WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
The early English cotton industry cover

The early English cotton industry

Chapter 30: INDEX
Open in WeRead

About This Book

The book traces the origins and growth of cotton manufacture in England from early imports and domestic textile traditions through the transition from domestic putting-out systems to factory production. It examines economic and institutional factors—guild and merchant-company constraints, capital and credit flows, and regional conditions in Lancashire—that shaped industrial change, using business records and unpublished letters of Samuel Crompton to illuminate practice and innovation. Chapters combine broad narrative of technological, social, and commercial developments with documentary excerpts and an introductory essay on industrial organization, ending with detailed case material illustrating the move toward mechanized and capital-intensive production.

INDEX

  • A
  • Abram, History of Blackburn, 97n.
  • Acts of Parliament, 1495-1496—indicates import of fustians, 196;
  • 1514—regulates making of cloth, 2, 3 and n.;
  • 1535—regulates making of cloth, 3;
  • 1543—gives information of Lancashire cloth industry, 30-31;
  • 1551—regulates cloth making and fixes standards, 3, 5n., 6;
  • 1552-1553—imposes restrictions on middlemen in wool trade, 31;
  • 1555—Weavers’ Act, main aim and provisions, 3-4;
  • counties excluded from operation, 4 and n.;
  • repeal of, 4n.;
  • 1557—modifies Weavers’ Act, 4;
  • 1563—Statute of Apprentices, scope of, 48n.;
  • appealed to by check-weavers (1758), 48 and n.;
  • repeal advocated, 51;
  • repealed, 1813-1814, 49n.;
  • 1566—appoints deputy-aulnagers for Lancashire towns, 4, 5n.;
  • 1577—restrictive character and effects, 31;
  • 1597—prohibits use of tenters and enforces regulations of size and weight of cloth, 5;
  • indicates English manufacture of fustians, 196;
  • 1606—distinguishes between cloths made of perfect wool and cloths in which flocks, etc., entered, 6-7;
  • ordains alnage of narrow draperies, 195-196;
  • 1700—abolishes previous duties, 7;
  • prohibits import and sale of printed or dyed calicoes from East, 19;
  • failure of, 20;
  • 1702—against payment in truck and embezzlement of materials, 36;
  • made permanent in 1710, 37;
  • extended to other industries, 37;
  • included provisions against combinations, 37;
  • indicates organisation of cotton industry, 37;
  • 1714—calicoes subjected to additional duty, 92-93;
  • 1721—prohibits use of printed or dyed calicoes, 20-22;
  • cloths exempted from operation of, 21;
  • stimulates printing of other fabrics than calico, 22;
  • explained by Manchester Act (1736), 23;
  • 1736—Manchester Act, scope of, 23;
  • support and opposition to, 24;
  • indicates expansion of fustian industry, 39;
  • modified Act of 1721 respecting goods made with linen warp, 93;
  • 1749—Act of 1702 against unlawful combinations extended, 37;
  • 1774—repealed additional duty on calicoes (1714) and prohibition of printed calicoes (1736), 93;
  • 1783—gave bounties on export of printed cottons, 197n.
  • Agriculture, many labourers from, become weavers, 144
  • Aikin, Description of Country round Manchester, 25, 26, 28, 59, 60, 62, 121n., 136n., 138, 139n., 161n.;
  • England Delineated, 58n.;
  • England Described, 58n.
  • Ainsworth, P., & Son, 170
  • Ainsworth, R., bleacher, supported Crompton’s appeal to Parliament, 167, 182
  • Ainsworth, T., supported Crompton’s appeal to Parliament, 167, 177, 178;
  • evidence in support of Crompton’s appeal, 178, 179-182, 183, 184, 189-191
  • Ainsworth, T., & Co., 170
  • America. See Wars, Cotton
  • Antwerp, cloth market, xxv.
  • Arkwright, Richard, first patent (1769) for roller-spinning, 1, 29, 76, 79, 80, 97, 100, 114, 122n., 172, 179, 186;
  • improved upon earlier carding-machines, 77-78;
  • inventor of crank and comb device, 78, 107;
  • second patent (1775) for carding-machine, 81, 100, 106-107;
  • brought roller-spinning and machine-carding into use, 111-112;
  • his machines produced hard thread suitable for warps, 117, 124;
  • his indebtedness to previous inventors, 107, 108-111;
  • not inventor of roller-spinning or roving-machine, 110;
  • application of steam-power to his machines, 81;
  • his profits from patent machinery, 100, 172, 179, 186;
  • erected factory at Cromford, 81, 100;
  • other factories, 100, 112;
  • capital invested in his and partners’ factories, 100;
  • concerned in erection of New Lanark Mills, 106, 112;
  • alleged to have aimed at cotton monopoly, 112;
  • alleged intention of discovering Crompton’s secret, 116n.;
  • secured modification of Acts of 1714 and 1721, 43, 93, 100;
  • left Lancashire, 82, 98;
  • his machinery destroyed, 82-88;
  • antagonism to, 89, 92, 93, 100, 101, 102, 103, 119, 120;
  • began actions for infringements of patents, 93, 100, 101, 102, 120;
  • first trial and unfavourable verdict, 1781, 102, 119;
  • second patent cancelled, 102, 110, 119, 121, 124, 144;
  • successful action of 1785, 103-105, 119, 121;
  • agitation to reverse verdict of second trial (1785), 105;
  • third trial (1785) of validity of second patent, 106-109, 119;
  • discussion of his machinery in third trial, 106-110;
  • character of, 111, 118;
  • as successful man of business, 97-98, 112, 118;
  • Case of (1782), 102;
  • Patent Trial of, 92n., 100n., 102n., 107n., 108n., 109n., 111n.
  • Arkwright, son of Richard A., subscribed to public subscription for Crompton, 185
  • Artisans, superior, called small farmers by Radcliffe, 142;
  • superior, rent land as accessory to industry, 139-140, 142;
  • abandon agriculture for work at loom, 141;
  • benefit from inventions, 140;
  • inferior, entirely dependent on industry, 139-140;
  • raised in social status by new industry, 140-141
  • Arts, Society of, inability to assist Crompton, 153
  • Ashley, W. J., Sir, Economic History, 4n.;
  • Economic Organisation of England, 37
  • Ashton, smallware weavers’ combine at, 144
  • Ashworth, H., cotton-spinner and author, 161
  • Augsburg, fustians of, xxii.
  • Aulnager, seal of counterfeited, 4;
  • deputy-aulnagers appointed, 4. See Lennox
  • Axon, W. E. A., Manchester a Hundred Years Ago, 26
  • B
  • Baines, History of Cotton Manufacture, xxi., 2n., 3n., 12, 16n., 22n., 24n., 29n., 31n., 63n., 77n., 78n., 93-94, 97, 98n., 107, 110, 111n., 112, 117n., 124n., 125n., 130n., 132n.;
  • Lancashire and Cheshire, 125n.
  • Baker, improved and enlarged mule, 123
  • Banks, Manchester Man, 127
  • Barkstead, J., connected with silk and copper industries, 16-17, 18n.;
  • applied for patent, for silk manufacture and calicoes, 17, 18;
  • had no influence on development of cotton industry, 18, 19
  • Barton, H. and J., & Co., 170
  • Bastable, Public Finance, 63n.
  • Bateman, J., 172
  • Bays, 6, 7n.
  • Belfast, numbers employed in 1800 in cotton industry at, 131
  • Belper, Arkwright’s factory at, 100
  • Bigwood, Cotton, 162n.
  • Billy, combination of mule and jenny for making rovings, 123-124, 181n.;
  • premium to inventor of, 123-124
  • Birkacre, Arkwright’s factory at, 100;
  • factories attacked, 82, 92
  • Birley, R., 170
  • Blackburn. See Petitions
  • Bolton, see Cottons, Fustians, Petitions, Crompton;
  • market, 3, 27, 37;
  • sixteenth-century manufacture of cottons and coarse yarns, 3;
  • prosecution club, 159 and n.;
  • public subscription to relieve distress, 1862, 161;
  • population in 1773, 161;
  • centre of fine cotton spinning, 162;
  • centre of fustian manufacture, 15, 27, 56
  • Bourne, D., patented carding-machine, 77
  • Bridgewater cloth, 6
  • Bridgnorth, Society of Travelling Scotchmen of, 65
  • Bristol, food riots in, 42
  • Brown, J., took lead in second petition on Crompton’s behalf, 159;
  • Basis of Mr. Samuel Crompton’s Claims, 78n., 116n., 152n., 153n., 157n., 159n., 172n.
  • Brussels, gilds of journeymen at, xxiii.
  • Burleigh, Lord, xxvii.-xxviii.
  • Burnley, woollen manufacturers support Manchester Act (1736), 24
  • C
  • Calicoes, see Acts of Parliament;
  • plain imported, 19;
  • manufacture established by new machinery, 91-92, 128;
  • made in Arkwright’s factory at Derby, 100
  • Calico-printing, early development in London and Lancashire, 22n.
  • Camden, Britannia, 7n.
  • Canals, 62, 71
  • Cannan, see M‘Connel;
  • emigrated from Kirkcudbright and became cotton-machine maker, 127-128
  • Carding, see Arkwright, Bourne, Paul;
  • mechanical improvements in, 76-77, 110;
  • cylinder carding-engine, 110
  • Carriers displace pack-horses, 62. See Manchester
  • Case, G., 172
  • Champagne fairs, xxii.
  • Chapman, S. J., Sir, Lancashire Cotton Industry, 40n., 72n., 137n., 143n., 163n.;
  • Victoria County History of Lancashire, 5n., 8n.
  • Chapmen, see Travelling Merchants, 60, 61, 63-65
  • Checks, organisation of manufacture, 40-41;
  • articles included in, 25;
  • localisation of manufacture, 56;
  • check-weavers’ turn-out and submission, 46-52
  • Checks and smallware, Act of 1702 indicates organisation of manufacture, 37;
  • makers of, less numerous than fustian-makers, 39;
  • organisation in middle of eighteenth century, 40. See Combinations
  • Cheshire v. Lancashire. Spinning on Cheshire farms, 139n.;
  • Luddite risings, 154-155
  • Chester, petitioned to be sole port for Manchester cottons, 7n.;
  • food riots at, 86
  • Chetham, George, apprenticed to G. Tipping, 34;
  • member of Merchant Tailors’ Company, 34;
  • partnership with brother Humphrey, 34
  • Chetham, Humphrey, apprenticed to S. Tipping, 34;
  • general merchant and manufacturer, 35;
  • accounts of, 35;
  • dealer in cotton and linen yarn, 35;
  • employed spinners and weavers, 35-36;
  • a capitalist clothier, 36;
  • sold cotton and yarn in small quantities on credit, 36
  • Chetham, H. and G., business and capital of, xxiv.-xxv., 34;
  • branches in Manchester and London, 34, 59;
  • traded with Ireland, 59;
  • not merely fustian dealers, 35;
  • mainly engaged in home trade, 59;
  • invest capital in land, 34
  • Chetham, James, 34
  • Chethams, engaged in cloth industry, 32-34, 39
  • Children, labour of, in seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in Manchester, 25-26
  • Chorley, factories attacked, 82, 92
  • Chowbent, 127-128
  • Clarke, New Lancashire Gazetteer, 128n., 129n.
  • Clegg, A., 170
  • Clothiers, northern, of early sixteenth century, 30-32
  • Cloths, exports of, in 1594 and 1595, 7
  • Cole, Some Account of Lewis Paul, 76
  • Combination Acts expressed views of dominant political class, 146-147
  • Combinations, see Acts (1702, 1749), Mansfield (Lord);
  • coming into existence in early eighteenth century, 52;
  • link between earlier associations and trade unions, 52;
  • various trades organised before 1790, 54n.;
  • in west of England textile industry, 52 and n.;
  • in check and smallware trades, 40-45;
  • extended to country districts, 144;
  • among mule-spinners, 144n.
  • Communications, road and river, 62, 71
  • Companies formed in South Sea period to promote cotton manufacture, 19
  • Cotton, called cotton-wool, 8;
  • import of, early, 2, 16;
  • at end of seventeenth century, 16;
  • in eighteenth century, 24;
  • up to 1815, 132;
  • import of, from East, 8, 9, 13, 16;
  • from Africa, 16;
  • from America and West Indies, 16, 57, 132;
  • imported through London, 57;
  • previous sources displaced by United States, 16;
  • customs on imported cotton, 9;
  • early use of, for candle-wicks, 2;
  • first used in making cloth, 2;
  • made into fustians, vermilions, dymities, 8;
  • regular supply necessary to Lancashire in 1654, 13;
  • perhaps used in Lancashire for cloth-making in sixteenth century, 7;
  • cleaning and carding, early methods of, 75;
  • used as substitute for flax in lace-making, 131;
  • quantity spun by mules in 1812, 188
  • Cotton cloth, see Petitions;
  • imported before sixteenth century, 2 and n.;
  • pure, when manufactured, 29;
  • put on same footing as mixed goods, 93
  • Cottons, see Acts (1514, 1535, 1551), Manchester;
  • made in Lancashire in early sixteenth century, 2;
  • in Bolton district, 3;
  • and outside Lancashire, 7;
  • exported in sixteenth century, 3, 7;
  • manufacture regulated, 3-8;
  • faults in making of, 5;
  • regarded as species of woollen cloth, 7, 8;
  • manufacture introduced by immigrants, 12;
  • duties on, abolished, 7
  • Cotton industry, see Fustian, Germany, Lancashire, Manchester, Weymouth;
  • originated in second half of sixteenth century, 12;
  • established by 1621, 10;
  • difficulties during commonwealth, 13;
  • associated with fustian manufacture, 15;
  • comparatively unhampered by regulations, 66;
  • development of spinning and preparatory processes after 1736, 72, 76n.;
  • progressive expansion due to inventions, 145, 179, 189;
  • expansion after 1770, 1, 72, 91, 132;
  • organised on factory system after 1770, 1, 75n., 98-99, 100;
  • factories transferred from country to towns, 126;
  • description of, between 1770 and 1778, 133-134;
  • statistics of mule and ring spindles, 164;
  • organisation and methods changing in 1780, 24;
  • expansion by 1812, 179, 189-190;
  • assumed modern form in spinning branch, 132;
  • employment and capital in 1782, 100;
  • fear of removal to Ireland and Scotland, 106;
  • manufacture of fine fabrics transferred from East to West, 129 and n.;
  • development of fine cotton goods manufacture, 130-131;
  • finds extending market in East, 130 and n.;
  • use of steam-power in, 81-82;
  • domestic system in, 137n.;
  • association of industry with agriculture, 135-137;
  • labour supplied mainly from cottagers and small farmers, 139;
  • distinction and proportion between small farmers and cottagers engaged in, 137-139;
  • semi-independent producers in, 35-36, 134-135, 143 and n.;
  • but not typical workpeople, 36-37, 143;
  • part-time industrialists in country districts only, 137, 143 and n.;
  • classes affected by industrial changes, 139-143;
  • wages in, 90-91 and n., 133-134
  • Cotton yarn, imported from East, 8, 9, 16;
  • imported from other countries, 29n.;
  • imported from Continent for Scotch manufactory, 180
  • Crank and comb device. See Arkwright
  • Crofters in Manchester district, 70
  • Cromford, Arkwright’s factory at, 81, 100
  • Crompton, Samuel, birth and early life, 114;
  • character, 120-121;
  • lacked business qualities, 118, 150;
  • death in 1827, 159, 160;
  • inventor of mule, 113;
  • endeavoured to improve quality of yarn, 114, 167;
  • began to construct mule, 114, 167, 168-170;
  • completed and used mule, 114, 161, 167, 173;
  • gave up weaving and kept to spinning, 167;
  • made mule public, 116, 167, 168, 173;
  • reasons for not obtaining patent, 118;
  • agreed to subscription (1780) as reward for invention, 116 and n., 118, 120, 168-169, 181, 187;
  • received only £100 as reward in 1780, 120, 169, 187;
  • public subscription for, in 1802, 150, 166-167;
  • its poor result, 151, 169, 188;
  • Appeal to Parliament in 1812, 151, 153, 154, 155, 170;
  • his petition, 172-174;
  • memorial and signatures presented to Chancellor of Exchequer, 168-172;
  • committee on his petition, 129, 184-185;
  • minutes of evidence, 186-191;
  • proceedings in reference to his appeal, 155-157, 172-174;
  • his petition recommended by Prince Regent, 155, 172;
  • presented to Parliament, 172-173;
  • award of £5000 in 1812, 151, 155, 158;
  • reduced to poverty by 1824, 159;
  • annuity raised by friends in 1824, 159;
  • further petition in 1826, 159-160;
  • gratuity of £50 given to his son, 161;
  • combined business of small farmer with that of spinner, 149;
  • refused to join Peel’s business, 149;
  • difficulty of retaining his workers, 152 and n.;
  • embarked without success on bleaching business, 158;
  • continued business of spinning and manufacturing at Bolton, 158;
  • unsuccessful partnership as spinner and cotton merchant, 158;
  • his part in development of mule, 162, 165, 179;
  • his account of value of mule to cotton industry, 169-170, 173, 180;
  • effects of his work, 162;
  • unacquainted with Arkwright’s rollers, 121-122;
  • destroyed carding-machine on which he was experimenting, 121;
  • relations with members of his family, 152;
  • overseer of poor, 149;
  • member of Bolton prosecution club, 159n.;
  • monument and statue, 160;
  • Hall-i’-th’-Wood museum and memorial, 161 and n.;
  • correspondence of, to M‘Connel & Kennedy respecting subscription of 1803, 166-167;
  • to M‘Connel & Kennedy respecting proceedings in London, 174-175;
  • to M‘Connel & Kennedy, respecting proceedings after sittings of Committee, 192-194;
  • to Kennedy respecting petition proceedings, 175-176;
  • to family respecting petition proceedings, 176-178;
  • to Kennedy respecting evidence for appeal to Parliament, 178-179;
  • grant to family from Royal Bounty Fund, 197n.
  • Cumberland exempted from provisions of Weavers’ Act, 4
  • Cunningham, W., Growth of English Industry and Commerce, 12, 49n.
  • Curtler, Short History of Agriculture, 147n.
  • D
  • Dale, D., connected with Arkwright and New Lanark Mills, xxx., 106
  • Defoe, D., Tour through Great Britain, 61-62, 135n., 197n.
  • Dehn, German Cotton Industry, 14n.
  • Deptford, industries in eighteenth century and numbers employed, 28n.
  • Derbyshire, miners fix food prices (1764), 84;
  • food riots in 1767, 85;
  • Luddite risings, 154-155
  • Dictionary of National Biography, 47n.
  • Dimities, made from cotton-wool from Cyprus, 8
  • Distress in 1756-1757, 43;
  • Parliamentary measures to relieve, 84-85
  • Dobson, Evolution of Spinning Machine, 75n., 77n., 78n., 128n., 159n., 162n.
  • Dobson & Rothwell, makers of textile machinery, 128;
  • size of mules made by, in 1799, 162
  • Dodd, Textile Manufacturers of Great Britain, 131n.
  • Domestic system, a system of capitalist employers, 54-55.
  • See Cotton Industry
  • Douai, textile industry of, xxiv.-xxv.
  • Double jenny, 94-95
  • Douglas, W., & Co., 170
  • Dozens, northern, 6
  • Drapery, new, manufacture of, introduced by Flemings in 1561, 12;
  • character of, 11 and n.;
  • regulation of, 6
  • Draw-boys, 74
  • Drinkwater, T. and J., 172
  • Dunlop, J., 172
  • Dunster cotton, 7
  • Dutch loom, superseded single loom, 40;
  • widened scope of employment, 40;
  • for narrow fabrics, 72, 74;
  • disadvantages of, 72
  • E
  • Earle, T., 172
  • East India Co., imported cotton yarn and fine cotton fabrics in seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 16, 18;
  • rivals of, 18
  • Economic Journal, 5n., 31n., 126n., 132n., 150n.
  • Edwards, History of West Indies, 88n.
  • Ellison, Cotton Trade of Great Britain, 57n., 164n.
  • Embezzlement of materials by workpeople, 36.
  • See Acts (1702)
  • Enclosure Acts, expression of views of dominant political class, 146-147
  • Espinasse, Lancashire Worthies, 20, 29n., 73n., 74n., 76n., 77n., 78n., 80, 81, 82n., 93n., 100n., 102n., 103n., 104n., 105n., 106n., 107n., 110n.
  • Ewart, Rutson & Co., 172
  • F
  • Factory system, beginning of, 75n.
  • See Cotton Industry, Silk
  • Felkin, History of Machine-Wrought Hosiery and Lace Manufactures, 98
  • Fielden, H. and W., 170
  • Findlay, J., & Co., 172
  • Flanders, textile industries of, xxiv.-xxv.
  • Flier, used with Saxony wheel, 75, 81
  • Florence, textile industries of, xxiii., xxv.
  • Flying shuttle, invention and importance of, 73, 74;
  • see Kay;
  • slow adoption in cotton industry, 73
  • Food riots in 1753 and 1754, 42
  • Forster, J., 172
  • Fox, W., 172
  • French, Life and Times of Samuel Crompton, 17n., 76n., 77n., 113, 114, 116n., 118, 121, 134n., 138n., 149, 150, 151, 152n., 153n., 155, 157, 158n., 159n., 160
  • Fuller, Worthies of England, 15, 25, 34
  • Fustians, see Acts, Bolton, Combinations, Cotton Industry, London;
  • manufacture introduced into Europe, xxi.-xxii.;
  • into England, 12;
  • stimulated by decline of German cotton industry;
  • date of origin of fustian manufacture discussed, 12, 195-196;
  • development of fustian manufacture, 12, 15, 23, 39;
  • organisation of manufacture, 37-39;
  • combined with smallware manufacture, 27-28;
  • early large-scale production, 23;
  • numbers employed in 1654, 13;
  • and in 1735, 23;
  • commission system in fustian industry, 37-38;
  • country fustian masters, 39;
  • centres of manufacture, 9-10, 15, 27, 37, 56;
  • regulation of manufacture, 11, 195;
  • wages in fustian trade, 91n.;
  • materials used in manufacture, 29, 35;
  • regarded as woollens, 11;
  • not made of pure cottons in seventeenth century, 19, 22, 196;
  • a species of new drapery, 196;
  • range of goods comprised by, 28;
  • imported, 2n., 196;
  • exported, 9, 60;
  • fustian tax, agitation against and repeal, 63 and n., 103-104
  • G
  • Gaskell, Artisans and Machinery, 139n.;
  • Manufacturing Population of England, 56n., 137n., 139-144;
  • dislike of factory system, 139
  • Gentleman’s Magazine, 46n.
  • Germany, cotton industry in fourteenth century, 13-14;
  • effects of Thirty Years’ War on, 14;
  • effects of decline in English fustian industry, 13-14
  • Ghent, textile workers of, xxiii.
  • Gilds, textile, xxii.-xxiii.
  • Gladstone, J., 172
  • Glasgow merchants support Manchester Act (1736), 24
  • Gras, Early English Customs System, 2n.
  • Greg & Ewart, 170
  • Guest, British Cotton Manufacture, 43, 80n., 94, 95n., 96n., 97n., 111n., 124n.;
  • Compendious History of Cotton Manufacture, 38, 39, 60, 73n., 74n., 96, 108
  • H
  • Hakluyt, 3
  • Halifax, hawkers and pedlars, 64-65
  • Hammond, Cotton Industry, 132n.
  • Hammond, J. L. and B., 83n.
  • Hand-loom. See Loom
  • Hansard, 155n., 156n., 157n.
  • Hanseatic League, xxvi.-xxvii.
  • Hanson, E., Boroughreeve of Manchester, 32n.
  • Hargreaves, of Toddington, improved mule, 123
  • Hargreaves, James, experimented on carding-machines, 78;
  • invented and patented spinning-jenny, 78, 80, 97, 112, 114;
  • left Lancashire through opposition, 82, 92-95;
  • took action for infringement of patent, 93-94;
  • patent not upheld, 92, 96;
  • made spinning-jenny practicable, 97;
  • cotton-mill at Nottingham, 97 and n.;
  • estate of, 97n.;
  • evidence of widow and son against Arkwright, 107;
  • alleged inventor of crank and comb device, 78, 107
  • Hawkers and pedlars, duties on, 63-64
  • Hayes, inventor of roving-engine, 110
  • Heathcote, invented lace-making machine, 131 and n.
  • Highs, Thomas, reputed inventor of jenny and roller-spinning, 94-97, 108, 110, 111;
  • invented double-jenny, 94-95;
  • aptitude for invention, 96;
  • witness against Arkwright, 95;
  • associated with Kay in making roller-spinning machines, 108-110;
  • alleged to have improved carding-machine, 111n.
  • Hollingworth, Mancuniensis, 30
  • Hollingworth, R., 30n.
  • Horrocks & Co., 172
  • Horrocks, J., manufacturer of fine cotton fabrics, 130-131;
  • helped to make power-loom practicable, 140n.;
  • supported Crompton’s appeal to Parliament, 167
  • Horwich, cotton yarns reported to be spun at, in 1510, 2n.
  • Houldsworth, H., fine cotton spinner, 127
  • Houldsworth, T. and J., fine cotton spinner, 127
  • I
  • India, import of cotton fabrics from, 130;
  • export of cotton fabrics to, 130 and n.
  • Industrial Revolution, a general transition in industry and agriculture, xxix., 1, 145-146;
  • an acceleration of previous developments, 145;
  • popular view of, inaccurate, 54;
  • Napoleonic War a dominant factor in, 147-148;
  • social evils of, due to Napoleonic War, 146-148
  • Inventions, effect of, 66, 72, 91;
  • opposition to, 82
  • Ireland, linen-yarn from, used in fustian manufacture, 9, 58;
  • Irish Parliament passed commercial propositions, 104;
  • important source of supply of linen-yarn, 8, 58;
  • different qualities of Irish linen-yarn, 58
  • Italy, early cotton industry of, xxii.
  • J
  • James, T., partner of Hargreaves’, 97
  • Jenny, see Double-Jenny, Hargreaves, Highs;
  • introduction of, 38, 95, 114;
  • was outcome of previous efforts, 145;
  • invention of, 76;
  • controversy as to inventor, 96 and n.;
  • description of, 79-80, 96;
  • greatly facilitated spinning of weft, 97;
  • produced soft thread only suitable for wefts, 116-117;
  • defects of, 80-81;
  • growing use of, 90, 95, 97, 124;
  • number of spindles increased, 80;
  • number at work in 1788 estimated, 121n.;
  • used for waste, 181;
  • used in woollen industry more than in cotton, 124n.;
  • superseded hand-wheel, 124;
  • superseded by mule, 97, 124;
  • conditions when introduced, 88
  • Johnson, helped to make power-loom practicable, 140n.
  • Jones, W., 170
  • Journal of House of Commons, 20n., 23n., 24n., 29n., 36n., 37n., 52, 58n., 59n., 64, 65n., 82n., 89n., 90n., 99n., 102n., 155n., 156n., 157n., 174n.
  • K
  • Kay, John, invented and patented flying-shuttle, 73 and n.;
  • other inventions of, 73;
  • appealed for recognition of his inventions, 73;
  • connection with Arkwright and Thomas Highs, 108;
  • witness against Arkwright in third trial, 108, 111;
  • death in France, 74
  • Kay, Robert, inventor of drop-box, 73
  • Kelly, Wm., manager of New Lanark Mills, applied water-power to mules, and patented self-actor mule, 125
  • Kennedy, James, brother of John, cotton-spinner, 127, 172;
  • came to Lancashire from Kirkcudbright, 127.
  • See Crompton, M‘Connel and Kennedy
  • Kennedy, John, eminence in cotton industry, 126;
  • improved mule, 126 and n.;
  • apprenticeship, 127;
  • connection with M‘Connel & Kennedy terminated, 1826, 132;
  • promoted public subscription on behalf of Crompton, 150;
  • assisted Crompton’s appeal to Parliament, 154, 166-168;
  • raised subscription to purchase annuity for Crompton, 159 and n.;
  • Brief Memoir of S. Crompton, 75n., 78n., 113, 114, 116n., 121, 122n., 123n., 124n., 125n., 130-131, 132n., 154n., 158n., 159;
  • Early Recollections, 127n.;
  • Rise and Progress of Cotton Trade, 75n., 76n., 122n., 126n.
  • Kersies, 6, 7n.
  • Kirkcudbright, migration of young men from, to Lancashire, 127
  • L
  • Lace, demand for fine cotton yarn for manufacture of, 131
  • Lancashire and Cheshire Wills, 2n., 32n., 33n.
  • Lancashire, exempted from provisions of Weavers’ Act, xxv.-xxviii., 4;
  • fustian manufacture, 9, 10;
  • not opposed to restrictive legislation, 20;
  • textile industry, 28, 29;
  • number employed in linen industry, 29;
  • organisation of cloth industry in sixteenth century, 30, 31;
  • workers’ combinations and disturbances, 45;
  • cotton manufacture established by beginning of seventeenth century, 65;
  • cotton manufacture progressive before 1770, 65;
  • new cotton manufacture arose at end of eighteenth century, 66, 72;
  • fine fabrics manufacture, 131;
  • small proprietors engaged in industry, 136;
  • contrast between town and country weavers, 136-137;
  • workers benefit from development, 144;
  • Luddite risings, 154-155.
  • See Cotton Industry, Combinations, Petitions
  • Lancaster traders support Manchester Act (1736), 24;
  • Assizes (1758), 45-46;
  • light punishment of check-weavers, 1759, 51;
  • port of entry for cotton, 57-58
  • Lee, G., promoter of subscription on Crompton’s behalf, 150, 170, 174, 182;
  • predecessor of Robert Owen, 150n.;
  • partner in firm of Phillips & Lee, 150n.;
  • assisted Crompton in appeal to Parliament, 154, 157;
  • evidence before Committee on Crompton’s petition, 187-189, 191;
  • letter relative to amount of award to Crompton, 192
  • Leeds, food riots in 1753, 42
  • Leicester, Luddite risings, 154-155
  • Leigh, a centre of fustian manufacture, 56
  • Leland, Itinerary, 3 and n.
  • Lennox, Duke of, alnager of new drapery, 9, 10, 11, 197n.
  • Leyden, journeymen fullers of, xxiii.
  • Linen industry, numbers employed in, 29;
  • excluded from operations of restrictive legislation. See Lancashire, Manchester, Ireland
  • Linen-yarn, used in fustian manufacture, 9, 29, 58;
  • German used as substitute for Irish, 58
  • Linwood Company, 172
  • Liverpool purchased grain in 1756 to relieve distress, 43;
  • superseded London as chief entry port for cotton, 57-58
  • London Weavers Company oppose Manchester Act (1736), 24;
  • hawkers’ and pedlars’ society, 65n.;
  • silk industry and silk-throwsters, 98n.
  • Loom, hand, 72-73;
  • predecessor of Jacquard loom for weaving draw-boys, 74 and n.
  • Lowe, Present State of England, 147n.
  • Luddite risings in 1811-1812, 154-155
  • M
  • Macclesfield silk-throwsters, 98n.
  • Machine-breaking in 1767 and 1779, 82, 92;
  • causes of, 82-83, 88-90, 95n.
  • Macpherson, Annals of Commerce, 83n., 84n., 85n., 87, 88n.
  • Manchester Athenæum, 119;
  • Court Leet Records, 26n., 32n., 58n.;
  • Directory, 26;
  • analysis of trades from (1772), 67-68;
  • Mercury, 42n., 43, 44, 45, 46, 52, 53n., 54n., 59n., 60n., 62, 63n., 82n., 84n., 85n., 87n., 93, 94n., 95, 101n., 102n., 103n., 104n., 105n., 106n., 110, 119, 136, 143n., 147n.;
  • Statistical Society, Transactions of, 144n., 151n., 155n.
  • Manchester, see Acts (1736), Petitions;
  • eminent for woollen cloths or Manchester cottons, 7n.;
  • Fuller’s account of Manchester cottons, 15;
  • sixteenth-century cloth industry, 30-31;
  • manufactures in 1650 and 1751, 25-26;
  • linen weaving in seventeenth century, 8;
  • lost making of webs and ticks to west of England, 26;
  • made pure cotton goods, 27, 29 and n.;
  • fustian manufacture, 15, 27, 56;
  • growth of thread manufacture, 28n.;
  • Dutch machines and mechanics introduced, 27;
  • packs leaving in 1751, 26;
  • reputation in 1543, 30-31;
  • wheat prices, 1753-1758, 42-43;
  • 1759-1765, 84;
  • food riots, 1753 and 1756, 42-44;
  • in 1762, 84;
  • check-weavers turned out in 1758, 47;
  • and tried in 1759, 51;
  • flourishing in 1759, 52;
  • yarn merchants, 58;
  • Manchester goods exported in sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, 59;
  • trade of, 58-60;
  • carriers, 63, 71;
  • warehouses of country traders in, 69;
  • crofters in Manchester district, 70;
  • first steam cotton factory, 81;
  • precautions against machine-breaking, 82;
  • Society of Agriculture, 86;
  • Assize of Bread in 1766, 85 and n.;
  • Arkwright’s factory, 100;
  • cotton manufacturers’ company, 1774-1778, 101n.;
  • Committees for Protection of Trade, 100-101, 103, 118-119;
  • manufacturers oppose Irish commercial propositions, 104;
  • riots in 1812, 154-155, 157;
  • Society for Prosecution of Felons, 159n.
  • Mansfield, Lord, charge to jury regarding combinations, 45-46, 51;
  • advocated repeal of Statute of Apprentices, 51
  • Mantoux, P., La Révolution Industrielle, 96n., 97, 100n.
  • Marsland, P., 172
  • Marriott, J., threadmaker, 28n.
  • Martineau, H., History of the Peace, 83n.
  • May, J., Declaration of the Estate of Clothing, 6n., 10, 11n.;
  • deputy alnager, 10
  • M‘Connel, James, eminence in cotton industry, 127;
  • left Kirkcudbright and was apprenticed to Cannan, 127
  • M‘Connel & Kennedy, began business (1791) with capital of £250, 150;
  • made machinery and rovings, 124n., 128;
  • size of mules made by, 162;
  • supplied Belfast and Glasgow with fine cotton yarns, 132;
  • correspondence of, reveals industrial situation, 147n.
  • See Crompton
  • M‘Hewham, J. and J., 172
  • Mellor, description of, 136-138;
  • census (1801), details of, 138
  • Merchant Adventurers’ Company, xxv.-xxvii.
  • Meredith, H. O., Economic History of England, 83n.
  • Middleton, size of farms in, 136;
  • farms held by weavers, 316
  • Midgley, T., curator of Chadwick Museum, Bolton. See Bolton, Souvenir of Royal Visit to
  • Milne, invented cotton-roving machine, 103;
  • subscription on behalf of, 103, 119, 120
  • Monthly Literary and Scientific Lecturer, 22n.;
  • Monthly Magazine, 120
  • Mordaunt, Col., defendant in trial for infringement of Arkwright’s patent, 102
  • Morris, introduced Paul’s carding-machine into Lancashire, 78
  • Mosier, W., chapman, 33, 34
  • Mosley, A., clothier, business and accounts of, xxv., 33;
  • will of, 32 and n.;
  • Sir N., Lord of Manor of Manchester, 32
  • Mule, see Billy, Jenny, Crompton;
  • called Hall-o’-th’-Wood wheel, 166, 168, 173, 190-191;
  • description of, 117-118, 162;
  • value to cotton industry, 169-170, 173, 180;
  • corrected defects of Arkwright’s machinery, 117, 179-180;
  • relation to jenny and Arkwright’s machinery, 116, 117, 119, 172-173, 179, 180;
  • produced satisfactory thread for fine work, 116, 118, 124, 128-129, 173, 179-180, 191;
  • produced thread suitable for warps and wefts, 117, 167, 173;
  • produced fine muslin and cambric manufactures, 129, 169, 173, 180, 186-187, 190;
  • partly superseded water-frame, 124, 163, 189;
  • superior to ring-frame for higher qualities of yarn, 164;
  • increasing use, 121 and n., 187;
  • increase in size and improvement, 121-123, 125, 126 and n., 162-163;
  • present-day mules, 163-164;
  • value of machines, buildings and power in 1812, 191;
  • employment resulting from, 169, 181, 188, 191
  • Mule, double, superseded single, 125 and n.;
  • mule, self-actor, not at first satisfactory, 125;
  • improvements of mule culminated in, 163
  • Mule-spinners, high wages, 122;
  • privations and organisation of, 144 and n.
  • Murray, Adam, apprenticed to Cannan on leaving Kirkcudbright, 127
  • Murray, A. and G., 127, 172.
  • See Mule, Oldknow, Shaw
  • Muslins, Eastern manufacture of, 129;
  • Continental demand for muslin yarns, 131;
  • British manufacture of, 129n.
  • N
  • Need, S., in partnership with Arkwright, 98, 103
  • New Lanark cotton mills erected, xxx., 106, 172.
  • See Owen, Arkwright
  • Northumberland excluded from provisions of Weavers’ Act, 4
  • Norwich, opposition of woollen manufacturers to printed fustians, 23;
  • export of English, 7
  • Nottingham, Earl of, 18;
  • lace industry, 131;
  • Luddite risings, 154-155
  • O
  • Ogden, Description of Manchester, 26-29, 37-39, 40, 73, 74n., 80n., 94n., 95n.
  • Oldham, a centre of fustian manufacture, 56
  • Oldknow, S., made fine fabrics, muslins, etc., 129n., 130-131, 172
  • Orr, W. and J., 172
  • Owen, Robert, apprenticeship, 129n.;
  • connection with New Lanark Mills, 106;
  • began to manufacture mules, 126, 127;
  • spinner of thread from rovings, 124n.;
  • Autobiography, 106n., 124n., 125n., 126n., 129n., 150n.
  • P
  • Papplewick, first steam cotton-mill at, 81
  • Patents, general dislike of, prevalent, 118
  • Paul, Lewis, first patent embodying idea of spinning by rollers, 76, 111;
  • but not very successful, 76-77;
  • second patent (1758), 77;
  • invented pinking-machine, 77;
  • carding-machine of, 77-78, 111
  • Peel, Robert, of yeoman class, 142;
  • experimented with carding-machines, 78;
  • his machinery destroyed, 92n.;
  • opposition to Arkwright’s patents, 102-120;
  • opposed Irish commercial propositions, 104;
  • number of employees (1784), 104;
  • failed to persuade Crompton to join his business, 149;
  • exerted himself on Crompton’s behalf, 149, 167, 175, 176, 184, 192, 193;
  • evidence to Committee on Crompton’s petition, 186;
  • his opinion valued by Government, 174
  • Peel, Robert, junior, 172
  • Peel, Yates & Co., 172
  • Penistone cloth, 6
  • Perceval, Spencer, his part in Crompton’s appeal to Parliament, 174-176, 178;
  • assassination of, 157
  • Percival, T., accused of assisting check-weavers’ combination, 47;
  • proposals for settlement, 48-52;
  • Letter to a Friend, 46-51, 56n., 57n.
  • Peterborough, opposition to Manchester Act (1736), 24
  • Petitions, for import of cotton wool (1654), 12-13;
  • against import of cotton fabrics, 20;
  • of fustian manufacturers, 23;
  • of Lancashire clothiers, 31;
  • against truck payments, 36;
  • from travelling merchants against being classed as hawkers, 61;
  • on account of distress (1780), 88-89;
  • of silk manufacturers regarding decline of trade, 98n.;
  • for and against Arkwright’s patents, 102-103;
  • from Weymouth against prohibition of calicoes, etc., 21;
  • from Manchester and Bolton (1808) for peace, 154-155;
  • from Blackburn and Preston (1812) against continuance of war, 156
  • Piacenza, light cottons of, xxii.
  • Pitman, Development of British West Indies, 88n.
  • Pococke, Travels Through England, 28n.
  • Pollard, J., 127
  • Power-loom, 125, 140
  • Price, W. H., “On Beginning of Cotton Industry in England,” 8n., 9n., 195n., 197n.
  • Proctor, Memorials of Bygone Manchester, 25n.
  • Putting-out system, 56, 143
  • Q
  • Quarterly Journal of Economics, 8n.
  • R
  • Radcliffe, Origin of Power-Loom Weaving, xxix., 56n., 59n., 60, 133, 135, 136, 142;
  • helped to make power-loom practicable, 140n.
  • Raines and Sutton, Life of Humphrey Chetham, 34, 35, 59n.
  • Reading, industries and numbers employed in eighteenth century, 28n.
  • Records of Fort St George, 16n.
  • Regulation of industry and commerce, see Acts of Parliament;
  • broke down in seventeenth century, 65-66
  • Report on Commerce, Manufacturers and Shipping (1833), 22n., 134n.;
  • Report of Committee on Textile Trades, 1n., 130n.;
  • Report of Committee on Cotton Weavers’, etc., Petitions, 144n.;
  • Report of Committee on Emigration, etc. (1826-1827), 136-137;
  • Report of Committee on State of Children Employed in Manufactories, 91n., 126n., 127n.;
  • Report of Tenth International Cotton Congress, 164
  • Riders-out, 62
  • Ridgway, J., evidence before Committee on Crompton’s Petition, 191
  • Ridgway, T., & Sons, 172
  • Ring-spinning frame, modern rival of mule, 163;
  • predominates outside U.K., 164;
  • statistics of, 164
  • Roberts, Lewis, Treasure of Traffike, 8, 12, 57n.
  • Roberts, Richard, invented satisfactory self-actor mule, 125;
  • perfected power-loom, 125;
  • owned nearly a hundred patents, 125n.
  • Robinson, J., 172
  • Rochdale, small farms held by manufacturers, 136
  • Roller-spinning. See Arkwright, Paul
  • Roscoe, W., 172
  • Rothschild, Nathan Meyer, xxx.-xxxi.
  • Roving, methods of, 79;
  • making of rovings became a distinct business, 124
  • Royton, 144
  • S
  • Salford, Society of Agriculture, 86
  • Schoff, Periplus of Erythrean Sea, 129n.
  • Scotland: Scotch linen yarn imported for fustian manufacture, 9, 58;
  • fancy manufacture, 131, 180;
  • effects of mule on, 180, 188, 190
  • Scott, Prof. W. R., 18n.;
  • Joint Stock Companies, 12n., 16n., 18n., 19n., 66n.
  • Shaw, J., attempted to manufacture muslins, 125
  • Shop-tax, 63-64
  • Shrewsbury, chapmen’s society, 65
  • Silk industry, factory system developed earlier than in cotton industry, 98 and n.;
  • organisation in eighteenth century, 98n.
  • See London, Macclesfield
  • Simpson, J., 172
  • Slack, Remarks on Cotton, 58n.
  • Smallware, see Checks, Worsted;
  • articles included in, 25;
  • worsted entered into smallware manufacture, 29;
  • weavers’ combination and attack on, 44-45;
  • further dispute in 1781, 53-54
  • Smiles, S., Huguenots, 12n.;
  • Industry and Invention, 98n.;
  • Lives of Engineers, 61n., 81n., 104n.
  • Smith, Wars Between England and America, 83n.
  • Smollett, History of England, 42n., 46n.
  • Spinning, backwardness in 1735, 74;
  • reward offered for invention of machinery, 78;
  • improvement after 1760, 78.
  • See Roller-spinning
  • Spinning-jenny. See Jenny
  • Spinning-wheel, method of spinning by, 75;
  • Jersey and Brunswick, 75;
  • Saxony, used mainly for flax and wool, 75
  • Stanley, Colonel, supported Crompton’s appeal to Parliament, 174-175, 178;
  • Lord, supported Crompton’s appeal to Parliament, 174-178, 192, 193;
  • Chairman of Committee on Crompton’s petition, 186, 191
  • State Papers Domestic, 5n., 6, 7, 8n., 13n., 17n., 18n., 19n., 31, 66, 195, 196
  • Stirling, W., & Sons, 172
  • Stockport, food riots in 1757, 43n.;
  • muslin manufacture, see Oldknow
  • Stones, H., first made mules after Crompton, 123;
  • improved mule, 123
  • Strutt, J., in partnership with Arkwright, 98, 103;
  • of yeoman class, 142
  • T
  • Taunton Cloth, 6
  • Tawney, R. H., Assessment of Wages by Justices of Peace, 49n.
  • Taylor, patented a spinning machine, 78
  • Tenters, use of, prohibited, 5
  • Thompson, R., & Sons, 172
  • Throstle, an improvement of water-frame, 163
  • Tipping, S. and G., linen drapers, of Manchester, 32 and n., 34.
  • See Chetham, H. and G.
  • Todd, Shorbridge & Co., 172
  • Tooke, History of Prices, 83n.
  • Touchet, J. T. and G., & Co., 172
  • Travelling merchants, or Manchester men, method and scale of business, 61-62
  • Trade unions, see Combinations;
  • development checked by Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 55, 148
  • Truck payments. See Acts (1702)
  • U
  • Ulm, fustian industry of, xxii.
  • Unwin, Prof. G., Industrial Organisation in XVIth and XVIIth Centuries, 4n., 36n., 49n., 53 and n., 66n., 101n.;
  • Gilds and Companies of London, 66n.
  • Ure, Cotton Manufacture, 16n., 29n., 76n., 81n., 119, 122n., 131n., 162
  • V
  • Venice, cotton imports of, xxii.
  • Vermilions, manufactured from cotton-wool from Cyprus and Smyrna, 8
  • W
  • Wages, effects of new machinery on, 90-91;
  • of hand-loom weavers, 1795-1807, 134n.
  • Wakefield traders support Manchester Act (1736), 24
  • Water-frame, see Arkwright, Throstle; was outcome of previous efforts, 145;
  • complementary to jenny, 80;
  • spinning and winding simultaneous with, 81;
  • horse-power employed with, 81;
  • useful for coarser counts and warp yarn, 124;
  • incapable of spinning weft or producing thread of fine texture, 172-173, 179, 180, 186, 190;
  • influence on expansion of cotton industry, 179
  • Ware, Life and Correspondence of S. Hibbert, 58n., 63n.
  • Warrington, industries and numbers employed in eighteenth century, 28n.
  • Wars:
  • Seven Years’ War and War of American Independence, cause heavy taxation, 63;
  • and dislocation of trade and distress, 46, 86-89;
  • French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, economic effects of, 83, 130, 144;
  • intensified effects of economic change, 146;
  • checked movement for social development, 146-148;
  • Napoleonic War, social retrogression due to, 146-148;
  • repression and class legislation due to, 146-147;
  • situation created by, compared with European War, 147;
  • dominant factor in social and economic history, 147-148;
  • left disturbed industrial relationships, 148;
  • caused fluctuation of trade and distress, 154;
  • crisis of 1810, 154;
  • with America in 1812, 154
  • Watt, J., patents steam-engine, 81;
  • supports Arkwright in second trial, 104;
  • evidence before Committee on Crompton’s petition, 189
  • Weavers’ Act (1555). See Acts
  • Webb, S. and B., History of Trade Unionism, 49n., 52, 147n.
  • Westerfield, Middlemen in English Business, 61, 62
  • Westmorland, excluded from provisions of Weavers’ Act, 4
  • Weymouth, cotton manufacturers’ petition, 21
  • Wheeler, History of Manchester, 92n., 102n.
  • Whitehaven, traders support Manchester Act (1736), 24;
  • port of entry for cotton, 57-58
  • Whitsters. See Crofters
  • Wilks, The Half Century, 83n.
  • Wolstenholme, patent for manufacture of cotton velveteen, 101
  • Worsted smallware, see Combinations, Checks;
  • four classes engaged in making, 40;
  • fortunes of manufacturers, 40-41;
  • apprenticeship regulations, 41;
  • undertakers, 40, 41;
  • weavers wish to control employment conditions, 42-44;
  • wages problem in 1756, 42-43
  • Weavers’ Apology, 40, 44
  • Wright constructed double-mule, 125
  • Wylde, partner of S. Crompton, 158
  • Wylie and Briscoe, History of Nottingham, 97n.
  • Y
  • Yarn, see Cotton, Linen;
  • fine, small capital of leading early spinners, 127;
  • fine, demand for, 131;
  • distribution of, among country weavers, 143
  • Yates, W., supported Crompton’s appeal to Parliament, 167, 170, 174
  • Yeomen, affected by industrial changes, 139-140;
  • turned attention to industry, 141;
  • obtained machines and produced yarn in farm-houses, 141;
  • unable to compete with factories, 141-142;
  • lost agricultural status, 141-142;
  • a few successful as steam manufacturers, 142
  • Yorkshire exempted from provisions of Weavers’ Act, xxviii., 4;
  • Luddite risings, 154-155