The immoveable articulations are sometimes with surfaces inserted into each other, as the bones of the cranium, in which many projections and depressions reciprocally receive each other; sometimes with surfaces in juxta-position, as in the articulation of the temporal with the parietal, the two superior maxillary bones with each other; sometimes with implanted surfaces, as in the teeth.
All the different divisions that I have mentioned will be easily understood by the following table; it is not the same as that which I have given in my treatise on the membranes; I think it presents a classification a little more useful in this, that it offers for a characteristic two things essential to be known in all kinds of moveable articulations, viz. 1st, the relation of the articular surfaces which characterizes the orders; 2d, the number of motions of each which distinguishes the genera. There are no orders in the immoveable articulations because, except the relation of surfaces, the articulations have not differences sufficient to occasion them to be sub-divided.
| Table of the Articulations. | ||
|---|---|---|
| ARTICULATIONS. | ||
| CLASSES. | ORDERS. | GENERA. |
| 1st. Moveable. | 1st. With Contiguous Surfaces. | 1st. Extensive Opposition, Circumduction and Rotation. |
| 2d. Extensive Opposition and Circumduction. | ||
| 3d. Limited Opposition. | ||
| 4th. Rotation. | ||
| 5th. Sliding. | ||
| 2d. With Continuous Surfaces. | ||
| 2d. Immoveable. | 1st. With Surfaces in juxta-position. | |
| 2d. With Surfaces inserted into each other. | ||
| 3d. With Surfaces implanted. | ||
After having thus divided the articulations, let us offer upon each class some general observations. But let us first remark that the preceding table, considered in respect to the moveable articulations with contiguous surfaces, indicates perfectly the disposition of these articulations as to luxations, which are so much the more frequent as the motions are more extensive. The first genus is the most exposed to it, the last the least so; and the others are more or less so according to their distance from the first.
The class of moveable articulations is the most important to be considered, because their mechanism is the most complicated of the two orders composing this class, as we have seen. The latter, or that of the articulations with continuous surfaces, will not be considered in our general observations, as it embraces only one species of motion, that of the vertebræ, this motion will be noticed in the examination of the spine. The order of the moveable articulations with contiguous surfaces, comprises, as we have said, five genera characterized by their respective motions.
Extensive opposition, circumduction and rotation characterize this genus. The first by the extent and number of its motions. The articulations of the humerus with the scapula and the femur with the ilium are examples of it; they even exclusively compose it.
We see why it is at the superior part of the limbs that nature has placed this genus. A double advantage results from this situation. On the one hand, very far from the part of the limb immediately exposed to the action of external bodies, it more easily escapes luxations to which its want of solidity renders it liable. On the other hand, it can by this situation give to the limb the motions of a whole which compensate for those of the inferior articulations, the solidity of which prevents the power of motion in all directions. For example, the two articulations of which I have just spoken, are not only the articulations of the bones that form them, of the humerus and the femur, but also the articulations of the whole limb, which they direct in different directions; thus the anchylosis of these articulations renders the limb completely useless, whilst that of the inferior articulations only destroys partial motions.
The kind of motion of this genus of articulation requires a rounded form in the articular surfaces, whether they be concave that receive and convex that are received. This form is in fact the only one that can accommodate itself to extensive opposition, rotation and circumduction united; this is the form of the superior parts of the humerus with the scapula, and the femur with the os innominatum. The bone which moves has a convex surface, that which serves for support a concave one. There are in animals examples of an opposite arrangement: that is to say that a concavity is moved in all directions upon a convexity; but this is not found in man.
Though the two limbs have between them the greatest analogy in their motions, yet there are some differences relative especially to their respective uses, which in the one are for seizing and repelling bodies, in the other destined to locomotion. The principal of these differences is, that rotation and circumduction are found in them in an exactly inverse ratio. The mechanical reason and advantages of this arrangement are easily understood.
In the femur the length of the neck which is the lever of rotation, gives much extent to this motion, which supplies the pronation and supination that are wanting in the leg; so that every rotation of the foot is a motion of the whole of the limb. In the humerus on the contrary, the neck being very short and bringing the axis of the bone near the centre of the motion, limits rotation, which is less necessary on account of that of the fore-arm; the motion of the hand without or within is never communicated but by a part of the limb.
As to circumduction, the length of the neck of the thigh is an obstacle to it. In fact, let us remark that this motion is much the more easy, when it is performed by a rectilinear lever, because then the axis of the motion is the axis of the lever; that on the contrary, if the lever is angular, the motion becomes so much the more difficult because the axis of the motion is not that of the lever; and in general we can say, that the difficulty of the motion is in the direct ratio of the distance of the two axes.
This being settled, let us observe that the axis of the motion of circumduction of the thigh is evidently a straight line, obliquely directed from the head to the condyles, and distant consequently above from the axis of the bone, the whole length of the neck. Now, from what has just been said, it is evident, that the difficulty of circumduction will be in the direct ratio of the length of the neck, and consequently very great. In the humerus, on the contrary, the neck being very short, the axis of the bone and that of the motion are almost the same; hence the facility and extent of the circumduction. We might fix precisely the relation of these motions by this proportion; the circumduction of the humerus is to that of the femur, as the length of the neck of the humerus is to the length of the neck of the femur; which shows us how much more difficult the circumduction of the femur is than that of the humerus. To know this, it is sufficient in fact to know the excess of the length of the neck of the first over that of the second.
It is easy to perceive the advantages of this very great extent in the circumduction of the superior limbs destined to seize, and of the limits placed by nature to that of the inferior limbs destined to standing and locomotion. We understand also why luxations are more easy in the first than in the second. The displacement almost always takes place in fact, in one of the simple motions, the succession of which forms the compound motion of circumduction, for example, in elevation or depression, in adduction or abduction, &c. Now all these motions being carried much further in the humerus than in the femur, the surfaces are more easily separated.
This genus differs from the first by the absence of the motion of rotation. Opposition and circumduction are alone met with in it. We find examples of it in the temporal maxillary, sterno-clavicular, radio-carpal, meta-carpo-phalangeal articulations, &c.
The want of rotation evidently supposes, from what has been said above, the absence of an osseous head, the axis of which would make, as in the preceding genus, an angle with the axis of the body of the bone. Thus in all the bones of the articulations that I have just mentioned, the articular surface is at the extremity even of the bone, and not upon the side; the axis is the same in both cases. They form a rectilinear lever, instead of an angular one.
The articular surfaces are in general, as in the preceding case, uniform, without eminences and reciprocal depressions; which would embarrass and even prevent circumduction. In the bone which serves for support, there is a cavity more or less deep; in the bone which is moved, there is an analogous convexity. The corresponding surfaces of the temporal and the inferior maxillary bone, of the bones of the metacarpus and the first phalanges, are examples of this arrangement.
This articular mode is the most favourably disposed for circumduction, which is, as we have seen, constantly in the inverse ratio of rotation, and which consequently has the greatest possible facility when the lever is rectilinear, a circumstance that destroys rotation. Yet in many articulations of this genus, circumduction is evidently less extensive than in the humerus and the femur; but this arises from the arrangement of the moving powers which being in much greater number in the articulations of these two bones, compensate for the bad arrangement of the articular surfaces for circumduction.
In the genus of articulations of which we are treating, there is always one direction in which the motion of opposition is more easy than in the others; for example, it is elevation and depression in the jaw, flexion and extension in the first phalanges, in the wrist, &c. In general there are two lateral ligaments and the capsule in the direction in which the motions are most limited, the capsule only in that in which they are the most extensive.
As we advance in the examination of these articular genera, the extent of their motion diminishes. This has less opposition in many directions than the preceding, and less circumduction which always supposes an extensive opposition. Here this opposition is always limited to one direction only, to that of flexion and extension, for example.
We find this articular genus especially in the middle of the limbs, as at the elbow, the knee, the middle of the fingers in the articulations of the phalanges. Though the bone which composes them, inferiorly can move by itself but in one direction, yet it borrows from the loose motions of the superior articulation of the limb, so as to be able to be turned in every way.
The articular surfaces are found here as in the preceding genus, at the extremity of the bone, having the same axis as the bone; but they differ, 1st, in this that there are many eminences and cavities fitted to each other, an arrangement, which, by permitting the motion in one direction, prevents it in the others. Very commonly there are two kinds of round prominences, called condyles, which roll from before behind, or from without within, &c. upon two analogous cavities, that are separated by an eminence, which is received in the space between the condyles, as we see in the femoro-tibial, phalangeal articulations, &c. 2d. The breadth of the surfaces also distinguishes this genus from the preceding; this breadth insures its solidity, and prevents luxations, which besides are more to be feared when they happen here where more ligaments must be broken than elsewhere.
There is always in this genus greater extent of motion on one side, than on the opposite. In general flexion has always more extended limits than extension; observe in fact the condyles of the femur, of the phalanges, &c. they are extended much further in the first than the second direction; why? because all our principal motions are those of flexion, and the motions of extension are as it were but to moderate the first, and have for their object only to bring back the limb to the position from which it can be bent again. Hence why the number, and the strength of the fibres are much greater in the flexors than in the extensors; why the great vascular and nervous trunks are always on the side of flexion, as we see in the thigh, the leg, the fore-arm, the phalanges, &c. There is always something which limits the motion of extension, as the olecranon in the humero-cubital articulation, the crucial ligaments in the femoro-tibial articulation.
Though in the genus which we are describing, there is no well marked motion of circumduction, yet when the leg or the fore-arm are in flexion, they can move laterally and even in the form of a cone, but not in a very evident manner. In extension this is impossible, because the lateral ligaments being much stretched, do not yield enough to allow the bone to incline from one side to the other.
Every kind of opposition and circumduction is wanting in this genus, which presents rotation alone, as we see in the articulations of the ulna with the radius, and the atlas with the odontoid process. Sometimes it is a concave surface rolling upon a convex one, as at the lower end of the radius, and at the odontoid process; sometimes it is a convex surface moving upon a concave one, as at the head of the radius; there is always a kind of ligament which completes the concave surface, and which thus forms a ring turning upon the bone, or in which the bone turns.
Luxations are here very difficult, because the rotation being made upon the axis of the bone, the ligaments are hardly more distended on one side than the other, and are hence broken with difficulty, whatever may be the extent of the motion. The inferior part of the radius forms a slight exception to this rule, because it is upon the ulna, and not exactly upon its own axis, that the bone turns in this place.
There is no rotation in the leg as in the fore-arm, because, as we have seen, that of the thigh which is very extensive, supplies the place of it; which the humerus could hardly do for the fore-arm, as we know when this last is anchylosed.
Every kind of rotation, opposition and circumduction are wanting in this genus, which is the most numerous, and which embraces the articulations of the carpus, the metacarpus, the tarsus and metatarsus, of the vertebræ between themselves by their articular processes, of the atlas with the occiput, of the humeral extremity of the clavicle, the sternal of the ribs, and the superior of the fibula. There is only a kind of slipping more or less obscure, and in which the osseous surfaces hardly ever leave each other. These surfaces are almost all plain, very close together, united by a considerable number of ligaments, and so strong in their connexion, that luxations hardly ever happen to them. Another reason moreover which renders them difficult, is that all this genus of articulations belongs almost wholly to short bones; now we know, that the motion imparted to a bone has a power of action which is in direct ratio of its length, and in the inverse of its smallness; for example, the same power applied to the tibial extremity of the femur, would luxate much more easily the ischiatic extremity, than if it acted upon the middle of this bone.
As the separate motion of each of the articulations of the fifth genus is almost nothing, nature usually unites several at the same place, for the purpose of producing a sensible, general motion, as we see in the carpus, the tarsus, the vertebræ, &c.; this is also a reason of the difficulty there is in luxating this genus of articulations. In fact, how great the general motions may be, two bones, taken separately, move but little upon each other; now it is only the extent of the motion of the two separate bones from each other, that can produce the displacement.
We have only pointed out orders in this class, because its varieties are not sufficiently great to assign genera for them.
1st. The order of immoveable articulations with surfaces in juxta-position, is met with where the mechanism of the part alone is almost sufficient to insure the solidity of the bones which are found only placed at the side of each other, without holding by any insertion, and having only between them a slight cartilaginous layer; the superior maxillary bones, wedged in between the malar bones, the ossa ungues, the ethmoid, the ossa palati, the vomer, and the frontal bone, are supported more by the general mechanism of the face, than by any articular attachments that unite them to each other; thus the squamous portion of the temporal bone supports the parietal, more by the abutting arches, than by the manner of the union of their respective surfaces. Remove this general mechanism of the part, you will soon see all the articulations separate.
2d. The order of immoveable articulations with inserted surfaces, owes also in some measure its solidity to the general mechanism of the part; but this mechanism would be insufficient to insure this solidity; thus the bones, instead of having almost plain surfaces, exhibit very evident prominences and depressions which are inserted into each other, as we see in the articulations of the parietal bones with each other, with the sphenoid, the occipital, the frontal, &c.; these are called sutures. This order sometimes approximates the preceding, as in the union of the parietal and frontal bones, which, reciprocally aiding each other, are supported by this mechanism, more than by their insertions; sometimes it resembles the following order, as in the articulation of the occipital and parietal bones, in which the very deep insertions almost alone insure the solidity of the union. This order is never seen except upon the edges of the flat bones; the insertion of these edges compensates for their want of size, by multiplying the points of contact. The eminences and depressions forming the insertion are always of an irregular form and size. They are exactly fitted to each other, they are not alike in two bones of the same species, taken from two different subjects; so that we cannot unite to a detached left parietal bone, the right parietal bone of another individual. There has been much dispute upon the formation of the sutures; they are an effect of the laws of ossification, an effect which we can account for no more than we can for all the others, and all the general phenomena of growth; we shall see the progress they follow in this formation. This articular order is gradually effaced with age, and the bones unite together by the ossification of the thin intermediate cartilage. It is more rare that the preceding order disappears. I have seen, however, in extreme old age, different articulations of this order cease to be evident, those of the maxillary bones between themselves especially.
3d. The order of articulations with implanted surfaces borrows none of its solidity from the mechanism of the part; it owes it entirely to the relation of the surfaces, which are so united and embraced by each other, that displacement is impossible. There is but one example of this articular order, it is the teeth with the jaws.
Age does not here efface the articulation, and thus confound the two bones as in the preceding orders, because the medium of union is the palatine membrane, which belongs to the mucous system, and which by its organization has no tendency to ossification; whereas in the preceding cases, the intermediate cartilage has a natural disposition to become encrusted with the phosphate of lime.
The articular surfaces would soon separate, if different organs did not retain them in place. These organs are the cartilages and the membranes for the immoveable articulations, the ligaments and the muscles for the moveable.
The two first orders of immoveable articulations, those with inserted surfaces and those with surfaces in juxta-position, have cartilages between the osseous surfaces, the breadth and thickness of which are found so much the greater in proportion as they are examined in subjects nearest infancy. Almost all the bones of the head are held together in this manner, which allows them to yield a little, and consequently prevents their fracture.
In the articulations of the pelvis, there are besides the cartilages, ligaments; but as these articulations perform in certain cases small sliding motions, we can consider them as intermediate between the moveable and immoveable articulations; it is on this account that they have the two kinds of organs especially destined to strengthen the articular surfaces of each of the classes, viz. the cartilages and the ligaments.
The immoveable articulations with implanted surfaces, an order which comprehends only the teeth, have nothing between the surfaces as a means of union, but a mucous membrane, the palatine. Hence why in the swellings of this membrane, in scorbutic affections, after the use of mercury, &c. the teeth become loose.
The moveable articulations with contiguous surfaces have the ligaments especially as a means of union, which are found in the five genera, but under different forms which will be examined hereafter. This kind of organ unites much suppleness with great resistance, a double attribute which it derives from its peculiar texture, and which renders it very proper for this function. Let us observe however that these two properties are in an inverse ratio in the two extreme ages of life, that suppleness is the companion of infancy, that stiffness and resistance are the character of the ligaments in old age. Hence in part the multiplicity of motions in one age, and their slowness and difficulty in the other.
The cartilages are not in this articular order, as in the preceding, means of union, but means of motion, by their smooth and polished surfaces.
As to the synovial membrane that is found exclusively in this order, such is its extreme tenuity, that it can hardly be considered as uniting the surfaces, and its use appears to be confined to the exhalation of synovia.
It is not the same with the muscles; they can be considered as forming at the same time around the moveable articulations, a power for the whole of the bone, and a resistance for its extremities, which they prevent from being displaced, by forming around them supports, the efficiency of which is in proportion to the efforts that are made to displace these extremities. In fact, it is in the great motions that these efforts are the most considerable; now then the neighbouring muscles of articulation strongly contracted, hard during their contractions, have a powerful tendency to prevent the osseous extremity from abandoning that which corresponds with it. In rest when the relaxed muscles offer but little resistance, the effort for support is nothing. A paralyzed limb can be luxated much more easily than another, by external violence.
The order of moveable articulations with contiguous surfaces, has as a means of union, a substance, the nature of which is between that of the ligaments and that of the cartilages.
There is no system in which anatomists have traced in a more accurate manner than in this, the different states in the different periods of life. The remarkable difference of a bone examined in the first months when gelatine almost alone composes it, compared with a bone of an adult in which the calcareous substance predominates, has especially arrested their attention upon this point. Let us examine the phenomena of ossification in all the ages; these phenomena should be considered during and after growth. In general, while this continues, there are some portions of the osseous system not ossified, as the neck of the femur, for example; ossification is not complete, the bones are not perfectly developed until towards the sixteenth or eighteenth year, and sometimes even later.
We commonly distinguish three states in the development of the bones, viz. the mucous, the cartilaginous and the osseous states.
The mucous state may be considered as existing at two periods: 1st. In the first days of the development of the embryo, a period in which the whole of its organs forms only a homogeneous and mucous mass, in which it is not possible to distinguish any line of demarcation, and in which the parenchymas of nutrition alone exist. All the organs are then of the same nature; the bones are in fact mucous like all the other organs, if by this word we understand a state in which the cellular texture existing alone with the vessels and the nerves, is penetrated by so large a quantity of juices, that it has the form of a mucilage, and gives the appearance of it to the embryo. 2d. We may understand by the words mucous state, that more advanced period of osseous nutrition, in which the bones can be already distinguished, seen through the transparency that the other parts of the limb still have, and in which they have a consistence much greater than that of the parts which surround them; now this state is only the commencement of that of cartilage; for the parenchyma of nutrition takes the cartilaginous character when it begins to be penetrated by gelatine, and it is in fact penetrated by this substance when it has more consistence, since it is that which gives it this consistence, and hence an existence distinct from the surrounding parts. If in the early periods, this cartilage is softer, if it flattens under the finger when pressed, if it even has an appearance partly mucous, it is because the gelatine is not yet in sufficiently large proportion, and because the nutritive parenchyma still predominates; gradually its quantity increases, and then the cartilaginous nature is more evidently developed.
It follows hence that the bones have three periods in their development; one is common to them with all the other organs; it is the mucous period; the two others especially characterize them; these are the cartilaginous and osseous periods. Let us examine their phenomena.
All the bones are cartilaginous before taking their last form. This state of cartilage begins at a period that is difficult to be determined; it is when on the one hand the circulating system begins to carry gelatine and present it to the organs, and when on the other the organic sensibility of the parenchyma of nutrition of the bones is put in relation with this substance. Then the consistence of the bone is constantly increasing, because the gelatine is constantly accumulating; now it accumulates in the same direction that the phosphate of lime afterwards takes; that is to say, in the long bones it is in the middle of the body, in the flat bones it is in the centre, and in the short ones it is in the centre also, that this substance is at first exhaled, which afterwards extends gradually to the extremities of the first, the circumference of the second and the surface of the third. I would observe however that we do not see, during the formation of the cartilaginous bone, those longitudinal striæ in the long bones, radiated ones in the flat, irregularly crossed ones in the short, which distinguish the osseous state in its formation, and which seem to indicate to the eye the course of the phosphate of lime.
The cartilaginous state exhibits a peculiarity that distinguishes it from the osseous state; it is that all the bones that are to be afterwards united by means of cartilage, such as those of the cranium, the face, the vertebral column and the pelvis make only one piece; whilst all those that are to be held together by ligaments, whose articulations are consequently moveable, are found very distinct, as the femur, the tibia, the clavicle, &c.
The broad bones, those of the cranium especially, do not exhibit in so distinct a manner the cartilaginous state. Their appearance, at this period of ossification, is even rather membranous. It arises from this; as they are found interposed between the periosteum and the dura mater, and as their tenuity is very great, we can with difficulty distinguish them on the interior of these two membranes. But when we dissect the parts with care, we can distinguish the bone yet soft, from this double covering.
The cartilaginous state appears in the clavicle, the scapula, the ribs, before being discoverable in the other bones in which it is afterwards seen. When we examine the bones in this state, we find them of different consistence and solidity; where the exhalation of gelatine has commenced, they are incompletely cartilaginous; as we go from this point, they partake more or less of the mucous state. The cartilaginous bone has no internal cavity, no medullary system, &c.
When the whole bone is cartilaginous, and even when some points appear to be still mucous, the exhalation of calcareous substance begins, and then the osseous state manifests itself; the following is the manner; the bone becomes more dense, then of a deeper colour, and finally of a very evident yellow in its middle, that is to say where the ossification should begin; gradually a red point appears; these are the vessels that begin to receive the red portion of the blood, and not to be developed as some anatomists pretend, to be hollowed out according to their expression, by the force of the impulse of the heart. They always existed; the white fluids alone penetrated them before, then the red globules are admitted into them. At the same time the neighbouring parts are encrusted with calcareous substance. This period is then remarkable in two particulars, viz. in respect to the entrance of the blood into the cartilaginous bone, and in regard to the exhalation of the phosphate of lime. These two phenomena are always inseparable; when there is redness in one part of the cartilages, there are also osseous points; this is observed not only in common ossification, but also in those which are not so, such as the ossifications of the cartilages of the larynx, of the ribs, &c. When we examine the progress of the exhalation of the earthy substance, we see always in the bones, whether long, flat or short, a very red vascular layer, between the cartilage and the portion of ossified bone. This layer seems to serve as a precursor to the osseous state. Why do the vessels of the bones which before had admitted only white fluids, receive then red globules? It is not, as Boerhaave would have said, had he treated of ossification, because their caliber increases, but because the sum of their organic sensibility increasing, they are then found in relation with the red portion, which until then was foreign to them. Their caliber might be treble or quadruple the diameter of the red globules, but these would not enter if the organic sensibility repelled them, as the larynx rises against a body which attempts to enter it, though this body may be infinitely less than the glottis. It is by an increase of organic sensibility, that must also be explained how the bone, until then a stranger to calcareous substance, being in relation only with the gelatine, appropriates also to itself the first of these substances, and is penetrated with ease.
I will observe only that there is this difference between the exhalation of the two, that the first comes immediately from the red portion of the blood, since wherever it is deposited, there is, as I have said, blood vessels; whilst the second appears to come immediately from the white fluids, since the vessels of the tendons, the cartilages and the other parts that they nourish, do not evidently receive in their natural state any red globules, and all that circulates in them appears to be white.
The osseous state commences with the end of the first month in the clavicle, the ribs, &c.; it is a little more slow in the other bones; we know not its precise period. The following is its progress in the three kinds of bones.
We distinguish at first in the middle of these bones, a small osseous cylinder, very slender in its centre, enlarging towards the extremities, hollow in the interior for the rudiments of the medullary system, perforated by a nourishing foramen whose size is then in proportion very great, receiving also a very large vessel. This osseous cylinder, at first very slender in comparison with the cartilaginous extremities of the bone, is in a very evident disproportion to them in this respect; it is formed of very delicate fibres, and is gradually enlarged and extended, until it reaches near the extremities where it is found at birth; the most of these extremities are not then bony. Some time after, and at a period which varies in the different bones, there is developed in these extremities an osseous point which begins at the centre, and which is always preceded by the passage of the blood in the vessels. These new germs increase at the expense of the cartilage which is gradually lessened between the body and the extremity of the bone; at the end of some time there remains only a slight partition which ossification also seizes upon; so that the bone is then wholly osseous from one extremity to the other. The secondary points which are developed in the different apophyses, also unite; so that its substance is everywhere homogeneous. It is not until the age of sixteen or eighteen years, that nature has completely finished this work.
The mode of origin of ossification varies in this kind of bones. Those which are symmetrical, have always two points or more, which correspond upon each side of the median line; sometimes one of them is found upon this line. When these points of ossification are in equal number, they are always upon the sides; if they are in unequal number, one of them is upon the line.
The irregular bones sometimes have but one of them, as in the parietal; at other times many appear in them, as in the temporal; but there is never a similar arrangement among them; only they correspond with those of the opposite bone.
At the first point of ossification in a broad bone, we perceive at first reddish spots, then we observe the phosphate of lime spreading in rays from the centre to the circumference of the bone. The osseous rays are very evident upon the bones of the cranium. Portions not ossified at first fill their interstices, which new rays afterwards occupy. All terminate in an unequal manner, without touching, so that by separating an ossified portion of a broad bone from the membranous portion to which it belongs, its circumference looks cut like the extremity of a comb; hence, as we shall see, the origin of sutures.
The delicacy of these bones is extreme in the early periods; they have not then any of the texture of the cells. At birth but few of the osseous centres are yet united; cartilaginous and membranous spaces separate them; these spaces are greater towards the angles than towards the edges, and generally at points the most distant from the primitive osseous centres. The bones with many points of ossification are formed of separate pieces, more or less distant from each other. Those with one point only, have but one piece.
After birth these bones extend more and more, their thickness and hardness increase; they are divided into two compact layers, the space between which is filled by the texture of the cells; gradually they touch at their edges, and then the sutures are formed in the cranium; for there is this difference between their ossification and that of the long bones, that it takes place always from the centre to the circumference, and that new osseous points are not developed at the circumference to meet those of the centre. But when this happens, the union does not then take place as in the long bones, but sutures are formed; and it is this which occasions the ossa wormiana, which are so much the larger as the osseous point is the sooner developed, because it has had time to extend itself more, before meeting the general ossification of the bone.
When a broad bone is developed by many points and there exists upon its surface an articular surface, it is usually the centre in which all the points unite at the period in which ossification terminates; we see this in the cotyloid cavity, in the condyle of the occipital bone, &c.
There is often in the broad bones two well marked periods for their ossification; it is so in those which, like the sacrum and sternum, are developed by a great number of points. These points begin at first to unite into three or four principal pieces which divide the bone; this is the first period; then much later, the union of the pieces takes place; this is the second period.
The short bones remain in general longer cartilaginous than the others. Often at birth many are still so, those of the tarsus and carpus in particular. The body of the vertebræ is ossified sooner; a point is developed at the centre, and extends over the whole surface.
These phenomena are nearly analogous to those of the ossification of the extremities of the long bones, which the short bones resemble so much. After birth, the whole cartilaginous portion, is, if we may so say, invaded by the calcareous substance, which mixes with it, and there is finally only the articular cartilages left.
There are bones, as the occipital and sphenoid, which partake of the character of the broad and short bones; their ossification is mixed, and follows the mode of one or the other, according to the part of the bone that we examine.
The bones, having become completely ossified, continue to undergo different phenomena which anatomists have too much neglected. The general growth in height is terminated when ossification is complete; and it even appears that the term of these two is nearly the same; but that in breadth continues for a long time after; compare the small and slender body of a young man of eighteen years, with the stout and well proportioned one of a man of forty, and you will see the difference. The bones follow the general law; their nutrition is prolonged for their thickness, when that for their length ceases. It appears that then the vessels which penetrate by the foramina of the first and second order, do not contribute to this nutrition, which draws its materials from those of the third; now, as we know that these very superficial vessels are arrested in the external fibres of the bone, and do not penetrate within, we understand, 1st, how, the growth going on without, the bone increases in thickness; 2d, how this increase takes place especially on the compact texture, the proportional thickness of which is in the direct ratio of the age, as we may see by inspecting the different bones of the child, the adult and the old person.
This external growth has made it believed that the periosteum contributes to it especially by the ossification of its layers; but we shall see in the article upon this membrane, what opinion should be entertained upon this subject.
It is principally at this period in which the work of nutrition seems spread upon the osseous surface, that the different eminences, which are scattered over this surface, become more evident; then especially all the prominences of insertion become more prominent; there is in respect to these eminences a remarkable difference between the skeleton of a child and that of a full grown man. In the fœtus they hardly exist, as we see particularly by the different apophyses of the vertebræ, the spinous especially. As these eminences are generally the most distant parts from the primitive osseous centres, it appears that it is to this circumstance that must be attributed the slowness of their formation, since ossification always goes from points where it begins, to the most distant ones.
When the bone has all its dimensions it still continues to be the seat of a very active nutrition; exhalation constantly brings to it gelatinous and calcareous substances which absorption afterwards takes up; so that it is continually composed and recomposed. The experiment with madder evidently proves this; if we feed an animal for some time upon this, the bones become red much more easily, in proportion as the animal is younger; so that by amputating a limb after some time, the bones have an appearance wholly different from what is natural to them; if, after this amputation, we discontinue the use of the madder for some time, and then amputate another limb, the bones will be found to have entirely resumed their natural colour; now we know that the calcareous substance is the vehicle of the colouring matter, since while the bones are only cartilaginous the madder has no effect upon them. The calcareous substance is then alternately furnished and taken away from the bones. Besides, the formation and resolution of exostoses, the softening and brittleness of the bones, the phenomena of the production of callus, &c. are they not an evident proof of the exhalation and absorption of this principle? It appears clearly that the urinary system is the way by which nature gets rid of the calcareous and even of the gelatinous substance. It would be curious to analyze accurately the urine of ricketty patients, and that of those affected with cancer; it is probable that the first of these substances predominates in the urine of the first, and the second in that of the others; I know of no positive experiments upon the subject.
Can we, by giving to patients gelatine or the phosphate of lime, restore to their bones the suppleness or solidity which they have lost? No, because it is necessary not only to introduce these substances into the economy but also to restore to the bones their peculiar organic sensibility which they no longer have, and which, by placing these substances in relation to them, would enable them to appropriate these to their own nourishment. The blood might be loaded with earthy and gelatinous principles, and the bones would repel these principles, so long as their sensibility was not in relation with them.
The double motion of nutrition continues always in the bones, as we advance in age; but its proportions change. The gelatine is constantly diminishing and the calcareous substance constantly increasing. Finally, in extreme old age this last predominates so much, that it would destroy their life, if general death did not take place before that of the bones.
It is to this that must be attributed the greyish colour that these organs then take; hence also their constantly increasing weight; hence consequently the difficulty of the motions of the limbs, since at the same time that the force of the muscular powers is diminished by age, the osseous resistance which they have to overcome increases.
At this period of life, the calcareous substance predominates so much in the economy, that it is thrown upon different organs, such as the arteries, the cartilages, the tendons, which then take the osseous character. We might say that by accumulating in our parts this substance foreign to life, nature wishes to prepare them insensibly for death.
In general, it is those organs whose nutritive substance is gelatine, which have the greatest tendency to be placed in relation with the calcareous substance, and consequently to be encrusted with it. Hence why the cartilages especially are ossified; why those of the sutures disappearing, the bones of the cranium become continuous; why the larynx is finally almost all osseous; why the cartilages of the ribs are often as solid as the ribs themselves; why oftentimes many vertebræ united form a more or less considerable continuous mass. I would observe however that the arteries, which have so great a tendency to ossification, are not so evidently gelatinous as many other substances which ossify much less easily, as the tendons for example.
Nothing is easier after what has been said upon the osseous nutrition, than to understand the formation of the callus. We know that it has three periods, 1st, the development of the fleshy granulations; 2d, their change into cartilage; 3d, the change of this cartilage into bone. This triple phenomenon takes place in a space of time that varies according to the age, the fracture, the kind of bone, &c. but which is in general longer than that of the other cicatrices.
The development of fleshy granulations is a phenomenon common to every species of organ which has experienced a solution of continuity and whose divided edges are not in immediate contact. Here these granulations arise from every part of the divided surface, from the periosteum, the compact texture and that of the cells, the last especially. Those of one side unite to those of the opposite. Thus far the osseous cicatrix does not differ from that of the other parts. This state corresponds with the mucous state of natural ossification. As the fleshy fibres are but the extension of the nutritive parenchyma, they have its vital forces; their organic sensibility follows the same laws as in ordinary nutrition; at first it is in relation with gelatine; this is then exhaled; then commences the cartilaginous state; then the osseous cicatrix takes a peculiar character, which distinguishes it from that of the other organs.
At the end of a longer time, the organic sensibility increases in the parenchyma of cicatrization which the fleshy granulations form; then these become in relation with the calcareous substance which comes to the bone, and which they had until then repelled; they admit it then, as well as the red portion of the blood which always precedes it in every species of ossification.
Hence we see that the callus is cellular and vascular in the first period; that in the second it contains cellular texture and vessels, with gelatine; that in the third, it has cellular texture, vessels, and gelatine, with calcareous substance.
It has not the regular forms of the sound bone, because the parenchyma of cicatrization arising irregularly upon the osseous surfaces, the exhalation and absorption of gelatine cannot be made in a precise and regular manner. The callus is so much the larger in proportion to the separation of the ends of the bone, because the fleshy granulations having had more space to go over in order to meet, are more extensive, and consequently have absorbed more nutritive substance.
If the constant motion of the fractured ends prevents on each side the granulations, or what is the same thing, the two parenchymas of cicatrization from uniting, then, notwithstanding the exhalation of the nutritive substances in each of them, the bone does not unite, and hence the preternatural articulations.
Callus is formed with difficulty when the ends divided and laid bare, suppurate with the neighbouring parts, as happens in compound fractures, because the formation of pus expends the nutritive substances destined to repair the fracture. The further considerations upon this singular production belong to pathology.
I have not exposed in this chapter the ideas of the ancients, who thought that the bones were formed by the hardening of an osseous juice, the existence of which there is nothing to demonstrate; nor those of Haller, who imagined that the heart hollowed out arterial channels in the osseous substance by its own impulse, and hardened this substance by the pulsation of the arteries; nor those of Duhamel, who made every thing depend upon the periosteum; I refer to various works that have a thousand times refuted these opinions.
Without refuting any one in particular, I would remark that they have one fundamental error, viz. that of considering osseous nutrition in an insulated manner, of not presenting it as a division of general nutrition, of admitting for its explanation reasonings only applicable to the bones, and which are not derived as consequences from those which serve to establish the nutrition of all the organs. Let us never lose sight of this essential principle, upon which rest all the phenomena of the economy, viz. that over a multitude of effects, a very small number of causes only presides. Let us mistrust every explanation which is partial and mutilated, which circumscribes the resources of nature according to the limits of our weak understandings.
The teeth, differing in part by their texture, from the other bones, have also a peculiar mode of nutrition which we shall now examine. But as the knowledge of this supposes that of the general structure of the teeth, it is proper to explain here that structure, referring their description to the examination of the bones of the face.
The teeth are formed by two substances, one external, of a peculiar nature, called enamel, the other internal, which is the common base of it, and the texture of which is the same as that of the other bones. They have besides a cavity which contains a spongy substance, as yet but little known.
The enamel of the tooth is only seen around the crown; some anatomists have thought that it extended a little upon the root, an opinion founded no doubt upon the extreme whiteness that the root often has in detached teeth, and which makes it impossible to distinguish the line of demarcation. But a very simple experiment proves this demarcation; it consists in macerating the tooth in diluted nitric acid. The acid immediately attacks both the root and the crown which it softens; but the first becomes yellow like almost all animal substances exposed to its action, whilst the other preserves its colour, and even becomes whiter. This experiment also proves that their respective natures are essentially different.
The enamel, thick on the top of the crown, grows thinner towards the root, an arrangement required by its use, which is to defend the tooth, to support principally the efforts of mastication, which are made especially upon the top of the crown.
This substance hard, compact, particularly when it has remained a long time in the air, acted upon with difficulty by the file, is composed of very close fibres, the direction of which cannot be traced. The medullary oil does not appear to penetrate it; it does not burn, but breaks by the action of fire, and is thus separated from the other substance, which, exposed to heat, at first becomes black, then burns like the other bones and gives out the same odour.
Is the enamel organized, or is it only a fluid which, oozing at first from the external surface of the tooth, afterwards becomes there hardened and concrete? This question is not I think easy to be resolved. The enamel has in fact attributes which seem equally favourable to both these opinions. On the one hand it is sensible, like every thing that is organized; it gives us, much more evidently than the hair or the nails, the sensation of bodies which strike it. The diluted acids, the vegetable especially, raise its sensibility so much, that the least touch becomes very painful a long time after their use. The teeth are then, as we call it, on edge. On the other hand the enamel has many characters that seem to denote a want of organization. 1st. It never inflames, or becomes the seat of any tumour, or any alteration which softens its texture; it never experiences any alteration, which by raising its life, renders it more sensible than in a natural state, as happens to the hair, for example, which ordinarily insensible, has a very great vital activity in the plica polonica. In fact we often judge of the vitality of organs more by their morbid alterations, than by their natural state. 2d. It appears that there does not take place in the enamel alternate exhalation and absorption of nutritive matters, or at least if it does, it is not sensible. Rubbing wears away this substance, which is never replaced; this is remarkable in old people, and in those who are in the habit of often striking their teeth together. We know that we file the enamel like an inorganic body, and that it is not reproduced, whilst the hair and the nails evidently grow after being cut. File the extremity of a long bone after amputation; fleshy granulations will soon grow upon the filed surface; the action of the instrument will be a stimulus which will develop the vital phenomena.
The osseous portion of the tooth composes the whole of the root and the interior of the crown; it is formed by the compact texture, very dense, having great resemblance to that of stone. It has none of the texture of the cells. Its fibres, very close to each other, have various directions, very difficult to trace, but which in general follow that of the roots; it is necessary, in order to see this direction perfectly, to soften the teeth in an acid.
Each tooth has a cavity situated in the crown, of the same form as the crown, diminishing in diameter as we advance in age, communicating externally by small canals, the number of which is equal to that of the distinct roots of the tooth, and which open at the end of these roots. This cavity is lined by a very delicate membrane on which the vessels ramify, and which, with its opposite face, covers the marrow.
This is a spongy substance which appears to be formed by the interlacing of the vessels and nerves belonging to each tooth, but the nature of which is not yet well understood; we know only that it has a very great animal sensibility equal to that of the medullary organ. This is proved, 1st, by the pains of carious teeth in which the marrow is bare, and which are, as we know, extremely acute; 2d, by the introduction of a probe into the opening occasioned by caries, this produces no pain until it comes to the marrow, and then it is extreme; 3d, by opening a socket of a very young animal that has not yet cut its teeth. At this age the marrow is very considerable and the tooth being small in proportion, it is easy to raise the tooth without injuring it, because it has as yet no root and the opening at the base of the crown is very large. The tooth being raised and the marrow thus laid bare, if it is irritated in any way the animal gives signs of the most acute pain. I have often made this experiment, always easily done, on account of the want of thickness of the osseous layers which then form the sockets.
The teeth have remarkable sympathies, which extend not only to the solid part, but also to the marrow. As this is much greater in proportion in the early ages, as it is almost the predominant part of the tooth, these sympathies are then more numerous and evident. In these sympathies, sometimes the animal and sometimes the organic properties are brought into action.
The sympathies of animal sensibility are evident in those pains of which the teeth become the seat from the action of cold or moisture upon the cutaneous system; in those produced in the face and the head by the caries of a tooth. Fauchart relates a case of obstinate hemicrania, which was immediately removed by the extraction of a tooth. The sensibility of the ear and the eyes is changed in some violent cases of tooth ache. The animal contractility is also brought into action in the sympathies of the teeth; nothing is more frequent in dentition, than convulsions of the voluntary muscles. Tissot speaks of a spasm of the muscles of the jaw, which was cured by the extraction of two carious teeth, and of a convulsion in the muscles of the neck that occasioned death, the primitive source of which was in a decayed tooth.
The organic sympathies are not less often produced by affections of the teeth. Spasmodic vomiting, diarrhœa, frequency of the pulse, oftentimes involuntary evacuation of urine, phenomena, over which the sensible organic contractility of the stomach, the intestines, the bladder and the heart presides, are the frequent effects of dentition and violent pains of the teeth, especially of the first. The insensible organic contractility, and the organic sensibility are brought sympathetically into action in the enlargements of the parotid gland, in the general swelling of the face, in the increased secretion of saliva and sometimes in the erysipelatous inflammations which take place from an acute affection of the teeth.
The sympathies of the teeth often take place between the two corresponding teeth of the same row or of the two rows. My first upper molar tooth of the left side is a little carious; from time to time it gives me pain, then invariably the first molar tooth of the right side becomes as painful, though it is sound. There are other cases in which a tooth being painful below, sympathetic pains are felt in that which is above, and vice versa.
The structure of the teeth having been explained, let us see how their different substances are developed. This subject of osseous nutrition does not appear to me to have been clearly illustrated by any author. I shall attempt to explain it better. There are two dentitions, one is provisional and limited to the first age, the other belongs to the whole life; each should be considered before, during, and after the cutting of the teeth.
The phenomena of dentition before the period of cutting are these; the jaws of the fœtus are closed the whole length of their upper edge; they appear to be homogeneous at first view; but examined in their interior, they exhibit a row of small membranous follicles, separated by delicate partitions, disposed like the teeth of which they are to serve as the germ, and having the following arrangement.
The membrane which serves as a covering to the follicle forms a sac without an opening, which lines at first all the parietes of the socket, to which it is attached by elongations. At the place where the vessels and nerves enter, this sac leaves the socket, becomes detached, is folded into the form of a canal which accompanies the vascular and nervous bundle, and afterwards spreads out upon the marrow of the tooth which is the termination of the bundle.
It follows from this that this membrane has the general conformation of the serous membranes, in the shape of some kinds of night-caps. It has two portions, the one attached and lining the socket, the other loose and covering the marrow, as for example, the pleura has a costal and a pulmonary portion. The marrow and the vessels, though contained in its duplicature, are in truth found without the cavity, which is lubricated by a simple exhalation. I have found that this exhalation was like that of the serous membranes, essentially of an albuminous nature; the action of the nitric acid, that of alkohol and of fire incontestably prove it. Subjected to the action of one of these agents, especially the first, the membrane whitens immediately. The layer of albumen which covers it becomes concrete and coagulated, as when we make a similar experiment upon a serous surface.
The marrow, very considerable at this period, is found suspended, like a bunch of grapes, from the extremity of the vessels and the nerves.
It is upon the medullary portion of the membrane of the follicle, and upon the surface of its loose extremity, that the first osseous point is developed; it soon extends, and takes precisely the form of the top of the crown, which it is afterwards to form, that is to say, that it is quadrilateral in the molar teeth, pointed in the canine, and wedge shaped in the incisors. Developed at first nearest the gums, it extends afterwards along the vascular and nervous stem, it is moulded upon it as it approaches the part of the alveolus where it enters; so that it exhibits on this side a concave surface which embraces the pulpy portion of the membrane, and adheres by several vascular elongations; and as this portion is loose, the first rudiment of the tooth floats also in the cavity of the membrane, as we can see very well by cutting the alveolar portion of this membrane, after having destroyed the corresponding part of the alveolus.
The following consequences result from this kind of development; 1st. The crown is first formed, and the root is not produced but as the ossification in length advances upon the portion of membrane lining the vascular and nervous bundle. 2d. As all the vessels that come to the tooth enter at its internal surface, and as the external is entirely free in the cavity of the membrane, the ossification in thickness is made especially at the expense of the internal cavity which is constantly contracting, as well as the marrow, an arrangement, the reverse of that of the other bones, the ossification of which commences at a point placed in the centre of the cartilage, and which at first solid in the middle, afterwards become hollow for the medullary cavities and those of the cells, which are always enlarging. 3d. After the ossification of the tooth, the portion of the membrane of the follicle which lined the alveolus, remains the same, whilst that its portion corresponding with the marrow, originally free at the other side, becomes adherent on this side to the whole dental cavity which it lines, of which it forms the membrane noticed above in the article on the structure of the teeth, and which is thus found between the marrow and the osseous substance. 4th. The marrow of the tooth is the part first formed, and the most considerable in the first periods of life. It appears that the osseous substance is next formed, and that the enamel afterwards arises on the exterior of this. I have not yet been able to make evident the manner of its origin.
It is difficult to ascertain at what period the membraneous follicle is formed; that of the first ossification appears to be from the fourth to the fifth month. At the time of birth, we find the twenty teeth of the first dentition already advanced; the whole crown is formed; the beginning of the root appears also in the form of a broad tube, with extremely delicate parietes, and which is constantly becoming longer and thicker; when it reaches the bottom of the socket, the tooth immediately appears externally as this is too narrow to contain it.
The number of teeth, less in the first than in the second dentition, gives a peculiar form to the jaws of the fœtus and the infant, especially to the lower one, which is less elongated in front, and consequently wider in proportion than in the adult, in whom in order to receive all the teeth, the alveolar border must necessarily be more extended. This arrangement of the lower jaw has a great influence in the expression of the physiognomy.
The following phenomena take place about the sixth or seventh month after birth, very rarely sooner, still more rarely before birth, though there are examples of this, as is proved by the history of Louis XIV. At first the two small incisor teeth of the lower jaw appear, sometimes together, sometimes separately; soon after the corresponding incisors of the superior jaw. A month or two later, the four other incisors are cut. At the end of the first year, the four canine teeth usually appear. At the end of the second, or often later, two molar are cut in each jaw and two others soon follow. Each cutting almost always begins in the lower jaw. At the age of four years, four and a half, sometimes five or six, always at a very uncertain period, there appear below two other molars and then two above, which complete the number of twenty-four teeth forming the first dentition; all these except the last four fall out and are replaced by new ones.
The following is the mechanism of this first dentition; the ossification extending constantly towards the root, the tooth can no longer be contained in the socket; it pierces the alveolar portion of the membrane and the mucous membrane of the mouth and an intermediate medullary texture that separates them, with much ease, as this triple layer gradually becomes thinner as the cutting approaches. Is this phenomenon owing only to the mechanical pressure of the tooth? I think that there is another cause; for observe that here the membranes are very little raised before rupturing; whilst that in polypi and other tumours that sometimes arise under the membrane of the gums, it is infinitely more stretched, still it does not break, but is only lifted up. The mechanism of the opening of the gums is not more known than the principle of the severe accidents which are sometimes connected with it. The sac which formed the original membrane of the follicle being thus open, its portion which lines the socket unites to the membrane of the mouth, becomes continuous with it and at the same time adheres intimately to the neck of the tooth; and as during the development of the root, the internal face of this membranous portion, at first loose as we have seen, has gradually contracted adhesions with it, it follows that this root is found fastened between the alveolar portion which lines its exterior, and the medullary portion which covers the interior; it is this which gives it solidity. As the adhesions of the membrane increase, we can less easily distinguish it. It is rare that in the first dentition the formation of the root is finished as completely as in the second; its internal cavity remains also very broad, and the marrow is more developed.
It is necessary, as in the preceding case, to distinguish the nutritive phenomena into those which take place before, during and after the cutting. Before the cutting, we observe by opening the jaw, a row of dental follicles, corresponding to the row of teeth already formed, situated below or at the side, and separated from them by little partitions, the thickness of which is found greater in proportion as it is examined nearer infancy.
These follicles have precisely the same arrangement as those of the first dentition; like them they form sacs without an opening, the alveolar portion of which is attached, and the loose medullary portion is covered on its surface with the first osseous layers for the crown. The manner of growth is the same; that is to say, it takes place from the exterior to the interior, the reverse of the other bones; an arrangement, which gives the part of the tooth immediately in contact with foreign bodies, being the first formed, time to acquire the solidity necessary for its functions.
As the second teeth grow, their vascular system becomes greater, and that of the old ones diminishes; which arises from this, that the sensibility weakened in the last, draws to them no more blood, whilst being raised in the others, it attracts it powerfully. We observe also that the partition of the sockets diminishes in thickness, and that the root of the first is destroyed. This double phenomenon does not appear to be owing to the pressure exerted by the new tooth, as then the root would spread and become flat only; or if it experienced a real destruction, we should find the remains of it, which we never do. It is then probable that, it is by the absorption of the phosphate of lime, that the partition and root disappear, nearly as we have said the internal cavities of the cartilaginous bones are formed.
We see from this, that the ossification of the roots of the first teeth is of short duration; it begins the last and terminates the first. When it is of but little extent, the teeth become loose, from the want of insertion. The disappearance of the partitions increases it. It is at about the age of six or seven years that the shedding of them commences; this takes place in the order in which they were cut, that is to say, first the incisors, then the canine, and then the molars. Observe that the last, which appeared at four years of age, are not renewed.
During the cutting of the second teeth, we observe them come out in the same order as those with which they correspond are detached. 1st. The eight incisors. 2d. The four canine appear. 3d. In the place of the first molar, two new ones are cut; these afterwards have the name of small molars. 4th. The second molar remains, as we have just said; it is the first of the great ones. 5th. At eight or nine years of age, two other molars appear in each jaw. 6th. Finally, at eighteen, twenty, or thirty years, and sometimes later, a third molar is cut; this is called the dens sapientiæ.
There is then in each jaw sixteen teeth, of which four are incisors, two canine, two small molars, and three large ones.
Sometimes the second teeth while they are forming, instead of appropriating to themselves the nutritive substance of the roots of the first and their partition, leave them untouched; neither are destroyed; and the second teeth are cut at the side of the first which remain in their places. When this phenomenon happens, it is usually only to a single tooth; sometimes, however, it happens to many and even all, and then there is a double row. In general, the second teeth have a tendency to go out at the side of the gums. When very obliquely placed, by a defect of conformation, their crown leans forward or backward; instead of piercing the jaw, they remain always buried in the sockets.
After being cut, the teeth evidently grow, 1st, in length; 2d, in thickness. It is only the root that is enlarged in the first direction; the crown preserves always the same dimensions; and if in old people it appears longer, it is only because the gums have retracted; a phenomenon which besides we very often observe in persons who have become thin, in those who have made use of mercury, &c.
The growth in the second direction is not made without, but only within; the canal of the root and the cavity of the body are constantly contracting, and are finally obliterated. Then the tooth receiving no longer the blood or the influence of the nerves, dies and falls out. But this death appears also to be hastened by the accumulation of osseous substance, of a very great quantity of the phosphate of lime, which predominates there so much over the gelatine, that the principle of life is entirely destroyed, so that in this respect, the shedding of the teeth exhibits a phenomenon analogous to that of the shedding of the horns of the herbivorous animals, of the calcareous shell of the crustaceous ones, &c.
Why has nature given to the life of the teeth a shorter term than to that of the other bones, which do not cease to exist but with the other organs, whilst the teeth die a long time before? Is it because the stomach becoming weak with age, the animals are thence compelled to nourish themselves in their old age, with soft substances, adapted to the languid state of the gastric forces? Undoubtedly in man, a thousand causes, arising especially from the nature of the aliments, their degree of heat and cold, the manner in which they are cooked, their infinitely various qualities, hasten the natural period of the death and the fall of the teeth, because by incessantly exciting and stimulating these organs, they keep them in a state of constant activity, which exhausts their life sooner than it otherwise would have been. Thus a thousand causes arising from society, make the term of the general life much shorter than that fixed by nature. But in general in all animals, the death of the teeth precedes that of the other organs, though they are not under the influence of society, and they masticate only aliments destined by nature to be in contact with their teeth.