WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
Whose Body? A Lord Peter Wimsey Novel cover

Whose Body? A Lord Peter Wimsey Novel

Chapter 15: FOOTNOTES
Open in WeRead

About This Book

An urbane gentleman and his resourceful companion are drawn into a puzzling death after a resident discovers a naked corpse wearing only pince-nez in a suburban bathtub. The account traces the gentleman’s methodical inquiries across social and official circles, assembling physical clues, eccentric testimonies, and surprising documentary leads. Wry social observation and careful reasoning alternate as the investigation probes identity, motive, and concealment, and gradually reconstructs events that explain how the body came to be placed where it was found and what those circumstances reveal about the people involved.

FOOTNOTES

[A] This is the first Florence edition, 1481, by Niccolo di Lorenzo. Lord Peter’s collection of printed Dantes is worth inspection. It includes, besides the famous Aldine 8vo. of 1502, the Naples folio of 1477—“edizione rarissima,” according to Colomb. This copy has no history, and Mr. Parker’s private belief is that its present owner conveyed it away by stealth from somewhere or other. Lord Peter’s own account is that he “picked it up in a little place in the hills,” when making a walking-tour through Italy.

[B] Lord Peter’s wits were wool-gathering. The book is in the possession of Earl Spencer. The Brocklebury copy is incomplete, the last five signatures being altogether missing, but is unique in possessing the colophon.

[C] Apollonios Rhodios. Lorenzobodi Alopa. Firenze. 1496. (4to.) The excitement attendant on the solution of the Battersea Mystery did not prevent Lord Peter from securing this rare work before his departure for Corsica.

[D] Lord Peter was not without authority for his opinion: “With respect to the alleged motive, it is of great importance to see whether there was a motive for committing such a crime, or whether there was not, or whether there is an improbability of its having been committed so strong as not to be overpowered by positive evidence. But if there be any motive which can be assigned, I am bound to tell you that the inadequacy of that motive is of little importance. We know, from the experience of criminal courts, that atrocious crimes of this sort have been committed from very slight motives; not merely from malice and revenge, but to gain a small pecuniary advantage, and to drive off for a time pressing difficulties.”—L. C. J. Campbell, summing up in Reg. v. Palmer, Shorthand Report, p. 308 C. C. C., May, 1856, Sess. Pa. 5. (Italics mine. D. L. S.)