[545] Od. iv. 753.
[546] Il. xvi. 438.
[547] Il. xvi. 436.
[548] Il. xviii. 464.
[549] Il. xxiv. 49.
[550] Cf. Il. iii. 182, μοιρηγενές.
[551] Od. xxii. 54.
[552] Il. xx. 30.
[553] Il. xxi. 517.
[554] Æsch. Ag. 993.
[555] Herod. i. 91.
[556] Enumerated in Nägelsbach, iii. 7–9.
[557] Od. i. 20, 45, 77. xxiv. 479.
[558] Od. v. 445. 451.
[559] Il. xxi. 308.
[560] Il. xxiii. 144.
[561] Miscellaneous Sonnets, Part II. No. xxix.
[562] Ibid. Part I. No. xxxiii:
[563] Il. xx. 7–9.
[564] Smith’s Dict. art. Harpyiæ. On the same subject, see Nägelsbach Hom. Theol. ii. 12. Friedreich, Realien, p. 667. Crusius on Od. xx. 77; and Voss as there quoted, whose opinion is, I think, quite erroneous.
[565] Il. xvi. 150. xix. 400.
[566] Od. i. 241. xiv. 371.
[567] Friedreich, Realien, (p. 677.) §. 198.
[568] Ibid. (p. 220.) §. 61.
[569] Smith’s Dict. art. Eumenides.
[570] From δα and πλήσσω: Liddell and Scott: also Schol. H. in loc. Or, μεγάλως ἐμπελάζουσα, Schol. V. The meaning may be close-nearing, with formidable inward action.
[571] De Præcepto et Dispensatione, sect. 8.
[572] Od. xx. 70.
[573] Il. xix. 85, 6.
[574] Il. v. 832–4.
[575] Il. ix. 569–72.
[576] Il. xix. 87.
[577] Soph. Œd. Rex, 866.
[578] Il. ix. 598.
[580] Il. xx. 233.
[581] Od. xv. 250.
[582] Od. v. 120.
[583] Od. v. 333, 461.
[584] Od. xi. 601.
[585] I have alluded elsewhere (sect. ii. p. 169) to another possible explanation: two aspects of character may be exhibited in the two images.
[586] ad Odyss. xi. 601–4.
[587] Od. iv. 561.
[588] Od. viii. 467.
[589] Od. ix. 65.
[590] Od. xi. 26.
[591] Od. xi. 29.
[592] Od. xi. 153, 230.
[593] Od. ix. 115.
[594] Od. x. 105–15.
[595] Od. viii. 102. 246.
[596] Ibid. 378–88.
[597] Lit. Greece, vol. i. p. 510.
[598] Od. x. 2, 21, 11.
[599] Nägelsbach, Hom. Theol. II. 12, holds the opposite opinion.
[600] Il. i. 606–8.
[601] Il. vii. 445.
[602] Il. xxiv. 33.
[603] Il. i. 571.
[604] Il. viii. 2. and xx. 4.
[605] Il. xx. 4.
[606] Od. ii. 69.
[607] Il. viii. 10.
[608] Il. xxiv. 111.
[609] Il. iv. 43.
[610] Il. xiv. 159–61.
[611] Il. xvi. 646–55.
[612] Od. iii. 69.
[613] Il. vi. 174.
[614] Od. v. 91–6.
[615] Od. v. 169, 70.
[616] Il. xix. 386.
[617] Il. xx. 105.
[618] Od. vii. 201–3.
[619] Nägelsbach carries it even to this point. Hom. Theol. Abschn. II. 17.
[620] Il. viii. 39. xxi. 509.
[621] Il. v. 428.
[622] Ibid. 370.
[623] Il. xxi. 504.
[624] Il. i. 568.
[625] Il. viii. 457.
[626] Il. i. 501.
[627] Il. xxi. 499.
[628] Ibid. 468.
[629] Il. i. 573–6.
[630] Od. i. 22.
[631] Il. i. 423.
[632] Od. xi. 602.
[633] Il. xx. 234.
[634] Il. xxiv. 525.
[635] Pastor Fido.
[636] Il. ii. 514.
[637] Rom. i. 32.
[638] Od. v. 118–29.
[639] Il. i. 599.
[640] Il. ii. 270–7.
[641] Od. xvii. 465.
[642] Heyne on Il. i. 603.
[643] Il. x. 765. 6.
[644] Fragm. 50. ap. Plut. ii. 415 C.
[645] Od. v. 169, 70.
[646] Od. v. 213, 218.
[647] Il. v. 388.
[648] Il. v. 898.
[649] Od. x. 396, 490–5, 529.
[650] Od. xi. 7.
[651] Od. xii. 25, 37 et seqq.
[652] Od. iv. 475 and 561.
[653] Il. iii. 386.
[654] Il. xiii. 521.
[655] Il. xviii. 165–8.
[656] See sup. sect. iii. p. 201.
[657] Il. v. 331.
[658] Il. iii. 418–20.
[659] Il. xiv. 198, 9.
[660] Il. ii. 478, 9.
[661] Od. v. 378.
[662] Friedreich, Realien 187. p. 599.
[663] Il. ii. 1–4, and i. 609–11.
[664] Il. v. 416, 900–4.
[665] Il. xxiv. 69.
[666] Od. v. 100–2.
[667] Il. xviii. 166–8.
[668] Il. x. 515.
[669] Il. v. 711, and xiv. 157.
[670] Il. xiii. 13.
[671] Il. i. 521–7.
[672] Od. v. 50–57.
[673] Il. xiii. 29.
[674] Il. v. 770.
[675] Il. xiii. 20.
[676] Il. viii. 41–6.
[677] Il. xiv. 226.
[678] Il. v. 864, 355–67.
[679] Il. xv. 79–84.
[680] Il. i. 44–8.
[681] Od. viii. 361–3.
[682] Il. i. 590–3.
[683] Il. i. 596–604.
[684] Il. xv. 87.
[685] Il. xxiii. 300.
[686] Il. xxi. 407. iv. 443. v. 744. ii. 448. v. 837.
[687] Il. v. 437. xvi. 774. xv. 361.
[688] Il. v. 860. xiv. 148.
[689] Od. viii. 310.
[690] Od. v. 212.
[691] Il. xiv. 158.
[692] Il. xxiv. 130.
[693] Il. iv. 49. xxiv. 70. xxii. 170.
[694] Od. xix. 395–8.
[695] Il. ix. Od. i. iv.
[696] Il. viii. 218. ix. 254.
[697] Il. v. 198.
[698] Il. xv. 246.
[699] Il. v. 128.
[700] Il. v. 183.
[701] Il. iii. 396.
[702] Ibid. 838.
[703] Mure, however, in his History of Greek Literature, refers the origin of the metaphor to the practice of representation by statues.
[704] Il. v. 777. xiv. 347.
[705] Nägelsbach, i. 10. p. 25.
[706] Od. xvi. 196.
[707] Il. xvi. 459.
[708] Od. xii. 290.
[709] Il. xvii. 98–101.
[710] Od. iii. 26.
[711] Od. xix. 478.
[712] Il. v. 488.
[713] Od. xiii. 291.
[714] De Civ. Dei, iii. 2.
[715] 1 Kings xviii. 27.
[716] John ii. 24, 25.
[717] Il. xxiii. 194.
[718] Ibid. 144.
[719] Il. xxiv. 788–800.
[720] Od. xviii. 37.
[721] Od. x. 306.
[722] Od. iv. 379, 468.
[723] Ibid. 237.
[724] Od. xxiii. 11. This is fully set forth in Nägelsbach, i. 33, p. 54 et seqq.
[725] Od. xiv. 348, 57.
[726] Nägelsbach, Hom. Theol. on the case of Autolycus.
[727] Döllinger, Heid. u. Jud. v. i. p. 255. Plato Legg. i. p. 636.
[728] Vid. Il. iv. 48. xxii. 170. xxiv. 69. and 33.