1. What is your opinion of Part I as an exposure of the Evolution Theory?
2. How can it be improved?
3. What fact or facts have been omitted from Part II that should be included in a true, safe, induction regarding the past of our globe?
4. Other remarks.
Name...........................................................
Street and number..................................
City......................................................
Profession or Occupation...........................................
Modern Science and Modern Christianity
By George McCready Price
The Evolution Theory in its whole range, from the Nebulous Cloud, the Cooling Earth, and the Origin of Life, through Geology and Biology up to the Moral Nature of Man, Carefully discussed in a Popular Style. No one, after reading it, could for a moment suppose that the Evolution Theory had been proved by sound scientific arguments, while the moral and religious tendencies of the doctrine are shown to be anti-Christian to the last degree.
Cloth bound, 272 pages, net, 75 cents. Postage extra.
God's Two Books
By George McCready Price
A pamphlet covering that part of the Evolution Theory which deals with Geology, Archæology, Darwinism, and ethics. It is especially full on Geology and Darwinism, and presents many facts and arguments on these subjects not found in anything now published. (In preparation).
PAPER COVERS, ABOUT 120 PAGES, 25 CENTS, POSTPAID.
THE MODERN HERETIC CO.
257 SO. HILL ST.,LOS ANGELES, CAL.
The Modern Heretic
A Magazine of Primal Orthodoxy
George McCready Price, Editor
We believe that the claims of Evolution, "Higher Criticism," New Theology, New Thought, Spiritism, etc., are unscientific and un-Christian. We realize that we are in a small minority, and that to assail these doctrines is to-day called heresy. But we have chosen our position deliberately, and shall abide by the consequences.
This journal will try to give the most recent discoveries in geology, biology, physiology and archæology, and to discuss their bearings on the Christian religion; and we think that no intelligent person can afford to be without its regular visits.
Monthly; 50c per year; sample copies free.
THE MODERN HERETIC CO.
[1] "Illogical Geology; Illustrations of Universal Progress," pp. 329-380; D. Appleton & Co., 1890.
[2] "The Glacial Nightmare and the Flood," Preface VII.
[3] "Discourses Biol. and Geol.," pp. 279-288.
[4] Nature, Nov. 28, 1901, pp. 76, 77.
[5] "History of Geology," p. 23.
[6] Zittel, p. 42.
[7] "Founders of Geology," p. 112; Johns Hopkins Press, 1901.
[8] "Principles," p. 50, 8th Ed.
[9] "History of the Inductive Sciences," vol. ii., p. 521.
[10] "Founders of Geology," pp. 237-8.
[11] "History," p. 112.
[12] Zittel, "History," p. 110. It should be noted that all these rocks in England thus examined by Smith make up only a small fraction of the total geological series—largely what we now call the Jurassic and Cretaceous rocks.
[13] The onion-coat hypothesis, which is the only other alternative, modern science professes to have abandoned.
[14] When the text-books speak of ten or twelve miles thickness of the fossiliferous rocks, the reader should remember how the rocks have to be patched up together from here and there to make this incredible thickness, as only a small fraction of such a thickness exists in any one place.
[15] "Manual," p. 399, Fourth Ed.
[16] "Manual," p. 408.
[17] "Manual of Historical Geol.," p. 74.
[18] "Hist.," p. 360.
[19] "Founders of Geology," p. 112.
[20] "Origin," Vol. II., p. 58: Sixth Ed. The first edition, I believe, contains the same language.
[21] "Text-Book," p. 842.
[22] Canadian "Annual Report," New Series, Vol. II., Part A, p. 8.
[23] "Annual Report," New Series, Vol. V., Part D, p. 52.
[24] "Manual," p. 367.
[25] "Ancient Life-History of the Earth," p. 40.
[26] "Text-Book," p. 837, Ed. of 1903.
[27] "Annual Report," New Series, Vol. II., Part D, pp. 33-34.
[28] pp. 111, 534.
[29] Nov. 13, 1884, pp. 29-35.
[30] See Nature, Jan. 24, 1901, p. 294.
[31] "Text-Book," p. 678.
[32] See Zittel, "History of Geol.," pp. 210, 211.
[33] See p. 39 of this volume.
[34] "Intro. Text-Book," p. 189.
[35] "Manual," p. 1007. Prof. Dana has italicized the word "suddenly."
[36] Howorth, "The Glacial Nightmare and the Flood," preface, xx, xxi.
[37] "Mammals, Living and Extinct," pp. 428-9.
[38] "Hist. of Geol.," pp. 375-6.
[39] pp. 400, 403, 405.
[40] "History," pp. 327, 341.
[41] See LeConte, "Evol. and Religious Thought," p. 253.
[42] "Modern Ideas of Evol.," p. 35.
[43] See "Manual," pp. 487-8.
[44] "Manual," p. 776.
[45] "Mammals, etc." p. 696.
[46] "Discourses Biol. and Geol.," p. 347.
[47] Zittel, "Hist. of Geo.," p. 388.
[48] Dana, "Manual," p. 59.
[49] "Manual," p. 793.
[50] "Manual," p. 488.
[51] "Distribution of Life," p. 33.
[52] "Manual," p. 611.
[53] "Manual," pp. 628-9.
[54] Note—This is only carrying the argument a little further than Huxley does when he says that "A Devonian fauna and flora in the British Islands may have been contemporaneous with Silurian life in North America, and with a Carboniferous fauna and flora in Africa. Geographical provinces and zones may have been as distinctly marked in the Palaeozoic epoch as at present." "Discourses," p. 286.
[55] "Manual," p. 229.
[56] Pop. Sci. Mo., Vol. xxi, pp. 143, 693.
[57] "Manual," p. 141.
[58] "Geol. and Min.," Vol. I., pp. 124-5. Ed. 1858.
[59] "Theoretical Geol.," p. 265. London, 1834.
[60] "Old Red Sandstone," pp. 48, 221-2.
[61] Pop. Sci. News, May, 1902, pp. 106-7.
[62] "Histor. Geol.," p. 53.
[63] "Acadian Geol.," p. 260.
[64] "Mammals," p. 430.
[65] "On Certain Phenomena, etc.," pp. 50-52.
[66] "Ancient Life-History," p. 300.
[67] "Manual," p. 736.
[68] "The Glacial Nightmare and the Flood," pp. 426-479.
[69] "Manual," pp. 484, 524-5.
[70] Op. cit., pp. 434-5.
[71] Id., p. 45.
[72] "Island Life," pp. 182, 195-6; "Nightmare," pp. 455-6.
[73] "Historical Geology," p. 76.
[74] "Manual," p. 997.
[75] p. 225, Edition of 1875.
[76] See Dana's "Manual," pp. 945, 977; also "The Glacial Nightmare," pp. 45-2, 511, etc.
[77] "Great Ice Age," p. 129; "Nightmare," p. 473.
[78] See Nature April 11, 1901, p. 560.
[79] "Manual," p. 487.
[80] pp. 618-9.
[81] Pop. Sc. News, May, 1902, p. 106.
[82] Dana, "Manual," p. 761.
[83] "Mammals, etc., p. 281.
[84] "Ancient Life-History," p. 357.
[85] "Manual," p. 998.
[86] "Modern Ideas of Evolution," Appendix.
[87] "Geol. Story Briefly Told," p. 229.
[88] "Controverted Questions of Geology," Article III., 1895.
[89] "Meeting-Place," pp. 28, 29.
[90] Pop. Sc. News, Feb. 1902.
[91] "Manual," p. 364.
[92] p. 367.
[93] (Note. In this discussion I have purposely ignored the various instances where human remains have been reported from deposits of even greater "antiquity" than the Middle Tertiaries.)
[94] "History," p. 320.
[95] "Modern Ideas of Evolution," p. 12.
[96] "Nature," May 23, 1901, pp. 75, 76.
[97] "Outlines," etc., p. 116.
[98] "Evolution and Religious Thought," pp. 314-316.
[99] "Outlines," etc., p. 119., 120.
Punctuation has been standardised—in particular, missing periods have been supplied where obviously required. All other original errors and inconsistencies have been retained except as follows; (the first line is the original text, the second the passage as currently stands):