The foregoing completes the steps or documents necessary for the original registration of a vessel.
It will be observed that no reference has been made to a bill of sale. This is because no such bill is required by law to be produced at the first registration. In fact the only bill of sale recognized by statute is a bill which itself contains a copy of the ship's document, and therefore such a bill could not be produced before the registration had actually taken place. All that is required in the first instance, therefore, is the Carpenter's Certificate with the affidavits as to ownership, etc. These documents are taken as establishing the ownership, and laying the foundation for registry in a particular name. However, the bill of sale may be actually in existence, having been given either by the builder himself or by some one who had subsequently acquired title to the vessel before her documentation. In such case the bill of sale should be produced to complete the chain of title, and will be retained at the Custom House with the Carpenter's Certificate as a link in the chain. But it will not be recorded, for the law makes no provision for the recording of bills of sale except in the sense of transfers of documented vessels, as hereafter referred to.
The foregoing summarizes the steps to be followed in the case of an original registration. But on every change in the status of the vessel a new registry must be secured, and the vessel must be documented anew. This is the case where a vessel is sold in whole or in part to a citizen of the United States, or where it is altered in whole or in part, by being rebuilt or lengthened or built upon, or is changed from one classification or denomination to another, by alteration in its mode or method of rigging or fitting. It also applies to the case of a change of name as hereafter referred to, and, in case of corporations, to the death of the officer in whose name vessel is documented.
It should be borne in mind that the penalty for failure to effect such a new registration is the severe one that the vessel shall cease to be considered a vessel of the United States. No time limit for the accruing of this penalty, however, has been fixed by law.
In case of such new registration the process is the same as above outlined, but omitting the earlier steps relative to the measurement and marking of vessel, official number, etc., all of which are certified to by the previous document.
In the case of the sale of the vessel, it is of course the bill of sale that furnishes the foundation for the transaction, which must be accompanied by the owner's and master's oaths as already outlined.
The bill of sale, as the all-important and indispensable document, must be made to comply strictly with the requirements covering registry, the most important of which is that it will recite at length the last previous certificate issued to the vessel. This proviso is of great importance in England. The inaccurate recital of such a certificate voids the sale entirely. In the United States the penalty is not so severe, but still severe enough, as the ship is deprived of her American character.
The bill of sale when produced is recorded in the office of the Collector of Customs in accordance with the law hereinafter referred to, and is returned to the owner producing it, as in the case of any other bill of sale which the owner may desire to have recorded.
It frequently happens that it becomes necessary to secure new documents for a vessel which is distant from the port where her new owners reside, and where it is desired that she shall be documented. In such case it is often impractical at the time to secure the outstanding papers for surrender. The practice is to secure certified copies of the same either from the office of the Collector where they were issued or from the office of the Commissioner of Navigation at Washington, giving the necessary oath for the production of the original documents when they come to hand.
It also frequently happens that the certified copies, or indeed sometimes the original documents themselves, do not bear upon their face, as they should, a notation as to the date of expiration of the certificate of inspection of the vessel. In this case some evidence of an outstanding inspection must be produced to the Collector. The simplest plan is to secure, by wire if necessary, a statement from the appropriate Collector of Customs that such an inspection is outstanding.
The law is very strict on the surrender of the old documents upon the issuing of new ones, as also in those cases where a ship loses her right to continue as a vessel of the United States. The old law, passed in 1792, provided for the giving of a bond by the ship's husband or the acting or managing owner, varying in amount according to the tonnage of the boat from $400 to $2,000, guaranteeing that the registry should be used only for the vessel for which it was granted, and should not be sold, lent or otherwise disposed of, and that in case the vessel were lost or taken by an enemy or otherwise prevented from returning to the port, the certificate, if preserved, should be delivered up within eight days of her return to port, etc. The present law substitutes for this bond a penalty of $500 and declares the Certificate of Registry to be void after a violation of any of the requirements as to its surrender.
It frequently happens that a document is lost or wrongfully withheld from the possession of the owner. In this case, upon the oath of the master or other person having charge of the vessel, a new document may be issued either temporary in form, if the vessel is out of her own port, or permanent, if she is in her own port.
The present law on the subject of recording bills of sale is included in the general mortgage provisions of the new Merchant Marine Act, under which it is provided that no sale of a vessel shall be valid against a ship unless the bill of sale is recorded by the Collector of Customs in an official register, which is required to show
(1) The name of the vessel;
(2) The names of the parties to the sale;
(3) The time and date of receiving the bill of sale; and
(4) The interest in the vessel so sold.
It is also provided that no bill of sale can be recorded unless the interest of the grantor in the vessel is stated, also the interest sold, nor unless the bill has been acknowledged before a notary public or other officer authorized to take acknowledgements. In the case of a change in the port of documentation, no bill of sale may be recorded at the new port unless a certified copy of the record of the vessel at the former port is furnished by the collector of that port.
The law in regard to ship mortgages is highly technical and reference only will be made here to the general provisions of the Merchant Marine Act which makes far-reaching changes in the existing system in an effort to give added value to mortgage security on a ship, a form of security which heretofore has been of very limited value on account of the subordination of the mortgage, which is not a maritime contract, to all maritime liens, whether arising out of contract or tort.
The present law gives to a duly recorded preferred mortgage priority except as to (1) liens arising prior to the recording of a mortgage in strict conformity to the provisions of the act; (2) liens for damages arising out of tort; (3) liens for wages of stevedores when employed directly by the owner, operator, master, ship's husband or agent of the vessel; (4) liens for wages of the crew of the vessel; (5) liens for general average; (6) liens for salvage, including contract salvage; and (7) court costs and expenses.
If a mortgage covers a ship of over 200 gross tons the material facts regarding it must be endorsed on the ship's papers. There must also be filed an affidavit that the mortgage was made in good faith, without the intent to delay or defraud. It must appear that the mortgagee is a citizen of the United States and that the mortgage does not stipulate that the mortgagee waives its preferred status. If the mortgage includes property other than a vessel it must provide for the separate discharge of such property by the payment of a specified amount, and if it includes more than one vessel it must similarly provide for the separate discharge of each vessel on the payment of a specified amount, in default of which, the court, in a suit on the mortgage, is to determine the proportionate charge.
Two certified copies of every preferred mortgage are to be delivered by the collector to the mortgagor, who is required to use due diligence to retain one copy on board the vessel, and to cause it and the ship's documents to be exhibited by the master to any person having business with the vessel which may give rise to a maritime lien or to the sale of the vessel. Upon request, the master is required to exhibit to such person the ship's documents and this copy of the mortgage. Upon request of the mortgagee, the mortgagor is required to disclose in writing, before the execution of any preferred mortgage, the existence of any maritime lien prior to the mortgage, that is known to the mortgagor, and, without the consent of the mortgagee, the mortgagor is forbidden, after the execution of the mortgage and before the mortgagee has had reasonable time to record the mortgage and have the necessary endorsements made, to incur any obligations creating liens on the vessel other than those for wages, for general average or for salvage.
The law permits the preferred mortgage to bear any rate of interest agreed to by the parties. It provides severe penalties upon the master for failing to exhibit the ship's documents or the copy of the mortgage, when demanded, and permits local inspectors to suspend or cancel the master's license for any such violation. As to the mortgagor who fails to make disclosure of liens already referred to, or who incurs new liens with attempt to defraud, the law provides a maximum fine of $1,000 and imprisonment for two years, and makes the mortgage then immediately payable. It also subjects the collectors of customs and the mortgagor to personal liability for loss occasioned by their failure to perform their duties under the act and opens the federal courts to such suits.
Under the same act jurisdiction of all suits to foreclose a preferred mortgage is vested exclusively in the District Courts of the United States. Authority is also given to bring suit in personam in the admiralty, in the United States District Courts, against the mortgagor.
The surrender of the documents of mortgaged vessels without the approval of the Shipping Board is prohibited, and the Board is directed to withhold such approval unless the mortgagee consents to the surrender. By resolution of the Board this law is interpreted as not applying to cases in which owners merely renew licenses or change documents incident to change of trade and where the ownership remains the same.
Elaborate provisions are also to be found covering the formal procedure in case of sales of mortgaged vessels, together with a provision that no rights under a mortgage shall be assigned to any person not a citizen of the United States without the approval of the Board, and that no vessel shall be sold in a suit in the admiralty to any person who is not a citizen.
The legality of the provisions conferring upon the federal courts the right to enforce mortgage liens which are of a nonmaritime character, is much debated and must await final decision by the Supreme Court. If the court should decide against the legality of these provisions serious and difficult questions will be presented as to whether the act as it now stands will be effective to give preferred status to such a mortgage, under the radically different procedure which must then be resorted to.
The act also revises the law on the subject of the creation of maritime liens for necessaries. It provides that persons furnishing repairs, supplies, towage, etc., on order of the owner or an authorized agent shall have a maritime lien on the vessel without being required to prove the credit was given to the vessel; defines the persons who are to be presumed to have authority from the owner to procure repairs, etc., including the agents of a charterer; and permits the waiving of such liens by those furnishing the supplies or services, subject to certain existing specified rules of law.
The American law has always been very strict in regard to changing the names of vessels. Such change can only be made by the Commissioner of Navigation, and if made by the master or owner or agent of the vessel subjects the vessel to forfeiture. Since 1881 the Secretary of the Treasury, and later, the Commissioner of Navigation, has been authorized to permit the change of names of vessels "duly enrolled and found seaworthy and free from debt." Under this law it became necessary to secure a special act of Congress, which was frequently done, to change the name of a mortgaged vessel. To cure this defect the law of February 19, 1920, which took effect thirty days after its passage, provides for a change of name by the Commissioner of Navigation upon compliance with regulations issued by him.
All that is required in the first instance is a duplicate application by the owner, addressed to the Commissioner of Navigation and forwarded to him through the Collector of Customs at the home port of the vessel, which is required to state the change desired, the reasons in support of it, place of build, official number, rig, gross tonnage, and the owner's name. It must also include a detailed list of liens of record from all custom houses where the vessel has been previously documented, together with the consent in writing of the mortgagee or other beneficiary under each lien to the change desired. To this the Collector of Customs, forwarding the application, must add his certificate as to liens on record in his office, and must also state the date and place of last inspection, a requirement which presupposes the presentation to him of satisfactory evidence of the vessel's inspection, that is, either the original certificate, or a certified copy of it, or a statement from the office of the Commissioner of Navigation at Washington that such a certificate is outstanding. In the case of vessels not usually inspected, as, for instance, barges, inspectors are authorized to make special examinations at the owner's expense and to furnish a certificate of the seaworthiness of the vessel, the object of course being to prevent old and unseaworthy vessels from concealing their condition and antiquity by a change of name.
After the application has been passed by the Commissioner and permission has been granted, it is required that the change shall be published in a daily or weekly paper nearest to the port of documentation in at least four consecutive issues, the cost of procuring the evidence and of publication to be paid by the applicant. The permission for change is not effective until this fee is paid. Upon its payment the issuance of a new document is then required, which presupposes the production, as in other cases, of the owner's affidavit, and of the master's affidavit, as already explained.
The Collector thereupon records the change of name in his prescribed reports and the transaction is completed.
Vessels formerly documented and which have been sold to the United States and resold to citizens, must be documented under the old name and official number, but vessels never before documented and sold by the United States to citizens, may be redocumented under any name selected that is approved by the commissioner.
In forwarding the application for change of name the Collector of Customs is required to submit his recommendations giving any reasons for or against the change. The usual reasons in support of a change are a desire on the part of the company to carry out some established policy in the naming of its vessels, or a desire to shorten or lengthen a name, as the case may be.
The fee required is prescribed by law upon a sliding scale from $10 to $100, according to gross tonnage, the former figure being for vessels of 99 gross tons and under, and the latter for vessels of 5,000 gross tons and over.
Whether or not a vessel is required to enter and clear depends, first, upon whether she is registered, and second, upon her tonnage and the service in which she is engaged.
All vessels under registry (as distinguished from vessels enrolled or licensed) are required to enter and clear at every port, except when bound from a point in one state to that of an adjoining state.
If not registered the question depends in the first instance upon the size of the vessel. The law, as inherited from the early days, when smuggling was frequent in small vessels, and it was considered important to keep them under close supervision, makes a distinction between vessels under twenty tons and those above that tonnage.
If under 20 tons (and properly documented, that is licensed) and laden wholly with American goods, or with foreign goods in packages as imported not exceeding $400 in value, or of aggregate value not over $800, they may trade from a customs district in one state to a customs district in the same or an adjoining state, without entering or clearing. But if over twenty tons, such vessels are permitted to trade, without entering or clearing, from one customs district in the same Great District to another in the same Great District, or from a State in one Great District to an adjoining State in another Great District: Except as thus provided all vessels engaged in the coasting trade must enter and clear on their arrival at, or departure from, each port.
The five Great Districts referred to have been defined as follows and should not be confused with the customs collection districts:—
1. Atlantic coast from Canada to Mexico.
2. Porto Rico.
3. Pacific Coast.
4. Alaska.
5. Hawaii.
It is worth noting, however, that enrolled vessels which are not required to enter and clear may do so, if they desire for any purpose to have a record of their entrance and their clearance. This might occur in the case of a vessel intending to undergo extensive repairs and which might desire such a record to secure a rebate of insurance premium.
In the case of vessels in the foreign trade or coming from one Great District into another, and which are required to be registered, the law requires the surrender and filing of manifests, bill of health and crew list. When these formalities have been complied with, the vessel is posted in the Custom House as entered. The manifest is produced to the boarding officer and includes the original manifest issued at the foreign port as well as a certified copy. The crew list is the list issued by the Collector of the last port of clearance from the United States, the Collector having retained the original sworn to by the master, and having furnished the master with a certified copy. Bills of health should have been secured from the American consular office at the last port of touch, but bills are not required from ports where there is no such officer. The ship's register is deposited in the Custom House and obtained before clearance.
In the case of the clearance of a vessel in the coastwise trade, and which is under registry, or which for any other reason desires a clearance, the master is required to produce a coasting manifest to the Collector. Upon making affidavit to this document the necessary coastwise clearance and permit is issued. If, however, as in the case of tugs, there is no cargo to be manifested, a coastwise permit is issued upon affidavit by the master that the vessel contains no cargo whatever other than sea stores.
In the case of vessels bound to foreign ports the documents take the form of the customary foreign manifest, which is followed by the official clearance in the form familiar to the export trade for a hundred years.
Shipping articles are required in both the foreign and in the coastwise trade, but with certain important differences.
In the foreign trade the articles, which must be in government form, are required to be signed before a Shipping Commissioner. This, however, does not apply to trade between the United States and the British North American possessions and the West Indies, and Mexico. The nature of these articles is sufficiently familiar to require no comment. Generally speaking the articles must contain the following particulars:—
1. The nature and, as far as practicable, the duration of the intended voyage or engagement, and the port or country at which the voyage is to be terminated.
2. The number and description of the crew, specifying their respective employments.
3. The time at which each seaman is to be on board to begin work.
4. The capacity in which each seaman is to serve.
5. The amount of wages which each seaman is to receive.
6. A scale of the provisions which are to be furnished each seaman.
7. Any regulations as to conduct on board and as to fines, short allowances of provisions, or other lawful punishments for misconduct, which may be sanctioned by Congress or authorized by the Secretary of Commerce, not contrary to or not otherwise provided for by law, which the parties agree to adopt.
8. Any stipulations in reference to allotment of wages or other matters not contrary to law. In 1898 this provision was repealed so far as it relates to allotments in trade between the United States, Dominion of Canada, Newfoundland, the West Indies and Mexico, and the coasting trade of the United States, except between Atlantic and Pacific ports.
In the coasting trade the law merely requires that every master of a vessel of fifty tons or over, bound from a port in one State to a port in any other than a port in an adjoining State (with the exception of voyages from the Atlantic to Pacific ports, which are included under foreign trade) shall make an agreement in writing with his seamen declaring the voyage or term of time for which the seaman is shipped. This agreement may be signed before a Shipping Commissioner, but this is not compulsory. The agreement required in the coasting trade requires only the voyage, or term of time for which the seaman is shipped.
Question has been raised as to whether the requirement as to written articles applies to cases where the "adjoining State" is reached by a waterway running through other States, as, for instance, a voyage from New York to Philadelphia. It seems clear, however, that the law should be strictly interpreted, according to its terms, and that articles would not be required on such a voyage.
In neither case does the law provide a limit in the matter of length of voyage. In England shipping articles are frequently for long periods of a year or more. Our practice is more limited. Clauses for one or more continuous voyages are commonly found with a provision for the termination of the contract by authority of the master, or any member of the crew, upon twenty-four hours' notice.
A provision of law which sometimes occasions difficulty is that which permits a seaman discharged "without fault on his part justifying such discharge" and without his consent, before the commencement of the voyage or before one month's wages are earned, to receive a compensation of one month's wages. This question, like all other questions relating to wages, comes up in the first instance before a Shipping Commissioner, and in the hands of a competent commissioner there should seldom be any difficulty in determining whether the discharge was or was not due to the fault of the seaman or to his inability properly to perform his duties.
The right to overtime is not provided for by statute, and before the war was not generally recognized. In July, 1919, however, an informal agreement was made between the Shipping Board and the steamship association and the unions, under which this right to claim overtime is recognized, provided it is covered by special contract.
The law requires that masters, chief mates, second and third mates, if in charge of a watch, engineers, and pilots of all steam vessels, and the masters of sailing vessels of over 700 gross tons, and of other vessels over 100 gross tons carrying passengers for hire, shall be licensed and classified by the boards of local inspectors, and imposes a penalty of $100 for employing an unlicensed officer or for an unlicensed person to serve as an officer. These several boards of inspectors are under the direction of a Supervising Inspector General appointed by the President, and who is at the head of a Steamboat Inspection Service, and are further under the supervision of ten supervising inspectors, to each of whom is assigned general supervision of the work of inspection in a particular district. The law imposes large discretion upon the local inspectors in the examination and licensing of officers, limiting the licenses to a period of five years, and giving the inspectors authority to suspend licenses on proof of bad conduct, intemperate habits, incapacity, inattention to duties or a willful violation of inspection laws.
It is specially forbidden for any state or municipal government to impose on pilots any obligation to secure a license in addition to that issued by the Federal government.
One of the most important functions of the local inspectors is that which concerns the investigation of collisions and complaints of incompetency or misconduct committed by licensed officers. For this purpose the inspectors have power to summon the witnesses, to administer oaths and, upon hearing had after reasonable notice in writing to the alleged delinquent, to suspend or to revoke his license, if satisfied that he has been guilty of misbehavior, negligence or unskillfulness, or has endangered life. Appeals from the decision of the local inspectors may be made to the supervising inspector.
Where, however, the supervising or local inspector finds a licensed officer on board a vessel under the influence of liquor to such an extent as to unfit him for duty, or when a licensed officer uses abusive language to an officer or insults him while on duty, the local inspector is required to revoke the license of the offending officer without further trial or investigation.
The rules of the board classify vessels according to the general character of their trade, as
1. Ocean and coastwise.
2. Lakes, bays and sounds.
3. Rivers.
Qualifications for the officers properly vary according to these three classes of service, to which is added a number of other special classifications, as, for instance, ferry steamers on rivers, passenger barges on rivers, etc.; or in the case of engineers, as, for instance, condensing river steamer and noncondensing river steamer. These requirements are set forth in full detail in the Regulations of the Steamboat Inspection Service, with which all officers should be familiar.
Certain minimum requirements in the case of deck officers have been prescribed by statute, the latest law being that of March 11, 1918, which with certain minor exceptions, provides for one licensed master for every vessel; for vessels 1,000 gross tons or over, three licensed mates, and for vessels between 200 and 1,000 tons, two licensed mates; for vessels between 100 and 200 tons, one licensed mate. The inspectors, however, are permitted to increase these requirements if they consider the vessel not sufficiently manned for safe navigation.
The same law of 1918 prohibits officers from assuming deck watches on leaving port unless they have had at least six hours off duty within the twelve hours preceding sailing; and also prohibits licensed officers on both ocean and coastwise vessels from doing duty exceeding nine hours of any twenty-four while in port, or more than twelve hours of any twenty-four while at sea, except in case of emergency endangering life or property.
Before the passage of the Seamen's Act in 1915, there were no statutory requirements as to the ability or experience of the crew, other than the general requirement that the vessel should be properly manned. This act, however, presents a body of highly stringent requirements. Its principal requirements may be summarized as follows:
In the matter of age the act provides that in the deck department of all vessels of more than 100 tons gross, except those navigating rivers exclusively and the smaller inland lakes, there shall be a certain proportion of seamen with the rating of able seamen, a classification which is limited to those of nineteen years of age. The lack of supply of able seamen has made it practically impossible to enforce this requirement.
The act requires the physical examination of able seamen in the deck department. It also divides able seamen into two classes, those engaged in vessels operating on the high seas and those engaged on the Great Lakes, smaller lakes, bays and sounds. For the former three years' service at sea or on the Great Lakes, etc., and an examination as to general physical condition, is required, or one year's experience on deck at sea or on the Great Lakes, etc., together with an oral examination on seamanship and for the latter eighteen months' experience at sea or on the Lakes.
The Seamen's Act, in connection with its elaborate provisions for the equipment of vessels with life-saving appliances, lays down the distribution of a specially designated class of certificated seamen known as lifeboat men to the various lifeboats and rafts required to be carried by a vessel, leaving the designation of the individuals to the discretion of the master. To secure a certificate as lifeboat man, a seaman is required to prove to the satisfaction of the inspection officers, or other officers designated for the purpose of issuing certificates, that he has been trained in all the operations in connection with launching lifeboats and the use of oars, is acquainted with the practical handling of the boats themselves, and is capable of understanding and answering the orders relative to lifeboat service.
Perhaps the most disputed proviso of the Seamen's Act is that which requires that not less than 75 per cent. of the crew of the vessel must be able to understand any order given by the officer—that is, the necessary orders given to the members of the crew in each department in the performance of their particular duties. This law, however, does not require the use of any particular language on the part of officers and crew of the vessel, nor does it require an English-speaking crew, nor that the members of the crew in one department of the vessel should understand orders given in another department.
Since 1792 our laws have required that the officers of all vessels of the United States who are in charge of a watch, including pilots, shall be citizens. This of course includes tugs, barges and all other vessels which are documented under our laws. The term "officer" includes the Chief Engineer and each Assistant Engineer in charge of the watch. The only exception to this rule is that which was made by the Ship Registry Act of 1914, and the executive order based upon it, under which foreign-built ships admitted to American registry under that act are permitted to retain their watch officers, without regard to citizenship, for a term of seven years, provided that after two years any vacancy must be filled by a citizen of the United States.
There are no provisions or restrictions as to the nationality of the crew on vessels of the United States.
The Seamen's Act requires that on coasting voyages, wages shall be paid to every seaman within two days after the termination of the agreement under which he shipped, or at the time of his discharge if he should be discharged before the expiration of the agreement; and that on foreign voyages wages shall be paid within twenty-four hours after the discharge of the cargo, or within four days after the discharge of the seaman, whichever shall first happen. The law further provides that a seaman is entitled in every case to be paid at the time of his discharge a sum equal to one-third of the balance of wages then due him. This proviso, however, is seldom observed in practice, nor is it insisted upon, as it would in general be impracticable for wages to be paid at the moment of discharge.
The question of payment of a certain portion of wages on demand, which is also covered by the Seamen's Act and earlier acts, has received considerable revision in the Merchant Marine Act. Under this law it is provided that every seaman on a vessel of the United States may receive on demand of the master one-half of the balance of his wages earned at every port where the vessel loads or delivers cargo. This protection may not be waived by contract, but is subject to the proviso that the demand shall not be made before the expiration of, nor oftener than once in, five days, nor more than once in the same harbor. Failure on the part of the master to comply with this demand releases the seaman from his contract and entitles him to full payment of wages earned. At the end of the voyage the seaman is entitled to the remainder of his wages according to the provisions of the Seamen's Act, which also provides that notwithstanding the release, which is required to be signed before the Shipping Commissioner at the time of the seaman's discharge, the proper court may set aside the release upon good cause shown. The provision of the Merchant Marine Act is specially made applicable to the case of seamen on foreign vessels while in the harbors of the United States, and the courts of the United States are opened to such seamen for its enforcement.
The law in regard to advances to seamen is also slightly amended by the Merchant Marine Act, which makes it unlawful to pay wages in advance of the time when actually earned, or to pay such advance wages or make any order or note or other evidence of indebtedness for the same to any other person, or to pay any other person for the shipment of seamen when payment is deducted or is to be deducted from the seaman's wages. Payment of such advance wages or allotment whether made within or without the United States does not absolve the vessel from libel and is no defense to a libel suit. This act also forbids any person to demand or receive from any seaman any remuneration whatever for providing him employment.
Seamen discharged by a consul in a foreign port on account of the voyage being continued contrary to agreement, or unseaworthiness of vessel, or bad provisions, or cruel treatment, are entitled to one month's extra wages and transportation to the United States. Seamen discharged at a foreign port at the request of the master, and not on account of neglect of duty, are entitled to employment on a vessel agreed to by the seaman and to one month's extra wages.
Seamen discharged before commencement of voyage without fault, are entitled to one month's additional wages, and all seamen are entitled to two days' extra wages for each day's delay in payment at end of voyage.
The laws also contain elaborate and beneficial provisions for the recovery of their wages by seamen through proceedings in the courts.
Seamen are disqualified by law from signing away their lien upon a vessel for wages; as also their rights to participate in salvage. It is to be noted that the seaman's right to a share in salvage, in the case of the saving of human life, on the part of a seaman who has taken part in the services rendered, is expressly conferred and protected by statute. Failure, unless unavoidable, to give help to persons at sea, in danger of being lost, is also made a serious criminal offense.
Before the passage of the Seamen's Act there were no legal requirements as to hours of labor at sea, though long established custom had divided the deck crew into two watches and the engine crew into three watches, with certain variations in this plan in special trades. Under the Seamen's Act it is now provided that on merchant vessels of over 100 tons, except those engaged in river and harbor navigation, the sailors must be divided into at least two watches, and the firemen, oilers and water tenders into at least three watches, which are to be kept on duty successively for the performance of ordinary work, incident to the sailing and management of the vessel.
Seamen may not be shipped to work alternately in the fireroom and on deck, nor may those shipped to work on deck be shifted to the fireroom, or vice versa, subject to cases of emergency, in the judgment of the master or other officer. These provisions, however, do not prohibit the master or other officers from requiring the whole or any part of the crew to participate in fire, lifeboat and other drills when the vessel is in a safe harbor nine hours, inclusive of the anchor watch, which is a legal day, but in such case no seaman may be required to do unnecessary work on Sundays or on New Year's, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas, provided that this does not prevent the dispatch of the vessel on regular schedule or when ready to proceed on her voyage.
The Seamen's Act provides that on all vessels (except yachts, pilot boats and vessels of less than 100 tons) whose construction is thereafter begun, there shall be a crew space of not more than 100 cubic feet or not less than 16 square feet for each seaman lodged therein; also that each seaman shall have a separate berth, and that not more than one berth shall be placed above another; that the seamen's quarters shall be properly lighted, drained, heated, ventilated, constructed and protected and shut off; and that crew space shall be kept free from goods and stores. This law increased the crew quarters from 72 cubic feet and 12 square feet in the case of steamships, and from 100 cubic feet in the case of sailing vessels. It is noted that the Seamen's Act applies to all merchant vessels of the United States, in this respect differing from the earlier acts which applied only to seagoing vessels.
The Seamen's Act requires that all merchant vessels whose construction is begun after its passage, having more than ten men on deck, shall have a light, clean and properly ventilated washing place, at least one washing outfit for every two men of the watch, and a separate washing place for the fire-room and engine-room men, if more than ten in number, which shall be large enough to accommodate at least one-sixth of them at the same time, and shall have hot and cold water supply and a sufficient number of wash basins, sinks and shower baths.
Since 1790 the laws of the United States have specified a scale of provisions required to be carried upon vessels. With minor alterations included in the Seamen's Act, the present scale, with permissible substitutions, was fixed by law on December 21, 1898. Under this law seamen have the option of accepting the provisions offered or of demanding the legal scale, which is required to be inserted in all ship articles and to be posted in the galley and forecastle. The laws contain provisos for complaints to be made to the officer in command of the vessel or to the United States consular officer or Shipping Commissioner or chief officer of the customs, who has authority to take action to see that the deficiency is corrected, subject to a penalty for default.
For allowing the supply of provisions to be reduced below the legal scale during the voyage, except for unavoidable causes, compensation must be paid to every seaman according to the time of its continuance and in accordance with the scheduled allowances fixed by law.
In addition to crew space already referred to all merchant vessels which ordinarily make voyages of more than three days' duration and carry a crew of twelve or more seamen, are required to have a separate compartment for hospital purposes with at least one bunk for every twelve seamen, provided that not more than six bunks in all may be required.
Every vessel bound on a voyage over fourteen days in length must, in addition to a slop chest, provide for each seaman one suit of woolen clothing, as also a "safe and warm room" for cold weather.
Prior to the passage of the recent Merchant Marine Act (1920) recovery by a seaman for injuries received by him in the service of the ship was subject to the maritime law under which (except in case of the unseaworthiness of the vessel, where full recovery might be claimed) the seaman was entitled to, but only to, his maintenance and cure, and to wages so long at least as the voyage continued, regardless of his own negligence (unless it amounted to willful misconduct) or of that of any other person. Where his contract extended beyond the voyage or there was fault on the part of the ship, recovery of wages was allowable even beyond the termination of the voyage.
This liability could not be enlarged or diminished by any law of the states on the subject of employer's liability or workmen's compensation.
The Seamen's Act of 1915 undertook to enlarge the protection of seamen by providing that in suits to recover damages for injuries received on board a vessel, or in its service, seamen "having command," e.g., masters, etc., should not be held to be fellow servants with those under their authority, but this was held not to affect those cases covered by the general rule of the maritime law above stated, under which the fellow servant question is immaterial.
A more successful effort at extending the seaman's right, however, was made in the recent Merchant Marine Act, which permits any seaman who suffers injury in the course of his employment, to maintain, at his election, an action for damages at law, with the right of trial by jury, and in such case to have the benefit of the United States statutes modifying or extending the rights of railroad employees in analogous cases.
The same act also covers the question of actions for the death of seamen, giving to their personal representatives the right to sue for damages at law and the benefit of a trial by jury, and the similar benefit of the laws covering actions for death in the case of railroad employees.
This provision, it is observed, is in sharp contrast, and perhaps in some conflict with the provision of an act passed at the same session of Congress, on March 30, 1920, giving a general right to maintain actions for all deaths occurring on the high seas by some wrongful act or neglect. This law, which in its broad terms covers also the case of seamen, permits suits to be brought in the admiralty courts and fixes the recovery at the amount of pecuniary loss sustained by the persons for whose benefit suit is brought. It further provides that in such action the fact that the decedent has been guilty of contributory negligence is not to be considered a bar to recovery, but is to be taken into consideration by the court in fixing the degree of negligence and in reducing the recovery accordingly.
A discussion of the technical questions involved in the relations of these two acts is beyond the scope of this summary.
Offenses by seamen are punishable under the laws of the United States, generally, when committed on the high seas, or on any waters within the jurisdiction of the admiralty courts, or on lands under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States. The list of crimes covers those familiar to the criminal law, such as murder, manslaughter, assault, rape, robbery, arson, larceny, forgery, receiving stolen property, etc. Other offenses peculiar to marine life may be noted as follows.