| § 1. | A definition at the commencement of a subject must be provisional | 1 |
| 2. | Is logic the art and science of reasoning? | 2 |
| 3. | Or the art and science of the pursuit of truth? | 3 |
| 4. | Logic is concerned with inferences, not with intuitive truths | 5 |
| 5. | Relation of logic to the other sciences | 8 |
| 6. | Its utility, how shown | 10 |
| 7. | Definition of logic stated and illustrated | 11 |
|
BOOK
I.
OF NAMES AND PROPOSITIONS. |
||
|
Chapter
I. Of the Necessity of commencing with an Analysis of
Language.
|
||
| § 1. | Theory of names, why a necessary part of logic | 17 |
| 2. | First step in the analysis of Propositions | 18 |
| 3. | Names must be studied before Things | 21 |
|
Chapter
II. Of Names.
|
||
| § 1. | Names are names of things, not of our ideas | 23 |
| 2. | Words which are not names, but parts of names | 24 |
| 3. | General and Singular names | 26 |
| 4. | Concrete and Abstract | 29 |
| 5. | Connotative and Non-connotative | 31 |
| 6. | Positive and Negative | 42 |
| 7. | Relative and Absolute | 44 |
| 8. | Univocal and Æquivocal | 47 |
|
Chapter
III. Of the Things denoted by Names.
|
||
| § 1. | Necessity of an enumeration of Nameable Things. The Categories of Aristotle | 49 |
| 2. | Ambiguity of the most general names | 51 |
| 3. | Feelings, or states of consciousness | 54 |
| 4. | Feelings must be distinguished from their physical antecedents. Perceptions, what | 56 |
| 5. | Volitions, and Actions, what | 58 |
| 6. | Substance and Attribute | 59 |
| 7. | Body | 61 |
| 8. | Mind | 67 |
| 9. | Qualities | 69 |
| 10. | Relations | 72 |
| 11. | Resemblance | 74 |
| 12. | Quantity | 78 |
| 13. | All attributes of bodies are grounded on states of consciousness | 79 |
| 14. | So also all attributes of mind | 80 |
| 15. | Recapitulation | 81 |
|
Chapter
IV. Of Propositions.
|
||
| § 1. | Nature and office of the copula | 85 |
| 2. | Affirmative and Negative propositions | 87 |
| 3. | Simple and Complex | 89 |
| 4. | Universal, Particular, and Singular | 93 |
|
Chapter
V. Of the Import of Propositions.
|
||
| § 1. | Doctrine that a proposition is the expression of a relation between two ideas | 96 |
| 2. | Doctrine that it is the expression of a relation between the meanings of two names | 99 |
| 3. | Doctrine that it consists in referring something to, or excluding something from, a class | 103 |
| 4. | What it really is | 107 |
| 5. | It asserts (or denies) a sequence, a coexistence, a simple existence, a causation | 110 |
| 6. | —or a resemblance | 112 |
| 7. | Propositions of which the terms are abstract | 115 |
|
Chapter
VI. Of Propositions merely Verbal.
|
||
| § 1. | Essential and Accidental propositions | 119 |
| 2. | All essential propositions are identical propositions | 120 |
| 3. | Individuals have no essences | 124 |
| 4. | Real propositions, how distinguished from verbal | 126 |
| 5. | Two modes of representing the import of a Real proposition | 127 |
|
Chapter
VII. Of the Nature of Classification, and the Five
Predicables.
|
||
| § 1. | Classification, how connected with Naming | 129 |
| 2. | The Predicables, what | 131 |
| 3. | Genus and Species | 131 |
| 4. | Kinds have a real existence in nature | 134 |
| 5. | Differentia | 139 |
| 6. | Differentiæ for general purposes, and differentiæ for special or technical purposes | 141 |
| 7. | Proprium | 144 |
| 8. | Accidens | 146 |
|
Chapter
VIII. Of Definition.
|
||
| § 1. | A definition, what | 148 |
| 2. | Every name can be defined, whose meaning is susceptible of analysis | 150 |
| 3. | Complete, how distinguished from incomplete definitions | 152 |
| 4. | —and from descriptions | 154 |
| 5. | What are called definitions of Things, are definitions of Names with an implied assumption of the existence of Things corresponding to them | 157 |
| 6. | —even when such things do not in reality exist | 165 |
| 7. | Definitions, though of names only, must be grounded on knowledge of the corresponding Things | 167 |
|
BOOK
II.
OF REASONING. |
||
|
Chapter
I. Of Inference, or Reasoning, in general.
|
||
| § 1. | Retrospect of the preceding book | 175 |
| 2. | Inferences improperly so called | 177 |
| 3. | Inferences proper, distinguished into inductions and ratiocinations | 181 |
|
Chapter
II. Of Ratiocination, or Syllogism.
|
||
| § 1. | Analysis of the Syllogism | 184 |
| 2. | The dictum de omni not the foundation of reasoning, but a mere identical proposition | 191 |
| 3. | What is the really fundamental axiom of Ratiocination | 196 |
| 4. | The other form of the axiom | 199 |
|
Chapter
III. Of the Functions, and Logical Value, of the
Syllogism.
|
||
| § 1. | Is the syllogism a petitio principii? | 202 |
| 2. | Insufficiency of the common theory | 203 |
| 3. | All inference is from particulars to particulars | 205 |
| 4. | General propositions are a record of such inferences, and the rules of the syllogism are rules for the interpretation of the record | 214 |
| 5. | The syllogism not the type of reasoning, but a test of it | 218 |
| 6. | The true type, what | 222 |
| 7. | Relation between Induction and Deduction | 226 |
| 8. | Objections answered | 227 |
| 9. | Of Formal Logic, and its relation to the Logic of Truth | 231 |
|
Chapter
IV. Of Trains of Reasoning, and Deductive Sciences.
|
||
| § 1. | For what purpose trains of reasoning exist | 234 |
| 2. | A train of reasoning is a series of inductive inferences | 234 |
| 3. | —from particulars to particulars through marks of marks | 237 |
| 4. | Why there are deductive sciences | 240 |
| 5. | Why other sciences still remain experimental | 244 |
| 6. | Experimental sciences may become deductive by the progress of experiment | 246 |
| 7. | In what manner this usually takes place | 247 |
|
Chapter
V. Of Demonstration, and Necessary Truths.
|
||
| § 1. | The Theorems of geometry are necessary truths only in the sense of necessarily following from hypotheses | 251 |
| 2. | Those hypotheses are real facts with some of their circumstances exaggerated or omitted | 255 |
| 3. | Some of the first principles of geometry are axioms, and these are not hypothetical | 256 |
| 4. | —but are experimental truths | 258 |
| 5. | An objection answered | 261 |
| 6. | Dr. Whewell's opinions on axioms examined | 264 |
|
Chapter
VI. The same Subject continued.
|
||
| § 1. | All deductive sciences are inductive | 281 |
| 2. | The propositions of the science of number are not verbal, but generalizations from experience | 284 |
| 3. | In what sense hypothetical | 289 |
| 4. | The characteristic property of demonstrative science is to be hypothetical | 290 |
| 5. | Definition of demonstrative evidence | 292 |
|
Chapter
VII. Examination of some Opinions opposed to the
preceding doctrines.
|
||
| § 1. | Doctrine of the Universal Postulate | 294 |
| 2. | The test of inconceivability does not represent the aggregate of past experience | 296 |
| 3. | —nor is implied in every process of thought | 299 |
| 4. | Sir W. Hamilton's opinion on the Principles of Contradiction and Excluded Middle | 306 |
|
BOOK
III.
OF INDUCTION. |
||
|
Chapter
I. Preliminary Observations on Induction in general.
|
||
| § 1. | Importance of an Inductive Logic | 313 |
| 2. | The logic of science is also that of business and life | 314 |
|
Chapter
II. Of Inductions improperly so called.
|
||
| § 1. | Inductions distinguished from verbal transformations | 319 |
| 2. | —from inductions, falsely so called, in mathematics | 321 |
| 3. | —and from descriptions | 323 |
| 4. | Examination of Dr. Whewell's theory of Induction | 326 |
| 5. | Further illustration of the preceding remarks | 336 |
|
Chapter
III. On the Ground of Induction.
|
||
| § 1. | Axiom of the uniformity of the course of nature | 341 |
| 2. | Not true in every sense. Induction per enumerationem simplicem | 346 |
| 3. | The question of Inductive Logic stated | 348 |
|
Chapter
IV. Of Laws of Nature.
|
||
| § 1. | The general regularity in nature is a tissue of partial regularities, called laws | 351 |
| 2. | Scientific induction must be grounded on previous spontaneous inductions | 355 |
| 3. | Are there any inductions fitted to be a test of all others? | 357 |
|
Chapter
V. Of the Law of Universal Causation.
|
||
| § 1. | The universal law of successive phenomena is the Law of Causation | 360 |
| 2. | —i.e. the law that every consequent has an invariable antecedent | 363 |
| 3. | The cause of a phenomenon is the assemblage of its conditions | 365 |
| 4. | The distinction of agent and patient illusory | 373 |
| 5. | The cause is not the invariable antecedent, but the unconditional invariable antecedent | 375 |
| 6. | Can a cause be simultaneous with its effect? | 380 |
| 7. | Idea of a Permanent Cause, or original natural agent | 383 |
| 8. | Uniformities of coexistence between effects of different permanent causes, are not laws | 386 |
| 9. | Doctrine that volition is an efficient cause, examined | 387 |
|
Chapter
VI. Of the Composition of Causes.
|
||
| § 1. | Two modes of the conjunct action of causes, the mechanical and the chemical | 405 |
| 2. | The composition of causes the general rule; the other case exceptional | 408 |
| 3. | Are effects proportional to their causes? | 412 |
|
Chapter
VII. Of Observation and Experiment.
|
||
| § 1. | The first step of inductive inquiry is a mental analysis of complex phenomena into their elements | 414 |
| 2. | The next is an actual separation of those elements | 416 |
| 3. | Advantages of experiment over observation | 417 |
| 4. | Advantages of observation over experiment | 420 |
|
Chapter
VIII. Of the Four Methods of Experimental Inquiry.
|
||
| § 1. | Method of Agreement | 425 |
| 2. | Method of Difference | 428 |
| 3. | Mutual relation of these two methods | 429 |
| 4. | Joint Method of Agreement and Difference | 433 |
| 5. | Method of Residues | 436 |
| 6. | Method of Concomitant Variations | 437 |
| 7. | Limitations of this last method | 443 |
|
Chapter
IX. Miscellaneous Examples of the Four Methods.
|
||
| § 1. | Liebig's theory of metallic poisons | 449 |
| 2. | Theory of induced electricity | 453 |
| 3. | Dr. Wells' theory of dew | 457 |
| 4. | Dr. Brown-Séquard's theory of cadaveric rigidity | 465 |
| 5. | Examples of the Method of Residues | 471 |
| 6. | Dr. Whewell's objections to the Four Methods | 475 |
|
Chapter
X. Of Plurality of Causes; and of the Intermixture of
Effects.
|
||
| § 1. | One effect may have several causes | 482 |
| 2. | —which is the source of a characteristic imperfection of the Method of Agreement | 483 |
| 3. | Plurality of Causes, how ascertained | 487 |
| 4. | Concurrence of Causes which do not compound their effects | 489 |
| 5. | Difficulties of the investigation, when causes compound their effects | 494 |
| 6. | Three modes of investigating the laws of complex effects | 499 |
| 7. | The method of simple observation inapplicable | 500 |
| 8. | The purely experimental method inapplicable | 501 |
|
Chapter
XI. Of the Deductive Method.
|
||
| § 1. | First stage; ascertainment of the laws of the separate causes by direct induction | 507 |
| 2. | Second stage; ratiocination from the simple laws of the complex cases | 512 |
| 3. | Third stage; verification by specific experience | 514 |
|
Chapter
XII. Of the Explanation of Laws of Nature.
|
||
| § 1. | Explanation defined | 518 |
| 2. | First mode of explanation, by resolving the law of a complex effect into the laws of the concurrent causes and the fact of their coexistence | 518 |
| 3. | Second mode; by the detection of an intermediate link in the sequence | 519 |
| 4. | Laws are always resolved into laws more general than themselves | 520 |
| 5. | Third mode; the subsumption of less general laws under a more general one | 524 |
| 6. | What the explanation of a law of nature amounts to | 526 |
|
Chapter
XIII. Miscellaneous Examples of the Explanation of
Laws of Nature.
|
||
| § 1. | The general theories of the sciences | 529 |
| 2. | Examples from chemical speculations | 531 |
| 3. | Example from Dr. Brown-Séquard's researches on the nervous system | 533 |
| 4. | Examples of following newly-discovered laws into their complex manifestations | 534 |
| 5. | Examples of empirical generalizations, afterwards confirmed and explained deductively | 536 |
| 6. | Example from mental science | 538 |
| 7. | Tendency of all the sciences to become deductive | 539 |