W. L.
d'Azevedo, basing his opinions on extensive field work in the
area, contends that early estimates of Washo population were incorrect
and that modern figures based on these estimates are inaccurate. A contemporary
estimate, made by a resident journalist in 1881, was somewhat
over 3,000.
This statement
should not be considered as an indication of matrilineality
in Washo society. Freed and d'Azevedo, who have done extensive
work in kinship and social organization of this group, seemed to agree
that the Washo were loosely bilateral with certain formalized patrilineal
elements. However, because of fragile marriages, many Washo have had
a longer and closer association with their mothers' families than with
their fathers', or with those of any of their mothers' subsequent husbands.
Regular
Indian doctors were forbidden to treat members of their own
families, a prohibition which appears not to have extended to a non-shamanistic
curer.
Captain Jim is the only Washo whom the Washo generally accept as
having been a leader of the entire tribe. Other claimants to the title of
chief of the Washo are contemptuously discounted. There were in the
past a number of men, usually considered leaders of a “bunch” who were
called “captains” or, less often, “chiefs” because they dealt with the
white population. The entire institution of captain may well be a post-white
development.
The
concern for these particular graves may be in part motivated by
the fact that they are a focal point in a Washo land claim. Because of California
law concerning cemeteries, the Indians contend that the tourist
camp presently on the site is there illegally and that the land is theirs.
Thus far the camp operator has been enjoined from removing or desecrating
the graves, but the Indians' claim has not been considered.
This
kind of a statement was common and whenever it was made suggestions
of special power were made explicit later in the conversation,
or were implied by the attitude of the informant.
No matter how reluctant
aged Washo may have been to discuss other
aspects of the past, they became eloquent about any occasion on which
food was plentiful. They describe in minute detail the kinds and amount
of food at a feast although they cannot remember the time, place, or
those present.