[515] Pike v. Nicholas (1869), L. R., 5 Ch., 251; Cobbett v. Woodward (1872), L. R., 14 Eq., 407.
[516] Liverpool General Brokers v. Commercial Press [1897], 2 Q. B., 1.
[517] Page v. Wisden (1869), 20 L. T., 435.
[518] James, L. J., in Dicks v. Yates (1881), 18 Ch. D., 76.
[519] Jessel, M. R., in Maple v. Junior Army and Navy Stores, 21 Ch. D., at p. 378.
[520] Lord Ellenborough in Roworth v. Wilkes (1807), 1 Camp., at p. 97.
[521] Novello v. Sudlow (1852), 12 C. B., 177.
[522] White v. Geroch (1819), 2 B. and Ald., 298; Lindley, M. R., in Boosey v. Whight [1900], 1 Ch., at p. 123.
[523] Novello v. Sudlow (1852), 12 C. B., 177.
[524] Warne v. Seebohm (1888), 39 Ch. D., 73.
[525] See Lindley, M. R., in Boosey v. Whight [1900], 1 Ch., at p. 123.
[526] Bach v. Longman(1777), 2 Cowp., 623; D'Almaine v. Boosey(1835), 1 Y. and C., Ex., 288.
[527] Nicols v. Pitman [1884], 26 Ch. D., 374.
[528] Boosey v. Whight [1900], 1 Ch., 122.
[529] Lord O'Hagan in Chatterton v. Cave (1878), 3 A. C., at p. 498.
[530] (1855), 16 C. B., at p. 481.
[531] (1875), L. R., 10 C. P., at p. 575.
[532] See also Bohn v. Bogue (1846), 10 Jur., 420; Jarrold v. Heywood (1870), 18 W. R., 279; Baily v. Taylor (1829), 1 R. and M., 73.
[533] (1878). 3 A. C., 483.
[534] (1869), L. R., 5 Ch., 251.
[535] Leslie v. Young [1894], A. C., at p. 342.
[536] Cary v. Kearsley (1802), 4 Esp., 168; Lennie v. Pillans (1843), 5 D., 416; Cooper v. Stephens [1895], 1 Ch., 567.
[537] Per Page Wood, V. C., in Tinsley v. Lacey (1863), 1 H. and M., at p. 752.
[538] Per L. C. Herschell in Leslie v. Young [1894], A. C., at p. 341.
[539] See Murray v. Bogue(1852), 1 Drew, at p. 369.
[540] Per Cottenham, L. C., in Bramwell v. Halcomb (1836), 3 My. and Cr., at p. 738; see Scott v. Stanford (1867), L. R., 3 Eq., 718.
[541] Bradbury v. Hotten (1872), L. R., 8 Ex., 1; see also Cooper v. Stephens [1895], 1 Ch., 567.
[542] (1826), 2 Russ., at p. 394.
[543] (1897), 13 T. L. R., 209; and see Kelly v. Hooper (1841), 1 Y. and C. Ch. C., 197; Cooper v. Stephens [1895], 1 Ch., 567.
[544] Trade Auxiliary v. Middlesborough (1889), 40 Ch. D., 425; Cate v. Devon (1889), 40 Ch. D., 500.
[545] Trade Auxiliary v. Middlesborough (1889), 40 Ch. D., 425; Cate v. Devon (1889), 40 Ch. D., 500.
[546] 40 Ch. D., at p. 507.
[547] Jarrold v. Houlston (1857), 3 K. and J., 708.
[548] (1802), 4 Esp., 168.
[549] Jarrold v. Houlston (1857), 3 K. and J., 708.
[550] Per Lord Ellenborough in Cary v. Kearsley (1802), 4 Esp., at p. 170.
[551] Roworth v. Wilkes (1807), 1 Camp., 97.
[552] Per Shadwell, V. C., in Campbell v. Scott (1842), 11 Sim., 31; Clement v. Maddick (1859), 1 Giff., 98; Reade v. Lacy (1861), 1 J. and H., 524; Scott v. Stanford (1867), L. R., 3 Eq.,718.
[553] (1867), L. R., 3 Eq., 718.
[554] (1802), 4 Esp., 168.
[555] See also Bohn v. Bogue (1846), 10 Jur., 420.
[556] Per Sir W. Page Wood, V. C., in Scott v. Stanford (1867), L. R., 3 Eq., 718, at p. 723; and see Kelly v. Morris (1866), L. R., 1 Eq., 697.
[557] Jarrold v. Houlston (1857), 3 K. and J., 708; Reade v. Lacey (1861), 1 J. and H., 524; Spiers v. Brown (1858), 31 L. T. (O. S.), 18; 6 W. R., 352.
[558] (1847), 9 D., 748.
[559] Hotten v. Arthur (1863), 1 H. and M., 603.
[560] Novello v. Sudlow (1852), 12 C. B., 177.
[561] Ager v. The P. & O. (1884), 26 Ch. D., 637; and see Oxford and Cambridge v. Gill (1899), 43 S. J., 570.
[562] Murray v. Bogue (1852), 1 Drew, 353.
[563] Reade v. Lacey (1861), 1 J. and H., 524; Reade v. Conquest (1862), 11 C. B. (N. S.), 479.
[564] (1889), 40 Ch. D., 500; Cooper v. Whittingham (1880), 15 Ch. D., 501.
[565] See Lord Blackburn in Chatterton v. Cave, 3 A. C., at p. 501; Novello v. Sudlow (1852), 12 C. B., 177; Rock v. Lazarus (1872), L. R. 15 Eq., 104; Lee v. Simpson (1847), 3 C. B., 871.
[566] Maxwell v. Somerton (1874), 22 W. R., 313.
[567] Wyatt v. Barnard (1814), 3 V. and B., 77.
[568] [1892], 3 Ch., 489.
[569] [1892], 3 Ch., 489, per North, J., at p. 499.
[570] This summary of "fair use" is taken from Stephen's Digest "Report of Copyright Commission," 1878, p. lxx.
[571] Sayre v. Moore (1785), 1 East., 361, n.; Hogg v. Kirby (1803), 8 Ves., 215; Matthewson v. Stockdale (1806), 12 Ves., 270; Mawman v. Tegg (1826), 2 Russ., 385; Pike v. Nicholas (1869), L. R., 5 Ch., 251; Alexander v. Mackenzie (1847), 9 D., 748 at p. 761; Longman v. Winchester (1809), 16 Ves., 269; Wilkins v. Aikin (1810), 17 Ves., 422; Weekes v. Williamson (1886), 12 Vict., L. R., 483.
[572] Lindley, L. J., Lamb v. Evans [1893], 1 Ch., at p. 224.
[573] Hogg v. Kirby (1803), 8 Ves., 215.
[574] Per Lord Chancellor Erskine in Matthewson v. Stockdale (1806), 12 Ves., at p. 273.
[575] Wilson v. Lake (1875), 1 Vict. L. R., Eq., 127.
[576] Lindley., L. J., in Hollinrake v. Truswell [1894], 3 Ch., at p. 427.
[577] Jarrold v. Houlston (1857), 3 K. and J., 708.
[578] Morris v. Ashbee (1868), L. R., 7 Eq., 34; Lennie v. Pillans (1843), 5 D., 416; Mawman v. Tegg (1826), 2 Russ., 385; Lindley, L. J., in Lamb v. Evans [1893], 1 Ch., at p. 224.
[579] Pike v. Nicholas (1869), L. R., 5 Ch., 251, at p. 260.
[580] (1866), L. R., 1 Eq., 697.
[581] (1809), 16 Ves., 269; and see Matthewson v. Stockdale (1806), 1 J. and H., 312; Baily v. Taylor (1829), 1 Russ. and Mylne, 73; Wilkins v. Aikin (1810), 17 Ves., at p. 424.
[582] (1839), 2 Beav., 6., at p. 8.
[583] And see Garland v. Gemmill (1887), 14 S. C. R. (Canada), 321.
[584] Jarrold v. Houlston (1857), 3 K. and J., 708.
[585] 3 K. and J., at p. 715.
[586] 1 H. and M., 603.
[587] (1866), L. R., 1 Eq., 697.
[588] See Hogg v. Scott (1874), L. R., 18 Eq., 444.
[589] (1867), L. R., 3 Eq., 718.
[590] (1868), L. R., 7 Eq., 34.
[591] (1866), L. R., 1 Eq., 697.
[592] (1839), 2 Beav., 6.
[593] See Garland v. Gemmill (1887), 14 S. C. R. (Canada), 321.
[594] Morris v. Ashbee (1868), L. R., 7 Eq., 34, per Giffard, V. C., at pp. 40, 41.
[595] (1870), L. R., 5 Ch., 279.
[596] (1866), L. R., 1 Eq., 697.
[597] (1868), L. R., 7 Eq., 34.
[598] (1866), L. R., 1 Eq., 697.
[599] Per Giffard, L. J., L. R., 5 Ch., at p. 285.
[600] (1869), L. R., 5 Ch., 251.
[601] Hatherley, L. C., L. R., 5 Ch., at p. 263; and see Longman v. Winchester(1809), 16 Ves., at p. 271; Moffat & Paige v. Gill (1902), C. A., April 25.
[602] Per Giffard, L. J., L. R., 5 Ch., at p. 268.
[603] Matthewson v. Stockdale (1806), 1 J. and H., 312; Walter v. Lane [1900], A. C., 539; Kelly v. Morris (1866), L. R., 1 Eq., 697; Morris v. Wright (1870), L. R., 5 Ch., 279; Batty v. Taylor (1829), 1 Russ. and Mylne, 73.
[604] Wilkins v. Aikin (1810), 17 Ves., 422.
[605] (1872), L. R., 8 Ex., 1.
[606] Per Kelly, C. B., L. R. 8 Ex., 1, at p. 5.
[607] (1872), L. R., 8 Ex., 1.
[608] (1884), 26 Ch. D., 374.
[609] Roworth v. Wilkes (1807), 1 Camp., 94; Murray v. MacFarquhar (1785), M., 8309.
[610] Sweet v. Shaw (1839), 3 Jur., 217.
[611] Hodges v. Welsh (1840), 2 Ir. Eq. Rep., 266.
[612] Sweet v. Shaw (1839), 3 Jur., 217.
[613] (1855), 16 C. B., 459.
[614] (1838), 3 Myl. and Cr., 711.
[615] (1840), 2 Ir. Eq. R., 266.
[616] (1826), 2 Russ., 385, at p. 393; see Lord Kinloch in Black v. Murray (1870), 9 M., at p. 356.
[617] Whittingham v. Wooler (1817), 2 Swanst, 428; Wilkins v. Aikin (1810), 17 Ves., 422.
[618] Bell v. Whitehead(1839), 8 L. J. Ch., 141.
[619] Per Lord Ellenborough in Roworth. v. Wilkes (1807), 1 Camp., 94, at p. 97.
[620] (1842), 11 Sim., 31.
[621] (1874), 31 L. T. (N. S.), 775.
[622] (1785), 1 East., 361, n.
[623] (1802), 4 Esp., 168; and see Carnan v. Bowles (1786), 1 Cox, Eq. Cas., 283.
[624] (1833), 6 Sim., 297.
[625] (1835), 1 Y. and C. Ex., 288.
[626] Wood v. Boosey (1868), L. R., 3 Q. B., 223, 9 B. and S., 175.
[627] Warne v. Seebohm (1888), 39 Ch. D., 73; Oxford and Cambridge v. Gill (1899), 43, S. J., 570; Jarrold v. Houlston (1857), 3 K. and J., 708; Kelly v. Morris (1866), L. R., 1 Eq., 697; Scott v. Stanford (1867), L. R., 3 Eq., 718.
[628] Leslie v. Young [1894], A. C., Lord Herschell, at p. 341.
[630] Tinsley v. Lacy (1863), 1 H. and M., 747; Murray v. Elliston (1822), 5 B. and Ald., 657; Reade v. Conquest (1861), 9 C. B. (N. S.), 755; Toole v. Young (1874), L. R., 9 Q. B., 523.
[631] Tinsley v.Lacy (1863), 1 H. and M., 747.
[632] (1888), 39 Ch. D., 73.
[633] Tinsley v. Lacy (1863), 1 H. and M., 747.
[634] See Stephen's "Digest," Art. 9 ("Report Copyright Commission," 1878, p. lxx.).
[635] Gyles v. Wilcox (1740), 2 Atk., 142.
[636] Ibid.
[637] Tonson v. Walker (1752), 3 Swans., 672, at p. 681; Millar v. Taylor (1769), 4 Burr., Willes, J., at p. 2311; Bell v. Walker (1785), 1 Bro. Ch. C., 450; Murray v. Elliston (1822), 1 Dow and Ry., 299; Butterworth v. Robinson (1801), 5 Ves., 709.
[638] (1761), Amb., 402; and see Anonymous Case (1774), Lofft., 775.
[639] (1835), 1 Y. and C., Ex., 288.
[640] Per Lord Lyndhurst, L. C. B., at p. 301.
[641] (1761), Amb., 402.
[642] Dickens v. Lee (1844), 8 Jur., 183, at p. 184.
[643] Tinsley v. Lacy (1863), 1 H. and M., 747, at p. 754; and see the observations of the same judge in Spiers v. Brown (1858), 6 W. R., 352.
[644] Munshi v. Mirza (1890), Ind. L. R., 14 Bomb., 586; Macmillan v. Shamsal (1894), Ind. L. R., 19 Bomb., 557.
[645] (1720), 2 Meriv., at p. 441.
[646] (1769), 4 Burr., Yates J., at p. 2348.
[647] (1849), 2 De G. and M., at p. 693.
[648] (1814), 3 V. and B., 77.
[649] (1852), 1 Drew, 353.
[650] Nicols v. Pitman (1884), 26 Ch. D., 374.
[651] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 15.
[652] Morton v. Copeland (1855), 16 C. B., 517.
[653] London Printing v. Cox [1891], 3 Ch., 291.
[654] Morton v. Copeland (1855), 16 C. B., 517.
[655] Ibid.
[656] Cooper v. Stephens [1895], 1 Ch., 567; Allen v. Lyon(1884), 5 Out. Rep., 615; but see Eaton v. Lake (1888), 20 Q. B. D., 378; Strahan v. Graham (1867), 16 L. T. (N. S.), 87.
[657] Ager v. P. & O. (1884), 26 Ch. D., 637.
[658] Coleridge, J., in Jefferys v. Boosey (1854), 4 H. L. C., at p. 906.
[659] But see Willes, J., at pp. 2311 and 2332, and Aston, J., at p. 2346, in Millar v. Taylor (1769), 4 Burr., 2303.
[660] Southey v. Sherwood (1817), 2 Mer., 435; Rundell v. Murray (1821), Jac., 311.
[661] Weldon v. Dicks (1878), 10 Ch. D., 247.
[662] Hogg v. Scott (1874), L. R., 18 Eq., at p. 455; Morris v. Ashbee (1868), L. R., 7 Eq., 34; Rundell v. Murray (1821), Jac., 311; Saunders v. Smith (1838), 3 My. and Cr., 711; Platt v. Button (1815), 19 Ves., 447; Latour v. Bland (1818), 2 Stark, 382; Pitman v. Hine (1884), 1 T. L. R., 39; Weldon v. Dicks (1878), 10 Ch. D., 247.
[663] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 5.
[664] Reade v. Conquest (1861), 9 C. B. (N. S.), 755; Tinsley v. Lacy (1863), 1 H. and M., 747.
[665] Reade v. Conquest (1863), 11 C. B. (N. S.), 479. Schlesinger v. Turner (1890), 63 L. T., 764.
[666] Toole v. Young (1874), L. R., 9 Q. B., 523.
[667] Schlesinger v. Bedford (1890), 63 L. T., 762.
[668] Warne v. Seebohm (1888), 39 Ch. D., 73.
[669] See Clark v. Bishop (1872), 25 L. T., 908.
[670] Macklin v. Richardson (1770), Amb., 694.
[672] (1882), 21 Ch. D., 232.
[673] Macklin v. Richardson (1770), Amb., 694.
[674] 3 & 4 Will. IV. c. 15, sec. 1; 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, secs. 15, 2.
[675] (1820), 1 Jac. and W., 481.
[676] (1864), 17 C. B. (N. S.), 418, at p. 426.
[677] (1822) 5 B. and Ald., 657.
[678] (1774), 4 Burr., 2408.
[679] (1793), 5 T. R., 245; and see dictum of Cockburn, C. J., in Toole v. Young (1874), L. R., 9 Q. B., at p. 527.
[680] See supra, p. 13.
[681] Chatterton v. Cave (1875), L. R., 10 C. P., 572; Hatton v. Kean (1859), 7 C. B. (N. S.), 268.
[682] Reade v. Conquest (1861), 9 C. B. (N. S.), 755; Tinsley v. Lacy (1863), 1 H. and M., 747; Toole v. Young (1874), L. R., 9 Q. B., 523; Warne v. Seebohm (1888), 39 Ch. D., 73.
[683] (1847), 3 C. B., 871.
[684] (1848), 12 Q. B., 217.
[685] (1872), 25 L. T., 908.
[686] (1883), 11 Q. B. D., 102.