WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
Wilde v Whistler / Being an Acrimonious Correspondence on Art Between Oscar Wilde and James A McNeill Whistler cover

Wilde v Whistler / Being an Acrimonious Correspondence on Art Between Oscar Wilde and James A McNeill Whistler

Chapter 7: IN THE MARKET PLACE
Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

About This Book

The pamphlet collects a sharp, public exchange of letters, essays, and newspaper pieces in which two prominent art figures trade praise, parody, and rebuke while arguing about the nature and purpose of art. Through polemical responses to lectures and reviews, they dispute whether beauty should be cultivated or shunned, whether painters alone may judge painting, and whether art must relate to social surroundings or stay autonomous. The pieces alternate wittily between satire and earnest aesthetic reflection, showcasing paradox, theatrical insult, and close readings of artistic practice, and offering an episodic portrait of late Victorian debates over criticism, taste, and the artist's role.

IN THE MARKET PLACE

Truth, Jan. 9, 1890.

SIR—I can hardly imagine that the public are in the very smallest degree interested in the shrill shrieks of “Plagiarism” that proceed from time to time out of the lips of silly vanity or incompetent mediocrity.

However, as Mr. James Whistler has had the impertinence to attack me with both venom and vulgarity in your columns, I hope you will allow me to state that the assertions contained in his letters are as deliberately untrue as they are deliberately offensive.

The definition of a disciple as one who has the courage of the opinions of his master is really too old even for Mr. Whistler to be allowed to claim it, and as for borrowing Mr. Whistler’s ideas about Art, the only thoroughly original ideas I have ever heard him express have had reference to his own superiority as a painter over painters greater than himself.

It is a trouble for any gentleman to have to notice the lucubrations of so ill-bred and ignorant a person as Mr. Whistler, but your publication of his insolent letter left me no option in the matter.

I remain, Sir, faithfully yours,

OSCAR WILDE.