WeRead Powered by ReaderPub
Wilde v Whistler / Being an Acrimonious Correspondence on Art Between Oscar Wilde and James A McNeill Whistler cover

Wilde v Whistler / Being an Acrimonious Correspondence on Art Between Oscar Wilde and James A McNeill Whistler

Chapter 8: PANIC
Open in WeRead

Explore more books like this:

About This Book

The pamphlet collects a sharp, public exchange of letters, essays, and newspaper pieces in which two prominent art figures trade praise, parody, and rebuke while arguing about the nature and purpose of art. Through polemical responses to lectures and reviews, they dispute whether beauty should be cultivated or shunned, whether painters alone may judge painting, and whether art must relate to social surroundings or stay autonomous. The pieces alternate wittily between satire and earnest aesthetic reflection, showcasing paradox, theatrical insult, and close readings of artistic practice, and offering an episodic portrait of late Victorian debates over criticism, taste, and the artist's role.

PANIC

Truth, Jan. 16, 1890.

O TRUTH!—Cowed and humiliated, I acknowledge that our Oscar is at last original. At bay, and sublime in his agony, he certainly has, for once, borrowed from no living author, and comes out in his own true colours—as his own “gentleman.”

How shall I stand against his just anger, and his damning allegations! for it must be clear to your readers, that, besides his clean polish, as prettily set forth in his epistle, I, alas! am but the “ill-bred and ignorant person,” whose “lucubrations” “it is a trouble” for him “to notice.”

Still will I, desperate as is my condition, point out that though “impertinent,” “venomous,” and “vulgar,” he claims me as his “master”—and, in the dock, bases his innocence upon such relation between us.

In all humility, therefore, I admit that the outcome of my “silly vanity and incompetent mediocrity,” must be the incarnation: “Oscar Wilde.”

J. A. McN. WHISTLER.