“If I were duke of this land I would rather have that song than a hundred florins, for there is no curse over us and over your land, but a benediction and heavenly dew, but over these nuns is a stern rebuke and the sign of their reformation. But we are few, being but our four selves, and the nuns are many. If they were to attack us with their distaffs and with stones hidden in their long sleeves, what should we do? Let us call in others to help.” Then the duke, going up alone to them said, “May what you sing be upon you and your bodies”; and to his servants who were standing with the nuns in the choir, he said, “come hither to us.”

The nuns followed the Duke and the servants, thinking that their chests and money boxes were going to be broken up, whereupon the Duke rebuked them, saying that if they and their noble friends and the Bishop of Minden opposed reform any longer, he would turn them off his lands. The nuns then asked to be allowed to take counsel with their friends and relatives, to which the Duke, on Busch’s intercession, unwillingly agreed. The friends accordingly came to a conference, but all they did was to repeat the nuns’ request in the same form, and they continued to do so after the Duke had given them two or three chances to reconsider the matter; whereupon he sent them away, and they rode off, followed by their shield-bearers. The Duke then ordered the gates of the house to be opened to Busch, but the nuns returned a message that the keys were lost. The Duke, on Busch’s authority, sent for several rustics and villeins, who brought a long bench and broke open the door. The reformers went up into the choir and there found the nuns, flat on their faces with arms out like a cross, and round them a circle of little wooden and stone images of saints, with a burning candle between each. Seeing that it was useless to resist, they approached the visitors, and the Duke addressed them, saying that if they would receive reform, he would keep them on his land, and if not carriages were ready to take them away for ever. The nuns begged him to “remove those monks from their necks,” when they would do his will, but the Duke replied that he did everything by the advice of Rutger and Busch.

The nuns then gave way and the reform was begun, after which the Duke and his followers rode away, leaving his councillor and notary with Busch. But at nightfall the nuns sent their praepositus to Busch, with the message: “My ladies the prioress and nuns say that they are not willing to serve as they promised, but they wish to remain as they were and are.” The Duke had to be sent for once more and eventually all the nuns submitted except one, who seems to have fallen into a fit, and the reform went on apace:

“Because we instructed them kindly and not austerely,” says Busch, “they said to us, ‘At first we thought that you would be very austere and unkind, but now we see that you are gentle as the angels of heaven. Now we have more faith in you than in the lord duke.’”

Busch’s troubles, however, were not over, for twice within the next few days he was attacked by armed men objecting to the new enclosure of the nuns, and only his native wit and conciliatory words saved him from a very dangerous situation[2145].

Almost equally difficult was the reform of Mariensee, where again the Bishop of Minden did all in his power to oppose reform, having (according to Busch) been bribed by the nuns to defend them. The Duke of Brunswick, however, forced the nuns to admit the reformers and forced the Bishop to send four emissaries to assist in carrying out the reform. These four prelates entered the house first to ask the nuns if they would consent to receive reform; but they refused, and one young woman tore off her veil and crown and casting them at the feet of the Bishop’s suffragan cried: “Always hitherto you have told me that I need not be reformed and now you want to compel me to be reformed. Behold your crown and veil! I will no longer be a nun.” The Bishop’s emissaries after this gave up their half-hearted attempt to reform the house and retired, leaving the field to Busch and his companions. The Duke then caused four carriages to be brought to the door, in which the rebellious nuns could be taken away, whereat the Abbess and the nuns climbed up into the vaults of the church and hid themselves there. The Duke ordered his servants to fetch ladders and place them against the roof and then to climb up and fetch down the nuns, but the prudent Busch prevented this, saying that the nuns would push over and kill the first who went up the ladder. Instead he went into the choir and, finding one nun still walking there, threatened her that unless the whole convent came down from the roof at once, they should be taken away in the carriages, “to-night you shall be in the Duke’s castle of Nyerstadt, tomorrow in his castle of Calenberg, and after that outside his lands, perchance never to return.” Whereupon the horrified nuns descended.

Then followed an amusing scene. All the nuns agreed to accept the new reforms, except one young woman, who refused:

“Then,” says Busch, “I said to the lord Duke, ‘This sister scorns obedience and contradicts everything.’ Whereupon, finding how perverse she was, he seized her and tried to draw her to the carriage. But when he had thrown his arms about her, she fell back flat on the ground, the Duke on the top of her, and the other nuns on the top of the Duke, each pushing the other on to him, so that the Duke could not raise himself from off her, especially as his arms were crushed beneath her scapular. And we, who saw him lying thus, stood away, waiting for the end of the business. At length he got one arm away from her, and with it pushed off the nuns who were lying upon him, hitting them and drawing blood from their arms, for he was a man and the nuns were like children, without strength and resistance.”

(This was the age of chivalry!) When he had got rid of these nuns he lifted the nun on whom he was lying, pulled his other arm free and sprang to his feet again, saying to the vassals and servants, who were standing round: “Why do you allow your liege lord thus to be trampled under foot by nuns?” One of them replied for all, “Gracious lord! we have ever stood by thee where the war engines were hurling their stones and the bows their arrows; only tell us what we are to do and we will willingly do it.” Then said he, “Whichever nun I seize, do you seize her too,” and they replied. “Willingly, gracious lord.” Whereupon the nuns gave in and professed themselves willing to be reformed. But they were still recalcitrant at heart, and when Busch, Rutger and the Duke were going away, they all began to sing the antiphon “Media vita” at the top of their voices and pursued the hapless reformers through the church, pelting them with burning candles. One girl followed them outside to the cemetery, chanted “Sancte deus, sancte, fortis, sancte et immortalis” three times and falling on her knees, bit the ground thrice in sign of a curse, and threw stones and earth after them. In the end, however, even this stormy convent was reduced to peace and reform, after three reformed nuns from Derneburg were brought in to teach them[2146].

Busch had almost as much difficulty with the nuns of Derneburg, an Austin house near Hildesheim, in which, as he says: “the nuns had long lived an irregular life, owning private property, and, according to public rumour, incontinent,” paying long visits outside their house as often as they pleased and performing only the minimum routine of monastic life. On one occasion, Busch tells us,

When I was taking their private possessions away from the nuns and placing them in the common stock, it happened that I was going through their cupboards and cellars, for several of them had a small cellar encircling the monastery, which was entered by three or four steps and had covered vaults, in which they kept their beer and other private allowances. They were showing me the cellars, and going down into them before me, and the last nun said to me: “Do you go first now, father, for my cellar is the same as those of the other sisters,” and without thinking I did so. But when I went down into it, she suddenly clapped to the door or vault over my head and stood upon it. I was shut up alone in there, thinking what would have happened if the nuns had shut me up there secretly; and I shouted to my brother, who was standing outside with them, bidding him cause them to open the door and let me out. At length after some delay they opened the trap-door of the cellar and let me come out. After that I was never willing to go first into any closed place in any nunnery, lest anything of the kind should happen, and lest I should be unable to get out easily. But when two or three preceded me, then I followed them. One only going in front did not suffice me, lest they should shut me up for some time alone with her and then spread tales about me. The sister who did this was good enough and very simple, whence I was astonished that she should think of such a thing.

It was while he was reforming this house, too, that he was attacked by several armed laymen, who took the part of the nuns. The nuns of Derneburg were never effectually reformed, although Busch gave himself the greatest trouble over them. At the end of three years they prevailed upon their friends and relatives in the neighbourhood to get rid of Busch and his brethren, and the nuns received Henry, Abbot of Marienrode, as their spiritual father and reformer instead. But they did not gain by the change, for he, being a Cistercian, introduced a nun of his own order as their prioress, and finally the Bishop of Hildesheim, the Abbot of Marienrode and other reformers came one morning to the house and, rebuking the nuns for their imperviousness to reform, made them come away in all their old clothes, leaving their books and possessions behind them, placed them in carriages and distributed them among other houses, where many were forced to become Cistercians. The house itself was turned into a Cistercian priory. “Thus,” says Busch, not without some satisfaction, “they lost the holy father St Augustine with me!”[2147]

The methods employed by Busch to carry out a reform were to undertake the initial stages himself and if necessary to obtain a few nuns from a previously reformed house to live in the convent and bring it to right discipline. He always began by hearing the confessions of the nuns, which often caused considerable fluttering in the convent. At St George, near Halle, he found that the convent was subordinated to the monastery of Zinna, and received its confessor from that house, which Busch decided to alter, for the Abbot of Zinna was impeding his reforms. He therefore bade the Abbess send the sisters to confess to him, but she replied:

“The sisters dare not confess to you by reason of the apostolic mandate and the abbot of Zinna and our own confessor, who comes from him.”

Then Busch said:

“Because I have authority to do so, say to them: the confessor is sitting in the church, in front of the window, where you are wont to confess, so you may go there and confess.” Then the prioress or eldest of the sisters came to the window and confessed fully to me ... and when she had finished I said, “Sister, have you more to say?” Whereat she cried in alarm, “Are you the provost of the Neuwerk?” I answered, “Even so.” “Then have I confessed to the provost?” “Yea.” “What now shall I do and say?” I replied, “Be silent and tell no one that I have heard your confession, so that the others may come to confess, otherwise you will be the only one to have confessed to me.” She did so and receiving absolution left me, telling no one that she had confessed to me.

After that each nun who came received the same advice, until all had confessed[2148].

At Derneburg the nuns were afraid to come and confess for another reason. There was current in the taverns and dining halls of the whole country side a tale of the terrible penance imposed by Busch upon a brother of his monastery of Sülte, who took a larger draught of drink from the drinking cup than Busch thought seemly, whereupon he was said to have caused the unfortunate man to lie for three hours before the dining table in the frater, with his mouth stretched open by a large horse-bone; and when one of the brothers burst out laughing at the sight, Busch was said to have thrown the drinking cup in his face. The weeping nuns informed him between their sobs: “We are virgins and maids, we cannot do such a great penance for such a little fault.” Busch was obliged to assure them that the whole tale was a fabrication[2149]. At Escherde he had the same difficulty.

The frightened nuns were afraid to confess to me, because they had heard that I was wont to inflict very severe penances, which was not true, as I afterwards told them. Then their praepositus said to them: “The bishop’s mandate orders you to confess to him under pain of excommunication and if you refuse then you will be under an interdict. My good ladies, I counsel you to confess to him. I will place beside him my servant with a drawn sword and if he says one bad or harsh word to you it shall cleave his head.” When they saw and heard that they could not escape they consented to confess to me, but they sent before them first one bold nun in order to beard me. Seated in the confessional, she began, “Sir, what do you here?” I answered, “I lead you all to the kingdom of heaven.”... Half the nuns confessed to me that day. To the third of them I said, “Sister, am I as harsh as you said I was?” and she replied, “You are a man of gold, gentle and kind beyond all things.” In the evening, when we were supping I said to the praepositus: “What are your nuns saying about me? Am I as severe as they thought?” He replied, “When it was their turn to go to confession, the hair of their heads stood on end, but when they came away from you, they returned in great consolation.” The next day I finished the others before dinner, and towards the end I asked one of them. “Am I as hard and severe as you heard?” and she replied, “Now you are honey-tongued. But when you have got our consent and have tied a rope to our horns to drag us along, then you will say to us: You must and shall do all that I desire.” I answered her, “Beloved sister, fear not, for I shall always remain kind and benign towards you”[2150].

Besides confessing the nuns Busch and his fellow visitors went through the conventual routine with them, showing them how they ought to perform divine service, to behave in the frater and to hold chapters. The most efficacious means of reform employed, however, was to send for some reformed nuns from another convent, to dwell in the newly reformed house. Nuns of the order of Mary Magdalen in Hildesheim went to Heiningen, Stederburg, Frankenburg, and the White Ladies of Magdeburg. Fischbeck was reformed by nuns of the Windesheim order. Marienberg was reformed by nuns of Bronopia and in its turn sent reformers to Marienborn and Stendal, where nuns of Dorstadt had already made reforms, from which the original members soon fell away. Two nuns and a conversa were sent from Heiningen to the Holy Cross at Erfurt and the Abbess and four nuns of Derneburg went to Weinhausen[2151]. The newcomers were usually gladly lent and graciously received in their new homes; sometimes they remained and held office in the latter and sometimes they returned to their own houses, when the reform was firmly rooted. The tale of the reform of Marienberg is charming[2152]. Busch, with the consent of the chapter-general of the congregation of Windesheim, took from Bronopia two nuns, Ida and Tecla and a lay sister Aleidis, who for his sake and for the sake of the good work left their own country and their noble friends and relatives, and made a long and sometimes dangerous journey with Busch across Westphalia and Saxony to Helmstedt. Here they were joyfully received. Ida was made subprioress to introduce reforms and to order all the internal discipline of the house; Tecla, who was a learned lady, was made governess of the novices, teaching them to sing and to read Latin and “to write letters and missives in a masterly manner, in good Latin, as I have seen and examined with my eyes.” Aleidis was made mistress of the conversi.

For three years these nuns dwelt at Helmstedt, beloved of all and bringing the place to excellent order. Then Tecla fell ill. The Prioress sent for Busch:

and I came and found her sitting in the infirmary and ordered her to be bled and to receive suitable medicine. And when I had remained there for two or three days I decided to go away without taking them and I bade them farewell at eventide;

for Busch had decided that it was time for the sisters to return to Bronopia:

After this the proctress of the house came to me, saying: “Beloved father! Sister Tecla is asking for you with tears, for she says she will never see you again. I beseech you that you will go and speak to her once again tomorrow, before you leave.” I answered, “Willingly, for she is my dear sister and for God’s sake and mine she left all her rich friends and her own country and followed me to this strange and distant land.” The next day, therefore, I visited her in her bed, in the presence of Ida and Aleidis. Then she was better and was well content that I should go away and soon she recovered altogether from that illness.

Shortly afterwards Busch took the three nuns with him and they set off to drive back to Bronopia, staying at various monastic houses on the way; and the nuns of Helmstedt all the time sent messengers after them, with letters assuring the three sisters of their love and sorrow. The journey was at length completed without any accident, except that fat sister Ida tumbled into a cellar at Wittenberg and hurt her leg, so that Busch had to carry her into the carriage.

To his account of this episode Busch subjoins four letters, one from himself, one from the prioress and stewardess of Helmstedt to the three sisters, one from the young scholars of the house to their mistress Tecla, and the reply of the three sisters to the convent and of Tecla to her scholars[2153]. In the Prioress’ letter there is a vivid description of the sorrow of the nuns at the departure of their three visitors:

Our sister Geseke Zeelde wept most tearfully and could not go into the workroom, so grieved she after sister Aleydis. Sister Mettike Guestyn was so miserable that she could not eat or drink. When I went into the kitchen sister Tryneke wept so much that all who were with her in the kitchen wept too and said: “O wi, now has our leader gone away!” When sister Elyzabeth Cyriaci began the office of the mass, she sang it so dolefully through her tears, that she could hardly sing. When she had to begin the ‘Benedictus’ after the ‘Sanctus’ she burst out crying, so that she could not sing at all, but sister Elyzabeth Broysen had to go on with it and she could hardly finish it. Geseke Obrecht and Heylewich the chantress are very sorrowful, because they did not say goodbye to you, for they did not know you were going so early. They now send you as many good wishes as there are sands in the sea. When the scholars come to school on Sunday, we cannot describe to you how many tears are shed there. The stewardess and I have to console the other sisters, but we are the rather in need of someone to console us. When we look on your places in choir and frater and dorter, then we grow sad and weep, saying, “O God, if only Bronopia were where Heiningen is, five miles away from us, then we might often visit each other, which now we cannot do, for we are forty miles away. We are as it were dead to each other at the two ends of the earth.” We have many other things to write to you, but because it is the middle of the night, we must separate and go to matins. Dearest sisters, we give you deepest thanks for all the good you have done for us, in spiritual and in temporal matters. God speed you a thousand times, in Jesus’ name.... As many as there are pearls, as many as there are planets in the heaven, as many as there are ends to the earth, so many godspeeds send we to you[2154].

The letter of the little novices to sister Tecla deserves quotation, to show their progress under her tuition:

Ihesum pium consolatorem merentium pro salute! Notum facimus charitati vestre, charissima soror Tecla magistra nostra, quod nos omnes scholares vestre in magna sumus tristitia et dolore de vestro a nobis recessu. Non enim possumus oblivisci presentiam vestram, sed cotidie querimus vos, et dum non invenimus, tunc contristamur et dolemus. Vix potestis credere, quanta tristitia et quantus dolor est in claustro nostro de vestra absentia tam de senioribus quam de iunioribus. Quapropter petimus cordintime, sicut amplius non sumus nos invicem visure in hac mortali vita, ut oretis pro nobis deum, ut taliter vivamus in hoc seculo, ut nos invicem videre valeamus in conspectu sancte Trinitatis. Valete, soror dilectissima, cum charissimis sororibus vestris Ida et Aleide in domino semper! Et deus omnipotens omnem tribulationem et angustiam a vobis removeat et vestram sanctitatem conservet tempora per eterna, Amen[2155].

It is a pretty picture of affection and concord, which is given by these letters, and may well be set against the pictures of conventual bickering, which are too often to be found in visitation reports.

Busch’s reforms seem to have been very successful. He often mentions that such and such a house remained in a good state of reform for such and such a number of years, or up to the day on which he wrote. Sometimes he describes reforming prioresses or other nuns, who did good work in their houses[2156]; sometimes also he mentions the assistance given by a wise confessor or custos. His only real failure seems to have been Derneburg; this house withstood both his efforts (for three years he had acted as confessor, walking two miles before breakfast to confess the nuns before communion) and those of the Cistercian abbot of Marienrode, who had been their benefactor for over 300 florins; and Busch quotes rather bitterly the proverb current in Germany:

Gratia nulla perit, nisi gratia sola sororum.
Sic fuit, est et erit: ‘ondanc’ in fine laborum[2157].

But he seldom got ondanc at the end of his work; and when his life drew to a close he could look back on hundreds of monks and nuns not only reformed by him, but also cherishing for him the greatest gratitude and affection. His was a large and humane spirit, and for all his zeal for reform and his reputation for sternness, it is plain that he had that greatest of gifts, the capacity to win the hearts of men.

 

 


APPENDIX IV

LIST OF ENGLISH NUNNERIES. c. 1275-1535

[In this list Ab. = Abbey, Pr. = Priory; A. = Austin, B. = Benedictine, C. = Cistercian, Cl. = Cluniac, Dom. = Dominican, Fr. = Franciscan, Brig. = Brigittine. P. = Premonstratensian. Gilbertine houses are not included.]

  House   Dedication   Order   County   Diocese   Founder and date
1. Aconbury   Holy Cross   A.Pr.   Her.   Her.   Margery, wife of Walter de Lacy, temp. John
2. Amesbury   St Mary and St
Meilor
  B.Pr.   Wilts.   Salis.   Saxon Abbey: refounded as a priory for nuns
of Fontevrault by King John, 1199
3. Ankerwyke   St Mary Magd.   B.Pr.   Bucks.   Linc.   Gilbert de Muntfichet, c. 1160
4. Arden   St Andrew   B.Pr.   York., N.R.   York   Peter de Hoton, temp. Henry II
5. Armathwaite   St Mary   B.Pr.   Cumb.   Carl.   Unknown, before 1200
6. Arthington   St Mary   Cl.Pr.   York., W.R.   York   Peter, son of Serlo de Arthington, middle of
twelfth century
7. Barking   St Mary and St
Ethelburga
  B.Ab.   Essex   Lon.   St Earconwald, Bishop of London, 675-93,
probably in 666
8. Barrow Gurney
(Minchin
Barrow)
  St Mary and St
Edward
  B.Pr.   Som.   B. and W.   Unknown: probably a Gurney, before 1212
9. Basedale   St Mary   C.Pr.   York., N.R.   York   Guy de Bovincurt, c. 1190 (see V.C.H. Yorks.
III, 158)
10. Blackborough   St Mary and St
Katherine
  B.Pr.   Norf.   Norw.   Roger de Scales and Muriel his wife, c. 1150
11. Blithbury   St Giles   B.Pr.   Staffs.   C.L.   Hugh Malveysin, after 1129
12. Brewood
(Black Ladies)
  St Mary   B.Pr.   Staffs.   C.L.   Unknown, twelfth century
13. Brewood
(White Ladies)
  St Leonard   C.Pr.   Salop   C.L.   Unknown, twelfth century
14. Bristol   St Mary Magd.   A.Pr.   Glouces.   Worc.   Eva, widow of Robert Fitzhardinge, c. 1173
15. Brodholme   St Mary   P.Pr.   Notts.   York   Agnes de Camville, wife of Peter de Gousla,
temp. Stephen
16. Bromhale   St Margaret   B.Pr.   Berks.   Salis.   Unknown, before 1200
17. Bruisyard   Ann. of St Mary   Fr.Ab.   Suff.   Norw.   Edward III, 1366, at instigation of Lionel,
Duke of Clarence
18. Buckland
(Minchin)
  St John Bapt.   A.Pr.
(nuns of St
John of
Jerusalem)
  Som.   B. and W.   Henry II, c. 1186 (instead of House of Austin
canons founded 1166 by William de Erlegh)
19. Bungay   St Mary and
Holy Cross
  B.Pr.   Suff.   Norw.   Roger de Glanville and Gundred his wife, c.
1160
20. Burnham   St Mary   A.Ab.   Bucks.   Linc.   Richard, King of the Romans, 1266
21. Cambridge   St Radegund   B.Pr.   Cambs.   Ely   c. 1133-8, temp. Nigel, Bishop of Ely
22. Campsey   St Mary   A.Pr.   Suff.   Norw.   Theobald de Valognes, c. 1195
23. Cannington   St Mary   B.Pr.   Som.   B. and W.   Robert de Courcy, c. 1138
24. Canonsleigh   St Mary, St John
Evangelist and
St Audrey
  A.Ab.   Devon   Ex.   Maud de Clare, Countess of Gloucester and
Hertford, temp. Edward I (previously a
house of canons)
25. Canterbury   St Sepulchre   B.Pr.   Kent   Cant.   St Anselm, 1100
26. Carrow   St Mary and St
John
  B.Pr.   Norf.   Norw.   King Stephen, 1146
27. Catesby   St Mary, St
Edmund and
St Thomas
the Martyr
  C.Pr.   Northants.   Linc.   Robert de Esseby, c. 1175
28. Chatteris   St Mary   B.Ab.   Cambs.   Ely   Eadnoth, Abbot of Ramsey, c. 1010
29. Cheshunt   St Mary   B.Pr.   Herts.   Lon.   Unknown, twelfth century
30. Chester   St Mary   B.Pr.   Chester   C.L.   Ranulf, Earl of Chester, c. 1140
31. Clementhorpe   St Clement   B.Pr.   York., W.R.   York.   Thurstan, Archbishop of York, c. 1130
32. Clerkenwell   Assumption
of St Mary
  B.Pr.   Midd.   Lon.   Jordan Brisett, c. 1100
33. Cokehill   ——   C.Pr.   Worc.   Worc.   Isabel, Countess of Warwick, end of twelfth
century
34. Cornworthy   St Mary   A.Pr.   Devon   Ex.   Uncertain, fourteenth century
35. Crabhouse   St Mary Magd.
St John Evang.
St Thomas
and St Peter
  A.Pr.   Norf.   Norw.   Roger, prior, and canons of Rainham, c. 1181
36. Dartford   St Mary and St
Margaret
  A.Pr.
(according
to rule and
in charge
of Dom.
friars)
  Kent   Roch.   Edward III, 1355
37. Davington   St Mary Magd.   B.Pr.   Kent   Cant.   Fulk de Newenham, 1153
38. Delapré
(de Pratis)
  St Mary   Cl.Ab.   Northants.   Linc.   Simon of Saint-Liz, Earl of Northampton,
temp. Stephen (first at Fotheringay)
39. Delapré
(de Prato)
  St Mary   B.Pr.   Herts.   Linc.   Under abbey of St Albans
40. Denny   St James and
St Leonard
  Fr.Ab.   Cambs.   Ely   Mary de Valence, Countess of Pembroke,
1342
41. Derby
(Kingsmead or
de Pratis)
  St Mary   B.Pr.   Derby   C.L.   Aubin, Abbot of Darley, c. 1160
42. Easebourne   Nativity of
B.V.M.
  B.Pr.   Suss.   Chich.   ... de Bohun, before 1248
43. Ellerton
(in Swaledale)
  St Mary   C.Pr.   York., N.R.   York   Uncertain, before 1227
44. Elstow   St Mary and
St Helen
  B.Ab.   Beds.   Linc.   Judith, Countess of Huntingdon, late
eleventh century
45. Esholt   St Mary, St
Leonard and
St James
  C.Pr.   York., W.R.   York   Uncertain, twelfth century
46. Fairwell   St Mary   B.Pr.   Staffs.   C.L.   Roger, Bishop of Coventry and Lichfield,
c. 1140
47. Flamstead   St Giles   B.Pr.   Herts.   Linc.   Roger de Tony, temp. Stephen
48. Flixton   St Mary and
St Katherine
  A.Pr.   Suff.   Norw.   Margery, widow of Geoffrey de Hanes and
daughter of Bartholomew de Crek, 1258
49. Fosse   St Nicholas   C.Pr.   Linc.   Linc.   The men of Torksey, before the reign of John
50. Godstow   St Mary and
St John Baptist
  B.Ab.   Oxon   Linc.   Edith, widow of Sir William Launcelene, c.
1133
51. Gokewell   St Mary   C.Pr.   Linc.   Linc.   William Dawtrey, before 1148 or 1185
52. Goring   St Mary   A.Pr.   Oxon   Linc.   Thomas de Druval, temp. Henry I
53. Gracedieu   Holy Trinity and
St Mary
  A.Pr.   Leices.   Linc.   Rohese de Verdon, c. 1239
54. Greenfield   St Mary   C.Pr.   Linc.   Linc.   Eudes of Grainsby and Ralph his son, before
1153
55. Grimsby   St Leonard   A.Pr.   Linc.   Linc.   Before 1184
56. Haliwell
(Shoreditch)
  St John Baptist   B.Pr.   Midd.   Lon.   Roger son of Gelren, before 1127
57. Hampole   St Mary   C.Pr.   York., W.R.   York   William de Clarefai and Avice de Tany his wife,
c. 1170
58. Handale
(or Grendale)
  St Mary   C.Pr.   York., N.R.   York   William Percy of Dunsley, 1133
59. Harrold   St Peter   A.Pr.   Beds.   Linc.   Sampson le Fort, before 1148 (as Arroasian
house). Nunnery, 1181
60. Hedingham,
Castle
  Holy Cross, St
Mary and
St James
  B.Pr.   Ess.   Lon.   Aubrey de Vere, Earl of Oxford, and Lucy his
wife, before 1191
61. Henwood   St Margaret   B.Pr.   Warw.   Worc.   Ketelbern de Langdon, between 1149 and
1161
62. Heynings   St Mary   C.Pr.   Linc.   Linc.   Reyner d’Evermue, temp. Stephen
63. Hinchinbrooke   St James   B.Pr.   Hunts.   Linc.   Removed from Eltisley, Cambs., temp. William I
64. Holystone   ——   B.Pr.   Northumb.   Dur.   ... Umfraville of Harbottle, before 1235
65. Ickleton   St Mary Magd.   B.Pr.   Cambs.   Ely   Uncertain, c. 1190
66. Ilchester
(White Hall)
  Holy Trinity   A.Pr.   Som.   B. and W.   William Dennis, c. 1220 (as a hospital). A
nunnery before 1281
67. Irford   St Mary   P.Pr.   Linc.   Linc.   Probably Ralph d’Albini, temp. Henry II
68. Ivinghoe   St Margaret   B.Pr.   Bucks.   Linc.   [William Giffard?], Bishop of Winchester,
twelfth century
69. Keldholme   St Mary   C.Pr.   York.,N.R.   York   Robert de Stuteville, temp. Henry I
70. Kilburn   St Mary and
St John Baptist
  B.Pr.   Midd.   Lon.   Herbert, Abbot of Westminster, 1139
71. Kington
St Michael
  St Mary   B.Pr.   Wilts.   Salis.   Before 1155
72. Kirklees   St Mary and St
James
  C.Pr.   York., W.R.   York   Reiner le Fleming, temp. Henry II
73. Lacock   St Mary and St
Bernard
  A.Ab.   Wilts.   Salis.   Ela, Countess of Salisbury, 1232
74. Lambley   St Patrick   B.Pr.   Northumb.   Durh.   Adam de Tynedale, temp. John
75. Langley   St Mary   B.Pr.   Leic.   Linc.   William Pantulf and Burga his wife, temp.
Henry II
76. Legbourne   St Mary   C.Pr.   Linc.   Linc.   Robert, son of Gilbert of Tathwell, after 1150
(removed from earlier site)
77. Lillechurch
(Higham)
  St Mary   B.Pr.   Kent   Roch.   King Stephen, before 1151
78. Littlemore   St Mary, St
Nicholas and
St Edmund
  B.Pr.   Oxon   Linc.   Robert de Sandford, temp. Stephen
79. London
(Bishopsgate)
  St Helen and
Holy Cross
  B.Pr.   Midd.   Lon.   William, son of William, the goldsmith, before
1216
80. London   St Mary and
St Francis
  Fr.Ab.   Midd.   Lon.   Edmund, Earl of Lancaster, 1293
81. Lymbrook   St Mary   A.Pr.   Her.   Her.   Uncertain
82. Lyminster   St Mary   B.Pr.   Suss.   Chich.   Roger de Montgomery, c. 1082 (as cell of
Almenèches)
83. Malling   St Mary and St
Andrew
  B.Ab.   Kent   Roch.   Gundulf, Bishop of Rochester, 1090
84. Marham   St Mary, St
Barbara and
St Edmund
  C.Ab.   Norf.   Norw.   Isabel, widow of Hugh de Albini, Earl of
Arundel, 1249
85. Markyate   Holy Trinity   B.Pr.   Beds.   Linc.   1145, under influence of Geoffrey, Abbot of
St Albans
86. Marlow,
Little
  St Mary   B.Pr.   Bucks.   Linc.   Uncertain, twelfth century
87. Marrick   St Andrew and
St Mary
  B.Pr.   York., N.R.   York   Roger de Aske, temp. Henry II
88. Moxby   St John
Evangelist
  A.Pr.   York., N.R.   York   Henry II, before 1167 (removed from double
house at Marton)
89. Neasham   St Mary   B.Pr.   Durh.   Durh.   Probably the Lord of Greystoke, before 1157
90. Newcastle-
upon-Tyne
  St Bartholomew   B.Pr.   Northumb.   Durh.   Uncertain, twelfth century
91. Nunappleton   St Mary and St
John Evangelist
  C.Pr.   York., W.R.   York   Eustace de Merch and Alice St Quintin his
wife, c. 1150
92. Nunburnholme   ——   B.Pr.   York., E.R.   York   Ancestors of Roger de Merlay, Lord of
Morpeth, twelfth century
93. Nuncoton   St Mary   C.Pr.   Linc.   Linc.   Alan de Mounceaux, before 1129
94. Nuneaton   St Mary   B.Pr.   Warw.   Worc.   Robert, Earl of Leicester, c. 1155, for nuns
of Fontevrault
95. Nunkeeling   St Mary and St
Helen
  B.Pr.   York., E.R.   York   Agnes de Arches, widow of Herbert St
Quintin, 1152
96. Nunmonkton   St Mary   B.Pr.   York., W.R.   York   William de Arches and Ivetta his wife, temp.
Stephen
97. Pinley   St Mary   C.Pr.   Warw.   Worc.   Robert de Pillarton, temp. Henry I
98. Polesworth   St Edith   B.Ab.   Warw.   C.L.   Saxon foundation. Refounded by Robert
Marmion, temp. Stephen
99. Polsloe   St Katherine   B.Pr.   Devon   Ex.   Traditional founder, William Bruere, before
1169
100. Redlingfield   St Andrew and
St Mary
  B.Pr.   Suff.   Norw.   Manasses, Count of Guisnes, and Emma de
Arras his wife, 1120
101. Romsey   St Mary and St
Elfrida
  B.Ab.   Hants.   Win.   Edward the Elder, c. 907: refounded by King
Edgar, 967
102. Rosedale   St Mary and St
Lawrence
  C.Pr.   York., N.R.   York   Robert, son of Nicholas de Stuteville, temp.
Richard I
103. Rothwell   St John Baptist   A.Pr.   Northants.   Linc.   ... de Clare, thirteenth century
104. Rowney   St John Baptist   B.Pr.   Herts.   Linc.   Conan, Duke of Britanny and Earl of Richmond,
temp. Henry II, suppressed 1459
105. Rusper   St Mary Magd.   B.Pr.   Suss.   Chich.   Twelfth century, probably by one of the Braose
family
106. St Stephen’s
(Foukeholme)
  St Stephen   B.Pr.   York, N.R.   York   Uncertain. Disappeared after 1349
107. Seton
(Lekeley)
  St Mary   B.Pr.   Cumb.   York   Henry son of Arthur son of Godard, Lord of
Millom, twelfth century
108. Sewardsley   St Mary Magd.   C.Pr.   Northants.   Linc.   Richard de Lestre, temp. Henry II
109. Shaftesbury   St Mary and St
Edward
  B.Ab.   Dorset   Salis.   King Alfred, c. 888
110. Sheppey
(Minster)
  St Mary and St
Sexburga
  B.Pr.   Kent   Cant.   St Sexburga, 675
111. Sinningthwaite   St Mary   C.Pr.   York, W.R.   York   Bertram Haget, c. 1160
112. Sopwell   St Mary   B.Pr.   Herts.   Linc.   Under abbey of St Albans
113. Stainfield   St Mary   B.Pr.   Linc.   Linc.   William or Henry de Percy, temp. or before
Henry II
114. Stamford   St Mary and St
Michael
  B.Pr.   Northants.   Linc.   William Waterville, Abbot of Peterborough,
c. 1155
115. Stixwould   St Mary   C.Pr.   Linc.   Linc.   Lucy, Countess of Perche, temp. Stephen
116. Stratford-by-
Bow
  St Leonard   B.Pr.   Midd.   Lon.   William, Bishop of London, temp. Henry I
117. Studley   St Mary   B.Pr.   Oxon   Linc.   Probably Bernard of St Valery, before 1176
118. Swaffham
Bulbeck
  ——   B.Pr.   Cambs.   Ely   Uncertain, before temp. John
119. Swine   St Mary   C.Pr.   York., E.R.   York   Robert de Verli, temp. Stephen
120. Syon   St Saviour, St
Mary and St
Bridget
  Brig.Ab.   Midd.   Lon.   King Henry V, 1414
121. Tarrant
Keynes
  St Mary and
All Saints
  C.Ab.   Dorset   Salis.   Ralph de Keynes, before 1235
122. Thetford   St George and
St Gregory
  B.Pr.   Norf.   Norw.   Hugh, Abbot of Bury St Edmunds, c. 1160
(removed from Ling)
123. Thicket   St Mary   B.Pr.   York., E.R.   York   Roger FitzRoger, temp. Richard I
124. Usk   ——   B.Pr.   Monm.   Llan.   Sir Richard de Clare, before 1236
125. Wallingwells   St Mary   B.Pr.   Notts.   York   Ralph de Chevrecourt, temp. Stephen
126. Waterbeach   St Mary of
Pity and
St Clare
  Fr.Pr.   Cambs.   Ely   Denise de Mountchesney, 1294. Removed
to Denny, 1348
127. Westwood   St Mary   B.Pr.   Worc.   Worc.   Osbert son of Hugh and Eustacia de Saye,
his mother, temp. Henry II (for nuns of
Fontevrault)
128. Wherwell   Holy Cross
and St Peter
  B.Ab.   Hants.   Win.   Queen Elfrida, c. 986
129. Whiston   St Mary Magd.   C.Pr.   Worc.   Worc.   Walter de Cantilupe, Bishop of Worcester,
before 1255
130. Wilberfoss   St Mary   B.Pr.   York.,E.R.   York   Uncertain, temp. Stephen
131. Wilton   St Mary, St
Barthlomew
and St Edith
  B.Ab.   Wilts.   Salis.   St Alburga, c. 800: refounded by King
Alfred, c. 871
132. Winchester   St Mary and St
Edburga
  B.Ab.   Hants.   Win.   King Alfred and Queen Ealhswith, c. 900.
Refounded by St Ethelwold, 963
133. Wintney   St Mary, St
Mary Magd.
and St John
Baptist
  C.Pr.   Hants.   Win.   Richard Holte and Christine his wife,
daughter of Thomas Cobreth, twelfth
century
134. Wix   St Mary   B.Pr.   Ess.   Lon.   Walter Mascherell, Alexander and Edith,
children of Walter the Deacon, temp.
Henry I
135. Wothorpe   St Mary   B.Pr.   Northants.   Linc.   Uncertain: united to St Michael’s,
Stamford, 1354
136. Wroxall   St Leonard   B.Pr.   Warw.   Worc.   Hugh, Lord of Hatton and Wroxall, temp.
Henry I
137. Wykeham   St Mary and St
Michael
  C.Pr.   York., N.R.   York   Pain FitzOsbert, c. 1153
138. Yedingham   St Mary   B.Pr.   York., E.R.   York   Helewise de Clere, before 1163