WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
The practice of osteopathy cover

The practice of osteopathy

Chapter 216: FOOTNOTES:
Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

About This Book

This work provides a comprehensive overview of osteopathy, detailing its principles, techniques, and applications in diagnosing and treating various medical conditions. It discusses osteopathic etiology and pathology, emphasizing the importance of understanding bodily lesions and their implications for health. The text covers diagnostic methods, treatment techniques, and the relationship between osteopathy and other medical practices. Contributions from various specialists enhance the content, addressing specific areas such as infectious diseases, mental health, and post-operative care. The authors aim to present a balanced view of osteopathy, acknowledging its successes while also recognizing its limitations.

The use of cold compresses on the chest I do not favor. They are used by some osteopathic physicians, but I believe the result is better with other methods. Applied in a hospital where the technique is well in hand they might be successful, but personally I fear them. I am even careful about putting an ice bag on the heart. Cold packs are sometimes used in my practice but only on the head for pain or delirium. Chill must be avoided. Warmth must be conserved, even the fever is benign.

Neither do I favor “rub-on” of camphor, turpentine or onions when they irritate the patient. If the patient has been used to them or has faith in them and wants them I order them. I also order something of the kind where “something must be done”. When a family calls a doctor they “want something done,” and it is best to do something; ever keeping in mind, however, that our patient’s strength must be conserved.

I do favor “rub-ons” in that I think it is well to keep the skin soft with some oil. It helps to keep an even temperature and the skin active. The skin should be wiped dry often, however, to remove the skin secretions which if left on become stale.

I remember being called to see one little girl who could not get her breath, and found she was holding her nose with the bed clothes. She told me that the smell and stickiness of the lard and turpentine and the onions made her so sick and uncomfortable that she felt she could stand it no longer. When she was cleaned up, and clothed in nice clean white cotton she showed a wonderful improvement, and it was real as well as apparent.

As to baths in influenza, I instruct the nurse to bathe the patient only as necessary for cleanliness and his comfort. Dabbling around in water is not a safe procedure in a disease where pneumonia is so easily contracted.

I do not use alcohol rubs where the patient is in anything like a serious condition, as alcohol closes the pores and dries out the skin. A rubbing or massage by the nurse is good for a restless, nervous patient, but it had better be done with olive oil or some other good oil. In influenza we do not want the pores closed. We need elimination, and all we can get. A small saving of vitality or a little elimination of toxins may be the margin that saves a patient for us. I do not favor the use of turpentine, for if it is absorbed it irritates an already sick kidney; if it is not absorbed it is useless. Why disturb the patient?

For the bronchial irritation, in addition to osteopathic treatment, and the accessory mustard plasters, inhalation of steam is often used. A pan of boiling water is set by the bed and the patient leans over the edge of the bed with a bed-sheet or paper over the head and steam vessel, breathing the steam as long as it lasts.

For the throat most any cleansing gargle can be used but I prefer the use of the common baking soda gargle. I have about one-half teaspoonful of soda placed in a glass and boiling hot water poured over it. As soon as this is cool enough to use I have the patient gargle thoroughly. The idea is to get the mouth, pharynx and tonsillar area clean and free from accumulations. Lemon-water gargle is often gratefully accepted.

If a very sick patient breathes through a dirty and dried-out mouth, all the stage is set for him to draw into the devitalized lung large quantities of infectious material. For this reason if not for the comfort of the patient it is necessary that the mouth be kept clean and also moist.

It is not possible to kill this germ life with any antiseptic. The field must be made and kept clean.

The nasal passage also should be looked after, to keep it clean as possible and also to allow the patient to breathe through the nose.

For the nasal passage any good non-irritating oil is effective but I like best 2½ iodine in oil. It is a good lubricant and as far as possible we do get the germicical action of the iodine.

Patients asking me what to do to avoid influenza are advised to keep the mouth clean and closed and to use the oily solution of iodine in the nasal passages.

And when treating the respiratory tract we must keep in mind the fact that all healing comes from the blood side of a membrane. No healing ever comes to a membrane from its exposed surface. Local treatment to a membrane must be a treatment which removes irritation, not one which adds more. Healing must come from within. “The rule of the artery is supreme.”

Diet.—The diet used is liquid, so that the digestive functions will be taxed as little as possible, for they are weak at this time. Fruit and vegetable juices only are used.

The influenza germ propagates largely in the intestine and if the intestine has in it the products of a full diet the bacterial growth soon overpowers the patient. Germ life cannot develop on fruit and vegetable juices.

Another reason for using the liquid and fruit diet is that influenza is a disease running a short course and feeding is not necessary. If it were a disease such as typhoid, running a fever for several weeks, we would then give a more liberal diet, but the patient’s strength will not be lost on a liquid and fruit-juice diet in three or even eight days.

The frequency with which the urine contains albumin in this disease shows us what a heavy load the kidneys are carrying. This makes a salt-free diet advisable and again brings fruit juice to our favorable attention.

To activate the kidneys and thus relieve the headache we give always plenty of water and often hot lemonade. Orange juice and lemonade are used frequently as are blackberry, raspberry, pineapple, loganberry and grape juices. When the acid juices are not well borne we use non-acid juices, such as pear and raspberry juice. A ripe, cooked pear mashed with a fork and mixed with one or two different fruit juices makes a satisfying dish.

Bottled sweet cider is also a most valuable food and a good beverage. We use it in almost every case and find it the most acceptable to the patient of any food offered. I am of the opinion that apple cider has been neglected as an article of diet, both in disease and health, but especially in fevers. It contains considerable iron for the blood, as well as having considerable food value. It has the added virtue of being pleasing to the patient.

In addition to these juices we often use spinach juice. I have the nurse get a can of the best grade spinach and serve the juice hot, as a broth, with a little salt and pepper and perhaps celery salt and a piece of bacon in it to flavor it and to appeal to the patient. Spinach juice contains much iron and iodine in a form readily absorbable by the blood. It also is useful in maintaining the alkalinity of the blood and body fluids, thus counteracting the acidosis of the disease. It renders the urine alkaline and thus relieves the kidneys of the irritation of acidosis and of an acid urine. Where the kidneys are or are likely to be involved the spinach juice must be served without salt.

All the mentioned fruit juices tend to counteract acidosis and produce alkalinity, but are not so effective as the spinach juice. They have the advantage, however, of being used in larger quantities. The spinach juice has considerable food value and has the added value of appealing to the patient’s reason, when the iron and iodine content is explained to him. It is especially useful when treating those patients who are wondering if they should not be getting some sort of “tonic.”

The juice taken from ground fresh lettuce is also valuable. It contains more iron, iodine and phosphates than the spinach but it is not so easy to prepare. I have used it in the cases of several anemic and quite sick babies and consider it well worth all the expense and effort it took to secure it.

The breaking down of the alkaline reserve of the body and the consequent acidosis, comes early in the disease and is disastrous, and all the attention given to the diet is amply repaid in results. Careful attention to the diet is the only way the acidosis can be overcome.

Raw fruit and vegetable juices also supply that most valuable element, vitamines. For this one thing alone is the raw fruit juice most valuable. I do not believe too much attention can be given to securing a liberal supply of vitamines for the body, especially during an attack of fever.

Some especially interesting points are brought out by contributors to the Journal of the American Osteopathic Association in the March, 1919 number. I wish here to add a discussion of these points. The contributors are physicians and good representatives of our profession and they report uniform and excellent success in handling the recent epidemic.

It seems to be the consensus of opinion that the treatment should be specific and light to avoid fatigue, with the possible exception of the first treatment, which often should be general and vigorous.

All are agreed that the patient should be kept in bed, not even leaving it to go to the bath room. The patient must be protected in every way from fatigue and exposure. The enema was used by all. A number of writers state plainly their opposition to the use of physics and laxatives. A hot tub-bath is recommended by several, but there is opposition to much bathing.

Practically all the writers used the fruit-juice diet. However, a few gave a heavier diet and were successful with their patients, which is one more proof that the osteopathic treatment is the deciding factor in bringing about a cure.

J. R. Thornton wrote after having had about 100 cases. He speaks especially of his cases of pneumonia. They resolved by crisis. There were no deaths. He says: “All cases were, preceding the first treatment, given a generous plain water enema. Orders were left for two enemas per day until told to discontinue, and in most cases the patient got the enema. A few cases, with the highest fever, the stationary fever, were given tap-water enemas, one each hour until the temperature dropped two or three degrees.

“Sponge baths were given to reduce fever in every case. Diet was liquid until the temperature was normal.

“The osteopathic treatment of the usual spinal work, paying special attention to cervical and dorsal areas, and strong inhibition.

“Pneumonia cases were treated three to five times a day and had as much time as they required at each visit. They required action. Heating compresses were used on each case, except the ice bag to the heart when rapid. One case of delirium was treated with ice caps to the head and neck. Normal salt solution per rectum. Murphy drip was given in each case. Diet, liquid consisting of egg-nog, milk, strained soup and broth.”

Mary Alexander Patton: “Treatment should be quick, every motion significant so as not to tire the patient, for exhaustion is always present. Each patient was treated two or three times a day until temperature became normal. The nasal douche was given twice a day followed by K-Y jelly. Hot soap bath followed by soap enema and enteroclysis when fever persisted.”

W. Curtis Brigham ordered “Hot packs the full length of the spine twenty to thirty minutes, three times a day. This will produce profuse sweating and often put the patient to sleep.”

I have used this same treatment, especially in nervous cases, and hold it in high esteem. I have the patient put a bath robe on backwards so that the arms and legs are well protected but the spine easily accessible. The hot packs can then be used and covered over and the patient not exposed.

R. H. Nuckles maintains that lung and ear trouble will not follow influenza where osteopathic treatment has been given to adjust the cervical and upper dorsal circulation.

H. A. Price: “We have kept particularly in mind, first, the nerve, blood and lymphatic supply to the lungs; second, the circulation to the spine (meaning spinal cord); third, the internal secretory functions and to the general excretion.”

Ralph M. Crane says: “A great deal of my work is among the Italians. It was necessary to give quick specific treatment that I might do as much good as possible to the greatest number. I did not treat them as often as I would like to, and because of this fact I learned that osteopathy got control of the ‘flu’ immediately, the first treatment sufficing to start them on the road to recovery; in fact, many of them got no more than one treatment.”


FOOTNOTES:

[51] Hinckle—The Scientific Basis of Osteopathy.

[52] Clinical Osteopathy.

[53] Journal of Osteopathy—Prize Article July, 1906.

[54] A. O. A. Case Reports—Series I.

[55] E. Link, Diphtheria—The Bulletin, 1905.

[56] A. M. Willard, Membranous Croup—Journal of Osteopathy, March, 1904

[57] See Dr. Still—Philosophy and Mechanical Principles of Osteopathy.

[58] Journal of Osteopathy, October 1905.

[59] Journal of Osteopathy, October 1905.

[60] Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, March 1906.

[61] Journal American Osteopathic Association, December 1904.

[62] Journal American Osteopathic Association, May, 1905.

[63] Journal American Osteopathic Association, May, 1905.

[64] Rewritten from article in Osteopathic Physician, June 1919.

[65] This treatment was described by Henry M. Stovel, in The Osteopathic Physician of January 1917.

[66] O. P. June 1919.