Wild Justice

A respected woman faculty member is accused of misconduct and brought before university authorities in a termination process that systematically undermines fair procedure. Institutional politics, manipulated evaluations, and decision-makers who act as accuser, prosecutor, and judge combine to marginalize her testimony and erect barriers to appeal. The narrative follows her struggle through hearings, faculty maneuvering, and bureaucratic and legal obstacles while exposing patterns of workplace sexism and administrative complacency. Interwoven commentary uses wit and indignation to critique how higher education can tolerate discriminatory practices, circumvent civil-rights protections, and preserve entrenched power structures.