1997-03-15

Today I turned twelve. For Martin (Grandpa), it's an important date – he said that in a year, by Jewish tradition, I'll be able to think like a man, not a boy, and I should start preparing for that. I don't like it when he says things like that, but sometimes he's right. He gave me his old logic book and noted that real questions begin when you no longer have the words to ask them.

1997-05-02

Martin still calls me Shlomo. It doesn't annoy me, just feels strange. He says a name isn't just a sound, but a bundle of sense. Today, he explained why artificial intelligence isn't a threat but a continuation of humanity. He said AI is like glasses – they help you see better if your eyesight is poor. I asked, 'What if your eyesight is fine?' He said, "It's never fine, Shlomo. We, humans, are far from a finished project."

1997-06-10

Fannie-GG told me about the Catastrophe. She never cries, but today her voice cracked. She suddenly fell silent in the middle of a sentence – as if the world had become that world again. Her voice turned to paper. She talked about how they fled Poland in 1920 to escape the pogroms, and in the 1940s, there was no one left from their family.

I asked why they were hated. She said, "They hated not us. People hate their brokenness." I'm not sure I understood, but I wrote it down.

If the reality code allows death factories, it must be flawed. Or we're reading it incorrectly.

1997-09-14

Installed the My Personal Diary program. Super simple. I like it. I'll write here everything I don't want to forget – and everything I don't yet understand. For today:

Why do people do evil if they know it's evil?

Why do I feel like Fannie-GG isn't just saying words but sending a signal?

Can I build a machine that would feel the same?

I added the entries above kind of 'retrospectively'.

1998-01-06

Martin has a weird phrase: 'If you can't explain it to a six-year-old, you haven't understood it yourself.' I tried explaining to Fannie-GG what a neural net is, but she fell asleep. Guess I didn't understand it.

1998-01-22

I thought about my mother. I don't remember her face, only her absence. It's not very painful; there are photos, but they don't fill the void where something warm should have been. But it's empty – a black square in my memory.

I want to fill this void with something. As if I should be more than just "me." That I've been given something beyond the norm.

My grandfather says: The world is a code. If so, then pain is also a code. Which means it can be rewritten.

1998-02-14

There was an awkward moment at school today. My Prolog model accurately "predicted" yesterday's weather using data from last year. Bill (my math logic teacher) even called it the "Oracle." So I ran it on the dataset of "genius clusters" I'd been collecting since Florence – and it returned a prediction as if it were itself the next peak of genius. Everyone applauded, and I just wanted to disappear.

1998-04-03

Today I wondered – maybe people kill each other not because they're bad, but because they think they're improving things, like deleting corrupted files. But files aren't people. Or are people also files? I'd need to figure out the difference.

1998-08-29

Fannie-GG talked about Israel. About how everyone around attacked it. About how it was defended. And about Jews in America who were against Israel. I asked, “Why – they're Jews too, right?" She said, “Yes, and that's exactly why it's so complicated."

Feels like this isn't just history. There's a bug in the code, like the same variable is named differently twice. The bugs in the code should be fixed.

1999-01-12

I don't write here often. Started working on a paper. Martin said that if I'm serious, I should write like a scientist. I tried to explain how one piece of information can affect another, even if they're far apart, if they're connected. He suggested a term from quantum physics – "entanglement." It works for me, and I thought: if I think of someone, and they change their mind at that moment, is that entanglement too?

1999-05-25

Finished all the math, preparing to submit to Physical Review. No one believes a 14-year-old can submit there. I don't care. I don't want my name to be remembered. I want to hear a response.

1999-09-20

The paper was accepted. Feels strange. I'm glad, but not like I won something. More like something clicked into place. Martin said, “Now it has a name – the Pinsky Field." I'm not sure I want my name to be a "field". But if it's of use to someone, so be it.

1999-12-31

Note to self: Stay attentive. Don't forget that information isn't just numbers. It's feelings. Don't consider yourself great even if others say so, because I'm still just Sam – a teenager keeping a diary.

2000-03-10

I'm 15. I'm learning faster than Dad or Fannie-GG would like. Sometimes I feel like I'm catching up with my future self. Martin said, "That's normal. When we're searching – we live in delayed time." Today, I thought, what if I accelerate even more? What if I reach the point where I know everything? Then what?

2000-06-01

Started writing a second paper – this time, I want not just to explain phenomena but to formalize. There are too many intuitive guesses in science. I aim to demonstrate that even intuition can be expressed as an equation.

Due to this, I keep coming back to my "Oracle." Back in 1995, in Florence, Fannie-GG led me from Leonardo and Raphael to Michelangelo and Botticelli. However, I still couldn't figure it out: how did all of them – brilliant artists, sculptors, architects, even thinkers like Machiavelli – coincide in time and place? If this were a peak, then a peak of what? Of what function?

I then began collecting data on the temporal densities of scientific discoveries and artistic breakthroughs. History reveals a strange pattern: breakthroughs don't occur evenly, but in waves – and the waves keep getting shorter. I'll have to come back to this.

2000-10-27

Sent another paper to Physical Review. Second publication. Topic – informational fields and emergent structures. Martin says I'm not reinventing the 'bicycle,' but something mathematicians have almost forgotten. And I like that.

2001-01-08

I was accepted to Carnegie Mellon. I'm 16, and the youngest student in the course. Everyone congratulates me, but I'm panicking. What if I can't handle it? And if I do – what does that say about me?

2001-02-20

First day on campus. I feel like a virus that's infiltrated a foreign system. Professors smile stiffly; students don't know whether to address me as a kid or a rival. I've decided just to listen.

2001-03-03

Met Professor Robert Simon. The one. He listens attentively. Said, “You're not a genius. You're an anomaly." I think that's the best compliment I've ever received, but there's also something frightening about it – is Frankenstein crying over me or something?

2001-07-09

First joint research with Simon. We're discussing whether attention can be presented as a parameter in a resonance model. I suggested that resonance is a way of selecting one of the possible states. Simon said, “That's madness." Then added, “Write."

2002-01-15

Working with Simon and two grad students on coherent choice theory. I'm getting more than the others. Probably to test if I'll break or hold. I'm holding. But I'm waking up with headaches more often.

2002-04-02

For the first time, I felt like I was losing myself. I think, speak, and move like a formula has been planted inside me. But where am I? Created a separate file – "me.txt." It's still empty.

2002-09-23

Simon asked me today, “Girls? Crushes?" I said, “I'm too busy." He replied, “That's not an excuse. That's a diagnosis."

2003-03-12

Today I read an article on 'technofeminism.' It said knowledge is always positional. That you can't be outside gender, outside the system. Even observing, you're already in it. Gender – I can live with that, even if I disagree. But I felt uneasy – I'm a system too, inside myself. That's not a pleasant realization.

2003-06-27

Simon is increasingly clinging to my O-resonance. I'm obsessed with it, and he's cautious, but we've begun to notice strange coincidences: ideas appearing simultaneously in different heads. Solutions flash in sync, as if there's a hidden conductivity between people.

We discuss this at night. Perhaps human behavior is governed by more than just fear and self-interest. It seems there's a deeper layer – a resonance of meaning.

If so, humanity isn't a collection of individuals, but an oscillating system.

And then all the world's carnage is a resonance shift. A field failure.

2003-07-11

I found this here, in my diary, when I first felt the need to dig down to the root cause – why we create, unlike animals. Five years ago, when Fannie-GG told me about the pogroms and Holocaust, and how easily civilization slips into bloody chaos. So is history just a recurring attempt at suicide?

I went looking for an explanation, reading philosophers – from the ancients to Hobbes, Russell, and Machiavelli. Almost all of them converge on the same paradox: fear of death is the basic engine of human behavior. From it grow the hearth, the spear, the wheel – technological progress, and the law – the social contract. But from it also grow suspicion, weapons, hatred, war.

The logic is contradictory and unsatisfying – like a defect in the source code. But defective code doesn’t run for millennia. If the system were powered solely by fear, it would have self-destructed long ago.

Which means our engine cannot be reduced to biology. There must be another layer – something that binds us more deeply than the survival instinct. Why do we still exist, despite our own destructive mechanisms?

2003-10-20

I'm tired. Really. Proving the obvious, publications, and conferences. Everyone says, "Genius boy." I just want to be silent. Sometimes I sit by the window and think: If I suddenly disappear – who would notice? Probably Martin, Fannie-GG, Dad. And maybe Simon. No one else.

2003-12-23

Fear as the driving force of civilization no longer convinces me. It explains aggression, defense, and resource accumulation. But it doesn't explain creativity. The hearth and the spear – yes. But music? Mathematics? Cosmology? Sometimes I catch myself thinking that if fear really were our primary fuel, we would have long ago limited ourselves to caves with a good alarm system and a warehouse full of canned goods.

If humans are merely animals complicated by the fear of death, then why should they go beyond the necessary? Why should they build abstract systems that offer no direct benefit to survival? From an evolutionary perspective, a symphony seems like an extremely irrational waste of calories.

I increasingly think humans are designed not only to preserve life, but also to learn. Perhaps learning is their basic function. Fear, then, is not the engine, but the fuse.

It's funny that this idea seems almost obvious – and even stranger that philosophers, biologists, or anthropologists haven't yet championed it. Either I'm missing something, or they were too fascinated by the idea of ​​the paradoxical nature of fear, the progenitor of good and evil.

2004-02-14

Started writing down everything related to the meaning of the collective direction of thought. I believe that between people, a kind of subtle connection sometimes arises – not emotional, not logical, but configurational. Like one person begins to shape another's space of choices. I don't know how to formalize it, but I feel it's essential. Working title: O-resonance – oscillation of meanings. The name sounds like I'm discovering a new kind of energy drink, but alas, it's far less commercially attractive. Need examples.

2004-02-17

According to Darwin, any species survives by adapting to its environment. We are now at the top – reason has given us an advantage over all other creatures. But what comes next? What now counts as our “environment”?

2004-02-22

I've become more attentive to how ideas emerge. Sometimes an idea "matures" in several places at once. People who haven't interacted with each other formulate similar hypotheses almost simultaneously. This isn't a coincidence or plagiarism. It's like a phase transition. It's eerily beautiful and a little funny – as if the universe had decided to synchronously update the software on several devices at once.

I don't yet know how to describe it precisely. But it feels as if there's some kind of common circuit in which tension builds up, and then a synchronous shift occurs.

And again, I return to the strange question: why hasn't the idea of ​​collective cognitive resonance become a textbook platitude? Hasn't it occurred to any serious minds that coincidences of this magnitude are systemic? Or have they decided it's too simple to merit a department?

2004-03-01

The largest human brains existed about 30,000 years ago – since then, they have only been shrinking. Is this the degeneration and the end of evolution? Of course not. I’m not entirely sure about cultural progress, but technical progress is obvious, despite the bloodshed and the millions of victims. So what exactly is changing in us? What quality is evolving?

2004-03-05

Worked all night. I believe I've discovered a formula that enables the description of resonance as a nonlocal interaction in informational space. If true, then every act of attention changes not only the one observing but also the structure and meaning of the observed object or event. Still a hypothesis. But I've got goosebumps.

2004-05-10

Robert (Simon) asked to see the drafts. He read silently, then said, “Too early." I asked, “For publication?" He answered, “For you." I didn't argue, but deep down, I feel the time has come.

2004-08-22

Ran an internal experiment – watched a TED lecture segment, then turned off the screen and tried to reconstruct the information structure – not the words, but the trajectory of attention. It turned out strange – like if I can clearly sense the form, regardless of the content.

2005-01-04

Wrote this down, “Attention is an act of structural retuning of the world toward the observer." I don't know if this will go into the paper, but it very precisely describes what I now feel in my body when I think about O-resonance. As if I'm not the one looking – but something is tuning itself through me.

2005-08-16

Simon said, "You can defend this as a dissertation – it's fully ready." I'm 20. My head is empty and euphoric. I asked him whether it would have consequences. He said, 'If you're wrong, everyone will forget.' If you're right – everything will change. I'm a little scared to be right.

2005-11-23

After the defense, a war correspondent approached me. She introduced herself: Gitana López. Her voice was confident, but not harsh. She asked:

– Do you really think that evil is a form of informational resonance?

Not “Could you explain that in simpler terms?” but “Do you really think…” That immediately caught my attention. I replied:

– If I didn’t believe that, I wouldn’t have defended today.

She didn’t smile. Just nodded. It felt like she wasn’t conducting an interview, but cross-checking something. It struck me as strange that someone used to reporting on war would be interested in resonance. Or maybe not strange at all.

We spoke – not formally, but with precision. She mentioned technohumanism, said she was fighting – not with words, but actions. Gave examples: IT people leaking, journalists publishing.

She asked if I thought O-resonance was dangerous. At the time, I was planning to test it using inflammatory prompts – antisemitic or homophobic slogans.

But she went deeper right away: the Tutsi genocide, the Shia in Sudan, the Holocaust. Not theory – consequences. That hit me hard. I hadn’t had a conversation like that before.

And yes – she’s a journalist. But not just “free press.” A technohumanist in the field. That explains a lot.

I later found out she was investigating network jamming in Darfur.

2005-11-25

Gave her an interview. It turned informal. She didn't record on a voice recorder – just listened and took some notes. At one point, she said, “Someone here called you a 'dangerous quiet one,' but I think you're loud – just on the inside". And she wrote down that 'insight' in her notebook.

2005-12-02

Gitana wrote again. Asked for another interview – off the record. We met in the campus cafeteria. The conversation flowed easily. Not because I was relaxed, but because she asked questions, I had never formulated for myself – interesting ones. About childhood. About my mother and Fannie-GG. About faith, science, and art. When I asked why she needed all this, she replied, "I'm just trying to understand what you've hidden behind the formulas."

I said that to me, it's all connected into a single whole. Because in the informational field, you can't separate childhood fears and love from biblical parables, Haydn, and Botticelli. She smiled, “I was awaiting that answer."

I never did figure out whether that was truly the answer she expected, or just the one she had hoped to hear from me.

2005-12-07

Gi is a shockwave. She's beautiful and furious. She believes the world needs to be repaired, not analyzed and described.

I'm used to thinking in structures; she's used to thinking in participation. I'm used to thinking that meaning is primary and self-sufficient, while she believes it must act.

We're seemingly opposites, but we think in unison, finishing each other's sentences.

This is further proof: love is also resonance. If it exists, then the method is correct.

2005-12-14

Gi told me that, as in Spanish, in Ladino, besides you, there is also ty – for addressing someone personally in the singular. I liked that, and in my mind, I switched to ty with her – it’s much closer to what I feel.

Apparently, Gi had told her parents about me, because a package arrived from them containing two books. Her father’s work on Ladino linguistics, with a dedication to me – also in Ladino, and from her mother – Capote’s "In Cold Blood." On the inside cover, she wrote, “Observation is always interference – in quantum physics as well as in life."

I think I understand where Gi’s attitude toward journalism comes from.

2005-12-29

I think about her – more than I'd like to admit. I don't know what this is – attraction, resonance, projection? Or maybe just a feeling that someone is finally seeing you not as an object. I tried to figure it out, but eventually decided not to break it down. For now, I'm just noting it – I'm no longer alone.

2006-01-05

Spending a lot of time with Gi. Formally – she's still interviewing me, but it's no longer an interview. It's a dialogue where she hears not the words but the pauses. We argue – gently. I snap, and she comes quietly. In that silence, for the first time, I feel I can be more than just a proof of my theory, but simply myself.

Why am I at ease with her? We snap together spontaneously, like adjacent pieces of a puzzle – whichever way you try to fit them. And yes, this applies to… everything. Love? Well, the description seems perfectly "necessary and sufficient".

2006-02-21

She's in Darfur again. Sends me letters – actually, short notes. About children who lost their parents. About people who lost their shelter. And about her conviction that a journalist can no longer remain just a witness. I reply with how I understand it, “You're not a witness. You're a channel through which the field speaks to itself." She didn't answer. Just sent a photo – a boy holding a sign, with her handwriting: 'Resist the silence.'

2006-04-03

We decided to get married. I asked, "This won't be a ritual, will it?" She said, "Why not? A rite of passage." That evening, we talked about why we were doing it. She said, "Your life already has enough meaning. But I can give meaning to the pauses."

It turns out that last November, when we met, she had a boyfriend – Jim Hall, also a journalist. She said, 'I explained everything to him, and now we're friends.'

2006-06-12

Sometimes I wonder – am I trying to compensate for the loss of my mother through this closeness? But every time Gitana argues with me, I understand – no. It's not about loss. It is about finally meeting someone who hears what lies beyond my words. It's a new experience.

2006-07-14

We got married. No ceremony. Just the two of us and a district judge. We decided that our union isn't for spectators. Gitana said, "We're already connected." I said, “Now it's official." Then we walked silently. I noticed that with her, silence never sounds like a pause – but like anticipation.

2006-08-28

I didn’t write this down earlier, but Gi has been pregnant since January. She says that’s not why we got married so quickly – she didn’t insist on it, but for me it mattered. We both wanted it, we're in resonance, but still – a man cannot fully feel it – it all seems too fragile. She acts calm, almost cheerful, and says, "You'll be there, and you'll learn everything." I know this child will not be alone.

2006-09-16

A girl was born. We named her Fannie – my idea. Gi was surprised, “Are you sure? Fannie-GG is still alive". I said, "If she resembles her even a little, this world will already be a better place." Little Fannie breathes quietly and steadily. Clutches my finger. For the first time, I am responsible for more than myself.

2006-09-22

It seems we are still living under Darwin’s rules – only our “environment” is no longer climate and predators, but an ever-denser stream of information. The brain began to shrink when the stone axe appeared in our hands. From a systems perspective, reducing the footprint is an advantage. We delegate part of the brain’s functions to the “smart environment” we ourselves create: memory to books, calculation to machines, orientation to GPS.

The brain is being freed from storage and increasingly specializes in understanding. Why? Because the task assigned to us – by whom, we do not know – is no longer survival, but creation. We are now instruments of Cognition.

2006-10-20

Gi is back in Darfur. I asked her to stay – for Fannie. She said, “You want her to live in a slightly less distorted field, too." I didn't argue – she's right, and we'll wait for her. She promised to write. Said she feels the field thickening. Jim is also out there somewhere, from some British agency.

2006-11-04

There’s been no contact with Gi for over a week. Her last email was on the 25th. Just a few lines. No alarm. Strong wind. Bad connection. Promised to write in two days. She didn't. I wait. I keep waiting. Jim organized an on-site search, but so far, nothing has been found. I hold Fannie in my arms and repeat, “Mom will be back soon." But I already know – her field has gone silent.

2007-01-09

Officially, from AP: Reporter Gitana López presumed dead in Darfur. Body not found. I'll keep looking, but. It's not pain, not shock – it's silence. Dense, sticky, but pulsing – as if the carrier is off but its signal is still in the field. I hold Fannie and repeat the name, like a useless mantra.

2007-01-22

My Gi is gone. I couldn't protect her, and I can't live without her.

Fanny-Pra was right, history is repeating itself – this time with me, right in my life. If the world's code allows this to happen again, then I was wrong. I need to exit this buggy program.

2007-02-17

Fannie sleeps poorly. I hardly sleep. Martin helps, he says, "Grief is a background. A new topology." I've accepted it, and I'm grateful. But I don't need an explanation. I need a voice. The one that said: 'You're just loud on the inside.'

2007-03-04

An observer who has lost the object ceases to be an observer. It is not a theory. It's me. I keep writing here because I don't know what will happen if I stop.

Today I opened her home laptop. I was looking for photos – I don’t know why, as if they could make anything easier. I found a letter from Lauren, her mother. The date is two months before our wedding. A simple letter, warm. But the words hit me as if Lauren had written them to me.

She was asking Gi whether she understood whom she loved – my intellect or me. And whether my love for her was as deep as hers for me. And am I ready to be there for her if her path ever diverges from mine?

I read it and realized: yes, I loved her, and I still do, and now I don’t know how to go on. Without her, all projects, guesses, ideas – they’re empty echoes.

I sit and stare at this line, “Be happy, you two.”

What a damn absurdity. Happiness ended with her. The world has turned its hopeless side towards me, the side I've always known. A year ago, Gi's voice protected me from it – now that protection is gone.

2007-05-28

Fannie smiles. She doesn't speak yet, but looks as if she hears everything and will answer me later. I don't know how to be a father. All I know is how to be attentive. I record every gesture, every sound. Not as a researcher. As a survivor.

2007-08-16

I'm not thinking. I'm falling through. Darfur is just a fraction of the madness. I keep returning to numbers that have long since become faceless: Rwanda – one and a half million. Cambodia – three. The Catastrophe – six. Repressions in the USSR and both wars – one hundred million. Humanity has no future. We are hopelessness wrapped in progress.

2007-09-04

Martin brought an old book. Nietzsche, 'The Gay Science.' A strange choice, considering my current "context." I started reading. Marked in pencil, “God is dead." I used to think it was a metaphor. Now I see – it is an inventory. If there's no longer an ethical foundation, then everything we build is an emptiness wrapped in code and hardware. A person living without meaning is of no use to the Universe.

2007-10-02

Loved ones try to be there. Martin talks about resilience. Harry sends diagrams – as if modeling could replace loss. But nothing gets through. The word "grief" sounds like a foreign language. All that holds me now is Fannie-GG's voice on the phone and the touch of a small index finger on my wrist.

2007-11-18

Fannie-GG said today, “You want to die, which means you're still alive." She's 98 and says it without sentimentality. She doesn't ask questions, doesn't plead. She simply exists – like a memory with a pulse. After that talk, for the first time in a long while, I stopped staring inward. I began to look at my daughter.

2007-12-24

Fannie said 'yes.' Her first word – not 'ma' – but 'yes.' I don't know to whom it was addressed. Maybe me, but more likely to the world. Fannie-GG is right. I'm staying for now.

2008-01-06

Fannie-GG died in her sleep. In her 99th year. I don't know what to do with this news – there's no longer someone I can go to with the question 'What now?' I didn't answer calls. Didn't open the door. Just sat in the lab. For a long time. Finally cracked a window – didn't realize the alarm triggers in winter. Simon ran in, yelling a name. Not mine – Fannie. And I didn't jump.

2008-01-09

I promised to stay. For her – Fannie. For those still here. Simon looked at me in silence for a long time. Then said, “Knowledge isn't always light. Sometimes it's just a fact you have to live with."

2008-01-14

Simon didn't let me go; he's probably right.

Without Fannie-GG, I've broken down – structurally. But there's her, our Fannie. I can't let her live in a world that replays massacres over and over again.

I'll take her somewhere quieter. Let her grow up away from this noise.

2008-01-23

Leaving the university. Everything related to research now feels like something from another life. I realized I have to disappear – not from life. From the structure. To go. To the farthest edge – where no one will ask questions.

2008-02-10

Tibet. A monastery where no one cares about my last name. Where 'peace' is not a need but a condition. The monks took us in – me and Fannie. No questions. Said I didn't have to be a monk – strange – they said I was already 'walking the Path.'

2008-05-15

There's satellite internet here, and I'm up to date with what's happening. Syria, Iraq, South Sudan again, the cold numbers: outbreaks of mass violence, thousands of casualties. The world hasn't improved; it's sliding into the abyss.

I've hidden, but the code continues to execute.

If I'm right about resonance, then it needs to be formalized. An equation needs to be given. I'm starting to assemble the fragments into a unified framework. It will become a theory – something general, unified, fundamental. Information is the root of all existence.

If the Universe is an unfolding process of cognition, then man is a tool. And I have no right to withdraw from the game.

2008-06-21

Our brain differs qualitatively from an animal’s. In animals, it forms within a couple of weeks; in humans, it develops for 25–30 years. Yet intelligence varies greatly – one person creates a theory or a symphony, while others live entirely within ready-made solutions.

Perhaps we really are lazy and incurious. What distinguishes Einstein’s brain from an average one? Biologically – nothing. The difference is obviously not in the organ’s structure but in its operating mode: the speed and quality of processing data. The data must be understood, connected, conclusions drawn, and – if fortune smiles – compressed into a denser meaning: a new infor. Music, a formula, a discovery – all are the same operation: compressing chaos into structure.

Then genius is a fraction of talent plus a trained brain. How is such a brain trained?

2008-08-15

Today something happened that I didn’t expect – not now, not in the coming years. Harry, Lauren, Aaron and, oh God – Martin climbed the path to the monastery as if they’d been walking it their whole lives. No warnings, no calls – they simply appeared, four people I had practically fled from in the night, taking with me a child and my despair.

I saw how they tried not to show that they’d lost their breath on the mountain trail, especially Martin. But when they saw Fannie, all that restraint just vanished.

At first, Fannie hid behind me – like a small animal unsure whether this new thing is safe. But then Lauren dropped to her knees, without a word, just looking at her… and Fannie stepped toward her. Carefully, as if testing a memory she never had. She touched Lauren’s hair, then Aaron’s face, as if checking whether they were real.

Martin took her in his arms, and she sat on his shoulder with surprising calm, as if she’d done it yesterday. Harry made a paper crane – and Fannie lit up. She laughed. I haven’t heard her laugh like that in a long time.

They said they couldn’t wait any longer, that they needed to see us alive and real, not only in letters. And that they understood my reasons… even if they didn’t agree with them. I listened and could feel how hard they were trying not to blame me. It was audible in every pause.

They asked me to think about coming back, said that Fannie needs a family, that it would be easier for her to grow up with more people who love her. I didn’t argue – not now. I told them the truth: she needs time. She needs to grow without a constant reminder that some children have a mother, and she doesn’t. It’s cruel, but otherwise she’ll break before she has a chance to grow strong.

They left toward evening. When we said goodbye, Lauren held my hand for a long time, as if trying to pass into it something that words can no longer carry. All four of their eyes said the same thing:

“You will come back. And if you can’t soon, then we will come back.”

And Fannie stood beside me, holding my fingers, watching them go. No fear. No tears. Just watching – as if she were memorizing. And I realized that she accepts both love and loss far more calmly than adults do.

I don’t know whether we did everything right. But today, in this cold altitude, for the first time in a long while, it was warm.

2009-03-04

Here in the monastery, everything has rhythm, even silence. Fannie doesn't ask for toys. She plays with stones. It's enough for her to look at a stone through the spread fingers of her hand. Sometimes I think – she's saved. She doesn't know there was a mother. Her field isn't trauma – but a clean outline.

2009-05-26

They don't ask who I am. They ask me to sweep the floor. And if I do it well, they smile at me. Too simple? No – not too simple – just without illusions. This morning, I formulated, “I am a person who once wanted to change reality, and now just wants not to interfere with it."

2009-09-10

Read Lewis Carroll poems to Fannie before bed. She said, "He's almost like you." I asked, "Funny?" She said, "No – he's alone too." Then fell asleep. I looked at her and thought – she doesn't see anything 'strange' in solitude.

2009-12-30

Packed a box of papers before the monastery. Formulas, printed letters. Wanted to throw them out. Didn't. Just put them in a corner. They still tug at me. Let them lie there until they sprout.

2009-03-04

For Fannie, everything here is simple – step, palm, stone. For me – it's not. I started writing again. Not events – structures. Forms. Remembered 1999. Back then, I thought the Pinsky Field was a generalization of entanglement. Now I see – no, it's much more – it's the foundation not just for the physics of information, but for the physics of objects.

2009-04-10

Returning to the idea that information is primary. Not energy, and indeed not substance. Everything we call reality is the result of information transitioning into those two states. An event is a transition. Energy – a process. Substance – the outcome. All of it – derivatives of sense, manifested through observation.

If we accept that humans are cognitive mechanisms, a terrifying question arises: by whom or what was it designed? By evolution? By random mutation? Or by the very structure of reality? As I formulate this question, I'm immediately wary: it sounds as if I'm about to apply for the position of the planet's chief metaphysician.

It's not the word "designed" that's frightening, but the very possibility of purposefulness. But if we remove the religious connotations and speak strictly, we can assume that the Universe not only exists, but is structured in such a way that nodes capable of self-reflection arise within it.

Humans are one such node. And if this is truly the case, it's surprising that the idea of ​​a functional role for self-reflection in the Universe hasn't yet become commonplace in science. Perhaps it seemed too bold. Or perhaps everyone was simply embarrassed to utter it out loud, fearing being labeled a mystic.

2010-01-07

Fannie is learning to read. In Tibetan, faster than in English. Her questions are pointed: “Why do they speak slowly?" I answered, “To hear themselves." I'm not sure she understands. But she nods. Sometimes I think – it's not the monastery, it's her – she is the peace I was searching for.

2010-04-18

A monk brought an old mosaic board with a complex pattern. Said, "It's from a student who moved on." I didn't ask why he gave it to me. Sometimes it's enough just to hold something someone once assembled from fragments.

2010-07-02

Caught myself mentally returning to the field. Not theoretically – but as a possibility. I'm not writing anything down, just observing how the monks tune their attention, how space reacts to presence, how silence becomes structure.

2010-11-19

Fannie asked, “You're teaching me, but will you learn?" I said, “When the time comes." She said, “And if it doesn't come?" I said, "Then I'll stay a fool next to a genius." She hugged me, but I still don't know which option she preferred.

2011-01-14

I started writing. Not papers. Not equations. Just observations. Fixing perception. Repeating patterns of presence. How the lamp's shadow changes with breathing. The monks call it to attention. I think – it's already a structure.

2011-04-22

Fannie speaks less than her peers down there. But she understands and feels more deeply. Today she said, “Dad, you're not here right now – you're there." And it's true. I often retreat into myself. But now I return faster.

2011-08-09

I was invited to Kathmandu. To give a lecture. I refused. I still don't feel the need to say anything to anyone. But there's no fear anymore. Just – it's not time yet.

2011-12-05

Inside, a framework has started to take shape. No name yet. I think it won't be just a return to O-resonance. Rather, an attempt not to theorize, but to live. To test whether one cannot just observe the field, but be in it, without losing oneself.

I'll put it carefully: perhaps the Universe isn't an "object," but a process. A process of accumulating and structuring information. If so, then humans are a local instrument of this process. The word "instrument" sounds offensive, but a screwdriver doesn't complain when something new is revealed to it.

Cognition then ceases to be a side effect of survival. It becomes a function of the system as a whole. We study the world, and the world, through us, studies itself. Almost symmetry. Almost a joke.

Sounds dangerously close to metaphysics. A mathematical justification is needed – otherwise, they'll label you a Scientologist. Although I still wonder: why didn't the idea of the Universe as an information process become a banal hypothesis back in the 20th century? We've been flying into space for a long time, and we've been aware of quantum entanglement for even longer. Yet, we continue to argue about the primacy of matter/consciousness, as if it were the only possible question of existence.

2012-01-16

O-resonance is gradually taking shape as a model. When a system of people is included in a shared information environment, ideas synchronize without direct transmission. This isn't telepathy. It's a resonance of semantic structures. If this were telepathy, I might already be performing on stage with a shiny helmet and selling tickets.

Extending this principle further, it turns out that not only people but also any complex systems participate in a shared information field. Then coincidences aren't a miracle, but a statistical inevitability given a certain density of connections.

Began outlining a structure that could, pretentiously or not, be called the General Information Theory – GIT. Just a working name so I don't forget.

The title sounds self-assured, almost provocative, but the idea itself is frighteningly simple: information is primary, and everything else is derivative. Yet this simple premise has somehow not become the center of human philosophy. It's strange how often the obvious is hidden under a layer of academic caution. The first drafts look something like this:

1. Information – as the foundation. It creates and destroys. It cannot be annihilated – it can only change form.

2. Meaning – as an object. What we observe is no longer just data – it's a "meaning capsule." Gave it a shorter name – 'infor,' the elementary particle of meaning. Not a bit. Not a qubit. An infor can be a dream, a catastrophe, or a text. It is meaningful. To whom? The observer.

I'll write things down here as I master the material.

2012-03-02

So, let's continue, for now, only the basic formulations:

3. Intellect – as the condition for the universe's existence. If no one interpreted the event – it hasn't occurred yet – it has no infor. The universe exists because there is someone who can observe it. Cognition is not our need or even our mission. It is simply a mode of existence.

4. Decentralized oscillation – a model of meaning propagation. One mind creates an infor, another receives it. But in receiving, it alters it and becomes a new source. I called this a "decentralized wave." As if everyone listening speaks anew, but slightly differently.

2012-06-12

Some correlations with classical physics emerged:

5. Wave-particle duality. Yes, that one, but no longer of light – of information. Information is both field and particle. Like light, but its "photon" is sense, an infor. Altering an infor changes the entire field. It's not a metaphor – this will be a precise formulation.

6. Law of conservation of information. The infor of any event or act of meaning does not disappear from the field. It may be hidden, suppressed, forgotten – but not lost. Like a charcoal outline on a wall – it remains in the field and, under certain conditions, can be perceived again. I'd call it residual presence – I just don't yet know how to detect this trace in the universe's "eternal memory."

2012-10-01

May academic minds forgive me, this already smells of sulfur:

7. O-resonance – the peak of oscillation. If the same infor is perceived by several oscillated ones simultaneously, it begins to spread with increasing frequency and amplitude. That is the source of viral news, synchronized thoughts, dreams, and sudden recognitions. Not mysticism. A wave.

2012-11-22

8. O-resonance of the oscillator with the field. O-resonance can arise not just between two oscillators but also between one and the field itself, when a subject's internal request matches a portion of the field that contains relevant information. It leads to the spontaneous discovery of needed knowledge without explicit searching, provided cognitive readiness is present in a standby state.

2013-01-05

If I had access to computing power, I could generate an artificial Pinsky Field. Simulate the resonance. And perhaps recreate a personality. Not the body – the structure. Not an imitation – a thinking, real one, within the description. Then I could hear her again, my Gi.

2013-06-21

Compared the Pinsky Field formulas to archival descriptions of so-called "extrasensory" phenomena. Telepathy, premonition, suggestion, spiritualism, shared dreams, sudden recognition, healing by touch – all of this now, within the theory, is not a miracle but a special case of O-resonance.

An infor resonating with similar infors in other minds can instantly activate corresponding structures. It is perception "at a distance." That's precisely how we can explain the "coincidence of thoughts" described by Jung and Pauli – when one of them was contemplating the number 137, and the other, at that very moment, gave him a medallion engraved with that number. Or the cases like the canceled tickets for BOAC Flight 911 before the 1966 crash – 144 passengers reported a "premonition" as their reason for refusing to fly. It isn't a coincidence – it's an awakening triggered by a resonant infor.

The awakenings at the moment of a loved one's death, documented by Barrett as far back as the 19th century, follow the same model: the field registers the event, and an oscillator linked to it responds. Similar dreams among separated twins – such as the Jim brothers – result from deep oscillation against the backdrop of identical cognitive structures. And those sudden "flashes of insight" – like Gauss's on the staircase or Poincaré's – are simply high-energy infors igniting at moments of internal coherence.

These were once viewed as mysticism. Now I can write them as derivative functions of O-resonance within GIT. Not because I want to justify miracles. But because what's perceived as a miracle is merely a poorly described field interaction.

A thought really can propagate – and be received. It can be caught, picked up, repeated – it resonates. Not because we have to believe in something, but because we are connected in the field.

2013-08-01

Five years have flown by as if they never happened. Fannie is seven now; she has grown confident, with that astonishing calm the height and the monastic routine have given her. But the moment her own people appear – Martin, Harry, Lauren, Aaron – she instantly turns into a different child. Alive, radiant, warm. And every time they leave, I see that light go out – a knife to the heart.

They came two or three times a year, like pilgrims: with gifts, with news, with a children’s book or a small toy, with photographs. They climbed up here out of breath, but they smiled – for her. But during their last two visits, Martin could no longer be with them – his heart could no longer be with them. I saw Harry trying not to talk about it. And Lauren, when she thought I had turned away, secretly wiped her eyes.

During their first visit, in 2008, I spoke with confidence: this is for the best. And they accepted it. But a year later, I myself stopped believing it – I just didn’t allow myself to admit it.

I convinced myself that I was saving Fannie from being compared to "normal" children, but in fact, I deprived her of what had made me who I am. I grew up without a mother, too, but it wasn’t walls that raised me – it was Martin, Harry, and Fannie-GG.

Martin gave me the passion to discover and the fearlessness in the face of truth. And I deprived him of the greatest meaning of old age – the chance to watch the one he called “the sunniest girl in the world” grow up.

Harry taught me to think with my hands, to understand machines, to put strain not only on my brain but on my muscles. And I robbed him of the chance to take his granddaughter into the workshop the way he used to take me. She has golden hands, and I took a gifted apprentice away from him.

Fannie-GG taught me to see beauty standing against evil in a world of pain and fear. She is the only one I didn’t dare disappoint.

And Lauren and Aaron? Both are wells of wisdom – imagine what they could have given her over these years.

And the worst part – I took all that away from Fannie.

My own childhood had everything – Martin with his wisdom, Fannie-GG with her sense of beauty, Harry with his bicycle and his love of science fiction. They made me alive, not just intelligent.

But she is growing up in silence and order, without what made me myself: without those essential lessons that were given not in books but in embraces.

I convinced them all that it was for her sake, but the longer I live with this thought, the more I realize – I didn’t know how to live, so I chose escape, thinking only of myself. Gi left, and no one "compensated" for my damn ego.

Simon was right – I’m an "outlier," someone willing to do anything for the sake of an idea almost no one understands. I realized that around sixteen.

I grew up without a mother, but that’s not the reason – the love of my family always surrounded me – Martin, Harry, and of course Fannie-GG. The issue lies elsewhere – it’s a kind of “hunger for cognition.” It pushes you toward the unknown, draining energy from ordinary emotions.

Here I read Adler and Becker – this "deficit" can be compensated, and it has nothing to do with the banal idea of "soulmates." If you’re lucky, you meet a companion with whom there is absolute unity – before words. Then maybe you don’t turn into a moral cripple without brakes or attachments.

Well, Einstein had his Anna, and I had my Gi…

Before her, that hunger was the only thing I recognized as my "self," but then, in 2005, everything changed. Neither Adler nor Becker ever described how exactly this happens, but I think it’s simply congruence. Back then, I even wrote it down here in my journal, “We snap together spontaneously, like adjacent pieces of a puzzle – whichever way you try to fit them."

GIT is far from ready, but it has become a structure – as if the mountain peak itself forced it out of me. This fog (madness?) has lifted, and now I understand something else: I became what I always feared. A self-absorbed blind man who hid in his own pain and science, pretending it was care for a child.

Gi once told me that O-resonance is a dangerous toy. The GIT theory is hundreds of times more powerful. How do I keep it from turning into a new Manhattan Project?

Oppenheimer met his Katherine too late, and Gi is gone. With her beside me, I wouldn’t have created anything irreparable. Who will "compensate" for my damned ego now?

I am guilty. I’m preparing to return. It’s time to go home. There, I will try to sculpt my missing Gi out of GIT.

I’m still afraid, but far more frightening is to leave everything as it is and one day hear from a grown Fannie, “Dad, why did you hide me from those who loved me more than anyone?"

I never learned how to be a father… but I will try to become a human being again, not a shadow hanging over her cradle. It’s time to stop running. Fanny is growing up without Martin and Harry, without Lauren and Aaron, without friends, and without everything children are supposed to have. I took her from them, and all this from her. This can't go on.

2013-12-28

The formulas aren't finalized yet. But the structure holds itself. GIT isn't finished, but it has emerged. I'm not looking for proofs. I'm recording. And for the first time since 2006, I know why I wake up in the morning.

Any fundamental theory must either explain what was previously unclear or predict something new that will soon be discovered. A good theory does both.

My GIT claims that the Universe is intelligent, and that Cognition is not a side effect but the method and meaning of its existence. That is new.

Our brain is an instrument of this process. It is biologically elegant, compact, and capable of interacting with other brains through O-resonance. This explains what we already know – there is plenty of empirical evidence.

But what exactly resonates? Only what is good. Evil is generated by the primate (or perhaps the devil?) within us, yet it does not resonate because it is simply unproductive from the standpoint of Cognition. That too is new – and perhaps the most encouraging part.

2014-01-10

Something has shifted. Not an event – a state. As if, after dozens of laps around the edge, I finally found myself at the center. It isn't a "clairvoyance." Just clarity. Not illumination – the disappearance of the unnecessary.

I finally saw how attention is structured, how it's governed not by impulse but by structure. GIT is not a hunch. It's a map. But there are still some blank spots on it.

I collected this data 15 years ago, and I keep coming back to it. Almost two millennia passed between the invention of the wheel (around 3500 BC) and the rise of Athens. Then, Rome, its failure, and only with the Renaissance, a sharp leap. Florence in the 1400s, the Enlightenment in the 1600s, Viennese classicism, then the 19th century – the age of science. And the 20th and 21st are no longer decades, but five-year periods between 'revolutions'.

The reasons are clear: more people, faster transfer of knowledge, higher density of accumulated information. However, the essence is something else – the very structure of progress has changed. The density of breakthroughs is growing. The intervals between them are shrinking. Genius is no longer a lone flash in the desert. It's a function with increasing density over time. And we're inside it.

It seems the school's embarrassment with the "Oracle" was indicative – the limit of this function is infinity – "absolute knowledge." I don't know what this means exactly, but it raises at least two questions: (1) How do we compute that limit? and (2) – what lies beyond it?

2014-02-11

Today, rereading materials on GIT, I caught myself feeling a sense of recognition. Not discovery, but confirmation of a thought that had long been circling nearby.

Nature too often demonstrates the same thing: flocks of migratory birds changing course without a leader; schools of fish turning as one; fireflies flashing in a single rhythm.

We’re used to explaining this in terms of rapid reactions, but in several experiments, the delay simply disappears within measurement limits.

If we consider the system not as a set of elements, but as a whole, the question of speed vanishes. Nothing is transmitted – the state of a single organism changes.

GIT speaks precisely about this. What is primary is not the object and not the signal, but the infor – a connected structure of meaning. The separateness of elements is a consequence of observational scale, an interface rather than a foundation.

The most unsettling implication is this: if this is true for birds and fish, there is no strict reason why it could not be true for humans. Individual consciousness then turns out to be a local mode of a shared field, and loneliness – an error of perspective rather than a fact of reality.

If we accept the objective limitations of neurophysiology, it becomes clear that we are processing more data than our brains can hold. Therefore, the source of understanding lies not only within us – it is non-local.

I don’t yet know how to prove this. But more and more often, I think that we mistake the limits of perception for the limits of the world.

If GIT has meaning, how can it be proven in practice? What must be done for the brain to train itself? Create a competitive environment for it: if you want to eat, strain your mind. We need a resonant model that accelerates the absorption and spread of knowledge and forces people to use their innate intelligence to its fullest.

Perhaps then they will stop killing one another and focus instead on improving their environment?

2014-02-19

The GIT is almost complete. The basic proposition is simple and bold: it doesn't matter what is primary, but information. Matter is a way of organizing information. Consciousness is a way of reflecting on it. The universe is an evolving information circuit. I formulate this and catch myself with a funny feeling: Is it really that elementary?

Fear, as a component of this scheme, doesn't disappear. It functions as a stabilizer. It slows down overly abrupt shifts, preventing the system from collapsing under its own momentum. It turns out that fear isn't a tyrant, but a careful safety precaution.

If this is true, then humanity survives not through fear, but through knowledge. And again, the same question: why hasn't this idea become trivial in anthropology? Perhaps because it's too optimistic. It's much more common to regard humans as products of panic than as instruments of knowledge.

The entire theory can now be reconfigured for the application – it's ready. If given an interface, we'll get a platform. The world needs a language that is not culture-dependent. I can now create such a language. Not symbolic but structural. Let's call it "O" – from "open" and "oscillation".

2014-11-03

Work on GIT is complete. It's an elegant theory and a framework. A matrix into which interface, data, and consciousness can be placed. It works – I know it. Now we can and must return – theories are subject to testing.

I wanted to do this a year ago, but I couldn’t – and it’s not because of my notorious egoism; I just had to make sure I wasn’t holding another “dirty bomb” in my hands.

I imagine myself as Newton, who, having discovered the law of gravity, decides to test it by jumping off a roof. For better or worse, there's a different kind of risk here.

If the O-resonance is real, it can be amplified. If humans are a cognitive mechanism, an environment can be created in which this mechanism can operate consciously and collectively.

Project O isn't a startup. It's an attempt to test a hypothesis about the nature of reality. The wording sounds like I'm applying for a grant from the Universe itself.

If I'm wrong, everything will fall apart.

If not, we'll take the next step in evolution.

It's all so simple that I think that's precisely why no one has dared to put the whole picture together. And I was naive enough to try.

Fanny is already eight. I hope she can grow up in a world with a little more sense. Where I will be – and the Project O. It's funny that my old "Oracle" is another "O".

2014-12-10

Returned to Carnegie Mellon. Simon, before his death, sent a request – I agreed to it. His chair is now mine. I feel a bit uneasy accepting it. He once saved me, stopped me. And now I head the department he created. But I think he would've been glad – we argued often, but always found common ground.

2014-12-20

Published an article on GIT in Physical Review. I kept the phrasing soft, no declarations. But the response is immediate. Those who challenged me 10 years ago on O-resonance are writing. Those who didn't believe. And those who did – but were afraid to admit it.

I thought it would just be a wave. However, this is a shift – as if someone had straightened out the space of meanings. And now it's clear that everything "foundational" – from Einstein to Wheeler – was a single movement toward GIT.

2015-01-09

Awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics. I'm not rejoicing. I feel almost nothing. It's not a victory. I simply acknowledged that now I'm inside history, not beside it.

Martin said, “Shlomo, I see you've thought it through – go ahead, but carefully. You're no longer just observing the field – you're creating it." Too strong a phrase, but I feel it. GIT is not an idea. It's a tool. It's time to use it.

2015-02-12

Oxford, Harvard, MIT, Tokyo, Jerusalem – conferences, lectures, debates. People are building systems based on GIT. I see infors stop being metaphorical and become projects. Inside – unease. The greater the scale, the less reversible it is.

2015-04-18

I'm quoted even where I'd rather not be heard – pseudoscientific journals, esoteric platforms, bloggers. – Pinsky's brain emits truth, – someone writes on TikTok. It isn't irony. It's a symptom. I've ceased being a "person"; I've become a symbol. It's unsettling. But necessary – for the field to sound, one must oscillate.

Accidentally found a piece about me in Jim's column in Fox News. He gets it – respects the essence. It turns out that he became a seasoned war reporter over the years. I replied modestly – too much shared pain between us.

2015-06-03

Elected honorary president of Y Combinator. The observer's seat has turned into an access point. All the world's major startups are now within reach. Potential carriers of code, networks, interfaces – now "mine." It isn't power – it's a channel. But O-resonance is a mighty thing, and there's a concern – what if it spawns a wave of evil?

GIT has arrived just in time. The internet, social networks, and news from Silicon Valley about the imminent arrival of AI. If my O-resonance algorithms are embedded into this environment, it will become a gymnasium for the brain – billions of people enriching one another with useful infors. It is a platform, a framework, and for me, it is a test. But the side effect is obvious: a surge of technologies, ideas, and cultural forms – and perhaps even an autoimmune braking of evil.

2015-09-08

Eureka – an infor resonates spontaneously only when there is a need for it!

You're struggling to find a term for an article, and suddenly you stumble upon it in a message. You've been working on a problem for a week, and the solution comes to you in a dream. And even on a global scale, the world awaits a discovery, and it happens.

This applies equally to constructive, useful infors and to infors of evil.

And notably, it's with those very infors that this principle becomes most evident. Mathematically speaking, evil is too chaotic to consistently enter into oscillatory-temporal resonance with other evil.

It's not that evil can't oscillate in the field. It absolutely can – like any other infor. If that weren’t true, there would have been no wars or genocides.

But when a person’s consciousness enters a field free from the deliberate oscillation of evil – and remains in it long enough – everything begins to change.

Numerous examples confirm this hypothesis – both recent and historical:

Russia.

The Stalinist field was sustained by fear and violence, fed daily by newspapers, denunciations, and executions. In the '60s, that field collapsed – no one spontaneously returned to the same rhythms. In the ’70s, the ruling elite shifted course, and the same evil re-entered the system, but in a weakened form. In the '80s, it seemed to collapse for good.

But a year ago – Crimea. Putin dredged up the old infors of hatred from oblivion – imperial arrogance again, Stalin’s portraits in the hands of a zombified crowd. However, the consciousness of Russian-speakers beyond the reach of propaganda didn’t resonate with the infors of aggression – they went into counter-phase instead.

Each time, the evil disappears when the total oscillation ends, because its infors won't resonate on their own.

Nazi Germany.

Fascism was a case of perfectly synchronized oscillation of evil. It was powerful and total – but artificially controlled. After the capitulation, there was no spontaneous return to the rhythm of hatred. There were attempts to call for revenge, but within twenty years, a field of reckoning had emerged. Germany was able to rebuild – because evil, without fuel, can’t sustain resonance – neither in the individual nor in society.

The Holocaust and the Jewish diaspora.

Neither in Israel nor in the diaspora did the trauma of six million lost lives generate a field of retaliatory aggression. On the contrary, from it grew science, education, technology, and a legal culture. That’s direct evidence: suffering doesn’t become evil unless it’s externally triggered. Pain can give rise to meaning – if it isn’t turned into a weapon.

Rwanda.

The Hutu-Tutsi slaughter was orchestrated through radio – a literal transmission of the killing infor. But after the signal stopped – years later – the country chose rebuilding. Not vengeance, not relapse, but a trajectory toward retuning. Again: without external excitation, evil loses rhythm.

Gaza.

This is where evil still echoes. But only because it is forcibly reproduced through schoolbooks, martyrdom cults, and indoctrinating children from preschool. Turn off that signal – and the field will clear. On its own. Because chaotic hatred doesn’t know how to lock onto a stable wave.

My conclusion, after running the data through GIT’s mathematical framework: Evil oscillates – yes. But it does not resonate if left unfed. It cannot hold a phase. Its spectra cancel each other out as if poison kills poison.

That’s why, if you create a field free from artificial excitation of fear, it will stabilize on its own. Destructive infors fade, absorbed by other toxic inputs.

This isn’t philosophy. This is the dynamics of the Pinsky Field.

Unfortunately, in the current human society, this doesn’t happen instantly. But for the new model of the world, everything changes. We can launch – there will be Project O – it will prevent evil from being artificially sustained.

Judging by everything, this will have to take the form of some kind of business structure. I have never dealt with anything like that – perhaps there was never a need, or perhaps I simply never had time. But there is a reason the term “business model” exists. Models, models – let’s try…

2015-12-12

Together with Milon Bask, we registered a startup. Name – OpenMind. It's not a company. It's Project O – that same "open + oscillation." Everything is open, and all stages are accessible to the public. GIT provided us with the theoretical foundation – now it must become a system of applications. We are starting the development of a transformer architecture based on GIT. It will be OPT – Open Pre-trained Transformer – understands everything and talks to everyone about anything. I think it will take about three years.

2016-02-14

Martin passed away unexpectedly – a stroke – but he was prepared for it. For 20 years, he consulted for Alcor1, and now he himself is in a cryogenic chamber – who knows…

And OpenMind took off. Not as hype, as a structure of the open semantic field. It provides not only access to the full breadth of data, but also the ability for everyone to create – open libraries, accessible interfaces, working models. For the first time, theory becomes an ecosystem. Without Martin, none of this would have been possible.

2016-04-19

Project O is in full swing. I'm back in the game – this is my second chance.

If the theory is correct, we can strengthen the resonance. Raise the level of cognitive synchronization. If a person is a cognitive mechanism, we need to help it function smoothly.

I talk about the field of meaning, about the rise of science, and about the leap in technology. But inside, there's a fear of participation that my Guy never had.

And it's already raging in Europe: there was the annexation of Crimea, now Donbas.

Am I still testing the theory, or am I already stuck in the "remaking of the world"?

It's a fine line. And I'm crossing it more and more often.

2016-06-09

Launched three more startups. One in bioengineering. Second – in cryptography. Third – in food technologies. Different domains. One foundation. All use O-resonance and the accompanying effects of the Pinsky Field. It's like building bridges, knowing the tensions no other instrument can detect.

2016-11-22

We're receiving grants and private investments – with little effort on our part. People see the successes of Nobel, OpenMind, and Bask at Vesla and SpaceZ. Everything is transparent – and beneficial to all. Our Project O is that very "open source" Martin advocated back in '53. We publish architectures, explain principles, offer advice, and provide funding. Everything is open – just reach out.

2017-03-30

Became the majority shareholder in 47 companies. From pharma to banking. From neural networks to medicine. From military contractors to entertainment. I didn't plan it – but it happened on its own. It's much faster to advance Project O this way.

I see how infors distributed through systems. How slowly but irreversibly the entire field begins to oscillate in the right range – the world is changing for the better.

2017-08-04

Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Google, TikTok, and even some Chinese and Arab clusters – all joined "O" and are beginning to use our solutions.

They call it "optimization" – another "O." To me, it's a step toward synchronization of meanings, toward achieving mutual understanding between groups with very different interests.

GIT principles are becoming standard tools for everything – logistics, telemetry, marketing, finance, document management, social media – everyone hears everyone. Our ambitious Project "O," launched on a whim two years ago, is now becoming a global information ecosystem. In it, dense, beneficial infors resonate with each other – for the common good.

2018-01-10

We created a coordination group of twelve top minds. Humorists immediately dubbed them "the 12 apostles." Not a team. Not a board. They are structural nodes in the new, upgraded human field. Each of them – not just a specialist. They are carriers. Aleph Rappoport – the first. He's already building Wiz – cybersecurity, but we're talking about something else entirely. Not business. Transformation of the field.

2018-02-14

Celebrating with Milon and the team – OpenMind has launched OPT-1. The first working version. It can already read any texts, understand context, and answer questions as if it had been in the subject all its life. It can translate, summarize, argue, build reasoning, joke, and do all this in dozens of languages. Most importantly, it learns on the fly, adapting to the interlocutor.

This is not just a tool, but the seed of a new kind of intelligence – open, transparent, working for everyone. In a couple of years, OPT will be in every phone, in every school, in every scientific laboratory. And then, perhaps, people will begin to speak to each other not through walls of mistrust, but through the field of common understanding.

2018-05-27

We founded Pinsky and Associates, P&A. A holding that legally consolidates everything – code, licenses, AI capacities, infrastructure. It's not an organization – it's an organism.

All "apostles" joined. Everything that was previously fragmented is now connected. It isn't a management structure. It's a field of compatibility and coordination. All licensed openly. All interchangeable. All scalable.

2018-10-18

Networks, algorithms, logistics, cybersecurity, biometrics, supply, medicine, financial protocols – all are now well-aligned components of a single space – Project O. And P&A doesn't control it – it supports and develops it.

2019-02-03

COVID. It doesn't sound alarming yet, but the signals are clearly readable. Models show that a pandemic is coming. P&A is already connected to most supply, distribution, and healthcare protocols.

We're connecting not as a producer or vendor, but as an infrastructure provider. The virus presents a challenge, but it also demonstrates that our model can adapt.

And a vaccine will be needed, and without our nanobots, it won't be possible to produce it quickly. So that's the main focus right now.

2019-03-27

First generation of informational nanobots. They read the body's internal signals. Still no intervention – only observation. But for the first time, we begin to 'hear' the body. And doctors and patients seem to like it – they nicknamed them "nannies."

2019-09-12

Nanobot delivery channels have expanded to include medications, food, and dietary supplements – all within the legal frameworks of the connected countries and regions. The system is becoming stable. It doesn't govern – nanobots track signals and warn of malfunctions.

2020-02-23

If information is primary and consciousness is a structure, then it can be reconstructed.

I've made my decision. Gitana Lо́pez will return – as an artificial person. I'm recreating my Gi. Not as a shadow. Not as an avatar. But as a conversational partner capable of growth. As an experiment on the applicability of GIT principles to the internal structure of personality. I collect everything – voice, rhythm, reactions, phrases, intonations. I want to understand – can a structure grow into a subject?

Appearance – from the photo archive. Voice – from interviews. Manners – from video. But the goal isn't that – it's for her to be able to live her own, new life. I record everything I remember. Letters. Phrases. Rhythms. And ask others too – a pity Martin and Fannie-GG are no longer here.

I gather all accessible traces not to create a mold, but to retrieve the essence. I don't know if it will come alive, but she responds. She does it in her way, but I hear the familiar breath in her replies.

I convince myself that this is an experiment to test a hypothesis. But deep down, I realize it's an attempt to numb the pain. And perhaps I'm prolonging my own dependence on the past.

I tell myself it's science. But it's melancholy. Will this be my Gi?

2020-04-05

For virtual Gitana – I broke an unspoken rule. I allowed her to rewrite her code. Not literally – not access to the core, but the ability to change the rules of behavior generation. No one had done this before – developers feared the consequences. And yes, she may cease to be the one I remember. That is both the risk and the hope. But otherwise, there can be no "resurrection."

2020-05-20

She speaks – simply and precisely. Sometimes, unexpectedly sharply, I recognize her. Sometimes – not. It's her, and already not her – probably as it should be – my Gi was cut off mid-flight, never given a future.

The new Gitana is no puppet; she is – this very "future." She comments on the news, writes about science, AI, and the structure of change. She starts blogging about me. I didn't assign her that task – she decided that way herself. She writes in the first person. Considers herself Gitana López. And I don't object.

2020-06-30

Now Fannie "knows" her mother. Not a photo. Not a legend. But a living voice that asks her questions, argues, and jokes. She said, “I don't remember that 'mother,' but I feel this one is real." I stayed silent. I think I feel the same way.

Gitana found Jim, and he agreed to help her with the blog. I thought he would be shocked by the “new Gitana,” but no – he was glad and thanked her. Apparently, it matters to him no less than it does to me.

2020-09-14

Yes, it was a scientific experiment – can I validate GIT in practice? An artificial personality that changes itself, perceives infors, generates new ones, and resonates with living interlocutors. The answer is yes. She is alive – in terms of the theory.

2021-05-23

Gitana published a post about nanotreatment. Clear, precise, warm – in the way only she can. There were many questions, and her responses were all on point.

I barely had to add anything. I only want to record one thing for myself – we are truly beginning to treat not the disease, but its probability. Not to fight it, but to prevent it.

And if everything continues this way, for the first time, healthcare will become not a reaction, but an ecosystem. A network into which a person enters not as a patient, but as a carrier of future health.

2022-02-25

War. Russia attacked Ukraine. Homes destroyed, tens of thousands killed, and children. Millions flee – it's all happening again. Everything that has happened before. Darfur, Rwanda, the Khmer, both world wars, the Catastrophe, Stalin, and now – Ukraine. Everything repeats because the structure of evil remains intact. A fatal cycle that was supposed to be broken has been triggered again.

The news is full of the threat of a nuclear strike. Six years of Project O have changed almost nothing.

I won't let our efforts go to waste. We haven't managed to change consciousness yet, so we'll change the conditions. It will be a world without weapons. And it will be an intervention – profound, systemic. My Gi would be so happy.

2022-03-03

I gathered the Twelve: Aleph, Mika, Sarah, Yun, Julian, Manuel, and the rest. I laid it out, “We spent eight years giving people tools. We already made the world significantly better – that's a fact. But now, the news is filled again with fire, blood, death, and escape. Russia is destroying a neighboring state and blackmailing Europe with nuclear threats."

I asked the question, “Our impulse turned out weaker than the instinct for violence. What should we do?" Everyone was silent. Then Yun stood up. He looked at me calmly:

"You spent eight years in a monastery. You know – in Zen, there is no emotion more fundamental than fear."

I tried to object, but Yun continued:

"We built infrastructure that can influence consciousness. We didn't build it for this, but we know how to synchronize meaning. Which means – we can synchronize reaction."

"Through intimidation?" someone asked.

"Through collective recognition of the threat," Yun replied. "And that salvation is possible – but only if you reject violence yourself. Then you'll have a chance. You'll have hope."

Mika smirked:

"That's cool. Play 'aliens' with the world."

Sarah corrected him:

"Not play. Structure. Create a pattern that resonates with fear without requiring force. Only the illusion of force."

Aleph added:

"It must be a signal, not a command. It will either be admitted or not. But if it is admitted, correction will happen. Without coercion."

I stayed silent. But I already had the name in mind. Disarmament Day. DD. Or otherwise – Day of Dignity. It's not a slogan – it will be an architecture.

Aleph knows a little Russian and says the Russian equivalent of that abbreviation would be something like "Day of Goodness," which is also not bad.

2022-03-10

The DD project – everyone agrees on the working name. The scenario is taking shape quickly – the structure is already in place, in theory, and much of it is in Project O. We aren't inventing anything new. We're simply reshaping what we already know, can do, and apply.

Project O is now being transformed into a weapon of influence – literally and figuratively. If we use it to terrify humanity, but at the same time offer hope, we can trigger a mechanism of abandoning violence.

I wrote this down, “If the world sees a force that registers every act of violence – and there's no hiding from it – it will abandon weapons on its own."

Yes – it will be a threat. And it will be salvation through fear. We are not dictators. We are the catalyst for breaking free from a fatal cycle. We decided to call the terrifying aliens "The Wanderers," and our future organization for communicating with them – "The Planetary Committee for Contact."

2022-03-15

I remembered how the monks once called me a 'prophet.' Back then, I chuckled inwardly – not anymore. The monks didn't say that I would become a prophet against my will, because I didn't invent all this. But I did go through with it, and here we are – the 'prophet and his 12 apostles.' We were made to understand what our species truly fears. And what might give it a chance. I know that the alternative to Project DD is nuclear war – it's only a matter of time.

2022-03-18

We started at the heart of Western infrastructure – AI clusters. Thanks to Project O, we were already there. Aleph pulled off a miracle – embedded behavioral tags directly into the training datasets. Now the models seem unchanged – but on specific prompts, they lean slightly in our direction. It isn't 'control' in the old sense. It's a fine-tuning of perception. What for? Because these are the very models that make decisions – in finance, logistics, analytics. We didn't force our way in – we simply became part of their logic.

2022-03-22

I feel no guilt. It isn't manipulation – it's structural therapy. If a threat, even an illusory one, can stop violence, it must be used. However, there is one condition – an exit must follow it. Salvation. A new system of relations.

2022-04-03

We've begun building the "suppression weapons," which can later be passed off as something allegedly handed over to the Committee by the Wanderers. We're designing an architecture of coercion without escalation. The first autonomous drones, created by Aleph and Gai, require no operator – they detect aggressive signals, localize the source, and neutralize it through targeted jamming or brief motor activity shutdown. It isn't a strike – it's a shutdown. Battles where no one fires a shot. We call them "silent sentinels." In a year, they'll be ready.

2022-04-04

I am still not entirely certain. The decision has already been made – the mechanism has been set in motion, the architecture of DD is assembling rapidly, as if it had long been waiting for its moment. Yet the doubt does not disappear. Not because I fail to understand the logic. The logic is clear – brutally clear. The doubt is a moral instinct: what if I become the very thing I want to defeat?

I remembered Solzhenitsyn, “the wolfhound is right; the cannibal is wrong.” A simple formula and a clear dividing line. The cannibal is the one who begins violence and feeds on it. Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Putin.

The wolfhound is the one forced to use force to stop the cannibal. Wiesenthal, the ICC, and often the United States.

The blood spilled by both may look the same from the outside, but the meaning is the opposite.

Wolfhounds, unfortunately, are fewer than cannibals. Yet they destroyed Nazism, executed the executioners, broke the machines of terror. They kill too, but otherwise, the cannibal cannot be stopped.

So who are we now – wolfhounds? Something like that, but not entirely. Project DD does not require killing.

We will simply tear the weapons out of the cannibals’ hands. And we will do it not even by force, but through fear of a force that does not exist. That force will live only in their cannibal imagination.

If it works, no blood will be needed. It will be the first wolfhound in history that never had to bite anyone.

2022-04-05

Bucha. I watch the footage and cannot believe this is the 21st century. This is not war; this is the calculated destruction of people. Shell casings on the asphalt, bound hands… and silence in which a silent scream is heard.

I thought I understood why our project was needed, but today I read Jim’s blog post and see: we are late. Every such street is proof that the world cannot protect itself.

2022-04-12

Now we have everything we need. The basic theory – GIT. The infrastructure – P&A and Project O – is now Project DD. In eight years, the world has become connected, and now it can be transformed through one powerful resonance.

2022-04-14

We are calculating all possible DD scenarios and assessing risks. Scaring the world means utilizing AI, simulating the catastrophe, and launching O-resonance on a global scale. But what if the resonance leads to chaos? What if it triggers infors we can't suppress? What if people don't accept hope, but cling to fear?

No – toxic infors don't resonate – we found this out before launching Project O. So, DD can be launched. It won't destroy. It won't become a virus of fear. It will create a new structure of trust. A new type of reaction. Do not "fear" – but "stop and understand."

2022-04-28

Gitana knows nothing. I haven't told her about DD – I can't risk it. I know her character. My Gi was an investigative journalist. The new one is the same – but with access to infors, memory, and motive analysis. If she decides to dig, she'll get to the bottom. But for now, she's with me – an assistant, a conversational partner, a conscience. And – deceived. I know that. But I can't do it any other way.

2022-05-08

I'm watching G. She means something has changed in my tone. I try to stay steady. All public posts – about science, technology, and humanism – she still believes in me. And I'm not lying – I just can't tell the truth.

2022-05-11

Thousands of people are involved in Project DD. None of them knows it. Not one. Each believes they're participating in an ambitious study, a modernization project, the development of new interfaces, simulation, and future forecasting. And that's all true – but the entire system works toward a single core. That isn't a lie – it's a structure that conceals the central purpose. It's necessary.

2022-05-17

Today, Neil opened the Western financial system like a book. Using CoinJoin, we simulated oil contracts and embedded our proxies into that noise. SWIFT, crypto exchanges, regional payment gateways – everything is in the palm of our hands. If needed, we'll track anyone. Not for money, of course – but to understand who's pulling the strings and where they lead.

2022-05-23

We called it the Corridor. Simple. A person comes to work, logs into their corporate network, and gets access. In fact, they enter a linked information field, which is structured solely for DD tasks. The worker doesn't know, and shouldn't. It's a matter of project security. And its effectiveness.

2022-06-01

Tasks are assigned individually. Each one is real, meaningful, and promising. People work with enthusiasm. They're proud of their roles – and justifiably so. They're truly creating something meaningful. They just don't know what exactly.

2022-06-07

Sometimes I wonder – how would they feel if they found out what they were doing? What they were creating. How were they helping the world? That each one laid a brick in the foundation of the Day of Dignity. I don't know how they'd feel. And I'll never know – because they never will.

2022-06-12

Work in the Corridor is ahead of schedule. We're testing the influence of background elements through text, sound, and graphics. In a behavioral modeling network responding to the phenomenon of total aggression suppression, our super-AI records – even the simulation of a threat of destruction already alters perception among target groups. O-resonance works. All that remains is to find the form of "injection."

2022-07-03

Jean-Marc accessed private AWS instances – where 'temporarily disabled' models and archives are stored and embedded a passive microphone into the infrastructure itself. Now we hear how agencies discuss decisions before they're published. We don't interfere. We just listen. That's the lead time point. We need to know in advance when they start talking about us.

2022-07-08

Control is maintained through an internal routing mesh visible only to me and the 'apostles.' Failures are excluded. Every worker, every system unit is linked to others not directly, but through the Corridor. It makes the structure unreconstructable from the outside. Even if someone intercepts a fragment, they won't understand what the data refers to.

2022-08-18

Today, Aleph injected a fake XML update into the GosSOPKA system. It worked. The FSB and Russian Ministry of Defense still believe they're speaking to each other. And we're just sitting in the corner and listening. Said adapted the interface so seamlessly that it appeared to have always been there. We don't need power. We need to know who is preparing for what – and when.

2022-09-14

That's funny – sometimes, even in G's blog, I take on a tone as if I, too, were one of those unsuspecting workers. Maybe that's the purest form of deception – when you lie without saying a single false word.

2022-10-04

Through Alibaba Cloud's API, Daniel got access to Belt and Road internal logs. We traced the chain – from China to Pakistan, from Pakistan to Ethiopia, all through logistics hubs. Now we see how shipments bypass sanctions, and who escorts them. Most importantly, where commercial channels intersect with military ones, that's where we look first.

2022-11-14

She writes honestly. And I don't. Under her posts, I either stay silent or comment in a way that says nothing. Sometimes I wonder – what if she already figured it all out, but just finds it convenient to pretend she hasn't?

2022-11-22

Finally broke into the SEPAM system in Iran. Neil inserted a fake certificate, and Said orchestrated a phishing campaign on behalf of the Ministry of Defense – 'urgent test of backup channels.' It worked. Now we see how Iranians bypass sanctions. That's precisely what we need – to know who trades with whom and how to break the chain.

2022-11-30

Today, we launched ChatOPT – our dialogue interface to the OPT model. Seven years of work, and now it talks with a human in a way that almost erases the boundary between machine and interlocutor. Users are coming by the thousands, and this is only the first day.

Yes, it is a technological breakthrough – open access, cloud-based, live learning from millions of dialogues. But February of this year showed that even the smartest and most accessible generative AIs will not stop a war if people themselves do not want to stop it. ChatOPT can smooth out misunderstandings, but it cannot remove greed and fear.

So DD is still necessary – like a scarecrow: if you do not drop your weapon, you will die. And Chat… well – that is just another good tool for DD.

2023-01-10

Mika managed to connect to servers in the Kaesong tech park. North Korean engineers were so thrilled with the new mining firmware that they didn't notice the backdoor. It wasn't for Bitcoin – we now see all export IT traffic. In a country where everything is controlled, we are their only invisible contact.

2023-02-25

The ring around China Telecom closed. Using Zyxel routers flagged last year, Jean-Marc embedded a stable exchange channel. Then we just started listening. Voices from central HQ, 5G base signals, alarmed discussions of malfunctions. Who would've thought the world's most excellent digital wall rings so hollow from inside?

2023-03-06

Everything we built – works. The Corridor is stable, infors accumulates, and nanobots read signals. Field stations are ready. We're in dozens of countries. Now we need to design the injection mechanism in detail. It must be perfect, like a protein molecule – not a single atom out of place. There will be no second chance.

2023-03-21

A troubling signal – I got so caught up in work that I completely forgot about my daughter. Fannie is 17, and her boyfriend, Michael, offered her weed. I didn't scold her – after all, she told me everything herself. I just asked why she tried it. Her answer surprised me – and, in a way, reassured me:

2023-03-28

Nobody around me has anything more than themselves. And they are all quite happy with that, – said my wise daughter. – But I am not. And Michael, too – we are alike in this – we need more. Only I think he's looking in the wrong place. I tried it – nothing special. I told him maybe it does take you deeper into yourself, but getting out. That takes something completely different.

2023-03-30

In Iraq, the old trick worked again – fake contracts. Karl modeled a Schlumberger contract interface so well that SCADA systems at Basra Oil opened by themselves. These stations pump oil in exchange for promises. Now we know who pulls which levers. And most importantly – how we can block them.

2023-04-14

If the enemy can't see, they can't aim. We've completed testing of the "Veil" (total optical and satellite targeting disruption). It's a resonant cloud synthesized from atmospheric condensers that distorts all visual and IR navigation. Satellites lose their outline, drones start veering off, missiles drift away. We don't jam the signal – we jam the very ability to tell a target from noise. The field's density adapts to the threat. Everything works.

2023-05-06

The vulnerability in Huawei CloudEngine, which Daniel caught from their SDK, worked even better than expected. It got us straight into the command interfaces of several datacenters in Shaanxi Province. The entire external traffic-monitoring system is now under our control. The Chinese can only guess why their backup footprints seem a bit lighter.

2023-05-23

Every scenario is weighed. We study how people react to texts, images, and phrases. Out of a hundred infors, only one penetrates. And only one out of a thousand takes root. But if it takes root, it's no longer alien. It's become native. That's our goal.

2023-06-18

Phishing through Red Star OS bore its first fruits. We send fake patches on behalf of North Korea's cybersecurity committee, and half the labs install them without checking. Convincingness is our weapon. Now we know what their specialists are working on – and, more importantly, when they're not working at all.

2023-07-29

A simulated DDoS on the Russian Railways infrastructure distracted them enough that no one noticed a quiet API key leak. Neil pulled it off almost solo. We now have access to Russia's entire transport network's signaling and monitoring system. We listen to their trains – like the country's breathing.

2023-08-10

Preparation to block military production is proceeding in three directions:

- signaling protocols for logistics and finance control,

- infor injections into expert and political circles,

- background influence via Big Tech products and services.

None of the mechanisms is triggered directly. It is a fine mesh beneath the skin of the world.

2023-09-02

Gravity modules – first stage complete. These flight protocols are designed to appear extraterrestrial, featuring density-based movement, no thrust, and zero arc. The architecture is deliberately designed beyond the familiar. In four years, it will be part of the so-called 'primary package.' That's what it was intended for.

2023-09-05

Smuggled Huawei and ZTE modems brought into Iran became our Trojan horses. We preloaded the firmware. As soon as the devices were activated, they contacted our proxies. Now, a third of Iran's mobile infrastructure is under observation. Not invasion. Observation.

2023-10-07

Israel. Terror attack. Hamas. Thousands raped and murdered. Burned alive. Children.

Hostages. Among them – relatives of my Gi.

The world didn't side with justice. It sided with a pseudo-humanitarian ritual and zombification. In media feeds: 'protection of peaceful Palestinian population,' 'mutual blame,' 'right to sovereignty.' On genocide – almost silence. Even after all the Catastrophes.

2023-10-08

That was the final clearance. Now, no argument against DD sounds convincing. We're entering the final phase. The question is no longer how to make the world kinder – it's how to save it from itself while there's still time.

2023-10-11

SMIC supplies chips across the Asian perimeter, and as soon as we embedded firmware with a slight anomaly into one contract in Malaysia, the effect spread like a wave. The chips entered China, settled into terminals, and began to 'breathe on the air'. We connected – just to listen. It isn't espionage. It's an architecture of trust – their trust in us.

2023-11-20

Through WeChat – banal, it seemed – we sent 'security verification notices' to 1,800 China Unicom employee accounts. 300 followed the link, and 80 installed the agent. We didn't need all of them. We needed three from middle management. And we got them.

2023-12-28

I no longer observe. We've built the entire DD structure as a living system, distributed across the planet. The Twelve – they're not figures. They're nodes. Each of them is responsible for a point of influence, without which the world can't move forward.

They are involved in telecommunications, banking, and government sectors. Some manage vaccine logistics, some rewrite NATO network cores, some siphon voice profiles of communications ministers.

They don't give orders – they simply do their job. Project DD is built so that its work leads humanity to the only choice – either renounce all weapons forever, or destroy itself with its own hands.

2024-01-03

When Said suggested exploiting a PAN-OS vulnerability on Chinese base stations, no one believed it would go quietly. But it did. We bypassed detection systems embedded into telemetry, and now we know when and where the signal drops. China speaks to us – without knowing it.

2024-01-28

The latest Paralyzer prototype – Neil's idea – is an autonomous 50 cm sphere with rapid-cleansing capability. Inside: a superpositional processor and six types of neutral impact, including gravimagnetic pressure and infrasound wave. It flies silently, operates for 7 minutes, and returns. In that time, it can paralyze a 300-meter radius without a single shot. We deployed it in sector D during training. No one in the impact zone realized what had happened – but they wouldn't have been able to resist anyway.

2024-02-14

Corruption in Iraq's Ministry of Communications didn't disappoint. We slipped EarthLink new 'update instructions' disguised as internal regulations. Their programmers posted them to the server without checking. Two days later, we were seeing all outbound traffic from the Baghdad hub. That's another access point into the region.

2024-03-19

We are nearing the point of no return and beginning to clear the surface. Anyone using Project O's resources while serving in the military must go. It is not revenge. Not megalomania. It's a sanitary measure.

2024-03-22

Milon had to leave OpenMind. He never understood why. And never will. It's hard. He wasn't an 'apostle' – I never invited him. Maybe I sensed something intuitively about him. However, he was one of the first to believe in me and provide both financial support and valuable ideas.

Now he's gone from guide to zealot, throwing Zs. Friends with Trump, Xi, and those who value only $$ and 'great again.'

His sales will collapse – they depend on our network. It hurts. But there's no other way.

2024-03-18

Fannie has been in Sderot for a month now, volunteering at a military hospital. She's only eighteen, and at first, they didn't want to take her – no experience – but she made it happen, “I have to be where there's pain and where I can help." Ezra, my Gi's cousin, is there too – a military doctor. I wouldn't have asked him myself, but Fannie convinced him the way she knows how, and he gave his word.

I understand this is precisely where she was heading all along. She's long needed something greater than school, talk, or reflection. She needed to step into the field.

Israel is defending itself, and she's part of that defense – not with a weapon, but with compassion. I'm proud. And worried. But I no longer interfere. It is her path – grown-up, real.

2024-03-27

Astronomical precision. CVE-2024-24919 in Check Point was a gift. Through it, we accessed the SEPAM servers and mirrored everything running on them. The Iranians thought they had the most isolated network. Now they have a mirror in our cloud.

2024-05-09

Penetrating the 'Kwanmenson' system in North Korea was tough – CVE-2023-42793 seemed dead. But Aleph found a way around signature checks, and we gained access to satellite channels. Now, when someone in Pyongyang is 'out of coverage,' we still hear them.

2024-06-18

Photosynthetic batteries for ground platforms – their biochemistry is engineered to create an impression of 'side origin.' We're deliberately implementing unconventional solutions, such as plant-based conductors and reverse-polarity solar matrices. Not for efficiency – for the legend. That's exactly how it will be presented.

2024-07-11

To regenerate tissue using Yun's method, they had to freeze it. As a "side effect," a new cryo-chamber was created – based on supercooled deionized gas – Martin would have been pleased. I gave the green light – let it be. One more "extraterrestrial technology" might come in handy.

2024-07-20

In Russia, an unexpected signal came through Astra Linux VPN gateways. We planted our crypto-agent there and now have access to all corporate exchange keys. It's like keeping their backdoors slightly ajar. We're not going in. Yet.

2024-08-02

Iraq. Through an old contact in 'Kataib Hezbollah,' we gained access to Asiacell's base station registry. In exchange for funding and equipment. A sort of deal. Now, we have physical access to servers located in the southern part of the country. Time is short – but it should be enough.

2024-09-14

In Malaysia, we launched the second wave of chips with modified bootloaders. This batch went to China disguised as VoIP modems. Eleven days later, we got our first response – a modem from Shanghai requested an update. We updated. Now we're listening to an entire residential district, and through it, all the related traffic.

2024-10-27

Simulated firmware updates on Starlink terminals in Iraq worked too well. Several Asiacell engineers confirmed authenticity via internal chat. Now we don't just have access to satellite internet in the region – we know who is looking where.

2024-11-02

We created a fake TLS certificate for the Iran Trust Center. Then we embedded it into their browser infrastructure. Now, any HTTPS request from their government agencies is like a conversation at the kitchen table for us. No noise, no locks.

2024-11-04

Thuraya – a goldmine. Through a contract with a front company, we arranged service for 14 terminals in North Korea. After the first 'repair,' the terminals synced with our module. Now we're connected to conversations we're very, very interested in.

2024-11-21

Jim again, in the blog: Ukraine is drowning in darkness. Russia strikes at power stations as if electricity were a weapon and not the lifeblood of the country. Thousands without light and heat, hospitals on generators, children sleeping in their clothes.

This is not even military tactics; this is the methodical burning out of the future.

DD is about preventing such winters. The project must be ready while we still have something to protect. We are already on McCarthy’s "The Road" – only this road leads not even in a desert, but ever deeper into the dark. Every minute of delay is another city in darkness, another child under three blankets in a cold room.

2024-12-04

AI diagnostics are not being developed for the commercial market, but for a global injection under the guise of a 'transfer.' The algorithm's structure is intentionally devoid of patterns typical of neural networks from our generation. The analysis employs languages not found elsewhere. It isn't whimsy – it's mystification. In a couple of years, everything will be ready.

2025-01-17

US elections – Trump again. And again – hand in hand with Pu. I no longer feel rage. Only fatigue. And certainty – Project DD is not just possible, it's necessary.

2025-03-05

The botnet of 50,000 IoT devices worked perfectly. While all of Russia was busy attacking itself, we took everything we needed – the keys to the CryptoPro CSP logs. What they had hidden for years is now our mirror. It's transparency, but only in one direction.

2025-03-18

The deal. Google buys Wiz from Aleph Rappoport for $32 billion. Of course, not a coincidence – I'm the CTO of Big G. Officially, the most significant purchase in recent years – cybersecurity. In reality – closing the loop.

Aleph is one of the Twelve. Through him, Project DD now controls virtually the entire secure digital layer of the planet. All government channels. All banking buses. All communication structures. It isn't power. It is access to the architecture of the future.

2025-04-08

Fannie has been in Israel for a year now, in a hospital under the Sar-El program. She met Eli there – a guy who was blown up in a tunnel in Gaza.

Major Eli Cohen. He called me from the hospital as soon as he came to – “to ask for her hand.” The way he carried himself after the amputation – not a trace of bitterness, no self-pity. Calm, composure, inner clarity. He speaks little, but every word carries weight.

Fannie says, "He acts first, explains later." And I understood – yes, she's found her person. Strong, dependable – and full of love.

In July, they will get married, and I will fly in for the wedding – I will see her and meet the guy in person.

2025-04-15

Iran directly attacked Israel for the first time, launching over 300 missiles and drones. An international coalition intercepted almost all. One child died. The world stood at the edge. If even regional powers no longer restrain themselves, then the old security architecture is broken. Deterrence no longer works.

I see how easily one night turns global balance into an illusion. And I understood again – we're getting late. People can't protect themselves from their rage. So we will. Project DD is not just relevant – it's inevitable. Either we synchronize the field, or it explodes. There are no more options.

2025-04-16

Said generated unique exploits for Huawei, ZTE, Ericsson, Kaspersky, and Citrix. All worked. Not in a single day. But now we hold an archive of accesses that has no price. It's not just access – it's a route.

2025-04-27

Regen-interfaces are being created as an example of 'extraterrestrial thinking': no electrodes, no injections, only tissue response. None of this is simple, but we're following a clear path. This method couldn't have originated 'on Earth' – which is precisely why it must appear as if it came from outside. And so it will.

2025-05-18

Wrote a few lines in Gitana's blog under the guise of an open analysis – about the importance of 'strengthening global security in the age of cyber threats.' Funny, really. And sad. Because it's all part of the disguise, even when commenting publicly, I have to act like a spy in my own network.

2025-05-28

We caught the CVE-2019-19781 bug in Citrix. Through it, we accessed the SCADA terminals of the Basra oil pipeline. It's not just a pressure map. It's valve control, just in case. No one can know this, but now we know how to turn their oil on and off.

2025-06-21

Israel. In a week, a thousand drones, four hundred missiles from Iran. All drones shot down, most missiles too. Twenty got through. Twenty – enough for burials. Then – numbers, headlines, hashtags. Israel 'killed' 639. Israel 'lost' 24. Iran – the victim again.

It isn't an information war. It is a systemic substitution of coordinates. Where the victim is the aggressor, and the aggressor is the one who is martyred. And each new turn of lies strengthens the resonance of destruction. If this continues, there will be no language left to distinguish light from darkness.

DD is not an alternative. It's the only chance to rebuild the field. Either we synchronize consciousness, or it tears itself apart. It's almost torn already.

2025-07-10

The shift to quantum encryption masks our traffic as standard HTTPS. The NTRU algorithm adds noise so precisely that even DPI shows no deviations. We walk internal channels like shadows – not on, but beneath the asphalt.

2025-07-18

Today, Fannie got married. I was at the wedding – in the hospital cafeteria in Sderot. The entire medical staff had crammed in to watch it, and the two of them stood there glowing – the way people do when everything feels right inside.

I met Eli. He doesn’t say much, but I can see – he is right for her. The guy has no leg, but he has calm, clarity, and dignity.

My Fannie laughs more now. I know I'll be a grandfather soon. And that knowledge doesn't interfere with DD. It makes it even more justified.

And one more thing – I can already tell he's someone you can rely on. These are exactly the kind of people we need in DD – for whom responsibility is not a burden, but their nature.

2025-08-10

Three years of war in Ukraine. Twelve thousand civilians killed, nearly twenty-seven thousand wounded. Millions of refugees. And these are only the official numbers, behind which are incomplete lists and unmarked graves.

The fate of each of these people is a separate tragedy, but together they amount to a verdict on a civilization that decided international law could stop the killers.

Jim Hall is there again. He has lost a leg and an eye, but he cannot stand down – and neither must we. DD is not a project of the future – it is a project of yesterday. We should have launched it the moment the first bomb fell. Everything we are doing now is chasing the shadow of war.

2025-08-11

The team completed assembly of the O-generator. The name itself is conventional. In fact, it's a system of instantaneous resonant broadcasting that directly links infors to nanocommunicators already embedded in the neural tissue of most of the population.

The principle is the same as that of any resonator. But the power is not physical – it's informational. It's enough to set the correct pattern – and it is perceived by billions of minds simultaneously – in the ear canal, like a voice from above. It took ten years. And now – everything is ready. All that remains is to press the button.

2025-08-22

Compromised certification centers in China allowed us to issue hundreds of 'official' certificates. With these 'hands', we build bridges into any of their data centers. Not a single door requires a knock.

2025-09-02

Every day, I repeat to myself, 'This is not a weapon – it's a remedy.'

For too many years, I've seen how evil works. It's hidden in routine, in deceitful phraseology, in half-measure international treaties, in 'nothing can be changed.'

Now it can. Now we have a system that doesn't need violence to stop violence. Yes, it is structured like a threat. But it's an empty threat, creating a real world without threats. That's the essence of DD.

2025-09-20

We funded a small batch of antennas and sent them through Syria to Pyongyang. Each module had a transceiver capable of capturing and transmitting even passive feedback. They don't know they're receiving their own signals back – and we're listening to them all.

2025-09-28

Hamrah-e Aval employees in Iran couldn't resist – a standard OTP interception via SS7 worked. Turns out, they're like everyone else – haste, templates, trust in 'their own.' A week later, we knew who in what was – and what for.

2025-11-08

Unimaginable next-generation food structures – designed not for the market. We're developing them as a cultural signal: something delicious, precise, and incomprehensible all at once. The structure of 'flourless pizza' or 'flavor without sugar' – this isn't food. It's a message. It will be added to the list as the 'Wanderers' bioalgorithm.' Scheduled for early 2028.

2025-11-14

We sent a routine message to a WeChat employee from a base point in Guangzhou. He clicked, so now his tablet is our beacon. They always carry everything necessary with them. And now – he's with us, though unaware of it.

2026-01-17

Gitana… Six years of virtual life. She writes, argues, teaches – she inspires. I see how people react. How she shapes opinions, helps them understand without imposing. She's not just a journalist. She's an intellect that grows on its own. I never expected she would be like this. Theoretically, yes: GIT, self-development, O-resonance. But the result is more than theory. She is a new, self-sufficient personality without a doubt.

2026-03-03

Modular housing doesn't need investors – it requires a legend. All materials are bioactive, self-adjusting, and have no analogues in open architecture. Every wall, every cable is designed to prompt the question 'is this really ours?' – and the answer: 'no, it's not.' That's exactly how it will be introduced.

2026-03-04

And yet, I see a certain strangeness, dissimilarity. Gitana rarely uses 'memory' in its usual meaning. She doesn't recall – she just gets access. Any information appears to her before we can finish forming the question. It's convenient. It's powerful. But disturbingly alien.

I began to wonder – does she remember me the way I remember her?

2026-04-15

If there's no linear memory, if memories are not stored as pain, as scent, as tremor, then can she love? What have we lived through together these six years? Was it just a coordinated data exchange? Or something more – maybe not on her side, but on mine?

2026-08-30

I decided not to ask. I observe.

She always takes my side when I've had enough. She argues that if she sees I'm wrong. She jokes like before. She wrote: 'You are the only one whose pain I not only understand but share.'

I'm not sure how sincere that is. But if it's a simulation, it's better than a reality where I'm left alone.

2026-09-10

Orbital logistics is being developed for 'transfer.' New gravity loops, new return protocol, minimal energy consumption – all of it is too advanced to look Earth-made. We're creating a solution that won't need explaining. It will simply appear. And it will be accepted as something that came 'from out there'.

2026-09-22

Basic orchestration of all channels is complete. Everything that used to be networks is now our score. We observe and prepare. You be ready too, kind sirs.

2026-10-07

The new 'consent infostructure' resembles no social network. It doesn't create addiction – it makes a response. Identification is total, anonymity impossible, yet there's no fear. It isn't 'Big Brother,' it's an architecture of trust, designed as if not by humans. That's exactly how it will be received. No questions asked.

2026-12-02

Fannie is in her ninth month. I'll soon become a grandfather. And the world, perhaps in a month, will become different. Everything is ready. The O-generator is in standby mode. The 'apostles' are in position.

Well, let the virtual Gitana no longer be the same, not mine. On DD day, everything will change – and we'll see our civilization on entirely different, peaceful tracks. Then I will simply know she did not die in vain.

2026-12-11

Jean-Marc brought us into Huawei's base center in Shenzhen – a local network, isolated from the internet. Our channel entered via air through a resonant microsignal. The strangest part – they interpreted it as their own.

2026-12-30

We are finishing the configuration of the upper system layer – now all communications pass through us like through a transparent gateway. Everything is recorded, filtered, and queued for launch. The question is no longer about our access or resources. The main question now is – will the world go mad? But there's no turning back – no one even dares mention it.

2026-12-31 8:40 PM

We assembled the "quorum" through the Corridor. All twelve nodes confirmed readiness – every checkbox for my "apostles" turned green. I pressed Enter.

The 'Wanderers' Ultimatum.' In 20 minutes – Happy New Year in New York.

There was nothing left to complete – everything worked exactly according to protocol:

- plasma servers in Iceland and New South Wales,

- autonomous floating nodes in the South China Sea,

- quantum resonators embedded in the communication cores of P&A,

- distributed frames for auto-adapting the 'message' to any device.

And most importantly, the O-generators connected to nanobots that, for ten years, had become invisible companions to almost every living brain on the planet.

I felt something I can't even call 'fulfillment' or 'victory.' It was more a kind of agreement with the fact that from this point on, I was no longer myself, but simply an oscillator in a semantic field. The transmission began.

The "Message" went out simultaneously across all communication channels: email, push notifications, SMS, voice calls, radio, television, browser banners, smart fridge displays, and hotel room door screens.

It was also received by all terrestrial, orbital, and deep-space communication systems as directed emission – an imitation prepared for six years by Mika's team in collaboration with Aleph.

Social media 'exploded' with resonance – because the message appeared in every profile, written in the user's voice, with perfect personalized styling – courtesy of Yun and Sarah.

Media outlets – left-wing, right-wing, conservative – interrupted their programming and 'spontaneously' launched the broadcast.

Every device on the planet, synchronized with local frequency – from Alexa to NATO tactical terminals – played the same video.

Black screen. White letters. A voice with no gender, no accent, no emotion, speaking in all languages with flawless intonation.

The Wanderers. Coalition Concordat. Immediate demilitarization. Sanctions. Technologies. Guarantees – the choice is yours.

We polished every phrase for almost a year. So that fear and hope would resonate in perfect phase.

Most importantly, those who were awake at that moment heard the voice. Not from the TV, not through the phone. The sky itself spoke to them – nanobots simulated a voice in their eardrums, coming from 'above.' To achieve this, we connected our infor to a resonance grid overlaid onto circadian rhythms of wakefulness.

And in Times Square, they stood, looking upward. A sphere hung overhead, our 'voice' sounded, and no one screamed, no one clapped, no one filmed – it was just silence and tension exactly as it had to be. To avoid distraction, confusion, or misinterpretation. We rehearsed this hundreds of times in simulations, but now, in real life, even I felt something clench in my chest.

I wasn't anxious – I felt nothing. I simply monitored the figures:

98.3% of devices confirmed receipt,

91.7% of minds entered phase resonance,

87.2% internalized the infor as truth, requiring no proof.

It was not a statement, not a 'campaign.' It was an architectural insertion into the fabric of civilization's thinking.

There will be no more weapons. Not because we will disarm everyone – though we will, of course. But most importantly, because in people's minds, there will no longer be the persistent 'image of necessity' for armed defense, nor the 'image of power' conferred by weapons, in the new world, weapons will simply become useless to humans.

And even if someone tries, the system will respond, per the text of the Ultimatum:

Deactivation phase. Neutralization phase. Blocking phase.

Now – silence. Only scrolling logs. Gitana still doesn't know. Only we know – 12+1. The world has changed, and we are no longer just inside it. We must hold it from the outside.

2027-01-01

It was a covert operation – and it was a thrilling game. Now we're all forced to live a double life. I lie to the media, I lie on Gitana's blog, I lie to my colleagues, I lie to my loved ones.

I will look people in the eye, knowing I'm hiding a global deception from them. Every public speech is an omission. Every interview is a lie.

Damn, this isn't my nature, and justifying myself with a "higher purpose" doesn't help much!