The confederation of the island with the Dominion having been effected, in a manner hereafter to be described, and according to stipulation under the terms of union,—eight hundred thousand dollars having been placed at the disposal of the island government for the settlement of a question which, through the disgraceful supineness of successive imperial governments, had been a perpetual source of strife and bitter contention for a nearly century,—the government of the island, as a forlorn hope, resolved to take further action in order to ensure a settlement of the question, by introducing the land purchase act of 1875, which received the formal sanction of the governor-general of the Dominion. This act provided that commissioners should be appointed to determine the value of the various estates whose sale, under the provisions of the act, was to be rendered compulsory. The lieutenant-governor of the island was to appoint one commissioner; the governor-general of the Dominion another; and a third was to be appointed by each of the proprietors whose land was to be valued. As we write, the commissioners are sitting, and the value of the lands is being irrevocably determined. The measure, though one of absolute necessity,—so far as the local government and the interest of the tenants are concerned,—must be regarded as the most unconstitutional act that ever received imperial sanction. It may be safely affirmed, that its parallel is not to be found in the British Statute Book. In its principle, it is antagonistic to the fundamental rights of property, as universally recognized in civilized states. The act, as a precedent, will, doubtless, be cast in the teeth of the owners of British property by our modern communists, the tendency of whose views finds the solemn sanction of law in this measure. It is unjust to the landlord, inasmuch as it compels him to sell his land even when he deems it his interest to retain it; and it is unjust to the tenant, as it necessitates his paying, if he be desirous of securing the fee-simple of the land, a comparatively high price. But it is an act of governmental necessity, as further delay would greatly enhance the value of landed property, and thus render the prospects of the tenant still more unsatisfactory. Far better, however, that millions of pounds sterling were devoted by Great Britain to the compensation of the landlords and tenants of Prince Edward Island, than that so pernicious an act should disgrace the British Colonial Statute Book.
CHAPTER X.
Mr. James C. Pope and the Railway—Assimilation of the Currency—Confederation—Conference in Charlottetown—Sketch of Edward Whelan and T. H. Haviland—Opposition to Confederation—Resolutions in the Assembly—Offer of Terms to J. C. Pope—Further Proceedings—The Question of Confederation Resumed—Delegations to Ottawa—Messrs. Haythorne and Laird—Messrs. Pope, Haviland, and Howlan—Final Settlement of the Question.
To the Honorable James C. Pope belongs the honor of being the first to take legislative action of a commendably energetic character, in order to secure to the island admirable facilities for intercommunication by means of a railway. On the third of April, in the session of 1871, that gentleman submitted a resolution to the house of assembly, which was seconded by the attorney-general, Hon. Mr. Brecken, to the effect that the trade and exports of the island having much increased during the past few years, it was found impossible, in the absence of stone or gravel, to keep the roads in an efficient state of repair. It was contended that the construction and efficient maintenance of a line of railway through the island would greatly facilitate its trade, develop its resources, enlarge its revenue, and open more frequent and easy communication with the neighboring provinces and the United States. It was, therefore, proposed to introduce a bill authorizing the government to undertake the construction of a railway, to extend from Cascumpec to Georgetown, touching at Summerside and Charlottetown, and also branches to Souris and Tignish, at a cost not exceeding five thousand pounds, currency, the mile, including all the necessary appliances suitable for a good railroad, provided that the contractors would accept in payment the debentures of Prince Edward Island. The Honorable Mr. Sinclair proposed an amendment condemnatory of this resolution, on the ground that a general election for both branches of the legislature had recently taken place; that the question of constructing a railway was not then properly before the country; and that two petitions were before the house against the proposed undertaking, and none in its favor. On a division, Mr. Pope’s resolution was carried by seventeen to eleven votes. A committee, consisting of the Honorable Mr. Pope, the Honorable Mr. Howlan, the Honorable the Attorney General, the Honorable Mr. Perry, and Mr. Richards, was then appointed to prepare and bring in a bill in accordance with the resolution passed by the assembly. The bill was immediately presented, read a first time, and ordered to be read a second time on the following day. The bill was accordingly read a second time, and committed to a committee of the whole house,—Mr. Beer being chairman. On the main question being put, the measure was approved by eighteen to eleven votes. The report of the committee was then received, and the bill engrossed under the title of “An act to authorize the construction of a railway through Prince Edward Island.” Thus, in two days from the time of its introduction, the bill received the sanction of the assembly; and it may be safely affirmed that few measures have ever been passed by the representatives of the people of greater importance, as bearing on the material interests of the island. It is only fair to state that it was mainly through the tact, energy, and determination of Mr. James C. Pope that the scheme was carried to successful completion.
During this session an act was also passed for assimilating the currency of the island to that of the Dominion of Canada, by the introduction of a decimal system of keeping the public accounts. The act did not disturb the existing value of the current coins, but simply declared what their value should be in relation to the new system.
The question of a union of the North American Provinces was not prominently before the people of Prince Edward Island until 1864. Ten years previously, the subject had been discussed in the parliament of Nova Scotia by the parties of which Howe and Johnston were the leaders, when the latter gentleman moved a resolution favorable to union. In 1857, two members of the government of Nova Scotia had an interview with Mr. Labouchere, the colonial secretary, on the subject, when he intimated that, in the event of concurrence on the part of all the provinces, the home government would be prepared to consider any measure, with a view to the consummation of union, which might be agreed upon. Mr. Galt, in 1858, when a member of the Canadian administration, was an advocate for the consideration of the question; and, subsequently, a correspondence with the home government on the subject was opened by the Canadian government. But the official action which resulted in the consummation of union was taken in the assembly of Nova Scotia in 1861, when the provincial secretary moved that the lieutenant-governor of the province should be respectfully requested to put himself in communication with the colonial secretary, the governor-general, and the lieutenant-governors of the other North American Provinces, in order to ascertain the policy of Her Majesty’s government, and the sentiments of the other colonies, with a view to the consideration of the question. This resolution was unanimously adopted by the assembly, sent to the colonial office, and subsequently transmitted by the Duke of Newcastle to the governor-general, and to the lieutenant-governors of the several provinces. On the proceedings of the assembly, his grace remarked that if a union, either partial or complete, should hereafter be proposed, with the concurrence of all the provinces to be united, he was sure that the matter would be weighed in England by the public, by parliament, and by Her Majesty’s government with no other feeling than an anxiety to discern and to promote any course which might be most conducive to the prosperity, the strength, and the harmony of all the British communities in North America.
The desire of the home government to see a union of the North American Provinces consummated, having been thus indicated, a discussion of the question took place in the legislature of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island, in the sessions of 1864, which resulted in the appointment, by these provinces, of delegates, to meet in Charlottetown. In the assembly of Prince Edward Island there was considerable opposition to the idea of a legislative union, but the following resolution was passed by a majority: “That His Excellency the Lieutenant Governor be authorised to appoint delegates—not to exceed five—to confer with delegates who may be appointed by the government of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, for the purpose of discussing the expediency of a union of the three Provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island under one government and legislature, the report of the said delegates to be laid before the legislature of the colony before any action shall be taken in regard to the proposed question.”
In the year 1863 the two parties in the Canadian parliament were so equally balanced, that it was found impossible to conduct the business of the country with any degree of efficiency. The leading men of both parties accordingly agreed on a reconstruction, resolving with the concurrence of their supporters to unite, for the purpose of securing a confederation of all the British North American Provinces. The governor-general addressed a despatch to the lieutenant-governor of the maritime provinces, asking whether, at the coming conference at Charlottetown, a deputation from the Canadian Government would be received, in order to give the members of it an opportunity of expressing their views regarding the proposed union. An answer favorable to the proposal was returned. A deputation accordingly proceeded to Charlottetown. The whole of the delegates met on the first of September. Prince Edward Island being represented by the Honorables Colonel Gray, premier; Edward Palmer, attorney general; W. H. Pope, colonial secretary; George Coles, M. P. P., and A. A. Macdonald, M. L. C. The proceedings of the conference were not reported, but the late Mr. Whelan, in his published account of the proceedings, says “it was well understood that the proposal to unite the maritime provinces under one government and one legislature was deemed impracticable; but the opinion of the delegates was unanimous that a union upon a larger basis might be effected; and with the view of considering the feasibility of such a union in all its details, it was proposed by the Canadian ministers to hold a further conference at Quebec, with the consent of the governments of the lower provinces, and at such time as might be named by the governor-general. This arrangement was agreed to, and the conference suspended its deliberations.”
Before leaving Charlottetown, the delegates were entertained at a sumptuous banquet, by the executive council and some of the prominent citizens of Charlottetown. The entertainment was given in the Provincial Building, on the evening of the eighth of September. Speeches were delivered by a number of gentlemen, among whom were Lieutenant-governor Dundas, Hon. John Longworth, Hon. T. H. Haviland, and Frederick de St. Croix Brecken, Esq.
From Charlottetown the delegates proceeded to Halifax, where they were similarly entertained. Fredericton was next visited, and in Saint John the festivities of Charlottetown and Halifax were repeated. On the tenth of October the conference at Quebec was opened. Prince Edward Island being represented by the Honorables Colonel Gray, Edward Palmer, W. H. Pope, George Coles, T. H. Haviland, Edward Whelan, and A. A. Macdonald, which terminated on the twenty-seventh of October. From Quebec the delegates proceeded to Montreal, where they were hospitably entertained. At a public banquet given at Montreal, the Honorable Colonel Gray introduced the Honorable Edward Whelan, requesting him to respond in behalf of Prince Edward Island, when he delivered a telling and eloquent speech. We can only spare space for the concluding sentences: “It will be the duty,” said the speaker, “of the public men in each and every province, whose representatives are now in Canada, to educate the public mind up to their views. The task may be a tedious, difficult, and protracted one, but no great measure was ever accomplished, or worth much, unless surrounded with difficulties. Deferring reverently to the public opinion of his own province, he would cheerfully go amongst his people, and explaining it as well as he could, he would ask them to support a measure which he believed would enhance their prosperity. Few, and comparatively poor, as the people of Prince Edward Island may be now, its fertile fields and valleys are capable of supporting a population at least three times greater than it is at present. It was once designated the garden of the Saint Lawrence; and it was a valuable fishing station for Canada during the occupation of the French, under Montcalm. It still possesses all the qualities of a garden, and its rivers and bays still abound with fish. He desired that those great resources should become as well known now, and in the future, as they were in by-gone days; and regarding the advantages which modern improvements and institutions offered as auxiliaries to the natural resources of the colony, he was satisfied that she could not fail to become very prosperous and happy under the proposed confederation.”
The Honorable T. H. Haviland—who now holds the office of colonial secretary—replied to the toast of our sister colonies. “He desired to draw attention to some peculiar facts connected with the present movement. They might recollect that this was not the first time that states had met together to organize a constitution; for in times gone by the states of Holland had met to resist the tyranny of the Spanish Government; and the old thirteen states of America had also assembled under the cannon’s mouth, and the roar of artillery; but the peculiarity of this meeting was, that it was held in a time of peace, with the approbation, and he believed, with the sanction of Her Majesty; that the colonies might throw aside their swaddling clothes, to put on themselves the garb of manhood, and hand down to posterity the glorious privileges for which their ancestors contended from age to age in the old country, and which had been brought into these new countries under the protecting shadow of the flag that had braved a thousand years the battle and the breeze. Although Prince Edward Island had only eighty thousand inhabitants, principally engaged in agriculture, yet, small as it was, it did not come as a beggar to the conference doors. Its revenue was not certainly very great, but there was yet a surplus of about four thousand pounds sterling to the credit of the province, over and above the thirty-six thousand pounds it spent for the government last year. Thus it had not come as a pauper, but was honestly prepared to do something—all in its power—to organize, here in America, a constitutional monarchy, which should be able to spread those institutions in which there was the soul of liberty.”
The delegates proceeded afterwards to Ottawa and Toronto, where similar festive gatherings took place. But business was not neglected, as appears from the report subsequently published, which embodied the conclusions at which the delegates had arrived as the basis of the proposed confederation.
The report sets out with the declaration that the best interests and present and future prosperity of British North America would be promoted by a federal union, under the Crown of Great Britain, provided such union could be effected on principles just to the several provinces. In the federation of the British North American provinces, the system of government best adapted under existing circumstances to protect the diversified interests of the several provinces, and secure efficiency, harmony, and permanency in the working of the union, would be a general government charged with matters of common interest to the whole country, and local governments for each of the Canadas, and for the provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island, charged with the control of local matters in their respective sections,—provision being made for the admission into the union, on equitable terms, of Newfoundland, the North West Territory, British Columbia, and Vancouver. In framing a constitution for the general government, the conference, with a view to the perpetuation of the connection with the mother country, and to the promotion of the best interests of the people of these provinces, desired to follow the model of the British constitution, so far as circumstances would permit.
The proceedings of the conference were authenticated by the signatures of the delegates, and submitted by each delegation to its own government, and the chairman was authorised to submit a copy to the governor-general, for transmission to the secretary of state for the colonies. The governor-general (Lord Monck) lost no time in transmitting the resolutions adopted at Quebec to the imperial government, which were hailed with satisfaction by the government and press of Great Britain.
The Canadian legislature met in February, 1865, when the report of the convention was discussed in both branches of the legislature, and a resolution submitted to them, respectively, to the effect that an address should be presented to Her Majesty, praying that she might be pleased to cause a measure to be submitted to the imperial parliament for the purpose of uniting the colonies of Canada, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland, and Prince Edward Island in one government, with provisions based on the resolutions passed at Quebec. After protracted discussion, the resolutions were passed by large majorities. The scheme did not meet with the same degree of favor in New Brunswick; for an election having taken place before the question was discussed in the house, a large majority was returned opposed to confederation.
In Prince Edward Island the scheme of confederation was not received with any degree of favor by the people generally. Indeed, popular hostility to union found expression not unfrequently at public meetings. Early in February, 1865, a large meeting was held in Temperance Hall, at which the Honorable W. H. Pope, the colonial secretary,—who was always a decided unionist,—spoke effectively for an hour in its favor; but he was energetically opposed by Mr. David Laird and the Honorable Mr. Coles, who were regarded as two of the most able and prominent opponents of confederation. On the tenth of February, two large meetings were convened simultaneously. At one of these the Honorable Thomas H. Haviland delivered a carefully prepared opening address of some hours’ duration, in which he earnestly advocated union, of which he had always been a consistent supporter. He was followed by the Honorable Mr. Coles, Mr. Archibald McNeill, the Honorable George Beer, the Honorable D. Davies, and the Honorable Frederick Brecken,—the speeches of the two latter gentlemen being specially directed to an exposition of the deficiencies of the Quebec scheme as bearing on the interests of the island. [H] The other meeting was, at the outset, addressed by the Honorable Edward Palmer, who, according to the opinion of the anti-confederates, proved conclusively that confederation could not result in permanent benefit to Prince Edward Island. He was followed in stirring addresses by the Honorable Kenneth Henderson, the Honorable Joseph Hensley, and the Honorable J. Longworth. At this meeting the following resolution was proposed by Mr. Charles Palmer, and unanimously adopted: “That in the opinion of this meeting, the terms of union contained in the report of the Quebec conference—especially those laid down in the clauses relating to representation and finance—are not such as would be either liberal or just to Prince Edward Island, and that it is highly inexpedient that said report be adopted by our legislature.”
The assembly was convened on the twenty-eighth of February, 1865, and on the twenty-fourth of March the colonial secretary (the Honorable W. H. Pope) moved a series of resolutions approving of the terms proposed at the conference held at Quebec. An amendment in opposition to their adoption was submitted by the Honorable James C. Pope, and on a vote being taken, only five members voted for confederation, while twenty-three were antagonistic to its consummation.
During the session of the following year (1866) the question was again introduced to the house by a message of His Excellency the Lieutenant-Governor, transmitting a despatch from Mr. Cardwell, the imperial colonial secretary, on the subject of a federation of the British North American Provinces, when a resolution, more hostile to union than the amendment already specified, was, on the motion of the Honorable J. C. Pope, submitted to the house. It was moved, “That, even if a union of the continental provinces of British North America should have the effect of strengthening and binding more closely together those provinces, or advancing their material interests, this house cannot admit that a federal union of the North American Provinces and colonies, which would include Prince Edward Island, could ever be accomplished on terms that would prove advantageous to the interests and well-being of the people of this island, separated as it is, and must ever remain, from the neighboring provinces, by an immovable barrier of ice, for many months in the year; and this house deems it to be its sacred and imperative duty to declare and record its conviction, as it now does, that any federal union of the North American colonies that would embrace this island would be as hostile to the feelings and wishes, as it would be opposed to the best and most vital interests of its people.” The Honorable James Duncan seconded this resolution. An amendment was proposed by the Honorable Edward Whelan, seconded by the solicitor general (the Honorable T. H. Haviland, now a senator of the Dominion), to the effect that there should be no vote passed by the legislature as to the confederation of the provinces until the people should be first afforded an opportunity of pronouncing their judgment on the question at a general election. Mr. Pope’s motion was carried by twenty-one votes to seven for the amendment. An address to Her Majesty the Queen, based on the action of the assembly, was subsequently adopted by the assembly and forwarded for presentation at the foot of the throne.
In the autumn of 1866, Mr. J. C. Pope went to England, and an informal offer was made through him by the delegates from the other provinces, then in London settling the terms of confederation, to grant the island eight hundred thousand dollars, as indemnity for the loss of territorial revenue, and for the purchase of the proprietors’ estates, on condition of the island entering the confederation. But the people were not at this time in a temper to entertain the proposition for a moment.
In the autumn of 1869, the island was visited by Sir John Young, the governor-general of British North America. He was accompanied by several of his ministers, who discussed informally, with members of the government, the subject of a union of the island with the Dominion of Canada. On the eighteenth of December, 1869, the governor-general transmitted to Sir Robert Hodgson, the administrator of the government of Prince Edward Island, a minute of the privy council of Canada, relating to the question of a political union of the island with the Dominion. That minute was based on a memorandum dated the eleventh of December, 1869, from Sir George Cartier and Messrs. Tilley and Kenny, who took part in the informal discussion just alluded to, and who now submitted, for the approval of their colleagues in the Dominion ministry, the conditions on which they thought the island should be admitted to the union. These conditions received the formal sanction of the Dominion government, and were duly forwarded to Sir Robert Hodgson, who submitted them to a committee of the executive council, who, on the seventh of January, 1870, adopted the following minute: “The committee having under consideration the report of a committee of the privy council of Canada, wherein certain proposals for a union of Prince Edward Island with the Dominion are set forth, resolve, that inasmuch as said terms do not comprise a full and immediate settlement of the land tenures and indemnity from the imperial government for loss of territorial revenues, the committee cannot recommend said terms to the consideration of their constituents and the public.” This minute was signed by the Honorable R. P. Haythorne, the leader of the government (now a senator of the Dominion), and his colleagues. The government subsequently presented a more detailed statement of their objections to the basis of union. These documents were forwarded to Earl Granville, the colonial secretary; and, on the seventh of March, 1870, addressing his honor the administrator, he said: “It appears to me that the government of Prince Edward Island will not act wisely if they allow themselves to be diverted from the practical consideration of their own real interests, for the sake of keeping alive a claim against the imperial government which, it is quite certain, will never be acknowledged.”
The subject of union came again prominently before the assembly in the session of 1870, on taking into consideration the messages of his honor the administrator of the government, transmitting various despatches and papers. The Honorable Mr. Kelly reported that the committee recommended that the house should adopt a resolution to the effect that the people’s representatives felt it to be their duty to oppose a union with the Dominion of Canada, and to express their opinion that the people of the island, while loyal in their attachment to the Crown and government of Great Britain, were, nevertheless, almost unanimously opposed to any change in the constitution of the colony,—which resolution was carried by nineteen to four votes.
The next movement of importance in reference to the question of union was taken by the government, of which the Honorable Mr. Haythorne was the leader, on the second of January, 1873, when the executive council adopted an important minute containing new propositions, with a view to the union of the island with the Dominion of Canada. It was stated in the minute, that if Canada would accord liberal terms of union, the government of Prince Edward Island would be prepared to advise an immediate dissolution of the house, in order to give the people an opportunity of deciding whether they would go into confederation, or submit to the taxation required for railway purposes. The document was forwarded to the governor-general and submitted to the privy council of the Dominion, who suggested that a deputation should be sent to Ottawa by the government of the island, for the purpose of holding a conference on the subject of the proposed union. The Honorable Mr. Haythorne and the Honorable David Laird were accordingly appointed as delegates, representing the interests of the island; but they were not authorised to pledge either the government or the colony to any proposition that might be made by the Dominion of Canada. The delegation had several interviews with a sub-committee of the council, when the various questions connected with the important subject were fully discussed; and a minute of the terms and conditions mutually agreed to was finally drawn up. On the twelfth of March the governor-general sent a telegraphic despatch, evidently for the purpose of confirming the report of Messrs. Haythorne and Laird, intimating his ministers’ opinion,—in which he expressed his own concurrence,—that “no additional concession would have any chance of being accepted by the parliament of Canada.”
On the seventh of March the lieutenant-governor dissolved the house of assembly; and on the twenty-seventh of April the new house met, when the lieutenant-governor, in his opening speech, said that papers relative to the proposed union of the island with the Dominion of Canada would be laid before the house. Having dissolved the house in order that this important question might be submitted to the people at the polls, he now invited the representatives of the people to bestow on the question their careful consideration, expressing the earnest hope of the imperial government, that the island would not lose this opportunity of union with her sister provinces.
On the twenty-eighth of April the question was vigorously discussed by Mr. J. C. Pope and Mr. Laird; and on the second day of May, Mr. A. C. McDonald reported, that the committee had come to a resolution to the effect that the terms and conditions proposed did not secure to the island a sum sufficient to defray the indispensable requirements of its local government; that the strong objections hitherto entertained by the people of the island to confederation having been much modified, and the present house of assembly, feeling anxious to meet the desire of the imperial government to unite under one government all the British possessions in America, was willing to merge the interests of the island with those of the Dominion on terms just and reasonable,—such as would not involve the people in direct local taxation for objects for which the ordinary revenue had hitherto enabled them to provide. The resolution further proposed to authorise the lieutenant-governor to appoint delegates to proceed to Ottawa to confer with the government of the Dominion on the subject.
To this resolution, the Honorable David Laird moved an amendment, which was seconded by the Honorable B. Davies, to the effect that the house should appoint a committee of seven to prepare an address to the Queen, praying Her Majesty in council to pass an order in council, in conformity with the one hundred and forty-sixth section of the British North America Act, uniting Prince Edward Island with the Dominion of Canada, on the terms and conditions approved of in the minute of the privy council of Canada, on the tenth of March, 1873. The question having been put, the original resolution was carried by sixteen to ten votes.
Messrs. James C. Pope, T. H. Haviland, and George W. Howlan having been appointed delegates by the lieutenant-governor, proceeded to Ottawa for the purpose of conferring with the Dominion government on the subject of the proposed union. On the seventh of May they had an interview with the governor-general on the subject of their mission, and immediately afterwards they attended a formal meeting of the privy council. A committee of the council, consisting of Sir John A. McDonald, the Honorables Messieurs Tilley, Tupper, and Langevin were then appointed to confer with the delegates, who had drawn up a memorandum which they submitted to the committee. In that memorandum the delegates proposed to accept, as the basis of union, the offer made in 1869 by the Dominion government, namely, two hundred and forty-one thousand dollars a year for revenue, provided the Dominion government would assume the cost of the railway, as well as that of the proposed branch to Port Hill. These terms were not acceptable to the committee of the privy council. A compromise was, however, ultimately effected, and on the fifteenth of May a memorandum, embodying terms mutually approved, was signed by the committee and the delegates.
The delegates returned immediately to Charlottetown, and the terms and conditions of the proposed union, which were substantially those procured by Messrs. Haythorne and Laird, as agreed to at Ottawa, were submitted to the house of assembly, then in session. The principal terms and conditions were the following: that the island should, on entering the union, be entitled to incur a debt equal to fifty dollars a head of its population, as shown by the census returns of 1871; that is to say, four millions seven hundred and one thousand and fifty dollars; that the island, not having incurred debts equal to the sum just mentioned, should be entitled to receive, by half-yearly payments in advance, from the general government, interest at the rate of five per cent. per annum on the difference, from time to time, between the actual amount of its indebtedness and the amount of indebtedness authorised; that, as the government of Prince Edward Island held no lands from the Crown, and consequently enjoyed no revenue from that source for the construction and maintenance of public works, the Dominion government should pay, by half-yearly instalments, in advance, to the government of Prince Edward Island, forty-five thousand dollars yearly, less five per cent. upon any sum not exceeding eight hundred thousand dollars, which the Dominion government might advance to the Prince Edward Island government for the purchase of land now held by the large proprietors; that, in consideration of the transfer to the parliament of Canada of the powers of taxation, the following sums should be paid yearly by Canada to Prince Edward Island, for the support of the government and legislature: that is to say, thirty thousand dollars, and an annual grant equal to eighty cents per head of its population, as shown by the census returns of 1871,—namely, ninety-four thousand and twenty-one,—both by half-yearly payments in advance,—such grant of eighty cents per head to be augmented in proportion to such increase of population of the island as might be shown by each decennial census, until the population amounted to four hundred thousand, at which rate such grant should thereafter remain,—it being understood that the next census should be taken in the year 1881. The Dominion likewise assumed all the charges for the following services: the salary of the lieutenant-governor, the salaries of the judges of the superior courts and of the district or county courts, the charges in respect to the department of customs, the postal department, the protection of the fisheries, the provision for the militia, the lighthouses, shipwrecked crews, quarantine, and marine Hospitals, the geological survey, and the penitentiary. The Dominion government also assumed the railway, which was then under contract. The main resolutions, on the motion of Mr. J. C. Pope, seconded by Mr. David Laird, were carried by twenty-seven votes to two. The house of assembly then unanimously agreed to an address to Her Majesty the Queen, praying that Her Majesty would be graciously pleased to unite Prince Edward Island with the Dominion of Canada on the terms and conditions contained in the said address. The legislative action necessary to consummate the union of Prince Edward Island with the Dominion of Canada being thus completed, its political destiny was united to that of the already confederated provinces on the first of July, 1873.
It may seem strange, to one unacquainted with the facts, that so great a change in public sentiment in regard to union should have been effected in so brief a period. The solution of the problem is to be found mainly in the circumstance, that the mercantile community was afraid of a monetary crisis, consequent on the liabilities of the island in connection with the railway, and that the only satisfactory way of getting out of the difficulty appeared to be the union of the island, on liberal terms, with the Dominion of Canada. Fidelity to historical accuracy constrains us to say that the final settlement of the terms was in no small measure attributable to the able manner in which Messrs. Haythorne and Laird acquitted themselves when delegates at Ottawa; and it must further be stated, to the credit of these gentlemen, that they rose, when occasion required, above party prejudice, and communicated their desire to the Dominion government that further concessions should, if possible, be granted to the new delegates, so that the union might be effected without delay. But it must not, at the same time, be forgotten that the government of which Mr. J. C. Pope was the leader obtained better terms than those conceded to the previous delegation, and that to them belongs the merit, in a great measure, of bringing the question to a final solution.
CHAPTER XI.
Biographical Sketches:—Bishop McEachern—Rev. Donald McDonald—Rev. Dr. Kier—Hon. T. H. Haviland—Hon. E. Whelan—Hon. James Yeo—Hon. George Coles—James D. Haszard.
Among the early settlers of the island, prominent alike because of his aptitude for his position and the dignity with which he filled it, is the venerable figure of Bishop McEachern. While yet in early boyhood, about the year 1775, he was sent by the Scottish Bishop, John McDonald, to the Scotch Ecclesiastical College at Valladolid, in Spain. Having finished his studies there, he was ordained priest, and returned to Scotland, where he worked as a missionary for five years, under the Right Reverend Bishop Alexander McDonald. He arrived on the island either in August or September of 1790, and took up his residence at Savage Harbor. The church at Scotchfort was then the only catholic church on the island, and missionary duties were discharged at the residences of individuals in different parts of the colony. He acted as road commissioner, and laid out all the roads in the eastern portion of King’s County. His assistant in this duty was a Presbyterian clergyman,—the Reverend William Douglas. He was a man of such a stamp as sometimes we find, under severe difficulties, executing work so arduous that it seems only the language of truth to call his deeds heroic. He was, in his day, the only catholic priest on the island. His flock was widely scattered. Roads were few, and travelling, always difficult, was often attended with danger. But neither difficulty nor danger could daunt the zeal of the missionary. Now in his wagon, now in his boat or sleigh, he visited the remotest settlements. Everywhere he was welcomed, both by catholic and protestant. There are yet living protestants who received the waters of baptism from the hands of the good bishop. Among his catholic flock he was at once pastor and judge. He decided differences, he settled disputes, and his verdict was, in almost every case, gracefully acquiesced in. The kindness of his nature and his shrewd forethought fitted him admirably for the duties of a missionary among early settlers, struggling with the countless difficulties of a rigid climate and a new country. One little trait recorded of him gives us a glimpse of the thoughtful beneficence of his character. He was in the habit of hanging up buckets near the springs by the roadside, in order to enable travellers to water their horses on their journeys. The same benevolence permeated all his actions, and his hospitality was unbounded. In every settlement he had a fixed place, where he resided until he had performed his priestly duties among his flock. These duties must at one time have been very onerous, for he was bishop not only of Prince Edward Island, but also of New Brunswick. He was the second English-speaking catholic priest who came to the island.
Few names call up warmer feelings of respect than that of Bishop McEachern. Full of years and wearied out with labor, he died at his residence, near Saint Andrews. He was laid in the old chapel; but, a few years ago, the remains were removed to the new church, where they rest within the sanctuary.
The Reverend Donald McDonald died in 1867. He was born in Perthshire, Scotland, on the first of January, 1783; was educated at the University of Saint Andrews; and was ordained a minister of the Church of Scotland in 1816. He labored as a missionary in the Highlands until 1824, when he emigrated to Cape Breton. Here he preached two years. In 1826 he came to the island, and commenced his labors in the spirit of the true evangelist. To him, the toil of travelling over the country and ministering to the destitute was the highest pleasure. Multitudes flocked to hear him preach. In barns, dwelling-houses, schoolhouses, and in the open air he proclaimed his commission to eager hundreds. Here and there he organized his bands of workers and ordained elders. As years rolled on, his interest in his great work increased, and great success crowned his efforts. Spacious and elegant churches began to take the place of rude shanties. His people grew in numbers, in wealth, in respectability, and in love for their minister. To have him as a guest, or to drive him from one of his stations to another, was the highest honor.
His eloquence was of a high order. Before commencing his sermon he generally gave an introductory address, in which he would refer to the national, political, and religious questions of the day, and comment freely on them. His sermons were masterpieces of logical eloquence. He would begin in a rather low conversational tone; but, as he proceeded, his voice would become stronger. Then the whole man would preach,—tongue, countenance, eyes, feet, hands, body,—all would grow eloquent! The audience would unconsciously become magnetized, convicted, and swayed at the speaker’s will. Some would cry aloud, some would fall prostrate in terror, while others would clap their hands, or drop down as if dead. Seldom has such pulpit power been witnessed since the preaching of Wesley, Whitfield, and Edward Irving.
But it must not be supposed that the abundance of Mr. McDonald’s labors as a preacher prevented him from giving attention to study. Far from it. His intellect was too strong and too vigorous to rest. His pen was ever busy. He was profoundly read in philosophy. He was deeply versed in ancient and ecclesiastical history. He excelled in Biblical exegesis. No superficial thinker was he. The pen of no one but a master could produce his treatises on “The Millennium,” “Baptism,” and “The Plan of Salvation.” He greatly admired the Hebrew and Greek languages. The Psalms of David, Isaiah’s Prophecies, and Solomon’s Songs were his delight. He was a graceful writer of English verse, an excellent singer, and played well on the flute. He published several collections of his poems and hymns. In the later years of his life one of his hymns was always sung at every service, set to some wild strain of his native Scotland, such as “The Campbells are coming,” or “The Banks and Braes o’ Bonny Doon.”
To say that Mr. McDonald was faultless, would be to say that he was more than human. To say that, as a great moral reformer, he had no enemies, would be to say that he was a toady and a time-server. He was a brave man. He had strong self-reliance, and still stronger faith in God. He attacked vices with giant blows. Woe to the opponent who crossed his pathway! He had rare conversational powers. His spirits were always good. He knew the circumstances of every family in his widely-scattered flock, and remembered the names of all the children. He had no certain dwelling-place, no certain stipend, and bestowed all he got on works of charity. He was rather below medium height, stout, and powerfully built. He was hale and vigorous-looking to the last. His dress, appearance, and manners always bespoke the cultured Christian gentleman. He was never married.
In 1861 his health began to fail rapidly. It was thought he would not recover. He wrote epistles to his congregations commending them to God. But he rallied, and was able, with varying strength, to labor six years longer. More than ever did his ministrations breathe the spirit of the Great Teacher. He was again brought low. He was at the house of Mr. McLeod, of Southport. He felt that his end was near,—that his life-work was over; and a great work it was. He had built fourteen churches; he had registered the baptism of two thousand two hundred children, and had baptized perhaps as many more not registered; he had married more people than any living clergyman; he had prayed beside thousands of deathbeds; he had a parish extending from Bedeque to Murray Harbor, and from Rustico to Belle Creek; and he had five thousand followers, more attached to their great spiritual leader than ever were Highland clansmen to their chief. But he was as humble as a child. To God he gave the glory for all. He retained his faculties, and was glad to see his old friends at his bedside. Many came from far and near to take their last farewell and receive the dying blessing of the venerable patriarch. He sank gradually, suffering no pain, and on Friday, the twenty-second of February, in the eighty-fifth year of his age and the fifty-first of his ministry, he breathed his last.
The place of interment was the Uigg Murray Harbor Road churchyard, eighteen miles distant from Charlottetown. The funeral was the largest ever witnessed in the colony. All classes united in paying the last tribute of respect to the honored dead. The cortege numbered over three hundred and fifty sleighs. As the great procession moved down through the country, at the roadsides and at the doors and windows of the houses might be seen old men weeping, and women and children sobbing as if they had lost a father; and in the presence of a vast assemblage, near the church where his eloquent voice had so often melted listening thousands, and where he had so often celebrated, at the yearly sacrament, the Saviour’s death, the remains of the Reverend Donald McDonald were laid to rest. A costly monument marks the spot. [I]
Amongst the first-class representative ministers of the Presbyterian body in Prince Edward Island, we may safely place the Reverend Dr. Kier, who was born in the village of Bucklyvie, in the parish of Kippen, Scotland, in the year 1779. He was educated at Glasgow College, studied theology under Professor Bruce, of Whitburn, and was licensed by the associate or antiburgher Presbytery of Glasgow about the beginning of the year 1808, and, in the autumn of that year, arrived as a missionary on the island, under the auspices of the General Associate Synod in Scotland. In 1810, Dr. Kier settled in Princetown, having been ordained in June of that year. This was the first organized Presbyterian congregation on the island. The call to Dr. Kier was subscribed by sixty-four persons, embracing nearly all the heads of families and male adults of the Presbyterian population in Princetown Royalty, New London, Bedeque, and the west side of Richmond Bay; and when the jubilee of the venerable doctor was held, in 1858, only fourteen of the number who signed the call were living. There is not one of the old Presbyterian congregations on the island, whether then in connection with the Scottish Establishment, the Free Church, or the Presbyterian Church of Nova Scotia, which did not, to some extent, enjoy his missionary labors, or experience his fostering care in its infancy. In most of them, Dr. McGregor planted; but he watered, while others have reaped.
Dr. McCulloch having died in the year 1843, Dr. Kier was, at the meeting of Synod held in the following summer, chosen his successor as theological tutor. “We have sat under men of greater originality of thought,” writes one who knew him well,—“men who impressed us more deeply with a sense of their intellectual power,—but we never sat under one who produced deeper impressions of moral goodness, nor one who, in the handling of the great themes of Christian doctrine, presented them more as great practical realities.”
When the jubilee, to which we have already referred, took place, the whole country round poured forth a stream of carriages and horsemen. Tables for tea had been spread for four hundred and fifty guests, and these were filled four times, and part of them five times. It may be stated, as indicative of the estimation in which Dr. Kier was held, that it was calculated that three thousand persons were then present to do him well-earned honor. The address delivered by Dr. Kier on that occasion was as chaste and modest in expression as it was deeply interesting in matter, and his hearers little imagined that the venerable speaker, who then appeared in good health, was destined, in two months and two days, to rest from his labors. The memory of the just is blessed.
The Honorable Thomas Heath Haviland, Senior, was born at Cirencester, in the County of Gloucester, England, on the thirtieth of April, 1796. More than fifty years previous to his death, Mr. Haviland came to Charlottetown, and entered upon the duties of an office to which he had been appointed by the Prince Regent. In the year 1823—the last year of the administration of lieutenant-governor Smith—he was appointed a member of His Majesty’s executive council. The soundness of his judgment, his prudence, moderation, and courtly manners at once gave him influence at the council board; and for upwards of a quarter of a century—from the days of Colonel Sir John Ready until the stormy times of Sir Henry Vere Huntley, which immediately preceded the introduction into the colony of responsible government—his influence was paramount. In 1824 he was appointed assistant judge of the supreme court. From 1830 until 1839 he held the office of treasurer, which, in this year, he resigned for the office of colonial secretary. In 1839 the legislative council was separated from the executive council, and, by the Queen, Mr. Haviland was appointed its first president. On the introduction of responsible government, in 1851, he retired from office, and shortly after, with his family, visited England. His attachment to the island induced him to return to it, after a comparatively short absence. At the time of his death he was Mayor of Charlottetown,—having been annually elected to that office from 1857. He was also president of the Bank of Prince Edward Island. During his long official career he discharged his public duties with ability and dignity.
In private life he was remarkable for his generous hospitality and urbanity, for his kindly disposition and the constancy of his friendship. He was ever ready to listen to all who sought his counsel or assistance, and very many were the recipients of both. Time appeared to have laid its hand gently upon him. He was never known to the world as an ailing man. His erect figure, firm step, and good spirits gave promise of a long continuance of life, when a sudden attack, indicating severe organic derangement, confined him to his room. After a few months of suffering, which he bore with decorous fortitude, and during which he exhibited the most thoughtful concern for those who were in immediate attendance upon him, as well as for the more intimate of his friends who were absent, he passed away on the morning of Tuesday, the eighteenth of June, 1867, at the age of seventy-two years and two months. “The fine old English gentleman,” said the Islander, “the fond father, the wise and prudent counsellor, the useful and honored citizen has been laid in the grave, leaving a memory which will long be cherished and revered in this the land of his adoption.”
At this time the Honorable Edward Whelan was the correspondent, in Charlottetown, of the Montreal Gazette. Though politically opposed to Mr. Haviland, he alluded, in a letter to the Gazette,—which was published on the fifth of July, 1867,—to the deceased gentleman in the following touching terms: “The vacancy in the mayoralty is caused by the demise of the Honorable T. H. Haviland. He was the representative man of the old conservative party. Without brilliant talents, his judgment was of the highest order; he filled every situation in the colony to which a colonist could aspire, short of the gubernatorial chair; his manners to friend and opponent were always the essence of dignity, urbanity, and courtesy; and, passing through much of the contention of political life, leaving his impress on our small society, by his many useful labors, he was singularly fortunate, by his kindly nature, in disarming all opponents of the shadow of rancorous hostility.”
The Honorable Edward Whelan died at his residence, in Charlottetown, on the tenth of December, 1867, at the comparatively early age of forty-three. He was born in County Mayo, Ireland, in 1824, and received the rudiments of education in his native town. At an early age he emigrated to Halifax, Nova Scotia, where, shortly after his arrival, he entered the printing-office of the Honorable Joseph Howe, then a newspaper publisher in that city. Here he gave such proofs of that great facility for newspaper writing which distinguished him in after life that he was occasionally employed to write editorial articles for Mr. Howe’s newspaper during the absence or illness of the latter. At the age of eighteen he came to Prince Edward Island, which was then ruled by parties who could scarcely be said to be amenable to public opinion. Mr. Whelan, ranging himself on the side of the people, threw the weight of his influence as a journalist into the struggle for popular rights.
In 1851, Mr. Whelan married Miss Mary Major Hughes, daughter of Mr. George A. Hughes, of Her Majesty’s Commissariat Department at Halifax, by whom he had two daughters—who died some time previous to his own decease—and one son,—an excellent youth, who perished by a boat accident in Charlottetown harbor, on Dominion Day, in the current year.
Apart from Mr. Whelan’s oratorical power,—in which he excelled,—the great lever of public opinion, so powerful throughout the British dominions, obeyed his masterly hand as often as any fair occasion arose to resort to its agency. His political opponents will acknowledge that he never abused the power of the press, and that he knew how to combine a singularly consistent political career with conciliatory manners. Edward Whelan’s nature revolted from any mean or vindictive action. He neither bullied his opponents nor begged favors; he relied upon the strong innate love of justice of every intelligent mind; and, although he died comparatively young, he lived long enough to see, to a large extent, the results of his labors in the extension of civil liberty.
Mr. Whelan was a Roman catholic. The writer of a sketch of his life, which appeared in the Examiner, says that “his words and thoughts, in the hour of death, were those of a Christian gentleman.” The author of this work had the pleasure, in the autumn of 1867, of having an interview of several hours’ duration with the deceased gentleman, during which topics connected with general literature were freely discussed, and he parted with him retaining a high opinion of his literary ability, as well as of the extent of his knowledge.
At Port Hill, on the twenty-fifth of August, 1868, died the Honorable James Yeo, in the eightieth year of his age. The deceased gentleman was a native of Devonshire, England, and was born in the year 1788. He emigrated to Prince Edward Island about fifty years previous to his death. He, consequently, was then about thirty years of age. On his arrival, he obtained a situation in connection with the firm of Chanter & Company, who were doing business in shipbuilding at Port Hill. Being a young man of good habits and business talent, he secured the confidence of his employers. He had charge of the company’s books, and astonished everybody by his remarkable powers in mental arithmetic. The Messrs. Chanter having resolved to remove to England, assigned their outstanding debts to Mr. Yeo, as remuneration for what they owed him. With the small capital thus placed at his command, as the fruit of honest industry, he commenced trading and shipbuilding, which he prosecuted with remarkable success. Firmness, punctuality, and honesty were the characteristics of his business life.
Mr. Yeo entered public life in the year 1839, and from that period till his death lost but one election. He was no orator, but stated his views on the questions before the house of assembly in a few terse Saxon terms,—always strictly to the point. As a legislator, he was worth a dozen frothy orators. He died deeply regretted by a wide circle friends.
For the following brief sketch of the Honorable George Coles, we are indebted to an admirable biography of the deceased gentleman from the pen of Mr. Henry Lawson, and regret that the space at our disposal does not admit of the insertion of the entire production, which is highly creditable to the literary ability of the writer: The Honorable George Coles was born in Prince Edward Island on the twentieth of September, 1810. He was the eldest son of James and Sarah Coles. In his boyhood, Mr. Coles profited by such educational advantages as the place of his birth afforded. In 1829, when he was just entering manhood, he went to England, where he remained four years. During his stay there, he married Miss Mercy Haine, on the fourteenth of August, 1833, at East Penard Church, Somerset. Shortly after his marriage, Mr. Coles returned to the island, and commenced the business of brewer and distiller. A man of his active mind and wide sympathies could not remain long in the obscurity of private life. His influence soon began to be felt and his ability recognized. In the summer of 1842, he was elected a representative of the first district of Queen’s County in the house of assembly. Seldom has any man entered public life under greater disadvantages. He was comparatively a poor man; his education was limited; and, at a time when family influence appeared to be absolutely necessary to advancement in public life, he had no powerful connections. So prominent, however, and so powerful did he become, that it was deemed expedient to appoint him a member of the government. He soon resigned his seat at the council board, and we find him, in 1848, on the opposition benches, a strenuous advocate for the introduction of responsible government.
In 1848 Mr. Coles paid a visit to the United States. When there, he became convinced of the great importance of reciprocity to the people of the island. In Boston and other cities of the great republic he met many island men who were struggling with the difficulties incident to the want of education, and it is said that he then and there determined to free his countrymen from the disability of ignorance, by establishing a system of free schools on the island. He marked the working of the machinery of popular education in the States, and, as soon as he returned home, set about framing the island education law.
In those movements which were necessary to secure responsible government, Mr. Coles was the leading spirit. His opponents were men of position, of talent, and of education, who had been until then all-powerful in the colony. He had to contend with strong social prejudices, which were even more difficult to overcome than his political adversaries; and he was under the necessity of organizing a party out of materials by no means the most promising. Without detracting from the merit of his coadjutors, he, to a greater degree than any of them, possessed the rare combination of qualities necessary to rouse a submissive people to resistance, and to infuse spirit and confidence into men who had been discouraged by a long series of defeats. When in power he introduced the franchise law, the land purchase act, and other beneficial measures with which his name is destined to continue identified.
In 1867, a melancholy change was observed in the veteran statesman. His vigorous mind, it was but too apparent, was giving way. In 1866 there had been a great fire in Charlottetown, and owners of property were kept in a state of anxiety by the suspicion that a band of incendiaries were at work in the city. The exertions made by Mr. Coles to save the property of his fellow-citizens, and the state of alarm in which he was kept, did irreparable injury to a constitution already undermined by arduous mental labor. His mental condition necessitated his retirement from public life in August, 1868. He died on the morning of the twenty-first of August, 1875. His funeral was attended by the Lieutenant-governor, Sir Robert Hodgson,—the pall being borne by the Honorable T. H. Haviland, the Honorable J. C. Pope, William Cundall, Esquire, the Honorable R. P. Haythorne, the Honorable Judge Young, and the Honorable Benjamin Davies. His body lies in the graveyard of Saint Peter’s Church.
James Douglas Haszard was born in Charlottetown in the year 1797. He was one of the descendants of a spirited loyalist, who proved his attachment to the monarchical form of government by refusing to take his property, which had been confiscated, on the condition that he should become an American. In the year 1823 Mr. Haszard began business by publishing the Register, and successively the Royal Gazette, and Haszard’s Gazette, until the year 1858. Previous to the publication of the Register, a total issue of fifty papers sufficed for the colony. Mr. Haszard was ever ready to do good work in connection with industrial and benevolent societies. He was the first to start a cloth-dressing mill in the colony; and, as secretary and treasurer of the Royal Agricultural Society, he introduced improvements in farming implements and machinery. During the famine of 1837 he relieved many destitute families. He died in August, 1875, highly esteemed and deeply regretted.
CHAPTER XII.
Commercial Statistics—Imports—Exports—Revenue—Government Policy—Fisheries—Education—Manufactures—Charlottetown—Census of 1798.
We shall now present a few facts respecting the commerce and other prominent interests of the island. Through the courtesy of the efficient collector of customs,—Mr. Donald Currie,—a gentleman whose polite attention and hospitality to strangers visiting the island deserve a permanent record,—we have been favored with important returns. As an illustration of the wonderful progress made in the development of the agricultural resources of the island, we may state that while the quantity of oats exported in 1862 was only 943,109 bushels, it amounted, in 1872, to 1,558,322 bushels!
The following is the value in dollars of the imports and exports of the island from 1870 to 1874, inclusive. The returns represent a rate of progress to which, perhaps, no parallel can be produced in the British Empire: [J]
| YEAR. | IMPORTS. | EXPORTS. |
| 1870 | $1,928,662 | $2,154,003 |
| 1871 | 2,336,800 | 1,625,635 |
| 1872 | 2,569,878 | 1,894,173 |
| 1873-4 | 1,908,522 | 1,908,461 |
| 1874-5 | 1,960,997 | 1,940,901 |
The island revenue was formerly derived from ad valorem and specific import duties, land assessments, sales of public and Crown lands. Since confederation it comes from compensatory subsidies, and the two last named sources. The revenue of 1860, in sterling currency, was £28,742, and the expenditure £41,196; in 1865 the revenue was £45,360, and the expenditure £48,350; in 1870 the revenue was £62,230, and the expenditure £70,662,—thus the revenue has been increasing from 1860 to 1870 at the average rate of £3,400. The receipts for the year 1874 were $403,013, and the expenditure for the same year was $435,207. The reason why in this latter year the expenditure exceeds the revenue is to be found in the fact of the large amount paid as compensation for land appropriated for railway purposes. It is right, also, the statement should go forth that the expenditure, which was so much in excess of the revenue in previous years, has been owing to the judicious purchase, by successive governments of the island, of freehold estates. Indeed, from 1854 to 1870 the government bought 445,131 acres of land, at a cost, in sterling money, of £98,435, of which 345,475 acres have been resold up to the year 1870. The money thus expended in the purchase of land is now in process of indirectly yielding a profitable return to the island; so that for contracting temporary debt, successive governments deserve credit instead of condemnation. They have made bold and successful efforts to shield the people from the misery and ruin entailed by the reckless disposal of the land by the Crown, and from the gross injustice of successive home governments in not making full and honorable compensation for the evil consequences of their action.
Mr. John Ings has placed at the temporary disposal of the writer a most interesting little manuscript book containing extracts from the survey of Captain Holland, in 1765, and exhibiting penmanship and neatness of arrangement of the first order. At this period the number of acres cleared in the three counties was 11,235; houses, 391; churches, 2; mills, 11.
The number of acres of arable land held by all families in 1861 was 368,127. The number held in 1871 was 445,103,—the increase in ten years being 76,976 acres!
Prince Edward Island is the best fishing-station within the Gulf of Saint Lawrence. But this important department of industry has not been cultivated to anything like the extent it ought,—being mainly carried on with United States capital. The following table from the census of 1870 shows that there had been, from 1860 until 1870, little, if any, progress:—
| 1860. | 1870. | |
| Fishing Establishments, | 89 | 176 |
| Barrels of Mackerel cured, | 7,163 | 16,047 |
| Barrels of Herrings or Alewives, | 22,416 | 16,831 |
| Quintals of Codfish or Hake, | 39,776 | 15,649 |
| Gallons of Fish Oil, | 17,609 | 11,662 |
| Boats owned for fishing, | 1,239 | 1,183 |
| Men engaged in fishing, | 2,318 | 1,646 |
In 1870 the total number of schools in the three counties was 372; and of scholars, 15,000. In 1874 the number of schools was 403; of scholars, 18,233. The salaries of teachers range from $113.56 to $324.44,—only about twenty teachers receiving the larger sum,—an allowance which cannot, by any possibility, command the necessary talent, and which must be increased if the educational system is to be put on a proper basis.
The manufactures of the island are such as promise further development. The importance of diminishing the import of articles which can be produced cheaply on the island as elsewhere cannot be overestimated. Merchants who send money from the island to procure manufactured goods which they can obtain to equal advantage at home are enemies to the material progress of the island. Is furniture required? Men like Messrs. John Newson, Mark Butcher, or John E. Ferguson can supply it. Are carriages or wagons needed? Visit Messrs. McKinnon & Fraser’s establishment, or that of Messrs. J. & R. Scott. Are castings needed? Messrs. McKinnon & McLean, or Mr. Edward Morrisey can accommodate customers. Are window-sashes or similar woodwork in request? Lee & Gale are prepared to execute orders. Is tobacco required? Messrs. Hickey & Stewart and Charles Quirk produce a superior article. Are mowing-machines needed by our farmers? Mr. Archibald White makes them in great numbers and of excellent design and quality. Is well-made cloth required? It can be supplied in abundance by the manufacturing establishment of Mr. John D. Reid, Tryon. The men of whom these and similar firms consist are practical tradesmen, who are not ashamed to earn their bread by the sweat of their brow, and who naturally look to their fellow-islanders for that support to which their skill and enterprise entitle them.
The railway, under the management of Mr. McKechnie, prospers beyond the most sanguine expectations of its promoters. It was opened in the month of April, 1875. We give a statement of traffic earnings from the date of its opening till the close of August, 1875:—
| No. Passengers. | Amount. | Freight. | Mails. | Express. | Total. |
| 47,847 | $35,655 | $14,381 | $1,737 | $1,391 | $53,164 |
Mr. Stronach manages the mechanical department efficiently, and the amount paid annually in wages is such as confers signal benefit on Charlottetown.
One word about Charlottetown. If the city were to represent the intelligence and enterprise of the fair and fertile isle of which it is the capital, it would be celebrated in the Dominion for the excellence of its sidewalks, its copious supply of water, its thorough system of drainage, and the delightful salubrity of its atmosphere. Since our arrival on the island, our head has been more than once in danger of coming into violent contact with the dilapidated wooden structure beneath. “I smell you in the dark,” said Johnson to Boswell, as they walked on one of the then unwatered and undrained streets of Edinburgh, and certainly, the redolence of Charlottetown can hardly with truth be said to be elysian. The return of Mr. William Murphy, the representative of pure water, to a civic seat, from which he ought never to have been ejected, augurs that the legislative and municipal steps already taken to furnish a remedy for evils which can no longer exist without injury to the health of the inhabitants, will lead to a speedy consummation devoutly to be wished; and then Charlottetown will stand, in the estimation of tourists, in the position which its natural advantages warrant.
In hotel accommodation, the extensive and well-equipped Island Park Hotel of Mr. Holman, which we visited, is a credit to the island. The hotel of Mr. John Newson, at Rustico, is also well reported; and we are given to understand that Miss Rankin, determined that Charlottetown should no longer lag behind the times, is about to have a handsome house erected in a most suitable locality. A few first-class hotels will not only be mutually profitable to the owners, but also beneficial to respectable houses of all grades.
A Return of the Inhabitants on the Island of Saint John, taken in April, 1798, by order of His Excellency Governor Fanning, &c., &c., &c.: By Robert Fox, Deputy Surveyor. [K]
| No. of Lots or Townships | Names of the Heads of Families | Males | Females | Total Males and Females | ||||
| Under 16 yrs | From 16 to 60 | Above 60 | Under 16 yrs | From 16 to 60 | Above 60 | |||
| Lot No. 34. | Rev. Theo. DesBrisay | 5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 12 | ||
| Neil & Mal. Shaw | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John Auld | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Sandy Marshall | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Peter Leech | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |||
| John McGreggor | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Robt. Auld | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 | ||
| Lan. Brown | 1 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 12 | |||
| John Millar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Rod. Steele | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Corn. Higgans | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | |||
| James Curtis | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||||
| Wm. Lawson | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | ||
| Dun. Shaw | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Ronald McDonald | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Arch. McDonald | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Stephen Bovyer | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |||
| John McDonald | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John Brown | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Dan. Roper | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Col. Jo. Robinson | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |||
| John McCormack | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Caleb Sentner | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |||
| Mr. McCaustin | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Geo. Vickerson | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Old McCormick | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Peter Mattox | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Lot No. 33. | Neil McPhee | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Allan McDonald | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Angus McLeur | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Don. McKinnin | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Dun. McCullum | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |||
| James Griggor | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Peter Greggor | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | |
| Hugh Campbell | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Don. McFarlane | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | ||
| Sam. Hyde | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Robt. Urquhart | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| John McCullum | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Lot No. 24. | Peter Gallong | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | ||
| Matin Ryan | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 | ||||
| Jos. Gallong | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Peter Martin | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Sapplion Gallong | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Widow Shasong | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Jo. Peters | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Widow Martin | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Cha. Martin | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Mich. Doucette | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| James Peters | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Fran. Blanchard | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||
| Cha. Gallong | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Bonang Martin | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| John Blanchard | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | ||||
| Widow Guthroe | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||||
| Fabian Gallong | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Fran. Brown | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Alex. Dourong | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Widow Mewes | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 | |||
| John Ducett | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Fran. Ducett | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Brazil Gallong | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Cha. Gallong | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |||
| John Gallong | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Leman Gallong | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| John Durong | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Jos. Durong | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Fran. Botlea | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Peter Gooday | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John Peter, Jr. | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Lewi Gallong | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||
| Joe. Martin | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Charles Golly | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Feoman Martin | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 8 | |||
| John Peter, Senr. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Joe. Penean | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Peter Leclair | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Lewi Blakair | 6 | 1 | 1 | 8 | ||||
| Peter Peter | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Widow Gallong | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||
| John Gootia | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| James Adams | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Lot No. 23. | Capt. Wm. Winter | 4 | 3 | 7 | ||||
| John Grant | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Jacob Buskirk | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |||
| John McNeal | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | |||
| Wm. Simpson, Senr. | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Wm. Simpson, Jr. | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Wm. Clark | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Lot No. 22. | Tho. Adams | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Lot No. 21. | Robt. Anderson | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | ||
| David Cole | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Alex. Anderson | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Widow Anderson | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Wm. Pickering | 6 | 1 | 1 | 8 | ||||
| John Adams, Jr. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| John Adams, Senr. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| James Murphy | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Wm. Vincent | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||||
| Saml. Barnett | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Richard Moorfield | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Richard Shepherd | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Michael Murphy | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| James Campbell | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 10 | |||
| Barthw. Brislar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| James Townshend | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Lot No. 20. | Wm. Marks | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John Barefoot | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| John Crowley | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| James Dunn | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Daniel Delaney | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |||
| John Cousins | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Robert Heathfield | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Ben. Warren | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |||
| James Brander | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John Poor | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Geo. Warren | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Mrs. Rieley | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Lot No. 18. | Archibald McCoy | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | ||
| John Lawler | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| John Murchland | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Widow Green | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Peter Heron | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 12 | |||
| James McNutt, Esq. | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Dennis Rafter | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Patrick Sennott | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Ronald Morrison | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Peter McDougald | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 12 | |||
| Dougald Stewart | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Wm. Donald | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| James Woodside, Jr. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Arthur Owens | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Hugh McKendrick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Neal Ramsay | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | |||
| John Sinclair | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Donald McDougald | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Baldy Mathews | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | ||||
| Donald Taylor, Jr. | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Chas. McNeal | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Malcom Ramsay | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Alex. Boyce | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Alex. McCoy | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Angus Stewart | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Andrew Gray | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Angus McLelan | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||||
| John McLelan | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | |||
| Angus Gillis | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Royalty of Princetown | James Mountain | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| David Palmer | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Tho. Cochran, Senr. | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | |||
| John Whealan | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Tho. Sutton | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | ||||
| Benj. Warren, Senr. | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |||
| John Henry | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| John Thompson | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Tho. Cochran, Jr. | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| James Ferguson | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Jane Allen | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |||
| Kenith McKenzie | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Widow McNeal | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | ||||
| Geo. Thompson | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |||
| Widow McCoy | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | ||||
| Don. Taylor, Senr. | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John Mathews | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | |||
| John McKenzie | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | ||||
| Mal. McKendrick | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Chas. Stewart, Esq. | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 14 | |||
| John McGougan | 2 | 4 | 2 | 8 | ||||
| James Woodside, Senr. | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 10 | |||
| Hugh Montgomery | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | ||
| James Stewart | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Wm. Craig | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Danl. Montgomery, Esq | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Arch. Ramsay | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Wm. Baker | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| John Ramsay | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Edward Ramsay | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Joseph McLean | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |||
| Tho. Simpson | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Mal. McNeal | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| John McPherson | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| Don. McKenzie | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
| Alex. McKenzie | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
| John McMullan | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John McNeal | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Penney McDonald | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Lot No. 19. | Dav. Downing | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||
| Dugald Steele | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Wm. Holmes | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| James Nowlan | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Doodia Russel | 3 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | |||
| John Gallong, Senr. | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |||
| John Gallong, Jr. | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||
| John Perrie | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7 | ||||
| Joe Gooday, Senr. | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
| Bazil Perrie | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 13 | |||
| Jos. Deroche | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | ||||
| Fearman Arsnoe | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Prosper Perrie | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | ||
| Bedeque Bay. | George Mabey | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 9 | ||
| John Leforgee | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | |||
| James Warf | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Jonathan Palmer | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Lot No. 17. | Lewi Arsnoe | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Cyprian Arsnoe | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11 | |||
| Chas. Ducett | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Joe Gooday | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Yaco Shasong | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Peter Arsnoe | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Widow Gallong | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Chas. Rushaw | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |||
| Cyprian Gallong | 6 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 14 | |||
| Minie Gallong | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | ||||
| Larriong Bernard | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Joe Bernard | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | ||
| Placid Arsnoe | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Paul Arsnoe | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
| Alex. Arsnoe | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||
| Joseph Rushaw | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Peter Perrie | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Joseph Arsnoe | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |||
| John Arsnoe | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |||
| Joe Arsnoe | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |||
| Fearman Gallong | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Widow Ducett | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| John B. Gallong | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 12 | |||
| Stephen Arsnoe | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Joe Ducett | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Stephen Gooday | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Peter Bourke | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John Babtist St. John | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Benjamin Darby | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |||
| Daniel Green | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 12 | |||
| Lot No. 16. | Babtist Arsnoe | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||
| Mal. Ramsay, Esq. | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Fran. Gallong | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Owen Hickey | 3 | 3 | ||||||
| John Shassong | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 11 | |||
| Peter Perrie | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Gregwar Bernard | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Antonie Gallong | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Lewi Arsnoe | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Peter Bernard | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |||
| John Arsnoe | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Bazile Perrie | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 | |||
| John Wedge | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 11 | |||
| Francis Gallong | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Widow Arsnoe | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Alex. Cameron | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |||
| Donald Campbell | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |||
| Hugh McCarter | 2 | 5 | 2 | 9 | ||||
| Angus McGinnis | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Widow McDonald | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Don. Forbes | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Archibald Cameron | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Allan McLean | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| John McDonald | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Lot No. 14. | Donald McDonald | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||
| Angus McKinnion | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John McLelan | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John Gillis | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Laughlin McIntyre | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||||
| Alex. McCarter | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Murdock Campbell | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Donald Gillis | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Tho. English | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Patrick Rochfort | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Michael McIntosh | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | ||||
| Lot No. 13. | George Blood | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | ||
| Rodk. Gillis | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Widow Ramsay | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 9 | |||
| George Penman | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |||
| Dougald Campbell | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Donald Murphy | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Wm. Hunter | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| John Ramsay | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Lot No. 11. | George Linklater | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| James Smith | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |||
| Lot No. 6. | George Hardey | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 11 | ||
| Lot No. 5. | John Murray | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| John Brownyoung | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Jacob Vigo | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Hugh Ross | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| Alexander McKinnion | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Tho. Duffee | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Michael McNamara | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Lot No. 25. | Angus McDonald | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | ||
| Ronald McDonald | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Samuel Rix | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| William Wright | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | ||
| Jessie Strang | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John Murray | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | ||
| David Murray | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |||
| Lot No. 26. | William Schurman | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 12 | ||
| Peter Schurman | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| Samuel Chatterton | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |||
| John Baker | 4 | 3 | 3 | 10 | ||||
| Major Hooper | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Joseph Selliker | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Thomas Hooper, Esq. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| William Barrett | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Peter Mabee | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | |||
| John Strickland | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Nathaniel Wetherall | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| Widow Robins | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | ||||
| Benjamin Cole | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Richard Price | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Moses Hives | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Alexander Anderson | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Archibald McCullum | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Lot No. 27. | Daniel Woods | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | ||
| John McDonald | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Dennis Flyn | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| John McGinnis | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Dougald McGinnis | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Donald McKenzie | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | ||||
| Lot No. 28. | Peter Rubere | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | ||
| William Clark | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||
| George Molart | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||
| John Gould | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| George Stagman | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Tho. Gamble | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Dav. McWilliam | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Widow Pollard | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 | ||||
| Adam Fullmon | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Widow Lard | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| James Hewit | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Lot No. 28. | Morris Quinlan | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||
| John Taylor | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Joseph Woods | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Dav. Penman | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| William Warren | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |||
| John Lord | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | |||
| Nathaniel Wright | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | ||||
| John Foy, Esq. | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Philip Callbeck | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Ebenezer Ward | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Peter Clymer | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |||
| Paul Clymer | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Lot No. 30. | James McDougald | 1 | 6 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Jno. McDonald | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |
| Lot No. 31. | Johnson Basto | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 12 | ||
| Michael Seeley | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Wm. Wilson | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Benjamin Nicholson | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||
| Lieut. John McDonald | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |||
| Thomas Hyde | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | |||
| Lot No. 32. | John Wilson | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | ||
| Wm. Crosby | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | ||
| Wm. Hyde | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |||
| Jno. Creamer | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Wm. Dockendorff | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Wm. Long | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Donald McNab | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Jacob Hartze | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | ||||
| Jer. Myers | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Conrod Yonker | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Wm. Fisher | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Lot No. 65. | Rob. McConnel | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Angus McGinnis | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Robert Fox | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Peter McMahon | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Ben Wood | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| John Clark | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 15 | |||
| Lot No. 49. | John McGinnis | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | ||
| Wm. Hassard | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | ||
| Wm. Jetson | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Barney McCrossen | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| John Burho | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 11 | |||
| Wm. Wood, jr. | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Wm. Wood, senr. | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 | |||
| Joseph Smith | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |||
| John Costin | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John Eacharn | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Nicks. Jenkins | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 11 | |||
| George Hayden | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| James L. Hayden | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Lot No. 50. | —— Rynolds | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| Joseph Beers, Esq. | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Frederick Praught | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Richard Myers | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Tho. Pendergast | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| James Carver | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Peter Musick | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Spencer Crane | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Don. McPhee | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |||
| John Praught | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| John McDonald | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Wm. Young | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 11 | |||
| James Lard | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Wm. Laws | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| John Van Niderstine | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John Haley | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Geo. Coughlin | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Wm. Morris | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| John Monlin | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Fred. Shultze | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Lot No. 64. | Nickl. Hughes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||
| Wm. Shenshabach | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Mrs. Forster | 4 | 1 | 5 | |||||
| Lot No. 63. | Wm. Graham | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Lot No. 61. | John Griffin | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Lot No. 59. | William Creed | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Dav. Young | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Jos. Clark | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Dav. Ervin, Esquire | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Wm. Ervin | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Jno. Aitkin | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Wm. Keoughan | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Lot No. 54. | Duncan McSwain | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Farquhar Campbell | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Angus Steele | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Dun. Campbell | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Alex. McLelan | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Lot No. 55. | John McLean | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |||
| Alex. McLean | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John McLean | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Lot No. 56. | Don. McCormick | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | ||
| Angus McCormick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Rod. McDonald | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Don. McDonald | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Angus Walker | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Hugh Morris | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |||
| John Carpenter | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Wm. Blackett | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Wm. Hayne | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Joseph Brown | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Wm. Dingwell | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Boughton Island. | Hugh McCormick | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | ||
| Alex. Steele | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Lot No. 50. | Dan. Shiverie | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Peter Shiverie | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Lot No. 43. | Lewi Longapee | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Lewi Longapee, senr. | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| John Longapee | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Brazile Shasong | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Lemong Shasong | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John Shasong | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Paul Shasong | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Rusile Shasong | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Babtist Launderie | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Paul Peter | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Naurie Mashell | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| German Shasong | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | |||
| Joe Peters, senr. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Joe Peters, jr. | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Simon Burk | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John Burk | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Ambrose Burk | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Lavia Peter | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |||
| Peter Shiverie | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Joseph Burk, senr. | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | |||
| Joseph Burk, jr. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Simon Burk | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| James Aitkin | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Robert Dingwell | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| John Hipwell | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| John McPhee | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Dond. McPhee | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Neal McPhee | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Dond. McCormick | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Mary Sutherland | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Rod. McDonald | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Laughlin McDonald | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 | ||||
| Dond. McDonald | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Allen McDonald | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Hector McDonald | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Rod. McDougald | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Rod. McIntosh | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Don. McDonald | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |||
| John McDonald | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Angus McDonald | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | ||
| Angus McFarrish | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Allan McDonald | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Lot No. 40. | John McKenzie | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | ||
| John Duke | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | |||
| Cha. Saunders | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | ||||
| Wm. Webster | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Saml. Hutchinson | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Lot No. 39. | Alex. Dingwell | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
| James Dingwell | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Arch. McKenzie | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | ||
| Jacob Taylor | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John Dingwell | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Tho. Wright, Surv. Gen. | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 12 | |||
| Dond. Peyton | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 11 | |||
| John Moore | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Tho. Webster | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John McKie | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| James McIntire | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Don. McIntire | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Dav. Anderson, senr. | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | ||||
| Dav. Anderson, jr. | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| James Anderson | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Wm. McKie, Esquire | 3 | 4 | 1 | 8 | ||||
| Robert Banks | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Angus McIntire | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Rond. McDonald | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John McDonald | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John McEachran | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |||
| Widow Fisher | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | ||||
| Rod. McDonald | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Angus McFarrish | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Hugh McFarrish | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Joseph Dingwell | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Angus McDonald | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | ||
| Duncan McEwin | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 12 | |||
| Wm. Robins | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Allen McDonald | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Allen McDonald | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | ||
| Allen McKisick | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Laughlin McDonald | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Uriah Coffin | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | ||
| Fred Simonds | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||
| John Ford & Peebles | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| John Broh | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| John Murrough | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||||
| Edwd. Allen | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | ||
| John Campbell | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Peter Rose | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Angus McDonald | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Angus Campbell | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 12 | |||
| Lot No. 42. | John McKinnion | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | ||
| Rod. McKinnion | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |||
| John McDonald | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| (Little) John McKinnion | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Hector McKinnion | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Lot No. 41. | Angus McKisick | 7 | 1 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Neil McCormick | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| John McKinnion | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| John McDonald | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Angus McIntire | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Lot No. 38. | Don. McAdam | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Alex. McAdam | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | ||
| Laughlin McAdam | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Allen McDougald | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |||
| John McEachran | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Widow McEachran | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | ||||
| Hugh McEachran | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |||
| Hugh McEachran, senr. | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |||
| Revd. Angus McEachran | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Angus McDonald | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Arch. McPhee | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| John McPhee | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Rod. McDonald | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Allen McIntire | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Don. McIntire | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | |||
| John McEachran | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Dun. McMullen | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Allen Morrison | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Ellisha Coffin | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Widow Coffin | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||
| Kemble Coffin | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |||
| Benj. Coffin | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Dond. McMullen | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John McMullen | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Alex. McMullen | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Joseph Smallwood | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | ||
| Neal McDonald | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Angus Curry | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Call Curry | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Wm. Douglas | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 12 | |||
| James Hewick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| John Anderson | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Angus McPhee | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | ||
| Angus McPhee | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Angus McDonald | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||
| John McDonald | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |||
| Lot No. 37. | Cha. McKinnion | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John McCaskill | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Dond. McCaskill | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Duncan McGinnis | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Gallen McGinnis | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John McMullen | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | ||||
| Widow McGinnis | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |||
| John McDonald | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Angus McCormick | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Alex. McCloud | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Capt. John Stewart | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Alex. McKinnion | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Allen McKinnion | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Rond. McDonald | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |||
| Angus McDonald | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Murd. McCoy | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| John McDonald | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Allen McDonald | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| John McDonald | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Alex. McDonald | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 10 | |||
| Dond. McDonald | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 11 | |||
| Archd. McDonald | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | |||
| Duncan Gillis | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Alex. McDonald | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Dond. Grant | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| John McKinnion | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Wm. Gillis | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Angus McEachran | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | ||
| Dond. McEachran | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Widow McKinnion | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |||
| Hugh Gillis | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 | |||
| Widow Frazer | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Laurence Barrett | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| James Flanigan | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| John McCormick | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |||
| Hugh McNab | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Archd. McPhee | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Hugh McPhee | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Archd. Campbell | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Walter Walsh | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||
| Wm. Campbell | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Saml. Street | 3 | 3 | ||||||
| Rond. McDonald | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |||
| Lot No. 36. | Alexr. Curry | 4 | 3 | 7 | ||||
| Angus McKenzie | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Colin McKenzie | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | ||||
| Donald McIlray | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Donald McGraw | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | ||
| Angus McDonald | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | ||||
| Chas. McDonald | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 14 | |||
| Widow McDonald | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| John McIlray | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Martin McIlray | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 10 | |||
| Dond. Gillis | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | ||
| Dun. Gillis | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| James McDonald | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| John McDonald | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| John Stewart | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 10 | |||
| Dond. Morrison | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Hugh Walker | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Rond. McLean | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| John McKenzie | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Widow McDonald | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Capt. John McDonald | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |||
| John McPhee | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Alex. McIntosh | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Lot No. 35. | John McIntyre | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John Pringle | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||
| James Chaytor | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Dond. McIntosh | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Moses Keho | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Rod. McIsaac | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | ||||
| John McIntosh | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
| Edward Elvert | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Edwd. McAdam | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Dond. McIlray | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Patk. Curry | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John McIntire | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Dond. McKisick | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Dond. McDonald | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | ||||
| Angus McIlray | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Don. McEachran | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | ||
| Don. McDonald | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Don. McDonald | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | ||||
| John McDonald | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| James Lawson | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Rond. McDonald | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Don. Campbell | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John Campbell | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Hugh Campbell | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Lot No. 48. | Alex. McDonald | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||
| Neal McDonald | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Murd. McCloud | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |||
| Wm. Ferguson | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Dond. Curry | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Alex. Mutch | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |||
| John Bovyer | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Chief-justice Stewart | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | |||
| Angus Curry | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Angus McDonald | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | ||||
| Rodk. McDonald | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Benj. Crossman | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Royalty of Ch’town. | Patk. Oneal | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | ||
| J. Gellespie | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | ||||
| Ben. Grosvenor | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Rond. McDonald | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John Carrol | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Mrs. Hillman | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | ||||
| Dav. Ross | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Mrs. Cambridge | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |||
| John Brecken | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |||
| Colo. Lyons | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 13 | ||
| Widow Smith | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Benj. Chappell | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| David Laughry | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Henry W. Perry | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |||
| Rob. Hodgson, Esqr. | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | ||||
| Serjt. Deering | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| John J. Potcher | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| John Hall | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Rob. Callehan | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| John Webster, senr. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| John Coxen | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Wm. Townshend. Esqr. | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |||
| John Revel | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Robert Jeffrys | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Doctor Patton | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Tho. Alexander | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Peter Connoly | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |||
| John Condon | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Alex. Rea | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | ||||
| Saml. Bagnal | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Alex. A. Rind | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John McKinnion | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |||
| Dond. McPhee | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
| Joseph Robinson | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Alex. Richardson | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | ||||
| Widow Clark | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||
| Ser. McCloud | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| —— Ross, Esq | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| John Hawkins | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |||
| His Ex. Gov. Fanning | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 18 | |||
| Robert Lee | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Thos. R. Hassard | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John Webster, jr. | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Peter McGowan | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Doctor Nicholson | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| James Douglas, Esquire | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |||
| John Jones | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John Wright | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Angus McEachran | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John Lewis | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | ||||
| Lieut. A. Smyth | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| Angus McPhee | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Tho. Geary | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Andrew Ladner | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Geo. Hopps | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Nath McDonnell | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Dond. McDonald | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| Lieut. Cha. Stewart | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 12 | |||
| Nichs. Counahan | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Jos. Aplin, Esqr. | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Fran. Longworth | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Robt. Kiley | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Saml. Braddock | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
| John Gardner | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Doctor Gordon | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Colo. Desbrisay | 2 | 1 | 3 | |||||
| Colo. Gray | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | ||||
| Wm. Burk | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 10 | |||
| Dond. Kennedy | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||
| Rob. Emmerson | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |||
| John Jerome | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Willm. Amos | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Martin Dwyre | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Peter Stafford | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| James Connoly | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |||
| Thos. Murray | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| James Ferguson | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Saml. Byers | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||