WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
Throne-Makers cover

Throne-Makers

Chapter 2: PREFACE
Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

About This Book

A collection of concise essays profiles prominent political leaders and public figures, analyzing how individual temperament, strategy, and institutions combined to remake governments and national life. Each political study situates its subject within the social and constitutional conditions they confronted and traces tactics, administrative styles, and rhetorical impact. Complementary literary and artistic portraits condense available biographical and critical material on writers and painters, sketching intellectual views and creative methods. The volume emphasizes the interplay of personal agency and broader forces, offering compact character studies and contextual commentary rather than exhaustive narrative.

Since 1789 every European people has been busy making a throne, or seat of government and authority, from which its ruler might preside. These thrones have been of many patterns, to correspond to the diversity in tastes of races, parties, and times. Often, the business of destroying seems to have left no leisure for building. In England alone have men learned how to remodel a throne without disturbing its occupant; as we in America raise or move large houses without interrupting the daily life of the families who dwell in them.

To portray the personality of some of the conspicuous Throne-Makers of the century is the purpose of the following studies. I have wished to show just enough of the condition of the countries under review to enable the reader to understand what Bismarck, or Napoleon III, or Kossuth, or Garibaldi, achieved. I have been brief, and yet I trust that this method has afforded scope for exhibiting that influence of the individual on the multitude which—however our partial science may try to belittle it—was never more strikingly illustrated than by such careers as these in our own time.

The group of Portraits which follow require no special introduction. In the “Tintoret” and “Giordano Bruno” I have brought together as compactly as possible, for the convenience of English readers, what little is known about these two men. Berti’s work on Bruno, from which I have drawn largely, deserves a wider recognition than it has received outside of Italy; whoever reads it will regret that that eminent scholar was prevented from completing his volume on Bruno’s philosophy. The sketch of Bryant was written in 1894, that of Carlyle in 1895, on the occasion of their centenaries.

My thanks are due to the proprietors of The Atlantic Monthly, The Forum, and The American Review of Reviews for permission to reprint such of the following articles as originally appeared in those periodicals.

W. R. T.

8 Berkeley Street, Cambridge,

December 8, 1898.