WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
The Old World in the New / The Significance of Past and Present Immigration to the American People cover

The Old World in the New / The Significance of Past and Present Immigration to the American People

Chapter 124: TABLE V
Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

About This Book

A wide-ranging sociological account traces how successive immigrant arrivals shaped the nation's population, surveying distinct ethnic streams, their settlement patterns, social traits, occupational choices, and rates of assimilation. The author analyzes selective migration forces, frontier influences, and the effects of newcomers on labor markets, wages, unions, industry, and agriculture, and examines social consequences including housing, schools, family life, crime, alcoholism, and communal persistence. The study balances demographic and cultural description with policy-focused discussion of social cohesion, public institutions, and the long-term implications of immigration for national standards and civic life.

TABLE V

PER CENT. OF IMMIGRANTS FROM NORTHERN AND WESTERN EUROPE AND FROM SOUTHERN AND EASTERN EUROPE, 1820 TO 1910

 NorthernSouthernTotalOther
 andandfromspecified
Period.Western.Eastern.Europe.countries.
1820-183087.02.989.910.1
1831-184092.51.193.76.3
1841-185095.9.396.23.8
1851-186094.6.895.54.5
1861-187088.51.589.910.1
1871-188073.77.180.819.2
1881-189072.018.390.39.7
1891-190044.852.897.52.5
1901-191021.871.993.76.3

TABLE VI

OLD AND NEW IMMIGRATION COMPARED WITH RESPECT TO ABILITY OF THE FOREIGN-BORN TO READ, BY RACE[1] (STUDY OF EMPLOYEES)

 Per cent.
 able to
Old Immigration.read.
Canadian, French88.1
Canadian, other98.9
Dutch97.6
English98.8
German98.0
Irish95.8
Scotch99.5
Swedish99.8
Welsh98.1
New Immigration.
Bulgarian78.1
Croatian70.9
Greek80.5
Hebrew, Russian93.1
Hebrew, other92.5
Italian, North83.3
Italian, South67.5
Lithuanian77.3
Magyar91.0
Polish79.9
Portuguese47.5
Roumanian82.6
Russian74.5
Ruthenian65.8
Servian71.3
Slovak84.4
Slovenian87.5
Spanish98.1
Syrian63.6

TABLE VII

OLD AND NEW IMMIGRATION COMPARED WITH RESPECT TO
FOREIGN-BORN HUSBANDS REPORTING WIFE
ABROAD, BY RACE.[2]
(STUDY OF EMPLOYEES)

 Per cent
 Reporting
 Wife
Old Immigration.Abroad.
Canadian, French1.5
Dutch3.8
English3.4
German4.3
Irish1.2
Scotch3.2
Swedish2.9
Welsh1.4
New Immigration.
Bulgarian90.0
Croatian59.3
Greek74.7
Hebrew, Russian12.5
Italian, North31.6
Italian, South36.9
Lithuanian23.3
Magyar43.3
Polish23.0
Portuguese15.9
Roumanian73.9
Russian45.5
Servian64.5
Slovak34.2
Slovenian33.7

TABLE VIII

OLD AND NEW IMMIGRATION COMPARED WITH RESPECT TO
ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH.[3]
(STUDY OF EMPLOYEES)

Old Immigration.
Nationality.Per cent.
Danish96.5
Dutch86.1
French68.6
German87.5
Norwegian96.9
Swedish94.7
Average82.2
New Immigration.
Bulgarian20.3
Croatian50.9
Greek33.5
South Italian48.7
Lithuanian51.3
Macedonian21.1
Magyar46.4
Montenegrin38.0
Polish43.5
Roumanian33.3
Ruthenian36.8
Russian43.6
Servian41.2
Slovak55.6
Slovenian51.7
Syrian54.6
Turkish22.5
Average40.8

TABLE IX

FOREIGN-BORN IN URBAN AND RURAL COMMUNITIES, 1910

Old Immigration.
 PerPer
CountryCentCent
of Birth.Urban.Rural.
Belgium59.640.4
Denmark48.351.7
England72.627.4
France69.930.1
Germany66.733.3
Holland54.945.1
Ireland84.715.3
Norway42.257.8
Scotland72.427.6
Sweden60.639.4
Switzerland53.946.1
New Immigration.
Austria72.427.6
Balkan States50.949.1
Finland50.50.
Greece71.428.6
Hungary77.322.7
Italy78.121.9
Portugal69.630.4
Roumania91.98.1
Russia87.13.
Turkey, in Asia86.713.3
Turkey, in Europe79.520.5

FOREIGN WHITE STOCK, BY PRINCIPAL COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN: 1910.


INDEX