* These are the real types of the Christian Trinity.
"It is thus that God, after having been, First, The visible and various
action of the meteors and the elements;
"Secondly, The combined powers of the stars, considered in their relations
to terrestrial beings;
Thirdly, These terrestrial beings themselves, by confounding the symbols
with their archetypes;
Fourthly, The double power of nature in its two principal operations of
producing and destroying;
"Fifthly, The animated world, with distinction of agent and patient, of
effect and cause;
"Sixthly, The solar principle, or the element of fire considered as the
only mover;
"Has thus become, finally, in the last resort, a chimerical and abstract
being, a scholastic subtilty, of substance without form, a body without a
figure, a very delirium of the mind, beyond the power of reason to
comprehend. But vainly does it seek in this last transformation to elude
the senses; the seal of its origin is imprinted upon it too deep to be
effaced; and its attributes, all borrowed from the physical attributes of
the universe, such as immensity, eternity, indivisibility,
incomprehensibility; or on the moral affections of man, such as goodness,
justice, majesty; its names* even, all derived from the physical beings
which were its types, and especially from the sun, from the planets, and
from the world, constantly bring to mind, in spite of its corrupters,
indelible marks of its real nature.
* In our last analysis we found all the names of the Deity
to be derived from some material object in which it was
supposed to reside. We have given a considerable number of
instances; let us add one more relative to our word God.
This is known to be the Deus of the Latins, and the Theos of
the Greeks. Now by the confession of Plato (in Cratylo), of
Macrobius (Saturn, lib. 1, c. 24,) and of Plutarch (Isis and
Osiris) its root is thein, which signifies to wander, like
planein, that is to say, it is synonymous with planets;
because, add our authors, both the ancient Greeks and
Barbarians particularly worshipped the planets. I know that
such enquiries into etymologies have been much decried: but
if, as is the case, words are the representative signs of
ideas, the genealogy of the one becomes that of the other,
and a good etymological dictionary would be the most perfect
history of the human understanding. It would only be
necessary in this enquiry to observe certain precautions,
which have hitherto been neglected, and particularly to make
an exact comparison of the value of the letters of the
different alphabets. But, to continue our subject, we shall
add, that in the Phoenician language, the word thah (with
ain) signifies also to wander, and appears to be the
derivation of thein. If we suppose Deus to be derived from
the Greek Zeus, a proper name of You-piter, having zaw, I
live, for its root, its sense will be precisely that of you,
and will mean soul of the world, igneous principle. (See
note p. 143). Div-us, which only signifies Genius, God of
the second order, appears to me to come from the oriental
word div substituted for dib, wolf and chacal, one of the
emblems of the sun. At Thebes, says Macrobius, the sun was
painted under the form of a wolf or chacal, for there are no
wolves in Egypt. The reason of this emblem, doubtless, is
that the chacal, like the cock announces by its cries the
sun's rising; and this reason is confirmed by the analogy of
the words lykos, wolf, and lyke, light of the morning,
whence comes lux.
Dius, which is to be understood also of the sun, must be
derived from dih, a hawk. "The Egyptians," says Porphyry
(Euseb. Proecep. Evang. p. 92,) "represent the sun under the
emblem of a hawk, because this bird soars to the highest
regions of air where light abounds." And in reality we
continually see at Cairo large flights of these birds,
hovering in the air, from whence they descend not but to
stun us with their shrieks, which are like the monosyllable
dih: and here, as in the preceding example, we find an
analogy between the word dies, day, light, and dius, god,
sun.
"Such is the chain of ideas which the human mind had already run through
at an epoch previous to the records of history; and since their continuity
proves that they were the produce of the same series of studies and
labors, we have every reason to place their origin in Egypt, the cradle of
their first elements. This progress there may have been rapid; because the
physical priests had no other food, in the retirement of the temples, but
the enigma of the universe, always present to their minds; and because in
the political districts into which that country was for a long time
divided, every state had its college of priests, who, being by turns
auxiliaries or rivals, hastened by their disputes the progress of science
and discovery.*
* One of the proofs that all these systems were invented in
Egypt, is that this is the only country where we see a
complete body of doctrine formed from the remotest
antiquity.
Clemens Alexandrinus has transmitted to us (Stromat. lib.
6,) a curious detail of the forty-two volumes which were
borne in the procession of Isis. "The priest," says he, "or
chanter, carries one of the symbolic instruments of music,
and two of the books of Mercury; one containing hymns of the
gods, the other the list of kings. Next to him the
horoscope (the regulator of time,) carries a palm and a
dial, symbols of astrology; he must know by heart the four
books of Mercury which treat of astrology: the first on the
order of the planets, the second on the risings of the sun
and moon, and the two last on the rising and aspect of the
stars. Then comes the sacred author, with feathers on his
head (like Kneph) and a book in his hand, together with ink,
and a reed to write with, (as is still the practice among
the Arabs). He must be versed in hieroglyphics, must
understand the description of the universe, the course of
the sun, moon, stars, and planets, be acquainted with the
division of Egypt into thirty-six nomes, with the course of
the Nile, with instruments, measures, sacred ornaments, and
sacred places. Next comes the stole bearer, who carries the
cubit of justice, or measure of the Nile, and a cup for the
libations; he bears also in the procession ten volumes on
the subject of sacrifices, hymns, prayers, offerings,
ceremonies, festivals. Lastly arrives the prophet, bearing
in his bosom a pitcher, so as to be exposed to view; he is
followed by persons carrying bread (as at the marriage of
Cana.) This prophet, as president of the mysteries, learns
ten other sacred volumes, which treat of the laws, the gods,
and the discipline of the priests. Now there are in all
forty-two volumes, thirty-six of which are studied and got
by heart by these personages, and the remaining six are set
apart to be consulted by the pastophores; they treat of
medicine, the construction of the human body (anatomy),
diseases, remedies, instruments, etc., etc."
We leave the reader to deduce all the consequences of an
Encyclopedia. It is ascribed to Mercury; but Jamblicus
tells us that each book, composed by priests, was dedicated
to that god, who, on account of his title of genius or decan
opening the zodiac, presided over every enterprise. He is
the Janus of the Romans, and the Guianesa of the Indians,
and it is remarkable that Yanus and Guianes are homonymous.
In short it appears that these books are the source of all
that has been transmitted to us by the Greeks and Latins in
every science, even in alchymy, necromancy, etc. What is
most to be regretted in their loss is that part which
related to the principles of medicine and diet, in which the
Egyptians appear to have made a considerable progress, and
to have delivered many useful observations.
"There happened early on the borders of the Nile, what has since been
repeated in every country; as soon as a new system was formed its novelty
excited quarrels and schisms; then, gaining credit by persecution itself,
sometimes it effaced antecedent ideas, sometimes it modified and
incorporated them; then, by the intervention of political revolutions, the
aggregation of states and the mixture of nations confused all opinions;
and the filiation of ideas being lost, theology fell into a chaos, and
became a mere logogriph of old traditions no longer understood. Religion,
having strayed from its object was now nothing more than a political
engine to conduct the credulous vulgar; and it was used for this purpose,
sometimes by men credulous themselves and dupes of their own visions, and
sometimes by bold and energetic spirits in pursuit of great objects of
ambition.
IX. Religion of Moses, or Worship of the Soul of the World (You-piter).
"Such was the legislator of the Hebrews; who, wishing to separate his
nation from all others, and to form a distinct and solitary empire,
conceived the design of establishing its basis on religious prejudices,
and of raising around it a sacred rampart of opinions and of rites. But in
vain did he prescribe the worship of the symbols which prevailed in lower
Egypt and in Phoenicia;* for his god was nevertheless an Egyptian god,
invented by those priests of whom Moses had been the disciple; and
Yahouh,** betrayed by its very name, essence (of beings), and by its
symbol, the burning bush, is only the soul of the world, the moving
principle which the Greeks soon after adopted under the same denomination
in their you-piter, regenerating being, and under that of Ei,
existence,*** which the Thebans consecrated by the name of Kneph, which
Sais worshipped under the emblem of Isis veiled, with this inscription: I
am al that has been, all that is, and all that is to come, and no mortal
has raised my veil; which Pythagoras honored under the name of Vesta, and
which the stoic philosophy defined precisely by calling it the principle
of fire. In vain did Moses wish to blot from his religion every thing
which had relation to the stars; many traits call them to mind in spite of
all he has done. The seven planetary luminaries of the great candlestick;
the twelve stones, or signs in the Urim of the high priests; the feast of
the two equinoxes, (entrances and gates of the two hemispheres); the
ceremony of the lamb, (the celestial ram then in his fifteenth degree);
lastly, the name even of Osiris preserved in his song,**** and the ark, or
coffer, an imitation of the tomb in which that God was laid, all remain as
so many witnesses of the filiation of his ideas, and of their extraction
from the common source.
* "At a certain period," says Plutarch (de Iside) "all the
Egyptians have their animal gods painted. The Thebans are
the only people who do not employ painters, because they
worship a god whose form comes not under the senses, and
cannot be represented." And this is the god whom Moses,
educated at Heliopolis, adopted; but the idea was not of his
invention.
** Such is the true pronunciation of the Jehovah of the
moderns, who violate, in this respect, every rule of
criticism; since it is evident that the ancients,
particularly the eastern Syrians and Phoenicians, were
acquainted neither with the J nor the P which are of Tartar
origin. The subsisting usage of the Arabs, which we have
re-established here, is confirmed by Diodorus, who calls the
god of Moses Iaw, (lib. 1), and Iaw and Yahouh are
manifestly the same word: the identity continues in that of
You-piter; but in order to render it more complete, we shall
demonstrate the signification to be the same.
In Hebrew, that is to say, in one of the dialects of the
common language of lower Asia, Yahouh is the participle of
the verb hih, to exist, to be, and signifies existing: in
other words, the principle of life, the mover or even motion
(the universal soul of beings). Now what is Jupiter? Let
us hear the Greeks and Latins explain their theology. "The
Egyptians," says Diodorus, after Manatho, priest of Memphis,
"in giving names to the five elements, called spirit, or
ether, You-piter, on account of the true meaning of that
word: for spirit is the source of life, author of the vital
principle in animals; and for this reason they considered
him as the father, the generator of beings." For the same
reason Homer says, father, and king of men and gods. (Diod.
lib. 1, sect 1).
"Theologians," says Macrobius, "consider You-piter as the
soul of the world." Hence the words of Virgil: " Muses let
us begin with You-piter; the world is full of You-piter."
(Somn. Scrip., ch. 17). And in the Saturnalia, he says,
"Jupiter is the sun himself." It was this also which made
Virgil say, "The spirit nourishes the life (of beings), and
the soul diffused through the vast members (of the
universe), agitates the whole mass, and forms but one
immense body."
"Ioupiter," says the ancient verses of the Orphic sect,
which originated in Egypt; verses collected by Onomacritus
in the days of Pisistratus, "Ioupiter, represented with the
thunder in his hand, is the beginning, origin, end, and
middle of all things: a single and universal power, he
governs every thing; heaven, earth, fire, water, the
elements, day, and night. These are what constitute his
immense body: his eyes are the sun and moon: he is space and
eternity: in fine," adds Porphyry. "Jupiter is the world,
the universe, that which constitutes the essence and life of
all beings. Now," continues the same author, "as
philosophers differed in opinion respecting the nature and
constituent parts of this god, and as they could invent no
figure that should represent all his attributes, they
painted him in the form of a man. He is in a sitting
posture, in allusion to his immutable essence; the upper
part of his body is uncovered, because it is in the upper
regions of the universe (the stars) that he most
conspicuously displays himself. He is covered from the
waist downwards, because respecting terrestrial things he is
more secret and concealed. He holds a scepter in his left
hand, because on the left side is the heart, and the heart
is the seat of the understanding, which, (in human beings)
regulates every action." Euseb. Proeper. Evang., p 100.
The following passage of the geographer and philosopher,
Strabo, removes every doubt as to the identity of the ideas
of Moses and those of the heathen theologians.
"Moses, who was one of the Egyptian priests, taught his
followers that it was an egregious error to represent the
Deity under the form of animals, as the Egyptians did, or in
the shape of man, as was the practice of the Greeks and
Africans. That alone is the Deity, said he, which
constitutes heaven, earth, and every living thing; that
which we call the world, the sum of all things, nature; and
no reasonable person will think of representing such a being
by the image of any one of the objects around us. It is for
this reason, that, rejecting every species of images or
idols, Moses wished the Deity to be worshipped without
emblems, and according to his proper nature; and he
accordingly ordered a temple worthy of him to be erected,
etc. Geograph. lib. 16, p. 1104, edition of 1707.
The theology of Moses has, then, differed in no respect from
that of his followers, that is to say, from that of the
Stoics and Epicureans, who consider the Deity as the soul of
the world. This philosophy appears to have taken birth, or
to have been disseminated when Abraham came into Egypt (200
years before Moses), since he quitted his system of idols
for that of the god Yahouh; so that we may place its
promulgation about the seventeenth or eighteenth century
before Christ; which corresponds with what we have said
before.
As to the history of Moses, Diodorus properly represents it
when he says, lib. 34 and 40, "That the Jews were driven out
of Egypt at a time of dearth, when the country was full of
foreigners, and that Moses, a man of extraordinary prudence
seized this opportunity of establishing his religion in the
mountains of Judea." It will seem paradoxical to assert,
that the 600,000 armed men whom he conducted thither ought
to be reduced to 6,000; but I can confirm the assertion by
so many proofs drawn from the books themselves, that it will
be necessary to correct an error which appears to have
arisen from the mistake of the transcribers.
*** This was the monosyllable written on the gates of the
temple of Delphos. Plutarch has made it the subject of a
dissertation.
**** These are the literal expressions of the book of
Deuteronomy, chap. XXXII. "The works of Tsour are perfect."
Now Tsour has been translated by the word creator; its
proper signification is to give forms, and this is one of
the definitions of Osiris in Plutarch.
X. Religion of Zoroaster.
"Such also was Zoroaster; who, five centuries after Moses, and in the time
of David, revived and moralized among the Medes and Bactrians, the whole
Egyptian system of Osiris and Typhon, under the names Ormuzd and
Ahrimanes; who called the reign of summer, virtue and good; the reign of
winter, sin and evil; the renewal of nature in spring, creation of the
world; the conjunction of the spheres at secular periods, resurrection;
and the Tartarus and Elysium of the astrologers and geographers were named
future life, hell and paradise. In a word, he did nothing but consecrate
the existing dreams of the mystical system.
XI. Budsoism, or Religion of the Samaneans.
"Such again are the propagators of the dismal doctrine of the Samaneans;
who, on the basis of the Metempsychosis, have erected the misanthropic
system of self-denial, and of privations; who, laying it down as a
principle that the body is only a prison where the soul lives in an impure
confinement, that life is only a dream, an illusion, and the world only a
passage to another country, to a life without end, placed virtue and
perfection in absolute immobility, in the destruction of all sentiment, in
the abnegation of physical organs, in the annihilation of all our being;
whence resulted fasts, penances, macerations, solitude, contemplations,
and all the practices of the deplorable delirium of the Anchorites.
XII. Brahmism, or Indian System.
"And such, too, were the founders of the Indian System; who, refining
after Zoroaster on the two principles of creation and destruction,
introduced an intermediary principle, that of preservation, and on their
trinity in unity, of Brama, Chiven, and Vichenou, accumulated the
allegories of their ancient traditions, and the alembicated subtilities of
their metaphysics.
"These are the materials which existed in a scattered state for many
centuries in Asia; when a fortuitous concourse of events and
circumstances, on the borders of the Euphrates and the Mediterranean,
served to form them into new combinations.
XIII. Christianity, or the Allegorical Worship of the Sun, under the
cabalistical names of Chrish-en, or Christ, and Ye-sus or Jesus.
"In constituting a separate nation, Moses strove in vain to defend it
against the invasion of foreign ideas. An invisible inclination, founded
on the affinity of their origin, had constantly brought back the Hebrews
towards the worship of the neighboring nations; and the commercial and
political relations which necessarily existed between them, strengthened
this propensity from day to day. As long as the constitution of the state
remained entire, the coercive force of the government and the laws opposed
these innovations, and retarded their progress; nevertheless the high
places were full of idols; and the god Sun had his chariot and horses
painted in the palaces of the kings, and even in the temples of Yahouh;
but when the conquests of the sultans of Nineveh and Babylon had dissolved
the bands of civil power, the people, left to themselves and solicited by
their conquerors, restrained no longer their inclination for profane
opinions, and they were publicly established in Judea. First, the Assyrian
colonies, which came and occupied the lands of the tribes, filled the
kingdom of Samaria with dogmas of the Magi, which very soon penetrated
into the kingdom of Judea. Afterwards, Jerusalem being subjugated, the
Egyptians, the Syrians, the Arabs, entering this defenceless country,
introduced their opinions; and the religion of Moses was doubly mutilated.
Besides the priests and great men, being transported to Babylon and
educated in the sciences of the Chaldeans, imbibed, during a residence of
seventy years, the whole of their theology; and from that moment the
dogmas of the hostile Genius (Satan), the archangel Michael,* the ancient
of days (Ormuzd), the rebel angels, the battles in heaven, the immortality
of the soul, and the resurrection, all unknown to Moses, or rejected by
his total silence respecting them, were introduced and naturalized among
the Jews.
* "The names of the angels and of the months, such as
Gabriel, Michael, Yar, Nisan, etc., came from Babylon with
the Jews:" says expressly the Talmud of Jerusalem. See
Beousob. Hist. du Manich. Vol. II, p. 624, where he proves
that the saints of the Almanac are an imitation of the 365
angels of the Persians; and Jamblicus in his Egyptian
Mysteries, sect. 2, c. 3, speaks of angels, archangels,
seraphims, etc., like a true Christian.
"The emigrants returned to their country with these ideas; and their
innovation at first excited disputes between their partisans the
Pharisees, and their opponents the Saducees, who maintained the ancient
national worship; but the former, aided by the propensities of the people
and their habits already contracted, and supported by the Persians, their
deliverers and masters, gained the ascendant over the latter; and the Sons
of Moses consecrated the theology of Zoroaster.*
* "The whole philosophy of the gymnosophists," says Diogenes
Laertius on the authority of an ancient writer, "is derived
from that of the Magi, and many assert that of the Jews to
have the same origin." Lib. 1. c. 9. Megasthenes, an
historian of repute in the days of Seleucus Nicanor, and who
wrote particularly upon India, speaking of the philosophy of
the ancients respecting natural things, puts the Brachmans
and the Jews precisely on the same footing.
"A fortuitous analogy between two leading ideas was highly favorable to
this coalition, and became the basis of a last system, not less surprising
in the fortune it has had in the world, than in the causes of its
formation.
"After the Assyrians had destroyed the kingdom of Samaria, some judicious
men foresaw the same destiny for Jerusalem, which they did not fail to
predict and publish; and their predictions had the particular turn of
being terminated by prayers for a re-establishment and regeneration,
uttered in the form of prophecies. The Hierophants, in their enthusiasm,
had painted a king as a deliverer, who was to re-establish the nation in
its ancient glory; the Hebrews were to become once more a powerful, a
conquering nation, and Jerusalem the capital of an empire extended over
the whole earth.
"Events having realized the first part of these predictions, the ruin of
Jerusalem, the people adhered to the second with a firmness of belief in
proportion to their misfortunes; and the afflicted Jews expected, with the
impatience of want and desire, this victorious king and deliverer, who was
to come and save the nation of Moses, and restore the empire of David.
"On the other hand, the sacred and mythological traditions of preceding
times had spread through all Asia a dogma perfectly analogous. The cry
there was a great mediator, a final judge, a future saviour, a king, god,
conqueror and legislator, who was to restore the golden age upon earth,*
to deliver it from the dominion of evil, and restore men to the empire of
good, peace, and happiness. The people seized and cherished these ideas
with so much the more avidity, as they found in them a consolation under
that deplorable state of suffering into which they had been plunged by the
devastations of successive conquests, and the barbarous despotism of their
governments. This conformity between the oracles of different nations, and
those of the prophets, excited the attention of the Jews; and doubtless
the prophets had the art to compose their descriptions after the style and
genius of the sacred books employed in the Pagan mysteries. There was
therefore a general expectation in Judea of a great ambassador, a final
Saviour; when a singular circumstance determined the epoch of his coming.
* This is the reason of the application of the many Pagan
oracles to Jesus, and particularly the fourth eclogue of
Virgil, and the Sybilline verses so celebrated among the
ancients.
"It is found in the sacred books of the Persians and Chaldeans, that the
world, composed of a total revolution of twelve thousand, was divided into
two partial revolutions; one of which, the age and reign of good,
terminated in six thousand; the other, the age and reign of evil, was to
terminate in six thousand more.
"By these records, the first authors had understood the annual revolution
of the great celestial orb called the world, (a revolution composed of
twelve months or signs, divided each into a thousand parts), and the two
systematic periods, of winter and summer, composed each of six thousand.
These expressions, wholly equivocal and badly explained, having received
an absolute and moral, instead of a physical and astrological sense, it
happened that the annual world was taken for the secular world, the
thousand of the zodiacal divisions, for a thousand of years; and
supposing, from the state of things, that they lived in the age of evil,
they inferred that it would end with the six thousand pretended years.*
* We have already seen this tradition current among the
Tuscans; it was disseminated through most nations, and shows
us what we ought to think of all the pretended creations and
terminations of the world, which are merely the beginnings
and endings of astronomical periods invented by astrologers.
That of the year or solar revolution, being the most simple
and perceptible, served as a model to the rest, and its
comparison gave rise to the most whimsical ideas. Of this
description is the idea of the four ages of the world among
the Indians. Originally these four ages were merely the
four seasons; and as each season was under the supposed
influence of a planet, it bore the name of the metal
appropriated to that planet; thus spring was the age of the
sun, or of gold; summer the age of the moon, or of silver;
autumn the age of Venus, or of brass; and winter the age of
Mars, or of iron. Afterwards when astronomers invented the
great year of 25 and 36 thousand common years, which had for
its object the bringing back all the stars to one point of
departure and a general conjunction, the ambiguity of the
terms introduced a similar ambiguity of ideas; and the
myriads of celestial signs and periods of duration which
were thus measured were easily converted into so many
revolutions of the sun. Thus the different periods of
creation which have been so great a source of difficulty and
misapprehension to curious enquirers, were in reality
nothing more than hypothetical calculations of astronomical
periods. In the same manner the creation of the world has
been attributed to different seasons of the year, just as
these different seasons have served for the fictitious
period of these conjunctions; and of consequence has been
adopted by different nations for the commencement of an
ordinary year. Among the Egyptians this period fell upon
the summer solstice, which was the commencement of their
year; and the departure of the spheres, according to their
conjectures, fell in like manner upon the period when the
sun enters cancer. Among the Persians the year commenced at
first in the spring, or when the sun enters Aries; and from
thence the first Christians were led to suppose that God
created the world in the spring: this opinion is also
favored by the book of Genesis; and it is farther
remarkable, that the world is not there said to be created
by the God of Moses (Yahouh), but by the Elohim or gods in
the plural, that is by the angels or genii, for so the word
constantly means in the Hebrew books. If we farther observe
that the root of the word Elohim signifies strong or
powerful, and that the Egyptians called their decans strong
and powerful leaders, attributing to them the creation of
the world, we shall presently perceive that the book of
Genesis affirms neither more nor less than that the world
was created by the decans, by those very genii whom,
according to Sanchoniathon, Mercury excited against Saturn,
and who were called Elohim. It may be farther asked why the
plural substantive Elohim is made to agree with the singular
verb bara (the Elohim creates). The reason is that after the
Babylonish captivity the unity of the Supreme Being was the
prevailing opinion of the Jews; it was therefore thought
proper to introduce a pious solecism in language, which it
is evident had no existence before Moses; thus in the names
of the children of Jacob many of them are compounded of a
plural verb, to which Elohim is the nominative case
understood, as Raouben (Reuben), they have looked upon me,
and Samaonni (Simeon), they have granted me my prayer; to
wit, the Elohim. The reason of this etymology is to be
found in the religious creeds of the wives of Jacob, whose
gods were the taraphim of Laban, that is, the angels of the
Persians, and Egyptian decans.
"Now, according to calculations admitted by the Jews, they began to reckon
near six thousand years since the supposed creation of the world.* This
coincidence caused a fermentation in the public mind. Nothing was thought
of but the approaching end. They consulted the hierophants and the
mystical books, which differed as to the term; the great mediator, the
final judge, was expected and desired, to put an end to so many
calamities. This being was so much spoken of, that some person finally was
said to have seen him; and a first rumor of this sort was sufficient to
establish a general certainty. Popular report became an established fact:
the imaginary being was realized; and all the circumstances of
mythological tradition, being assembled around this phantom, produced a
regular history, of which it was no longer permitted to doubt.
* According to the computation of the Seventy, the period
elapsed consisted of about 5,600 years, and this computation
was principally followed. It is well known how much, in the
first ages of the church, this opinion of the end of the
world agitated the minds of men. In the sequel, the general
councils encouraged by finding that the general
conflagration did not come, pronounced the expectation that
prevailed heretical, and its believers were called
Millenarians; a circumstance curious enough, since it is
evident from the history of the gospels that Jesus Christ
was a Millenarian, and of consequence a heretic.
"These mythological traditions recounted that, in the beginning, a woman
and a man had by their fall introduced sin and misery into the world.
(Consult plate of the Astrological Heaven of the Ancients.)
"By this was denoted the astronomical fact, that the celestial virgin and
the herdsman (Bootes), by setting heliacally at the autumnal equinox,
delivered the world to the wintry constellations, and seemed, on falling
below the horizon, to introduce into the world the genius of evil,
Ahrimanes, represented by the constellation of the Serpent.*
* "The Persians," says Chardin, "call the constellation of
the serpent Ophiucus, serpent of Eve: and this serpent
Ophiucas or Ophioneus plays a similar part in the theology
of the Phoenicians," for Pherecydes, their disciple and the
master of Pythagoras, said "that Ophioneus Serpentinus had
been chief of the rebels against Jupiter." See Mars. Ficin.
Apol. Socrat. p. m. 797, col. 2. I shall add that ephah
(with ain) signifies in Hebrew, serpent.
These traditions related that the woman had decoyed and seduced the man.*
* In a physical sense to seduce, seducere, means only to
attract, to draw after us.
"And in fact, the virgin, setting first, seems to draw the herdsman after
her.
"That the woman tempted him by offering him fruit fair to the sight and
good to eat, which gave the knowledge of good and evil.
"And in fact, the Virgin holds in her hand a branch of fruit, which she
seems to offer to the Herdsman; and the branch, emblem of autumn, placed
in the picture of Mithra* between winter and summer, seems to open the
door and give knowledge, the key of good and evil.
* See this picture in Hyde, page 111, edition of 1760.
That this couple had been driven from the celestial garden, and that a
cherub with a flaming sword had been placed at the gate to guard it.
"And in fact, when the virgin and the herdsman fall beneath the horizon,
Perseus rises on the other side;* and this Genius, with a sword in his
hand, seems to drive them from the summer heaven, the garden and dominion
of fruits and flowers.
* Rather the head of Medusa; that head of a woman once so
beautiful, which Perseus cut off and which beholds in his
hand, is only that of the virgin, whose head sinks below the
horizon at the very moment that Perseus rises; and the
serpents which surround it are Orphiucus and the Polar
Dragon, who then occupy the zenith. This shows us in what
manner the ancients composed all their figures and fables.
They took such constellations as they found at the same time
on the circle of the horizon, and collecting the different
parts, they formed groups which served them as an almanac in
hieroglyphic characters. Such is the secret of all their
pictures, and the solution of all their mythological
monsters. The virgin is also Andromeda, delivered by
Perseus from the whale that pursues her (pro-sequitor).
That of this virgin should be born, spring up, an offspring, a child, who
should bruise the head of the serpent, and deliver the world from sin.
"This denotes the son, which, at the moment of the winter solstice,
precisely when the Persian Magi drew the horoscope of the new year, was
placed on the bosom of the Virgin, rising heliacally in the eastern
horizon; on this account he was figured in their astrological pictures
under the form of a child suckled by a chaste virgin,* and became
afterwards, at the vernal equinox, the ram, or the lamb, triumphant over
the constellation of the Serpent, which disappeared from the skies.
* Such was the picture of the Persian sphere, cited by Aben
Ezra in the Coelam Poeticum of Blaeu, p. 71. "The picture
of the first decan of the Virgin," says that writer.
"represents a beautiful virgin with flowing hair; sitting in
a chair, with two ears of corn in her hand, and suckling an
infant, called Jesus by some nations, and Christ in Greek."
In the library of the king of France is a manuscript in
Arabic, marked 1165, in which is a picture of the twelve
signs; and that of the Virgin represents a young woman with
an infant by her side: the whole scene indeed of the birth
of Jesus is to be found in the adjacent part of the heavens.
The stable is the constellation of the charioteer and the
goat, formerly Capricorn: a constellation called proesepe
Jovis Heniochi, stable of Iou; and the word Iou is found in
the name Iou-seph (Joseph). At no great distance is the ass
of Typhon (the great she-bear), and the ox or bull, the
ancient attendants of the manger. Peter the porter, is
Janus with his keys and bald forehead: the twelve apostles
are the genii of the twelve months, etc. This Virgin has
acted very different parts in the various systems of
mythology: she has been the Isis of the Egyptians, who said
of her in one of their inscriptions cited by Julian, the
fruit I have brought forth is the sun. The majority of
traits drawn by Plutarch apply to her, in the same manner as
those of Osiris apply to Bootes: also the seven principal
stars of the she-bear, called David's chariot, were called
the chariot of Osiris (See Kirker); and the crown that is
situated behind, formed of ivy, was called Chen-Osiris, the
tree of Osiris. The Virgin has likewise been Ceres, whose
mysteries were the same with those of Isis and Mithra; she
has been the Diana of the Ephesians; the great goddess of
Syria, Cybele, drawn by lions; Minerva, the mother of
Bacchus; Astraea, a chaste virgin taken up into heaven at
the end of a golden age; Themis at whose feet is the balance
that was put in her hands; the Sybil of Virgil, who descends
into hell, or sinks below the hemisphere with a branch in
her hand, etc.
That, in his infancy, this restorer of divine and celestial nature would
live abased, humble, obscure and indigent.
"And this, because the winter sun is abased below the horizon; and that
this first period of his four ages or seasons, is a time of obscurity,
scarcity, fasting, and want.
"That, being put to death by the wicked, he had risen gloriously; that he
had reascended from hell to heaven, where he would reign forever
"This is a sketch of the life of the sun; who, finishing his career at the
winter solstice, when Typhon and the rebel angels gain the dominion, seems
to be put to death by them; but who soon after is born again, and rises*
into the vault of heaven, where he reigns.
* Resurgere, to rise a second time, cannot signify to return
to life, but in a metaphorical sense; but we see continually
mistakes of this kind result from the ambiguous meaning of
the words made use of in ancient tradition.
"Finally, these traditions went so far as to mention even his astrological
and mythological names, and inform us that he was called sometimes Chris,
that is to say, preserver,* and from that, ye Indians, you have made your
god Chrish-en or Chrish-na; and, ye Greek and Western Christians, your
Chris-tos, son of Mary, is the same; sometimes he is called Yes, by the
union of three letters, which by their numerical value form the number
608, one of the solar periods.** And this, Europeans, is the name which,
with the Latin termination, is become your Yes-us or Jesus, the ancient
and cabalistic name attributed to young Bacchus, the clandestine son
(nocturnal) of the Virgin Minerva, who, in the history of his whole life,
and even of his death, brings to mind the history of the god of the
Christians, that is, of the star of day, of which they are each of them
the emblems."
* The Greeks used to express by X, or Spanish iota, the
aspirated ha of the Orientals, who said haris. In Hebrew
heres signifies the sun, but in Arabic the meaning of the
radical word is, to guard, to preserve, and of haris,
guardian, preserver. It is the proper epithet of Vichenou,
which demonstrates at once the identity of the Indian and
Christian Trinities, and their common origin. It is
manifestly but one system, which divided into two branches,
one extending to the east, and the other to the west,
assumed two different forms: Its principal trunk is the
Pythagorean system of the soul of the world, or Iou-piter.
The epithet piter, or father, having been applied to the
demi-ourgos of Plato, gave rise to an ambiguity which caused
an enquiry to be made respecting the son of this father. In
the opinion of the philosophers the son was understanding,
Nous and Logos, from which the Latins made their Verbum.
And thus we clearly perceive the origin of the eternal
father and of the Verbum his son, proceeding from him (Mens
Ex Deo nata, says Macrobius): the oenima or spiritus mundi,
was the Holy Ghost; and it is for this reason that Manes,
Pasilides, Valentinius, and other pretended heretics of the
first ages, who traced things to their source, said, that
God the Father was the supreme inaccessible light (that of
the heaven, the primum mobile, or the aplanes); the Son the
secondary light resident in the sun, and the Holy Ghost the
atmosphere of the earth (See Beausob. vol. II, p. 586):
hence, among the Syrians, the representation of the Holy
Ghost by a dove, the bird of Venus Urania, that is of the
air. The Syrians (says Nigidius de Germaico) assert that a
dove sat for a certain number of days on the egg of a fish,
and that from this incubation Venus was born: Sextus
Empiricus also observes (Inst. Pyrrh. lib. 3, c. 23) that
the Syrians abstain from eating doves; which intimates to us
a period commencing in the sign Pisces, in the winter
solstice. We may farther observe, that if Chris comes from
Harisch by a chin, it will signify artificer, an epithet
belonging to the sun. These variations, which must have
embarrassed the ancients, prove it to be the real type of
Jesus, as had been already remarked in the time of
Tertullian. "Many, says this writer, suppose with greater
probability that the sun is our God, and they refer us to
the religion of the Persians." Apologet. c. 16.
** See a curious ode to the sun, by Martianus Capella,
translated by Gebelin.
Here a great murmur having arisen among all the Christian groups, the
Lamas, the Mussulmans and the Indians called them to order, and the orator
went on to finish his discourse:
"You know at present," said he, "how the rest of this system was composed
in the chaos and anarchy of the three first centuries; what a multitude of
singular opinions divided the minds of men, and armed them with an
enthusiasm and a reciprocal obstinacy; because, being equally founded on
ancient tradition, they were equally sacred. You know how the government,
after three centuries, having embraced one of these sects, made it the
orthodox, that is to say, the pre-dominant religion, to the exclusion of
the rest; which, being less in number, became heretics; you know how and
by what means of violence and seduction this religion was propagated,
extended, divided, and enfeebled; how, six hundred years after the
Christian innovation, another system was formed from it and from that of
the Jews; and how Mahomet found the means of composing a political and
theological empire at the expense of those of Moses and the vicars of
Jesus.
"Now, if you take a review of the whole history of the spirit of all
religion, you will see that in its origin it has had no other author than
the sensations and wants of man; that the idea of God has had no other
type and model than those of physical powers, material beings, producing
either good or evil, by impressions of pleasure or pain on sensitive
beings; that in the formation of all these systems the spirit of religion
has always followed the same course, and been uniform in its proceedings;
that in all of them the dogma has never failed to represent, under the
name of gods, the operations of nature, and passions and prejudices of
men; that the moral of them all has had for its object the desire of
happiness and the aversion to pain; but that the people, and the greater
part of legislators, not knowing the route to be pursued, have formed
false, and therefore discordant, ideas of virtue and vice of good and
evil, that is to say, of what renders man happy or miserable; that in
every instance, the means and the causes of propagating and establishing
systems have exhibited the same scenes of passion and the same events;
everywhere disputes about words, pretexts for zeal, revolutions and wars
excited by the ambition of princes, the knavery of apostles, the credulity
of proselytes, the ignorance of the vulgar, the exclusive cupidity and
intolerant arrogance of all. Indeed, you will see that the whole history
of the spirit of religion is only the history of the errors of the human
mind, which, placed in a world that it does not comprehend, endeavors
nevertheless to solve the enigma; and which, beholding with astonishment
this mysterious and visible prodigy, imagines causes, supposes reasons,
builds systems; then, finding one defective, destroys it for another not
less so; hates the error that it abandons, misconceives the one that it
embraces, rejects the truth that it is seeking, composes chimeras of
discordant beings; and thus, while always dreaming of wisdom and
happiness, wanders blindly in a labyrinth of illusion and doubt."