WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
The Light Invisible cover

The Light Invisible

Chapter 2: Preface
Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

About This Book

A narrator records an elderly priest's accounts of a heightened spiritual perception that renders the unseen as vividly visible. Beginning with childhood intimations and proceeding through episodic visions, the priest describes moments when the natural and supernatural appear simultaneously, and he reflects on focus, discernment, and obedience to revealed doctrine. The narrative interweaves vivid sensory scenes, liturgical settings, and moral dilemmas, showing how grace, suffering, and temptation shape interior life. Throughout, contemplative commentary examines the limits of personal experience, the role of ascetic practice, and the tension between private insight and communal theology.

Preface

My friend, whose talk I have reported in this book so far as I am able, would be the first to disclaim (as indeed he was always anxious to do) the rôle of an accredited teacher, other than that which his sacred office conferred on him.

All that he claimed (and this surely was within his rights) was to be at least sincere in his perceptions and expressions of spiritual truth. His power, as he was at pains to tell me, was no more than a particular development of a faculty common to all who possess a coherent spiritual life. To one Divine Truth finds entrance through laws of nature, to another through the medium of other sciences or arts; to my friend it presented itself in directly sensible forms. Had his experiences, however, even seemed to contravene Divine Revelation, he would have rejected them with horror: entire submission to the Divine Teacher upon earth, as he more than once told me, should normally precede the exercise of all other spiritual faculties. The deliberate reversal of this is nothing else than Protestantism in its extreme form, and must ultimately result in the extinction of faith.

For the rest, I can add nothing to his own words. It is of course more than possible that here and there I have failed to present his exact meaning; but at least I have taken pains to submit the book before publication to the judgment of those whose theological learning is sufficient to reassure me that at least I have not so far misunderstood my friend’s words and tales, as to represent him as transgressing the explicit laws of ascetical, moral, mystical, or dogmatic theology.

To these counsellors I must express my gratitude, as well as to others who have kindly given me the encouragement of their sympathy.

R. B.