“The description given by 'R' [a correspondent of the Intelligencer] of Washington's approach to the hall of Congress in Philadelphia, has freshly awakened my own reminiscences of the same scene. Its vivid truth can not be surpassed. I stood with him on that same stone platform, before the door of the hall, elevated by a few steps from the pavement, when the carriage of the president drew up. It was, as he describes it, white, or rather of a light cream-color, painted on the panels with beautiful groups, by Cipriani, representing the four seasons. The horses, according to my recollection, were white, in unison with the carriage, 'R.' says they were bays; perhaps he is more correct. As he alighted, and, ascending the steps, paused upon the platform, looking over his shoulder, in an attitude that would have furnished an admirable subject for the pencil, he was preceded by two gentlemen bearing long white wands, who kept back the eager crowd that pressed on every side to get a nearer view. At that moment I stood so near, that I might have touched his clothes; but I should as soon have thought of touching an electric battery. I was penetrated with a veneration amounting to the deepest awe. Nor was this the feeling of a schoolboy only; it pervaded, I believe, every human being that approached Washington; and I have been told that, even in his social and convivial hours, this feeling in those who were honored to share them never suffered intermission. I saw him a hundred times afterward, but never with any other than that same feeling. The Almighty, who raised up for our hour of need a man so peculiarly prepared for its whole dread responsibility, seems to have put an impress of sacredness upon his own instrument. The first sight of the man struck the heart with involuntary homage, and prepared everything around him to obey, When he 'addressed himself to speak,' there was an unconscious suspension of the breath, while every eye was raised in expectation.
“At the time I speak of, he stood in profound silence, and had that statue-like air which mental greatness alone can bestow. As he turned to enter the building, and was ascending the staircase leading to the Congressional hall, I glided along unperceived, almost tinder cover of the skirts of his dress, and entered instantly after him into the lobby of the house, which was of course in session to receive him. On either hand, from the entrance, stood a large cast-iron stove; and, resolved to secure the unhoped-for privilege I had so unexpectedly obtained, I clambered, boy-like, on this stove (fortunately then not much heated), and from that favorable elevation enjoyed, for the first time (what I have since so many thousands of times witnessed with comparative indifference), an uninterrupted view of the American Congress in full session, every member in his place. Shall I be pardoned for saying its aspect was very different from what we now witness? There was an air of decorum, of composure, of reflection, of gentlemanly and polished dignity, which has fled, or lingers only with here and there a 'relic of the olden time.'
“The house seemed then as composed as the senate now is when an impressive speech is in the act of delivery. On Washington's entrance, the most profound and death-like stillness prevailed. House, lobbies, gallery, all were wrapped in the deepest attention; and the souls of that entire assemblage seemed peering from their eyes on the noble figure which deliberately, and with an unaffected but surpassing majesty, advanced up the broad aisle of the hall between ranks of standing senators and members, and slowly ascended the steps leading to the speaker's chair. I well remember, standing at the head of the senate, the tall, square, somewhat gaunt form of Mr. Jefferson; conspicuous from his scarlet waistcoat, bright blue coat, with broad, bright buttons, as well as by his quick and penetrating air, and high-boned, Scottish cast of features. There, too, stood General Knox, then secretary of war, in all the sleek rotundity of his low stature, with a bold and florid face, open, firm, and manly, in its expression. But I recollect that my boyish eye was caught by the appearance of De Yrujo, the Spanish embassador. He stood in the rear of the chair, a little on one side, covered with a splendid diplomatic dress, decorated with orders, and carrying under his arm an immense chapeau-bras, edged with white ostrich-feathers. He was a man totally different in his air and manner from all around him, and the very antipode especially of the man on whom all eyes but his seemed fixed as by a spell. I saw many other very striking figures grouped about and behind the speaker's chair, but I did not know their names, and had no one to ask: besides, I dared not open my lips.
“The president, having seated himself, remained in silence, serenely contemplating the legislature before him, whose members now resumed their seats, waiting for the speech. No house of worship, in the most solemn pauses of devotion, was ever more profoundly still than that large and crowded chamber.
“Washington was dressed precisely as Stuart has painted him in Lord Lansdowne's full-length portrait—in a full suit of the richest black velvet, with diamond knee-buckles, and square silver buckles set upon shoes japanned with the most scrupulous neatness, black silk stockings, his shirt ruffled at the breast and wrists, a light dress-sword, his hair profusely powdered, fully dressed, so as to project at the sides, and gathered behind in a silk bag, ornamented with a large rose of black ribbon. He held his cocked hat, which had a large black cockade on one side of it, in his hand, as he advanced toward the chair, and, when seated, laid it on the table.
“At length, thrusting his hand within the side of his coat, he drew forth a roll of manuscript, which he opened, and rising, held it in his hand, while in a rich, deep, full, sonorous voice, he read his opening address to Congress. His enunciation was deliberate, justly emphasized, very distinct, and accompanied with an air of deep solemnity, as being the utterance of a mind profoundly impressed with the dignity of the act in which it was occupied, conscious of the whole responsibility of its position and action, but not oppressed by it. There was ever about the man something which impressed the observer with a conviction that he was exactly and fully equal to what he had to do. He was never hurried; never negligent; but seemed ever prepared for the occasion, be it what it might. If I could express his character in one word, it would be appropriateness. In his study, in his parlor, at a levee, before Congress, at the head of the army, he seemed ever to be just what the situation required him to be. He possessed, in a degree never equalled by any human being I ever saw, the strongest, most ever-present sense of propriety. It never forsook him, and deeply and involuntarily impressed itself upon every beholder. His address was of moderate length. The topics I have, of course, forgotten; indeed, I was not of an age to appreciate them: but the air, the manner, the tones, have never left my mental vision, and even now seem to vibrate on my ear.
“A scene like this, once beheld, though in earliest youth, is never to be forgotten. It must be now fifty years ago, but I could this moment sit down and sketch the chamber, the assembly, and the man.
“Having closed the reading, he laid down the scroll, and, after a brief pause, retired, as he had entered; when the manuscript was handed, for a second reading, to Mr. Beckley, then clerk of the house, whose gentlemanly manner, clear and silver voice, and sharp articulation, I shall ever associate with the scene. When shall we again behold such a Congress and such a president?”
To make the picture of the personal appearance of Washington more complete, the following, from Sullivan's Familiar Letters, is added:
“The following are recollections of Washington, derived from repeated opportunities of seeing him during the last three years of his public life. He was over six feet in stature; of strong, bony, muscular frame, without fullness of covering, well formed and straight. He was a man of most extraordinary physical strength. In his own house, his action was calm, deliberate, and dignified, without pretension to gracefulness or peculiar manner, but merely natural, and such as one would think it should be in such a man. His habitual motions had been formed before he took command of the American armies, in the wars of the interior, and in the surveying of wilderness lands, employments in which grace and elegance were not likely to be acquired. At the age of sixty-five, time had done nothing toward bending him out of his natural erectness. His deportment was invariably grave; it was sobriety that stopped short of sadness. His presence inspired a veneration and a feeling of awe rarely experienced in the presence of any man. His mode of speaking was slow and deliberate, not as though he was in search of fine words, but that he might utter those only adapted to his purpose. It was the usage of all persons in good society to attend Mrs. Washington's levee every Friday evening. He was always present. The young ladies used to throng around him, and engage him in conversation. There were some of the well-remembered belles of that day who imagined themselves to be favorites with him. As these were the only opportunities which they had of conversing with him, they were disposed to use them. One would think that a gentleman and a gallant soldier, if he could ever laugh or dress his countenance in smiles, would do so when surrounded by young and admiring beauties. But this was never so: the countenance of Washington never softened, nor changed its habitual gravity. One, who had lived always in his family, said that his manner in public life was always the same. Being asked whether Washington could laugh, this person said this was a rare occurrence, but one instance was remembered when he laughed most heartily at her narration of an incident in which she was a party concerned, and in which he applauded her agency. The late General Cobb, who was long a member of his family during the war, and who enjoyed a laugh as much as any man could, said that he never saw Washington laugh, excepting when Colonel Scammel (if this was the person) came to dine at headquarters. Scammel had a fund of ludicrous anecdotes, and a manner of telling them, which relaxed even the gravity of the commander-in-chief.
“General Cobb also said that the forms of proceeding at headquarters were exact and precise, orderly and punctual. At the appointed moment, Washington appeared at the breakfast-table. He expected to find all the members of his family (Cobb, Hamilton, Humphreys, were among them) awaiting him. He came dressed for the day, and brought with him the letters and despatches of the preceding day, and a short memoranda of the answers to be made; also the substance of orders to be issued. When breakfast was over, these papers were distributed among his aids, to be put into form. Soon afterward he mounted his horse to visit the troops, and expected to find on his return, before noon, all the papers prepared for his inspection and signature. There was no familiarity in his presence; it was all sobriety and business. His mode of life was abstemious and temperate. He had a decided preference for certain sorts of food, probably from early associations. Throughout the war, as it was understood in his military family, he gave a part of every day to private prayer and devotion.
“While he lived in Philadelphia, as president, he rose at four in the morning; and the general rule of his house was, that the fires should be covered and the lights extinguished at a certain hour: whether this was nine or ten is not recollected.
“In the early part of his administration, great complaints were made by the opposition of the aristocratic and royal demeanor of the president. Mr. Jefferson makes some commentaries on this subject, which do no credit to his heart or his head. These are too little to be transcribed from the works of this 'great and good man.' Doctor Stuart, of Virginia, wrote to him of the dissatisfaction which prevailed on this subject in Virginia. In the fifth volume of Marshall, page 164, will be found an extract of Washington's vindication of his conduct, and a most satisfactory one, which shows the proper character of Mr. Jefferson's 'Anas.' These complaints related, in particular, to the manner of receiving such visitors as came from respect or from curiosity, of which there were multitudes. The purpose of Washington was, that such visitors should accomplish their objects without a sacrifice of time, which he considered indispensable to the performance of his public duties.
“He devoted one hour every other Tuesday, from three to four, to these visits. He understood himself to be visited as the president of the United States, and not on his own account. He was then to be seen by anybody and everybody; but required that every one who came should be introduced by his secretary, or by some gentleman whom he knew himself. He lived on the south side of Chestnut street, just below Sixth. The place of reception was the dining-room in the rear, twenty-five or thirty feet in length, including the bow projecting into the garden. Mrs. Washington received visitors in the two rooms on the second floor, from front to rear.
“At three o'clock, or at any time within a quarter of an hour afterward, the visitor was conducted to this dining-room, from which all seats had been removed for the time. On entering, he saw the tall figure of Washington, clad in black velvet; his hair in full dress, powdered and gathered behind in a large silk bag; yellow gloves on his hands; holding a cocked hat, with a cockade in it, and the edges adorned with a black feather about an inch deep. He wore knee and shoe buckles; and a long sword, with a finely-wrought and polished steel hilt, which appeared at the left hip; the coat worn over the blade, and appearing from under the folds behind. The scabbard was white polished leather.
“He stood always in front of the fireplace, with his face toward the door of entrance. The visitor was conducted to him, and he required to have the name so distinctly pronounced, that he could hear it. He had the very uncommon faculty of associating a man's name and personal appearance so durably in his memory as to be able to call any one by name who made him a second visit. He received his visitor with a dignified bow, while his hands were so disposed as to indicate that the salutation was not to be accompanied with shaking hands. This ceremony never occurred in these visits, even with the most near friends, that no distinctions might be made.
“As visitors came in, they formed a circle around the room. At a quarter past three the door was closed, and the circle was formed for that day. He then began on the right, and spoke to each visitor, calling him by name, and exchanging a few words with him. When he had completed his circuit, he resumed his first position, and the visitors approached him in succession, bowed, and retired. By four o'clock this ceremony was over.
“On the evenings when Mrs. Washington received visitors, he did not consider himself as visited. He was then as a private gentleman, dressed usually in some colored coat (the only one recollected was brown, with bright buttons), and black on his lower limbs. He had then neither hat nor sword; he moved about among the company, conversing with one and another. He had, once a fortnight, an official dinner, and select companies on other days. He sat, it is said, at the side, in a central position; Mrs. Washington opposite; the two ends were occupied by members of his family, or by his personal friends.”
FOOTNOTES:
[152] Fraunces was a man of taste in his profession, and was fond of display, regardless of expense. On this account the president had frequent occasion to reprove him. He desired to live conformably to his high station, but he naturally abhorred waste and extravagance, and insisted that his household should be conducted with due regard to economy and usefulness. An illustrative anecdote is given. The first shad of the season was bought by Fraunces for the table of Washington, who was very fond of fish. It was served for breakfast in the best style, and set before the president, who asked the steward, “What kind of fish is this?”—"A fine shad,” replied Fraunces. “It is very early in the season for shad,” said the president; “how much did you pay for it?”—"Two dollars,” responded the steward. “Two dollars!” exclaimed the president. “I can never encourage this extravagance at my table; take it away—I will not touch it.” The shad was removed; and the steward, who felt no repugnance to the fish on account of its cost, made of it a hearty breakfast for himself.
WASHINGTON MEMORIALS.
In the Doric Hall of the Massachusetts State House, in Boston, near Chantrey's statue of Washington, may be seen two stones with inscriptions commemorative of the father and uncle of the two Washingtons who emigrated to America in 1657, as mentioned on page 20 of Volume I. The history of these stones is revealed in the following correspondence:
Boston, March 15, 1861.
To the Honorable House of Representatives:
I have the honor to present to the General Court, as a gift to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts from one of its citizens, certain memorials of great historic interest.
The home and resting-place of the ancestors of George Washington were until recently unvisited by and unknown to Americans. In the genealogical table appended to the “Life of Washington” by our distinguished fellow-citizen, Mr. Jared Sparks, it is stated that Lawrence Washington, the father of John Washington (who emigrated to Virginia in 1657), was buried at Brington; but though both Mr. Sparks and Washington Irving visited Sulgrave, an earlier home of the Washingtons, neither of these learned biographers appear by their works to have repaired to this quiet parish in Northamptonshire.
Our fellow-citizen, the Honorable Charles Sumner, on a recent visit to England, identified certain inscriptions in the parish church of Brington, near Althorp, as being those of the father and uncle of John Washington, the emigrant to Virginia, who was the great-grandfather of the Father of his Country.
Earl Spencer, the proprietor of Althorp, so honorably known as an early advocate of parliamentary reform, sought out the quarry from which, more than two centuries ago, these votive tablets were taken, and caused others to be made which are exact facsimiles of the originals. These he has presented to Mr. Sumner, who has expressed the desire that memorials so interesting to all Americans may be placed where they may be seen by the public, and has authorized me to offer them to the Commonwealth, if it be the pleasure of the Legislature to order them to be preserved in some public part of the State House.
I send with this a letter addressed to myself by the learned historian of Washington, bearing testimony to the great interest of these memorials, and expressing the desire that they may (Mr. Sumner assenting) be placed in the Capitol.
A letter from Mr. Sumner to Mr. Sparks also accompanies this Message, describing the church at Brington, and some of the associations which cluster around the resting-place of the ancestors of our Washington.
JOHN A. ANDREW.
Cambridge, February 22, 1861.
Dear Sir: I enclose a copy of a highly interesting letter from Mr. Charles Sumner, describing the church at Brington, near Althorp, in Northamptonshire. In this church were deposited the remains of Lawrence Washington, who was the father of John and Lawrence Washington, the emigrants to America, and who was therefore the last English ancestor of George Washington. A copy of the inscription on the stone which covers the grave of Lawrence Washington, and also of another inscription over the grave of his brother Robert Washington, who was buried in the same church, are given with exactness in Mr. Sumner's letter. As far as I am aware, these inscriptions are now for the first time made known in this country.
The Earl Spencer has sent to Mr. Sumner two stones, being from the same quarry, and having the same form and dimensions as the originals, and containing a facsimile of the inscriptions. It has been suggested that these stones ought to be placed in the State House, where they may be accessible to the public, and my opinion on the subject has been asked. As they are unquestionably genuine memorials of the Washington family, and possess on this account a singular historical interest, I cannot imagine that a more appropriate disposition of them could be made. I understand that Mr. Sumner would cheerfully assent to such an arrangement, and I cannot doubt that your Excellency will be well inclined to take such measures as may effectually aid in attaining so desirable an object.
JARED SPARKS.
His Excellency John A. Andrew,
Governor of Massachusetts.
Boston, November 22, 1860.
My Dear Sir: Since our last conversation, the Earl Spencer has kindly sent to me precise copies of the two “Memorial Stones" of the English family of George Washington, which I have already described to you as harmonizing exactly with the pedigree which has the sanction of your authority. These are of the same stone and of the same size with the originals, and have the original inscriptions—being in all respects facsimiles. They will, therefore, give you an exact idea of these most interesting memorials in the parish church of Brington, near Althorp, in Northamptonshire.
The largest is of Lawrence Washington, the father of John Washington, who emigrated to America. It is a slab of bluish-gray sandstone, and measures five feet and nine inches long, and two feet and seven inches broad. Here is the inscription:
WASHINGTON SONNE AND HEIRE OF
ROBERT WASHINGTON OF SOVLGRAVE
IN THE COUNTIE OF NORTHAMPTON
ESQUIER WHO MARRIED MARGARET
THE ELDEST DAUGHTER OF WILLIAM
BUTLER OF TEES IN THE COUNTIE
OF SUSSEXE ESQUIER, WHO HAD ISSU
BY HER 8 SONNS AND 9 DAUGHTERS
WHICH LAVRENCE DECESSED THE 13
OF DECEMBER A. DNI 1616.
THOU THAT BY CHANCE OR CHOYCE
OF THIS HAST SIGHT
KNOW LIFE TO DEATH RESIGNES
AS DAYE TO NIGHT;
BUT AS THE SUNNS RETORNE
REVIVES THE DAY
SO CHRIST SHALL US
THOUGH TURNDE TO DUST & CLAY.
Above the inscription, carved in the stone, are the arms of the Washingtons, with an additional quartering of another family.
The other is of Robert Washington, and of Elizabeth his wife. Robert was the uncle of the emigrant. This is a slab of the same sandstone, and measures three feet and five inches long, and two feet and six inches broad. The inscription is on a small brass plate set into the stone, and is as follows:
On a separate brass, beneath the inscription, are the arms of the Washingtons without any addition. These, as you are well aware, have the combination of stars and stripes, and are sometimes supposed to have suggested our national flag. In heraldic language, there are bars of gules and argent, with three mullets, or stars.
WASHINGTON·SONNE·&·HEIRE·OF
ROBERT·WASHINGTON·OF·SOVLGRAVE
IN·THE·COVNTIE·OF·NORTHAMPTON
ESQVIER·WHO·MARIED·MARGARET
THE·ELDEST·DAVGHTER·OF·WILLIAM
BVTLER·OF·TEES·IN·THE·COVNTIE
OF·SVSSEXE·ESQVIER·WHO·HAD·ISSV
BY·HER·8·SONNS·&·9·DAVGHTERS
WHICH·LAVRENCE·DECESSED·THE·13
OF·DECEMBER·A: DÑI:1616
THOV·THAT·BY·CHANCE·OR·CHOYCE
OF·THIS·HAST·SIGHT
KNOW·LIFE·TO·DEATH·RESIGNES
AS·DAYE·TO·NIGHT
BVT·AS·THE·SVNNS·RETORNE
REVIVES·THE·DAYE
SO·CHRIST·SHALL·VS
THOVGH·TVRNDE·TO·DVST·&·CLAY
In the interesting chapter on the “Origin and Genealogy of the Washington Family,” which you give in the Appendix to your “Life of Washington,” it appears that Lawrence, the father of the emigrant, died 13th December, and was buried at Brington, 15th December, 1616. But the genealogical tables, which you followed, gave no indication of the locality of this church. Had it appeared that it was the parish church of the Spencer family in Northamptonshire, the locality, which I believe has not been heretofore known in our country, would have been precisely fixed.
In point of fact, the slab which covers Lawrence Washington is in the chancel of the church, by the side of the monuments of the Spencer family. These are all in admirable preservation, with full-length effigies, busts, or other sculptural work, and exhibit an interesting and connected series of sepulchral memorials from the reign of Henry VIII. to the present time. Among them is a monument of the early English sculptor, Nicholas Stone; another from Nollekins from a design by Cipriani, and another by Flaxman, with exquisitely beautiful personifications of Faith and Charity. Beneath repose the successive representatives of this illustrious family, which has added to its aristocratic claims by services to the state, and also by the unique and world-famous library collected by one of its members. In this companionship will be found the last English ancestor of our Washington.
The other slab, covering Robert, the uncle of the emigrant, is in one of the aisles of the nave, where it is scraped by the feet of all who pass.
The parish of Brington is between seven and eight miles from the town of Northampton, not far from the centre of England. It is written in Domesday Book “Brinintone” and also “Brintone.” It contains about 2,210 acres, of which about 1,490 acres belong to Earl Spencer, about 326 acres to the rector in right of the church, and about 130 acres to other persons. The soil is in general a dark-colored loam, with a small trace of clay towards the north. Nearly four-fifths of the whole is pasture and feeding land.
In the village still stands the house said to have been occupied by the Washingtons when the emigrant brother left them. You will see a vignette of it on the title-page of the recent English work entitled “The Washingtons.” Over the door are carved the words, “The Lord giveth; the Lord taketh away. Blessed be the name of the Lord;” while the Parish Register gives a pathetic commentary by showing that, in the very year when this house was built, a child had been born and another had died in this family.
The church, originally dedicated to the Virgin, stands at the northeast angle of the village, and consists of an embattled tower with five bells, a nave, north and south aisles, a chancel, a chapel, and a modern porch; the tower is flanked by buttresses of two stages. The present fabric goes back in its origin to the beginning of the 14th century, nearly two hundred years before the discovery of America. The chancel and chapel, where repose the Spencers and Lawrence Washington, were rebuilt by Sir John Spencer, the purchaser of the estate, at the beginning of the 16th century. They afford one of the latest specimens of the Tudor style of architecture. The church is beautifully situated on the summit of the highest ground of Brington, and is surrounded by a stone wall flanked on the inside by trees. Dibdin says that a more complete picture of a country churchyard is rarely seen. A well-trimmed walk encircles the whole of the interior, while the fine Gothic windows at the end of the chancel fill the scene with picturesque beauty.
The Register of the Parish, which is still preserved, commences in 1560. From this it appears that Wm. Proctor was the rector from 1601 to 1627, covering the period of the last of the Washingtons there. The following further entries occur relating to this family:
1616. “Mr. Lawrence Washington was buried XVth day of December.”
1620. “Mr. Philip Curtis & Mis Amy Washington were married August 8.”
1622. “Mr. Robert Washington was buried March ye 11th.”
—— “Mrs. Elizabeth Washington, widow, was buried March ye 20th.”
Of one of the ministers in this church we have an interesting glimpse in Evelyn's “Memoirs” (vol. i. p. 612), where the following entry will be found, under date of July, 1688: “Dr. Jeffreys, the minister of Althorp, who was my lord's chaplain when Ambassador in France, preached the shortest discourse I ever heard; but what was defective in the amplitude of his sermon, he had supplied in the largeness and convenience of the parsonage-house.”
At a short distance—less than a mile—is Althorp, the seat of the Spencers, surrounded by a park of five hundred acres, of which one of the gates opens near the church. There are oak-trees bordering on the churchyard, which were growing at the time of the purchase of the estate in the reign of Henry VII. Evelyn was often here a delighted visitor. On one occasion he speaks of “the house or rather palace at Althorp” (vol. i. p. 612). In another place he describes it as “placed in a pretty open bottom, very finely watered, and flanked with stately woods and groves in a park” (vol. i. p. 451). Let me add that there is an engraving of Althorp at this time, by the younger Vosterman, a Dutch artist.
There is one feature of the park which excited the admiration of Evelyn, and at a later day of Mrs. Jameson, who gives to it some beautiful pages in her “Visits and Sketches at Home and Abroad.” It is the record of the time when different plantations of trees was begun. While recommending this practice in his “Sylva,” Evelyn remarks, “The only instance I know of the like in our country, is in the park at Althorp.” There are six of these commemorative stones. The first records a wood planted by Sir John Spencer, in 1567 and 1568; the second, a wood planted by Sir John Spencer, son of the former, in 1589; the third, a wood planted by Robert, Lord Spencer, in 1602 and 1603; the fourth, a wood planted by Sir William Spencer, Knight of the Bath, afterwards Lord Spencer, in 1624. The latter stone is ornamented with the arms of the Spencers, and on the back is inscribed, “Up and bee doing, and God will prosper.” It was in this scenery and amidst these associations that the Washingtons lived. When the emigrant left in 1657, these woods must have been well-grown. It was not long afterwards that they arrested the attention of Evelyn.
The Household Books at Althorp show that for many years the Washingtons were frequent guests there. The hospitality of this seat has been renowned. The Queen of James I. and the Prince Henry, on their way to London, in 1603, were welcomed there in an entertainment, memorable for a masque from the vigorous muse of Ben Jonson (Ben Jonson's Works, vol. vi. p. 475). Charles I. was at Althorp, in 1647, when he received the first intelligence of the approach of those pursuers from whom he never escaped until his life had been laid down upon the scaffold. In 1698, King William was there for a week, and, according to Evelyn, was “mightily entertained” (vol. ii. p. 50). At least one of the members of this family was famous for hospitality of a different character. Evelyn records that he used to dine with the Countess of Sunderland—the title then borne by the Spencers—”when she invited fire-eaters, stone-eaters, and opera-singers, after the fashion of the day” (vol. i. pp. 458, 483, 579).
The family was early and constantly associated with literature. Spencer, the poet, belonged to it, and to one of its members he has dedicated his “Tears of the Muses.” It was for Alice Spencer that Milton is said to have written his “Arcades,” and Sir John Harrington has celebrated her memory by an epigram. The Sacharissa of Waller was the Lady Dorothy Sidney, wife of the first Earl of Sunderland, the third Lord Spencer, who perished fighting for King Charles I. at Newbury. I do not dwell on the other associations of a later day, as my object is simply to allude to those which existed in the time of the Washingtons.
“The nobility of the Spencers has been illustrated and enriched by the trophies of Marlborough; but I exhort them to consider the 'Fairy Queen' as the most precious jewel of their coronet.” Thus wrote Gibbon in his memoirs, and all must feel the beauty of the passage. Perhaps it is not too much to say that this nobility may claim another illustration from its ties of friendship and neighborhood with the family of Washington. It cannot doubt that hereafter the parish church of Brington will be often visited by our countrymen, who will look with reverence upon a spot so closely associated with American history.
I trust that this little sketch, suggested by what I saw at Althorp, during a brief visit last autumn, will not seem irrelevant. Besides my own personal impressions, and the volumes quoted, I have relied upon Dibdin's “Ædes Althorpianæ,” so interesting to all bibliographical students, and especially upon Baker's “History of Northamptonshire”—one of those magnificent local works which illustrate English history—to which you refer in your Appendix, but which was not completed till some time after the “Life of Washington” appeared.
Of course, the Memorial Stones which I have received from Lord Spencer are of much historic value, and I think that I shall best carry out the generous idea of the giver by taking care that they are permanently placed where they can be seen by the public; perhaps at the State House, near Chantrey's beautiful statue of Washington—if this should be agreeable to the Commonwealth.
Pray pardon this long letter, and believe me, my dear Sir, with much regard,
CHARLES SUMNER.
Jared Sparks, Esq.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, by its Representatives, thanked Mr. Sumner, and directed the Memorial Stones to be placed where they now are.
ANALYTICAL INDEX.
For easy reading I have bolded the volume number.
A.
- Abercrombie, Major-General, letter of Dinwiddie to, recommending Washington for promotion into the royal army, i. 216;
- on unity in the colonies, i. 230;
- dilatory movements of—haughtiness of, toward the provincials, i. 231;
- Lord Loudoun superseded by, in 1758, i. 252;
- his expedition against Ticonderoga and Crown Point, i. 262;
- cowardice of, at Ticonderoga, i. 265;
- Fort George erected by, i. 266;
- the calumniator of Americans in England, i. 267.
- Academy, military, establishment of one urged on Congress by Washington, iii. 455;
- Washington's letter to Hamilton in relation to, iii. 549.
- Acadia, early history of, i. 178;
- removal of the population of, i. 179.
- Acadians, cruelties perpetrated by, on the English frontier settlers, i. 180.
- Accounts of Washington, i. 307, 318, iii. 34.
- Ackland, Lady, visit of, to the American camp at Bemis's heights, ii. 534;
- biographical notice of (note), ii. 535.
- Ackland, Major, wounded at Hubbardton, ii. 467;
- death of, at Saratoga (note), ii. 535.
- Adams, John, prediction of, in 1755, i. 70;
- extract from the Autobiography of (note), i, 432;
- his account of the choice, by Congress, of a commander-in-chief, i. 533;
- his admiration of Washington, i. 538;
- movements of Washington on the Schuylkill criticised by, ii. 516;
- treaty of peace signed by, in 1782, iii. 15;
- liberal commercial offer made by, to the British government, iii. 101;
- opinions of, on presidential etiquette, iii. 106;
- his “Discourses on Davila,” iii. 188;
- elected vice-president in 1792, iii. 222;
- a candidate for the presidency in 1796, iii. 451;
- letters of, to his wife, on learning his election to the presidency, iii. 468;
- inauguration of, iii. 472;
- jealous of the popularity of Washington, iii. 475;
- special session of Congress convened by, in 1798, iii. 494;
- letter of, to Washington, anticipating war with France, iii. 509.;
- advice of Washington to, respecting the choice of generals, iii. 511;
- Washington nominated by, as commander-in-chief, in 1798, iii. 512;
- inclination of, to reverse Washington's arrangement of the major-generals, iii. 522;
- anxiety of, to avert a war with France, iii. 528;
- feud between, and his cabinet, iii. 530;
- message of, to Congress, in relation to Mrs. Washington and funeral honors to her husband, iii. 565;
- Adams, John Quincy, appointed minister to the Hague in 1794, iii. 301.
- Adams, Mrs. John, lament of, for the death of Warren, i. 571;
- remarks of, on the personal appearance of Washington, i. 586;
- her description of the cannonade of Boston, ii. 63.
- Adams, Samuel, integrity of, i. 345;
- active in throwing the tea overboard in Boston harbor, i. 388;
- noble sentiments expressed by, i. 437;
- outlawed by a proclamation of General Gage, i. 552;
- not concerned in Conway's Cabal (note), ii. 589;
- part taken by, in celebrating the French victories in Holland, iii. 237.
- Addresses of the second continental Congress to the people of Great Britain and Ireland, i. 606, 610.
- Address, Washington's Farewell, iii. 427.
- Adet, M., colors of France presented to Washington by, iii. 385;
- reply of Washington to the speech of, iii. 386;
- attempts of, to influence the American people, iii. 451;
- extraordinary letter addressed by, to the Aurora and to the state department, iii. 452;
- pamphlet issued by, from the press of the Aurora, iii. 463.
- Agriculture, Congress urged by Washington to foster, iii. 455.
- Aix-la-Chapelle, boundaries in America left unsettled by the treaty of, i. 59;
- violation of the treaty of, by the French, i. 176.
- Albany, congress of delegates from the colonies assembled at, in 1754, i. 127.
- Alexandria, Washington stationed at, in 1754, i. 94;
- Washington introduced to the assembled governors at, in 1755, i. 145;
- bequest of Washington to the academy in, iii. 536;
- lots owned by Washington in, at the time of his death, iii. 543.
- Algiers, attention of Congress called by Washington to relations with—Colonel Humphreys appointed to treat with the dey of, iii. 293;
- payment of tribute to, advocated in Congress in 1794, iii. 294;
- treaty adjusted with, in 1795, iii. 379.
- Aliquippa, Queen, interview of Washington with, i. 91.
- Allen, Colonel Ethan, expedition of, against Ticonderoga, i. 524;
- disappointed in his desire to invade Canada, i. 531;
- retreat of, from St. John on the Sorel, i. 647;
- letter of, to the provincial congress of New York, urging the invasion of Canada, i. 650;
- an outlaw by act of the New York legislature—admitted to the floor of the provincial congress of New York, i. 653;
- letter of thanks from, to the provincial congress of New York, i. 654;
- letter of, to Governor Trumbull, in relation to the invasion of Canada—disappointment of, at his rejection by the Green Mountain Boys, i. 658;
- remark of Montgomery respecting, i. 659;
- body of Canadians raised by—unauthorized attempt upon Montreal made by, i. 672;
- defeated and made prisoner, i. 673;
- brutal treatment of, by Prescott. i. 674;
- his letter of remonstrance to Prescott, i. 675;
- subsequent history of (note), i. 675;
- Schuyler and Washington on the insubordination of, i. 675, 676;
- letter of Washington to Howe, in relation to the harsh treatment of—lenient treatment of, in England, ii. 28.
- "American Association,” articles of, i. 441;
- the signers of (note), i. 445;
- the Quakers adverse to, i. 457;
- measures for the enforcement of, adopted in all the colonies in 1775, i. 464;
- popularity of, in New York, i. 515.
- "American Continental Army" constituted, i. 531.
- Ames, Fisher, letter of, in relation to the Congressional debates on Jay's treaty, iii. 393;
- speech of, in the house of representatives, on the subject of Jay's treaty, iii. 405;
- extracts from the speech of, iii. 405-416;
- powerful impression produced by the speech of, iii 416.
- Amherst, Major-General Sir Jeffery, expedition of, against Louisburg, in 1758, i. 260;
- biographical notice of (note), i. 262;
- appointed to the chief command in America in 1759, i. 290;
- Ticonderoga taken possession of by, i. 292;
- fortifications built at Crown Point by, i. 292.
- Ancestry of Washington traceable for six hundred years, i. 18.
- Anderson, Captain Ephraim, fire-ships constructed by, ii. 236.
- Anderson, James, Washington's farm manager, letter of Washington to, iii. 548.
- André, Major John, among the prisoners taken at St. John on the Sorel, i. 680;
- correspondence of Mrs. Arnold with, ii. 689;
- sent by Sir Henry Clinton to confer with Arnold—arrest of, at Tarrytown, ii. 690;
- condemned to the death of a spy, ii. 693;
- execution of, ii. 694;
- names of the captors of, ii. 695.
- Annapolis, Irving's description of fashionable society in, before the Revolution, i. 307;
- first theatrical performance in America at, in 1752, i. 308;
- journey of Washington to, from New York, in 1783—ball given at, in honor of Washington, iii. 35;
- short stay of young Custis at the college at (note), iii. 533.
- Anthrax, malignant, Washington attacked by, in 1789, iii. 116;
- Appearance, personal, of Washington, i. 46, iii. 584, 590, 595, 597, 601.
- Arbuthnot, Admiral, arrival of, in New York, with troops, ii. 661;
- fleet of, damaged off Cape Hatteras, ii. 671;
- French blockaded by, in Newport, ii. 681.
- Armstrong, Colonel John, Kittanning destroyed by, in 1756, i. 226;
- medal presented to, i. 227.
- Armstrong, Major John, addresses to the continental army written by, in 1783, iii. 16, 18.
- Arnold, Benedict, expedition undertaken by, against Ticonderoga—disappointment of, at finding Allen in the field before him, i. 524;
- a volunteer in Allen's expedition, i. 525;
- protest sent by, to the provincial congress of Massachusetts, i. 526;
- St. John on the Sorel captured and afterward abandoned by, i. 646;
- experience of, at sea in early life, i. 647;
- proposition of, to the continental Congress, for the invasion of Canada, i. 648;
- dislike of, for Allen (notes), i. 648, 652;
- commission thrown up by, i. 649;
- friendly reception of, by Washington, i. 682;
- letter of General Gates to, at Watertown (note), i. 682;
- expedition against Quebec intrusted to, i. 683;
- instructions of Washington to, on his departure for Quebec, i. 683;
- address of, to the inhabitants of Canada (note), i. 684;
- private letter of Washington to, i. 687;
- departure of, from Newburyport, i. 688;
- army of, reduced by sickness and desertion, i. 689;
- treachery of Indian messengers of, i. 690;
- desertion of, by Colonel Enos, with his whole division—unparalleled hardships endured by the troops of, i. 692;
- encampment of, on the eastern shore of Lake Megantic, i. 693;
- destruction of vessels of, while descending the Chaudière—message of, to Montgomery, carried by young Aaron Burr, i. 694;
- joined at Sertignan by Norridgewock Indians, i. 695;
- friendly reception of, by the habitans of the valley of the Chaudière—approach of, known in Quebec through Indian treachery—fears excited in Quebec by the arrival of the troops of, at Point Levi, i. 696;
- names of men in the expedition of, afterward distinguished, i. 697;
- operations of, at Quebec, delayed by a snowstorm—Heights of Abraham scaled by, i. 701;
- reliance of, on the friendliness of the people of Quebec, i. 702;
- retirement of, from before Quebec—communication of, with Montgomery, i. 703;
- commendation of, by Washington for his conduct in the Quebec expedition, i. 713;
- wounded in the attempt to storm the fortifications of Quebec, i. 720;
- withdrawal of, to an entrenched camp—attempts of, to cut off supplies from the garrison of Quebec, i. 723;
- made brigadier-general. ii. 95;
- his urgent request of reinforcements from Wooster—letter of, to Congress, urging further efforts for the conquest of Canada, ii. 98;
- sorties from Quebec repelled by—compelled to resort to continental money for the purchase of supplies, ii. 99;
- ineffective fire opened by, upon Quebec—small-pox in the camp of—arrival of General Wooster at the camp of—departure of, for Montreal, ii. 100;
- letter of Schuyler to, expressing regret at the conduct of Wooster, ii. 101;
- efforts of, to obtain a surrender of prisoners, from Captain Forster, ii. 149;
- warning given to, at Montreal, of the approach of the British, ii. 164;
- goods of Montreal merchants seized by (note), ii. 165;
- retreat of, from Montreal, ii. 165;
- narrow escape of, from the British at Longueuil, ii. 166;
- the last man that left the shores of Canada, ii. 167;
- flotilla constructed by, at Ticonderoga—post taken by, with his flotilla, at Isle-aux-Têtes,ii. 255;
- great intrepidity displayed by, in a naval engagement on Lake Champlain, ii. 334;
- destruction of the vessels of—Crown Point abandoned by, ii. 336;
- complaints of, ii. 403;
- Washington's concern at the neglect of, by Congress, ii. 429;
- letter of, to Washington, in relation to his claims to promotion, ii. 480;
- wonderful escape of, while harassing Tryon's retreat from Danbury, ii. 436, 437;
- made major-general by Congress—appointed by Washington to the command at Peekskill, ii. 438;
- recommended by Washington to take the place of St. Clair, ii. 470;
- boldness and activity of, at Bemis's Heights, ii. 524;
- jealousy of General Gates excited against, ii. 526;
- deprived of his command by Gates, ii. 527;
- letters of, to Gates, urging him to attack Burgoyne, ii. 528, 529;
- activity of, at the second battle near Bemis's Heights, ii. 531;
- wounded at Bemis's Heights in the leg maimed at Quebec, ii. 533;
- Philadelphia taken possession of by, on the departure of Clinton, ii. 618;
- expensive habits of, in Philadelphia—marriage of, to Miss Shippen—charges preferred against, by the people of Philadelphia—sentenced by a court-martial to a reprimand, ii. 688;
- cautious advances made by, to Clinton, ii. 689;
- command at West Point solicited by, ii. 689;
- price of the treason of, ii. 690;
- letter of Jameson received by, while at breakfast—escape of, from West Point, ii. 692;
- attempt to abduct, made by Sergeant Champe, ii. 694;
- hated and despised by the British, ii. 695;
- persons suspected of complicity with, ii. 697;
- predatory excursion of, to Virginia—efforts of, to capture Governor Jefferson, ii. 711;
- ravaging expedition of, on the shores of Connecticut, ii. 727.
- Arnold, Mrs., early correspondence of, with Major André, ii. 689, 695;
- ordered by the executive council of Pennsylvania to leave the state, ii. 695.
- Articles of Confederation, adoption of, ii. 710;
- substance of (note), ii. 710;
- considered defective by Washington as a system of government—letter of Washington to James Warren, in relation to, iii. 54;
- letters of Washington and Jay in relation to a revision of, iii. 56;
- convention to amend, proposed by commissioners at Annapolis, iii. 59.
- Asgill, Captain, selected by lot for execution—sympathies of Washington excited for, iii. 14.
- Ashe, General, surprised by Prevost, at Brier creek, ii. 651.
- Asses, sent to Washington by the king of Spain and by Lafayette, iii. 51.
- Atlee, Colonel Samuel J., made prisoner at the battle of Long Island—biographical notice of (note), ii. 274.
- Aurora, abstract of Jay's treaty sent to the editor of, by Senator Mason, iii. 347;
- libel of Washington published in, iii. 369;
- confidential questions of Washington to his cabinet relating to the reception of Genet, published in, iii. 420;
- extraordinary letter of Adet addressed to, in 1796, iii. 452;
- malignant language of, in 1796, in relation to Washington—malignant letter of Paine to Washington issued from the press of, iii. 461;
- a pamphlet issued from the press of, by Adet, iii. 463;
- virulent attacks upon the character of Washington, published in, in 1797, iii. 477;
- public indignation excited against—editor of, severely beaten, iii. 478;
- American government criminated by, in defence of France, iii. 505.
- Awe, inspired by the presence of Washington, iii. 597, 598.