| PAGE | |
| 1820 Precarious position of the ministry, | 1364 |
| Cato Street conspiracy, | 1365 |
| The Queen's trial, | 1366 |
| 1821 Consequent alienation between ministry and people, | 1368 |
| 1822 Peel and Wellesley join the ministry, | 1369 |
| Death of Castlereagh. Canning Foreign Secretary, | 1369 |
| Retrospect of the affairs of Europe, | 1370 |
| 1816 Position of England abroad, | 1370 |
| Effect of Castlereagh's policy, | 1371 |
| 1820 Insurrections in Spain, Portugal, Naples, | 1371 |
| Arbitrary action of the Holy Alliance, | 1372 |
| England refuses to join the Congress at Troppau, | 1373 |
| 1821 Popular anger at Castlereagh's weak policy, | 1373 |
| Insurrection in Greece, | 1374 |
| Complications between France and Spain, | 1374 |
| 1822 Congress at Verona, | 1375 |
| Canning's policy, | 1375 |
| Partial success of his diplomacy in Spain, | 1375 |
| 1823 Changes in commercial policy effected by Huskisson, | 1376 |
| Change of the Navigation Act, | 1379 |
| 1824 Improvement in the silk trade, | 1380 |
| Improvement in the wool trade, | 1381 |
| 1823 Discussion on slavery, | 1382 |
| Effect of Canning's circular in Jamaica, | 1382 |
| 1824 Persecution of Mr. Smith, | 1383 |
| 1825 Disastrous effects of wild speculations, | 1383 |
| Success of the healing measures of Government, | 1384 |
| 1826 Temporary change in the corn laws, | 1385 |
| Canning's vigorous policy in Portugal, | 1386 |
| Division in the ministry, | 1387 |
| 1827 Illness of Lord Liverpool, | 1388 |
| Difficulties attending the formation of a new ministry, | 1388 |
| Disturbances in Ireland, | 1389 |
| Wellesley's administration, | 1389 |
| 1823 The Catholic Association, | 1390 |
| 1826 Rejection of the Catholic Relief Bill, | 1390 |
| 1827 Rejection of Burdett's resolution, | 1391 |
| Canning Prime Minister, | 1391 |
| Canning's death, | 1393 |
| His character and policy, | 1393 |
| Goderich's ministry, | 1394 |
| 1828 Wellington's ministry, | 1395 |
| Difficulty of the Turkish question, | 1395 |
| 1824 Canning's diplomacy on the subject, | 1396 |
| 1826 Protocol between England and Russia, | 1397 |
| Enthusiasm for Greek independence in England, | 1397 |
| 1827 Turkey refuses the armistice, | 1398 |
| The Treaty of London, | 1398 |
| Attempt to enforce the armistice, | 1399 |
| Battle of Navarino, | 1399 |
| Goderich's inaction renders the victory nugatory, | 1400 |
| 1828 Wellington refuses to coerce Turkey by arms, | 1400 |
| Character of Wellington's Government, | 1401 |
| Repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts, | 1401 |
| The Corn Bill passed, | 1402 |
| Huskisson and his friends resign, | 1402 |
| The Catholic Emancipation question, | 1402 |
| Renewed agitation in Ireland, | 1403 |
| Election of O'Connell for Clare, | 1403 |
| Influence of the Association, | 1404 |
| 1829 Resignation of Lord Anglesey, | 1406 |
| Peel and Wellington see the urgency of Catholic emancipation, | 1406 |
| Opposition of the King, | 1407 |
| The Catholic Emancipation Bill passed, | 1408 |
| O'Connell's agitation for repeal, | 1409 |
| Wellington's foreign policy, | 1410 |
| 1826 Affairs of Portugal, | 1410 |
| 1828 Miguel usurps the throne, | 1411 |
| Maria acknowledged in England, | 1411 |
| 1829 Wellington's neutrality, | 1411 |
| Non-intervention in the affairs of Greece, | 1412 |
| The Revolution in France, | 1413 |
| Supposed influence of Wellington in Polignac's appointment, | 1413 |
| Increasing opposition to the French ministry, | 1414 |
| 1830 Abdication of Charles X., | 1416 |
| Death of George IV., | 1416 |
| PAGE | |
| 1830 Character of the King, | 1418 |
| Effects of the July Revolution, | 1419 |
| Position of Wellington's ministry, | 1420 |
| Danger from O'Connell's agitations, | 1421 |
| And from rick-burning, etc., | 1421 |
| Death of Huskisson, | 1421 |
| Anxiety felt in Parliament, | 1422 |
| Wellington resigns, | 1422 |
| Grey's ministry, | 1423 |
| Difficulties attending reform, | 1423 |
| 1831 The first Reform Bill, | 1425 |
| The second reading, | 1426 |
| Dissolution of Parliament, | 1426 |
| The Bill passes in the Commons, | 1427 |
| The Bill rejected in the Lords, | 1427 |
| Consequent riots in the country, | 1428 |
| Organized action of the political unions, | 1428 |
| Opposition of the King, | 1429 |
| 1832 The second Bill passes second reading in the Lords, | 1429 |
| Preparations during the recess, | 1429 |
| The Bill again rejected in the Lords, | 1430 |
| The ministers resign, | 1430 |
| They return to office, | 1430 |
| The Reform Bill passes, | 1430 |
| Description of the Bill, | 1430 |
| Importance of the change, | 1432 |
| Anxiety as to the effect of the change, | 1433 |
| 1833 Character of the reformed Parliament, | 1434 |
| Critical questions to be settled, | 1434 |
| Condition of Ireland, | 1434 |
| Position of the Irish Church, | 1435 |
| Irish Tithe Composition Bill passed, | 1436 |
| Althorp's Irish Church Bill, | 1436 |
| The Coercion Bill, | 1438 |
| Changes in the ministry, | 1439 |
| Weakness of the ministry, | 1440 |
| Renewal of the Bank charter, | 1441 |
| Settlement of the East India Company, | 1442 |
| Emancipation of the Slaves, | 1442 |
| Condition of trade in the West Indies, | 1443 |
| 1831 Opposition of planters to the orders in Council, | 1444 |
| 1833 The Bill passed, | 1445 |
| 1834 Weakness of the ministry shown in Parliament, | 1445 |
| Split in the Cabinet on Ward's motion on the Irish Church, | 1446 |
| Resignation of Stanley, Graham, Richmond, and Ripon, | 1447 |
| Difficulties of Grey's position, | 1447 |
| Grey resigns. Lord Melbourne's ministry, | 1449 |
| His Church policy, | 1450 |
| Reform of the Poor Law, | 1451 |
| Discontent and misery of the poor, | 1453 |
| Increase of trades unions, | 1454 |
| Dispute between Brougham and Durham, | 1455 |
| Dismissal of the Melbourne ministry, | 1455 |
| Peel's ministry, | 1456 |
| 1835 The Tamworth Manifesto, | 1456 |
| Irish appropriation clause again introduced, | 1457 |
| Peel resigns. Melbourne's ministry reconstituted, | 1457 |
| Condition of municipal corporations, | 1459 |
| The Municipal Reform Bill, | 1460 |
| Foreign diplomacy of Palmerston, | 1461 |
| 1831 Absorption of Poland, | 1461 |
| Formation of Belgium, | 1462 |
| Affairs of Portugal, | 1463 |
| 1832 Affairs of Spain, | 1463 |
| 1834 The Quadruple Alliance, | 1464 |
| Retrospect of affairs in India, | 1465 |
| 1805 Cornwallis Governor-General, | 1466 |
| Sir George Barlow, | 1466 |
| 1807 Lord Minto, | 1466 |
| 1813 Marquis of Hastings, | 1467 |
| 1814 War with Nepaul, | 1467 |
| 1815 War with the Pindaries and Mahrattas, | 1468 |
| 1823 Lord Amherst, | 1471 |
| War with Burmah, | 1471 |
| 1826 Capture of Bhurtpore, | 1472 |
| 1. COUNTRIES TO THE NORTH OF FRANCE, | At end of Book. |
| 2. NORTH AMERICA, | " " |
| 3. SPAIN, | " " |
| 4. PORTUGAL, | " " |
| 5. EUROPE, | " " |
| 6. INDIA, | " " |
| 7. ENGLISH POSSESSIONS IN INDIA, | " " |
1689-1702.
CONTEMPORARY PRINCES.
| France. | Austria. | Spain. | Prussia. | Russia. |
| Louis XIV., 1643. | Leopold I., 1658. | Charles II., 1665. | Frederick I., 1701. | Peter the Great, 1689. |
| Philip V., 1700. |
| Denmark and Norway. | Sweden. |
| Christian V., 1670. | Charles XI., 1660. |
| Frederick IV., 1699. | Charles XII., 1697. |
| POPES.— | Alexander VIII., 1689. | Innocent XII., 1691. | Clement XI., 1700. |
|---|
| Archbishops. | Chancellors. |
| William Sancroft, 1678. | (In Commission, 1689.) |
| John Tillotson, 1691. | Sir John Somers, 1693. |
| Thomas Tenison, 1694. | Sir Nathan Wright, 1700. |
| First Lord of the Treasury. | Chancellor of the Exchequer. |
| 1689. Mordaunt. | 1689. Delamere. |
| 1690. Lowther. | 1690. Hampden. |
| 1690. Godolphin. | 1694. Montague. |
| 1697. Montague. | 1699. Aaron Smith. |
| 1699. Tankerville. | 1701. Henry Boyle. |
| 1700. Godolphin. | |
| 1702. Carlisle. |
Secretaries of State.
| 1689 { Nottingham | 1697 { Shrewsbury |
| { Shrewsbury | { Vernon |
| 1690 { Nottingham | 1699 { Jersey |
| { Sidney | { Vernon |
| 1693 { Shrewsbury | 1700 { Hedges |
| { Trenchard | { Vernon |
| 1695 { Shrewsbury | 1702 { Manchester |
| { Trumbal | { Vernon |
Before the Crown was absolutely offered to William, the Convention was eager to reform a number of the most prominent abuses of the last reign. It was shown by the wiser leaders among them that such reforms would entail a mass of legislation which, The Declaration of Right. to be done well, must occupy several years. It was therefore determined that, for the present, a solemn declaration of principles only should be drawn up. This is known as the Declaration of Right. In it, after enumerating the evils from which the country had suffered, the Lords and Commons declared that the dispensing power does not exist, that without grant or consent of Parliament no money can be exacted by the sovereign, and no army kept up in time of peace. They also affirmed the right of petition, the right of free choice of representatives, the right of Parliament Crown accepted by William and Mary. to freedom of debate, the right of the nation to a pure administration of justice, and the necessity, in order to secure these things, of frequent Parliaments. This Declaration having been read to William and Mary, the Crown was solemnly offered them by Halifax, and by them accepted. They were immediately proclaimed amid general plaudits.
Thus was consummated, with scarcely any bloodshed, and by what Character of the Revolution. appeared an almost unanimous action on the part of the nation, a complete revolution. It was not the less a revolution because it was held that the whole Constitution of England passed on in its minutest detail unchanged. By it was overthrown for ever the theory which came into existence under the Tudors, and was brought to perfection under the Stuarts; henceforward it was impossible that the King should be regarded either as the proprietor of the country, or as a ruler by divine right, the representative of God upon earth. In the place of this theory was substituted that great Whig theory, which, arising among the Puritans, had enjoyed a brief triumph in the successes of the Great Rebellion, and, violently overthrown at the Restoration, had succeeded in making good its position during the reigns of the two last Stuarts,—the theory which regarded the King as reigning by the will of the people and in virtue of an implied contract with them. As a natural consequence of the position thus taken by the nation as the supreme power in the State, Parliament, its representative, became in its turn supreme, and although the change was not yet fully understood, the representatives of the people were gradually taking to themselves not only the duties of legislation, but also the executive. The ministry, therefore, however much they may have been still regarded as the King's ministers, became by degrees the national ministers, answerable for their conduct in Parliament, and before long became in fact little else than the executive Committee of the majority in Parliament.
The unanimity of parties which had secured the triumph of William Personal unpopularity of William. was of short duration, nor was his personal popularity long-lived. The apparent coldness of his demeanour, his carelessness of the pomps of the Court, his wretched health, which obliged him to withdraw from London and establish his Court at Kensington, speedily rendered him personally unpopular; while, as soon as the general danger which had caused their union was removed, the fundamental differences which divided political parties at once made themselves obvious. Moreover, the tendency to reaction, visible after all political excitements, began to show itself. Two classes were by no means ready to accept kindly the revolution which had been wrought. These were the clergy Discontent of the clergy and the army. The greater part of the clergy had spent their lives in inculcating the duty of passive obedience. Although that theory had broken down in practice when the attacks of the Crown were directed against themselves, they could not bring themselves to submit without difficulty to a complete reversal of their political creed, nor could they help seeing that the success of William implied nothing short of the substitution of the Whig doctrine for that of monarchy by divine right. A very large portion of them were therefore disaffected. The and the army. army, though it had disliked the introduction of Catholics and of Irish among its ranks, and was not prejudiced in favour of any theory of monarchy, felt its professional honour injured by the sorry part it had played in the late events. So deep was the disaffection that one regiment quartered at Ipswich broke out into open mutiny, marched northward in arms, and was only brought to obedience after a skirmish with some Dutch troops under Ginkel, which had been rapidly sent in pursuit. The signs of general disaffection at the same time were so obvious that it was thought necessary to suspend the Habeas Corpus Act.
Before this happened, William had had to form a ministry and to furnish himself with a Parliament. For this latter purpose, in spite of the opposition of many of the old Tories, who regarded a Parliament not summoned by the King's writ as no Parliament at all, the Convention was changed into a Parliament, and proceeded to act in that capacity. It was not indeed reasonable that a freely elected body, whose choice of a king both sides were willing to allow, should still be regarded upon technical grounds as incapable of settling matters of much less importance. The choice of ministers was a matter of more difficulty.