[351] (1881), 17 Ch. D., 708; and see Bishop of Hereford v. Griffin (1848), 16 Sim., 190.
[352] [1894], 3 Ch., 663.
[353] And see Coote v. Judd (1883), 23 Ch. D., 727.
[354] [1902], 1 Ch., 264.
[355] (1889), 40 Ch. D., 425.
[356] Chitty, J., 40 Ch. D., at p. 431.
[357] Brown v. Cooke (1846), 16 L. J. Ch., 140; Richardson v. Gilbert (1851), 1 Sim. (N. S.), 336; Collingridge v. Emmott (1888), 57 L. T. (N. S.), 864; Trade Auxiliary v. Middlesborough (1889), 40 Ch. D., 425; Trade Auxiliary v. Jackson (1887), 4 T. L. R., 130.
[358] Trade Auxiliary v. Middlesborough (1889), 40 Ch. D., at p. 430.
[359] See cases cited, p. 79, footnote 4.
[360] See Chitty, J., Trade Auxiliary v. Middlesborough (1889), 40 Ch. D., at p. 430.
[361] See Johnson v. Newnes [1894], 3 Ch., 663.
[362] Mayhew v. Maxwell (1860), 1 J. and H., 312.
[363] Smith v. Johnson (1863), 4 Giff., 632.
[364] Mayhew v. Maxwell (1860), 1 J. and H., 312.
[365] Ibid.
[366] Hereford v. Griffin (1848), 16 Sim., 190.
[367] (1855), 16 C. B., 459.
[368] (1891), 64 L. T., 452.
[369] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45.
[370] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 15.
[372] (1824), 2 B. and Cr., 861; see Cary v. Kearsley (1802), 4 Esp., 168; Storace v. Longman (1788), 2 Camp., 26 n.
[373] (1814), 3 M. and S., 7.
[374] (1838), 9 Sim., 151.
[375] (1839), 8 L. J. Ch., 216; see Hodges v. Welsh (1840), 2 Ir. Eq. R., 266.
[376] (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815; see M'Lean v. Moody (1858), 20 D., 1154; Jefferys v. Kyle (1856), 18 D., 906; Cocks v. Purday (1848), 5 C. B., 860.
[377] 4 H. L. C., at p. 880.
[378] 4 H. L. C., at p. 907.
[379] Hazlitt v. Templeman (1866), 13 L. T. (N. S.), 593; Grace v. Newman (1875), L. R., 19 Eq., 623; Cox v. Cox (1853), 11 Hare, 118.
[380] See Frowde v. Parish (1896), 27 Ont Rep., 526; Macmillan v. Suresh Chunder Deb (1890), Ind. L. R., 17 Calc., 951.
[382] See Shepherd v. Conquest (1856), 17 C. B., 427; Eaton v. Lake (1888), 20 Q. B. D., 378.
[383] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 15; Leyland v. Stewart (1876), 4 Ch. D., 419; Power v. Walker (1814), 3 M. and S., 7; Davidson v. Bohn (1848), 6 C. B., 456; Clementi v. Walker (1824), 2 Bar. and Cres., 861; Jefferys v. Boosey (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815; [See the judgment of Lord St. Leonards at p. 944; but note also that Coleridge, J., at p. 906, expressed his disapproval of the reasoning in Power v. Walker and Davidson v. Bohn]; Kyle v. Jefferys (1859), 3 Macq., 611, 617, 18 D., 906; Cumberland v. Copeland (1862), 1 H. and C., 194; Cocks v. Purday (1848), 5 C. B., 860; see Drone on "Copyright," pp. 304-316, where the soundness of the case law that assignment must be in writing is doubted.
[384] Kyle v. Jefferys (1859), 3 Macq., 611; Jefferys v. Boosey (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815.
[385] Morton v. Copeland (1855), 16 C. B., 517.
[386] Liverpool General Brokers v. Commercial Press [1897], 2 Q. B., 1; see contra opinion of Lord Cockburn in Wood v. Boosey (1867), 7 B. and S., at p. 897; Morang v. Publishers (1900), 32 Ont. Rep., 393.
[387] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 13.
[388] Stevens v. Wildy (1850), 19 L. J. Ch., 190.
[389] Ibid.
[390] Liverpool General Brokers v. Commercial Press [1897], 2 Q. B., 1.
[391] Levy v. Rutley (1871), L. R., 6 C. P., 523; Leader v. Purday (1849), 7 C. B., 4; Colburn v. Duncombe (1838), 9 Sim., 151; London Printing and Publishing Co. v. Cox [1891], 3 Ch., 291.
[392] Leader v. Purday (1849), 7 C. B., 4.
[393] Lacy v. Toole (1867), 15 L. T. (N. S.), 512.
[394] Tree v. Bowkett (1895), 74 L. T. (N. S.), 77; Lover v. Davidson (1856), 1 C. B. (N. S.), 182; Latour v. Bland (1818), 2 Stark, 382; Levy v. Rutley (1871), L. R., 6 C. P., 523; Colburn v. Duncombe (1838), 9 Sim., 151; but see Kyle v. Jefferys (1859), 3 Macq., 611, 18 D., 911.
[395] Cooper v. Stephens [1895], 1 Ch., 567; Marshall v. Petty (1900), 17 T. L. R., 501.
[396] Morris v. Kelly (1820), 1 Jac. and W., 481.
[397] Dennison v. Ashdown (1897), 13 T. L. R., 226.
[398] Sweet v. Cater (1841), 11 Sim., 572; Sweet v. Shaw (1839), 8 L. J. Ch., 216; Sims v. Marryat (1851), 17 Q. B., 281; Strahan v. Graham (1867), 16 L. T. (N. S.), 87; Thombleson v. Black (1837), 1 Jur., 198.
[399] Dupuy v. Dilkes (1879), 48 L. J. Ch., 682; Chappell v. Purday (1843), 12 M. and W., 303.
[400] Taylor v. Pillow (1869), L. R., 7 Eq., 418; Howitt v. Hall (1862), 6 L. T. (N. S.), 348.
[401] Sims v. Marryat (1851), 17 Q. B., 281; Queensberry v. Shebbeare (1758), 2 Eden Cha. Cas., 330; Williams' "Law of Personal Property," 15th edition, p. 523.
[402] Powell v. Head (1879), 12 Ch. D., 686.
[403] Lauri v. Renad [1892], 3 Ch., 402.
[404] Powell v. Head (1879), 12 Ch. D., 686.
[405] (1854), 4 H. L. C., at p. 940; and see Cocks v. Purday (1848), 5 C. B., 860.
[406] (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815.
[407] Taylor v. Neville (1878), 26 W. R., 299; Tree v. Bowkett (1895), 74 L. T. (N. S.), 77; see doubt expressed in Shepherd v. Conquest (1856), 17 C. B., at p. 436.
[408] Lucas v. Cooke (1880), 13 Ch. D., 872.
[409] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 13.
[410] (1889), 40 Ch. D., 434, 435.
[411] Holt v. Woods (1896), 17 N. S. W. R., Eq., 36.
[412] See ex parte Dobson (1892), 12 N. Z. L. R., 171.
[413] See contra Howitt v. Hall (1862), 6 L. T. (N. S.), 348; Sweet v. Cater (1840), 11 Sim., 572; Davidson v. Bohn (1848), 6 C. B., 458.
[414] Rippon v. Norton(1839), 2 Beav., 63.
[415] Hole v. Bradbury [1879], 12 Ch. D., 886; Stevens v. Bradbury [1854], 1 K. and J., 168; Reade v. Bentley(1857), 3 K. and J., 271; Cooper v. Stephens [1895], 1 Ch., 567; ex parte Bastow [1854], 14 C. B., 631.
[416] Trade Auxiliary v. Middlesborough (1889), 40 Ch. D., 425, per Cotton, L. J.; Tuck and Sons v. Canton (1882), 51 L. J., Q. B., 363; Sweet v. Cater (1841), 11 Sim., 572.
[417] Taylor v. Neville (1878), 26 W. R., 299; Tree v. Bowkett (1895), 74 L. T., 77.
[418] (1878), 26 W. R., 297.
[419] Warne v. Routledge (1874), L. R., 18 Eq., 497; see Sweet v. Cater (1841), 11 Sim., 572; Stevens v. Benning (1855), 1 K. and J., 168.
[420] Latour v. Bland (1818), 2 Stark, 382.
[421] Willis v. Curtois (1838), 1 Beav., 189.
[422] See Mawman v. Tegg (1826), 2 Russ., at p. 392.
[423] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, secs. 15 and 2.
[424] See Butterworth v. Kelly (1888), 4 T. L. R., 430; Leader v. Strange (1849), 2 Car. and K., 1010.
[425] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, secs. 15 and 23. The remedies given by these two sections are cumulative, and may be recovered by one action; Muddock v. Blackwood [1898], 1 Ch., 58.
[426] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 17; 39 and 40 Vict. c. 36, sec. 42.
[427] Ignorance will not excuse in the case of importing, but contra in the case of selling or hiring, Cooper v. Whittingham (1880), 15 Ch. D., 501.
[428] Cooper v. Whittingham (1880). 15 Ch. D., 501.
[429] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 17; and see 39 & 40 Vict. c. 36, sec. 42.
[430] £5 to the use of the officer of customs, remainder to the use of the proprietor of copyright.
[431] Ibid.
[432] Cooper v. Whittingham (1880), 15 Ch. D., 501.
[433] [1901], 1 Ch., 374.
[434] Cf. Colburn v. Simms (1843), 2 Hare, 543.
[435] [1901], 1 Ch., 374.
[436] Novella v. Sudlow (1852), 12 C. B., 177; and see Beckford v. Hood (1798), 7 T. R., 620; Cambridge University v. Bryer (1812), 16 East, at p. 322.
[437] Muddock v. Blackwood [1898], 1 Ch., 58; Pike v. Nicholas (1869), L. R., 5 Ch., 251, at pp. 255 and 260.
[438] Hogg v. Kirby (1803), 8 Ves., 215, at p. 223; Grimson v. Eyre (1804), 9 Ves., 341, at p. 346; Kelly v. Hooper (1841), 1 Y. and C., 197, at p. 199; Colburn v. Simms (1843), 2 Hare, 543.
[439] Delfe v. Delamotte (1857), 3 K. and J., 581; but see Pike v. Nicholas (1869), L. R., 5 Ch., 251.
[440] Baily v. Taylor (1829), 1 R. and M., 73; Price's Patent Candles v. Bauwen (1858), 4 K. and J., 727; Delondre v. Shaw (1828), 2 Sim., 240; Sweet v. Maughan (1840), 11 Sim., 51.
[441] Eldon, L. C., in Mawman v. Tegg (1826), 2 Russ., at p. 400.
[442] Cooper v. Whittingham (1880), 15 Ch. D., 501.
[443] M'Neill v. Williams (1847), 11 Jur., 344; Hogg v. Kirby (1803), 8 Ves., 215.
[444] Hall, V. C., in Maple v. Junior Army and Navy Stores (1882), 21 Ch. D., at p. 372.
[445] Chappell v. Davidson (1856), 8 De G. M. and G., 1.
[446] Novella v. James (1854), 24 L. J. Ch., 111.
[447] Southey v. Sherwood (1817), 2 Mer., 435; Platt v. Button (1815), 19 Ves., 447; Saunders v. Smith (1838), 3 My. and C., 711; Lewis v. Chapman (1840), 3 Beav., 133; Assignees of Robinson v. Wilkins (1805), 8 Ves., 224, n; Baily v. Taylor (1829), 1 Russ. and My., 73; Rundell v. Murray (1821), Jac., 311; and see Buxton v. James (1851), 5 De G. and Sm., 80.
[448] Morris v. Ashbee (1868), L. R., 7 Eq., 34.
[449] Per Gifford, V. C., L. R., 7 Eq., at p. 39.
[450] Hogg v. Scott (1874), L. R., 18 Eq., 444.
[451] Per Turner, L. J., in Johnson v. Wyatt (1863), 2 De G., J. and S., at p. 25.
[452] Lewis v. Fullarton (1839), 2 Beav., 6; Kelly v. Morris (1866), L. R., 1 Eq., 697; Mawman v. Tegg (1826), 2 Russ., 385.
[453] Jarrold v. Houlston (1857), 3 K. and J., 708; Lamb v. Evans [1892], 3 Ch., 462.
[454] [1892], 3 Ch., 462.
[455] Campbell v. Scott (1842), 11 Sim., 31; Tinsley v. Lacy (1863), 1 H. and M., 747.
[456] Borthwick v. Evening Post (1888), 37 Ch. D., 449.
[457] 37 Ch. D., at p. 462.
[458] (1889), 40 Ch. D., 500.
[459] 40 Ch. D., at p. 507; and see Trade Auxiliary v. Middlesborough (1889), 40 Ch. D., 425.
[460] Bradbury v. Sharp (1891), W. N., 143.
[461] Cox v. Land and Water (1869), L. R., 9 Eq., 324; Southern v. Bailes (1829), 38 S. J., 681.
[462] Cox v. Land and Water (1869), L. R., 9 Eq., 324; Baily v. Taylor (1829), 1 R. and M., 73.
[463] Lewis v. Fullarton (1839), 2 Beav., 6, Langdale, M. R., at p. 11.
[464] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 23. To be safe the demand in writing should be made before the writ is issued.
[465] 8 Anne c. 19, sec. 1; 54 Geo. III. c. 156, sec. 4.
[466] Colburn v. Simms (1843), 2 Hare, 543.
[467] Prince Albert v. Strange (1849), 2 De G. and Sm., 652; Kelly v. Hodge(1873), 29 L. T. (N. S.), 387; Emperor of Austria v. Day (1861), 3 D. F. and J., 217.
[468] Hole v. Bradbury (1879), 12 Ch. D., 886; but see Delfe v. Delamotte (1857), 3 K. and J., 581; Stannard v. Harrison (1871), 19 W. R., 811.
[469] Hole v. Bradbury (1879), 12 Ch. D., 886; cf. Colburn v. Simms (1843), 2 Hare, 543.
[470] Isaacs v. Fiddemann (1880), 49 L. J. Ch., 412.
[471] Rooney v. Kelly (1861), 14 Ir. C. L. R., per O'Brien, J., at p. 171.
[472] Warne v. Seebohm (1888), 39 Ch. D., 73.
[473] Ibid.
[474] Warne v. Seebohm (1888), 39 Ch. D., at p. 83.
[475] Colburn v. Simms (1843), 2 Hare, 543; Hole v. Bradbury( 1879), 12 Ch. D., 886.
[476] 39 & 40 Vict. c. 36, sec. 42.
[477] 39 & 40 Vict. c. 36, sec. 44.
[478] Brooke v. Milliken (1789), 3 T. R., 509.
[479] Ex parte Beal (1868), L. R., 3 Q. B., 387.
[480] Hogg v. Scott (1874), L. R., 18 Eq., 444; see Macmillan v. Suresh Chunder Deb (1850), Ind. L. R., 17 Calc., 951.
[481] (1846), 9 D., 1026; and see Clark v. Bell (1804), Mor. Dic., Literary Property, App., 9.
[482] (1878), 10 Ch. D., 247, at p. 262.
[483] 56 & 57 Vict. c. 61; Muddock v. Blackwood [1898], 1 Ch., at p. 64.
[484] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 16; Hole v. Bradbury (1879), 12 Ch. D., 886.
[485] Boosey v. Davidson (1846), 4 Dow. and Low, at p. 155.
[486] Collette v. Goode (1878), 7 Ch. D., 842; Boosey v. Purday (1846), 10 Jur., 1038; Boosey v. Davidson (1846), 4 D. and L., 147; Leader v. Purday (1849), 7 C. B., 4; Barnett v. Glossop (1835), 1 Bing. N. C., 633; 1 Scott's Rep., 621.
[487] Chappell v. Davidson (1856), 18 C. B., 194.
[488] Collette v. Goode (1878), 7 Ch. D., 842.
[489] Boosey v. Davidson (1846), 4 D. and L., 147; Hole v. Bradbury (1879), 12 Ch. D., 886.
[490] Ibid.
[491] Collette v. Goode (1878), 7 Ch. D., 842.
[492] Sweet v. Benning (1855), 16 C. B., 459; Cocks v. Purday (1848), 5 C. B., 860.
[493] Hayward v. Lely (1887), 56 L. T. (N. S.), 418.
[494] Coote v. Judd (1883), 23 Ch. D., 736; Hole v. Bradbury (1879), 12 Ch. D., 886; Collette v. Goode (1878), 7 Ch. D., 842; but see Leader v. Purday (1848), 6 Dow. and Low, 408.
[495] Collette v. Goode (1878), 7 Ch. D., 842.
[496] Ibid.
[497] Hayward v. Lely (1887), 56 L. T. (N. S.), 418.
[498] Harris v. Smart (1889), W. N., 92, 5 T. L. R. 594.
[499] But see Sweet v. Maughan (1840), 11 Sim., 51.
[500] Eldon, L. C., in Mawman v. Tegg (1826), 2 Russ., at p. 394.
[501] Hotten v. Arthur (1863), 1 H. and M., 603; Jarrold v. Houlston (1857), 3 K. and J., 708.
[502] Ibid.
[503] Boosey v. Davidson (1849), 13 Q. B., 257.
[504] Wright v. Goodlake (1865), 3 H. and C., 540.
[505] Kelly v. Wyman (1869), 17 W. R. 399; Stevens v. Brett (1864), 10 L. T. (N. S.), 231.
[506] Coote v. Ingram (1887), 35 Ch. D., 117.
[507] Maxwell v. Somerton (1874), 22 W. R., 313.
[508] Walter v. Steinkopff [1892], 3 Ch., 189.
[509] Wall v. Taylor (1883), 11 Q. B. D., 102.
[510] Dicks v. Brooks (1880), 15 Ch. D., 22.
[511] Metzler v. Wood (1878), 8 Ch. D., 606.
[512] Lord Romilly, M. R., in Cobbett v. Woodward (1872), L. R., 14 Eq., at p. 414; Hall, V. C., in Maple v. Junior Army and Navy Stores, 21 Ch. D., at p. 373.
[513] Piddington v. Philip (1893), 14 N. S. W. R., Eq., 159.
[514] Kelly's Directories v. Gavin & Lloyds [1901], 1 Ch., 374; affirmed in the Court of Appeal.