted in the south of Ireland about A.D. 650; in the north of Ireland in A.D. 703; among the Picts of Scotland in A.D. 710; at Iona in A.D. 716; and in South Wales in A.D. 802.
APPENDIX II
NOTE ON THE KALENDARS OF THE
SEPARATED CHURCHES OF THE EAST
I. The Armenians. The year is counted from the year 551 of our era, when the Catholicos, Moses II, who reformed the Kalendar, ascended the patriarchal throne. Thus A.D. 1910 is the year 1359 among the Armenians.
One noteworthy feature of the Armenian observance is that, with the exception of the Nativity (Jan. 6), the Circumcision, the Presentation of the Lord in the Temple, and the Annunciation, various important festivals are transferred to the following Sunday. Certain minor Holy Days, if they fall on Wednesday, Friday, or Sunday, are in some cases omitted, while others are transferred to the following Saturday. In regard to days of fasting, in addition to Lent, the most remarkable feature is ‘the fast of Nineveh,’ kept for two weeks, one month before the beginning of Lent. The days of the week following Pentecost are fast days (see p. 91 f.). For details see E. F. K. Fortescue’s Armenian Church, and Nilles, op. cit. (vol. II.).
II. The Eastern Syrian (Chaldean, Assyrian, Nestorian) Church. The Kalendar, Lectionary, and a list of days of Martyrs and others for which no special lessons are appointed will be found in Bishop A. J. Maclean’s East Syrian Daily Offices. One of the most interesting features is the frequency with which Friday is observed as a commemoration of saints; and sometimes the Friday commemoration is related in history or in thought with the event commemorated on the preceding Sunday or great festival. Thus St John Baptist is commemorated on the Friday after the Epiphany (Jan. 6), of which festival the baptism of the Lord is the dominant thought. The festival is popularly called at Urmi ‘The New waters.’ For details see Maclean.
III. The Coptic (Egyptian) and Abyssinian Churches, both Monophysite. The Copts compute their years according to ‘the era of the martyrs’ (of Diocletian), commencing A.D. 284. The year begins on the first of the month Tout, a day corresponding to Sept. 10. Each month consists of 30 days; and the five (or in leap-year six) days necessary to complete the solar year are called ‘the little month.’ There are fourteen principal feasts. The most peculiar features are commemorations of the Four-and-twenty Elders, and of the Four Beasts, of the Revelation.
The Ethiopic Kalendar runs on broadly similar lines; but it is a peculiar feature of this Kalendar that there are monthly celebrations of the Lord’s Nativity (except that the Lord’s Conception is substituted on March 25), as well as of St Mary, of St Michael, and of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Pontius Pilate is commemorated on June 25. See Neale’s Eastern Church (II. 805-815).
APPENDIX III
NOTE ON THE HISTORY OF THE KALENDAR
OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND SINCE THE
REFORMATION
As early as 1532 we find a Petition of the Commons (really emanating from the Court) to Henry VIII that, with the advice of his most honourable council, prelates, and ordinaries, holy days, ‘and specially such as fall in the harvest,’ may be ‘made fewer in number.’ To this the ordinaries answered, objecting to change, and, with reference to holy days in harvest, stating that ‘there be in August but St Lawrence, the Assumption of our Blessed Lady, St Bartholomew, and in September the Nativity of our Lady, the Exaltation of the Cross, and St Matthew the Apostle, before which days harvest is commonly ended[175].’ The reference both in the Petition and the answer is obviously to holy days carrying with them a cessation of labour.
In 1536 Convocation passed an ordinance abrogating superfluous holy days. It was ordained that in term time no holy days should be kept except Ascension Day, the Nativity of the Baptist, Allhallen, and Candlemas, nor in harvest except feasts of the Apostles and our Lady. St George was to continue to be celebrated. The feast of the patron of each church was to be abolished; and the feast of every church’s dedication was to be observed on the first Sunday in October. By this ordinance the great festival of St Thomas Becket, the translation of his relics (July 7), fell, as occurring in the season of harvest. Two years later by a royal proclamation the festival of his martyrdom (Dec. 29) met the same fate.
The Kalendar of the First Prayer Book of Edward VI (1549) exhibits a clean sweep of all festivals except the red-letter days still observed, together with ‘Magdalen’ (July 22), for which a collect, epistle, and gospel are supplied. St Matthias is placed at Feb. 24.
The Kalendar of the Second Prayer Book of Edward VI (1552) differs from that of the First Prayer Book, by omitting St Mary Magdalene and St Barnabas (June 11): but this latter would seem to have been omitted only per incuriam, as the collect, epistle, and gospel are found in the body of the book; and by the insertion of the following black-letter days, St George (April 23), Lammas (Aug. 1), St Lawrence (Aug. 10), St Clement (Nov. 23), together with Term days, ‘Dog days,’ ‘Equinoctium’ (March 10) and the days of the entrance of the sun into the several signs of the zodiac. It is an interesting problem how in the Prayer Book, which represents emphatically the action of the more thorough-going of the Protestant party, these black-letter days came to be inserted.
In the Prayer Book of 1559 ‘Barnabe Ap.’ reappears; the astronomical notes are somewhat fuller, and the hours of the rising and setting of the sun at certain dates are recorded.
As regards the black-letter days in the present Kalendar of the Church of England we have first to call attention to the Latin Prayer Book issued by the authority of Elizabeth in April 1560. It seems to have been ready for the press as early as Aug. 11, 1559. Its Kalendar is adorned with a great crowd of black-letter saints; and there are but few days blank. In 1561 appeared a new Kalendar in English, the work of Ecclesiastical Commissioners acting upon a royal letter. The Commissioners were directed to peruse the order of the lessons throughout the year, and to cause some new Kalendars to be imprinted, ‘whereby such chapters or parcels of less edification may be removed, and others more profitable may supply their rooms.’ As a matter of fact the Commissioners went beyond their instructions, and inserted in the Kalendar the names of black-letter saints almost as they were a century later approved by Convocation in 1661. These were inserted in the later issues of Elizabeth’s Prayer Book.
After the accession of James I the Birth-Day of Queen Elizabeth ceased to appear in the Kalendar at Sept. 7, and St Enurchus takes its place.
The only changes made in 1661 were the addition of Ven. Bede (May 27), St Alban (June 17), and the continuance of St Enurchus (Sept. 7), together with the shifting (probably through mistake) of St Mary Magdalene from July 22 to July 21.
With regard to the date of St Mary Magdalene a reference to the photo-zincographic facsimile of the Black-Letter Prayer Book, in which corrections were made at the last revision, will show at once how easily the scribe who copied from this book might make the mistake.
St Enurchus, who had appeared in this form of the name in the Prayer Book of 1604, and still earlier in the Kalendar of the Preces Privatae (which had been issued, as Regia authoritate approbatae, in 1564), is obviously a faulty form, arising from an error of transcription, for St Euurtius. The first letter u, after the initial E, was read as n (the confusion of u and n is one of the most frequent of the errors of copyists), and the ti (in a manner not surprising to those familiar with sixteenth century script) was apparently read as ch. It may be added that Bede and Alban had also appeared in the Kalendar of the Preces Privatae. We have stated that St Enurchus appears in the Kalendar of the Prayer Book of 1604, and it was introduced then as the only addition to the black-letter saints of the Kalendar of 1561. It is perhaps impossible to account for its introduction; but the conjecture has been offered that it was inserted to fill the gap caused by the omission of the Nativity of Queen Elizabeth which had formerly occupied Sept. 7[176].
The above are not the only errors of our present Kalendar. The revisers of 1661 added explanatory comments to the names of the saints, and in doing so have sometimes blundered. Thus they found ‘Cyprian’ at Sept. 26, and they added ‘Archbishop of Carthage and Martyr.’ If they had taken the trouble to look at the old Sarum or York Kalendars they would have seen that the Cyprian commemorated on this day was the converted magician of Antioch. This error is probably to be traced to Cosin’s Devotions (1627).
It must be confessed that the black-letter saints of the modern English Kalendar form by no means an ideal presentation of the worthies and heroes of the Church Catholic. The Bishop of Salisbury (J. Wordsworth) has some admirable remarks on the future reform of our English Kalendar in his Ministry of Grace (pp. 421-425).
Certain errors in the placing of the Golden Numbers in the Kalendar of the Prayer Book of 1662 for the month of January were soon discovered. They are noticed in Nicholl’s Commentary on the Book of Common Prayer (1712).
Among the red-letter days of 1662 were ‘King Charles. Martyr’ (Jan. 30), ‘King Charles II. Nativity and Restoration’ (May 29), ‘Papists’ Conspiracy’ (Nov. 5). These days have the authority of the Act of Uniformity of 1662, all of them appearing in the Book annexed to the Act. On the authority of a Royal Warrant (Jan. 17, 1859), the legal sufficiency of which has been questioned, these days have ceased to be entered in the Kalendars of modern Prayer Books.
It may be added that the Kalendar of the Scottish Prayer Book of 1637 (known commonly, though not correctly as ‘Archbishop Laud’s Prayer Book’) exhibited, in addition to the black-letter saints of the English Prayer Book of the day, the following national or local commemorations:—David, King, Jan. 11; Mungo, Bishop, Jan. 13; Colman, Feb. 18; Constantine III, King, March 11; Patrick, March 17; Cuthbert, March 20; Gilbert, Bishop, April 1; Serf, Bishop, April 20; Columba, June 9; Palladius, July 6; Ninian, Bishop, Sept. 18; Adaman (sic), Bishop (sic), Sept. 25; Margaret, Queen, Nov. 16; Ode, Virgin, Nov. 27; Drostan, Dec. 4.
The Kalendar of the Prayer Book of the Church of Ireland has since 1877 omitted all black-letter days. The same is true of the American Prayer Book since 1790.
FOOTNOTES
[1] Less costly works are Giry’s admirable Manuel de Diplomatique (1894), Sir Harris Nicholas’ Chronology of History, and Mr J. J. Bond’s Handy-Book of Rules and Tables for verifying dates.
[2] Acts xx. 7; 1 Cor. xvi. 2.
[3] The view that St John is here representing himself as rapt in vision to the time of judgment spoken of by St Paul (1 Cor. i. 8; 2 Thess. ii. 2) is the only other interpretation which deserves serious consideration. (For the view mentioned see Hort, Apocalypse, p. 15.) But it does not, as it seems to the present writer, dislodge the commonly accepted view.
[4] The Italian ‘Domenica’ and the French ‘Dimanche’ follow the language of the Latin Church in designating what we call ‘Sunday.’ In the Greek Church ‘the Lord’s Day’ is still the term employed.
[5] E.g. Epist. to Diognetus 4.
[6] Christian Worship, E. tr. 231.
[7] Expos. Fid. 24.
[8] See Maclean, Ancient Church Orders, p. 149 f.
[9] Ibid., p. 171 f.
[10] This last word (ἀφοριζέσθω) points to a temporary deprival of communion.
[11] H.E. v. 22.
[12] Epist. xxxvi. 2, ad Casulanum.
[13] Augustine, Ep. liv. 3, ad Bonifacium.
[14] Canon XXVI. ‘Errorem placuit corrigi, ut omni sabbati die superpositiones celebremus.’ On superpositio jejunii see D.C.A. It would seem that once a month (except in July and August, ob quorumdam infirmitatem) the added fast of Saturday was to be observed; Canon XXIII.
[15] Tertullian (de Jejuniis 2) speaks of ‘stations’ being held on the fourth and sixth feria.
[16] De Natura Rerum, c. 3.
[17] See the Notes of Valesius on Eusebius’ Martyrs of Palestine (Paris, 1659), pp. 173 f.
[18] Compare Luke xviii. 12.
[19] Simil. v. 1, στατίωνα ἔχω.
[20] De Jejuniis 14.
[21] Strom. vii. p. 877, Potter’s edit. On conjectures as to the origin of the word statio in this sense, see D.C.A.
[22] See p. 91.
[23] Christian Worship, E. tr. 230.
[24] Aegidius Bucherius (Gilles Boucher), a learned French Jesuit, whose De doctrina temporum appeared at Antwerp in 1634.
[25] Ruinart’s Acta Martyrum (1731), p. 541, and Lietzmann, Three oldest Martyrologies, 1904.
[26] It will be remembered that Felicitas and Perpetua are named in the Canon of the Roman Mass.
[27] Satornilos is presumably a transcriptional variant of Saturninus.
[28] Duchesne has assisted R. Graffin in editing this Martyrology in Acta Sanctorum Boll., Nov. II., under the title Breviarium Syriacum.
[29] See Mommsen, Corpus Inscript. Lat. I. 333.
[30] Lietzmann has printed the text in The Three Oldest Martyrologies. See also Ruinart, Acta Martyrum, pp. 541 f.
[31] [From the mention of Eugenius, bishop of Carthage († 505), Lietzmann concludes that the Kalendar received its present form shortly after the death of Eugenius. Edd.]
[32] Ministry of Grace, 65.
[33] See Hefele II. 400, English translation.
[34] Liturgia Romana Vetus, Muratori I. 38-40. See as to the date of the Sacramentary, Duchesne, Chr. Worship, E. tr. pp. 137-139. It has been edited by C. L. Feltoe (Sacramentarium Leonianum, Cambridge, 1896).
[35] [‘Georgii’ is a conjecture of Muratori. The MS. has ‘Gregorii.’ See Feltoe’s note, op. cit. p. 177. Edd.]
[36] [But Feltoe reads ‘iiii. n̅o̅n̅. a̅u̅g̅.,’ which corresponds with the ordinary date, Aug. 2. The actual prayers, however, in the Leonine Sacramentary refer to St Stephen the protomartyr, whose ‘Invention’ the Roman Kalendar still keeps on Aug. 3. See Feltoe, pp. 85 f., with notes. Edd.]
[37] Gregorius disappears from this day in the Gregorian Kalendar.
[38] See Muratori’s Liturg. Rom. Vet. I. 48-50.
[39] It will interest English students to know that the synod of Worcester, under Cantilupe, in A.D. 1240 appointed this day, with three others, St Margaret’s, St Lucy’s, and St Agatha’s, to be free from labour for women.
[40] Histoire du Bréviaire romain, p. 132.
[41] in Diem Natal. 1.
[42] Topograph. Christ. v. 194 (Migne, P. G. lxxxviii. 197).
[43] See the late Dr George Salmon’s masterly article ‘The Commentary of Hippolytus on Daniel’ in Hermathena, vol. VIII. 1893, and Bishop J. Wordsworth’s exposition in the Ministry of Grace, pp. 393-398.
[44] Ministry of Grace, 399.
[45] There are unfortunately some grave doubts as to the correct text of Sozomen, and as to the accuracy of his computation. See what is said by Ussher in his Dissertation de Macedonum et Asianorum anno solari, c. 2. Compare also Jerome’s Commentary on Ezekiel where the time of the prophet’s vision (thirtieth year, fourth month, fifth day, I. 1) is set forth as corresponding to the day of the Lord’s baptism and Epiphany. Jerome makes the fourth month ‘of the orientals’ correspond to the January of the Romans.
[46] This view (fanciful though it seems) should not be summarily dismissed; see Kellner, pp. 101-2.
[47] [According to Clement of Alexandria (Strom. i. 145, 146) the Basilidians kept Jan. 6 as the festival of the Baptism, and it was preceded by a Vigil. Edd.]
[48] It may interest the English student to be given a sketch of the principal features of the Sarum Breviary and Missal in relation to the subject of the festival. At Mattins the first three lessons are from Isaiah (lv. 1-5, 6-12; lx. 1-7), speaking of light, and the calling of the Gentiles. The versicle after the 1st lesson is ‘and the nations, shall walk in thy light, and kings in the brightness of thy rising.’ The response and versicle after the 2nd lesson touch on the gifts of gold and incense from Saba; ‘the kings of the Arabs and of Saba shall bring gifts’; and this note is sounded again and again. The 4th, 5th and 6th lessons are from a sermon of St Leo, and the responses and versicles relate to the visit of the Magi. In the response and versicle to the 7th lesson the baptism of Christ is recounted; and subsequently there are several references to the baptism. The collect is solely confined to the thought of the revelation of God’s only begotten Son to the Gentiles by the guiding of a star; and this is the dominant (though not exclusive) feature of the rest of the service. During the octave the baptism is given greater prominence; and on the octave itself the miracle at Cana has an important place, as well as the baptism. In the Missal the propers are confined to the revelation to the Gentiles and the visit of the Magi. But on the octave and the Sunday within the octave the baptism of Christ forms the leading thought.
[49] Duchesne, Chr. Worship, E. tr., 266 f., where certain variations in the Armenian and Nestorian Kalendars are exhibited.
[50] Possibly ‘the Baptist’ is a bungle of the transcriber.
[51] [On these commemorations of St James and St John see further C. L. Feltoe in J. Th. St. x. 589 f. Edd.]
[52] The Hieronymian Martyrology is a mechanical and unintelligent piecing together of Eastern and Western lists, to which African additions were made as late as A.D. 600. Its origin has been investigated by De Rossi and Duchesne, V. de Buck and Achelis: see Wordsworth’s Ministry of Grace, p. 66.
[53] Cathemerinon, Hymnus XII.
[54] De Corona, 3.
[55] Contra Celsum, VIII. 22.
[56] Les Vies des Saints (Paris, 1739), II. 4.
[57] Serm. 197, 198.
[58] This is so as regards the text printed by Muratori; but in Menard’s text there is a benediction that in its language is not unlike the collect in the Book of Common Prayer.
[59] De Eccl. Off. I. 40, 41.
[60] In Dom Cabrol’s Les Origines liturgiques (Appendice C.) will be found an interesting collection of liturgical passages illustrating the Church’s protest against idolatry on the Kalends of January.
[61] De Orat. 18.
[62] Concil. Carthag. III. c. 29.
[63] Ep. LIV. 7, ad Januarium. The well-known passage in Socrates (H.E. v. 22) seems to indicate that he believed that, excluding Alexandria, the Egyptians and the inhabitants of the Thebais ordinarily partook of the mysteries in the evening after a full meal.
[64] Spelman (Glossarium Archaeologicum, s.v.) derives our Maundy from maund, ‘a basket,’ because gifts for the poor were carried in baskets; and this derivation has attained some popularity. But there is little to support it. In Germany from the later mediaeval period Der grüne Donnerstag (Green Thursday) has been the popular name of the day. No entirely satisfactory explanation of the term has been offered. There is no question that in several German churches green vestments were worn by the priest and his ministers at the Mass of Maundy Thursday.
[65] Chr. Worship, E. tr., p. 248. See also Cabrol, Les Origines liturgiques, pp. 173 f.
[66] See Luke ix. 51.
[67] Epist. LIV. 1, ad Januarium.
[68] Ἡ ἁγία Μεταμόρφωσις.
[69] In 1892 the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America introduced into its Prayer Book the Transfiguration (Aug. 6) as a red-letter day with proper Lessons, Collect, Epistle, and Gospel.
[70] De Corona, 3.
[71] c. Celsum, VIII. 22.
[72] On the date of this Church Order, see Maclean, Ancient Church Orders, p. 163 f.
[73] See Wilson’s edit. 129-131.
[74] For details the student may consult Baillet, tom. IX. ii. 152-158.
[75] Twysden’s Decem. Scriptores, col. 1383.
[76] The date of this Council is sometimes placed as early as A.D. 656.
[77] [See esp. the Protevangelium Jacobi. Edd.]
[78] In the printed Sarum books the Assumption was a ‘principal double’; the Purification and Nativity ‘greater doubles’; and the Annunciation a ‘lesser double.’
[79] For these, and varieties as to the day of observance, see Grotefend, Zeitrechnung des deutsch. Mittelalters u. der Neuzeit.
[80] [See the Protevangelium (cc. 7, 8). Edd.]
[81] [See however Gasquet and Bishop, Bosworth Psalter, pp. 49 f. Edd.]
[82] [This legend also appears in the Protevangelium (cc. 1-5). Edd.]
[83] [Gasquet and Bishop, Bosworth Psalter, pp. 43 ff. Edd.]
[84] Summa, P. III. qu. 27, art. 2.
[85] Both these constitutions will be found in the Common Extravagants, lib. iii. tit. 12.
[86] See p. 135.
[87] [See the prayer in Feltoe’s edition, p. 46; ‘omnipotens sempiterne deus qui nos omnium apostolorum merita sub una tribuisti celebritate venerari.’ Edd.]
[88] Annales Cyprianici, sub anno 258.
[89] In the (so-called) Hieronymian Martyrology the entry at Jan. 18 runs ‘Dedicatio Cathedrae S. Petri Apostoli, quâ primo Romae sedit.’
[90] The student may consult the scholarly article of Dr Sinker on ‘Peter S., Festivals of’ in D.C.A., together with Duchesne’s Christian Worship, E. tr. (pp. 277-281), Wordsworth’s Ministry of Grace, and Kellner’s Heortology, pp. 301-308. It should be added however with regard to Kellner that the notion that the feast is connected with the Primacy, as distinguished from the Episcopacy of St Peter, seems to be devoid of evidence.
[91] D’Achery’s Spicilegium, tom. ii. 15.
[92] [It is found in the Carthaginian Kalendar, but not in the Bucherian, nor in that of Polemius Silvius. Edd.]
[93] Other festivals connected with St Andrew are noticed in D.C.A.
[94] Ministry of Grace, 419.
[95] See Duchesne, Chr. Worship, E. tr. 281.
[96] See Sinker’s article in D.C.A.
[97] For variations as to the day of observance see Baillet, and Sinker in D.C.A.
[98] Serm. 196, 287.
[99] [It is found in the Gelasian and in some forms of the Gregorian Sacramentary. Edd.]
[100] For other variations as to the day see Sinker’s article in D.C.A.
[101] Kellner, 313.
[102] See the Gelasian and Gregorian Sacramentaries.
[103] Heortology, p. 15.
[104] Ad Uxor. ii. 4.
[105] See for details of evidence Bingham, bk. xiii. c. 9.
[106] Epp. lib. v. 17.
[107] Ep. ad Laetam, 9.
[108] Comment. in Matth. XXV. 6.
[109] This letter is to be found in the Corpus Juris Canonici, Decretal. lib. iii. tit. 46.
[110] Muratori, Liturg. Rom. II. 786-790: 702-703.
[111] H.E. IV. 30: III. 27.
[112] See p. 110.
[113] Euseb. H.E. v. 24. The words as to the forty hours are not unattended with difficulty; but the interpretation given above is that adopted by the soundest scholars. See Duchesne (Christ. Worship, E. tr., p. 241), and the notes on the place by Valesius. The meaning is probably that no food was partaken for forty continuous hours.
[114] de Jejunio, 2, 13, 14.
[115] Dionysius of Alexandria, Ep. to Basilides, in Feltoe, Letters of Dionysius of Alex., p. 94 f.
[116] H.E. v. 22.
[117] The account in Socrates cannot be confidently regarded as strictly accurate in some of its details. We cannot readily accept the statement that the Saturdays at Rome were not fasting days.
[118] Collat. xxi. 25.
[119] Liturgia Romana Vetus (Muratori), II. 28, 29.
[120] Vita S. Margaritae, c. II. § 18.
[121] See pp. 143 f.
[122] The whole subject of the Lent of the Eastern Church is very fully dealt with by Nilles in his Kalendarium Manuale and by Prince Maximilian of Saxony in his Praelectiones de Liturgiis Orientalibus, 1908.
[123] See pp. 77, 80 f.
[124] Another reading is pro populo.
[125] Paenitentiale, II. xiv. 1 (Haddon and Stubbs, Councils, III. 202).
[126] ‘In tribus quadragesimis anni et in dominica die et in feriis quartis et in sextis feriis conjuges continere se debent.’ Lib. xlvi. c. 11: Wasserschleben, Die Irische Kanonensammlung (ed. 1885), p. 187.
[127] The Great Litany on St Mark’s day at Rome was much earlier.
[128] See Serm. xix. 2; lxxx. 4.
[129] For the reasons for his ingenious conjecture see Christian Worship, E. tr. p. 223.
[130] See Sinker’s scholarly article ‘Ember Days’ in the Dictionary of Christian Antiquities, for many valuable details.
[131] The MS. is wanting for the part before April.
[132] Can. 8 (Labbe xi. 274). It is to be observed that in the Leofric Missal, of much earlier date, the Ember days are noted as falling in the first week of Lent; in the week of Pentecost; in the full week before the autumnal equinox; and in the full week before the Nativity.
[133] The study of the Martyrologies of Bede, Florus, Ado, and Usuard has been recently approached in the true scientific spirit by Dom Henri Quentin, of Solesmes. Manuscripts in the various libraries of Europe have been examined and classified, and the sources of the entries traced in most cases with great success. See this writer’s Les Martyrologes historiques du moyen age (1908).
[134] Med. Æv. Kal. I. 397-420.
[135] [On these terms see Ducange, Glossarium, s.v. Festum; Addis and Arnold, Catholic Dictionary, art. ‘Festival.’ Edd.]
[136] The classification of festivals in the Kalendars of Germany with Tyrol, Holland, Denmark, and Scandinavia, as printed by Grotefend, varies much. We find such terms as ‘Triplex’ as well as ‘Duplex’ (Breslau); ‘Duplex compositum’ (Utrecht); ‘ix Psalmorum’ (Metz); ‘Bini’ (i.e. bini chori) at Salzburg; ‘Festa Prelatorum,’ ‘Festa Canonicorum,’ ‘Festa vicariorum’ (Roskilde); ‘Summum’ and ‘semi-summum’ (Erfurt), and many forms that are unfamiliar to English students.
[137] For further observations on the Kalendars of the Church of England and of Churches in communion with it see Appendix III.
[138] See Quentin’s Les Martyrologes historiques, pp. 27, 28.
[139] For details see Baillet, Les Vies des Saints, tom. I, in his Discours, pp. xxxiii.-xxxix.
[140] In the recently discovered Testament of the Lord, the word ‘Pascha’ is used for the season preceding Easter, even as ‘Pentecost’ is used for the season of fifty days preceding Whitsunday.
[141] Gute Freitag is found occasionally in the German Church Orders of the Reformation Period.
[142] In Greek writers τεσσαρεσκαιδεκατῖται. [For a full discussion of the whole question, with reference to the authorities, see V. H. Stanton, The Gospels as Historical Documents, Part I., pp. 173-197. Edd.]
[143] See Eusebius, H.E. v. 24, where the full context scarcely leaves a doubt that παρεχώρησεν τὴν εὐχαριστίαν must be understood in the sense that Anicetus yielded the place of celebrant to Polycarp.
[144] H.E. v. 24.
[145] We do not enter upon the discussion of the question whether he actually proceeded to the length of a formal excommunication. In certain of his letters he undoubtedly spoke of them as ἀκοινωνήτους. Euseb. H.E. v. 24.
[146] Ibid.
[147] See the discussion by Bp Maclean, Ancient Church Orders (in the present series), p. 149 f.
[148] Lib. V. c. 7.
[149] See p. 117.
[150] See p. 118 f.
[151] H.E. VI. 22.
[152] Lagarde, Analecta Syriaca, p. 89.
[153] See Dr George Salmon’s article on ‘Hippolytus Romanus’ in Smith and Wace’s Dictionary of Christian Biography.
[154] See Ludwig Ideler, Handbuch der mathematischen u. techn. Chronologie, II. 219.
[155] See for a full treatment of the subject Ideler, II. 226-231.
[156] H.E. I. 9.
[157] In the opinion of Duchesne the controversy dealt with in A.D. 325 was between the system of Antioch, which celebrated Easter on the Sunday next after the Jewish Pascha, and the system of Alexandria, which insisted on Easter being always after the vernal equinox. See Christian Worship, E. tr., 237.
[158] Eusebius, Vita Const. III. 18: Socrates H.E. I. 9.
[159] In French there is a trace of the more extended meaning in the phrase ‘quinzaine de Pâques,’ meaning ‘Holy week and Easter week.’ In Scotland and the north of England gifts of ‘pasch eggs’ (pronounced ‘paise eggs’), hard-boiled eggs stained with various colours, at Easter are still not unknown.
[160] Hefele, Councils, E. tr. II. 67.
[161] For the history of the paschal controversies in the time of Pope Leo see Bruno Krusch, Studien zur christlich-mittelalterlichen Chronologie. Der 84 jährige Ostercyclus und seine Quellen (Leipzig, 1880).
[162] See Appendix I.
[163] See Bruno Krusch, Studien, p. 32 f.
[164] The student who desires further details of the history of the controversies about the date of Easter, prior to the time of Dionysius Exiguus, may consult with profit the dissertation of Adrian Baillet in the ninth volume of his Les Vies des Saints (ed. 1739).
[165] The author died before his work was presented to the Pope, a duty performed by his brother Antonio Lilio, who was also a physician. Now and then we find the Gregorian Kalendar spoken of as the Lilian Kalendar.
[166] See Seabury, The theory and use of the Church Calendar in measurement and distribution of time, p. 120. Other devices of the astronomers which would reduce the error to only one day in a thousand centuries are noticed in the same work.
[167] Sir Harris Nicholas, Chronology of History, pp. 32-34; Giry, Manuel de Diplomatique, pp. 165-167.
[168] Notices of these Menologies will be found in Kellner’s Heortology, 387-393: and on both the Menology and the Menaea (in twelve volumes, corresponding to the months from September to August) see the Dissertation de libris et officiis ecclesiasticis Graecorum appended to Cave’s Historia Literaria.
[169] Nilles’ Kalendarium Manuale, tom I., and Prince Maximilian’s Praelectiones, pp. 122-221, may be consulted by the curious.
[170] The great doxology corresponds substantially to Gloria in excelsis; and the little doxology to Gloria Patri, etc.
[171] See Suicer’s Thesaurus, s.v.
[172] The 318 bishops at Nicaea in A.D. 325.
[173] p. 84.
[174] See Neale’s Holy Eastern Church, II. pp. 743, 749, 753.
[175] See Gee and Hardy, Documents illustrative of the history of the Church of England, pp. 150, 173.
[176] See V. Staley’s The Liturgical Year, where the Kalendar of the Church of England is treated with much fulness.