[168] 13 Geo. II, chap. 19.

[169] 8 and 9 Vict. chap. 109. sec. 1.

[170] Wharton, 65.

[171] Abinger, C. B., in McKinnell v. Robinson, 3 M. & W. 439.

[172] Tanner v. Albion, 5 Hill, 128; but see People v. Sargeant, 8 Cowen, 139.

[173] McDaniels v. Commonwealth, 6 Bush. 326.

[174] Neal’s Case, 22 Gratt. 917.

[175] Enbanks v. State, 3 Hersk. 488.

[176] Graham v. Peat, 1 East, 246.

[177] Doyle v. Walker, 26 U. C. R. 502.

[178] Cayle’s Case, 8 Co. 32.

[179] Lasseen v. Clark, 37 Ga. 242.

[180] Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Smith, 73 Ill. 360.

[181] Morgan v. Ravey, 6 Hurl. & N. 265.

[182] Ibid.

[183] Giles v. Libby, 36 Barr. 70. But see Hyatt v. Taylor, 51 Barb. 632, and Rosenplanter v. Roessle, 54 N. Y. 262.

[184] Bodwell v. Bragg, 29 Iowa, 232.

[185] Morgan v. Ravey, 30. L. J. Ex. 131.

[186] Bernstein v. Sweeney, 33 N. Y. Sup. Ct. 271.

[187] Imp. Stat., 26 and 27 Vict., chap. 41, sec. 1. A similar statute is in force in Ontario, only the money is limited to forty dollars. (37 Vict. O., chap 11, secs. 1-4.)

[188] Statutes of 1855, chap. 421.

[189] Wisconsin has a like law. (Laws of 1864, chap. 318.)

[190] Spice v. Bacon, L. R. 2 Ex. Div. 463; 16 A. L. J. 385.

[191] Remaly v. Leland, 43 N. Y. 538; Kellogg v. Sweeney, 1 Lans. N. Y. 397.

[192] Remaly v. Leland, supra.

[193] Bernstein v. Sweeney, 35 N. Y. 271; Krohn v. Sweeney, 2 Daly, N. Y. 200; Milford v. Wesley, 1 Wilson, (Ind.) 119.

[194] Stewart v. Parsons, 24 Wis. 241.

[195] Giles v. Libbey, 36 Bar. 70.

[196] Rosenplanter v. Roessle, 54 N. Y. 262.

[197] Rosenplanter v. Roessle, 54 N. Y. 262; Bendetson v. French, 46 N. Y. distinguished.

[198] 11 Can. Law Jour. N. S. 103.

[199] Pope v. Hall, 14 La. An. 324.

[200] Hawkins v. Hoffman, 6 Hill, 586.

[201] Macrow v. G. W. Rw. L. R. 6 Q. B. 622.

[202] Wilkins v. Earle, 18 Abb. N. Y. 190.

[203] Brooke v. Pickwick, 4 Bing. 218; McGill v. Rowand, 3 Penn. St. 451.

[204] Nevins v. Bay State S. B. Co. 4 Bosw. 589.

[205] Jones v. Voorhes, 10 Ohio, 145; Miss. C. Rw. v. Kennedy, 41 Miss. 471.

[206] Bonner v. Maxwell, 9 Humphrey, 621.

[207] McCormick v. Hudson River Rw. 4 E. D. Smith, 181.

[208] Giles v. Fauntleroy, 13 Md. 126.

[209] Brutz v. G. T. R. 32 U. C. Q. B. 66.

[210] Re H. M. Wright, Newberry Admiralty; Sasseen v. Clark, 37 Ga. 242.

[211] Toledo & Wabash Riv. v. Hammond, 33 Ind. 379.

[212] Sasseen v. Clark, 37 Ga. 242.

[213] Wood v. Devon, 13 Ill. 746.

[214] Davis v. C. & S. Rw. 10 How. Pr. 330.

[215] Giles v. Fauntleroy, 13 Md. 126.

[216] Hudston v. Midland Rw. L. R. 4 Q. B. 366.

[217] Hawkins v. Hoffman, 6 Hill, N. Y. Rep 589.

[218] Gt. W. Rev. v. Shepherd, 8 Ex. 38. But see Bell v. Drew, 4 E. D. Smith, 59.

[219] Hopkins v. Westcott, 7 Am. Law. Reg. N. S. 533.

[220] Mytton v. Midland Rw. 4 H. & N. 615.

[221] Macrow v. Gt. W. Rw. L. R. 6 Q. B. 622, Cockburn, C. J.

[222] Brutz v. G. T. Rw. 32 U. C. Q. B. 66.

[223] Porter v. Hildebrand, 14 Pa. St. 129.

[224] Brutz v. G. T. R. supra.

[225] Gilox v. Shepherd, 8 Ex. 30; Pardee v. Drew, 25 Wend. 459; Shaw v. G. T. Rw. 7 U. C. C. P. 493.

[226] Belfast B. L. & C. Rw. v. Keys, 9 Ho. Lords Cas. 556; Hawkins v. Hoffman, 6 Hill, 586.

[227] Phelps v. London & N. W. Rw. 19 C. B. N. S. 321.

[228] Ibid.

[229] Giles v. Fauntleroy, 13 Md. 126.

[230] Brutz v. G. T. Rw. supra.

[231] Shoecraft v. Bailey, 25 Iowa, 553.

[232] Weiseinger v. Taylor, 1 Bush, 275.

[233] Maltby v. Chapman, 25 Md. 307; a decision under Md. Code, art. 70, secs. 5, 6.

[234] Taylor v. Monnot, 4 Duer, (N. Y.) 116; Van Wyck v. Howard, 12 How. (N. Y.) Pr. 147; Stanton v. Leland, 4 E. D. Smith, (N. Y.) 88; Simon v. Miller, 7 La. An. 360.

[235] Hyatt v. Taylor, 51 Barb. N. Y. 632; 42 N. Y. 259.

[236] Wilkins v. Earle, 18 Abb. N. Y. 190.

[237] Wilkins v. Earle, 44 N. Y. 172.

[238] Story’s Commentaries, sec. 481.

[239] Commentaries, sec. 470.

[240] 1 Black. Com. 430.

[241] Kent v. Shuckard, 2 B. & Ad. 803.

[242] Per McCann, J., Wilkins v. Earle.

[243] Orange Co. Bank v. Brown, 9 Wend. 85; Weed v. Saratoga & Sch. Rw. 19 Wend. 524; Red. on Railways, vol. 2, pp. 55, 58.

[244] Coggs v. Barnard, 1 Sm. Leading Cases, 309; Lane v. Cotton, 12 Mod. 487; Wharton on Innkeepers, 97.

[245] Cole v. Goodwin, 19 Wend.

[246] Quintin v. Courtney. Hay. (N. C.) 41.

[247] Giles v. Libby, 36 Barb. 70.

[248] Berkshire Woollen Co. v. Proctor, 7 Cush. 417.

[249] Pinkerton v. Woodward, 33 Cal. 557.

[250] Bendeton v. French, 44 Barb. 31.

[251] Woodward v. Bird, 4 Bush. (Ky.) 510.

[252] Houser v. Tulley, 62 Pa. St. 92.

[253] Sneider v. Geiss, 1 Yeates, 24.

[254] Rosenplanter v. Roessle, 54 N. Y. 262; Bendetson v. French, 46 N. Y.

[255] Stanton v. Leland, 4 E. D. Smith, 88.

[256] Wharton on Negligence, secs. 50, 730.

[257] Wharton on Neg. sec. 732; Hood. v. Grimes, 13 B. Mon. 188.

[258] Ritchey v. West, 23 Ill. 385.

[259] Wharton on Negligence, secs. 437, 641.

[260] Wharton on Negligence, sec. 731.

[261] Jones on Bailments, 88.

[262] Addison on Contracts, 415.

[263] Wharton on Negligence, sec. 713.

[264] Mitchum v. The State, 45 Ala. 29.

[265] Merrill v. Claghorn, 23 Vt. 177; also Vance v. Throckmorton, 5 Bush. (Ky.) 41.

[266] Dawson v. Chamney, 5 Q. B. (N. S.) 164.

[267] Cutler v. Bonney, 30 Mich. 259.

[268] Mateer v. Brown, 1 Cal. 225; Wharton on Neg. p. 111.

[269] Hulett v. Swift, 33 N. Y. 571.

[270] Faucett v. Nicholls, 64 N. Y. 377.

[271] Mateer v. Brown, 1 Cal. 221.

[272] Dale v. Hall, 1 Wils. 281.

[273] Kay v. Wheeler, L. R. 2 C. P. 302.

[274] Carstairs v. Taylor, Law R. 6 Ex. 217.

[275] Carstairs v. Taylor, supra.

[276] Ibid. per Bramwell, J.

[277] McKome v. Word, 5 Car. & P. 1.

[278] McDaniels v. Robinson, 26 Vt. 311; Morse v. Shee, 1 Vent. 190, 238.

[279] Mateer v. Brown, 1 Cal. 221; Norcross v. Norcross, 53 Me. 163; Pinkerton v. Woodward, 33 Cal 557.

[280] Mateer v. Brown, supra. See, also, Mason v. Thompson, 9 Pick. 284.

[281] Story on Bailments, sec. 17.

[282] Rolfe, B. in Wilson v. Brett, 11 M. & W. 110; Austin v. Manchester &c. Railway, 10 C. B. 474.

[283] Fowler v. Dorlon, 24 Barb. 384.

[284] Armistead v. White, 29 Law J. Q. B. 524.

[285] Cashill v. Wright, 6 El. & B. 898.

[286] Chamberlain v. Masterson, 26 Ala. 371; Hadley v. Upshaw, 27 Tex. 547; Profiles v. Hall, 11 La. An. 324.

[287] Kelsey v. Berry, 42 Ill. 469; Cayle’s Case, 8 Coke, 32.

[288] 1 Andess. 29.

[289] Bennett v. Mellor, 5 T. R. 273.

[290] Erle, J., in Cashill v. Wright, 6 El. & B. 895.

[291] Cayle’s Case, 8 Coke, 32.

[292] Mitchell v. Woods, 16 L. T. Rep. N. S. 676; Filipourke v. Merryweather, 2 Fost. & F. 285.

[293] Spice v. Bacon, 16 Alb. L. J. 386.

[294] Classen v. Leopold, 2 Sweeney, (N. Y.) 705.

[295] Baddenberg v. Benner, 1 Hilt. (N. Y.) 84.

[296] Burgess v. Clements, 4 Moore & S. 306.

[297] Pettigrew v. Barnum, 11 Md. 434; Giles v. Fauntleroy, 13 Md. 126.

[298] Burgess v. Clements, supra.

[299] Per Montague Smith, J.; Oppenheim v. White Lion Hotel Co. L. R. 6 C. P. 515.

[300] Cayle’s Case.

[301] Oppenheim v. White Lion Hotel Co. ante.

[302] Jones v. Tyler, 1 Ad. & E. 522.

[303] Taunton, J., in Jones v. Tyler.

[304] Piper v. Manny, 21 Wend. 283.

[305] Story on Bailments, sec. 478.

[306] Chute v. Wiggins, 14 Johnson, 175.

[307] Parsons on Contracts, vol. 2, p. 169.

[308] Dickenson v. Rodgers, 4 Humph. (Tenn.) 179.

[309] Seymour v. Cook, 53 Barb. 451.

[310] Metcalf v. Hess, 14 Ill. 129; Hill v. Owen, 5 Blackf. (Ind.) 323.

[311] Thickstern v. Howard, 8 Blackf. 535.

[312] Jordan v. Boone, 5 Rich. 528.

[313] Washburn v. Jones, 14 Barb. 193.

[314] Dawson v. Chamney, 52 B. 33.

[315] Wharton on Innkeepers, p. 111; Matier v. Brown, 1 Cal. 221.

[316] Cayle’s Case, 8 Rep. 32; Hawley v. Smith, 25 Wend. 642.

[317] Story on Bailments, sec. 478.

[318] Saunders v. Plummer, Orl. Bridg. 227.

[319] Mason v. Thompson, 9 Pickering, 280.

[320] Bennet v. Mellor, 5 T. R. 273.

[321] Wintermute v. Clarke, 5 Sandf. 242; Smith v. Dearlove, 6 C. B. 132.

[322] Peel v. McGraw, 25 Wendell, 653; York v. Grindstone, 1 Salk. 388; Sturt v. Dromgold, 3 Bulst. 289. But see Grinnell v. Cook, 3 Hills, N. Y. 686; Ingallsbee v. Wood, 33 N. Y. 577; 36 Barb. N. Y. 425; Nowers v. Fethers, 61 N. Y. 34; Healey v. Gray, 68 Me. 489.

[323] Mason v. Thompson, supra.

[324] Bacon’s Abr. Inns and Innkeepers, C.

[325] Bacon, supra.

[326] 21 Jac. I, chap. 21, sec. 2.

[327] 1 Hawk. 225.

[328] Cayle’s Case, 8 Rep. 32; Stammin v. Davis, 1 Salk. 404.

[329] Rosse v. Bramstead, 2 Rol. Rep. 438; Bac. Abr. vol. 4, p. 411; Parsons on Contracts, vol. 3, p. 250. But see Mulliner v. Florence, L. R. 3 Q. B. D. 454.

[330] Moss v. Townsend, 1 Bulstr. 207. But see Story on Bailments, sec. 476.

[331] Story on Bailments, sec. 476.

[332] Allan v. Smith, 12 C. B., N. S. 638.

[333] Jones v. Thurloe, 8 Mod. 172; Jones v. Pearle, 1 Strange, 556; Parsons on Contracts, vol. 3, p. 250.

[334] Ross v. Bramstead, 2 Rol. Rep. 438.

[335] York v. Grindstone, 2 Ld. Raym. 866. But see Fox v. McGregor, 11 Barb. (N. Y.) 41; Saint v. Smith, 1 Caldw. (Tenn.) 51.