WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
The Sexes in Science and History / An inquiry into the dogma of woman's inferiority to man cover

The Sexes in Science and History / An inquiry into the dogma of woman's inferiority to man

Chapter 1: Transcriber’s Notes
Open in WeRead

About This Book

A sustained challenge to the dogma of female inferiority that applies evolutionary theory, comparative biology, and cross-cultural evidence to argue that the female organism often represents an advanced line of development. The work critiques scientific prejudices, surveys observed sexual dimorphism and purported male defects, and analyzes how social instincts and moral sensibilities evolved alongside sex differentiation. Drawing on ethnography and historical reconstruction, it traces prehistoric and early historic institutions, including gens, mother-right, marriage origins, and theories of wife capture, to show how male ascendancy emerged. The prose combines theoretical discussion with case studies to reassess assumptions about sex capacity and social consequences.

The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Sexes in Science and History

This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

Title: The Sexes in Science and History

Author: Eliza Burt Gamble

Release date: September 1, 2019 [eBook #60219]
Most recently updated: October 17, 2024

Language: English

Credits: Produced by MWS, Les Galloway and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive)

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE SEXES IN SCIENCE AND HISTORY ***

Transcriber’s Notes

Obvious typographical errors have been silently corrected. Variations in hyphenation and accents have been standardised but all other spelling and punctuation remains unchanged.

The precise location of footnote 256 is speculative since it is not indicated in the original.