WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
The Dakotan Languages, and Their Relations to Other Languages cover

The Dakotan Languages, and Their Relations to Other Languages

Chapter 10: FOOTNOTES:
Open in WeRead

About This Book

The author surveys the Dakotan dialects and their relatives, proposing a classification into dialect groups and related languages, and compares lexical and structural evidence to assess affinities. He describes characteristic grammatical features such as a set of pronominal prefixes, a series of verb-forming prefixes, and a reflexive possessive construction, and contrasts analytic tendencies in Dakota with more synthetic structures in neighboring tongues. Vocabulary comparisons and limited data constrain conclusions, so evidence is weighed cautiously. Ethnographic and archaeological observations on population, subsistence, pottery, and house types are used to contextualize linguistic relationships.

FOOTNOTES:

[J] A word of this kind used every day by the masses of all Teutonic people, and corresponding to the principal languages in such a variety of meanings, could not possibly be derived from the Latin finitum. Our fine may be in part from finitum, but fin—I E pin is certainly a Teut word.

[K] Words varied by inflection are classed as different words.

[L] Except that in accordance with euphonic laws initial k becomes ch sixteen times, and final a e seven times.

Transcriber's Note: Inconsistencies in the punctuation around abbreviations have been retained.