WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments cover

The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved in 50 Arguments

Chapter 4: Introduction
Open in WeRead

About This Book

The author advances a systematic critique of evolutionary explanations for human origins through fifty numbered arguments, claiming mathematical and probabilistic refutations and contesting evidence from paleontology, embryology, serology, biometry, and heredity. The first section targets physical and geographic claims about human ancestry and species change, the second responds to paleontological and anatomical evidence often cited for evolution, and the final section treats the soul, personality, conscience, immortality, sin, and redemption, arguing that evolutionary ideas undermine religious belief and affirming a theistic account with moral and spiritual implications.

The Evolution of Man Mathematically Disproved

Introduction

Let it be understood, at the outset, that every proved theory of science is to be accepted. Only the most intense prejudice and the maddest folly would lead any one to reject the proved conclusions of science. Moreover, we should examine any new hypothesis with open minds, to see if it has in it anything truthful, helpful or advantageous. It should neither be accepted nor rejected simply because it is new. But if a theory is evidently or probably untrue, or pernicious, or at all harmful, it is to be rejected and condemned.

Some facts and objections are herein submitted to the serious seeker after truth, in the hope that a theory so out of harmony with the facts, and so destructive to the faith and the cherished hopes of man, may be completely discarded. As Evolution can not stand the acid test of mathematics, it will be repudiated by all.

We shall discuss the theory upon its merits, from a scientific standpoint, and will also demand an explanation of all facts concerned, as we have a right to do, even where they are associated with the theological and the spiritual as well as the material. We do not oppose true science but “science falsely so called.” We do not ban research, but will not allow the wild vagaries of the imagination to pass as truth.

We shall not declare arbitrarily that evolution is untrue; neither will we allow scientists to decide what we shall believe. But we shall appeal to the facts, and evolution must stand or fall by the evidence. “Evolution is not to be accepted until proved.” It is not yet proved and never will be.