Correspondent	Is immorality, in your opinion, due to the presence of low whites, or because of the Indian himself?	Which of the two classes are in the better condition, the mixed-blood or full-blood Indian?	Are the white people crowding your Indians and taking advantage of them?	Do the Indians who are trained near their homes do better than Indians who are educated at a distance and return?	Is the population increasing or decreasing?	Are white men marrying Indian women in order to secure property?	Is the Government properly protecting the Indians?
Alaska
No. 1 Nolato	Both, former about five times as much as latter.	Not much difference.	Yes, to some extent, but Indian retaliates.	There is no difference.	Slightly decreasing.	No.	Bureau of Education, yes; laws very bad.
No. 2 St. Michaels	Low whites.			Better, (Yes).	Slightly increasing.
No. 3	Low whites.	Both in poor shape.	Not much.		Decreasing.		Not enough protecting.
Arizona
No. 1 Ft. Defiance	Indian himself.	Mixed-bloods.	A little off the reservation.	Yes.	Slightly increasing.	No.	No.
No. 2 Parker	Due to old customs.	Few mixed-bloods same condition.	They are not.	Yes.	Decreasing among the full-bloods.	No.	It is.
No. 3 Phoenix
No. 4 Sacaton	Cases due to Indian.	Few mixed-bloods, these not impr’v’d.	Yes, in regard to water.	Yes.	Slight increase, I think.	No.	Yes, but hampered by law and politics.
No. 5 St. Michaels	Due to Indian, because of customs.	Mixed-bloods, only a few, however.	Yes, off the reservation.	Yes.	Slightly increasing.	No.	No.
No. 6 Tucson	To Indians.	Very few mixed-bloods.	Among the Papagos but not the Pimas.	I think so.	Increasing.	No.	Not as regards land and water.
No. 7	Low whites.	No mixed bloods.	Yes, if possible.	Most assuredly.	Increasing.	Law forbids inter-marriages.	No.
California
No. 1 Banning	Little immorality.	Mixed-bloods.	No.	About same.	Just holding its own.	No.	Yes.
No. 2 Campo	Indian himself.	Few mixed-bloods, these are better.	No.	About same.	Slowly decreasing.	No.	Yes.
No. 3 Covelo	Both.	Mixed-bloods.	Not crowding, but taking advantage of necessities.	Yes.	About same.	Only reprobates.	Yes.
No. 4 El Cujon	Very few cases.		No.	Few of them.	Increasing.	No.	Yes.
No. 5 Greenville	To both.	The mixed-bloods.	To no great extent.	No.	Holding its own.	No.	Yes.
No. 6 Likely	Low whites.	Full-bloods.	No.	Yes.	Decreasing.	No.	No.
No. 7 Pala	Little immorality.	Very few full-bloods here.	No.	Yes, much better.	Very slight increase.	No.	Yes, all it can.
No. 8 Ukiah				Yes.			No.
No. 9 Yuma, Yuma	Indian himself.	Very few mixed-bloods here.	No.	Same.	Same.	No.	Yes.
No. 10 N. California	Low whites.	Full-bloods.	No.		Seems to be on the increase now.	No.	Government has done very little.
Colorado
No. 1 Navaho Springs	No whites here.	No mixed-bloods here.	No.	Yes.	Increasing three percent per year.	No.	Yes.
No. Dakota
No. 1 Elbowoods	Indian himself.	No difference.	No not much.	No difference noted.	Slightly increasing.	No.	More energy needed.
No. 2 Elbowoods	Indian himself.	Full bloods.	No.	Yes.	Decreasing.	Law forbids it.	Yes.
No. 3 Ft. Yates	Low whites and mixed-bloods.	Mixed-bloods financially.	No.	Home training seems best.	Increasing.	Very seldom.	Intentions good, officials bad.
No. 4 Standing Rock	To Government, because Indian cannot marry until eighteen.	Full-bloods.	Yes.	Yes.	Increasing.	No.	No.
So. Dakota
No. 1 Cheyenne	Both.	Mixed-bloods.	Yes.	Yes.	Holding its own.	Yes.
No. 2 Crow Creek	Indian nature (himself).	Mixed-bloods.	No.	Little difference.	Vacillating.	No.	Yes.
No. 3 Flandreau		Mixed-bloods a little.	No.			No.	What is necessary.
No. 4 Greenwood	Both.	Mixed-bloods.	Yes.	Yes.	Increasing.	No.	Yes.
No. 5 McLaughlin	Both.	Mixed, materially, otherwise full-blood.	Only a large cattle company.	Yes.	Slight increase.	Very few.	No, in many respects.
No. 6 Mission	Low whites.	Same.	Often.	Yes.		Not often.	Failure.
No. 7 Oahe	Low whites.	Not much difference.	Not to any extent.	Yes.	Increasing.	Not to any extent.	Yes.
No. 8 Pine Ridge	Indian (Mixed-blood).	Mixed-blood.	No.	Yes.	Increasing.	Some.	Yes .
No. 9 Pine Ridge	Low whites.	Mixed-blood.	No.	Yes.	Mixed-bloods increasing, full-bloods decreasing.	Some.
No. 10 Rosebud	Both.	Both in some respects.	No.	Yes.	Increasing 1%.	Some.	In some ways.
No. 11 Rosebud Ag.	Indian himself.	Mixed-blood.	Not much.	Yes.	4500 to 5490.		Yes.
No. 12 Sisseton	Indian himself.	Hard to say, full-blood in health.	Yes, when they can.	Cannot tell.	Increasing slowly.	Few.	Indians say no.
No. 13 Sisseton	Low whites.	Little difference.	Some try to.	Yes.	Increasing.	Some cases.	Indians are citizens.
No. 13 Sisseton	Indian mostly.	Little difference.	When they can.	Little difference. full-bloods decreasing.	Mixed-bloods increasing, cases.	Not now, few.	To some extent.
No. 15 St. Francis		Mixed-blood.	Some.	Yes.	Slight increase.		Dealt honestly with them.
Idaho
No. 1 Ft. Hall	Indian on sex, Low whites on liquor.	Not much difference.	No but would like to.	Yes.	Decreasing.	Not many.	Yes.
No. 2 Ft. Lapwai	Low whites.	Full-bloods.	Yes.	Yes.	Don’t know.	Rarely.	Yes and No.
No. 3 Lapwai	Indian customs.	Mixed-bloods.	Not generally.	Yes.	Increase slightly.	No.	Yes, here.
No. 4 Slickpoo	Both.	Mixed-bloods little better.	Yes, as much as they can.	Much better.	Decreasing.	A few.	Not as regards morality and religion.
Iowa
No. 1 Toledo	They keep aloof from whites. Indians themselves.	No noticeable difference.	Whites encourage them, but few prey on them. No.		Increasing slowly.	No.
Kansas
No. 1 Baxter Springs	Indian himself.	Mixed-bloods.	When they get a chance.	Yes.	Decreasing.	No.	Yes.
No. 2 Powhattan	Indian himself.	Mixed-bloods, except morally.	Yes.	No.	Increasing some.	No. (Some Indians marry low white women.)	Yes, could be improved.
Minnesota
No. 1 Winnebago	Low whites.	Not much difference.	Yes, to a great extent.	Yes.	Stationary.	Not much now.	Indians dissatisfied.
No. 2 Beaulieu	Low whites.			Yes.		75% increase.
No. 3 Cass Lake	White man 90%.	Full-blood.	Yes.	Yes.	Full-blood decreasing, Mixed-blood increasing.		Government ineffective.
No. 4 Cloquet	Low whites.	Mixed-blood financially; full-blood morally.	No.	Yes.	Full-blood decreasing, mixed-bloods on the increase.	Yes, but not many.	Yes.
Montana
No. 1 Browning	Low whites.	Mixed-blood as a rule.	No whites here.	Cannot say.	Increasing for two years.	Few.	Yes.
No. 2 Crow Ag.	Indian nature.	Full-blood, but little difference.	No.	No difference.	Slowly decreasing.	Two, but do not know the incentive.	Yes, all possible.
No. 3 Poplar	Early low whites.	Mixed-blood.	Few whites here.	Yes.	Increasing, Indian blood.	Few cases.	Yes.
No. 4 Jocko	Indian himself.	Mixed-blood.	Some trying to.	Yes.	Increasing slightly.	Not to any extent.	Yes, all it can.
No. 5 Lame Deer	What little there is, is due to Indian.	Both the same.	No.	Same.	Standstill.	Three marriages to whites in eight years.	Yes.
No. 6 Lodge Grass	Low whites helped.		No.	No.	Slight increase.	Very few whites marry Indians.	Yes, but system wrong.
No. 7 St. Ignatius	Low whites.	Mixed-bloods materially, full-bloods morally.	Trying to.	Yes.	Full-bloods decreasing, but the population increasing.	Yes.	To some extent.
No. 8 Wolf Point	Both.	Full-bloods.	No.	Yes.	Increasing.	No.	Trying to.
Nebraska
No. 1 Santee	Indian himself.	Mixed-bloods.	No, not to any extent.	Yes.	Standstill.	No.	Yes.
No. 2 Santee	Both.	Full-bloods generally.	Yes, when they can.	Yes.	Increasing.	No.	Not in some cases.
Nevada
No. 1 Nixon	No whites here.	Full-bloods.	No.	Yes.	Increasing.	No.	Yes.
No. 2 Schurz	Both.	Full-bloods.	Not on the reservation.	Yes.	Decreasing.	No.	Yes, on reservation.
New Mexico
No. 1 Albuquerque	Indian himself.	Mixed-bloods.	A certain class does.	No.	Increasing.	No.	Yes.
No. 2 Gallup	Indian himself.	No mixed-bloods.	No.	No.	Standstill.	No.	Yes.
Oklahoma
No. 1 Anadarko	Both.	Same.	Some whites are.	Same.	Increasing.	In a few cases.	Yes and No.
No. 2 Anadarko	Largely to low whites.	Same.	Yes, when they can.	Yes, as a rule.	Increasing slightly.	Not to any extent.
No. 3 Anadarko	Indian himself.	Full-bloods.	No.	Yes.	Increasing.	A few.	Everything it can do.
No. 4 Atoka	To low whites.	Mixed-bloods.	Yes.	No.	Full-bloods decreasing.	Not much now.	No.
No. 5 Bacone	Both, mostly to whites.		Very much.	Yes.		Yes.	Partially so.
No. 6 Carnegie	Low whites.	Mixed-bloods.	Yes.	Yes.	Increasing.	Some, few.	No.
No. 7 Checotah	Low whites.	Mixed-bloods.	Yes.	No difference.	Full-bloods decreasing.	Not now.	Trying to.
No. 8 Darlington	Low whites.	Full-bloods, exceptions favor mixed.	No.	Cannot say.	Increasing slightly.	Not here.	Not doing all it can, or should.
No. 9 Durant	Both.	Mixed-bloods.	Many try to.	No.	Full-bloods decreasing, mixed increasing.	Not as much now.	Doing a great deal.
No. 10 Durant	Low whites.	Mixed-bloods.	Yes.	No difference.	Decreasing.	Yes, low whites are.	Do not think so.
No. 11 Eufaula	Early low whites, now Indian.	Mixed-bloods.	Yes.		Full bloods decreasing.	Yes.	It is now.
No. 12 Hobart	Both.		When they can.	Yes.	Increasing.		As far as Indian will let it.
No. 13 Holdenville	Low whites.	Mixed-bloods.	Yes.	I don’t know.	Decreasing.	Not now.	No.
No. 14 Hugo	Both.	Mixed-bloods.	When they can.	Same.	Decreasing.	Yes.	Government does not understand.
No. 15 Hugo	Low whites.	Mixed-bloods.	Yes.	Yes.	Decreasing.	Not as much now.	Yes, but it makes mistakes.
No. 16 Lawton	Low whites.	Little difference.	A certain class do.	Yes.	Increasing 15% in ten years.	A few have.	Yes.
No. 17 Mountain View	Both.	No difference.	Many do.	No difference.	Increase.	No.	As well as Indian lets it.
No. 18 Muskogee	Indian himself.	Mixed-bloods.	Yes.	No.		Not as a rule.	Making a conscientious effort.
No. 19 Pawhuska	Low whites.	Full-bloods.	Yes.	Yes.	Full-bloods decreasing, population increasing.	Nearly every time.	All it can.
No. 20 Pawhuska	Low whites and colored people.	Mixed-bloods.	Yes.	Yes.	Increasing.	Yes.	As far as possible.
No. 21 Sapulpa	Both.	Full-bloods.	Yes.	Not if those trained away are well advanced.		Yes.
No. 22 Shawnee	Both.	Mixed-bloods.	Some try to.	Young children do.	Increasing.		Doing efficient work.
No. 23 Watanga	Early whites.	Same.	Some try to.	No difference.	Mixed-bloods increased. Full-bloods, standstill.	Two cases in 15 years.	All it can.
No. 24 White Eagle	Both.	Same.	They cannot.	Yes.	Increase.	No.	Yes, but needs changes.
No. 25 Wyandotte	Low whites.	Same.	All they can.	No difference.	Slight increase.	Not markedly true.	All it can.
Oregon
No. 1 Klamath	Indian himself.	Mixed-blood.	No.	I think so.	Standstill.	Not yet.	I think so.
No. 2 Pendleton					Full-blood decreasing, mixed-blood increasing.	No.	Yes.
No. 3 Roseburg	Both.	Mixed-blood.	Yes.	Yes.		Yes.	Yes.
No. 4 Warm Sp.	Indian (no whites here.)	Same.	Some do.	No.	Decreasing.	No.	Yes.
Utah
No. 1 Salt Lake City.
Washington
No. 1 Bellingham	No low whites here.	Same.	They cannot.	Yes.	Increasing.	None.	Yes, could be improved.
No. 2 Bellingham	Low whites.	Same.	No, except gamblers.	I think so.	Standstill.	They try.	Yes, but need police.
No. 3 Marysville		Materially the mixed-bloods. Morally the full-bloods.	Few.		Slowly decreasing.	Very few.	Yes, at least theoretically.
No. 4 Neah Bay	Indian nature.	All mixed-blood.	No, they assist them.	In my opinion, no.	Some tribes increase, others decrease.	No.	Yes.
No. 5 No. Yakima	Low whites and colored people.	Mixed-blood.	Yes, in every way possible.	Do not know.	Holding own.	Yes.	No.
No. 6 Nespelem	Low whites.	Mixed-blood.	Yes, in places.	Yes, as a rule.	Mixed-bloods increasing. Full-bloods decreasing.	Not very much.	Doing very well.
No. 7 St. Mary’s	Whiskey.	About the same.	No.	I think so.	About the same.	They try.	Yes. Lack of police is bad.
No. 8 Tacoma		Mixed, temporally; full-blood otherwise.	As soon as they can.	Little difference.	Increasing.	Hardly ever.	Only on the reservation.
No. 9 Tulalip	Both.	Mixed-blood.	When they can.	Yes.	Increasing slightly.	Not to any extent.	Not sure it has.
No. 10 Wheeler	Low whites.	Full-blood.	Yes.	Yes.		Rare.	Yes and no.
Wisconsin
No. 1 Adanah	Low whites.	All mixed-bloods.	No.	Yes.	Standing still.	Now and then.	Too much red tape.
No. 2 Ashland	Both.	Mixed-bloods.	No.	Yes.	Decreasing.	No.	Yes.
No. 3 Bayfield	Low whites mostly.	Full-bloods, morally. Mixed financially and intellectually.	Treated as whites.	About same.	Full-bloods decreasing. Population increasing.	Occasionally.	Yes.
No. 4 Carter	Very little immorality.	Only full-bloods.	To a small degree.	None have gone away.	Increasing.	No inter-marriages.	Done a great deal.
No. 5 Kesbena	Both.	Mixed-bloods.	No whites here.	Yes.	Small increase.	No.
No. 6 Kesbena	Both.	Full-bloods.	Traders, outside, do.	Same.	Increasing.	Not yet.	Here it is.
No. 7 Tomah	Only to whites when they sell liquor.	What few mixed-breeds we have are better.	Not here.	Yes, perhaps.	Increased a little.	Indians have no property.	Yes. Mistakes are made.
New York
No. 1 Gowanda	Indian himself.	No full-bloods.	Only hotels and saloons.	No.		No.	Not in some cases.