That this fiction was credited in the days of Elizabeth and James, may be conceded, not only from the familiar allusions of the poets, but from the philosophic writers on the superstitions of the age. To the unborrowed light of the carbuncle, Shakspeare has referred in King Henry the Eighth, where the Princess Elizabeth is prophetically termed,
and in Titus Andronicus, (if that play can be deemed his,) upon the discovery of Bassianus slaughtered in a pit;
He also mentions this "rich jewel" by way of comparison in Coriolanus[397:C]; appropriates it as an ornament to the wheels of Phœbus's chariot in Cymbeline[397:D]; and in the Player's speech in Hamlet, the eyes of Pyrrhus are said to be "like carbuncles."[397:E]
Drayton describes this fabled stone with nearly as much precision as Chaucer; he calls it
A modern poet, remarkable for his powers of imagination, has beautifully, and very happily availed himself of these marvellous attributes, in describing the magnificent palace of Shedad, a passage which we shall transcribe, as it leads to an illustrative extract from a writer of Shakspeare's age:
"I have no where seen," says Mr. Southey in a note on these lines, "so circumstantial an account of its (the carbuncle's) wonderful properties as in a passage of Thuanus, quoted by Stephanius in his notes to Saxo-Grammaticus.
"Whilst the King was at Bologna, a stone, wonderful in its species and nature, was brought to him from the East Indies, by a man unknown, who appeared by his manners to be a Barbarian. It sparkled as though all burning, with an incredible splendour; flashing radiance, and shooting on every side its beams, it filled the surrounding air to a great distance with a light scarcely by any eyes endurable. In this also it was wonderful, that being most impatient of the earth, if it was confined, it would force its way, and immediately fly aloft; neither could it be contained by any art of man in a narrow place, but appeared only to love those of ample extent. It was of the utmost purity, stained by no soil nor spot. Certain shape it had none, for its figure was inconstant, and momentarily changing, and though at a distance it was beautiful to the eye, it would not suffer itself to be handled with impunity, but hurt those who obstinately struggled with it, as many persons before many spectators experienced. If by chance any part of it was broken off, for it was not very hard, it became nothing less."[398:A]
An account equally minute, and in terms nearly similar, occurs in Scot's Discoverie of Witchcraft, 1584, and both were probably taken from the same source, the writings of Fernel or Fernelius. This physician died in 1558; and his description, as copied by Scot, contributed, no doubt, to prolong the public credulity in this kingdom; though the English philosopher attempts to explain the phenomenon by supposing that actual flame was concentrated and burning in the centre of the gem.
"Johannes Fernelius writeth of a strange stone latelie brought out of India, which hath in it such a marvellous brightnes, puritie and shining, that therewith the aire round about is so lightned and cleared, that one may see to read thereby in the darknes of night. It will not be conteined in a close roome, but requireth an open and free place. It would not willingly rest or staie here belowe on the earth, but alwaies laboureth to ascend up into the aire. If one presse it downe with his hand, it resisteth, and striveth verie sharplie. It is beautifull to behold, without either spot or blemish, and yet verie unpleasant to taste or feele. If any part thereof be taken awaie, it is never a whit diminished, the forme thereof being inconstant, and at everie moment mutable."[399:A]
The carbuncle was believed to be an animal substance generated in the body of a serpent, to possess a sexual distinction, the males having a star-formed burning nucleus, while the females dispersed their brilliancy on all sides in a formless blaze; and, like other transparent gems, to have the power of expelling evil spirits.
While on the subject of superstitious notions relative to luminous bodies, we may remark, that in the age of Shakspeare, the wandering lights, termed Will-o-wisp and Jack-o-Lantern, were supposed by the common people to be occasioned by demons and malignant fairies, with the view of leading the benighted traveller to his destruction. "Many tymes," says Lavaterus, "candles and small fiers appeare in the night, and seeme to run up and downe;—those fiers some time seeme to come togither, and by and by to be severed and run abroade, and at the last to vanish clean away. Somtime these fiers go alone in the night season, and put such as see them, as they travel by night, in great fear. But these things, and many suche lyke, have their natural causes: and yet I will not denye, but that many tymes Dyvels delude men in this manner."[400:A]
Stephano, in the Tempest, attributes this phenomenon to the agency of a mischievous fairy: "Monster, your fairy, which, you say, is a harmless fairy, has done little better than played the Jack with us."[400:B]
Various causes have been assigned for the appearance of the ignis fatuus; modern chemistry asserts it to be occasioned by hydrogen gas, evolving from decaying vegetables, and the decomposition of pyritic coal; and when seen hovering on the surface of burial grounds, to originate from the same gas in a higher state of volatility, through the agency of phosphoric impregnation.
The partial view which we have now taken of the superstitions of the country, as they existed in the age of Shakspeare, will, in part, demonstrate how great was the credulity subsisting at this period; how well calculated were many of these popular delusions for the purposes of the dramatic writer, and how copiously and skilfully have these been moulded and employed by the great poet of our stage. A considerable portion also of the manners, customs, and diversions of the country, which had been necessarily omitted in the preceding chapters, will be found included in this sketch of a part of the popular creed, and will contribute to heighten the effect of a picture, which can only receive its completion through the mutual aid of various subsequent departments of the present work.
FOOTNOTES:
[315:A] Warton's History of English Poetry, vol. iii. p. 496.
[316:A] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. ix. p. 255, 256. Winter's Tale, act ii. sc. 1.
[317:A] "Of Ghostes and spirites walking by nyght, and of strange noyses, crackes, and sundry forewarnynges, whiche commonly happen before the death of menne, great slaughters, and alterations of kyngdomes. One Booke, Written by Lewes Lavaterus of Tigurine. And translated into Englyshe by R. H." Printed at London by Henry Benneyman, for Richard Watkyns, 1572. Vide p. 14. and 49.
[317:B] Lavaterus, p. 21.
[318:A] Scot's Discoverie of Witchcraft, 1580, p. 152, 153.
[318:B] Vide Burton's Anatomy of Melancholy, p. 172.
[318:C] Spectator, No. 419., vol. vi. p. 118. of Sharpe's edition. See also Nos. 12. 110. and 117.
[319:A] Grose's Provincial Glossary, p. 242, 243.
[321:A] Bourne's Antiquities of the Common People apud Brand, p. 113, 118, 119, 120, 122, 123.
[321:B] Seasons, Winter, line 617.
[322:A] Pleasures of Imagination, book i.
[322:B] The Remains of Henry Kirke White, vol. i. p. 311.
[323:A] Gay, in his Trivia, notices, at some length, the prognostications attendant on these days, and which equally apply to ancient and to modern times:—
[324:A] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. iv. p. 453. Midsummer-Night's Dream, act iv. sc. 1. Buchanan also beautifully records the same traditionary imagery:
[325:A] Bourne's Antiquities apud Brand, p. 253.
[326:A] Douce's Illustrations of Shakspeare, vol. ii. p. 252, 253.
[326:B] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. xviii. p. 281. Mr. Gay has more distinctly recorded this ceremony in the following lines:—
[327:A] "Et vere ad Valentini festum à viris habent fœminæ; munera, et alio temporis viris dantur." Moresini Deprav. Relig. 160.
[327:B] Douce's Illustrations of Shakspeare, vol. ii. p. 258.—"I have found unquestionable authority," remarks Mr. Brand, "to evince that the custom of chusing Valentines was a sport practised in the houses of the gentry in England as early as the year 1476." Brand apud Ellis, vol. i. p. 48.
The authority alluded to by Mr. Brand, is a letter, in Fenn's Paston Letters, vol. ii. p. 211., dated February 1476.
[328:A] Survey of London, 1618, p. 159.
[328:B] Ibid.
[328:C] Vide Strutt's Sports and Pastimes, p. 317.
[329:A] "L'origine de ce feu que tant de nations conservent encore, et qui se perd dans l'antiquité, est très simple. C'etoit un feu de joie allumé au moment où l'année commençoit; car la première de toutes les Annes, la plus ancienne donc on ait quelque connoissance, s'ouvroit au mois de Juin.—
"Ces feux-de-joie étoient accompagnés en même tems de Vœux et de sacrifices pour la prospérité de peuples et des biens de la terre: on dansoit aussi autour de ce feu; car ya-t-il quelque fête sans danse? et les plus agiles santoient par dessus. En se retirant, chacun empartoit un tison plus ou moins grand, et le reste étoit jetté au vent, afin qu'il emportât tout malheur comme il emportoit ces cendres." Hist. d'Hercule, p. 203.
[329:B] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. xi. p. 249. act ii. sc. 3.
[329:C] Jonson's Works, act i. sc. 6.
[329:D] Beaumont and Fletcher's Works apud Colman.
[330:A] Chalmers's English Poets, vol. vi. p. 281. Britannia's Pastorals, book ii. song 2.
[330:B] Grose's Provincial Glossary, p. 299.
[330:C] Ibid. p. 285.
[331:A] Bourne's Antiquities, p. 301.
[331:B] Stowe also mentions, that bonefires and rejoicings were observed on the Eve of St. Peter and Paul the Apostles; he gives likewise a curious account of the Marching Watches which had been regularly kept on Midsummer-Eve, time out of mind, by the citizens of London and other large towns; but these had ceased before the age of Shakspeare, the last having been appointed by Sir John Gresham, in 1548, though an attempt was made to procure their revival, by John Montgomery in 1585, who published a book on the subject, dedicated to Sir Thos. Pullison, then Lord Mayor; this offer however did not succeed.
[332:A] Grose's Provincial Glossary, p. 285.
[332:B] Queenhoo-Hall, vol. i. p. 136.
[333:A] Aubrey's Miscellanies, p. 103.
[333:B] Jonson's Works, fol. edit. vol. i.
[334:A] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. v. p. 359. act iii. sc. 4.
[334:B] Bourne's Antiquities, p. 320, 321.
[334:C] Vide Job, chap. xxxiii. v. 22, 23.
[335:A] Opera et Dies, vol. i. 246.
[335:B] Dionys. in Cælest. Hierarch. cap. ix. x.
[335:C] Calv. Lib. Instit. I. c. xiv. It is worthy of remark, that Reginald Scot, from whose Discoverie of Witchcraft, p. 500., this account of the hierarchy of Dionysius is taken, has brought forward a passage from his kinsman Edward Deering, which broaches the same doctrine as that held by Bishop Horsley in the last sermon which he ever wrote. "If you read Deering," says Scot, "upon the first chapter to the Hebrues, you shall see this matter (the angelic theory of Dionysius) notablie handled; where he saith, that whensoever archangell is mentioned in the Scriptures it signifieth our saviour Christ, and no creature." p. 501.—Now in the sermon alluded to by Horsley, the text of which is Dan. iv. 17., he affirms, that the term "Michael," or "Michael the Archangel," wherever it occurs, is nothing more than a name for our Saviour. Vide Sermons, vol. ii. p. 376.
[337:A] Of Ghostes and Spirites walking by nyght; p. 160, 161.
[338:A] Scot's Discoverie of Witchcraft, p. 505, 506.
[338:B] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. xii. p. 109. Henry IV. Part ii. act ii. sc. 4.
[338:C] Ibid. vol. xii. p. 36. Henry IV. Part ii. act i. sc. 2.
[338:D] Ibid. vol. xvii. p. 94, 95. Antony and Cleopatra, act ii. sc. 3.
[338:E] Ibid. vol. x. p. 149.
[339:A] Book iv. line 677.
[340:A] Sermons, vol. ii. p. 412. 415, 416.
[341:A] Vide Brady's Clavis Calendaria, vol. ii. p. 180.
[341:B] Brand's Appendix to Bourne's Antiquities, p. 382.
[341:C] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. iv. p. 205. act ii. sc. 1.
[342:A] Clavis Calendaria, vol. ii. p. 229.
[343:A] Scott's Minstrelsy of the Scottish Border, vol. ii. p. 221.
[343:B] Ibid. vol. ii. p. 238.
[344:A] Scott's Minstrelsy, vol. ii. p. 221, 222.
[346:A] The powers of description which Burns has evinced in one of the stanzas, while relating the effects of this spell, are truly great:—
[347:A] Burns's Works, Currie's edit. vol. iii. p. 126. et seq.
[347:B] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. xvii. p. 472-474.
[348:A] Scot's Discoverie of Witchcraft, p. 87.
[348:B] See Beaumont and Fletcher apud Colman.
It would appear from the passage just quoted from Shakspeare, that he considered St. Withold as commanding this female incubus to alight from those she was riding and tormenting; but Fuseli and Darwin, in their delineations, appear to have mounted a male fiend, or incubus, on her back, who descending from his steed, sate on the breasts of those whom he had selected for his victims. The personifications of the painter and the modern poet are forcibly drawn and highly terrific:—
Botanic Garden, 4to. edit. p. 101-103.
[350:A] Scot's Discoverie of Witchcraft, p. 203-205.
[351:A] The Dutchesse of Malfy, act iii. sc. 3. Vide Ancient British Drama, vol. iii. p. 526.
[351:B] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. x. p. 418, 419.
[352:A] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. xviii. p. 16. Hamlet, act i. sc. 1.
[352:B] Ibid. vol. xvi. p. 315. Julius Cæsar, act ii. sc. 2.
[353:A] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. x. p. 127. Macbeth, act ii. sc. 3.
[354:A] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. xi. p. 82, 83. Act ii. sc. 4.
[354:B] Ibid. vol. xi. p. 317. First Part of King Henry IV. act iii. sc. 1.
[354:C] Ibid. vol. xiv. p. 202, 203. Third Part of King Henry VI. act v. sc. 6.
[355:A] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. xv. p. 448. Troilus and Cressida, act v. sc. 3.
[355:B] Ibid. vol. xx. p. 225. Act v. sc. 1.
[355:C] Ibid. vol. xv. p. 395. Act iv. sc. 4.
[355:D] Familiar Letters, edit. 1726. p. 247.
[355:E] Lady of the Lake, p. 348.
[356:A] Lady of the Lake, p. 106. 347.
[357:A] Lady of the Lake, p. 348.
[358:A] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. iv. p. 28. Act i. sc. 2.
[358:B] Ibid. vol. xiv. p. 506. Act v. sc. 3.
[359:A] Of Ghostes and Spirites, 1572. p. 79.
[359:B] Vide Grose's Provincial Glossary, article Popular Superstitions, p. 282, 283.
[360:A] Grant's Essays on the Superstitions of the Highlanders of Scotland, vol. i. p. 259-261.
[361:A] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. x. p. 459.
[362:A] Of Ghostes and Spirites, p. 77-79.
[362:B] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. v. p. 169. Act iv. sc. 2.
[362:C] Discoverie of Witchcraft, p. 279.
[362:D] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. xvii. p. 230. Act iv. sc. 10.
[363:A] Discoverie of Witchcraft, p. 336.
[363:B] Reed's Shakspeare, vol. xiii. p. 152. First Part of King Henry VI. act v. sc. 3.
[363:C] Discoverie of Witchcraft, p. 279.
[364:A] Scot's Discoverie of Witchcraft, p. 230. 270.
[364:B] Discoverie of Witchcraft, p. 231.
[365:A] Scot's Discoverie of Witchcraft, p. 247.
[365:B] Ibid. p. 245.
[366:A] Scot's Discoverie of Witchcraft, p. 265, 266.
[366:B] See Whalley's Works of Ben Jonson.